#Botox and polygraph tests

[kanemedicalaesthetic]

The Truth About Botox and Micro-Expressions | Can It Fool a Lie Detector?

Botox is widely known for its ability to smooth wrinkles and fine lines, but its impact on facial expressions goes beyond aesthetics. By relaxing specific muscles, Botox can reduce the ability to make certain expressions, including micro-expressions—those fleeting facial movements that reveal true emotions. This has led to speculation about whether Botox could be used to fool lie detectors, influence social interactions, or even make someone appear more trustworthy. But how much truth is there to these claims?

Understanding Micro-Expressions and Their Role in Communication

Micro-expressions are involuntary facial expressions that last for a fraction of a second. Unlike controlled expressions, micro-expressions occur subconsciously and can reveal hidden emotions such as fear, anger, happiness, or surprise. Psychologists and law enforcement agencies often study micro-expressions to detect deception, as they can provide insight into a person’s true feelings.

Since Botox limits muscle movement in treated areas, it may interfere with the ability to produce certain micro-expressions. This raises the question: Can Botox be used to mask emotions or even deceive a lie detector?

Botox and Its Effect on Emotional Expression

When Botox is injected into facial muscles, it temporarily blocks nerve signals that cause those muscles to contract. This means that individuals who receive Botox in areas such as the forehead or around the eyes may struggle to express emotions like surprise or concern fully.

Studies have shown that Botox affects emotional recognition—not only in how people express their emotions but also in how they interpret the emotions of others. This is known as the "facial feedback hypothesis," which suggests that the way we use our facial muscles influences how we feel and perceive emotions. If a person is unable to make a worried expression, for example, their brain may also struggle to fully process feelings of worry.

Can Botox Actually Fool a Lie Detector?

Lie detectors, or polygraph tests, measure physiological responses such as heart rate, sweating, and breathing patterns rather than facial expressions. Since Botox does not directly affect these bodily responses, it is unlikely to help someone pass a polygraph test.

However, Botox might influence deception in indirect ways:

Reduced Telltale Facial Expressions – Since Botox can limit frowning or other stress-related expressions, it might make it harder for an observer to detect nervousness or discomfort. However, experienced interrogators rely on a combination of verbal cues, body language, and physiological responses, not just facial expressions.

Blunted Emotional Responses – If Botox reduces a person’s ability to feel emotions as intensely (due to the facial feedback hypothesis), it might help someone remain calmer under pressure. This could make them appear more composed during questioning, but it would not alter the physiological signals measured by a lie detector.

Impact on Social Perception – Some research suggests that people with Botox appear more neutral or relaxed, which could influence how others perceive their honesty. A face with fewer signs of stress may seem more trustworthy, even if the person is being deceptive.

The Ethical Implications

The idea that Botox could be used to manipulate perceptions or hide emotions raises ethical concerns. While it is unlikely that Botox alone could make someone a more effective liar, it does alter natural emotional expression. This could have implications in areas such as law enforcement, job interviews, and even personal relationships.

Additionally, Botox might have unintended consequences. If a person has difficulty expressing certain emotions, it could impact their ability to connect with others. For example, a lack of expressive feedback might make conversations feel less engaging or sincere.

The Limits of Botox in Deception

Despite the speculation, Botox is not a magic tool for deception. While it can reduce visible facial expressions, it does not eliminate all forms of body language, vocal tone changes, or physiological stress responses. Professional lie detection involves analyzing multiple factors, making it unlikely that Botox alone could consistently fool a polygraph test.

Conclusion

Botox can certainly affect facial expressions and emotional perception, but it is not a foolproof method for deception. While it may make micro-expressions less noticeable, it does not alter the physiological responses that polygraph tests rely on. More research is needed to fully understand how Botox influences communication and social perception. In the end, honesty and authenticity remain far more complex than just facial movements.

[lorettalivingston6911]

'All My Relations Have Been Consensual': Russell Simmons 'Vehemently' Denies New Rape Accusations

people always ask me if I've been getting Botox

Russell Simmons is still professing his innocence in the face of numerous rape allegations.

On Tuesday we heard about two more women who had filed reports, which the NYPD has confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter they are now investigating.

Related: Russell Has Already Tried To Clear His Name With Polygraph Tests

Subsequently the music mogul has spoken up to "vehemently deny" the new accusations. He told USA Today:

"I vehemently deny all these allegations. These horrific accusations have shocked me to my core and all of my relations have been consensual. The current allegations range from the patently untrue to the frivolous and hurtful. The presumption of 'innocent until proven guilty' must not be replaced by 'Guilty by Accusation.'"

Well, if Donald Trump has taught us anything, it's that the consistent denial defense does seem to work. At least it has so far.

What do YOU think about Russell's latest statement?

[Image via FayesVision/WENN.]

you'll never know what you'll find in all of these celebrity items

from LL Celeb Fueads http://ift.tt/2D1oQfu via IFTTT

[lorettalivingston6911]

Kelly Cutrone Says Russell Simmons Tried To Rape Her As The Mogul Continues To Deny Allegations With Polygraph Tests!

people always ask me if I've been getting Botox

Another woman comes forward...

In a Page Six report published on Thursday, America's Next Top Model star Kelly Cutrone says Russell Simmons tried to rape her in 1991.

According to The Hills alum, when she was 26, she bumped into the Def Jam co-founder at a party where he invited her to his apartment. Although she declined, she agreed to go with the mogul to his friend's place.

Related: Louis C.K. Breaks His Silence: 'These Stories Are True'

However, the People's Revolution founder believes Simmons actually took her back to his apartment, where the alleged assault occurred.

Cutrone recalls:

"He pushed me into his apartment and then he threw me down on the floor and literally tried to grab… take my clothes off of me... And I started kicking him really, really hard, screaming, telling him to get the fuck off of me. And that I would have him killed if he ever fucking laid a hand on me... I actually think I told him I would call Page Six! I was a publicist! I think I told him I would call Page Six and have him murdered."

After the alleged attack, the publicist immediately left the residence.

"[Simmons] was just really shaken up and I fucking split. I remember running out the door and getting a cab and all I remember was that I got in a cab and I remember a feeling — which was so crazy — of, 'Oh my god. Somebody just tried to rape me. What do I do?' And then the energy of going to the police and pressing charges against him was overwhelming to me... Then what would happen afterward — and this would happen years afterward — I'd be at a table and Russell fucking Simmons would come up to the table and then people would be like, 'Kelly, do you know Russell?,' and I'd be like, 'Yes, I know Russell — he tried to rape me.'"

While Simmons has yet to directly address Cutrone's claims, he has responded to the numerous accusations against him by saying:

"I vehemently deny all these allegations. These horrific accusations have shocked me to my core and all of my relations have been consensual."

In addition to the New York Times and Los Angeles Times reports published on Wednesday, at least 12 women have publicly accused the music exec of sexual misconduct, with some claiming rape.

Unfortunately for Simmons, the police are now officially involved.

According to the LA Times, an unidentified NYPD spokesperson says authorities have opened an investigation against Simmons, and are in the initial stages of contacting alleged victims. At least seven accounts allegedly happened in New York.

One of the women -- Sherri Hines -- says she was contacted by officials early Thursday. In the aforementioned LA Times piece, Hines says the author raped her in his office in 1983.

Simmons' attorney, Brad Rose, says his client "fully supports and will cooperate with the police inquiry and is confident of a swift resolution."

Despite the overwhelming amount of claims against him, Russell is doing everything in his power to clear his name.

According to an image obtained by TMZ, on Wednesday, Kimora Lee Simmons' ex reportedly passed a lie detector test where, his team says, the results allegedly prove he did not assault accuser Keri Claussen Khalighi.

In 1991, Khalighi says Simmons forced her to perform oral sex on him while director Brett Ratner sat and watched.

Simmons' other attorneys, Michael Sterling and E. Carlos Tanner, say their client will continue to take polygraph tests to discredit claims made by four other women.

In case you missed it, prior to the polygraph news, Russell teased on Instagram early Thursday that he will "properly defend [himself]" against Khalighi's claims.

He says on Friday, he will focus on "the case of [another alleged victim] Jenny Lumet," who made her accusations in a guest column for The Hollywood Reporter.

[Image via Ivan Nikolov/WENN.]

you might even get Kim Kardashian's or Paris Hilton's...

from LL Celeb Fueads http://ift.tt/2AIE33J via IFTTT

[lorettalivingston6911]

Jeremy Piven Took A Lie Detector Test After Sexual Misconduct Allegations! See His Surprising Results!

people always ask me if I've been getting Botox

When Jeremy Piven was accused of groping Ariane Bellamar, he vehemently denied it.

In fact, the Entourage star even said he was willing to take a polygraph, and it seems he's finally made good on that claim.

According to The Blast, the actor sat down for the lie detector test on November 13 administered by the American Polygraph Association with Chapman Investigations.

Related: Brigitte Nielsen Slams Sexual Assault Allegations Against Sylvester Stallone

When asked questions including the following, Jeremy responded "no" to all:

"Did you ever 'grab' and/or fondle Ms. Arianne Bellamar's breasts?"

"Did you ever ‘corner' Ms. Bellamar in your trailer so that you could ‘grab' her breasts and/or buttocks?"

"Did Ms. Bellamar ever enter your trailer on the set of Entourage?"

Per his report, he "PASSED" the test.

The Blast also added Ariane has been hit with lawsuits over libel, one from her her mother-in-law and father-in-law, and another from businessman Andrew Puzder.

Additionally, Jeremy took a lie detector test in regards to the sexual assault accusations from Tiffany Bacon and Amy Meador, which he also passed.

Some of those questions were as follows:

"Have you ever 'grabbed' or fondled a woman's genitals, breasts or buttocks without their consent?"

"Have you ever performed a sexual act on a female without their consent?"

"Have you ever exposed your penis or ejaculated on or in front of a female without their consent?"

"Are all the allegations of sexual misconduct false?"

He answered "no" to them all, except the last which he answered "yes."

In response to all the allegations out in Hollywood, Jeremy shared:

"We seem to be entering dark times — allegations are being printed as facts and lives are being put in jeopardy without a hearing, due process or evidence. I hope we can give people the benefit of a doubt before we rush to judgment."

Interesting.

We should note that polygraph tests are beatable and not 100% determiners of truth-telling, hence their inadmissibility in court. But still interesting.

We'll have to see what happens next, especially if his alleged victims speak out following this news.

[Image via WENN.]

all shit of items at home is why real celebrities even some cereal killers

from LL Celeb Fueads http://ift.tt/2AY6GWi via IFTTT