#Arvind Kejriwal Fraud | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

mrodataclassification · 3 years

Text

10 things that prove Kejriwal is the biggest fraud in Indian Politics.

Arvind Kejriwal has been a habitual liar in prospect to his official ranking and his party AAP’s policies. He is well known among the citizens as the man of U-Turns. There have been quite a few incidents where his declaration over the media has changed as per the requirement of the situation. Although the number of his lies far exceeds the number of days his party AAP has existed, we take a look at 10 of them that we find more worth sharing.

1. Anna Hazare’s movement was a copy of the World Bank Agenda. The main motive for this anti-corruption movement was to increase the penetration of international capital in India. Anna’s team members Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia run an NGO called Kabir, which had received $400,000 from Ford foundation. Later Kejriwal accepted in a Business Standard interview, that his NGO Kabir had received 4Lakh USD from the Ford Foundation.

2. Kejriwal had protested in Delhi asking for justice for Nirbhaya and strict punishment for rapists. On the other side, he gave a Loksabha ticket from south Bangalore to Nina P. Nayak. Nina had supported and fought for a lesser punishment for the Nirbahya Killer and most brutal rapist Muhammad Afroz. It was Muhammad Afroz who had double raped Nirbhaya, inserted Iron rot in her body, took out her intestines. Due to brutal assault by Afroz, Nirbhaya had died. Arvind Kejriwal has given justice to Nirbhaya by giving a Loksabha ticket to the savior of her rapist and murder.

3. Taking amiss at a remark by Arvind Kejriwal in 2013 that he chose to work in the public sector over being an income tax officer and earning crore. The Indian revenue service (Income tax) all India body, in an exclusive two-page letter points to Arvind Kejriwal that he had never worked on the position of IT Commissioner. In fact, his batch till date has not been promoted to that position. His unnecessary utterance was damaging their image of fine service.

4. Arvind Kejriwal said he supported the cause of poor farmers and understood their plight. Yogesh Dahia, involved in a 300 Crore scam of farmer's money is now a member of the AAP agriculture reform committee and he got the ticket from Saharanpur. The petitioners had alleged that Dahiya, who is a member of Lok Sabha, along with the then ADM Randhir Singh Chauhan and GAIL AGM K P Singh acquired the land for the GAIL pipeline, siphoned off over Rs 300 crore by not paying the adequate compensation to the farmers. In fact, 44 AAP candidates, including Mr. Kejriwal, have criminal cases against them.

5. Arvind Kejriwal said Robert Vadra should be jailed and he said he supported Ashok Kemka. Ashok Khemka had exposed Robert Vadra's illegal land deals. After Vadra was exposed, the Congress party transferred Ashok Khemka and put Yudhvir Khyalia in his place. Yudhvir made all illegal deals of Robert Vadra legal and restored all licenses of Vadra and created a charge sheet against Ashok Kemka. AAP gave a ticket to Yudhvir and now he is a member of the AAP land acquisition committee!

6. Arvind Kejriwal said he would never give the ticket to corrupt and criminals. We have seen so many instances where his candidates are criminals and corrupt both. In total 44 AAP candidates so far have criminal cases against them. M. Pushparayan from the Thoothukuddi constituency has assets worth Rs. 87lahhs, NIL Liabilities, and 380 cases filed against him. Udaykumar s. p. from the Kanyakumari constituency has assets worth Rs. 2 crores, liabilities of rs 2 lakhs, and 382 cases filed against him.

7. Arvind Kejriwal along with Shazia Ilmi in his speech at CII said that during his 49 days government there was a reduction in corruption. This information was provided by an ex-employee Transparency international. Later Transparency international sent letters and clarified that they never conducted any such surveys and there were no unpublished reports.

8. Arvind Kejriwal has given Anjali Damania a LokSabha ticket from Nagpur, Maharastra. She was involved in the irrigation land scam with her partners Switu Mehta and Vanita Ahluwalia. When people had questioned about Anjali Damania Land scams, Kejriwal called her an ordinary volunteer, but later gave her a LokSabha ticket!

9. Kejriwal on camera said no sitting MLA from his party will fight the 2014 general election but now he himself (a Delhi MLA) going to fight Loksabha election.

10. The Delhi Chief Minister had promised to pass the Jan Lokpal Bill within 15 days of Government formation. But nothing was done. In fact, it backtracked saying that the Central Government had issued a directive which is why they were unable to pass the Bill in Delhi Vidhan Sabha. The truth is, the Central Government had issued the directive on Jan Lokpal Bill a long time back. Arvind Kejriwal was aware of this even before the elections in Delhi happened.

Visit: PGurus

#kejriwal govt #arvind kejriwal #10 lies #Delhi #narendra modi

0 notes

popularnews · 4 years

Photo

Amarinder Singh's New Attack On Arvind Kejriwal: A Big Fraud

0 notes

bbcbreakingnews · 4 years

Text

How politics over farmers protest is playing out in Punjab between Arvind Kejriwal, Congress and SAD

NEW DELHI: While farmers are protesting on Delhi borders for the past three weeks, the politics on their agitation is being played out in Punjab. The three main political parties – the ruling Congress, main opposition Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) are squabbling among themselves. The prime reason behind this fight between the Congress, AAP and SAD is that the farmers’ agitation is being led and dominated by the agriculturalists from Punjab. The three parties are seen outdoing each other in a bid to be seen as the best sympathiser of the farmers. The second reason is that power in Punjab has been alternating usually between the Congress and SAD-BJP combine for the last few years. However, AAP made a surprise entry into the state’s electoral politics in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections by winning four of the 13 seats in the state. In the 2017 Punjab assembly elections, it won 20 of the 117 seats, coming a distant second to the Congress which bagged 77 seats. With the SAD-BJP combine winning 18 seats – two seats lesser than AAP – the status of the main opposition party went to Kejriwal’s party. No wonder both Congress and SAD are attacking AAP, as they feel threatened by the latter which seems to have a potential to take a larger share of the political cake. Both Congress and SAD have come down heavily on Kejriwal ever since he tore the agriculture laws during the Delhi assembly session on Thursday to show his anguish over the Acts and to extend support to the farmers. On Thursday itself, SAD leader and former Union minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal slammed Kejriwal. She accused him of indulging in “cheap theatrics”. She pointed out that the AAP government in Delhi was among the first to notify one of the central laws related to agriculture. In a statement, she said though Kejriwal was known as a “dramebaaz”, on this occasion he had indulged in “cheap theatrics” and “unparalleled hypocrisy” by tearing the same laws in the Delhi assembly, one of which he had notified on November 23. On Friday, it was the turn of Congress to attack Kejriwal and SAD both. Punjab chief minister Amarinder Singh mocked Kejriwal calling him a “big fraud” and the act of tearing the copies of the farm laws as double standards. Singh called Kejriwal’s act as “theatrics” as the Delhi government had given approval to the “black farm laws” by notifying one of them last month. “The Aam Aadmi Party leader is indulging in petty politics now,” he said. “This shows Kejriwal and the AAP have a different face for the people, with totally contrarian intentions hidden inside,” Singh said. Singh alleged that both AAP and SAD were a “bunch of hypocrites whose double standards on the farm laws had exposed their lack of commitment to the farmers”.

source https://bbcbreakingnews.com/2020/12/19/how-politics-over-farmers-protest-is-playing-out-in-punjab-between-arvind-kejriwal-congress-and-sad/

0 notes

ajabhishekvideos · 4 years

Text

Amarinder Singh's New Attack On Arvind Kejriwal: A Big Fraud

Amarinder Singh’s New Attack On Arvind Kejriwal: A Big Fraud

Amarinder Singh accused Arvind Kejriwal of double standards (File) Chandigarh: The exchange of attacks and retorts between Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh and Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal over the three contentious agriculture laws continued on Friday. The Congress leader has intensified his tirade against the Delhi Chief Minister as he called him a ” big fraud”. In a statement,…

View On WordPress

0 notes

loyallogic · 5 years

Text

What is Defamation

This article is written by Rishabh soni, 3rd-year law student Amity law school Delhi. He discusses the concept of defamation in detail.

Introduction

Defamation as the meaning of the word suggests is an injury to the reputation of a person resulting from a statement which is false. A man’s reputation is treated as his property and if any person poses damage to property he is liable under the law, similarly, a person injuring the reputation of a person is also liable under the law. Defamation is defined in section 499 of Indian Penal Code 1860 and section 500 provides that a person committing an offense under this section is liable with simple imprisonment for a term of 2 years or fine or with both.

Essentials of Defamation

A. The statement must be defamatory

The very first essential of the offense of defamation is that the statement must be defamatory i.e. which tends to lower the reputation of the plaintiff. The test to check if a particular statement is defamatory or not will depend upon how the right thinking members of society are likely to take it. Further, a person cannot take a defense that the statement was not intended to be defamatory, although it caused a feeling of hatred, contempt or dislike.

click above

In the Case of Ram Jethmalani v. Subramanian Swamy court held Dr. Swamy to be liable for defaming Mr. Jethmalani by saying that he received money from a banned organization to protect the then CM of Tamil Nadu in the case of the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. In another recent case of Arun Jaitley v Arvind Kejriwal, the court held the statement said by Arvind Kejriwal and his 5 other leaders to be defamatory. However, the matter was finally disclosed after all the defendants apologized for their actions.

Illustration

A publishes an advertisement in a local newspaper stating false information that the company of B has committed fraud of Rs 20,00,000. Now, this statement will amount to defamation as this newspaper will be read by many readers and will surely injure the reputation of B’s company.

However, it is to be noted that mere hasty expression spoken in anger, or vulgar abuse to which no hearer would attribute any set purpose to injure the character would not amount to defaming a person.

Illustration

If A an employer scolds his employee B for not coming on time in front of the whole staff, then B cannot take the plea that A has injured the reputation of B.

B. The statement must refer to the plaintiff

In an action for defamation, the plaintiff has to prove that the statement of which he Complains referred to him, it will be immaterial that the defendant did not intend to defame the plaintiff. If the person to whom the statement was published could reasonably infer that the statement referred to him, the defendant will then be liable

Illustration- If A, a bank publishes a notice to all its branches to not give the loan to any person from xyz as the people of xyz are more often repeated defaulters. Now due to this B, a resident of xyz has suffered a huge loss. Now B can hold A liable for defaming him although the bank did not directly focus on him.

In the case of T.V., Ramasubha Iyer v. A.M.A Mohindeen Court held the defendants liable for publishing a statement without any intention to defame the defendants. The statement mentioned that a particular person carrying business of Agarbathis to Ceylon has been arrested for the offense of smuggling. The plaintiff was also one of the person carrying on a similar business, and as a result of this statement his reputation also severely damaged.

C. The statement must be published

Publication of defamatory statement to some person other than the person defamed is a most important aspect for making any person liable, and unless that is done, no action for defamation will lie.

However, if a third person wrongfully reads a letter meant for the plaintiff, then the defendant likely to be liable. But if the defamatory letter sent to the plaintiff is likely to be read by somebody else, there will be a valid publication.

In the case of Mahendra Ram v. Harnandan prasad the defendant was held liable for sending a defamatory letter to plaintiff written in Urdu knowing that the plaintiff did not knew Urdu and the letter will very likely be read over by another person.

Forms of Defamation

Slander– It is the publication of a defamatory statement in a transient form For example- Defaming a person by way of words or gestures.

Libel– It is the representation made in some permanent form.

For example- Defaming a person through a representation made in some permanent form like writing, printing etc.

English law on libel and slander

Under English criminal law, libel is treated as a crime but slander is not. Slander is only a civil wrong. This distinction between libel and slander is mainly on two reasons-

Under Criminal law, only libel has been recognized as an offense. Slander is no offense.

Under the law of torts, slander is actionable, except in few cases where special damage has to be proved. Libel is always actionable i.e. without any proof. However, slander is also actionable in the following 4 cases:

Imputation of a criminal offense to the plaintiff.

Imputation of an infectious disease to the plaintiff which has the effect of preventing others from associating with the plaintiff. Example A makes a statement in his office that his colleague is suffering from AIDS. He can here be liable for defaming his colleague.

The imputation that a person is incompetent, dishonest or unfit in regard to the office, profession, trade or business carried on by him.

Imputation of unchastity or adultery to any woman or girl.

Indian law on Libel and Slander

Unlike English law, Indian law does not make any distinction between libel and slander and both are treated as criminal offenses under section 499 IPC. In the case of Hirabai Jehangir v. Dinshawdulji the Bombay and Madras high court both held that no distinction needs to be made between treating libel and slander as criminal offenses.

Innuendo

A statement is prima facie defamatory when its natural and obvious meaning leads to that conclusion. Sometimes it may happen that the statement was prima facie innocent but because of some secondary meaning, it may be considered to be defamatory. For this secondary instance plaintiff must prove the secondary meaning i.e. innuendo which makes the statement defamatory.

Illustrations

Z makes a statement that X is an honest man and he never stole my watch. Now this statement is at first instance may be innocent, but it can be defamatory if the person to whom it was made, interprets from this that X is a dishonest man having stolen the watch.

Defamation of class of persons

When particular words spoken are referred to a group of individuals or a class of persons, then no single person of that group or class can sue unless he proves that the words could reasonably be considered to referring him.

Illustration- If a person wrote that all doctors were thieves, then no particular doctor could sue him unless there was something that pointed out that the person actually intended to defame him individually.

This situation will be different if the person wrote that all doctors of Ganga ram hospital are thieves and then doctors of Ganga ram hospital can sue him for defaming them.

Communication between husband and wife

In the eyes of law, both husband and wife are one person and the communication of a defamatory matter from the husband to the wife or vice versa is no publication and will not come within the purview of section 499. Section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 deals with privileged communications between husband and wife and makes them out of the scope of section 499 except in suits between married persons, or in a proceeding in which one married person is prosecuted for any crime committed against the other.

In a leading case of T.J. Ponnen v. M.C Verghese the court held that the letter from husband to his wife containing defamatory matter concerning the father-in-law will not amount to defamation. It will very much be covered within the scope of privileged communications between husband and wife as laid in section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872.

Defenses defamation

The defenses to an action for defamation are

Justification of truth

Fair comment

Privilege

Justification of truth

In a civil action for defamation, the truth of the defamatory matter is a complete defense and the reason for this is that “ Law will not permit a man to recover damages for something being true about him “.

Under criminal law on the other hand merely proving that the statement was true is not a good defense and besides this, the defendant has to show that it was made for public good also.

If the defendant is not able to prove the truth of the facts, the defense cannot be availed. In the case of Radheyshyam Tiwari v. Eknath court held the defendants for publishing defamatory matter against the defendants. Later the defendants were not able to prove that the facts published by him were true and, therefore he was held liable.

Fair comment

Making a fair comment on matters public interest is a valid defense to an action for defamation. For this, the following must be proved

It must be a comment i.e, an expression of opinion rather than an assertion of fact

For example, If X says that A has been guilty of breach of trust and therefore he is a dishonest man. Here the latter words are a comment on the former. But if A did not commit any breach of trust and X still says to him as a dishonest man. Then it will not be a comment and will amount to an assertion of fact.

The comment must be fair

The comment should be fair i.e. should not be based upon untrue facts.

For example, X publishes serious allegations of bribery against Y in a newspaper. Later X is not able to prove the truthness of these allegations and therefore his comment will not amount to fair comment.

The matter commented upon must be of public interest-

The matter on which the defendant has commented must be of public interest. Matters like administration of government departments, courts, ministers, public meetings, textbooks, etc are considered to be matters of public interest.

Privilege

As the word suggests itself i.e. giving special status. These special occasions when the law recognizes that the right of free speech outweighs the plaintiffs right to defamation and a defamatory statement made on such occasion is not actionable. Privileges are of two types.

1. Absolute privileges– In matters of these complete immunity is given to person speaking and no action for defamation can lie against him. It includes 3 aspects

Parliamentary proceedings– Article 105(2) of the Indian constitution gives immunity to parliamentarians to speak anything during the course of business of parliament and no action would lie against them.

Judicial proceedings– This protection has been given to judges under judicial officers protection act of 1850. It also extends to counsels, witnesses, and parties to a suit.

Qualified privilege– This privilege is also available and under this, it is necessary that the statement must have been made without a malice i.e a wrongful intention.

For example, A, a shopkeeper, says to B, who manages his business, “ Sell nothing to Z unless he pays you ready money, as I am doubtful of his honesty. Now A will fall under this exception if he has made his imputation on Z in good faith for the protection of his own interest.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the key aspects of defamation as laid in section 499 IPC, we have found that the essence of defamation lies in the injury to the reputation of a person. And for this injury, he can very much sue the defendants. Defamation is of two types libel and slander. Both are considered as criminal offenses in India. There are certain exceptions to this known as privilege.

The post What is Defamation appeared first on iPleaders.

What is Defamation published first on https://namechangers.tumblr.com/

0 notes

knockingnews-blog · 5 years

Text

'नोटबंदी इतिहास का सबसे बड़ा घोटाला, कराई जाएगी जांच'

'नोटबंदी इतिहास का सबसे बड़ा घोटाला, कराई जाएगी जांच' #sting #congress

अगर कांग्रेस पार्टी की सरकार आती है तो नोटबंदी की जांच कराई जाएगी. पार्टी ने कहा है कि ये आज़ाद भारत का सबसे बड़ा खुलासा है. पार्टी ने घोटाले के आरोपों को साबित करने के लिए एक स्टिंग ऑपरेशन का वीडिय़ो भी दिखाया जिसमें गुजरात बीजेपी का नेता एक हज़ार रुपये का पुराना नोट 600 रुपये में खरीद रहा है.

विपक्षी पार्टियों ने कहा इस ‘घोटाले’ के जरिए देश की आम जनता का पैसा लूटा गया, जो देशद्रोह है.…

View On WordPress

#arvind kejriwal on demonetization #credit card fraud #debit card fraud #DeMonetisation #demonetisation in india #DEMONETIZATION #demonetization is a fraud.#demonitization #fraud #kejriwal on demonetization #narendra modi #online fraud #online fraud case #pm modi&039;s demonetization #pnb bank fraud #protect online fraud #scams over demonetization issue #secrets behind pm modi&039;s demonetization

0 notes

popularnews · 4 years

Photo

Amarinder Singh's New Attack On Arvind Kejriwal: A Big Fraud

0 notes

theresistancenews-blog · 7 years

Text

यूपी एमपी और अब राजस्थान, आखिर खराब ईवीएम से भाजपा की ही पर्ची क्यूँ? केजरीवाल

नई दिल्ली: दिल्ली के मुख्यमंत्री और आम आदमी पार्टी के संयोजक अरविंद केजरीवाल ने एक बार फिर ईवीएम में गड़बड़ी को लेकर इलेक्शन कमीशन को सवालों के घेरे में खड़ा कर दिया है। उन्होंने कहा की क्यूँ सारी EVM से भाजपा की ही पर्चियां निकल रही हैं? EVM सच में ख़राब हैं या उसमें घोटाले किये जा रहे हैं। केजरीवाल ने चुनाव आयोग से तीखा सवाल किया है कि, क्या राजस्थान वाली EVM से ही दिल्ली में इलेक्शन कराया जाएगा?…

View On WordPress

#Arvind Kejriwal #Cow Terror #delhi mcd #EVM FRAUD #EVM Tempering. Delhi MCD #Saffaron Terror

0 notes

gkt49 · 7 years

Text

Arvind Kejriwal: Can Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallya leave India without BJP intrigue

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has questioned the Narendra Modi-driven Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in the midst of reports of tycoon goldsmith Nirav Modi, who is under Enforcement Directorate scanner over Rs 280 crore fraud at Punjab National Bank.

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has questioned the Narendra Modi-driven Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in the midst of…

View On WordPress

#Arvind Kejriwal #DELHI CM

0 notes

bharatiyamedia-blog · 5 years

Text

Harsh Vardhan writes to CMs of Delhi, Odisha, Telangana, West Bengal; urges them to hitch Ayushman Bharat scheme

http://tinyurl.com/y2tys2ml New Delhi: Union Well being Minister Harsh Vardhan has written to the chief ministers of Delhi, Odisha, Telangana and West Bengal, urging them to hitch the Centre’s flagship medical health insurance scheme, Ayushman Bharat — Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB-PMJAY), as the final word beneficiary of this collaboration would be the poor and weak individuals of the nation. Vardhan had additionally spoken to Arvind Kejriwal, Naveen Patnaik and Mamata Banerjee, the respective chief ministers of Delhi, Odisha and West Bengal, and was making an attempt to attach with Telangana chief minister Okay Chandrashekar Rao, a press release from the well being ministry stated. File picture of Union minister Harsh Vardhan. PTI Taking inventory of the scenario that the three states and one Union Territory (UT) have been but to hitch the AB-PMJAY, Vardhan, in his letter to the chief ministers, stated, “It is necessary that the advantages of a visionary scheme like Ayushman Bharat ought to attain all of the disadvantaged and weak individuals within the nation.” “I’ll make all efforts to persuade the remaining states and the UT to carry the advantages of the scheme to their individuals and be certain that no eligible particular person is disadvantaged of those advantages.” He stated it was because of the clear processes, ease of entry and advantages to a big part of the poor inhabitants that 32 states and UTs had accepted the scheme, which was working efficiently and offering monetary safety to crores of individuals. Urging the states to hitch the scheme, the minister stated they might acquire by way of sources, nationwide portability, state-of-the-art technological platforms, implementation techniques and world-class analytics techniques at no further value. They’d additionally profit from a well-proven fraud monitoring-and-control system and the trade of key learnings and greatest practices of different states in direction of equitable healthcare, he added. Vardhan made it clear that monetary sources could be made out there to the states with enough flexibility within the spirit of cooperative federalism. He additionally identified that implementing the scheme wouldn’t solely show extremely useful for the states, but additionally for the individuals and all of the stakeholders. “The final word beneficiary of this collaboration can be poor and weak individuals. As a result of portability of providers, the states will acquire from the nationwide community of hospitals and also will assist present providers in their very own states to these from outdoors their states,” the minister stated. He assured full assist and cooperation to the states in aligning their very own schemes with Ayushman Bharat. The AB-PMJAY scheme goals to supply a protection of Rs 5 lakh per household yearly, benefitting greater than 10.74 crore poor households for secondary and tertiary care hospitalisation by means of a community of empanelled healthcare suppliers. !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '259288058299626'); fbq('track', 'PageView'); (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_GB/all.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.9&appId=1117108234997285"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk')); window.fbAsyncInit = function () { FB.init({appId: '1117108234997285', version: 2.4, xfbml: true}); // *** here is my code *** if (typeof facebookInit == 'function') { facebookInit(); } }; (function () { var e = document.createElement('script'); e.src = document.location.protocol + '//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js'; e.async = true; document.getElementById('fb-root').appendChild(e); }()); function facebookInit() { console.log('Found FB: Loading comments.'); FB.XFBML.parse(); } Source link

0 notes