#Cyber Command

[odinsblog]

Donald Trump and the Republican Party have been purchased by Russia.

👉🏿 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/03/01/trump-putin-russia-cyber-offense-cisa/

[gwydionmisha]

We have abjectly surrendered to Russia. I know most Republicans hate Democracy so much they'd rather be a Russian satellite country, because if they didn't they wouldn't have voted to Trump, and nearly all the Republican Senators are all in on exposing their bellies and pissing themselves if Putin even looks like he might rub their bellies and call them good boy, because if they didn't they wouldn't have put Pete Hegseth in charge of our military, but it still feels bizarre that Republicans didn't have even a sliver of patriotism left to prevent this.

[at-the-end-of-days]

Trump just is on his knees for Putin at this point.

Europe needs to be ready because America will be on the wrong side of history.

[ato-khsz]

Command Mission X my beloved

[ronkeyroo]

🪐 Studying my latest blorbo under the microscop..... . . ...

[saywhat-politics]

Russia has intensified cyber operations against Ukraine and NATO countries, according to previous U.S. intelligence and private sector reports.

March 2, 2025, 6:35 PM MST

By Courtney Kube and Nnamdi Egwuonwu

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered U.S. Cyber Command to halt offensive cyber operations and information operations against Russia, a U.S. official familiar with the matter said.

Hegseth gave the order to the head of the command, Air Force Gen. Tim Haugh, in late February, the official said. It is unclear clear how long the order will last.

A senior U.S. defense official declined to comment on the decision "due to operational security concerns."

“There is no greater priority to Secretary Hegseth than the safety of the Warfighter in all operations, to include the cyber domain,” the official told NBC News.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, which is housed in the Department of Homeland Security, said in a statement that its "mission is to defend against all cyber threats to U.S. Critical Infrastructure, including from Russia. There has been no change in our posture."

Representatives for U.S. Cyber Command did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Russian Embassy also did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

[fell-maverick]

Split future

Under different skies the same Sun shines.

IT'S DONE! I'm gonna find a way to scan it, I have a friend who can but I don't want them to see the finished product yet bc they're one of my players.

I wanna play with it a little in Fire Alpaca too to try a little touch up work.

(EDIT: Original pictures taken with my phone camera have been replaced with properly scanned and touched up versions)

[justinspoliticalcorner]

Olivia Troye at Olivia Of Troye Unfiltered:

While Trump's tariffs hammer the economy and dominate the headlines, rightfully capturing attention as Americans watch their 401ks drop, something perilous quietly unfolded in the shadows. A significant shift in the national security apparatus occurred that barely made a blip.  It hardly registered in the mainstream news cycle late last week when General Timothy Haugh was ignominiously removed as dual-hatted Director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and Commander of U.S. Cyber Command. Perhaps in the chaos of Trump 2.0, another outstanding leader being ousted is just business as usual. For the ones that did mention it, they pointed out that the action could seriously hurt America’s cyber defenses and make it a lot easier for foreign adversaries to strike our networks. They’re correct. But let me be even clearer about what’s not being talked about: this is not just another reshuffling of power—it's a five-alarm fire for anyone who values their privacy and civil liberties.  And it wasn't just Haugh who was shown the door. Wendy Noble, the highly respected civilian Deputy Director of the NSA, was also reassigned back to the Department of Defense. This wasn't just a firing but a purge of institutional memory, experience, and moral backbone.  Tim Haugh wasn't just any flag officer. He was beloved by his workforce, respected by national security professionals across the political spectrum, and known as much for his integrity and superb leadership skills as for his mission expertise. Haugh's departure leaves a void in one of the most sensitive and consequential roles in government. Whoever fills that vacuum could alter the trajectory of one of our most fundamental American freedoms: the right to privacy.

A Role That Holds Enormous Power

By long-standing tradition, the NSA is led by a uniformed military officer, while the deputy is a civilian. That balance matters. It provides both continuity and civilian oversight of a powerful institution with the ability to monitor global communications—and, yes, potentially, American citizens. Tim Haugh upheld that legacy of integrity. Similarly, with her deep expertise and decades of experience, Wendy Noble brought the kind of institutional knowledge and civilian leadership that protected that balance. But now, with both Haugh and Noble removed in quick succession, we're in uncharted territory. The critical safeguards that these respected leaders maintained have been dismantled, and the Trump administration has shown us what it's capable of when unchecked power meets authoritarian instinct. [...]

Why You Should Care: FISA Section 702

One of the most potent surveillance tools in the national security toolbox is Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Section 702 allows the NSA and FBI to collect foreign intelligence by targeting non-U.S. persons outside the country. Sounds reasonable on paper. It's a powerful and necessary tool to protect national security—used to thwart terrorists, identify foreign cyber actors, and uncover threats to U.S. interests. But here's the catch: in the course of collecting this foreign data, U.S. persons' communications are often swept up. That's where the controversy begins. This is where procedures, leadership, and the integrity of institutions matter. As a former commander of multiple Air Force and joint intelligence organizations responsible for signals collection, Tim Haugh knew how to protect Americans’ privacy. Yet while 702 is designed to protect us, it can also be exploited to monitor Americans on U.S. soil. Without proper safeguards, it can become a backdoor to domestic surveillance. I've seen the inner workings of this system, and I can tell you that it works when principled leaders are at the helm. But in the wrong hands? It's terrifying.

Remember Trump's Obsession with Wiretaps? Let me remind you of a key moment in Trump's first term. He falsely accused President Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower. It was a baseless claim, thoroughly debunked—even his own Justice Department and the intelligence community found nothing. But Trump's tactic wasn't random. It was a classic projection. Because behind the scenes, while I was working in the White House, very real and deeply disturbing conversations were happening. Trump wanted the Department of Justice to authorize surveillance of personal devices of people he deemed political enemies or leakers. It wasn't paranoia; it was authoritarian yearning. And it was chilling. So when I see Tim Haugh forced out, Wendy Noble removed, Pam Bondi at the helm of the Department of Justice, and Kash Patel—who is currently the Director of the FBI—calling the shots, that's not just concerning. That's a massive, flashing red warning light for the nation. [...]

This Is Bigger Than One Leader

This isn't just about Tim Haugh or Wendy Noble. It's about a pattern of purging competent, principled leaders and replacing them with loyalists who will enthusiastically comply with any order or request, no matter how anathema to our democracy. It's about dismantling the apolitical fabric of our national security institutions. It's about the slow, quiet erosion of freedoms that most Americans assume are protected until they’re not.

The firing of Tim Haugh and the reassigning of Wendy Noble is a major red flag alert for national security.

[thehighcommandersignas]

X is intrigued with Signas and Sirena and fully supports their relationship but maybe a little too much because he's curious about any physical intimacy and just nonchalantly asks questions as if he were a jolly scientist - all with a warm smile

[fallout-new-mudkip]

Something I noticed last night

The King's dog is chewing on blue shoes. Just like the song, Blue Suede Shoes? Yeah?

[m00nb04rd5]

Hello, first off, love the moodboards. They’re amazing. And secondly, I do hate to be a bother and add onto your list, but could you please make a moodboard for XL from Buzz Lightyear of Star Command?

XL (Buzz Lightyear of Star Command)

[dizzy-hat]

🅱️oodle 🅱️ump

[moonwitchcartridgee]

back with some megaman X command mission posting!!! ヽ(͡◕ ͜ʖ ͡◕)ﾉ

[starrylemon]

This doodle board was supposed to be centered around command mission but I guess Cyber elf took over-

[loislane-ana]

NEWS, ukraine, zelenskyy, IPHONE 16E, economy, nyc, states, washington, cyber crime, nvidia, roof collapse, books, drones, arts financing, ice, polls, tariffs, wall street, visas, sally ride, tiktok, commander in chief, secret service protection, forever, voice of america, nyc, snl