aesfo

[aesfo]

One man and one man.

[aesfo]

I swear to God Tumblr treats this man's suit like F1 treats the side of a race-car, just space to advertise whatever random thing comes to mind.

Ibuprofen Gordon Freeman I made at 12:00am

[aesfo]

Love love love characters that present themselves as emotionally open social butterflies but the more you see of them the more obvious it is that they’re the most closed off fuckers in the story. Sure, they want to help you with your personal problems and messy emotions, but if you turn that shit back on them, they’ll shut down or deflect every time. Why are you sticking your nose in their business anyway? It’s not like it matters. They’re not a person, they’re just a role being played. They’re the guy who fixes things and saves people. Please ignore the man behind the mask, he’s fine. Everything’s fine.

[aesfo]

Love love love characters that present themselves as emotionally open social butterflies but the more you see of them the more obvious it is that they’re the most closed off fuckers in the story. Sure, they want to help you with your personal problems and messy emotions, but if you turn that shit back on them, they’ll shut down or deflect every time. Why are you sticking your nose in their business anyway? It’s not like it matters. They’re not a person, they’re just a role being played. They’re the guy who fixes things and saves people. Please ignore the man behind the mask, he’s fine. Everything’s fine.

[aesfo]

fuck me i guess 🥰

[aesfo]

"if we can't remove people from a space based on sex or gender, how do we make sure people in the group stay safe from assholes?" if you can have an enforceable "no men" rule in a queer space you could probably have an enforceable "no assholes" rule instead. it's pretty easy actually. it's actually easier to tell if someone is an asshole based on their actions than their gender, in my experience.

[aesfo]

I AM SOMETBING PRETENDING TO BE HUMAN i have always been something pretending to be human i have always pretended to be human i have always been more thing than person i am something pretending to be human

[aesfo]

I'm human

[aesfo]

I think I would look a lot cooler wet too 🫤

[aesfo]

huntrix <3333

[aesfo]

Just broke up with my girlfriend time to get funky to classic electronic music ig lmaooo

[aesfo]

nothing is more thrilling to me than two men NOT fucking

[aesfo]

She uhhhh she peggle on my ball-o-tron if you know what i mean

[aesfo]

I hate feeling like I need to do more yet I can't do anything, if that makes any sense

[aesfo]

There is a universe where we have an agreed upon "word form" (is there a better term for that?) of music notation, but this is not that universe. Getting everyone to agree to a common set of rules would be very difficult, getting enough people to learn how to read it to make it an effective way to communicate would be almost impossible.

Even if this did exist, it would probably be about as popular as sign language, if it could catch on at all.

I wish I could write music as text so I could just post riffs from my favourite songs

[aesfo]

Here is the article for those who would like to read it themselves, and a brief tl;dr of the whole thing

Last month (on July 17th, 2025) a federal judge ruled that millions of authors potentially could join a class action lawsuit against Anthropic.

The suit rightly claimed that the Claude chat bot, owned by Anthropic, used 7 million pirated books from shadow libraries, potentially leading to hundreds of billions in damages that they have to pay.

Now, Anthropic and industry groups are "begging" an appeals court to reverse the decision, arguing it would financially ruin the entire AI industry, and that AI is "too important to fail".

Anthropic went on to state that the potential cost they could face for illegally obtaining books to train their model on was "a tremendous amount, particularly for an emerging company." However, they are barely an "emerging company", they receive billions of dollars of investments, recently valued at 61.5 billion dollars, or as Futurism puts it "larger than the yearly revenue of the entire US publishing industry."

This case could set a precedent that AI can't steal content under the guise of "Fair use" anymore. This would slow down a lot of momentum AI has built, but more importantly would give a lot more protection to the people who own and make the content.

I recommend reading the full article if you have time, it goes even further in depth and explains more details that might be relevant or interesting to you, these are just the things i thought were most important.

Like to charge reblog to cast