Note
They also lack medical rights. Children are denied the right to seek care unless an adult chooses to provide it. They are denied the right to informed consent and the right to decision making. They are given no say and often very little information about what is happening to them in doctors offices, even during procedures known to cause lasting mental trauma.
"children are not an oppressed class" children do not even have bodily autonomy.
children are literally forced to beg adults for permission to use the bathroom, they're forced to humilate themselves just so they don't wet themselves, it's disgusting.
it's one of the many things that if an adult did to another adult, it would be seen as inhumane and potentially even sexual.
286 notes
·
View notes
Text
Me, watching my kitten hold still for a suspiciously long time: Ollie, are you peeing on my floor?
Ollie: Not
Me: Are you sure?
Ollie, grunting through time and space to push out a chocolate mcmuffin wider than he is tall: Not
70K notes
·
View notes
Text
"you don't owe anyone anything" You are a tar pit. Speak for yourself. I personally owe the cafe employees my dishes put away and my friends a listening ear and small scared insects a cup and a gentle trip outside. Hyperindividualism is a rancid infection borne of capitalism and willfully misinterpreted therapyspeak and I will defy it by continuing to be kind regardless of whether or not it benefits me personally
107K notes
·
View notes
Text
went to get bottom surgery but they did some minecraft shit to my pussy. 1 meter by 1 meter by 1 meter cube of stone down there now. i dont believe this
391 notes
·
View notes
Text
one thing about me is that I'm looking stuff up. you mentioned something and I don't know it? I am pulling out my phone and googling that shit. an actor? theoretical physics? a world leader? a vocabulary word? I am on the wikipedia page as we speak
26K notes
·
View notes
Text
So my 14 year old has an idea that he's calling the "Million Adam Smashers" argument. The reference is from Cyperpunk 2077, where there is a character, Adam Smasher, who has turned himself into a living tank, a complete cyborg in which the only thing still human is his literal brain. My son's argument is this: as a creator--a writer, game designer, manga artist, whatever--you need to ask yourself, why is this guy unique? Why are there not a million Adam Smashers? All you need is money, connections, and a specific mindset that allows you to cope with or disregard your supposed lack of "humanity", and you too can be Adam Smasher. And he's right; there should be dozens, hundreds of rich assholes who might otherwise get into racing or yachts or something but if you can become a terrifying cyborg capable of stopping a car with one hand, at least some people, out of the billions in the universe, would choose that. Why don't Arasaka and Militech just have twenty Adam Smashers apiece?
More broadly, he's making a point about fictional characters, usually main characters--is what makes them special, you know....actually special? Are they the main character because these things happened to them, or did these things happen because they're the main character? Why are they Adam Smasher, and not someone else? It's a test; a check to make sure you're not favoring the character because you're enamored with that character.
I think it's an interesting mental exercise. Take a good look at your universe and your characters and make sure that if there's only one Adam Smasher, only one Captain America, only one Rock Lee, only one Joker, there's a good reason.
#this is actually what breaks immersion for me most in fictional universes.#if i have to constantly remind myself these things are happening not because the character is the lead#but that they are the lead because these things happen#especially w regard to plot armor romance and skills#its frustrating to have the mc always be the most powerful most intelligent#most interesting#whatever#idk i just think the plot should be the most interesting thing
8K notes
·
View notes
Text
if we are going to have parking lots, they should be covered in solar panels and trees.
If we are going to have windows, we should take advantage of existing tech to make those solar panels too
If we are going to have shitty big ass streets, they should be lined with fruit producing shade trees, with accessible walking/riding paths, and public restrooms. And run with frequent, accessible, free, reliable, ecologically safe public transit.
If we are going to have skyscrapers we should integrate power generating technology like wind and solar into the existing buildings, rather than suffering the wastage and inefficiency of transport and the pollution of fossil fuel reliance.
If we are going to have cities, we need to have the means of producing fresh healthful food in reach for the people living there in the form of rooftop and backyard and vertical gardens and local farms and fisheries.
If we are going to have lumber is should be harvested responsibly and replanted with viable ecological diversity and respect for the land.
If we are going to have industrial farming it should local, ethical, and done with respect for every part of every animal.
If we are going to have highways, we must also have land bridges and other offsets to minimize harm to the local ecology.
If we are going to have trash, we should make it compostable, nontoxic, and recycle and reuse as much as we can for as long as we can.
These things are doable, the only reason they arent done is because rich people hate you and the planet.
0 notes
Text
i entirely do not give a fuck if men are getting their feelings hurt because one of them saw a lesbian or a woman with trauma say "i hate men" twice in one week or whatever. like are we for real serious. i'm going to say this in the nicest way possible : grow thicker skin & get over it.
11K notes
·
View notes
Text
every major structural social problem right now is basically "we don't have enough skilled workers on the ground" and the reason is always "well we've been intentionally underpaying and understaffng them for decades to increase corporate profits" and somehow the news always just mentions the "shortage" without digging into the cause
air travel is a mess? shortage of air traffic controllers - for some mysterious reason
logistics a mess? shortage of truck drivers - for some mysterious reason
public transit can't meet demand? shortage of bus drivers - for some mysterious reason
We even mysteriously have shortages of doctors, nurses, teachers... FOR SOME MYSTERIOUS REASON
FUCKING PAY PEOPLE AND HIRE ENOUGH STAFF
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
every major structural social problem right now is basically "we don't have enough skilled workers on the ground" and the reason is always "well we've been intentionally underpaying and understaffng them for decades to increase corporate profits" and somehow the news always just mentions the "shortage" without digging into the cause
air travel is a mess? shortage of air traffic controllers - for some mysterious reason
logistics a mess? shortage of truck drivers - for some mysterious reason
public transit can't meet demand? shortage of bus drivers - for some mysterious reason
We even mysteriously have shortages of doctors, nurses, teachers... FOR SOME MYSTERIOUS REASON
FUCKING PAY PEOPLE AND HIRE ENOUGH STAFF
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
A lot of otherwise intelligent people are scared to criticize chatGPT because they think there is an observed pattern in history where new technology is always either good or inevitable, and people who are skeptical of new technology always look like fools, and they are scared to look foolish when AI is The New Technology That Revolutionized Everything.
I am not scared of any of that nonsense. The first reason, is that chatGPT isn't a "new technology" at all, both because it is just a scaled-up version of stuff that already existed, and because "technology" implies a thing that does something useful and ChatGPT doesn't appear to do anything useful.
The second reason, is that the people frightened of looking like Luddites assume that because we are all alive, the feared bad outcomes of new technology have never happened, and that is just completely false. New technologies have sometimes had awful impacts upon human quality of life and the environment. Sometimes, unilaterally inferior technologies have replaced superior technologies for economic or other reasons. Almost always new technologies have a mix of positive and negative impacts.
In fact, I think the uncontrolled, rapid growth of generative AI and large language models is happening because of the common belief that "new technology" is always inevitable and good. This is a new technology, therefore "developing" it is inherently leading towards Something. But instead, the amount of resources and environmental and human devastation is simply accelerating and accelerating. The new technology takes everything and gives us nothing.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
affirmations
i am a complex organism brutally engineered by uncaring forces of nature
i am a product of billions of years and trillions of deaths
i am building a machine greater than myself
i am able to make phone calls and appointments
75K notes
·
View notes
Text
Deradicalization isn't just for people who got into MAGA BS.
It's for your leftist buddy who got in with a leftist group that promotes eugenics.
It's for your feminist friend who was lured into radical feminism with "divine feminine" rhetoric.
It's for you when you fall into something that you thought you were too smart for, because it never crossed your mind that fascism could be repackaged in a way that would appeal to you.
13K notes
·
View notes
Text
Captions shouldn't be censored. If the video says fuck or cum or cunt the captions should say the fucking word.
209K notes
·
View notes
Text
My "100% Australian wool" is "made in China". They shipped this stuff halfway around the world, spun it, dyed it, then shipped it back. Every time I see shit like this I'm reminded of how absurd it is that worldwide wage inequality makes this the most cost effective solution.
13K notes
·
View notes
Text
drug dependence is real, but sometimes people use this to further this idea that it means those drugs are a categorical harm in all contexts. sometimes you are already experiencing the thing that they warn would happen if you take drugs and then stop later. sometimes the worst case scenario is already your life before the drugs, and people will still try to present it like a scary consequence to avoid through abstaining from the medication that would alleviate it.
like I've had chronic insomnia for most of my life. I cannot sleep at night without drugging myself. is this great? no, it sucks. but this was the case before I got access to the drugs, too! and yes I tried everything anyone recommended about sleep, trust me.
people warned me like, "if you take those, you won't be able to sleep without them." ...I literally already could not sleep. I couldn't sleep without them before I had them. I can't sleep without them now. nothing has changed except now I have access to drugs that allow me to sleep.
at a certain point you just need to make peace with the idea that some people need drugs to survive. sorry if it makes you uncomfortable, but that's just how it goes.
2K notes
·
View notes