#Government Policies and Tech

[tejkohli25]

How UK’s Tax Policies Impact the Tech Industry

Tax policies play a significant role in shaping the UK’s tech industry, influencing everything from startup funding to corporate investments. Entrepreneurs like Tej Kohli recognize the importance of adapting to changing tax regulations. His insights into Tej Kohli’s perspective on UK tax reforms and tech growth highlight how taxation policies can drive or hinder innovation.

The Effect of Tax Policies on the Tech Sector

Taxation can either stimulate tech-driven entrepreneurship or slow industry growth. Key areas impacted include:

Corporate Tax Rates – Higher taxes may discourage foreign investments and business expansions.

R&D Tax Credits – Incentives for research and innovation fuel technological advancements.

Startup Funding & Venture Capital – Tax relief programs encourage early-stage investments.

Digital Services Tax (DST) – Affects multinational tech companies operating in the UK.

Recent Changes in UK Tax Policy

Increase in Corporation Tax – In April 2023, the UK’s corporation tax increased to 25%, impacting tech firms’ profit margins.

Expansion of R&D Tax Relief – New policies encourage startups to invest in technological research.

Stricter Digital Tax Regulations – The UK government continues to refine DST, targeting large tech enterprises.

How Tax Policies Influence Tech Investments

1. Encouraging Startups through Tax Relief

Incentives such as the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) provide tax breaks for investors backing tech startups.

2. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Tech Growth

According to a 2024 UK Business Report, FDI in the UK’s tech industry declined by 12% due to rising tax burdens, leading companies to seek alternative markets.

3. The Role of R&D Tax Incentives

Many tech firms benefit from tax credits supporting research and development, reinforcing the UK’s position as a hub for innovation.

Tej Kohli’s Take on UK Taxation and Tech Expansion

Tej Kohli, a firm believer in technology-driven economic growth, highlights that favorable tax policies attract global investors and boost innovation. He advocates for a balanced taxation system that promotes both government revenue and business sustainability.

Future of UK Tax Policies in Tech

AI & Automation Tax Considerations – Potential tax reforms targeting AI-based businesses.

Increased Support for Startups – Government-backed funding for emerging tech firms.

Revisions in Digital Services Tax – Expected adjustments for multinational corporations.

Conclusion

The UK’s tax policies significantly impact the tech industry, shaping investment decisions and innovation. Tej Kohli’s insights on taxation and economic policies underscore the need for a tax structure that fosters growth. By staying informed and leveraging tax incentives, businesses can strategically navigate policy changes and drive long-term success.

[political-us]

https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/trump-revokes-biden-executive-order-addressing-ai-risks-2025-01-21/

The use of AI to recreate someone's likeness in videos and audio, often referred to as "deepfakes," is a complex legal area. While there are existing laws against impersonation and unauthorized use of an individual's likeness, the rapid advancement of AI technologies has outpaced specific legislation addressing deepfakes. The rescission of Biden's executive order may lead to fewer federal regulations specifically targeting AI-generated content, potentially creating a legal gray area regarding the use of someone's likeness without consent.

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the U.S. Congress

Stop Elon Musk from stealing our personal information!

6,399 so far! Help us get to 10,000 signers!

I am writing to urge you to stop Elon Musk from stealing our personal information.

It appears Musk has hacked into millions of Americans’ personal information and now has access to their taxes, Social Security, student debt and financial aid filings. Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency was not created by Congress—it is operating with zero transparency and in clear violation of federal law.

This violation of our privacy is causing American families across the country to fear for our privacy, safety and dignity. If this goes unchecked, Musk could steal our private data to help in making cuts to vital government programs that our families depend on—and to make it easier to cut taxes for himself and other billionaires.

We must have guardrails to stop this unlawful invasion of privacy.

Congress and the Trump administration must stop Elon Musk from stealing Americans' tax and other private data.

▶ Created on February 10 by Jess Craven · 6,398 signers in the past 7 days

📱 Text SIGN PUTWGR to 50409

🤯 Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

[audreythompson1]

Why was the world’s richest man

@elonmusk not invited to Labour’s UK investment summit?

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the President & U.S. Congress

The DATA Act and the RESTRICT Act are un-American

518 so far! Help us get to 1,000 signers!

I'm alarmed by the Ban TikTok discussion & the RESTRICT Act. We're a democratic country with a First Amendment that guarantees free expression. How does banning a social media platform abide by that principle? Especially since the US government condemns authoritarian governments in other parts of the world for blocking US-based social networks. Examples:

When Nigeria banned Twitter for seven months in June 2021, the U.S. condemned it, reiterating its support for "the fundamental human right of free expression & access to information as a pillar of democracy."

Individuals responsible for the blocking of social media applications in Iran were condemned as "engaging in censorship activities that prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Iran."

When American digital platforms have been banned or severely restricted by governments--including the Chinese Communist Party, Pakistan, & Uganda--seeking to silence & obstruct the open flow of communication & information, the US calls these entities out for it. So why are we doing the same?

TikTok is a red herring. The DATA Act & the RESTRICT Act are very broad & could lead to other apps or communications services with connections to foreign countries being banned in the US. The stated intention is to target apps/services that pose a threat to national security; the way it's currently written raises serious human & civil rights concerns that should be far more important to you.

Caitlin Vogus says: "Any bill that would allow the US government to ban an online service that facilitates Americans' speech raises serious First Amendment concerns…" And those concerns will impact marginalized & oppressed people & groups more.

The "reasoning" behind Ban TikTok is not sound. The racist fearmongering around China is bad enough. Worse is the core of the argument -- data being collected & shared & used against people -- is a problem with ALL social media. Why isn't Congress focusing on that? The apps on your phone (Facebook, Messenger, Instagram, Twitter) are constantly monitoring you & sending information about you to data brokers. Info that can be easily tied to you as an individual despite claims that all the data is "anonymized".

Congress should be addressing the larger problem & not one social network. Restricting what data they can collect about users & forbidding them from selling that data will address the issue with TikTok, too.

I urge you to kill the DATA Act & the RESTRICT Act. They need to be tossed out & more measured legislation proposed in their place that addresses the foundational problems of social media apps & services & the data they collect & who they share it with & how they & other entities use that data.

I know that's not as easy or sexy as Ban TikTok! It does address our Constitutional right to assemble & free expression. That's far more important than knee-jerk reactions & bandwagon jumping.

▶ Created on March 31, 2023 by K T

Text SIGN PNSIMC to 50409

[iyemarathichiyenagari1971]

महाराष्ट्र कृषि-कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता महाॲग्री-एआय धोरणास मंत्रिमंडळ बैठकीत मंजुरी

महाॲग्री-एआय (MahaAgri-AI) धोरण २०२५-२०२९ मंजूर  मुंबई – राज्याच्या कृषि क्षेत्राला डिजिटल युगात अग्रेसर ठेवणाऱ्या “महाराष्ट्र कृषि-कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता महाॲग्री-एआय (MahaAgri-AI) धोरण २०२५-२०२९” या धोरणास मंगळवारी ( ता. १७ ) मंत्रिमंडळाच्या बैठकीत मंजुरी देण्यात आली.   बैठकीच्या अध्यक्षस्थानी मुख्यमंत्री देवेंद्र फडणवीस होते.             कृत्रिम बुद्धिमत्ता (AI), निर्मितीक्षम कृत्रिम…

[vague-humanoid]

At the California Institute of the Arts, it all started with a videoconference between the registrar’s office and a nonprofit.

One of the nonprofit’s representatives had enabled an AI note-taking tool from Read AI. At the end of the meeting, it emailed a summary to all attendees, said Allan Chen, the institute’s chief technology officer. They could have a copy of the notes, if they wanted — they just needed to create their own account.

Next thing Chen knew, Read AI’s bot had popped up inabout a dozen of his meetings over a one-week span. It was in one-on-one check-ins. Project meetings. “Everything.”

The spread “was very aggressive,” recalled Chen, who also serves as vice president for institute technology. And it “took us by surprise.”

The scenariounderscores a growing challenge for colleges: Tech adoption and experimentation among students, faculty, and staff — especially as it pertains to AI — are outpacing institutions’ governance of these technologies and may even violate their data-privacy and security policies.

That has been the case with note-taking tools from companies including Read AI, Otter.ai, and Fireflies.ai.They can integrate with platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teamsto provide live transcriptions, meeting summaries, audio and video recordings, and other services.

Higher-ed interest in these products isn’t surprising.For those bogged down with virtual rendezvouses, a tool that can ingest long, winding conversations and spit outkey takeaways and action items is alluring. These services can also aid people with disabilities, including those who are deaf.

But the tools can quickly propagate unchecked across a university. They can auto-join any virtual meetings on a user’s calendar — even if that person is not in attendance. And that’s a concern, administrators say, if it means third-party productsthat an institution hasn’t reviewedmay be capturing and analyzing personal information, proprietary material, or confidential communications.

“What keeps me up at night is the ability for individual users to do things that are very powerful, but they don’t realize what they’re doing,” Chen said. “You may not realize you’re opening a can of worms.“

The Chronicle documented both individual and universitywide instances of this trend. At Tidewater Community College, in Virginia, Heather Brown, an instructional designer, unwittingly gave Otter.ai’s tool access to her calendar, and it joined a Faculty Senate meeting she didn’t end up attending. “One of our [associate vice presidents] reached out to inform me,” she wrote in a message. “I was mortified!”

[themorningnewsinformer]

China's 2025 AI Regulations: Global Tech Innovation Impact

Introduction: China’s Strategic Move in AI Governance In 2025, China has introduced comprehensive AI regulations that are poised to influence global technology innovation. These measures aim to establish robust governance frameworks for artificial intelligence, focusing on data security, ethical standards, and international competitiveness. Key Components of China’s AI Regulations China’s…

[fatfemmefreaquency]

not that i wanted this job done more effectively (or at all) but ohh look…more evidence that there are some jobs that humans do much better than computers—a well informed human wouldn’t have made these errors

it’s almost like your government needs to employ human experts and not a bunch of 21 year olds armed with disinformation generators

Given that Trump imposed tariffs on several uninhabited islands and oceanic territories, I think they had an intern look up the Wikipedia list of countries and make a spreadsheet.

[rightnewshindi]

हिमाचल के सरकारी स्कूलों में बड़ा बदलाव: 2026-27 से छठी कक्षा में शुरू होगी कंप्यूटर की पढ़ाई! पूरी खबर पढ़ने के लिए लिंक पर क्लिक करें। #News #BreakingNews #LatestNews #CurrentNews #HindiNews

[tejkohli25]

Why Policy Decisions Matter for Tech Growth

Tech innovation thrives in environments where government policies support research, investment, and infrastructure development. However, regulatory decisions can either accelerate or hinder technological advancements, influencing everything from startup funding to data security laws. Understanding how policy changes shape the tech industry is crucial for entrepreneurs, investors, and industry leaders.

For expert insights on how government policies impact tech growth, check out this article.

How Government Policies Influence Tech Growth

1. Funding & Investment Incentives

Government-backed grants, subsidies, and tax relief programs support startups and tech innovation.

Policies such as R&D tax credits encourage businesses to invest in cutting-edge research.

Nations with pro-business regulations attract foreign tech investment, strengthening economic growth.

2. Regulation of Emerging Technologies

AI, blockchain, and quantum computing require clear regulatory frameworks to ensure ethical deployment.

Data privacy laws like GDPR impact how tech companies collect and use consumer information.

Balancing regulation and innovation ensures technological growth without compromising security.

3. Digital Infrastructure & Connectivity

Policies that promote 5G expansion, broadband access, and cloud computing drive digital transformation.

Investments in smart cities and IoT infrastructure create new business opportunities.

Government-led tech initiatives fuel public-private partnerships for large-scale innovation.

Challenges Posed by Policy Decisions

1. Overregulation & Innovation Slowdown

Excessive regulations can create barriers to entry for startups, limiting competition and innovation.

Strict compliance requirements increase operational costs for tech businesses.

2. Uncertain Policy Environments

Frequent changes in tax structures and regulatory policies make long-term business planning difficult.

Post-Brexit trade uncertainties impact UK-based tech firms operating in global markets.

3. Talent Shortages & Immigration Policies

Restrictive visa policies limit access to skilled AI, cybersecurity, and software development talent.

Governments must address education and workforce training gaps to support industry growth.

Opportunities for Growth Through Policy Innovation

1. Strengthening Public-Private Collaboration

Governments can foster innovation by partnering with tech firms, universities, and research institutions.

Encouraging corporate investment in AI, fintech, and biotech sectors can drive economic expansion.

2. Tax Reforms to Support Startups

Lowering corporate tax rates and increasing R&D incentives can help early-stage tech firms scale.

Encouraging venture capital investment in emerging tech sectors will spur entrepreneurship.

3. Ethical AI & Data Security Regulations

Well-structured AI governance frameworks can prevent misuse while allowing AI innovation to flourish.

Governments must balance data security laws with business needs to encourage responsible tech growth.

Tej Kohli’s Perspective on Tech Policy & Growth

Tech investor Tej Kohli has emphasized that government policies must support, not hinder, innovation. His insights include:

Pro-business tax structures attract foreign investment in AI and deep tech.

Regulatory clarity is essential to ensure that startups can scale globally.

Public-sector initiatives in education and talent development are crucial for tech-driven economies.

Conclusion

Tech growth depends on forward-thinking policies that balance innovation, regulation, and investment incentives. Policymakers, industry leaders, and entrepreneurs must work together to create an ecosystem that fosters technological advancement while ensuring economic sustainability.

[senitent-flesh-computer]

ngl I'm calling it if ai and automation will automate most jobs in like 10-20 years like tech bro's and gal's believe you're going to have like at least 50 different politicians multiple countries will be advocating for human worker minimums and industrialists will try to make that be that it will be the worst and least qualified jobs where making a robot do it is marginally cheaper like amazon warehouse workers and like having to weld certain parts and when they won't be able to fill the workplaces they will start trying to make exceptions and try to decrease minimum wages since then it will according to them increase G.D.P and stimulate spending and or exports like I'm 100% calling it this will diffidently happen in at least 1 country and will be proposed in a lot more probably at least 20-40

[thewordenreport]

The tech industrial complex was unusually visible at the inauguration, sitting between Cabinet secretary-nominees and Trump's business family. Dorothy: Pay no attention to the men mingling behind the curtain. https://thewordenreport-governmentandmarkets.blogspot.com/2025/01/the-tech-industrial-complex-plus.html

[tmarshconnors]

Australia’s Social Media Ban for Under-16s

Parents, Take Responsibility

In a move sparking global debate, Australia has approved a social media ban for users under the age of 16. The legislation requires platforms to verify users' ages and obtain parental consent for minors to access their services. On paper, this might sound like a commendable step toward protecting young minds from the dangers of the digital world. But let's face it—this is yet another instance of government overreach into parental responsibilities. 

Let me be blunt: it’s not the government’s job, nor that of internet regulators, to parent your children. That’s your job. You chose to have kids; you should be responsible for their upbringing, online or offline. 

The Crux of the Problem 

Social media can be a dangerous playground, filled with predators, cyberbullying, and inappropriate content. But banning under-16s entirely or relying on the government to enforce parenting standards misses the point. The issue isn’t that kids have access to social media; it’s that too many parents fail to educate their children about responsible use. 

When did we, as a society, decide it was acceptable to outsource parenting to regulators and algorithms? When did we start expecting governments to do the hard work of teaching our kids about values, boundaries, and discernment? 

The Case Against Government Babysitting 

Handing over this responsibility to the state or tech companies is lazy and shortsighted. Governments already have their hands full with pressing issues—do we really want them playing Big Brother over our children’s TikTok accounts? And tech companies, for all their promises of "safety measures," are fundamentally profit-driven entities. They’re not moral guardians; they’re businesses. 

Beyond that, enforcement is a logistical nightmare. Age verification systems are easily bypassed, and tech-savvy kids will always find ways to skirt the rules. What we’re left with is a feel-good policy that’s more about political optics than practical outcomes. 

Parents: Step Up 

Here’s the hard truth: if you’re worried about your child’s social media use, it’s up to you to do something about it. 

- Monitor their online activity. Install parental controls, but don’t stop there. Talk to your kids about what they’re doing online and why certain behaviors are harmful. 

- Set boundaries. Teach them when it’s appropriate to be online and when to unplug. Encourage real-world interactions and hobbies. 

- Lead by example. If you’re glued to your phone, don’t be surprised when your child follows suit. Show them what healthy tech use looks like. 

This isn’t about being a helicopter parent; it’s about being present and engaged in your child’s life. 

Freedom vs. Safety 

The internet is a tool, not a boogeyman. It can be used for incredible learning opportunities, creative expression, and social connections. By outright banning under-16s from social media, we risk fostering a culture of fear rather than empowerment. 

Instead of shielding kids from the world, let’s equip them with the skills to navigate it responsibly. That starts at home—not in Parliament or Silicon Valley. 

Closing Thoughts 

Australia’s move to ban under-16s from social media might come from a place of good intentions, but it sets a troubling precedent. It absolves parents of their responsibilities and gives governments more power over individual freedoms. 

Parents, stop relying on governments to do your job. You brought your children into the world; you’re the ones responsible for raising them into well-rounded, discerning individuals. The internet isn’t going anywhere, and it’s up to you—not Canberra or tech executives—to teach your kids how to use it wisely. 

Own your role. Don’t outsource it. 

[alyfoxxxen]

Where Brendan Carr, Trump's FCC Chair Nomination, Stands on Big Tech - Business Insider