botting200

[botting200]

I brought up rhetoric originally as a side note of comparison and only continued that because your comment on nazi Germany's unique antisemitism and antisemitic theories which I believe is not unique but was actually was used by Zionists towards Palestinians and Arabs (a couple examples are "Paliwood", the thought Palestinians are creating the narrative around Israel's genocide, or how Hamas is somehow running anti-Zionists protests and organizations. Also, in similarity to nazi Germany, Zionists paint Palestinians/Arabs as a major threat to the existence of their country.)

I also believe you have Israel's/Zionism's motives wrong when talking about Palestinians because their goal is to settle more land and maintain an ethnic majority or a master race (shown in the illegal settlements in occupied Palestine, its ethnic cleansing, collecting dead IDF soldiers sperm to give to their wives so they can have children(yes that is real and is eugenics), the banning of marriage between jews and non-jews in Israel and its invasion and occupation of countries on its boarders) Israel is expansionist and eugenicist like Nazi Germany.

Yes, Israel and India do share very similar rhetoric and wants and can be compared, but I would say that doesn't take away from the comparisons between Israel and nazi Germany. India is also under far different material circumstances due to being under British colonialism, and its religious supremacy, not racial supremacy (talking about India/Pakistan not the conflicts and erasure of smaller indigenous communities by India). Zionism and Nazism are both white supremacists and based on western ideals of race while India's ethnonationalism is not.

I think the method due to their material circumstances in which Israel and Nazi Germany carry out their ethnonationalism is not as big as a gap as seen due to Israel is being backed by America and Europe. Which allows it to have very similar practices to Nazi Germany. Both Israel and nazi Germany both tried ethnic displacement at first to secure ethnic majority/to remove an ethnic group (the Nakba in Israels case and the Madagascar plan for Nazi Germany) both failed (to varying degrees but the Madagascar plan failed worst due to France's colonization and occupation of Madagascar) then they both attempted apartheid and removal of rights of minorities leading to the ghettos in both nazi Germany and Israel (Gaza is the major Palestinian ghetto). Now the main difference between nazi Germany's and Israel's genocides are Israel had different political pressure, so they did not rush their genocide like nazi Germany did (due to trying to maintain American and European support and the countries in war with Israel were dealing with American destabilization).

If it's offensive to compare a Jewish guy to Hitler that particular Jewish guy should probably avoid committing a genocide. If he finds Hitler comparisons to be offensive.

[botting200]

Alt account because so fucking baffeled by this. Like you literally have less knowledge on Israel and Palestine than me.

You didnt even have a perspective sept nazism is somehow a very special magical thing that cannot be used in analysis because somehow its unique when it was literaly inspired by America's white surpremacy and settler colonialism (which you disagree with but wont actually explain how that is flimsy) and its antisemitism is unique even though russia and europe were doing literal pograms before hand and hitler gained his ideas from Henry Ford and eugenics was very common. Your also only looking at nazism relation to jews and not other minorities that were genocided by nazi germany.

Like you wanna clarify any position you made? Or you're just gonna hide behind me being younger than you.

If it's offensive to compare a Jewish guy to Hitler that particular Jewish guy should probably avoid committing a genocide. If he finds Hitler comparisons to be offensive.