#I think I'll neglect to tag every option because that's a lot to tag...

[shootfromthehipobsessed]

I voted for 'Jimmy confronting Don Ciccicio (Tom) TSP' since I have a soft spot for 'Toby's Secret Pocket' and it's so memorable!

Plus Jimmy is an iconic character in every way and I loved him!

Thank you to the anonymous contributor for the suggestion!

EDIT: I forgot to add Luke as Little Krampus/Snowdrop!!! Sorry!

If ‘Other’ please REPLY, don’t reblog and hide your answer in the tags! You can also put “+1” under an existing reply.

[lealdog]

18 and 48 for Tag, 8 and 12 and 31 or 33 for Xavier, please?

Tag

18. What are their thoughts on thinbloods?

He still feels a deep kinship with them. They were his family. It was other Thinbloods who had his back through the ups and downs. They were all stuck in the same bullshit, scraping by at the bottom for other vampires to abuse.

It's a bittersweet thing, becoming a full-fledged vampire. And he feels a sense of loss over it. He's lost his Alchemy skills, too. It's weird. And he feels alone. Almost his entire ragtag group of Thinbloods died in the heist where he diablerized a Malkavian.

48. Detail things about your OC you spent a lot of time on!

Honestly, I think the core idea for him came to me in one day and that's where most of it came together. I would say the most time I've spent on despairing over what clan I wanted him to be. I wanted to make him a Thinblood but every time I try I get seduced by other options. And the set up with him being a former Thinblood within the Camarilla who freshly diablerized a Malkavian and now has to reckon with not only the consequences but also the change was pretty juicy.

Xavier

8. Was their sire with them after their embrace?

For a little bit. I'll take this together with the next question.

12. What happened that lead up to their embrace?

Xavier was a Zantosa Revenant, quite old, too at this point. He was sick and tired of just being a Revenant and not an actual vampire. But no one wanted to embrace him despite him trying so hard to seduce... anyone, really. Well, any Tzimisce, he didn't want to be any other clan.

So he took it upon himself and unearthed blackmail on some local Sabbat Bishop (she was a Bahari). Then cooked up some grand scheme where in the event of his death, he'd take her down with him and it just... wasn't worth the hassle so she embraced him.

She stayed with him the first couple of nights. Not because she really wanted to but because she didn't want him to go on a murder spree. Despite being so knowledge and cocky about the whole thing, Xavier's first few nights were a mess and he probably would have ended up dead within 24 hours without her.

31. Do they have a ghoul?

No though he's tried in the past...

33. Would they like to have a ghoul if they don’t have one?

He likes having ghouls to do shit for him he doesn't want to deal with but he's terrible at keeping up with them. At maintaining the bond etc etc. He's that guy who wants a pet but then neglects them and puts them out on the street because they're too much effort.

[hometownhorrors]

Someday I am going to look back on this post and mark it as a pretty major accomplishment. Let's see, disclosures up front. I have a lot of trauma, I often can't talk about stuff that has happened, especially if I feel I am "taking up space". It's like the dialogue options are grayed out.

It happened in childhood, got worse during a long bad relationship. I couldn't even explain my needs or wants, leading to just - not. I slaved away for other people, did nothing for myself, and burnt out on self neglect. There's a lot more to this, and I'll put it down on paper and share it as I go, but the important part for this project, is that I keep carrying it through.

I'm going to start creating art and work under my own identity today, instead of always using others to present it to the world. No more ghost writing, no more distancing my queer, trans, intersex, masc identity from my work, because more visible queer people is good.

I've tagged this with a few project names, and I am just gonna hold myself to weekly progress on all these little things I never worked on.. Including Hometown, which the blog was named after - a podcast about my old haunted home, which every queer person has.

I don't care if I get ANY listeners or viewers or attention at this point, I am unlikely to read TOO many comments, to avoid psyching myself out.

I'm autistic, I've got ADHD, I live knowing my expression difficulties may be more difficult than I think, as I go on through this-

But it was Chuck Tingle who made me think about it, his bag - well, this is my version of a bag, and a ski mask.

I had a tumblr, and it was associated with my OTHER WORK, which I do find *somewhat* dysphoric, to present very feminine and to do highly gendered creative work where there's constant reminders, kinda wasn't super healthy.

Burnt out, broke down, survived, and now I am going to get a youtube, and a twitch, and stream video games, and make silly video essays, and talk about being queer, and hunted, and from the worst place, and the darkest one too.

I am posting this, literally from hiding from my own family. Fortunately the people hunting me know nothing about me.

And they are hunting a girl. :P

ETA: And what I've learned from being allowed to exist as myself at last on the internet - at last - is that there are a lot more people who have been through things similar to me, than I thought. And I'd love if someone else thought that as I write some essays on hinterland capitalism, exploited populations (like the one I come from), and unhappiness within families. I'll try to warn for things, and I guess it's time to get some banners - and art- and colors. I am a BIT scared of being recognized, but I'm working on how - like, I don't owe anyone an extensive disclosure of all my creative work.

Hard to reinforce that.

[ill-be-istj-if-no-one-else-is]

Peace! It's nice to meet you, fellow mbti person! I'm so glad to have stumbled upon an ISTJ who is into typology! I have a request. I typed Elsa from Frozen in a post (I'll tag you) and I argued that she is not an ISTJ. I wanted to know what you thought, particularly if I made any mistakes in understanding the ISTJ personality type. Thank you so much in advance! I hope it's not too much of a bother. I'm an INTP btw.

Hi,

I want to start out with the following: for anyone reading, do not make a habit of having me analyze your posts about fictional characters. I am happy to help you type yourself, or answer questions about MBTI. However, in case it was not clear from the fact that I have only typed fictional characters in response to direct questions, that my answers have typically been very brief, and that I’ve repeatedly directed people to blogs that specifically focus on character typing, I’m not really interested. I should note: I had fun because I love picking up my metaphorical red pen and writing “wrong” over every other sentence, but it did also take me like an hour and a half and it’s over 3 pages long, and I don’t have time to do that regularly.

With all that said, the post had sufficient issues with both basic logical argument structure (I would very strongly recommend you revisit that INTP typing of yourself and look at something with high Fe instead) as well as understanding of MBTI that, because you asked directly, I will go through said issues. I want to make it very clear: this is going to be harsh. For both that and for the length I’m putting it below a read-more such that if you were looking for a brief thumbs up or down and not for extensive criticism, you are welcome to ignore it, block me, or whatever is best for you.

Basic argument structure: you open repeatedly with the most subjective arguments - that she gives off Fi and Ni vibes and you don’t see the Si in her. This will convince no one but yourself.

This argument is also mostly focused on “other people think this, but I don’t” which I find is only useful in a process of elimination argument. We’ll get to the final typing eventually but it is generally stronger to argue in favor of what you believe and then address potential disagreement rather than the reverse; by the time you get to ISFP I’ve read so many incorrect assumptions and subjective asides that I’ve long since stopped valuing the analysis of the work.

Issues with the ISTJ argument

(note: I have, and continue to type Elsa as an ISTJ so this will be the longest section in that I’m both pointing out flaws and arguing in favor of ISTJ; the rest will be solely focused on MBTI misconceptions or logical fallacy).

While it’s true people often mistake trauma for Si, this argument seems to equate trauma with being stuck in the past (people can just be stuck in the past without trauma for whatever other reason - it’s not healthy but it does not necessarily indicate literal trauma). There is also a false opposition here: It’s absolutely valid to argue that Elsa is traumatized, but that does not preclude her having Si, merely removes one argument in favor of Si.

You define Si (gathering concrete details to understand what to expect) but don’t actually argue why Elsa doesn’t do this. I’d argue, in opposition to the statement later in this paragraph, that she does. She is aware from the past that her abilities can harm her sister. She is aware from her past that when she avoided Anna, Anna was safe. She hasn’t been happy with the “conceal don’t feel” line, but it has achieved her goals and her expectation is that she’ll hurt someone if she stops following it.

If you’re referring to an Si-Fi loop (wallowing in self-pity), it doesn’t use Te since that’s how loops work. You don’t explicitly say this is in the context of looping although you introduce looping in the second sentence, but if you are referring to a loop this is incorrect. It’s true that ISTJs are often likely to use Si (preference for familiar/existing structures) and an Fi understanding of morality to direct their energies when they wish to change something (ie, they will change things through existing channels) but the focus on speaking out about injustice here is much more in line with enneagram 1 - a very common enneatype for ISTJs and an enneatype that’s rare for any non-TJ types, but not the enneatype I’d give Elsa nor an inherent ISTJ trait itself.

The part about self-discipline is mixed - a lot of ISTJs are very disciplined in certain areas (particularly professional/familial) but can neglect the self (not getting enough exercise/not eating well, not addressing burnout or more emotional issues) and I’d argue again, Elsa shows this: she’s not addressing the fact that she’s lonely and miserable, but she’s highly disciplined with regards to concealing her abilities and avoiding Anna even though it’s the very thing making her lonely and miserable.

I don’t necessarily think Let It Go is indicative of an Ne grip, but one can make changes outside of a grip, so this isn’t a useful argument, as it argues why an Ne grip is wrong, not why ISTJ is wrong - I would merely argue she’s not gripping at that time. Which is a general issue here: the argument you provide in this paragraph isn’t arguing against ISTJ, it’s arguing against other people’s arguments for ISTJ, which is an important distinction.

The final paragraph of the ISTJ section has numerous issues: ISTJs are not rebellious. They are not as resistant to change as stereotypes indicate, but even a healthier version of ISTJ Elsa would be unlikely to rebel and rather try to understand her parents’ argument, research other options, or look for a way to gain control over her powers while still working within the normal hierarchy. I addressed self-discipline (I should add: I don’t think a child/young woman having difficulty controlling magical powers with no training is an argument against self-discipline; my argument for self-discipline is that she stays in her room and away from her sister despite clearly hating it). It is also, to be blunt, mind-boggling that you (correctly) argue that trauma responses are not inherently Si but then refer to obsessive-compulsive behaviors as Si when that’s also a medical disorder completely divorced from the MBTI framework. Finally, her continuing to follow an order from her parents after they die is first, quite literally the definition of self-discipline (she’s the queen; no one else is going to discipline her for it, after all) and second, entirely in line with Si (this is what she has always done and it’s not great but it works) and is, arguably, if not medically obsessive-compulsive, an obsessive need to follow a compulsion. To be clear: this isn’t healthy ISTJ behavior, but since you’ve acknowledged grips and loops here I think an unhealthy interpretation of the type is very much on the table. You say her behavior is more in line with F types; it’s not and you don’t explain why.

If I may it seems as though, much in line with the argument here being against other arguments but ultimately not debunking the typing, your arguments against MBTI stereotypes focus on what’s incorrect but they tend to merely swing the pendulum to the opposite side (eg, that ISTJs are likely to rebel, in opposition to the stereotype that they’d mindlessly follow orders) rather than find the more nuanced middle ground of how people of a type or with a certain function behave.

Issues with the INFJ and INFP sections:

Ne users can and frequently do go out into the world; simply because Ne can be engaged without external physical stimulation doesn’t mean it never is. I’m also not really a fan of reading being classified as a strictly introverted pursuit; that’s falling into a pretty significant stereotype trap. Going out and exploring is a thing anyone can do but if anything I’d either associate that more strongly with high sensing (either Si or Se) or with extroversion. 

My biggest issue here is the implication that searching for a meaning for existence or a purpose is in itself an indicator of Ni. This is just the human condition. If you’re going to argue that Si users are driven to rebel against injustice I don’t see how you can miss that that might in turn be driven by a belief that this is their purpose. Perhaps Si-Ne users aren’t as invested in having a single purpose, but wondering why you are on this earth and what it is you are here to do is just being a person, and to be blunter than I have been, I am struggling to understand how there has been so much effort made earlier to push away from stereotypes to the point of overcompensation in the opposite direction and then when it comes to the idea that only Ni users have a desire for meaning in life you just accept it without question.

Issues with the ISFP section:

At this point I’ve probably covered most of them though I’d like to point out that I don’t think there was an argument ever made explicitly for introversion; while the structure of the earlier arguments and focus on debunking was, as stated, flawed, I would at least round it out by eliminating ESFP as an option.

The argument here rests heavily on Let it Go, which is interesting because most of the terrible arguments for Elsa being an intuitive also rested squarely on that same brief if admittedly pivotal section of a full movie; in attempting to differentiate itself from those arguments it has in fact replicated the most significant flaws. Anyway, I’ve addressed that I don’t personally think Let it Go being indicative of a grip is how I’d argue for ISTJ, so that becomes invalid; I’ve tried to focus more on issues with logic MBTI than the contents of the movie but I’d add that “she was happy” is open to interpretation and her emotional state was probably fairly complicated. Relieved, sure, but she’s still ultimately isolated. (Also while mentally singing Let it Go, I realized that here’s that rebellion you were asking for in the ISTJ section).

You also outright say that when Elsa tries to reassert control it’s through Te. Yeah. That’s what a high Te user does. An ISTJ in a grip would indeed use Ne, but in quite literally any other circumstance (looping or just existing as an ISTJ not in a grip or loop) would reassert control via Te, so again, your argument does not sufficiently eliminate that Elsa is an ISTJ, just that she’s not a gripping ISTJ, which I’d agree with. 

“She acts out when she is stressed and makes bad decisions” is also the human condition (and why I’ve frequently on my blog argued very strongly against typing via stress behaviors, because in the end most people...act out and make bad decisions when stressed), so this isn’t useful as an argument for anything.

In conclusion: multiple misconceptions about Ni and Si; no argument that I could find presented for high Fi, just Fi in general; inconsistency regarding whether or not Elsa rebels, and an overall reliance not on making a new argument but on arguing why other arguments were wrong. Given the title of the post you asked me to analyze I have to (admittedly this is extremely cynical of me) wonder if there was an underlying goal to come up with a typing that was different from commonly accepted arguments, rather than to simply type for its own sake.