#RandomDynamicResources

[paulnnanwobu]

How Political Polling Informs Governance and Policy-Making

By Paul Nnanwobu, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd (Nigeria & Canada)

Let’s be honest—whenever the word "poll" is mentioned in political conversations across Africa, reactions range from skepticism to outright dismissal. People either question its accuracy or view it as a political stunt. But here’s the thing: when polling is done right, ethically and transparently, it becomes more than just a number on a chart. It becomes a bridge between people and power.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, operating across Nigeria, Canada, and over 35 African countries, we’ve seen firsthand how well-structured political polling can support—not distort—democracy. And I’m not just talking about pre-election predictions. I’m talking about polling as a tool for shaping governance after the ballots have been counted.

Let’s unpack that.

At its core, political polling is about listening. It’s a structured way to ask: “What do people actually think?” Not what the media says they think. Not what a few loud voices on social media claim. But what the broader population—across class, gender, geography—truly feels about leadership, policy, and direction.

Governments that ignore this kind of input are essentially flying blind.

Imagine crafting a national health insurance policy without polling to understand which regions trust public healthcare. Or building an education reform plan without asking parents what they value most in schools. It’s possible, yes—but likely to fail in implementation or acceptance.

Polling provides a feedback loop. One that goes both ways.

For elected leaders, it offers a way to assess whether their priorities align with those of their constituents. For civil society, it provides hard data to advocate for reform. And for voters, it signals that their voices—even beyond election day—can still shape the national agenda.

Of course, not all polling is equal.

One challenge we constantly face is mistrust. In some countries, people are wary of sharing their political opinions, fearing backlash or manipulation. That’s why building respondent confidence is key. We ensure anonymity, train our field staff in neutrality, and communicate clearly how the data will be used.

And we don’t just poll during election season. Our long-term studies track public sentiment over time—on governance, corruption, service delivery, civic freedoms. This helps governments detect issues before they escalate into crises.

Take a recent example: in one West African country, our polling detected early signs of dissatisfaction with electricity pricing reforms. Government agencies were initially surprised. But once they dug into the findings, they adjusted their messaging and rolled out compensatory subsidies. The backlash never came. Not because of luck—but because of insight.

It’s this kind of proactive governance that polling can support. Not just managing perceptions—but managing reality with public input.

And here’s another overlooked benefit: policy innovation. Good polling doesn’t just say what people don’t like. It reveals gaps, needs, aspirations. The kinds of insights that inspire new ideas—local agricultural support programs, youth entrepreneurship schemes, digital service expansions. All drawn from listening, not guessing.

But for all this to work, polling must stay independent. It must be insulated from political pressure, financial manipulation, and media bias. That’s why we invest in rigorous methodology, transparent sampling, and clear reporting protocols.

And when the results are tough? We still publish them. Because credibility matters more than comfort.

It’s this commitment that earned Random Dynamic Resources Ltd a nomination for the 2025 Go Global Awards, hosted by the International Trade Council this November in London. For us, it’s a chance to show how African research isn’t just catching up—it’s setting standards. Our political polling work has informed debates in parliaments, shaped NGO strategies, and helped donors adjust their funding portfolios.

So yes, polling informs governance. But more than that—it empowers it.

Because when leaders listen, they lead better. When citizens are heard, they stay engaged. And when data becomes dialogue, democracy works.

That, to me, is the real promise of political polling.

[paulnnanwobu]

The Future of AI-Enhanced Market Research in Africa

By Paul Nnanwobu, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd (Nigeria & Canada)

AI. It’s the buzzword everyone is tossing around right now—from startup founders in Nairobi to boardrooms in Lagos to field researchers in Accra. And yes, a lot of the hype is warranted. Artificial Intelligence is transforming the way we gather, process, and understand information. But in the context of market research in Africa, the question isn’t just how fast AI is coming. It’s how well we’re going to use it.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, with operations across Nigeria, Canada, and 35+ African countries, we’ve been exploring that future carefully—not jumping on every trend, but asking real questions about what AI can actually do for insight generation in the African context. Because the reality here is different. The stakes are different. And the data? Well, that can be both incredibly rich and frustratingly fragmented.

Let’s start with what AI gets right.

One of the most immediate benefits we’ve seen is in data processing. What used to take weeks—transcribing interviews, coding responses, running thematic analysis—can now be streamlined with natural language processing tools. Imagine analyzing thousands of open-ended survey responses in multiple languages, and having the system identify tone, frequency, and sentiment, all in a few hours. That’s not the future. That’s already here.

There’s also the benefit of scale. AI-powered mobile surveys can reach remote or previously hard-to-engage populations via automated chatbots or voice assistants. This opens up access, especially in places where traditional data collection is costly or logistically complex. A good example: we recently piloted an AI-integrated WhatsApp survey for consumer habits in urban Tanzania. The completion rate? Over 85%, and with deeper qualitative follow-ups than we expected.

But let me be cautious here—because while AI can scale, it doesn’t replace cultural intelligence. A chatbot might ask the right question, but if it doesn't understand how to ask it—with the right tone, the right timing—it risks alienating the very audience you’re trying to learn from.

This is especially important in Africa, where nuance matters. Dialects, social norms, humor, hesitations—these can’t always be captured by machine logic. That’s where hybrid models come in. We use AI to sort and surface patterns, but then bring in human researchers to interpret and contextualize them.

Because insight isn’t just about data. It’s about meaning.

Another area we’re watching closely is predictive modeling. AI can spot consumer trends before they hit the mainstream—by analyzing social chatter, purchasing data, even regional economic signals. This could be transformative for businesses that want to get ahead of the curve. But again, the key word is could. Models are only as good as the data behind them. And in many parts of Africa, data infrastructure is still catching up. Spotty connectivity. Disjointed sources. Underreporting. These are real barriers.

That’s why we believe AI should enhance—not replace—the fundamentals. Strong fieldwork. Culturally grounded design. Ethics. Consent. Human oversight. It sounds old-school, but without these anchors, AI risks becoming a shiny tool chasing shadows.

Now, let me touch on something important—trust. There’s a growing concern among respondents about privacy, especially when surveys start to feel more like surveillance. If we’re going to use AI in market research responsibly, we have to be transparent. Who’s collecting the data? Why? How will it be used? These questions aren’t afterthoughts. They’re central to sustainable research practice.

And speaking of trust—this year, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd has been nominated for the 2025 Go Global Awards, hosted by the International Trade Council in London this November. It’s not just a pat on the back—it’s a platform. A gathering of the most innovative minds in international business, coming together to share, challenge, and co-create. For us, it’s a chance to speak about how African insights are evolving—and how AI can be part of that evolution without losing the human story.

So, what does the future look like?

It’s not bots taking over the work. It’s smarter workflows. Augmented analysis. Faster feedback loops. But still rooted in empathy. Still guided by people who understand that a consumer isn’t just a data point—they’re a person with context, contradiction, and choice.

If we get this balance right—if we combine AI’s speed with local wisdom, ethics, and depth—we won’t just be doing better research. We’ll be doing research that actually matters.

[paulnnanwobu]

Gender Dynamics in Consumer Decision-Making Across Sub-Saharan Africa

By Paul Nnanwobu, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd (Nigeria & Canada)

It’s easy to look at a household and assume the person holding the money is the one making the decisions. But in Sub-Saharan Africa, the truth is often more layered—more nuanced. Purchasing power is shaped not just by income, but by influence. And when we zoom in on who holds that influence, gender dynamics come clearly into focus.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, operating across Nigeria and Canada, and working in dozens of African markets, we’ve seen just how critical it is to consider gender when studying consumer behavior. Not as a footnote, not as a demographic filter—but as a lens through which decisions are negotiated, reshaped, and sometimes resisted entirely.

Here’s what I mean.

In many West African households, it’s common for men to handle bulk purchases—rice, fuel, rent. It signals control. Yet it’s often women who make the daily purchasing decisions—what to cook, what soap to buy, what snacks the children will take to school. These aren’t small choices. They add up. And in many categories, especially fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), women are the primary gatekeepers.

But influence doesn’t always align with visibility.

Take rural Kenya, for example. In a study we supported last year, men were listed as the formal “owners” of mobile phones in 68% of households. But when researchers conducted observational interviews, they found that women often used the phones more frequently—for mobile payments, health tips, even shopping advice. The phones might be registered to men, but women were driving much of the digital engagement.

So, what does this mean for brands? For policymakers? For researchers?

It means that if we don’t design our surveys and insights-gathering tools with gender sensitivity, we risk missing the full picture. Or worse, we build products and campaigns based on faulty assumptions.

We once worked with a client launching a new fertilizer product. Their initial assumption was that male farmers would be the primary adopters. But our qualitative research in Ghana’s Northern Region told a different story. While men owned the land, women managed the actual planting and crop rotation. They weren’t just labor—they were knowledge holders. So we advised including women in the marketing strategy and training rollouts. Adoption rates improved.

That project reminded us that gender roles are both visible and invisible. They're shaped by tradition, religion, economics, and—importantly—aspiration. People don’t always behave according to stereotypes. A young urban woman in Lagos will think about money and identity differently than her grandmother in the village. Same goes for men. Masculinity, too, shifts across contexts.

This is where research gets really interesting. Because when we ask people not just what they buy but why—we hear the real stories. A mother choosing powdered milk over fresh because of refrigeration issues. A father buying a cheaper brand of noodles because his son likes the taste better. A teenage girl influencing her uncle’s decision on what mobile network to switch to. These aren’t just gendered decisions. They’re emotional ones, shaped by relationships and roles.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, we take pride in uncovering these layers. It’s part of the reason, I believe, why we’ve been nominated for the 2025 Go Global Awards, hosted by the International Trade Council this November in London. And while recognition is always appreciated, what excites us more is the platform it provides—to connect with peers around the world, to explore how business and research can intersect with culture in ways that truly matter.

Because in Sub-Saharan Africa, the marketplace isn’t just about products. It’s about people—how they live, how they love, how they make choices in the quiet corners of their lives.

And gender? Gender is right there in the middle of it all. Not as a binary, not as a quota, but as a living, shifting influence that shapes how economies work from the ground up.

So the next time someone asks who’s really making the decisions, maybe the answer is: it depends. And maybe, just maybe, that’s where the insight begins.

[paulnnanwobu]

For Clients: Preparing Briefs That Enable Rich Insights

By Paul Nnanwobu, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd

We often say good research begins with a good question. But in truth, it starts even earlier—with a clear, thoughtful brief.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, operating across Nigeria and Canada, we've reviewed hundreds of client briefs over the years—some sharp and focused, others more… let’s say exploratory. And while there’s no such thing as a perfect brief, some small shifts in how clients frame their needs can make the difference between shallow results and rich, decision-ready insights.

Here’s the thing. Researchers aren’t mind readers. We don’t magically extract meaning from vague goals. But with the right foundation, we can uncover patterns, nuance, even surprises that reshape strategy. That starts with alignment.

So, for those who are planning to commission research—whether on customer behavior, policy attitudes, market testing, or social impact—here are a few simple, real-world tips for preparing briefs that lead to deeper, more useful results.

1. Be Clear About What You Actually Want to Learn Seems obvious, right? But many briefs start with long descriptions of the business or organization, followed by a laundry list of potential objectives. The result? A cloud of ambition but no core question. Try this instead: boil it down to 2–3 questions you must have answers to by the end of the study. If everything else dropped away, what would still matter?

For example, saying “we want to understand youth engagement with our brand” is broad. But “we want to know what influences trust among first-time youth users of our mobile platform in Lagos and Nairobi” gives researchers a direction—and a lens.

2. Context Is Gold One of the most useful things clients can do is share background context—even the messy parts. Failed pilots. Market shifts. Office debates. This doesn't make you look disorganized; it gives us texture. And sometimes, what you think is the research problem isn’t actually the issue—it’s a symptom.

We once had a client in the agricultural sector who wanted to test a new digital service. But after reviewing their brief and digging deeper, we realized the real barrier wasn’t the tech. It was local skepticism, tied to past programs that had overpromised. Without that context, we might have asked the wrong questions entirely.

3. Define the Audience, Then Question It Clients will often specify “we want to talk to women aged 18–45 in rural areas.” That’s a start. But we’ll ask—why that group? Is it based on sales data, assumptions, policy mandates? Sometimes narrowing the audience makes sense. Other times, it excludes voices that could surface new angles.

Also, think about representation. Are there groups you’ve overlooked because they’re hard to reach or don’t respond to surveys easily? Including them might cost a bit more—but could lead to insights that pay off long-term.

4. Be Honest About Constraints Budget. Timeline. Internal politics. Share them. We’re not here to judge—we’re here to work within reality. If you need findings in six weeks for a board meeting, say so. If there are topics you can’t touch due to sensitivities, flag them. Surprises don’t help anyone at the eleventh hour.

5. Leave Room for the Unexpected Some of the best findings aren’t answers to direct questions—they're revelations that emerge when people feel free to speak. So while structure is essential, rigidity can kill insight. In your brief, allow space for exploration, especially during qualitative phases. You might discover an issue you didn’t even know existed.

6. Think Beyond the Report What will you do with the data? If the goal is to inform a campaign, we may recommend testing messaging along the way. If it’s to guide a product, we may propose rapid feedback loops. If the findings are meant for stakeholders or funders, we might suggest visual storytelling formats.

Research doesn’t end with a report. It begins there.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, we’re constantly working with our clients—across continents and sectors—to build research that matters. And I’d like to quietly mention here, with some pride, that we’re nominated for the 2025 Go Global Awards, hosted by the International Trade Council this November in London. This event isn’t just a celebration—it’s a convergence of business minds from around the world, looking to solve real challenges with real tools. Being part of that space validates the very things we’ve been committed to—depth, partnership, adaptability.

Because ultimately, good research isn’t a transaction. It’s a collaboration. And it begins—not with fieldwork—but with the brief.

[paulnnanwobu]

ESG-Focused Research Matters for African Agriculture

By Paul Nnanwobu, Random Dynamic Resources Ltd (Nigeria & Canada)

Let’s be honest—when people hear "ESG," their minds often drift to large corporations, environmental protests, or boardroom presentations filled with acronyms. But ESG—Environmental, Social, and Governance—isn’t some distant framework meant only for Fortune 500 companies. It matters here, too. In the farms. In the fields. In the communities where agriculture is not just an industry, but a way of life.

Across Africa, agriculture feeds families, supports livelihoods, and anchors entire economies. And yet, it’s also deeply vulnerable—to climate shifts, to political decisions, to land degradation, and sometimes to the very policies designed to help it. That’s where ESG-focused research comes in. Not as an abstract trend, but as a real tool to understand what’s happening and guide what comes next.

At Random Dynamic Resources Ltd, working across Nigeria and Canada, we’ve seen firsthand how ESG principles can illuminate the hidden dynamics in agricultural systems. But to be clear—this isn’t about collecting data for the sake of checking boxes. It’s about connecting the dots between impact and action.

Take the “E” in ESG—environmental. Droughts, erratic rainfall, soil depletion... these aren’t future problems. They’re here. Farmers are feeling them today. But which regions are hardest hit? What coping strategies are emerging? How do traditional practices adapt—or not—to changing conditions? You won’t find those answers in satellite maps alone. You find them by listening. By asking the right questions. By making space for voices that are often overlooked.

For instance, in Northern Nigeria, we conducted qualitative research with smallholder farmers who had shifted their planting cycles to respond to unpredictable rains. What we uncovered wasn’t just data—it was insight. These farmers weren’t just reacting; they were innovating. But without understanding why they were changing their habits, external aid programs risked offering irrelevant support. The ESG lens helped us—and our partners—see the bigger picture.

Then there’s the “S”—social. This part is often treated as a side note, but I think, perhaps, it's the core. Who has access to land? Who doesn’t? How are decisions made within farming households? How do gender roles affect the uptake of sustainable practices?

In one East African study, we found that even when climate-smart tools were made available, they weren’t always adopted—because women, who handled much of the field labor, weren’t part of the initial training sessions. A simple oversight, maybe. But one with real consequences. ESG-focused research helped surface those gaps.

And yes, the “G”—governance. This one can feel abstract, I know. But governance isn’t just about laws or institutions. It’s about trust. Do farmers believe extension workers are competent? Are cooperatives transparent? Do input suppliers honor pricing agreements? These aren’t footnotes—they shape how agriculture functions at the ground level.

I should mention here—because it matters—that Random Dynamic Resources Ltd has been nominated for the 2025 Go Global Awards, set to take place in London this November. It's more than recognition. It’s an invitation to engage with others who care deeply about transformation—not just growth. The event, hosted by the International Trade Council, is less about applause and more about exchange. It brings together businesses, researchers, innovators—all looking for smarter ways to respond to a world in motion. And we’re proud to be in that room.

Coming back to African agriculture: we often talk about resilience. It’s become a buzzword, sure, but there's truth in it. Farmers across the continent face shifting rains, volatile markets, and aging infrastructure, yet they continue to produce, adapt, and persist.

But resilience doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It needs support. It needs informed policy. And that policy, that support—it needs to be built on evidence. Real evidence. Not assumptions. Not outdated templates. ESG-focused research helps provide that foundation. It brings clarity to complexity.

Is it easy? No. Sometimes the data conflicts. Sometimes people don’t want to talk. Sometimes what we uncover isn’t what we—or our clients—expected. But that’s okay. Honest research isn’t about tidy answers. It’s about grappling with reality. Even when it’s messy.

If we truly want African agriculture to thrive—not just survive—we need to ask better questions. We need to see beyond yield numbers. We need to understand ecosystems, communities, governance, and behavior. ESG helps us do that.

And yes, it’s still evolving. There are gaps in frameworks, debates over definitions, methodological hiccups. But that’s part of the work. We keep refining. Because the future of agriculture in Africa isn’t just a matter of productivity. It’s a matter of sustainability, equity, and shared growth.