#IBM Red Hat couple containers for hybrid cloud deployments
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
nidhimishra5394 · 2 months ago
Text
Cloud Microservice Market Growth Driven by Demand for Scalable and Agile Application Development Platforms
The Cloud Microservice Market: Accelerating Innovation in a Modular World
Tumblr media
The global push toward digital transformation has redefined how businesses design, build, and deploy applications. Among the most impactful trends in recent years is the rapid adoption of cloud microservices a modular approach to application development that offers speed, scalability, and resilience. As enterprises strive to meet the growing demand for agility and performance, the cloud microservice market is experiencing significant momentum, reshaping the software development landscape.
What Are Cloud Microservices?
At its core, a microservice architecture breaks down a monolithic application into smaller, loosely coupled, independently deployable services. Each microservice addresses a specific business capability, such as user authentication, payment processing, or inventory management. By leveraging the cloud, these services can scale independently, be deployed across multiple geographic regions, and integrate seamlessly with various platforms.
Cloud microservices differ from traditional service-oriented architectures (SOA) by emphasizing decentralization, lightweight communication (typically via REST or gRPC), and DevOps-driven automation.
Market Growth and Dynamics
The cloud microservice market is witnessing robust growth. According to recent research, the global market size was valued at over USD 1 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) exceeding 20% through 2030. This surge is driven by several interlocking trends:
Cloud-First Strategies: As more organizations migrate workloads to public, private, and hybrid cloud environments, microservices provide a flexible architecture that aligns with distributed infrastructure.
DevOps and CI/CD Adoption: The increasing use of continuous integration and continuous deployment pipelines has made microservices more attractive. They fit naturally into agile development cycles and allow for faster iteration and delivery.
Containerization and Orchestration Tools: Technologies like Docker and Kubernetes have become instrumental in managing and scaling microservices in the cloud. These tools offer consistency across environments and automate deployment, networking, and scaling of services.
Edge Computing and IoT Integration: As edge devices proliferate, there is a growing need for lightweight, scalable services that can run closer to the user. Microservices can be deployed to edge nodes and communicate with centralized cloud services, enhancing performance and reliability.
Key Industry Players
Several technology giants and cloud providers are investing heavily in microservice architectures:
Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers a suite of tools like AWS Lambda, ECS, and App Mesh that support serverless and container-based microservices.
Microsoft Azure provides Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and Azure Functions for scalable and event-driven applications.
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) leverages Anthos and Cloud Run to help developers manage hybrid and multicloud microservice deployments.
Beyond the big three, companies like Red Hat, IBM, and VMware are also influencing the microservice ecosystem through open-source platforms and enterprise-grade orchestration tools.
Challenges and Considerations
While the benefits of cloud microservices are significant, the architecture is not without challenges:
Complexity in Management: Managing hundreds or even thousands of microservices requires robust monitoring, logging, and service discovery mechanisms.
Security Concerns: Each service represents a potential attack vector, requiring strong identity, access control, and encryption practices.
Data Consistency: Maintaining consistency and integrity across distributed systems is a persistent concern, particularly in real-time applications.
Organizations must weigh these complexities against their business needs and invest in the right tools and expertise to successfully navigate the microservice journey.
The Road Ahead
As digital experiences become more demanding and users expect seamless, responsive applications, microservices will continue to play a pivotal role in enabling scalable, fault-tolerant systems. Emerging trends such as AI-driven observability, service mesh architecture, and no-code/low-code microservice platforms are poised to further simplify and enhance the development and management process.
In conclusion, the cloud microservice market is not just a technological shift it's a foundational change in how software is conceptualized and delivered. For businesses aiming to stay competitive, embracing microservices in the cloud is no longer optional; it’s a strategic imperative.
0 notes
graciegarner16 · 5 years ago
Text
Global IT operations analytics market Rising Demand and Tremendous Business Growth
Data Bridge Market research has recently released expansive research titled “Global IT Operations Analytics Market 2019” guarantees you will remain better informed than your competition. This study provides the broader perspective of the market place with its comprehensive market insights and analysis which eases surviving and succeeding in the market. This global gives exhaustive study of new market entry, industry forecasting, future directions, opportunity identification, strategic analysis and planning, target market analysis, insights and innovation. This IT Operations Analytics Market report also provides a deep insight into the activities of key players such as IBM Corporation, Splunk Inc., SAP SE, Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP, and others. This comprehensive report gives better market perspective in terms of future events, sales strategies, Investments, business marketing strategy, future products, new geographical markets, customer actions or behaviours with the help of 100+ market data Tables, Pie Charts, Graphs & Figures spread through Pages for easy understanding.
The report also endows with the information, statistics, facts and figures which are very helpful for the companies to maximize or minimize the production of goods depending on the states of demand. It presents top to bottom examination of the market for estimating income, return on investment (ROI) and developing business strategies.
Global IT operations analytics market is set to witness a healthy CAGR of 38% in the forecast period of 2019- 2026. The report contains data of the base year 2018 and historic year 2017. Rapid generation of significant amount of data by leading multinational companies across the globe owing to the incorporation of automation processes at several stages will be a key impetus for the market growth.
Get Exclusive Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts Here@ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample?dbmr=global-it-operations-analytics-market&AM
Major Industry Competitors: IT Operations Analytics Market
Few of the major competitors currently working in the global IT operations analytics market are IBM Corporation, Splunk Inc., SAP SE, Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP,  Sumo Logic, Nexthink, VMware Inc., Prelert Inc., AppDynamics, ExtraHop Networks, BAY DYNAMICS, Microsoft, Evolven Software, TeamQuest Corporation, Hitachi Data Systems, Zenoss Inc., Apptio Inc., BMC Software Inc., and others
Thinking One Step Ahead
In today’s competitive world you need to think one step ahead to chase your competitors, our research offers reviews about key players, major collaborations, merger & acquisitions along with trending innovation and business policies to present better insights to drive the business into right direction
The 2019 Annual IT Operations Analytics Market offers:
=> 100+ charts exploring and analyzing the IT Operations Analytics market from critical angles including retail forecasts, consumer demand, production and more => 10+ profiles of top IT Operations Analytics producing states, with highlights of market conditions and retail trends => Regulatory outlook, best practices, and future considerations for manufacturers and industry players seeking to meet consumer demand => Benchmark wholesale prices, market position, plus prices for raw materials involved in IT Operations Analytics type
Key Segmentation: IT Operations Analytics Market
By Application (Real-Time Log Analytics, Application Performance Management, Infrastructure Management, Network and Security Management), Technology/Tool (Visual Analytics, Machine-Based Learning, Predictive Analytics, User Behaviour Analytics, Root-Cause Analytics), Deployment Model (On-Premises, On-Demand), Organization Size (Large enterprises, SMEs), Vertical (BFSI, Healthcare & Life Sciences, Retail & Consumer Goods, Manufacturing, Travel & Hospitality, IT & Telecommunication Media & Entertainment, Government), Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, Middle East and Africa)
Rapid Business Growth Factors
In addition, the market is growing at a fast pace and the report shows us that there are a couple of key factors behind that. The most important factor that’s helping the market grow faster than usual is the tough competition.
What are the major market growth drivers?
Increasing incorporation of cloud computing networks is enhancing the market growth
Increasing digitization is a factor for the market growth
Rapid advancements in the field of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Internet of Things (IoT) is driving the market growth
Increased amount of IT operation and its optimization is enabling the market to grow
Key Points of this Report: The depth industry chain include analysis value chain analysis, porter five forces model analysis and cost structure analysis
The report covers North America and country-wise market of IT Operations Analytics
It describes present situation, historical background and future forecast
Comprehensive data showing IT Operations Analytics capacities, production, consumption, trade statistics, and prices in the recent years are provided
The report indicates a wealth of information on IT Operations Analytics manufacturer
IT Operations Analytics market forecast for next five years, including market volumes and prices is also provided
Raw Material Supply and Downstream Consumer Information is also included
Any other user's requirements which is feasible for us
Key Developments in the Market:
In October 2018, IBM announced the acquisition of Red Hat for USD 190 per share in cash representing a total value of approximately USD 34 billion which includes all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Red Hat. The acquisition will enable several companies to securely transfer all their business applications to the cloud and will further strengthen IBM’s high value business model making it the leading hybrid cloud provider
In October 2018, Oracle acquired Data Fox which is among the leading developer of predictive intelligence as a service provider to multiple companies across the globe. It uses AI to analyse the larger business predictions. The acquisition will significantly enhance the Oracle Cloud Applications with an extensive set of data of AI derived company data level and signals. This in return, will enable the consumers to achieve much better business decisions and outcomes
Some extract from Table of Contents
Overview of Global IT Operations Analytics Market
IT Operations Analytics Size (Sales Volume) Comparison by Type
IT Operations Analytics Size (Consumption) and Market Share Comparison by Application
IT Operations Analytics Size (Value) Comparison by Region
IT Operations Analytics Sales, Revenue and Growth Rate
IT Operations Analytics Competitive Situation and Trends
Strategic proposal for estimating availability of core business segments
Players/Suppliers, Sales Area
Analyze competitors, including all important parameters of IT Operations Analytics
Global IT Operations Analytics Manufacturing Cost Analysis
The most recent innovative headway and supply chain pattern mapping
Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe, MEA or Asia Pacific.
Table Of Contents Is Available Here@ https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc?dbmr=global-it-operations-analytics-market&AM
Why Is Data Triangulation Important In Qualitative Research?
This involves data mining, analysis of the impact of data variables on the market, and primary (industry expert) validation. Apart from this, other data models include Vendor Positioning Grid, Market Time Line Analysis, Market Overview and Guide, Company Positioning Grid, Company Market Share Analysis, Standards of Measurement, Top to Bottom Analysis and Vendor Share Analysis. Triangulation is one method used while reviewing, synthesizing and interpreting field data. Data triangulation has been advocated as a methodological technique not only to enhance the validity of the research findings but also to achieve ‘completeness’ and ‘confirmation’ of data using multiple methods
About Data Bridge Market Research:
An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!
Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market. Data Bridge endeavors to provide appropriate solutions to the complex business challenges and initiates an effortless decision-making process.
Data Bridge adepts in creating satisfied clients who reckon upon our services and rely on our hard work with certitude. We are content with our glorious 99.9 % client satisfying rate.
Contact:
Data Bridge Market Research US: +1 888 387 2818 UK: +44 208 089 1725 Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475
0 notes
reneeacaseyfl · 6 years ago
Text
IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s?
IBM finalized its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat last week, one of the largest technology deals in history. A lot is on the line for IBM and for CEO Ginny, who some have said is staking her legacy on the deal. The companies themselves believe that, combined, they are “the leading hybrid cloud provider.”
The reality is that much of their software platform revenues come from traditional infrastructure business, not public cloud. IBM’s cloud business did grow in its most recent quarter, but only by 5%, which isn’t much compared to Microsoft’s 41% cloud revenue growth in its most recent quarter. And based on Red Hat’s last stand-alone quarter, its Application Development-related and other emerging technology subscription revenue accounted for a little over 24% of total revenue, with the public cloud related revenue being a subset of that number. Even with the addition of Red Hat, IBM clearly has some catching up to do when it comes to cloud.
One factor that will be critical to the success of this transition is IBM/Red Hat’s ability to win the hearts and minds of developers, who are critical decision makers in any enterprise’s journey to cloud. The rise of the developer hit tipping point more than five years ago – hand in hand with the success of cloud computing. Developers should be concerned that IBM could try to take them back in time to the pre-DevOps, pre-cloud dark ages where complicated technology and top-down selling of monolithic platforms to CxO’s reigned supreme. How and why could this happen?
Profiting from complexity
Enterprises now live in a cloud-first world that values simplicity and agility. But IBM is known for embracing complexity and monolithic platforms as a means to sell more consulting services. The services-heavy business model is key to its financial performance. Global Technology Services (which includes infrastructure and cloud services as well as technology support) is IBM’s biggest business unit. It generated $6.84 billion in revenue in its most recent quarter but came in under consensus estimate and added to Wall Street’s disappointment.
Now, with the Red Hat business, IBM has an opportunity to bring back its 1990s IT services strategy. Developers targeting cloud have happily moved on from big integrated services plays where companies like IBM prescribe monolithic full-stack platforms. They will not tolerate this sort of regression. And yet IBM will need to court them in order to fuel its cloud turnaround.
Enabling cloud choice, more or less
IBM may want to look deeper at what it just bought in Red Hat OpenShift. The OpenShift team has done a great job building an enterprise container platform that is second only to Docker’s platform. There’s lots for developers to like with OpenShift, including its ability to run on all the major clouds. But OpenShift is dependent on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) CoreOS for its Kubernetes capabilities. This tight coupling of OpenShift with Red Hat’s operating system effectively means it is competing head-to-head with the container services from Amazon (ECS/EKS), Azure (AKS), and Google (GKE) rather than enabling the rich value of OpenShift to ride atop any of these cloud container services.
Additionally, IDC has found that when it comes to developers, “88% use containers with multiple operating systems (4.1 OSs on average), and 51% of container deployers have both Windows and Linux containers.” Red Hat has positioned itself as a leader in cloud, however a majority of workloads running in the cloud are not on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system. This full stack approach from IBM (and now Red Hat) with diminished choice is a two-decade step backwards for today’s developers who are closer than ever to being able to develop and deploy modern applications anywhere they choose. Forcing OpenShift users to use Red Hat’s Linux stack is a strategy to protect revenue.
IBM/Red Hat appears to want to prescribe a monolithic stack of Red Hat products from top to bottom, all the way down to the operating system. Its leadership recently said, “This is the problem that we’re aiming to solve — providing a single, common operating environment across the hybrid and multicloud world.” But any solution that results in less choice, not more, is a regression that will leave a bad taste in the mouth of today’s developer.
Give developers what they want
IBM’s track record shows that as a platform company, it has “failed to make the transition to cloud computing … meanwhile the cloud continues to relentlessly devour IBM’s business,” as consultant Charles Fitzgerald recently put it. Just how quickly is cloud devouring its traditional on-premises market? 451 Research found that workloads targeting “on-prem traditional resources” are projected to drop from 40% today to just 19% in 2021. It also found that “workloads primarily executed in hosted/cloud environments” will grow from 36% today to 57% in 2021. This is a tectonic shift for IBM/Red Hat to navigate in their quest to be a credible cloud market contender. They will need the developer community on their side if they are to succeed.
But developers have already spoken, and they not only need but demand simplicity and choice. The success of public clouds like AWS, Azure, and GCP and the popularity of “Dockernetes” (Docker + Kubernetes) are examples of the power of developer-led adoption. A dated playbook of boxing in and trying to control developers through a Big Blue (and now Red) stack could ultimately harm IBM’s chances of achieving cloud relevancy.
Shaun Connolly is a strategist and advisor for young tech companies at AccelG2M. He has 25+ years as a software executive, business strategist, and product development professional with expertise in big data, cloud, devops, and open source. He previously held key product strategy roles at Hortonworks, SpringSource/VMware, JBoss/Red Hat, and Bluestone/HP. Follow Shaun @shaunconnolly.  
Credit: Source link
The post IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s? appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.tumblr.com/post/186427545517
0 notes
velmaemyers88 · 6 years ago
Text
IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s?
IBM finalized its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat last week, one of the largest technology deals in history. A lot is on the line for IBM and for CEO Ginny, who some have said is staking her legacy on the deal. The companies themselves believe that, combined, they are “the leading hybrid cloud provider.”
The reality is that much of their software platform revenues come from traditional infrastructure business, not public cloud. IBM’s cloud business did grow in its most recent quarter, but only by 5%, which isn’t much compared to Microsoft’s 41% cloud revenue growth in its most recent quarter. And based on Red Hat’s last stand-alone quarter, its Application Development-related and other emerging technology subscription revenue accounted for a little over 24% of total revenue, with the public cloud related revenue being a subset of that number. Even with the addition of Red Hat, IBM clearly has some catching up to do when it comes to cloud.
One factor that will be critical to the success of this transition is IBM/Red Hat’s ability to win the hearts and minds of developers, who are critical decision makers in any enterprise’s journey to cloud. The rise of the developer hit tipping point more than five years ago – hand in hand with the success of cloud computing. Developers should be concerned that IBM could try to take them back in time to the pre-DevOps, pre-cloud dark ages where complicated technology and top-down selling of monolithic platforms to CxO’s reigned supreme. How and why could this happen?
Profiting from complexity
Enterprises now live in a cloud-first world that values simplicity and agility. But IBM is known for embracing complexity and monolithic platforms as a means to sell more consulting services. The services-heavy business model is key to its financial performance. Global Technology Services (which includes infrastructure and cloud services as well as technology support) is IBM’s biggest business unit. It generated $6.84 billion in revenue in its most recent quarter but came in under consensus estimate and added to Wall Street’s disappointment.
Now, with the Red Hat business, IBM has an opportunity to bring back its 1990s IT services strategy. Developers targeting cloud have happily moved on from big integrated services plays where companies like IBM prescribe monolithic full-stack platforms. They will not tolerate this sort of regression. And yet IBM will need to court them in order to fuel its cloud turnaround.
Enabling cloud choice, more or less
IBM may want to look deeper at what it just bought in Red Hat OpenShift. The OpenShift team has done a great job building an enterprise container platform that is second only to Docker’s platform. There’s lots for developers to like with OpenShift, including its ability to run on all the major clouds. But OpenShift is dependent on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) CoreOS for its Kubernetes capabilities. This tight coupling of OpenShift with Red Hat’s operating system effectively means it is competing head-to-head with the container services from Amazon (ECS/EKS), Azure (AKS), and Google (GKE) rather than enabling the rich value of OpenShift to ride atop any of these cloud container services.
Additionally, IDC has found that when it comes to developers, “88% use containers with multiple operating systems (4.1 OSs on average), and 51% of container deployers have both Windows and Linux containers.” Red Hat has positioned itself as a leader in cloud, however a majority of workloads running in the cloud are not on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system. This full stack approach from IBM (and now Red Hat) with diminished choice is a two-decade step backwards for today’s developers who are closer than ever to being able to develop and deploy modern applications anywhere they choose. Forcing OpenShift users to use Red Hat’s Linux stack is a strategy to protect revenue.
IBM/Red Hat appears to want to prescribe a monolithic stack of Red Hat products from top to bottom, all the way down to the operating system. Its leadership recently said, “This is the problem that we’re aiming to solve — providing a single, common operating environment across the hybrid and multicloud world.” But any solution that results in less choice, not more, is a regression that will leave a bad taste in the mouth of today’s developer.
Give developers what they want
IBM’s track record shows that as a platform company, it has “failed to make the transition to cloud computing … meanwhile the cloud continues to relentlessly devour IBM’s business,” as consultant Charles Fitzgerald recently put it. Just how quickly is cloud devouring its traditional on-premises market? 451 Research found that workloads targeting “on-prem traditional resources” are projected to drop from 40% today to just 19% in 2021. It also found that “workloads primarily executed in hosted/cloud environments” will grow from 36% today to 57% in 2021. This is a tectonic shift for IBM/Red Hat to navigate in their quest to be a credible cloud market contender. They will need the developer community on their side if they are to succeed.
But developers have already spoken, and they not only need but demand simplicity and choice. The success of public clouds like AWS, Azure, and GCP and the popularity of “Dockernetes” (Docker + Kubernetes) are examples of the power of developer-led adoption. A dated playbook of boxing in and trying to control developers through a Big Blue (and now Red) stack could ultimately harm IBM’s chances of achieving cloud relevancy.
Shaun Connolly is a strategist and advisor for young tech companies at AccelG2M. He has 25+ years as a software executive, business strategist, and product development professional with expertise in big data, cloud, devops, and open source. He previously held key product strategy roles at Hortonworks, SpringSource/VMware, JBoss/Red Hat, and Bluestone/HP. Follow Shaun @shaunconnolly.  
Credit: Source link
The post IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s? appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.tumblr.com/post/186427545517
0 notes
weeklyreviewer · 6 years ago
Text
IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s?
IBM finalized its $34 billion acquisition of Red Hat last week, one of the largest technology deals in history. A lot is on the line for IBM and for CEO Ginny, who some have said is staking her legacy on the deal. The companies themselves believe that, combined, they are “the leading hybrid cloud provider.”
The reality is that much of their software platform revenues come from traditional infrastructure business, not public cloud. IBM’s cloud business did grow in its most recent quarter, but only by 5%, which isn’t much compared to Microsoft’s 41% cloud revenue growth in its most recent quarter. And based on Red Hat’s last stand-alone quarter, its Application Development-related and other emerging technology subscription revenue accounted for a little over 24% of total revenue, with the public cloud related revenue being a subset of that number. Even with the addition of Red Hat, IBM clearly has some catching up to do when it comes to cloud.
One factor that will be critical to the success of this transition is IBM/Red Hat’s ability to win the hearts and minds of developers, who are critical decision makers in any enterprise’s journey to cloud. The rise of the developer hit tipping point more than five years ago – hand in hand with the success of cloud computing. Developers should be concerned that IBM could try to take them back in time to the pre-DevOps, pre-cloud dark ages where complicated technology and top-down selling of monolithic platforms to CxO’s reigned supreme. How and why could this happen?
Profiting from complexity
Enterprises now live in a cloud-first world that values simplicity and agility. But IBM is known for embracing complexity and monolithic platforms as a means to sell more consulting services. The services-heavy business model is key to its financial performance. Global Technology Services (which includes infrastructure and cloud services as well as technology support) is IBM’s biggest business unit. It generated $6.84 billion in revenue in its most recent quarter but came in under consensus estimate and added to Wall Street’s disappointment.
Now, with the Red Hat business, IBM has an opportunity to bring back its 1990s IT services strategy. Developers targeting cloud have happily moved on from big integrated services plays where companies like IBM prescribe monolithic full-stack platforms. They will not tolerate this sort of regression. And yet IBM will need to court them in order to fuel its cloud turnaround.
Enabling cloud choice, more or less
IBM may want to look deeper at what it just bought in Red Hat OpenShift. The OpenShift team has done a great job building an enterprise container platform that is second only to Docker’s platform. There’s lots for developers to like with OpenShift, including its ability to run on all the major clouds. But OpenShift is dependent on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) CoreOS for its Kubernetes capabilities. This tight coupling of OpenShift with Red Hat’s operating system effectively means it is competing head-to-head with the container services from Amazon (ECS/EKS), Azure (AKS), and Google (GKE) rather than enabling the rich value of OpenShift to ride atop any of these cloud container services.
Additionally, IDC has found that when it comes to developers, “88% use containers with multiple operating systems (4.1 OSs on average), and 51% of container deployers have both Windows and Linux containers.” Red Hat has positioned itself as a leader in cloud, however a majority of workloads running in the cloud are not on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux operating system. This full stack approach from IBM (and now Red Hat) with diminished choice is a two-decade step backwards for today’s developers who are closer than ever to being able to develop and deploy modern applications anywhere they choose. Forcing OpenShift users to use Red Hat’s Linux stack is a strategy to protect revenue.
IBM/Red Hat appears to want to prescribe a monolithic stack of Red Hat products from top to bottom, all the way down to the operating system. Its leadership recently said, “This is the problem that we’re aiming to solve — providing a single, common operating environment across the hybrid and multicloud world.” But any solution that results in less choice, not more, is a regression that will leave a bad taste in the mouth of today’s developer.
Give developers what they want
IBM’s track record shows that as a platform company, it has “failed to make the transition to cloud computing … meanwhile the cloud continues to relentlessly devour IBM’s business,” as consultant Charles Fitzgerald recently put it. Just how quickly is cloud devouring its traditional on-premises market? 451 Research found that workloads targeting “on-prem traditional resources” are projected to drop from 40% today to just 19% in 2021. It also found that “workloads primarily executed in hosted/cloud environments” will grow from 36% today to 57% in 2021. This is a tectonic shift for IBM/Red Hat to navigate in their quest to be a credible cloud market contender. They will need the developer community on their side if they are to succeed.
But developers have already spoken, and they not only need but demand simplicity and choice. The success of public clouds like AWS, Azure, and GCP and the popularity of “Dockernetes” (Docker + Kubernetes) are examples of the power of developer-led adoption. A dated playbook of boxing in and trying to control developers through a Big Blue (and now Red) stack could ultimately harm IBM’s chances of achieving cloud relevancy.
Shaun Connolly is a strategist and advisor for young tech companies at AccelG2M. He has 25+ years as a software executive, business strategist, and product development professional with expertise in big data, cloud, devops, and open source. He previously held key product strategy roles at Hortonworks, SpringSource/VMware, JBoss/Red Hat, and Bluestone/HP. Follow Shaun @shaunconnolly.  
Credit: Source link
The post IBM-Red Hat: Should developers worry we’re headed back to the 1990s? appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.
from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ibm-red-hat-should-developers-worry-were-headed-back-to-the-1990s
0 notes
reyviewreviews · 7 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
IBM, Red Hat couple containers for hybrid cloud deployments https://www.zdnet.com/article/ibm-red-hat-couple-containers-for-hybrid-cloud-deployments/#ftag=RSSbaffb68
0 notes