ridiculouslyunintelligent

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

romeo by conan gray i loved you from the first note i heard

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

it makes me yearn for better times, and the thing is, i KNOW i could just choose a different search engine but i wont??

rewatching doctor who and seeing Rose google the doctor and get actual search results instead of umpteen ads and a bullshit ai overview 😭

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

thanks kids crying

apple trend!🍎 this was my first heartbreak and i never got over it

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

I feel that Doctor Who has always done better on a tighter budget even going back to Classic Who. The audience it built WANTED that level of tackiness or cheapness about it, and I think that the BBC struggled to understand that. The average viewer of Doctor Who most definitely prefers a cheaper and less polished look in terms of both CGI and practical effects, but it’s hard to say which of the two is actually ‘cheaper’ as it really can vary based on what they actually want to do.

Pyrotechnics come fairly cheap (which is kind of shocking given the risks involved lol but it’s true) and so most of the minor explosions and the gunfire and stuff in Doctor Who is still done practically even in the latest seasons, but then for other things it can work out cheaper to do (even fairly high quality) CGI effects, and some things (regenerations, certain monsters like the version of Omega we see in The Reality War) can’t really be done practically and look even slightly acceptable in this day and age (and i mean ‘this day and age’ broadly as well, the entirety of nuwho not just the last couple of years).

It really all depends on what you want and where and when you want it.

Another thing I’ve noticed is the partial abandonment of prosthetics for aliens in the last couple of seasons, most (or more than before) of the aliens and monsters just look like people, either with minor physical differences or with no visible difference at all. It used to be something we saw all the time, think the Sontarans, the Silurians, the Zygons, etc. I’m not actually sure why, but i’d hazard a guess that they felt that approach looked dated and messy in many circumstances, but a more polished CGI approach was too expensive. I think they should stick with the prosthetics anyway, but the studios rarely see it that way.

As for Disney having much influence, to me it seems quite unlikely. It’s important to know that the crew who work on Doctor Who at the moment is largely made up of many of the same people that have worked on it since the 2005 revival (obviously people come and go, but it’s one of few programmes with a pretty consistent crew over the years). I do think that the extra money in the budget had a lot of influence in how polished it was, and I think that there’s a chance the writers may have wanted to take things in a different direction to previous series of Doctor Who since everything from the 60th anniversary onwards was considered a ‘soft reboot’, but I seriously doubt that Disney were able to pressure them into anything simply ad a result of a distribution deal. I could be wrong! But that’s how i see things

hot take: the problem with doctor who is NOT that they brought billie piper back, it is NOT that ncuti left early, it is NOT that 15 never faced a dalek or a cyberman, and it is CERTAINLY NOT that it’s ’too woke’

the problem with doctor who is that they have forgotten how to engage an audience without utterly confusing them. if i were a writer, this is what i’d change:

1. i would lower the stakes

my biggest issue with dw in recent years is that the stakes are always SO high - it’s always ‘we need to sort this out or else the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WILL END. this rarely happened at the start of nuwho. of course, there were instances where galaxies and universes were at stake, but there were also plenty of instances where the doctor solves issues to A. save his own skin, B. save his friends, and C. to save smaller populations of people and/or generally do what is morally right.

prime example is in new earth. the world isn’t really at stake, he has a couple of objectives: get cassandra to piss off, free the test subjects, stop the infections from spreading. he doesn’t spend the hour worrying that if he doesn’t help then the world will end, he sees a problem that’s morally corrupt and he solves it for the sake of that group. the payoff is just as good, and actually IMPROVES the payoff for episodes where a bit more is at stake, like the poison sky, for example.

2. i would stop plots from spilling over across seasons

i’d like to remind everyone that, although there were things that kind of linked into each other and were mentioned again, generally for the first 4 seasons of (new) doctor who, an overarching issue was built up, climaxed, and resolved throughout a single season. for example: bad wolf in s1. this has gotten worse and worse over time but has honestly been a problem since rtd1 ended, and for some reason when he came back it got WORSE than it’s ever been!!! there’s just way too much overspill across seasons, things even span accross different doctors more recently which is just too much at times. when it’s little things it doesn’t matter, but it’s not. again, this has been an issue before this finale, but this finale is a good example since there were a hundred and one loose ends before he regenerated. when nuwho began, they literally stated each regen would be treated as a soft reboot and their neglect of that has been a downfall.

3. i’d make doctor who dirty and grungy again

it’s too clean futuristic ultra modern sci-fi these days. the tardis doesn’t look like he stole it. what happened to those fun tardis scenes where the entire thing would shake as it took off and landed? why is everything so light and clean? it should be dim and cozy and imperfect.

4. i’d make the companions’ family members more prominent and interesting characters again

doesn’t take much explaining, really. picture jackie tyler, now picture carla sunday. who has a stronger presence and personality in your head and why is it jackie tyler? (there’s bound to be someone who disagrees and that’s fine but i don’t rlly want to hear about it tbh)

5. i’d re-inject some british whimsy

please don’t mistake this as me saying doctor who ‘isn’t british’ or something weird and gammon-y like that, i love when dw explores different cultures, the story and the engine was one of my highlights last season, i just mean like - let him save the world with a jammy dodger again. let him be brought back to life by a good cup of tea. it makes it enjoyable.

there are lots of things, but those are my main ones.

EDIT: thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this - i’ve found it really interesting to see everyone’s perspectives on this because honestly i could talk for king and country about it, but also i just wanted to say that it makes me kind of sad that one of my only negative posts about doctor who is my most popular post :( if you’re reading this, it’s your sign to do something positive today, if i can help to make just one person’s day better then that’s a win to me :)

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

tomorrow i’m being interviewed to potentially be on who wants to be a millionaire how do i pretend to have a personality so they let me on the show

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

there is a CLEAR difference here and i feel refreshed to not be the only one with a strong opinion about it

thank you for your service in spreading the word on the difference between a jammie dodger and a jam and cream sandwich

I love the fact that you followed me for this.

You're very welcome. All in a day's work for the Pedantic Biscuit Police.

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

THIS IS TRUE! it was NOT a jammie dodger but in fact a fox’s jam and cream, also evidenced by the size, which is somewhat smaller than a true jammie dodger. common mixup unfortunately as jammie dodgers are FAR superior to fox’s jam and cream, the addition of cream does NOT make up for the hard jam and bland biscuit

hot take: the problem with doctor who is NOT that they brought billie piper back, it is NOT that ncuti left early, it is NOT that 15 never faced a dalek or a cyberman, and it is CERTAINLY NOT that it’s ’too woke’

the problem with doctor who is that they have forgotten how to engage an audience without utterly confusing them. if i were a writer, this is what i’d change:

1. i would lower the stakes

my biggest issue with dw in recent years is that the stakes are always SO high - it’s always ‘we need to sort this out or else the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WILL END. this rarely happened at the start of nuwho. of course, there were instances where galaxies and universes were at stake, but there were also plenty of instances where the doctor solves issues to A. save his own skin, B. save his friends, and C. to save smaller populations of people and/or generally do what is morally right.

prime example is in new earth. the world isn’t really at stake, he has a couple of objectives: get cassandra to piss off, free the test subjects, stop the infections from spreading. he doesn’t spend the hour worrying that if he doesn’t help then the world will end, he sees a problem that’s morally corrupt and he solves it for the sake of that group. the payoff is just as good, and actually IMPROVES the payoff for episodes where a bit more is at stake, like the poison sky, for example.

2. i would stop plots from spilling over across seasons

i’d like to remind everyone that, although there were things that kind of linked into each other and were mentioned again, generally for the first 4 seasons of (new) doctor who, an overarching issue was built up, climaxed, and resolved throughout a single season. for example: bad wolf in s1. this has gotten worse and worse over time but has honestly been a problem since rtd1 ended, and for some reason when he came back it got WORSE than it’s ever been!!! there’s just way too much overspill across seasons, things even span accross different doctors more recently which is just too much at times. when it’s little things it doesn’t matter, but it’s not. again, this has been an issue before this finale, but this finale is a good example since there were a hundred and one loose ends before he regenerated. when nuwho began, they literally stated each regen would be treated as a soft reboot and their neglect of that has been a downfall.

3. i’d make doctor who dirty and grungy again

it’s too clean futuristic ultra modern sci-fi these days. the tardis doesn’t look like he stole it. what happened to those fun tardis scenes where the entire thing would shake as it took off and landed? why is everything so light and clean? it should be dim and cozy and imperfect.

4. i’d make the companions’ family members more prominent and interesting characters again

doesn’t take much explaining, really. picture jackie tyler, now picture carla sunday. who has a stronger presence and personality in your head and why is it jackie tyler? (there’s bound to be someone who disagrees and that’s fine but i don’t rlly want to hear about it tbh)

5. i’d re-inject some british whimsy

please don’t mistake this as me saying doctor who ‘isn’t british’ or something weird and gammon-y like that, i love when dw explores different cultures, the story and the engine was one of my highlights last season, i just mean like - let him save the world with a jammy dodger again. let him be brought back to life by a good cup of tea. it makes it enjoyable.

there are lots of things, but those are my main ones.

EDIT: thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this - i’ve found it really interesting to see everyone’s perspectives on this because honestly i could talk for king and country about it, but also i just wanted to say that it makes me kind of sad that one of my only negative posts about doctor who is my most popular post :( if you’re reading this, it’s your sign to do something positive today, if i can help to make just one person’s day better then that’s a win to me :)

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

if you’re not lightly confused by at least SOMETHING whilst watching doctor who, you’re not really experiencing it properly, and i pity them for their attempt to take that away from viewers across the pond

hot take: the problem with doctor who is NOT that they brought billie piper back, it is NOT that ncuti left early, it is NOT that 15 never faced a dalek or a cyberman, and it is CERTAINLY NOT that it’s ’too woke’

the problem with doctor who is that they have forgotten how to engage an audience without utterly confusing them. if i were a writer, this is what i’d change:

1. i would lower the stakes

my biggest issue with dw in recent years is that the stakes are always SO high - it’s always ‘we need to sort this out or else the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WILL END. this rarely happened at the start of nuwho. of course, there were instances where galaxies and universes were at stake, but there were also plenty of instances where the doctor solves issues to A. save his own skin, B. save his friends, and C. to save smaller populations of people and/or generally do what is morally right.

prime example is in new earth. the world isn’t really at stake, he has a couple of objectives: get cassandra to piss off, free the test subjects, stop the infections from spreading. he doesn’t spend the hour worrying that if he doesn’t help then the world will end, he sees a problem that’s morally corrupt and he solves it for the sake of that group. the payoff is just as good, and actually IMPROVES the payoff for episodes where a bit more is at stake, like the poison sky, for example.

2. i would stop plots from spilling over across seasons

i’d like to remind everyone that, although there were things that kind of linked into each other and were mentioned again, generally for the first 4 seasons of (new) doctor who, an overarching issue was built up, climaxed, and resolved throughout a single season. for example: bad wolf in s1. this has gotten worse and worse over time but has honestly been a problem since rtd1 ended, and for some reason when he came back it got WORSE than it’s ever been!!! there’s just way too much overspill across seasons, things even span accross different doctors more recently which is just too much at times. when it’s little things it doesn’t matter, but it’s not. again, this has been an issue before this finale, but this finale is a good example since there were a hundred and one loose ends before he regenerated. when nuwho began, they literally stated each regen would be treated as a soft reboot and their neglect of that has been a downfall.

3. i’d make doctor who dirty and grungy again

it’s too clean futuristic ultra modern sci-fi these days. the tardis doesn’t look like he stole it. what happened to those fun tardis scenes where the entire thing would shake as it took off and landed? why is everything so light and clean? it should be dim and cozy and imperfect.

4. i’d make the companions’ family members more prominent and interesting characters again

doesn’t take much explaining, really. picture jackie tyler, now picture carla sunday. who has a stronger presence and personality in your head and why is it jackie tyler? (there’s bound to be someone who disagrees and that’s fine but i don’t rlly want to hear about it tbh)

5. i’d re-inject some british whimsy

please don’t mistake this as me saying doctor who ‘isn’t british’ or something weird and gammon-y like that, i love when dw explores different cultures, the story and the engine was one of my highlights last season, i just mean like - let him save the world with a jammy dodger again. let him be brought back to life by a good cup of tea. it makes it enjoyable.

there are lots of things, but those are my main ones.

EDIT: thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this - i’ve found it really interesting to see everyone’s perspectives on this because honestly i could talk for king and country about it, but also i just wanted to say that it makes me kind of sad that one of my only negative posts about doctor who is my most popular post :( if you’re reading this, it’s your sign to do something positive today, if i can help to make just one person’s day better then that’s a win to me :)

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

How did you come to studying film?

i DID want to be an optometrist, then in 2020 i got put in detention at school for hitting a girl who bullied me (i’m not a violent person but she is so i had to fight back) where i read the book ‘Stranger Things: Worlds Turned Upside Down’ in one day, thought it was fascinating, decided i want to work in film and tv because i’ve always loved making short films at home and already loved watching films (and tv), and here i am five years later studying film!

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

yay I love to bother people with questions and statements. I'm actually the same anon as the one who sent you an "I think I love you" type ask way back and I still think that (non-creepily I promise)

not creepy at all i think i love you too - thank you for bothering me kind stranger

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

i’d LOVE to be bothered with questions and statements

bring back tumblr ask culture let me. bother you with questions and statements

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

If or not Disney want to renew the distribution contract WILL have some impact on if or how soon doctor who gets renewed for another season by the BBC because they DID contribute a lot to the funding of the episodes of Doctor Who they were ‘involved’ with (and I use the word ‘involved’ quite lightly because, again, they have little impact on the actual creative direction, no Disney employees work on the actual programme during the creative process, It’s still made totally by BBC Cymru/Wales and Bad Wolf) and it’s likely that, even if Doctor Who would go on without Disney like RTD said it would (in an interview, to paraphrase, he said DW would still go on if Disney didn’t renew their distribution deal), they’re still going to want to wait around to see what Disney want to do because it’s the financially smart thing to do if that makes sense?

I’m not really sure why they just refuse to say it like it is, but it’s not a problem that’s exclusive to DW or the BBC in general. Additionally, people are going into panic mode saying last season’s viewing figures were at an all time low, but what those people are (intentionally?) leaving out is that TV viewing figure ACROSS the board are at an all time low. There haven’t been that many times in Doctor Who’s 62 year run that it’s made it into the BARB top 10 most viewed programmes in the UK each week it airs, so it’s not alarming that it’s not doing that like it sometimes was in the Tennant days, it’s actually still hitting the top 50 each week it airs, normally getting into the top 20 or 30 which, for a programme in a very specific genre which is generally ‘past its prime’, is very good.

To put this into perspective, each episode of Doctor Who this season was pulling in 2-3.5 million viewers in the first 24h (between BBC One and streaming on iPlayer in the uk), YES in 2007 it was regularly hitting 7-10m, but so were TV programmes in general. Some of the most popular programmes on TV now like Eastenders and Emmerdale only bring in 3-5m on an average week, and DW never has and never will be as widely popular as those. The reduction in viewers is proportional to the reduction of TV viewing in general.

Doctor Who is not in any heightened danger, it’s just hit a road block because it’s being made under new circumstances and so it’s taking time for the BBC, Bad Wolf, and Disney to figure out a next step unfortunately

hot take: the problem with doctor who is NOT that they brought billie piper back, it is NOT that ncuti left early, it is NOT that 15 never faced a dalek or a cyberman, and it is CERTAINLY NOT that it’s ’too woke’

the problem with doctor who is that they have forgotten how to engage an audience without utterly confusing them. if i were a writer, this is what i’d change:

1. i would lower the stakes

my biggest issue with dw in recent years is that the stakes are always SO high - it’s always ‘we need to sort this out or else the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WILL END. this rarely happened at the start of nuwho. of course, there were instances where galaxies and universes were at stake, but there were also plenty of instances where the doctor solves issues to A. save his own skin, B. save his friends, and C. to save smaller populations of people and/or generally do what is morally right.

prime example is in new earth. the world isn’t really at stake, he has a couple of objectives: get cassandra to piss off, free the test subjects, stop the infections from spreading. he doesn’t spend the hour worrying that if he doesn’t help then the world will end, he sees a problem that’s morally corrupt and he solves it for the sake of that group. the payoff is just as good, and actually IMPROVES the payoff for episodes where a bit more is at stake, like the poison sky, for example.

2. i would stop plots from spilling over across seasons

i’d like to remind everyone that, although there were things that kind of linked into each other and were mentioned again, generally for the first 4 seasons of (new) doctor who, an overarching issue was built up, climaxed, and resolved throughout a single season. for example: bad wolf in s1. this has gotten worse and worse over time but has honestly been a problem since rtd1 ended, and for some reason when he came back it got WORSE than it’s ever been!!! there’s just way too much overspill across seasons, things even span accross different doctors more recently which is just too much at times. when it’s little things it doesn’t matter, but it’s not. again, this has been an issue before this finale, but this finale is a good example since there were a hundred and one loose ends before he regenerated. when nuwho began, they literally stated each regen would be treated as a soft reboot and their neglect of that has been a downfall.

3. i’d make doctor who dirty and grungy again

it’s too clean futuristic ultra modern sci-fi these days. the tardis doesn’t look like he stole it. what happened to those fun tardis scenes where the entire thing would shake as it took off and landed? why is everything so light and clean? it should be dim and cozy and imperfect.

4. i’d make the companions’ family members more prominent and interesting characters again

doesn’t take much explaining, really. picture jackie tyler, now picture carla sunday. who has a stronger presence and personality in your head and why is it jackie tyler? (there’s bound to be someone who disagrees and that’s fine but i don’t rlly want to hear about it tbh)

5. i’d re-inject some british whimsy

please don’t mistake this as me saying doctor who ‘isn’t british’ or something weird and gammon-y like that, i love when dw explores different cultures, the story and the engine was one of my highlights last season, i just mean like - let him save the world with a jammy dodger again. let him be brought back to life by a good cup of tea. it makes it enjoyable.

there are lots of things, but those are my main ones.

EDIT: thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this - i’ve found it really interesting to see everyone’s perspectives on this because honestly i could talk for king and country about it, but also i just wanted to say that it makes me kind of sad that one of my only negative posts about doctor who is my most popular post :( if you’re reading this, it’s your sign to do something positive today, if i can help to make just one person’s day better then that’s a win to me :)

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

i KIND OF disagree to be honest, a lot of people don’t realise that the only thing that Disney paid the BBC for was distribution rights ONLY for the soft relaunched series (so 60th specials onwards) in countries outside the uk with Disney+, that means they don’t have much if any say in the writing and content of the show, the only thing connected to the programme’s quality that is directly impacted by disney is that the money they paid the bbc for distribution rights gets added to the budget.

the reason that the older episodes aren’t on Disney+ is because, at the time of the deal, HBO already had the distribution rights for existing episodes in the USA and to allow Disney those rights would probably infringe on such a contract.

there’s also the fact that the BBC still own full merchandising rights to Doctor Who, meaning that Disney cannot license out the brand to companies/manufacturers of any kind of product, only the BBC have that authority worldwide and it’s always been that way, plus the BBC have licensing contracts with Character Options for figures and toys.

i’m not trying to be rude or argue, it’s just that i study film and tv at university and i take a big interest in distribution and licensing and all that sort of thing and i see a lot of misinformation on it, especially regarding the BBC/Disney Doctor Who contract. I think the finale had so many shortcomings, but I also think people often direct their disappointment at the wrong people or express it in ways that are less productive and end up not actually getting anyone what they want. (prime example was people being unhappy with chris chibnall and saying ‘sack him’ so they did and brought back rtd when people weren’t being clear enough as to why they didn’t like it, so rtd made all the same mistakes and worse)

i’m not right all the time so please don’t take this as me being like ‘i’m right you’re wrong’, i’m happy to like actually discuss it properly, but that’s just my understanding of things :)

hot take: the problem with doctor who is NOT that they brought billie piper back, it is NOT that ncuti left early, it is NOT that 15 never faced a dalek or a cyberman, and it is CERTAINLY NOT that it’s ’too woke’

the problem with doctor who is that they have forgotten how to engage an audience without utterly confusing them. if i were a writer, this is what i’d change:

1. i would lower the stakes

my biggest issue with dw in recent years is that the stakes are always SO high - it’s always ‘we need to sort this out or else the ENTIRE UNIVERSE WILL END. this rarely happened at the start of nuwho. of course, there were instances where galaxies and universes were at stake, but there were also plenty of instances where the doctor solves issues to A. save his own skin, B. save his friends, and C. to save smaller populations of people and/or generally do what is morally right.

prime example is in new earth. the world isn’t really at stake, he has a couple of objectives: get cassandra to piss off, free the test subjects, stop the infections from spreading. he doesn’t spend the hour worrying that if he doesn’t help then the world will end, he sees a problem that’s morally corrupt and he solves it for the sake of that group. the payoff is just as good, and actually IMPROVES the payoff for episodes where a bit more is at stake, like the poison sky, for example.

2. i would stop plots from spilling over across seasons

i’d like to remind everyone that, although there were things that kind of linked into each other and were mentioned again, generally for the first 4 seasons of (new) doctor who, an overarching issue was built up, climaxed, and resolved throughout a single season. for example: bad wolf in s1. this has gotten worse and worse over time but has honestly been a problem since rtd1 ended, and for some reason when he came back it got WORSE than it’s ever been!!! there’s just way too much overspill across seasons, things even span accross different doctors more recently which is just too much at times. when it’s little things it doesn’t matter, but it’s not. again, this has been an issue before this finale, but this finale is a good example since there were a hundred and one loose ends before he regenerated. when nuwho began, they literally stated each regen would be treated as a soft reboot and their neglect of that has been a downfall.

3. i’d make doctor who dirty and grungy again

it’s too clean futuristic ultra modern sci-fi these days. the tardis doesn’t look like he stole it. what happened to those fun tardis scenes where the entire thing would shake as it took off and landed? why is everything so light and clean? it should be dim and cozy and imperfect.

4. i’d make the companions’ family members more prominent and interesting characters again

doesn’t take much explaining, really. picture jackie tyler, now picture carla sunday. who has a stronger presence and personality in your head and why is it jackie tyler? (there’s bound to be someone who disagrees and that’s fine but i don’t rlly want to hear about it tbh)

5. i’d re-inject some british whimsy

please don’t mistake this as me saying doctor who ‘isn’t british’ or something weird and gammon-y like that, i love when dw explores different cultures, the story and the engine was one of my highlights last season, i just mean like - let him save the world with a jammy dodger again. let him be brought back to life by a good cup of tea. it makes it enjoyable.

there are lots of things, but those are my main ones.

EDIT: thank you to everyone who has weighed in on this - i’ve found it really interesting to see everyone’s perspectives on this because honestly i could talk for king and country about it, but also i just wanted to say that it makes me kind of sad that one of my only negative posts about doctor who is my most popular post :( if you’re reading this, it’s your sign to do something positive today, if i can help to make just one person’s day better then that’s a win to me :)

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

tysm for tagging me :D

i was born for this because i have a car with no bluetooth and i hate radio ads

7 albums:

1. Lover, Taylor Swift

2. Being Funny in a Foreign Language, The 1975

3. Different Class, Pulp

4. (What’s The Story) Morning Glory?, Oasis

5. The Great Escape, Blur

6. Sunset Season, Conan Gray (technically an EP, not al album but SHHH)

7. Fearless, Taylor Swift

7 songs:

1. You’re On Your Own, Kid, Taylor Swift

2. Disco 2000, Pulp

3. Milk, The 1975

4. Don’t Delete The Kisses, Wolf Alice

5. Rose-Coloured Boy, Paramore

6. Dreams, The Cranberries

7. Idle Town, Conan Gray

tags (no pressure!): @faeriesandfables @fogblitz @iimoontreesii

7 albums, 7 songs

tagged by @aeterna-auroral-avenger Thank you for this, you're sweet! 🫶🏼

7 albums rules: you just got kind of shittty old car and it doesn't have bluetooth. You can only buy 7 CDs and you can't repeat an artist. What are you getting?

Oh jeez I suck at albums as I never really listen to an artist's entire album, so I'll just skip straight to songs

7 songs rules: Pick 7 songs you would listen to on repeat. Just for fun, to write to, or for inspiration. No repeating artists. So tell me what you picking?

1. ABBA - One of us

2. Halsey - Without me

3. Purple Disco Machine, ASDIS - Beat of your heart

4. Florence + The Machine - Heavy in your arms

5. Ava Max - My head & My Heart

6. Roxette - It must have been love

7. Madonna - La Isla Bonita

no pressure tags of course: @amtrak12 @dearreaders-things @artist-person @kimchijjigaeda @bad-pirate @secondearthling @ki-arni @azeki @chapterlviii @kristinsmindinpictures @snapheart1536 @plaidjazara @nowheregal67 @unimportant-ramblings @nowibelieveintheghost and whoever feels like playing it

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

the big finish audio flight into hull (my hometown) is so comical because they spend the entire thing beefing and then they’re besties by the end (and they blow up the humber bridge which was a landmark i could see from my old bedroom window)

i am jackie critical at times but this is actually so fucking cute. she’s really like well he maybe doesn’t like me and he annoys me to pieces but that’s my son in law after all. she got him the jimjams and is holding bedside vigil. she really wants him to get better as much as rose does and it hasn’t even got anything to do with saving the world.

[ridiculouslyunintelligent]

so called free thinkers when ‘i’m the one that makes you laugh when you know you’re ‘bout to cry’ 👏👏

so called free thinkers when 1 2 3 let's go bitch