#110;g

[brightquang]

Petition US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES August Term__________________, 2019 PETITION __________ THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) BRIGHT QUANG Respondent ) Petitioner V. ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ) Confidential Document: Office of the Democratic Leader ) 532272 H-204, US Capitol ) _________ Washington, DC 20515 ) Self Help: (202) 225–0100 ) Bright Quang V. ) 217 5th Ave # 8 Honorable Jerrold Nadler ) Redwood City, Chairman of the House Committee ) CA94063 On the Judiciary ) 650–278–9542 2132 Rayburn Building ) bright_qng@yahoo.com Washington, DC 20515 ) (202) 225–5635 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/ ) V. ) Honorable Adam Smith ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Armed Services ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building, ) Washington, D.C. 20515 ) P: (202) 225–4151 | F: (202) 225–9077 ) V. ) Honorable Eliot L. Engel ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Foreign Affairs ) 2170 Rayburn House Office Building ) Washington, DC 20515 ) Phone: (202) 225–5021 ) Fax: (202) 225–5393 ) CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America’s fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam? II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets? III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let’s understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family — even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves? IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what’s means? TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TABLE OF CONTENTS ………………………………page I.QUESTIONS/PRESENTED… i II.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA……………………… i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ……………………………IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE …………………………….1 to 161 V. OPINIONS BELOW………….1 VI. JURISDICTION.…….………2 vii. INTRODUCTION………… 2 IV. BACKGROUND ………….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND………………3 Xi. DISCUSSION……………96 Vii. CONCLUSION……………………………………………………159 Xii. APPENDIX..…….163 to 511 Xiii. ATTACHMENT…511 to 512 28 U.S. C. § 453 — Oaths of justices ……………………1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257………1 28 U.S. C§§1254–1651-Jurisdiction………………… 1 H. Res. 309 — recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975...1 S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………………………5 9.11 Particular Rights — First Amendment…………………6 28U.S.C.§1346b.June25,1948..7 22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527…….….8 22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473…………………………9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461…………………19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322………21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153; Pub. L. 85–729……………………………23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950………………………29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963……………………30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963………………….32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961……………………………35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance Dec. 20, 1975..………36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…………………37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfully-influencing.Sep.14,2007……39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5). Definition Aug.16,1954………40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948………41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950……43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947……………………46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)©. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972…………………48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966……………………………51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974…………..…………53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………………………56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………….………………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………64 22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961……………………………65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982-66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983……………………….…71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……72 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals……………..……74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D…………………………73 Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983……………………………73 28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948……79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander…..80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]..80 42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935………………81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998…………….82 17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action; Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990….87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-…………………89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual…………91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948……………………………92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities; May 22, 1995………………………96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..….98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism..………………101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;…………102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)©Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; July 3,1948…….………………107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…110 28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure……………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..…………116 28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948.. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948……120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of States-June 25, 1948- 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as Prerequisite; evidence…………………122 28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar…………123 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948………………124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 — Attorney fees; penalty……………………..125 28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ...126 28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions……………….129 22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice……………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions…………………135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims……………37 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation……………139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……………141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980……………………142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement………143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture-145 28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)© — Review of orders and actions. (Added Pub 107–273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)………………149 28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………….151

[mechagalaxy]

Sten Hugo Hiller - 627184: Mecha Combat #1042 - December 3349 Rhinoplasty

(By Sten Hugo Hiller - 627184)

Mountain Climbing Mecha Combat #1042

Brought to you by ANN

Highlighting the December 3349 Rhinoplasty

Just after the Ant event, the Gaming authorities decided to have another event featuring a Mech model. This time the Keradon was the chosen model and, unlike in the Ant event, no other Mech models were allowed.

-Unless you fought on K11, there all Mech models were legal.

For me this looked to be another of those events I had better stay away from. After all, having at least one legal Mech is for me more or less a requirement for joining up.

This time however, it seemed few if any on the higher tops had legal Mechs in numbers, so perhaps joining up wasnt such a bad idea after all?

The rules for Mech combat are such that if the defender have no legal Mechs, the attacker wins (even if they have no legal Mechs either)

So a fight could well come to who had the most hatorades and could get the last unopposed win. Of course, any Keradon present in a formation, even a factory fresh one would defeat my forces but….

I went over to the hangar and told Bruno to get a formation ready for the tournament. He cocked his head and told me it could take some time.

Seeing my incredulous expression, he motioned me to follow him to an out of the way part of the hangar.

There, covered by a thick coat of dust, draped in spiderwebs and having lost almost all the luster of its original paint job, was a Mech I had thought we had sold last century.

Fido, the only Keradon I have ever had, was slow in responding when he was turned on, and the stifflegged gait when he was manuvered to one of the repair bays told volumes about the staus of his actuators and lubricant.

But Bruno gathered a gang of older techs and went to work. Since I had nothing to contribute there, it was back to the office and the paperworkmonster for me.

Several hours later a runner was sent to fetch me. Fido had been restored to his former glory, and been given the pick of equipment. He reported ready, so we went to the Mountains.

There we were assigned to K3.

The curse was in effect, only five others had showed up, and none of them had visible Keradons.

A quick strike against an naked opponent, and we were on the slopes. The way further was open.

The top was held by Ales Hasala of the premier Northwind Dragons. He have an impressive string of KotM wins and can field a full Nephilax formation. Here he had brought what looked to be his 35 ton formation along.

Since he had held the top for a long time, I had to assume he had at least one Keradon tucked away in there, probably two and perhaps even more.

Since his licence also was quite a bit higher than mine, his Keradons would also outgun Fido by 49 weapon emplacements to his 41. But he only way to find out was to try….

Ok, this was going to be one of the hardest challenges in my career. Ales did not have just one or two Keradons. He had a full line containing six of them.

The only way we could possibly beat him was to take out all of his Mechs in a single strike, so it was back to the compound for rearmament.

A bit later, Fido had gotten mostly Wide Fork weapons and we returned. The trick now was to a) fire first, b) generate a huge hit, and c) trigger the Wide Fork.

It took more than 50 tries before Fido managed it. Yes we held the top, but by the thinnest of threads, and my supers were all gone. But no immediate counterattack took place. Perhaps none of the other Commanders was present yet? The scramble was after all a bit into the future . But if Hasala returned, the odds of getting the top from him another time was somewhere between slim and none.

But despite it being a pretty long scramble, none of the others attacked us, so when the light flashed we still held the top.

To keep from gnawing off my fingers, I had scanned and recorded the action on all of the tops, so I knew the winners this time had been:

Div 1 355+ (21 Commanders): Sherriff Leary Wretham, Warlock (5h,26m)

2: Jeff Haas

3: Dan Ross

4: Ben Rail

5: Daniel Scott

6: Sal Vezzosi Jr

7: Gary Muenzel

8: Joe Kump

9: Larry Vandervort

10: Robert C Goetz Sr

Div 2 -354 (17 Commanders): Stroker Spot, Slaughter House 5 (8h,16m)

Div 3 -231 (6 Commanders): Sten Hugo Hiller, Star League (1h,23s)

Div 4 -190 (12 Commanders): Ales Tomasek, B.S.L.R. (16h,36m)

Div 5 -150 (22 Commanders): Brian Wilson, Smurf Platoon (4h,40m)

Div 6 -110 (18 Commanders): ANNeditor, HF 110 C.C. 1st A.R. (19h,49m)

Div 7 -84 (15 Commanders): Patrick T Kennon, ***R.V.*** (2h,1m)

Div 8 -62 (15 Commanders): Kalevi Karvinen, Brigade of Patrol Smurfs (6h,2m)

Div 9 -42 (11 Commanders): Tom Condon, The Goonies (2h,19m)

Div 10 -27 (17 Commanders): Draco_Dragon_, Jagdstaffel 2 (1d,1h)

Div 11 -17 (19 Commanders): RiffRaff_, Jagdstafel 1 (10h,28m)

On the 10 highest tops, only the Keradon was legal, but only

1(G)+0+0+1(1S)+3(G,2S)+1(G)+0+2(G,1S)+0+0= Four Golds and four Silvers were awarded to Commanders who had what could have been pure Keradon formations.

Total Contestants: 183

Total medals claimed: 149 (of 165 possible)

Compared to the Red Ant event we just had, the paricipation rose by seventeen Commanders.

But between the curse of K3 and the regular imbalance between the tops, a total of sixteen Bronzes ended unclaimed and were returned for resmelting.

The last half-hour brought no change in who held the tops, and ten of the Golds were held for more than two hours, one of them for more than a day.

Sounds like an extreme case of the haves vs the have nots, although it could also be a lack of fighting spirit. To get a better feel of which, we take a look at the number of medals held for more than 30 minutes in this event:

.............Silvers......Bronzes

Div 1 ....0 of 4.........6 of 10

Div 2 ....3 of 4.........6 of 10

Div 3 ....4 of 4.........1 of 1

Div 4 ....3 of 4.........5 of 7

Div 5 ....4 of 4.......10 of 10

Div 6 ....1 of 4.........4 of 10

Div 7 ....4 of 4.......10 of 10

Div 8 ....4 of 4.......10 of 10

Div 9 ....4 of 4.........6 of 6

Div 10 ..4 of 4.......10 of 10

Div 11 ..4 of 4.......10 of 10

Seven tops without a single medal changing hands point toward little fighting, but on both Mount Olympus and K6 there was fierce fighting for the lesser prizes, and most of the medals on those two tops got redistributed.

This was another of those "no" events. No clans got more than one Gold, no repeat winners and no Gold to any of the unaligned Commanders.

Upcoming event: Quadruple Rainbow Chrono

Here we have a Rainbow event, and the most inclusive of them at that. A Commander may use up to four Mechs from each model (any further Mechs will be treated as a blank space when it comes to fighting in the arena).

It is also a Chrono, so signing up soonest to start scoring points is highly recommended for those who want (good) prizes.

Event ends August 8 between 0000 and 0030 New York Time

[aruneshgoyal]

MANUSCRIPT INFORMATON REPORT

I. AUTHOR INFORMATION

Full Name of the author(s) [Surname first] GOYAL ARUNESH

Affiliation (as it should appear on the title pg.) 

Topper, B.Sc. (H) Mathematics, Kirorimal College, North Campus, University of Delhi, DELHI – 110 007 (India) 

MCA (1990), Dept of Computer Sc., Arts Faculty Bldg., University of Delhi, DELHI – 110 007 

Formerly, Computer Analyst/Consultant, St. Stephens Hospital, Tis Hzari, DELHI – 110 054 

Affiliated to the Third Eye Foundation of India (Regd.), C/o Shri Siddheshwar Ashram, V. & P.O. Bhigaan, Dist. Sonepat, HARYANA – 131 033 (INDIA)

Office Address 

Y-7/6 [y-7 flat 6 ii floor), Naveen Shahdara, near “Durga” sweets, DELHI 110032 (INDIA) P: +918527703136          

E: aruneshtheauthor@gmail.com

Residence Address 

Y-7/6 [y-7 flat 6 TOP floor], Naveen Shahdara, near “Durga” sweets, DELHI 110032 (INDIA) P: +918527712504

Academic Qualifications & names of universities Degree {starting with highest}     

MCA   B.Sc. (H) Mathematics  A.I.S.S.C.E. University  

    Univ.  of DELHI                          Sardar Patel Vidyalaya                                                                                           Lodi Est., N D                                                                                                           (under CBSE)  

Year 1990    1987                             1984

Teaching Exp. 

Mathematics & Gen. Ethics

Prof. Exp. (e.g. Industry) 

Programmer Analyst/Consultant for St. Stephens Hospital, Tis Hzari, DELHI 

(11 yrs tenure 1992 – 2002)

Major Awards/recognitions: 

Merit Certificate for outstanding performance in std. X Awarded by Shri Amitabh Bachchan for excellence during graduation (1986) 

Securing 100% marks in one of the final year graduation papers viz. Mechanics Awarded Post Graduate Scholarship

Membership of Associations/Societies: 

Vice-President of the Mathematics Society (KMC) during the calendar year 1986-87 

Ex-membership (GOLD card) of the British Council Div. Lib., 17, K G marg, New Delhi 110001 for ten yrs from 2007 till march 2017 

Greatly vouchsafe my spiritual Guru Shri Siddheshwar Baba founder member of Third Eye Foundation of India (Regd.), V. & P.O. Bhigaan, Sonepat, Haryana 131 033 (INDIA), formerly Sh. B.S. Goel, Ph.D., M.A. (Pol. Sc.) best known for his pioneering work – “Third Eye and Kundalini” translated into Hindi and many foreign languages as well inc. German, Spanish, French and Russian.

Books Published (in order of Title, Pub., year): _________________________________________________ 

Title                            Publisher                      Year _________________________________________________ 

1 Systems Analysis      PHI Learning                2011   

And Design                    Pvt. Ltd. 

2 The C Programming Narosa Publishing         2008    

Language                      House Pvt. Ltd. _________________________________________________ _________________________________________________

II. MANUSCRIPT DETAILS Title:  HUMAN VALUES & ETHICS, any Takers! 

Completion Date: 22-OCT-2012 No. Of Pages Text: 236 Preliminaries (inc. TOC): 20 No. Of Diagrams (Full or Half Page): Nil 

No. of Photographs (Full or Half Page): Nil Software Used For: 

1. Text: MS-Word 

2. Eq./Math. Exp./Chemical Reactions: N.A. 

3. Diagrams: N.A. .                    

Subject of the book                                                          

The subject matter of the book deals with ethics and                                 

human  values which are universal in nature. Indeed, in this                              era of degrading moral values and ethics, the book                              

attempts to highlight good and positive human values as                              

well as noble ethical & moral values of life.   

                 The book tries to foster the five basic human values of Truth, Righteous Conduct, Peace, Love & Non-violence by means of short stories, famous quotations and the like. It keeps in mind the spiritual, intellectual, mental, psychic and physical aspects in this context. Each lesson begins with a teaching objective and ends with model questions including personality tests and a practical exercise. 

Throughout, the accent is on quality rather than quantity. Also, there is a basic realization that change in values/character must begin somewhere. Moreover, rather than changing others, each individual should first reform himself/herself, as the case may be. Ideally though, human values are easier to inculcate at a young age. 

Moreover, the book degrades the five basic negative emotions of lust, anger, greed, attachment and ego/pride which must be reoriented and maintained well in balance. In this context, it relies heavily on the Gita, which it considers to be a universal psychic book rather than a religious treatise associated with Hinduism.

  III. COMPETITION Analysis of Chief Competing texts (latest ed. only): _________________________________________________ 

Title/Author                                      Pub.       Yr.     Price ________________________________________________ 

1 RR Gaur, R Sangal, GP Bagaria                  

A Foundation Course in Human     Excel     2009  Rs.175          

Values and Professional Ethics        Books                                                                 N Delhi                                 

2 RR Gaur, R Sangal, GP Bagaria                

 Teacher’s Manual for                        -do-    -do-          Rs.60           

A Foundation Course in Human                                

Values and Professional Ethics                                                         

3 ML Dewan, AK Hosdurg, P Nayak                         

The Human Values                         Concept   2009  Rs.500                                                                                           Pub. Co.                                                                                                                   N Delhi                               _________________________________     ____________________                                                                                           

How would your book have an Edge over other leading/established texts? 

Books on Human Values and Ethics are hard to find. At the moment, there are not many established texts with books beginning to be written on the subject only recently. Indeed, the subject area is so vast and profound that it is well nigh difficult to cover it completely. Another pitfall of the current texts is that they are either written on Human Values or on Ethics but not on both. Even if one or two texts are available, they tend to neglect one area at the expense of other. The proposed book makes a sincere, honest and welcome effort towards this end by trying to cover the broad subject matter to the maximum extent possible.

 It brings forth the fact that Human Values and Ethics are interrelated. In fact, Ethics are based on Human Values rather than anything else. 

Another feature is its universality. Be it a youngster or an adult, an Indian or a foreigner, a Hindu or a non-Hindu, it has something in it for each one of them, call it universal appeal if you like!                                                                                                                                      

Are Worked Out Examples/Problems with solutions included in each chapter?    ………. NO Worked out Examples/Problems with solutions, it was felt, would obstruct the smooth and natural flow of the text and thus, hinder the learning process itself!                                                                                                              Are Problems/Questions given at the end of each chapter (besides the above)? …………….. YES Model Questions, personality tests and practical exercises are given at the end of each subsection/lesson.

Which of the following supplementary material will be provided for use by students or teachers? 

Students’ CD                               N.A. 

Solution Manual for teachers       N.A.  

PowerPoint Slides                        N.A. 

No need for any supplementary material was felt. Most of the questions are subjective in nature and need just common sense as well as demand an easy  comprehension of the easy subject material included in each chapter. 

IV. MARKET INFORMATION Indicate the level of the book: Undergraduate         *   

Postgraduate            *  

Polytechnic               * 

Others                       * Note: The book cannot be confined to one level because of its universal nature.

Is the book to be used as a text? If so, for which specific course/paper is it designed? (Don’t give a generalized statement like: this book can be used for courses in MCA, MBA, B. Tech., M. Tech., and so on …….)

The subject matter o the book is universal in nature. It can also be used as a text by any university following a course in Human Values and/or Ethics.

If the book has special appeal outside India, indicate the countries, and if possible, specific universities/individuals who may be receptive to the book. - AS ABOVE –

V. PLEASE ATTACH 1. Your latest Bio-data. Please find one attached. 

2. Your Proposed book’s Table of Contents. Please find TOC attached. 

3. Two sample chapters. Please find the complete script attached.                           

Signature of the Author: A. Goyal                                                                 (ARUNESH GOYAL) Date: 27/06/2017    09:15 hrs I.S.T. 

Place: DELHI (Shahdara), India     Pin 110032  

[lokmanhekimsite]

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği 110 ML

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği 110 ML

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği 110 ML Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği Kaç ML ?

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği 110 ML

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği Üretici Firma Adı

Salkom Kozmetik

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği Üretici Firma İşletme Kayıt Numarası

TR-34-K-092533

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği Ürün Barkod Numarası

8680254637935

Rochcell Nemlendirici Yüz Toniği Kullanıcı Yorumları

[theleaderdotinfo-blog]

Costa Blanca South Bowls Roundup 3 Feb 19 has been published at http://www.theleader.info/2019/02/03/costa-blanca-south-bowls-roundup-3-feb-19/

New Post has been published on http://www.theleader.info/2019/02/03/costa-blanca-south-bowls-roundup-3-feb-19/

Costa Blanca South Bowls Roundup 3 Feb 19

El Rancho Bowls Club Monday morning found the Pintos playing the Dalmations at San Miguel in a nippy and tricky wind, but the Mustangs persevered and came away with a very good result, taking 4 of the 5 rinks and the overall shots. Malc Sykes, John Skipper and Jim Gracie 20-10. Ann C Taylor, Denise Morgan and Bob Taylor 20-16. Ron Greenstreet, Diane Yates and Bob Morgan 20-13. Irene Thomson, Keith Cunningham and Eddie Thomson 20-16. Brian Gilham, Paul Durham and David Whitworth 13-20. Meanwhile the Raiders had a bye.The Palominos were at home to another San Miguel team, the Pointers, who went away with all the points. But there is no shame in that, as all continue to hone their skills and gain experience, with two of the rinks losing by just one shot. On Friday morning the Rangers took on Emerald Isle Outlaws at home and although they took just one rink, they lost another by just one shot and had another close match. However with the introduction of 5 rink matches and more team, I think some players are in a lower division than they would have been and it is only fun after all. Meanwhile the Mustangs were at San Luis playing the Tigers and played some tough matches, but came away just the one rink, but we had good fun and some interesting bowls. In the afternoon the Broncos played the Miners at Mazarron and put in a good performance to come away with 2 rinks.   For further membership information contact Sheila Cox at micksheilacox@gmail.com or Brian Taylor on 965077093 or at elranchobowlsclub@gmail.com COUNTRY BOWLS CLUB For the third time in seven days Country Bowls played host to a team from La Siesta ( they must like us! ). The Pioneers arrived full of optimism but left feeling down after a heavy defeat. Well done Flamingos. Winning rinks: Agnes Burke, Pat Ray & Brian Ray 30 – 8, Rob Hallam, Graham Richardson & Jim Rennie 16 – 12, Craig Dyson, John Burke & Dennis Birkett 25 -11, John Jukes, Derek Jiggins & Geoff Paylor 20 – 9. Great result. Middle of the league Country Bowls welcomed leaders Greenland’s Cedars to a wet and windy miserable Friday morning in the Valle Del Sol. The Cubs stacked up ready to do battle and try to improve on their 10 – 2 defeat from the first leg. Everyone dug deep and the standard of bowling was exceptional, the Cubs held their own at the half way mark. The wind continued to blow and the bowling didn’t ease. In the end, the newly developed Cubs for this season took the spoils on three rinks and drew on one giving an overall score of 9 – 3 to the Cubs. Winning rinks; Chris Stevens, Craig Dyson & Andy Bryce. Steve Mattison, Agnes Burke & Lynne Bryce. Sandra McIlroy, Dot Davies & Peter Robins. What a fantastic and encouraging result. Well done Cubs. In the afternoon the Geckos travelled to Quesada to play a strong team currently lying third, just one point behind the second place team La Siesta Golds. Quesada proved to be too strong for the Geckos winning on three rinks and winning the overall shots. The Geckos winning teams are; Pat Patton, Dennis Wade & Brian Patton, Sylvia Rennie, Jean Turner & Jim Rennie. A reasonably good performance by the Geckos against such a strong team away from home. Well done to everyone, For more information please contact grahamandjo7@gmail.com, tel 966191552 or visit the website www.countrybowlsmurcia.com Emerald Isle by Elwyn Morris Emerald Isle Monday brought Monte Mar Maadors to the Isle and home advantage came out on top 8=4 aggregate 95=68,,winers where G Shoots J Pooley M Odell  29=15,,D Rhodes C Smyth D Gerrard   23=8, M Riley P Coffey I Brewster 20=15 Neptunes played at home against La Marina Pathfinders and drew 6=6   ,aggregate was 83=96,,wnners where R Adams LVincent H Rhodes 25=8,   ,M Whitelock J Westall P Heaney 21=14, C Ayling B Eldred J Mullarkey 2=20 Moonrakers where at Monte Mar Torreadores and slipped to a 2=10 aggregate of 63=96,winners where M Breen J Loughran E Bennett 19=11. Saturns where away at La Siesta Sputniks and lost 4=8 aggregate 86=87. winners where B Taylor T Roche T Upham 24=16, M Elliott P Creswell J Mulloy 17=14 Wed brought San Miguel to the Isle in the Winter League and the E.I won 8=4, aggregate 86=81,winners where P Rhodes C Smyth M Odell C Lindgren  24=9,, D Jones M Veale M Breen  D Gerrard 20=14, S Kavanagh D Leeming D Close B Kavanagh 17=16 Thursday saw Emerald Isle play Greenlands in Fed4s and it finished 4=4. Cavaliars played at home Friday against San Miguel Bulldogs and drew 6=6 aggregate 81=75,,winners where,,G Shoots K Jolliffe C Lindgren 25=13, D Jones R White I Brewster 24=10 Claymores had Quesada Swallows at home and slipped to a 2=10 aggregate, 70=94,, defeat,winners where S Wickens  L Vincen D Donovan  21=14 Outlaws travelled to El Rancho Rangers and had a great 10 =2 aggregate of 108=77,,winners V Cameron P Willicott E Bennett 25=9, T Capewell G Ponsford   P Dix  21=10 Greenlands Bowls Club In the Discovery Division, the Sycamores were away to Vistabella Eagles. Final score - 131 - 54. 10 - 0. Best winning rink was Phil Lockley, Mary Lockley, skip Mel Brown. 37 - 6. In the Discovery Division the Maples were at home to Mazarron Mariners. Final score was 99 - 60. 12 - 0. Best winning rinks - Rudy Wattley, Jeff Hier, skip Derek Sale. 23 - 9. In the Voyager Division The Chestnuts were at home to San Luis Romulons. Final score - 74 - 102. 3 - 9. Best winning rink was Doreen Watt, Roger Farrington, skip Graham Watt. 20 - 18.  In the Winter League we were at home to Quesada, final score shots 67 - 91. points 2 - 10. Winning rink was - Lynne Morris, Jean Giddings, Mike Kelly, skip Tom Hill. 16 - 13. In the Fed 4s the Beech were at home to San Luis Bazas. Final score -  shots 60 - 39. Points 8 - 0. Best winning rink was Rita Hart, Dave Thompson, Jim Wilcock, skip Stuart Hamill. 26 - 13. The ashes meanwhile were away to Emerald Isle Leprechauns, final score - shots 51 - 53. Points  - 4 - 4.Best winning rink M Stephens, S Cordell, J Hier, skip R Cordell. 21 - 17. In the Voyager Div the Elms were away to Vistabella Swingers. final score, 62 - 125. 2 - 10. winning rink - D Field, J Bliss, skip D Thompson. 19 - 13. In the Southern League, the Cedars were away to Country Bowls Cubs. Final score 82 - 102. 3 - 9. Winning rink was P Wray, D Giddings, skip S Hamill. 28 - 17. In the Southern League the Oaks Played there best against a strong San luis lions side but although some rinks were in contention things did not go their way. Final score - 60 - 110.  0 - 12. for all inquires regarding membership pleas contact Chris Dewar on 698418987, or visit our website....greenlands-bowls.wixsite.com/greenlandsbowlsclub HORADADA BOWLS CLUB by Irene Graham Last Saturday Horadada joined with Country Bowls to play the Provincial team, the game being held at Country Bowls. We only managed one winner so congratulations to the rink of Roy Thompson, Dennis Wade, Fred Trigwell and Brian Patton who won 19 - 12. One of our other men’s rinks had a very close match but were just pipped at the post.  In spite of the result a good day was had by all as both the weather and the company were excellent.  This was a good experience to play with what you would call ‘better bowlers’.  Many thanks to   Country Bowls for hosting the event and providing a very good meal afterwards. On Monday the Falcons in the Discovery Division were away to Quesada Rubies.  Not a good result for us as we only won on one rink.  Our winning rink was:  Debbie Perryman Fred Trigwell and Barry Evans 14 – 12.  The final result being 55 shots for to 83 against.  2 points to Horadada to 10 for Quesdada.  Onwards and upwards Falcons, keep going. Friday saw Horadada Royals away to San Miguel Boxers.  The weather was a bit iffy. Will it rain or not?  The rain stayed away till the last 2 ends.  It came down quite heavily and everything changed!  Again not a good result for Horadada.  But team don’t despair, we had one winning rink and as is unusual for a report, I feel I have to mention the one rink that was a nearly!  It was down to the last end and when rain postponed play, the skips were still to bowl. Not looking good for Horadada as we were 4 shots down, then our skip came in and moved the jack back to give us two shots up.  Nail biting stuff, have we just got it?  No, ‘cause opposition skip came in with last wood and claimed shot.  Horadada lost by 2 shots.  Our winning rink was: John Goddard, Jack Linehan and Barry Evans 18 – 15.    Well played Guys.  Final score was shots for 70 to 120 against.  Points gained 2 to 10 against. Keep ‘em bowls a rollin’ Horadada.  We can show ‘em! Horadada offers a warm welcome to new or experienced bowlers, and provides the necessary equipment.  Our roll-up days for this friendly club are Tuesday, Thursday and Sunday mornings.  Please contact Fred Trigwell on 659139129 for more information. La Siesta Bowls Club By Rod Edgerton In the Enterprise Division The Apollos  entertained La Marina Explorers and with good wins from Trish & Pat Reilly with George Richardson 20-7 and from Dave Davies with Florence & Mike Edwards 23-15 manged to share the points 6 apiece with the overall shots in favour of Apollos by 83 shots to 80 In the Voyager Division the Pioneers away at Country Bowls managed  to win on the rink of Gordon Dall, Barbara Cooper and Dave Laverick but lost the overall shots by 102-53 picking up just 2 points. Better news in the same division from the Sputniks who defeated E.I. Saturns by a single overall shot 87-86 winning on 3 rinks and picking up 8 points.Winners for La Siesta were Gary Randall,Sheila Millward and Jim Eastwood 19-12,Hilary Clarke,Rod Edgerton and Alan Ralph 21-18 and Joe Kocsis, Ann Edgerton and Lee Plummer winning 17-15. In the Winter League La Siesta visited San Luis and managed to win on 2 rinks picking up 4 points with the overall shots being 98-68 to San Luis.Winning rinks came from Irene Laverick,Tony Dalton,Pat Harman and Jenny Bowman 24-9 and Barbara Cooper,Val Dalton with Florence and Mike Edwards 18-14. In the Fed 4’s the Parakeets entertained Montemar Lords and managed to win on 2 rinks and won the overall shots by 61 shots to 39 picking uo 6 points. The Hoopoes lost their home match against Country Bowls without winning on any rink.  In the Southern League A Division the Blues visited Vistabella Picadors  and shared the points 6 each with Vistabella taking the shots 74-69.Pat Harman with Derek Smith and Alex Morrice best winners 16-8. The Golds in B Division entertained Montemar Matadors  and had a 92 shots to 74 win picking up 11 points from 4 wins and a draw.Heading the winners were Doug & Fay Beattie with Ros Stockell 19-11 closely followed by Tony & Val Dalton with Rab Logan 20-15. In Division C the Silvers were at home to San Luis Pumas and in a match with only 2 shots separating the teams beforen the eighteenth ends the Silvers pulled away to a victory by 97 shots to 87. The match finishing with both teams getting 6 points thanks to Janette & Lee Plummer with Wendy Ralph winning 28-7 and Kathleene and Noel Morrisroe with Willie Mcvey winning 19-18. Monte Mar Bowls and Social Club Sponsored by The Pub, Bowling Abroad, Avalon, Lounge D, Rogers, La Piazza and The Belfry.  MATADORS - Friday 25th January Monte Mar Matadors v La Manga Crusaders A good win at home for the Matadors, winning on all rinks well done everyone. Shots Matadors 142 – 49 Crusaders Points Matadors 12 – 0 Crusaders TOREADORS - Monte Mar Toreadors v La Siesta Golds A good performance by the Toreadors against the high flying Golds. Only winning on two rinks but winning the overall shots. Well done to the winning rinks of Val Hyman, Jean Chamberlain skip Dave Eades, Sheila Roberts, Chris Harding skip Jan Gatward. Shots Toreadors 76 – 68 Golds, Points Toreadors 6 – 6 Golds MATADORS - Monday 28th January Monte Mar Matadors v Emerald Isle Titans  Away to a very strong Emerald Isle team we won on two rinks well done to  Keith Simpson, Pauline Woodfine skip Barrie Woodfine, Gina Hiindle, Don Cleeter skip Margaret Finlayson. Shots Matadors 68 – 95 Titans. Points Matadors 4 – 8 Titans TOREADORS - Monte Mar Toreadors v Emerald isle Neptunes A badly needed win for the Toreadors on a Monday, winning on all rinks. Well done everyone. Shots Toreadors 96 – 63 Neptunes, Points Toreadors 10 – 2 Neptunes  WINTER LEAGUE - Wednesday 30th January - Monte Mar v El Cid Monte Mar were away to El Cid and you could not get a closer match, all teams playing their best to get a result. After fifteen ends across the boards either teams could have won twelve points to zero but it ended with both teams sharing the points. Well done everyone. Shots Monte Mar 82 – 82 El Cid, Points Mote Mar 6 – 6 El Cid FED 4's - Thursday 31st  January Monte Mar Lords v La Siesta Parakeets Away to the Parakeets the Lords won on one rink well done to Sheila Roberts, Paula and Don Cleeter skip Phil Goble. Shots Lords 39 – 61 Parakeets, Points Lords 2 – 6 Parakeets For further information about Monte Mar Bowls and Social Club check out our website   www.montemarbowls.com or email us at info@montemarbowls.com. We are also on Facebook  Quesada Bowls Club Report by Dee Stephenson In the South Alicante Winter League Quesada Pearls travelled to San Miguel to play the Alsations this week. After a very competitive and close match, the Pearls won on 3 rinks, lost one and drew one. So they won overall 9 - 3 points with the shots 91-88. This means they’ve held on to their 4th place in the league just 2 points behind San Miguel Beagles. Meanwhile, Quesada Diamonds entertained San Miguel Beagles at home. Good mornings bowling with some really close scores, 3 rinks were won on the last end, against a very strong San Miguel side. Despite some close games, the Diamonds only won on one rink so the result was a win for San Miguel 10-2. Reflecting the tight match, the overall shots were close at 101-96. The Rubies had a very successful morning when they played Horadada Falcons winning the match 10-2 and the shots 83-55. On Friday, in the Southern League, Quesada Swans were up against Montemar Torreadors, who were on form and held the Swans at bay winning the match 8-4 and the shots 90-84. Whilst Quesada Swifts hosted Country Bowls in an afternoon match. Both teams were on good form and there were some really tight heads and close finishes. Three rinks were decided by one shot two in Country bowls favour, one won by the Swifts. Overall the points were 8-4 to the Swifts with the shots 97-73. In the Winter league, Quesada played away at Greenlands and won the match 10-2 points, with 91-67 shots. Quesada are currently 5th place in the Winter League and with only 3 points separating 3rd, 4th and 5th places there’s everything to play for in the coming weeks. In the Federated 4’s, Quesada Panthers hosted another of the San Luis teams, the Ospreys. This time San Luis were the victors with 8-0 points and 86-36 shots. At Quesada Bowls Club we welcome both new and experienced bowlers. We’re a friendly club with a mixture of competition, league and casual players. In addition to league matches and Club competitions we have our popular Saturday morning chicken drive which is open to visitors, and we have free coaching for new members.  So come along and see what we have to offer! Contact our membership secretary Angie Goddard  newleaf2014@hotmail.co.uk San Miguel Bowls Club - week ending 1st February 2019 - by Barry Jones San Miguel Pointers continue with their good form playing away to El Rancho Palaminos gaining all 12 points (111 shots to 63) equal best trios Anne & David Young and Stuart Hemmings 29 - 8 and James Cutting, Brian Allen and Lynn Greenland 28 - 7. San Miguel Beagles were away to Quesada Diamonds winning 10 - 2 (101 shots to 96), the best trio were Brian Miller, Val Collins and Lin Miller 22 - 17. San Miguel Alsations were home to Quesada Pearls losing 9 - 3 (91 shots to 88), the winning trio were Jan Farmer, Derek Farmer and Mike Douglas 24 - 8. San Miguel Dalmations were home to El Rancho Pintos losing 10 - 2 (93 shots to 75), the winning triple were Stan North, Bob Graham and Frank Scotthern 20 - 13. In the Winter League San Miguel were away to The Emerald Isle losing 8 - 4 (86 shots to 81). The best winning rink were Allan Patterson, Bob Graham, Mary Dyer and Lin Miller 24 - 10. In the Fed 4’s San Miguel Cherokees and Apaches both had Bye’s. San Miguel Mohawks were home to San Luis Condors, winning 6 - 2 (69 shots to 32). The best winning rink were Bob Nesbitt, Jack Jackson, Cyril Medley and Dave Champion 29 - 7. On Friday San Miguel Boxers were home to Horadada Royals, winning 10 - 2 (120 shots to 70). The best winning trio were Sheila Errington, Peter Masters and Brian Errington with 33 - 11. San Miguel Bulldogs were away to The Emerald Isle Cavaliers, where they shared the points 6 - 6, (75 shots for 82 shots against). The best winning trio were Pat McEwan, Shiela Booth and Dave lMcEwan, 19 - 8. A reminder that the Wasps sessions take place Wednesdays 1:30 for 2:00 - €5 for an afternoon’s bowling with shoes and woods available to borrow. Due to the popularity of the Wasps, first time bowlers are asked to attend an initial coaching session on Tuesday afternoons, starting at 1:45. For further information on San Miguel Bowls Club please contact the President Stuart Hemmings on 965720461, or the Secretary Gail Willshire on 965020492. Vistabella Bowls Report With Lynne Bishop WINTER LEAGUE. Away this week at La Marina and another excellent result to put us back on top of the league table,  four winning rinks & one just losing out. Shots, VB 104(10) - 64(2) LM SAL ENTERPRISE LEAGUE Albatrosses were away to San Luis Trekkers, the scores reflect a good game and the end result was brilliant, with wins on all rinks they scored a full house. Shots, VB 94(12) - 68(0) SL. The Drivers also away at San Luis didn’t do as well playing the Klingons, they only took one win from this top team. Shots, VB 67(2) - 124(10) SL. DISCOVERY LEAGUE Eagles were at home playing Greenlands Sycamores, hoping for a few good points but unfortunately losing on all rinks. Shots, VB 54(0) - 131(12) G. VOYAGER LEAGUE the Buggies were at home, playing the San Luis Vulcans, this was the second of our teams this week to score a full house with wins across the board plus a big shot difference. Shots, VB 148(12) - 40 (0) SL. SOUTHERN LEAGUE A Div. A home game for the Lanzadores playing La Marina Ospreys, what a battle this was..hard fought until the end, the Lanzadores finished with wins on four rinks, the fifth was a couple of shots  short but a great result regardless. VB 93(10) - 80(2) LM. The Picadors were also at home playing the La Siesta Blues. They had two wins and the overall shots despite failing to field a full side. Shots, VB 74(6) - 69(6) LM Div C Swingers away to Greenlands Elms, they had four wins  and one defeat. Congratulations to Kevin Hardy, Sandra Burrows & Maggie Furness for scoring a ‘Hot Shot’ VB 125(10) - 62(2) G. Conquistadores away to La Marina Merlins played a close game but had nothing to show for it...hard luck! Shots, VB 68(0) - 99(12) LM. SAN LUIS BOWLS CLUB REPORT 01.02.19. Another busy week for all our teams, with some great results & useful points, although not everything went to plan. SA League Monday 28th Klingons home v VB Drivers, a great result; 124shots-67, 10pts-2. Winners: Colin Jackson, June & Keith Jones, 36-6, Kath Reid, Pam Lockett, Ian Kenyon 18-14, William Holtham, Sabrina & Russell Marks 24-13, Bob White, Giuseppe Galelli, Peter McEneany 33-10. Trekkers home v VB Albatrosses, a tough match 0-12, 68 shots-94. Romulans a great result away v GL Chestnuts; 9-3, 102shots-74. Winners: Pauline Johnson, Chris Lythe, Ralph Jones 23-7, Chris Phillips, Dee Hoey, Joe Millis 21-14, Pat Barnes, Danny McErlean, Tom Fromson 20-20, Robert Hicks, Rob Bruce, Lyndon Johnson 20-13. Vulcans away v VB Buggies, a hard day at the office: 0-12, 40shots-148. Wednesday 30th Winter League: a better result home v La Siesta, 8points-4, 98 shots-68. Winners: Pam Lockett, June Jones, Peter McEneany, Keith Jones 23-9, Kath Reid, Giuseppe Galelli, Neil Morrison, Ian Kenyon 30-10, Ray Clarke, Drew Russell, Sabrina & Russ Marks 22-7. FED 4’s League: Thursday 31st Ospreys an excellent result away v Q Panthers: 8-0, 26shots-12. Winners: William Holtham, Janet McEneany, Ann Holland, Peter McEneany 20-14, Pam Lockett, June Jones, Ray Clarke, Keith Jones 40-10, Giuseppe Galelli, Margaret Clarke, Scott Malden, Ian Kenyon 26-12. Condors away v SM Mohawks, fought hard for 2pts-6, 32 shots-69. Winners: Jan Pocock, Margaret Morrison, Bill Webb, Drew Russell 15-13. Bazas away v GL Beech, hard fought but unfortunately, 0pts-8 39shots-60. Southern League: Friday 1st Lions home v GL Oaks, another excellent result; 12pts-0, 110 shots-60 Winners: Kath Reid, Pam Lockett, Ian Kenyon 16-13, Bob White, Ann Holland, Ray Pollock 21-19, Margaret Morrison, Keith Phillips, Neil Morrison 17-14, Janet McEneany, Ray Clarke, Peter McEneany 21-9, Colin Jackson, June & Keith Jones 35-5. Tigers, home v ER Mustangs, a great result, 90shots-70, 10pts-2. Winners: Judy Carroll, Bill Webb, Derrick Cooper 18-16, Allen Bowen, Graham Bird, Suzi Cooper 17-10, Ros Holmes, Jan & Brian Pocock 19-10, Shirley Verity, Jo & Jules Pering 25-10. Leopards away v La Manga Crusaders, hard work and some close games but: 0-12, 45shots-125. Pumas, away v LS Silvers, useful points: 6-6, 87shots-97. Winners: Pat Barnes, Mary Fromson, Danny McErlean 24-20, Chris Phillips, Robert Hicks, Lyndon Johnson 18-13, Val & Allan Lever, Tom Fromson 20-17. For information, SLBC website: www.sanluisbowls.byethost7.com or contact June Jones, Club Captain: 691903773.

[libertaddigitalmisiones-blog]

UNIDAD REGIONAL XI, CRIA SECC PRIMERA A. DEL VALLE Y DIV. CDO. RAD. A. DEL VALLE Informa hecho ESCLARECIMIENTO HURTO MOTOCICLETA

UNIDAD REGIONAL XI, CRIA SECC PRIMERA A. DEL VALLE Y DIV. CDO. RAD. A. DEL VALLE Informa hecho ESCLARECIMIENTO HURTO MOTOCICLETA

Raíz fecha, horas 13:00 horas EVELIN BELEN GLIENKE, 25 años, dda. B° Hospital, A.del Valle, DENUNCIO: Que a horas 12:30 constato persona/s Ignorada/s sin ejercer violencia, ingresaron interior su domicilio y sustrajeron la motocicleta marca GUERRERO, modelo G Trip, 110 cc., dominio A058DFY, color negro, N° Chasis 8A2XCHLM5CA064627, N° Motor 1P52FMHC1000025, sin traba en el volante y sin llave…

[brightquang]

Sheriff David Clarke on FISA Warrant and Epstein Case 

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES August Term___________________, 2019 PETITION __________ THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )                                                                             BRIGHT QUANG Respondent )                                                                                                                        Petitioner V. ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )                                                                    Confidential Document: Office of the Democratic Leader )                                                                                                  532272 H-204, US Capitol ) _________ Washington, DC 20515 )                                                                                                                Self Help: (202) 225–0100 )                                                                                                                          Bright Quang V. )                                                                                                                                           217 5th Ave # 8 Honorable Jerrold Nadler )                                                                                                         Redwood City, Chairman of the House Committee )                                                                                                 CA94063 On the Judiciary )                                                                                                                        650–278–9542 2132 Rayburn Building )                                                                                                            bright_qng@yahoo.com Washington, DC 20515 ) (202) 225–5635 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/ ) V. ) Honorable Adam Smith ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Armed Services ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building, ) Washington, D.C. 20515 ) P: (202) 225–4151 | F: (202) 225–9077 ) V. ) Honorable Eliot L. Engel ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Foreign Affairs ) 2170 Rayburn House Office Building ) Washington, DC 20515 ) Phone: (202) 225–5021 ) Fax: (202) 225–5393 ) CAPITAL CASE

QUESTION/PRESENTED I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America’s fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam? II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets? III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let’s understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family — even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves? IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what’s means? TABLE OF PARTIES

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TABLE OF CONTENTS

…………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED………………………………………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA………………………………………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………………………………….…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ……………………………. .…………1 to 161 V. OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………….1 VI. JURISDICTION.…….……………………………………………..……… 2 vii. INTRODUCTION……………………………………….. ………………..…….. 2 IV. BACKGROUND …………………………………………..…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…………………….. .3 Xi. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………96 Vii. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………….159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..………………………..163 to 511 Xiii. ATTACHMENT……………………………………………………………511 to 512 28 U.S. C. § 453 — Oaths of justices ……………………………………………1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257………………………………….……………………1 28 U.S. C§§1254–1651-Jurisdiction………………………………………… 1 H. Res. 309 — Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975……………………………………………………………………..1 S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………………………………………..5 9.11 Particular Rights — First Amendment……………………………..……..6 28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7 22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527…….….8 22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473………………………………………………….9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 461……………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322………21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153; Pub. L. 85–729……………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950…..29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…………………………………….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963………………….32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961……35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance Dec. 20, 1975..………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…………………………………37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfully-influencing.Sep.14,2007…………………..39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5). Definition Aug.16,1954…………………….40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948…………………………….41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950…………………….43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947………………………………46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)©. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972……48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966………………………………………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974…………..…………….………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958………………………………….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………….……………………..…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64 22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961………………………………….…………65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982……………………..66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983……………………….……………….71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals……………..……………………74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D…………………………………………..73 Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73 28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….………………..75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953………………..78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948……79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander…..80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….………………..…………..80 42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………….………………..……………….…………81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998…………………………….82 17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action; Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…………………….87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…………………..89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………………………….91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………………………………92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities; May 22, 1995…………………………………………………………………. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..………………..…….98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism..…………………….………101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………………………..102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)©Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States; July 3,1948…….…………………………………………107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110 28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..………………………….116 28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948.. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948………………………120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948……………… 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122 28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123 28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948…………………………….124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 — Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………….125 28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126 28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129 22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22. Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States to Department of Justice………………………..………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions………………………….……….135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims……………………….137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation……………………..139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory…………………………141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse- March 14, 1980……………………………………………………………….142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement………143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture…………………………………………. ……….145 28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)© — Review of orders and actions. (Added Pub 107–273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.).149 28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

[cancersfakianakis1]

Recovery from anemia and leukocytopenia after abstinence in Japanese alcoholic men and their genetic polymorphisms of alcohol dehydrogenase-1B and aldehyde dehydrogenase-2

<span class="paragraphSection"><div class="boxTitle">Abstract</div><div class="boxTitle">Background</div>The combination of the fast-metabolizing alcohol dehydrogenase-1B (<span style="font-style:italic;">ADH1B*2</span> allele) and inactive heterozygous aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 (<span style="font-style:italic;">ALDH2*1/*2</span>) increases susceptibility to macrocytic anemia and leukocytopenia in alcoholics due to severe acetaldehydemia. More than half of Japanese drinkers with esophageal cancer have this genotype combination.<div class="boxTitle">Methods</div>To assess the recovery of hematologic abnormalities after drinking cessation, changes in blood erythrocyte indices and leukocyte count during 8-week hospital stay were evaluated in 925 Japanese alcoholic men. We used four categories in ascending order for high blood acetaldehyde exposure from drinking: A, <span style="font-style:italic;">ADH1B*1/*1</span> plus <span style="font-style:italic;">ALDH2*1/*1</span>; B, <span style="font-style:italic;">ADH1B*2</span> plus <span style="font-style:italic;">ALDH2*1/*1</span>; C, <span style="font-style:italic;">ADH1B*1/*1</span> plus <span style="font-style:italic;">ALDH2*1/*2</span>; and D, <span style="font-style:italic;">ADH1B*2</span> plus <span style="font-style:italic;">ALDH2*1/*2</span>.<div class="boxTitle">Results</div>Mean values of hemoglobin and hematocrit were the lowest, and those of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) were markedly the highest in the D group on admission, and returning toward normal after abstinence, but the inter-group differences remained significant throughout the 8 weeks. The mean leukocyte count was the lowest in the D group on admission, but increased during 4-week abstinence when the inter-group differences were no longer significant. Frequencies of MCV ≥110 fl (50.5%), hemoglobin levels <11.5 g/dL (32.7%), hemoglobin levels <10.0 g/dL (9.9%) and leukocytopenia <4000/μL (22.8%) were the highest in the D group on the admission day and decreased at the 4-week abstinence (28.7%, 18.8%, 4.0% and 7.9%, respectively). The inter-group differences in frequencies of the severe anemia and leukocytopenia disappeared after 4-week abstinence.<div class="boxTitle">Conclusions</div>Drinking cessation before surgery and/or chemoradiation treatment for esophageal cancer may be effective for recovery from anemia and leukocytopenia in drinkers belonging to the D group.</span> http://ift.tt/2nv2erP

[mechagalaxy]

Sten Hugo Hiller - 627184: Wars. Are they unfair?

By Sten Hugo Hiller - 627184) Wars. Are they unfair?

Yes they are.

But putting the blame solely, or even mostly, on the gaming authorities is plain wrong. Yes they hold the event, and they invite Clans (or Squads or Factions) to participate. But they don't control who participates, or the composition of the clans,

I ask you. Would you want to be willy-nilly taken out of your Clan, placed in another Clan where you don't know most, and told "This is your clan for this event" to make Clans more even and fighting more fair?

The clans we are part of are our friends and family. Those we want to fight alongside, and who in turn want to fight beside us. All clans are different. Some are big, some are small. Some are successful, others less so. To be successful a Clan depends on all its members to do well.

What is doing well?

First off. To be prepared. Updating the formations you will use and having an active HG is part of this. Making sure the formations is the best you can field, and all equipment slots/weapons lots are filled is basic. Perhaps you don't have a lot of friends to fill your HG, but every part helps. And, if you for some reason will be unable to participate, tell the rest of the Clan so they can decide whether to have you along as an inactive or not. AND Being in formation. Being out of formation gives the opponent's free wins.

Secondly. Look at the opponents and their performance. Did that opponent beat you? Look at the footage and see if it was close or a crushing victory. No point attacking a superior opponent and giving the other Clan freebie points. How did they fare vs your Clan mates? Hopefully you know the relative strength of the members of your Clan, and can determine if this is someone you can beat or not. Not launching a doomed attack will help your Clan just as much as a win will.

Thirdly. Use the specialists, and use them wisely.  Let those in the clan who have weaker Main formations, but a strong specialist formation shine.

Fourthly. Be present. Watch out for opponents who are out of formation (perhaps because they attacked one of your low-tonnage specialists and forgot to get back in formation?) or suddenly have an expired HG. Sniping at them while they are weak can give your Clan the edge to win the Battle.

Fifthly. Communicate. If you spot a weakness among the opponents, share it with your Clan mates so they can take advantage of it as well.

And yes. Some Clans are stronger than others. This is partly based on the level of the members and partly -perhaps even mostly, on what Mechs/Weapons/Equipment they have and how they use them.

This is something the gaming authorities have no control over.

What they do is make the fights as fair as they can, based on the sole measurable criteria; Levels.

Admittedly, I don't know what the Levels was when the Clans signed up, and some leveling have undoubtedly taken place.

In this (3339) event the Levels between Battle 1 and 2 was:

Clan...…....Spread…Avg..fighting avg. (- 2 lowest) Div 1 …Warlock: 263-372, 338, --352 .Leviathan: 199-365, 309, --327 .….S.o.B. : 211-351, 259, --266 Death`s C: 133-315, 209 ,--222 Div 2 …B.S.T.H. : 141-223, 183, --212 N. Dragons: 113-305, 170, --181 …...S.H.C. : 104-247, 146, --158 ….T.B.-BW: ..89-265, 147, --156 Div 3 …........SH5: 102-202, 144, --154 Death`s B. : 106-289, 145, --150 …...Heroes: 127-199, 144, --149 ..HF: High. : ..68-182, 138, --149 Div 4 …..B.S.L.R : 124-157, 141, --145 ……..A.o.B. : 120-202, 138, --144 …….Star L. : 128-163, 140, --144 ……..B.S.A. : 111-157, 131, --136 Div 5 Omegas L. : 105-185, 132, --136 ...M&L B.C. : ..88-164, 124, --133 ..m.p. bbq2 : ..76-246, 114, --126 .....Alpha L. : ..55-153, 115, --123 ..Heroes S. : ..91-123, 114, --119 …Mad S. 7 : ..87-136, 113, --119 Death D.A. : ..97-118, 109, --111 …..M&L N. : ..73-122, ..97, --104 Div 6 …......D.o.B. : 70-114, ..96, --103 ….….K.o.C. : 64-166, ..94, --102 …....Phoenix: 74-116, ..98, --102 ….O. T.N.G. : 62-164, ..98, --102 …...…HF: D. : 79-112, ..96, --99 …...Smurf P. : 68-118, ..90, --96 …S. Dragons: 64-124, ..90, --93 …...A. CORE: 59-116, ..84, --90 Div 7 H.S. Brigade: 76-92, ..84, --86 ..Death`s D. : 73-102, 83, --84 ..E. Dragons: 56-119, 79. --82 ……….R.V. : 50-105, 76, --81 ...D. Brigade: 52-89, ..72, --76 ….110 C.C. : 61-86, ..72, --75 ….….Ronins: 61-99, ..70, --73 ……..B.S.B. : 65-77, ..70, --72 Div 8 .....M&L R.A. : 57-77, ..69, --71  ……...H.R.R. : 53-76, ..66, --69 ...…...…...ITC: 41-75, ..61, --66 ..Smurf W.P. : 38-71, ..61, --65 ….Death`s R. : 45-68, ..54, --56 …...JP`s R.B. : 38-70, ..54, --56 ...today and t. : 40-79, ..53, --55 …...M.P.A. R. : 33-59, ..50, --53 Div 9 …...Behemoth: 30-61, ..45, --47  ...H.L. Brigade: 38-53, ..45, --47 …...JC`s R.B. : 35-56, ..44, --46 ……..Major S. : 29-50, ..42, --45 ……clown clan: 35-74, ..42, --44 ……….A.W.B. : 22-60, ..41, --43 ……...Night H. : 31-44, ..36, --38 …..Death`s D. : 33-44, ..37, --38 Div 10 …...R. of Souls: 24-40, ..30, --32 …………..Borg: 17-35, ..28, --30 ......…….I.N.A. : 20-30, ..24, --27 ...………Karma: 16-32, ..21, --22 ......………...J. 2 : 7-20, ..15, --16 ......…….MAGA: 10-22, ..15, --16 ...............C.D.H. : 9-16, ..12, --13 .......House of G. : 8-18, ..10, --11

Uneven divisions? Yes. How uneven? One can look at the highest and lowest fighting average in each division and find Level difference and how much higher in % of Level the top division is compared to the lowest.

Div 1: 130 Levels, +59% Div 2: 56 Levels, +36% Div 3: 5 Levels, 3% Div 4: 9 Levels, 7% Div 5: 32 Levels, 31% Div 6: 13 Levels, 15% Div 7: 14 Levels, 20% Div 8: 18 Levels, 34% Div 9: 9 Levels, 24% Div 10: 23 Levels, 291%

Anything the gaming authorities can do to make it more even, -at least when it comes to levels? Actually there is one or two things that can be done, but the cures might well prove to be worse than the disease.

Back in the mist of time when Northwind Higlanders and Cyberstorm was the two superclans, the top division was set up just for them.  Going back to that? I think not. The situation will not improve significantly for the rest of the Clans, someone else will dominate Div 2 and the two top clans get better prizes than any other Clan. Besides, how fun will it be for them to fight 3 battles vs the same Clan?

Another option is to make all Divisions 4 Clan Divisions.  In this event it would have reduced the spread significantly from Division 5 and downward. There are some drawbacks to this as well. Here 6 more Clans would have gotten Gold, 6 fewer Silver, 6 fewer Bronze and 6 more Plastic. If your Clan gains it might look good, but consider effects on prizes if we had 16 clans in this event. Betting would get somewhat harder as well.

Also, as mentioned. Some Clans are much stronger than others at roughly the same Level average. Smaller Divisions will make it even easier for them to dominate a Division.

Anything the clans can do to make it more even?

Look at the spread in most of the Clans. Having one or two superhitters that can bash everyone is good, but if that puts the Clan in a Division where none of the others can get a win, it isnt so good anymore. Same when it comes to stragglers, those well below the clan average. Most of the time they are easy targets for opponents around your Clans average.

Not that I advocate radical changes in your Clan structure, but who the Clan consists of is the result of choiches you, the players have done. If that results in bad placements in the wars, perhaps you should see what you can do yourself before you start blaming the gaming authorities

As in real life. In a war some will win. Sometimes because they are superior, other times because the opponents make mistakes. The good thing about these wars is you never loose anything. Your forces is still there, and if you did an effort you will get some prizes for it.

See (some of you) on the Battlefield.

[brightquang]

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

August Term___________________, 2019

PETITION

__________

THE UNITED  STATES OF AMERICA ) BRIGHT QUANG  Respondent ) Petitioner  V. )  Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ) Confidential Document:   Office of the Democratic Leader ) 532272

H-204, US Capitol ) _________

Washington, DC 20515 ) Self Help:

(202) 225–0100 ) Bright Quang

V. ) 217 5th  Ave # 8 Honorable Jerrold Nadler ) Redwood City,

Chairman of the House Committee ) CA94063

On the Judiciary ) 650–278–9542

2132 Rayburn Building ) bright_qng@yahoo.com

Washington, DC 20515 )

(202) 225–5635 )  Website: https://nadler.house.gov/ )

V. )

Honorable Adam Smith ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Armed Services ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building, ) Washington, D.C. 20515 ) P: (202) 225–4151 | F: (202) 225–9077 )

V. )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel )

Chairman of the House Committee )

On Foreign Affairs )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building )  Washington, DC 20515 )  Phone: (202) 225–5021 )  Fax: (202) 225–5393 )

CAPITAL CASE    QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America’s fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United  States of America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let’s understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family — even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what’s means?

TABLE OF PARTIES    THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA

TABLE OF CONTENTS     …………………………………………………………………………………page  I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED………………………………………………….. i   II.THE UNITED STATES  OF AMERICA………………………………………. i  III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………………………………….…..…IV to VI   IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ……………………………. .…………1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………….1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….……………………………………………..……… 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……………………………………….. ………………..…….. 2  IV. BACKGROUND …………………………………………..…………….….. 3  V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…………………….. .3

Xi. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………96

Vii. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………….159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..………………………..163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT……………………………………………………………511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 — Oaths of justices ……………………………………………1  28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254–1651-Jurisdiction………………………………………… 1

H. Res. 309 — Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975……………………………………………………………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………………………………………..5

9.11 Particular Rights — First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527…….….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105.  Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473………………………………………………….9  22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461……………………………………………………………………..19  18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322………21  10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729……………………………………………………………….23  22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950…………………………………………………………………………..29  H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…………………………………….30  H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963………………….32  22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961……………………………………….……………………………………35  22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..………………………………………………………………….36  5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…………………………………37  18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfully-influencing.Sep.14,2007…………………..39  26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5). Definition Aug.16,1954…………………….40  28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948…………………………….41   1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950…………………….43  1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947………………………………46  1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)©. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972………………………………………………………………………………48  37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966………………………………………… ………..51  5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974…………..…………….………….……53  38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958………………………………….…56  38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………….……………………..…………59  1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961………………………………….…………65  35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982……………………..66  9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983……………………….……………….71  42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals……………..……………………74  VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D…………………………………………..73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….………………..75  California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953………………..78  18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948……79  California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander…..80  §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….………………..…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference;   Aug. 14, 1935…………………….………………..……………….…………81  17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998…………………………….82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84  42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…………………….87  CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…………………..89  CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………………………….91  28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………………………………92  44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995…………………………………………………………………. 96  5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..………………..…….98  S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism..…………………….………101  50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………………………..102  50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)©Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United  States; July 3,1948…….…………………………………………107  28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure……………………………………………………………………114  28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..………………………….116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948.. 117  28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948………………………120  28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948……………… 120  28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948…………………………….124  28 U.S.C. § 2678 — Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………….125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice………………………..………134  22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions………………………….……….135  22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims……………………….137  22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation……………………..139  22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory…………………………141  22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980……………………………………………………………….142   22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement………143  18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture…………………………………………. ……….145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)© — Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107–273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)…………………………………………………………………..149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

[brightquang]

Ancient Aliens: Was Poseidon an Alien? (Season 8) | History

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

August Term___________________, 2019

PETITION

__________

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) BRIGHT QUANG Respondent ) Petitioner V. ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ) Confidential Document: Office of the Democratic Leader ) 532272

H-204, US Capitol ) _________

Washington, DC 20515 ) Self Help:

(202) 225–0100 ) Bright Quang

V. ) 217 5th Ave # 8 Honorable Jerrold Nadler ) Redwood City,

Chairman of the House Committee ) CA94063

On the Judiciary ) 650–278–9542

2132 Rayburn Building ) bright_qng@yahoo.com

Washington, DC 20515 )

(202) 225–5635 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/ )

V. )

Honorable Adam Smith ) Chairman of the House Committee ) On Armed Services ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building, ) Washington, D.C. 20515 ) P: (202) 225–4151 | F: (202) 225–9077 )

V. )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel )

Chairman of the House Committee )

On Foreign Affairs )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building ) Washington, DC 20515 ) Phone: (202) 225–5021 ) Fax: (202) 225–5393 )

CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America’s fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let’s understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family — even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what’s means?

TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

TABLE OF CONTENTS …………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED………………………………………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA………………………………………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………………………………….…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ……………………………. .…………1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW……………………………………………………………….1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….……………………………………………..……… 2

vii. INTRODUCTION………………���…………………….. ………………..…….. 2 IV. BACKGROUND …………………………………………..…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…………………….. .3

Xi. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………96

Vii. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………….159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..………………………..163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT……………………………………………………………511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 — Oaths of justices ……………………………………………1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254–1651-Jurisdiction………………………………………… 1

H. Res. 309 — Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975……………………………………………………………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………………………………………..5

9.11 Particular Rights — First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527…….….8 22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473………………………………………………….9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461……………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322………21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729……………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950…………………………………………………………………………..29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…………………………………….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963………………….32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961……………………………………….……………………………………35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…………………………………37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfully-influencing.Sep.14,2007…………………..39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5). Definition Aug.16,1954…………………….40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948…………………………….41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950…………………….43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947………………………………46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)©. United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972………………………………………………………………………………48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966………………………………………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974…………..…………….………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958………………………………….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………….……………………..…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961………………………………….…………65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982……………………..66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983……………………….……………….71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals……………..……………………74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D…………………………………………..73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….………………..75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953………………..78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948……79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander…..80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….………………..…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………….………………..……………….…………81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998…………………………….82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…………………….87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…………………..89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………………………….91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………………………………92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995…………………………………………………………………. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..………………..…….98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..…………………….………101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………………………..102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)©Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948…….…………………………………………107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure……………………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..………………………….116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of Claims; June 25, 1948.. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948………………………120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948……………… 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948…………………………….124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 — Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………….125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice………………………..………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions………………………….……….135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims……………………….137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation……………………..139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory…………………………141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980……………………………………………………………….142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement………143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture…………………………………………. ……….145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)© — Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107–273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)…………………………………………………………………..149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

[brightquang]

4 Awesome Discoveries You Probably Didn’t Hear About - Episode 32

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

 August Term___________________, 2019

  PETITION

__________

 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   )           BRIGHT QUANG      Respondent                                          )               Petitioner V.                                                                ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )  Confidential Document:        Office of the Democratic Leader            )           532272

  H-204, US Capitol                                       )             _________  

  Washington, DC 20515                               )     Self Help:

(202) 225-0100                                 )    Bright Quang      

V.                                                                     )       217 5th Ave # 8      Honorable Jerrold Nadler                               )       Redwood  City,

Chairman of the House Committee               )        CA94063

On the Judiciary                                             )     650–278–9542                                                                                                          

2132 Rayburn Building                                ) bright_qng@yahoo.com                      

Washington, DC 20515                                   )

(202) 225-5635                                                 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/                 )

V.                                                                    )

Honorable Adam Smith                                  ) Chairman of the House Committee               ) On Armed Services                                        ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building,                   ) Washington, D.C. 20515                                         ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077                    )

V.                                                                     )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel                                     )

Chairman of the House Committee                   )

On Foreign Affairs                                              )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building                 ) Washington, DC 20515                                        ) Phone: (202) 225-5021                                         ) Fax: (202) 225-5393                                             )

             CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

 II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of  America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

 III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what  masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

 IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?

                            TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                           ……………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED…………..........................…………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA…….....................….........………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………..................................…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ .….........1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW………………………………………….........................1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….………….................................………….....……... 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……......................................... …………….....……..   2 IV. BACKGROUND   …………………................................…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND………....................... .3

Xi. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................96

Vii. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1

H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5

9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of

Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980........................................................................................142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

 https://qr.ae/TWAAbs

[brightquang]

Bernard Kerik on Trump's Defense of Rudy Giuliani

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

 August Term___________________, 2019

  PETITION

__________

 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   )           BRIGHT QUANG      Respondent                                          )               Petitioner V.                                                                ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )  Confidential Document:        Office of the Democratic Leader            )           532272

  H-204, US Capitol                                       )             _________  

  Washington, DC 20515                               )     Self Help:

(202) 225-0100                                 )    Bright Quang      

V.                                                                     )       217 5th Ave # 8      Honorable Jerrold Nadler                               )       Redwood  City,

Chairman of the House Committee               )        CA94063

On the Judiciary                                             )     650–278–9542                                                                                                          

2132 Rayburn Building                                ) bright_qng@yahoo.com                      

Washington, DC 20515                                   )

(202) 225-5635                                                 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/                 )

V.                                                                    )

Honorable Adam Smith                                  ) Chairman of the House Committee               ) On Armed Services                                        ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building,                   ) Washington, D.C. 20515                                         ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077                    )

V.                                                                     )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel                                     )

Chairman of the House Committee                   )

On Foreign Affairs                                              )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building                 ) Washington, DC 20515                                        ) Phone: (202) 225-5021                                         ) Fax: (202) 225-5393                                             )

             CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

 II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of  America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

 III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what  masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

 IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?

                            TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                           ……………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED…………..........................…………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA…….....................….........………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………..................................…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ .….........1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW………………………………………….........................1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….………….................................………….....……... 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……......................................... …………….....……..   2 IV. BACKGROUND   …………………................................…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND………....................... .3

Xi. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................96

Vii. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1

H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5

9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of

Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980........................................................................................142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

 https://qr.ae/TWAAbs

[brightquang]

Andrew Brunson Discusses his Imprisonment in Turkey

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

 August Term___________________, 2019

  PETITION

__________

 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   )           BRIGHT QUANG      Respondent                                          )               Petitioner V.                                                                ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )  Confidential Document:        Office of the Democratic Leader            )           532272

  H-204, US Capitol                                       )             _________  

  Washington, DC 20515                               )     Self Help:

(202) 225-0100                                 )    Bright Quang      

V.                                                                     )       217 5th Ave # 8      Honorable Jerrold Nadler                               )       Redwood  City,

Chairman of the House Committee               )        CA94063

On the Judiciary                                             )     650–278–9542                                                                                                          

2132 Rayburn Building                                ) bright_qng@yahoo.com                      

Washington, DC 20515                                   )

(202) 225-5635                                                 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/                 )

V.                                                                    )

Honorable Adam Smith                                  ) Chairman of the House Committee               ) On Armed Services                                        ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building,                   ) Washington, D.C. 20515                                         ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077                    )

V.                                                                     )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel                                     )

Chairman of the House Committee                   )

On Foreign Affairs                                              )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building                 ) Washington, DC 20515                                        ) Phone: (202) 225-5021                                         ) Fax: (202) 225-5393                                             )

             CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

 II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of  America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

 III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what  masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

 IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?

                            TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                           ……………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED…………..........................…………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA…….....................….........………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………..................................…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ .….........1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW………………………………………….........................1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….………….................................………….....……... 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……......................................... …………….....……..   2 IV. BACKGROUND   …………………................................…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND………....................... .3

Xi. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................96

Vii. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1

H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5

9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review.Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of

Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by a federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. The exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to the Department of Justice……………………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980........................................................................................142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

[brightquang]

Bill O'Reilly Talking Points #257

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

 August Term___________________, 2019

  PETITION

__________

 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   )           BRIGHT QUANG      Respondent                                          )               Petitioner V.                                                                ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )  Confidential Document:        Office of the Democratic Leader            )           532272

  H-204, US Capitol                                       )             _________  

  Washington, DC 20515                               )     Self Help:

(202) 225-0100                                 )    Bright Quang      

V.                                                                     )       217 5th Ave # 8      Honorable Jerrold Nadler                               )       Redwood  City,

Chairman of the House Committee               )        CA94063

On the Judiciary                                             )     650–278–9542                                                                                                          

2132 Rayburn Building                                ) bright_qng@yahoo.com                      

Washington, DC 20515                                   )

(202) 225-5635                                                 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/                 )

V.                                                                    )

Honorable Adam Smith                                  ) Chairman of the House Committee               ) On Armed Services                                        ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building,                   ) Washington, D.C. 20515                                         ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077                    )

V.                                                                     )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel                                     )

Chairman of the House Committee                   )

On Foreign Affairs                                              )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building                 ) Washington, DC 20515                                        ) Phone: (202) 225-5021                                         ) Fax: (202) 225-5393                                             )

             CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

 II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of  America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

 III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what  masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

 IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?

                            TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                           ……………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED…………..........................…………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA…….....................….........………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………..................................…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ .….........1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW………………………………………….........................1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….………….................................………….....……... 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……......................................... …………….....……..   2 IV. BACKGROUND   …………………................................…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUN………....................... .3

Xi. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................96

Vii. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1

H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5

9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of

Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980........................................................................................142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151

[brightquang]

Greenland Ice Sheet is sliding more than anyone realized, impacting sea ...

https://qr.ae/TWsAlg

US CONGRESS REPRESENTATIVES

 August Term___________________, 2019

  PETITION

__________

 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA   )           BRIGHT QUANG      Respondent                                          )               Petitioner V.                                                                ) Honorable House Speaker Nancy Pelosi )  Confidential Document:        Office of the Democratic Leader            )           532272

  H-204, US Capitol                                       )             _________  

  Washington, DC 20515                               )     Self Help:

(202) 225-0100                                 )    Bright Quang      

V.                                                                     )       217 5th Ave # 8      Honorable Jerrold Nadler                               )       Redwood  City,

Chairman of the House Committee               )        CA94063

On the Judiciary                                             )     650–278–9542                                                                                                          

2132 Rayburn Building                                ) bright_qng@yahoo.com                      

Washington, DC 20515                                   )

(202) 225-5635                                                 ) Website: https://nadler.house.gov/                 )

V.                                                                    )

Honorable Adam Smith                                  ) Chairman of the House Committee               ) On Armed Services                                        ) 2216 Rayburn House Office Building,                   ) Washington, D.C. 20515                                         ) P: (202) 225-4151 | F: (202) 225-9077                    )

V.                                                                     )

Honorable Eliot L. Engel                                     )

Chairman of the House Committee                   )

On Foreign Affairs                                              )

2170 Rayburn House Office Building                 ) Washington, DC 20515                                        ) Phone: (202) 225-5021                                         ) Fax: (202) 225-5393                                             )

             CAPITAL CASE QUESTION/PRESENTED

I. How does he exactly take cognizance about to super legalistic values of the United States Treaties and International Agreements of the United States of America and the Republic of Vietnam to have solemnly declared in the protocols international relations when the proxy war of America's fighting against communism to take place in South Vietnam?

 II. What did his family and he grant for a livelihood when the Government of the United States of  America has left him on the battlefield of the Vietnam War without had regrets?

 III. How somehow does he firmly respectfully protect the statutorily of the United States of America to let's understand about the burden of sufferings and unluckiness of the plaintiff- family - even though, his human dignity was humiliated by his allied partnership and to what  masterminded the American leaders of the Vietnam War had self- confessed doing wrongful action in themselves?

 IV. Whether the United States of America expresses exactly the righteousness, the human rights, the ethics, and the equality of the US Constitution, if not, the Justice of the arrogance of negligence of undisciplined-soldier of bankruptcy, and of the United States in the Vietnam War of prisoner of war for what's means?

                            TABLE OF PARTIES THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

                          TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                                           ……………………………………………………………………………………page I.QUESTIONS /PRESENTED…………..........................…………………….. i II.THE UNITED STATES OF  AMERICA…….....................….........………. i III.TABLE OF AUTHORITIES …………..................................…..…IV to VI IV.STATEMENT OF THE CASE ........................................ .….........1 to 161

V. OPINIONS BELOW………………………………………….........................1

VI. JURISDICTION.…….………….................................………….....……... 2

vii. INTRODUCTION……......................................... …………….....……..   2 IV. BACKGROUND   …………………................................…………….….. 3 V. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUN………....................... .3

Xi. DISCUSSION..........................................................................................96

Vii. CONCLUSION.....................................................................................159 Xii. APPENDIX..…………………………………..…..........................163 to 511

Xiii. ATTACHMENT........................................................................511 to 512

28 U.S. C. § 453 - Oaths of justices ...............................................................1 28 U.S.C§§ 1254- 1257……………………………………….……………………1

28 U.S. C§§1254-1651-Jurisdiction............................................................... 1

H. Res. 309 – Recognizing the 44th anniversary of the Fall of Saigon on

April 30, 1975…………………………………………………...…………………..1

S. 484 BRING THEM HOME ALIVE….………….........................................5

9.11 Particular Rights – First Amendment……………………………..……..6

28 U.S.C §1346b –June25,1948………………………………………………….7

22 U.S.C § 2451 — Pub. L 87–256§ 101, Sept. 21, 1961, 75 Stat.527.......….8  22 U.S.C. § 7103. Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, § 105. Oct. 28, 2000–114 Stat. 1473.........................................................................9 22. U.S.C§ 2403.Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, § 644, Sept. 4, 1961,

75 Stat. 461………………………………………………………………………..19 18 U.S.C§ 2381, June 25,1948,Ch.645, 62 Stat 807; Pub L 103–322.........21 10 U.S.C § 2733.[a] Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 153;

Pub. L. 85–729…………………………………………………………………….23 22 U.S.C§§1571_1604. Pub. L 329–81st Congress, 63 Stat 714.Dec. 23,1950...........................................................................................................29 H.R.5490 Foreign Assistance Act of 1963…….................................…...….30 H.R.7885- Pub. L, 88–205. Approved- December 16, 1963.........................32 22 USC§ 2151(a)(b) Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, § 101, formerly § 102, Sept.4, 1961…………………………………………….………………………………......35 22 U.S.C.§ 2151n- Human Rights and development Assistance

Dec. 20, 1975..……………………………………………………………………………….36 5 U.S.C. §702 -Right of Review .Sep. 6,1966…….......................................37 18 U.S.C. § 227(a)-Wrongfullyinfluencing.Sep.14,2007.............................39 26 U.S.C. § 7701(a)(1)(2)(5).Definition Aug.16,1954..................................40 28 U.S.C. § 1621-Perjury general-June 25, 1948........................................41 1 U.S.C.§ 112 a United States Treaties.- Sept. 23, 1950............................43 1 U.S.C.§ 112-General Provision-July 30,1947….......................................46 1 U.S.C.§ 112.b(a) (b)(c). United States International agreement-Aug. 22, 1972...............................................................................................................48 37 U.S.C§ 552; Sep. 6, 1966…………...........................…………… ………..51 5 U.S.C. § 552 a-December 31,1974……….....…...................………….……53 38 U.S.C. § 101-Definitions. Sep.2, 1958…………...........................…….…56 38 U.S. Code § 1311 -July 30, 1947………....….............................…………59 1 U.S. Code § 113. “Little and Brown’s” July 30, 1947………………..……64

22U.S.C.§7108. — Sep.22, 1961...…………………………………….…...……65 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to compensation. April 2, 1982................................66 9.Civil Rights Action-42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………….......…................71 42 U.S. Code § 1983.Civil action for deprivation of rights.……… …….…72

42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims against individuals…...…….....……..................74 VI CRA of 1964–42 U.S.C. § 2000 D...........................................................73

Or 9.Civil Rights Actions_42 U.S.C. § 1983…………………………………73

28 U.S.C. § 4101-Definitions; Aug. 10, 2010……………….…....................75 California Vehicle Code Section 14103, 14105, and 13953…....................78 18 U.S.C. §1705 — Destruction of letter boxes or mail; June 25, 1948......79 California Civil Code§§§ 44, 45 a, and 46-Defamation, Libel, Slander.....80 §46 Division 1. Person [38–86]………………….……………........…………..80

42 U.S.C. § 1395- Prohibition against any Federal interference; Aug. 14, 1935…………………....………………….....……………….………...81 17 U.S.C. § 1203 Civil remedies; Oct. 28, 1998………………...................82

17 U.S.C. § 411-Registration and Civil infringement action;

Oct. 19, 1976.. ………………………………………………………………….84 42 U.S.C. §12101- Findings and purpose; July 26, 1990…......................87 CACI Nos. 3940–3949-DAMAGES-………………………..…….................89 CACI NO:3949.Punitive Damages_ Individual……………......................91 28 U.S.C. § 1871 Fees; June 25, 1948…………………....………...............92 44 U.S.C. § 3507- Public information collection activities;

May 22, 1995.............................................................................................. 96 5 U.S.C. § 3579-Student loan repayments-…………..…....................…....98 S 2040 Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism ..………................……...101 50 U.S.C. §4105- Prisoners of War-June 24, 1970;………….................102 50 U.S.C. §4101 (a)(b)(c)Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States; July 3,1948.......…................................................…107 28 U.S.C § 1346 [32] the United States as the defendant…..…..……..110

28 U.S.C Section1346b -June 25, 1948-Chapter 171_Tort Claims Procedure…..................………………………………………………………114 28 U.S.C. §2671- Definitions-June 25, 1948;…..……..................….......116

28 U.S.C. §2672- Administrative adjustment of

Claims; June 25, 1948…………………………………………………..….. 117 28 U.S.C. §2673- Report to Congress-June 25, 1948…………...............120 28 U.S.C. §2674 Liability of United States-June 25, 1948…............... 120 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Disposition by federal agency as

Prerequisite; evidence…………………………………………………….….122

28 U.S. Code § 2676 Judgment as bar……………………….………….…123

28 U.S.C. §2677- Compromise-June 25, 1948……..................................124 28 U.S.C. § 2678 - Attorney fees; penalty…………………….…………....125

28 U.S. Code § 2679. Exclusiveness of remedy ………………..……. .….126

28 U.S. Code § 2680. Exceptions…………………………………..………..129

22 U.S.C. § 1622 a-U.S. Code — Un-annotated Title 22.

Transfer of Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of

the United States to Department of Justice……………………………134 22 U.S.C. § 1622 b- Transfer of functions……………….............….......135 22 U.S.C. § 1622c- Membership of Foreign Claims…………................137 22 U.S.C. § 1622d- Appointment and compensation.............................139 22 U.S.C. § 1622e- Vesting of all non-adjudicatory……........................141 22 U.S.C. § 1622f-Foreign Relations and Intercourse-

March 14, 1980........................................................................................142 22 U.S.C. § 1622 g-Independence of Foreign Claims Settlement.........143 18 U.S.C. § 2340 A- Torture………………………........…............. ..........145

28 U.S. C. § 357(a)(b)(c) - Review of orders and actions.

(Added Pub 107-273 div.C. title I, §11042 (a), Nov.2,2002, 116 Stat.1853.)...............................................................................................149

28 U.S. Code § 1502- [35] Treaty cases………….………………………..151