#Waqf corruption

[kesarijournal]

Waqf Properties: A Blatant Betrayal of the Quran, Islam, and India

Case Against Waqf Properties in India 1. Waqf as Anti-Quranic Violation of Quranic Inheritance Laws: The Quran explicitly outlines inheritance laws in Surah An-Nisa (Chapter 4), which mandate the division of a deceased person’s estate among their heirs, including children, spouses, and other relatives. Waqf, by its very nature, contradicts these provisions. Waqf properties are often “locked” or…

[kailash-se-birha]

Just saw this on twitter:

Its somewhat of an old news but still very relevant.

An excerpt from, Gold monetisation: An ingenious way of looting temple jewels by the DMK government by The Organiser:

"Gold ornaments offered by the devotees to nine major temples, including Palani Dhandayuthapani Swamy temple, Meenakshi Sundareswarar temple in Madurai, Subrahmanya Swamy temple in Tiruchendur and and Mariamman temple in Samayapuram, were converted into gold bars. The department has deposited gold bars weighing over 497 kg so far.

The temple properties, both movable and immovable, antique jewellery, and rare and invaluable idols, have been the targets of politicians, the international idol smuggling mafia and some corrupt HR and CE officials. Lakhs of acres of temple lands are being grabbed, alienated, and given to other religious people. Idols are being stolen and smuggled for a hefty sum. Rare and antique value ancient temple jewellery was reportedly replaced with duplicate ones. There is a strong cry to retrieve the temples from the government control and leave it to function independently like the Waqf board and Christian churches. But both the DMK and AIADMK are not in favour of it for reasons better known to them."

Hindus can't even control their temples which served as the central institutions of culture providing food, education, medical facilities, promoted cultural art forms, etc. And the same temples are being looted by these political crooks and cronies, but sure hindus are the "oppressors", ps: I despise this oppressor/oppressed dichotomy. Meanwhile this country has a supra judicial organisations, or board, usurping land left right and centre from literally everyone for the benefit of one religious community. And finally, now the government is attempting to do something about it, we have the leaders of that community making calls for street violence, international lunatic preacher intervening in Indian politics and the leader of a literal Islamic Republic comparing India to a nation rife with civil war and an active war zone. A true Banana Republic to its core.

[hersparklinggqalb]

اِنّا لِلّهِ وَاِنّا اِلَيْهِ رَاجِعُون

Corruption in waqf is the reason why we as a community failed to talk about it strongly & win against these kuffars!

The poor hardly got benefitted from waqf boards, if we had started talking about corruption in waqf within the community & had taken severe actions the day would have never arrived. But we had been quite on many corrupt practices within the community just because it involves the members of the community.

That is why it is said, it is not easy to break into a fort without a traitor. This is just like Triple talaq law which was misused by some muslims who were actually opportunists & not muslims.

Muslims do not know their religion well, due to which they push the whole community under the trap of such hypocritical politicans.

[hindulivesmatter]

"modi is using it to appease votebanks" bitch when hasn't religion or basically anything was ever used to appease votebanks?

The unconstitutional, Waqf Act? Lol.

“give me vote I'll get ₹1000 to every woman's account” - AAP, Punjab

“give us vote we'll ban cow slaughter” - congress. Then proceeded to copy Jalianwallah Bagh massacre and massacred every pandit that were heading towards parliament to ask for what they were promised.

“Give us vote we'll make buses free” (while state is at major debt lol) - Telangana

I would call BJP stupid if they didn't use this. Congress got 21 lawyers to fight against the ram mandir case. How is that not appeasement?

Congress filed affidavit that Rama is just a myth and entire sanatan is mythical. How is that not interfering with religion? Who the fuck asked congress with their IQ of my little brothers shoes their opinion on my prabhu?

Recently Arvind Kejriwal was caught in corruption, he gave 101 crores I think, that's 1.01 BILLION rupees to Waqf Board how is that not appeasement?

Why are you guys acting so naive???? That's a POLITICAL PARTY they want voters lol and we'd rather prefer them than those who would give our tax money to the godforsaken waqf board.

Continuation of previous anon.

Fuck congress <3

Anon these people don't WANT to change their minds. They're comfortable with their hatred as they are.

[talphaend]

Indian Politics: A Dynamic Democracy Navigating Challenges and Aspirations

India, the world’s largest democracy, boasts a vibrant yet complex political landscape shaped by its diversity, historical legacy, and evolving socio-economic priorities. Governed by a parliamentary system enshrined in its 1950 Constitution, Indian politics reflects both democratic ideals and persistent challenges, from corruption to identity-based divisions. This essay explores the structure, key players, contemporary issues, and future prospects of Indian politics in 2025.

1. Political Framework and Democratic Structure

India operates as a federal parliamentary republic, with power divided among the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. The President serves as the ceremonial head, while the Prime Minister leads the government. The bicameral Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha (Lower House) and Rajya Sabha (Upper House), representing the people and states, respectively .

The 2024 general elections saw Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secure a third term, albeit reliant on alliances with regional parties like the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and Janata Dal (United) . This underscores the growing influence of regional parties, which dominate states such as West Bengal (Trinamool Congress) and Tamil Nadu (DMK) .

2. Key Political Parties and Electoral Dynamics

India’s multi-party system features national and regional players. The BJP and Indian National Congress (INC) remain dominant nationally, while regional parties advocate state-specific agendas. The 2024 elections highlighted voter turnout at 67%, with youth and digital campaigns playing pivotal roles . However, challenges like electoral fraud allegations and the criminalization of politics persist, with many legislators facing criminal charges .

The BJP’s consolidation since 2014 has reshaped politics, emphasizing Hindu nationalism, economic reforms, and centralization. Critics argue this has marginalized minorities and weakened federalism, while supporters credit it with infrastructure growth and global stature .

3. Challenges in Indian Politics

A. Corruption and Governance

Corruption remains systemic, exemplified by scandals like the 2G Spectrum scam. Initiatives like the Lokpal Act and digital governance (e.g., Digital India) aim to enhance transparency, yet implementation gaps endure .

B. Identity Politics

Caste and religion often dictate electoral strategies. The BJP’s policies, such as revoking Jammu and Kashmir’s autonomy (Article 370), have intensified debates on secularism and minority rights .

C. Security and Internal Conflict

The 2025 Pahalgam terror attack, attributed to Pakistan-based militants, reignited India-Pakistan tensions and scrutiny of intelligence failures . Meanwhile, Naxalite insurgencies in Chhattisgarh and ethnic violence in Manipur underscore internal security challenges .

D. Economic Disparities

Despite being a $3.7 trillion economy, wealth inequality and unemployment persist. Welfare schemes like MNREGA and PM-KISAN aim to alleviate poverty, yet informal sector workers (94% of the workforce) remain vulnerable .

4. Recent Developments and Policy Shifts

A. BJP’s Third Term Agenda

Modi’s 2024–2029 agenda focuses on “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India), defense modernization, and Hindu cultural revival. The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, sparked protests in West Bengal, reflecting tensions over religious property rights .

B. Foreign Policy and Global Partnerships

The 2025 U.S.-India COMPACT initiative strengthened defense and trade ties, including co-production of Javelin missiles and a $500 billion trade target by 2030 . India’s leadership in the G20 and Quad alliances underscores its rising global influence .

C. Social Reforms

The Women’s Reservation Bill (pending) and appointments like Rekha Gupta as Delhi’s Chief Minister signal incremental progress in gender representation .

5. The Road Ahead: Opportunities and Reforms

A. Youth and Digital Engagement

With 65% of the population under 35, youth-driven movements and digital platforms (e.g., MyGov) are reshaping political participation .

B. Judicial and Electoral Reforms

Calls to decriminalize politics and abolish sedition laws (IPC 124A) highlight the need for judicial accountability . The Election Commission’s use of EVMs and VVPATs aims to ensure fair elections .

C. Sustainable Development

Initiatives like the Green Hydrogen Mission and amendments to nuclear liability laws (CLNDA) aim to balance energy security and climate goals .

Conclusion

Indian politics, a tapestry of democracy and diversity, faces a critical juncture in 2025. While the BJP’s dominance reflects a shift toward majoritarianism, regional parties and civil society push for pluralism and equity. Addressing corruption, enhancing inclusivity, and fostering youth leadership will determine whether India realizes its potential as a global democratic exemplar. As historian Ramachandra Guha noted, India’s democracy is “a marathon, not a sprint”—a testament to its resilience amid evolving challenges .

References: Insights synthesized from constitutional frameworks , electoral dynamics , policy initiatives , and contemporary events .

[primefeedsofficial]

What Is the Waqf Bill?

Waqf Bill: A Complete Overview of Its Purpose, Provisions, and Impact

The Waqf Bill is a legislative framework designed to regulate and manage waqf properties more effectively. Waqf, an Islamic endowment of property for religious or charitable purposes, plays a crucial role in supporting community welfare.

The Waqf Bill aims to enhance transparency, prevent mismanagement, and ensure that these assets are utilized for their intended purposes.

What Is the Waqf Bill?

The Waqf Bill is a proposed or enacted law that governs the administration and supervision of waqf properties. These properties include land, buildings, and other assets donated under Islamic law for religious, educational, or charitable purposes.

Objectives of the Waqf Bill

The primary goals of the Waqf Bill include:

Preventing Misuse: Ensuring waqf properties are not illegally occupied or misused.

Improving Transparency: Mandating proper audits and records for all waqf assets.

Enhancing Revenue Generation: Optimizing the use of waqf properties to generate funds for community development.

Strengthening Governance: Establishing clear guidelines for waqf boards and administrators.

Key Provisions of the Waqf Bill

The Waqf Bill introduces several important provisions to streamline the management of waqf properties:

1.Digitalization of Waqf Records

All waqf properties must be registered in a centralized digital database.

This helps in tracking ownership, preventing encroachment, and ensuring accountability.

2. Strict Penalties for Unauthorized Use

Unlawful occupation or sale of waqf land can lead to heavy fines and imprisonment.

This discourages illegal possession and ensures properties remain dedicated to their original purpose.

3. Formation of State and Central Waqf Councils

These councils oversee the functioning of waqf boards and resolve disputes.

They also ensure compliance with the Waqf Bill regulations.

 4. Leasing and Commercial Use of Waqf Properties

The bill allows waqf boards to lease properties for commercial purposes.

Revenue generated can fund educational institutions, healthcare, and other charitable activities.

Benefits of the Waqf Bill

The Waqf Bill brings several advantages to the management of Islamic endowments:

1. Protection of Waqf Assets

Prevents illegal encroachment and ensures properties are used as per the donor’s wishes.

2. Economic Empowerment

Revenue from waqf properties can support scholarships, hospitals, and poverty alleviation programs.

3. Improved Accountability

Regular audits and digital records reduce corruption and mismanagement.

4. Community Development

Funds from waqf assets can be used to build schools, mosques, and community centers.

Challenges in Implementing the Waqf Bill

Despite its benefits, the Waqf Bill faces several challenges:

1. Legal Disputes Over Waqf Properties

Many waqf lands are entangled in prolonged court cases, delaying their productive use.

2. Lack of Awareness

Many Muslims are unaware of their rights regarding waqf properties, leading to underutilization.

3. Political Interference

Some politicians influence waqf boards for personal gains, undermining the bill’s objectives.

4. Administrative Delays

Bureaucratic hurdles slow down the implementation of reforms under the Waqf Bill.

How Does the Waqf Bill Impact Society?

The Waqf Bill has far-reaching effects on both the Muslim community and society at large:

1. Strengthening Religious Institutions

Mosques, madrasas, and Islamic centers receive better funding and maintenance.

2. Boosting Education and Healthcare

Income from waqf properties can establish schools and hospitals, benefiting all communities.

3. Reducing Poverty

Charitable initiatives funded by waqf revenues can provide financial aid to the underprivileged

Future of the Waqf Bill

The Waqf Bill is a progressive step toward better management of Islamic endowments. However, its success depends on:

Effective enforcement of laws.

Public awareness campaigns to educate Muslims about their rights.

Reduction in political interference to ensure transparency.

If implemented properly, the Waqf Bill can transform waqf properties into powerful tools for social and economic development.

Conclusion

The Waqf Bill is a crucial legal framework aimed at safeguarding and optimizing waqf properties for community welfare. By preventing misuse, enhancing transparency, and promoting economic growth, this bill has the potential to uplift millions. However, overcoming legal, administrative, and political challenges will be key to its success.

Understanding the Waqf Bill and its implications can help stakeholders—donors, administrators, and beneficiaries—work together to ensure these religious endowments serve their true purpose. 

[odnewsin]

BJD has made deal with BJP to evade arrest for 24 years of scams & corruptions: Sofia Firdous

Odisha’s political scene is ablaze as Congress MLA Sofia Firdous accuses BJD of secret deals with BJP over the Waqf Bill, targeting MP Debashish Samantaray for evasive comments.

[pooma-islam]

Let's Introspect

தன்னிலை உணர்வோம்

💥The Waqf Bill has been passed today.

Are you angry? Why – are you now blaming Nitish and Naidu?

Are you accusing them of being "traitors"?

Can you truly understand who the real traitors of the community are?

It’s none other than we, the Muslims.

The Waqf and the properties under it were meant to be tools and resources for our community's development. What use was it, when we never utilized them?

Less than 4% of Muslims are in higher education.

Among Muslim children aged 6–14, 25% have never gone to school or have dropped out.

Only 3% of central government jobs are held by Muslims.

Urban poverty among Muslims is at 38.4% – worse than even Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes.

And still...

India has 6 lakh acres of Waqf land. Over 500,000 properties.

We could have built:

Thousands of schools...

Hundreds of hospitals...

Dozens of universities and medical colleges...

Hostels for poor students...

Welfare centers for women and senior citizens...

Marriage assistance for poor women...

And many other welfare schemes...

But did we? No...

Let’s face the reality here – without bias.

There is not a single Waqf-supported medical college in India that provides MBBS education at a subsidized rate for poor Muslim students. Not even one.

Yes, there are private Muslim colleges – but they charge fees like all the others. Waqf land could have changed that. But no one bothered.

Why...?

Because 70% of Waqf land is encroached upon or misused.

Waqf Boards are filled with corruption and are influenced by politicians and self-serving individuals.

There is no proper, transparent planning. No community vision. No sense of responsibility.

We are always quick to blame others. But how often do we ask:

What did we do with our own resources?

Instead of shouting about religious pride, we should have at least learned from others. Did we?

Christians have the Vellore CMC Hospital – world-class and providing treatment to all at affordable costs.

Jains and Sikhs run hostels, hospitals, and educational trusts.

We Muslims, without valid reason, argue. We complain. We fight. That’s all.

We cry about being backward – and that’s precisely why we remain backward. Worse, we either deny or forget this truth.

Waqf is not just land. It should have been a living heartbeat.

Today, it is a lost legacy.

But don’t worry.

The future generations – deaf, mute, and uneducated – won’t even ask, “You had everything. Why didn’t you do anything?”

Because chances are, they won’t even know what Waqf is.

You were born just to eat – varieties of mutton, chicken, biryani, and more. That’s it. Just to taste these, then go sleep.

All you do is share old videos of Rajiv Gandhi and politicians. But you don’t think deeply, act decisively, or build constructively.

Our criticisms are mostly reactive – we act only by seeing others. Independent thinking? Even a small percentage is doubtful.

Despite having so much Waqf property, no real benefit has reached the poor and needy to this day. This is the undeniable, unforgettable truth.

We must accept it. Empty debates are lifeless... This is the harsh reality here.

Will the Muslim community finally open its eyes? Doubtful.

So now that the Waqf Bill has been passed, don't panic. As usual, we’ll just pass the days believing, "Allah will take care of everything."

These are just words that spilled out from a hurt and burning heart...

💥வக்ஃப் மசோதா, இன்று நிறைவேற்றப்பட்டு விட்டது.

கோபமா.? ஏன் - இப்போது நிதிஷ், நாயுடுவை , குறை கூறுகிறீர்களா.?

'துரோகிகள்' என்று அவர்களை குற்றம் சாட்டுகிறீர்களா.?

சமுதாயத்தின் முக்கியமான துரோகி யார் என்று உணர முடிகிறதா...

அது, வேறு யாருமல்ல முஸ்லிம்களாகிய நாம் தான்.

வக்ஃப் மற்றும், அதன் கீழ் உள்ள சொத்துக்கள், எங்கள் மேம்பாட்டுக்கான கருவியாக / துணையாக இருந்தது. என்ன பலன், நாங்கள் அதை பயன்படுத்தவில்லை.

4% க்கும் குறைவான முஸ்லிம்கள், உயர்கல்வியில் உள்ளனர்.

6-14 வயதுடைய முஸ்லிம் குழந்தைகளில் 25% பேர் ஒருபோதும் பள்ளிக்குச் செல்லவில்லை, அல்லது பள்ளியை விட்டு வெளியேறவில்லை.

மத்திய அரசு வேலைகளில் 3% மட்டுமே முஸ்லிம்கள் பணி செய்கிறார்கள்.

முஸ்லிம்களிடையே, நகர்ப்ப��ற வறுமை விகிதம் 38.4% - எஸ்சி./எஸ்டிகளை விட மிகவும் மோசமான நிலையில் உள்ளது.

இன்னும்…

இந்தியாவில் 6 லட்சம் ஏக்கர் வக்ஃப் நிலம் உள்ளது. 5 லட்சத்திற்கும் அதிகமான சொத்துக்கள் உள்ளன.

நாம் கட்டியிருக்கலாம்:

ஆயிரக்கணக்கான பள்ளிகளை ....

நூற்றுக்கணக்கான, மருத்துவமனைகளை ....

டஜன் கணக்கான பல்கலைக்கழகங்களை, மற்றும் மருத்துவக் கல்லூரிகளை ....

ஏழை மாணவர்களுக்கான விடுதிகளை ....

பெண்கள் மற்றும் மூத்த குடிமக்களுக்கான நல மையங்கள் ...

ஏழைப் பெண்களுக்கான திருமண உதவிகள்...

இன்னும் என்னென்னவோ நலத் திட்டங்கள் ....

செய்தோமா. இல்லையே...

இங்கு, யதார்த்தத்தை எதிர்கொள்வோம், பாரபட்சம் இன்றி

ஏழை முஸ்லிம் மாணவர்களுக்கு, மானிய விலையில் எம்.பி.பிஎஸ் . கல்வியை வழங்கும் வக்ஃப் ஆதரவு பெற்ற மருத்துவக் கல்லூரி, இந்தியாவில் இல்லை. ஒன்று கூட இல்லை.

ஆம், தனியார் முஸ்லிம் கல்லூரிகள் உள்ளன - ஆனால் அவை மற்றவற்றைப் போலவே, கட்டணம் வசூலிக்கின்றன. வக்ஃப் நிலம் அதை மாற்றியிருக்க முடியும். ஆனால் அதைக் கண்டு கொள்ளவே இல்லை.

ஏன் ...?

வக்ஃப் நிலத்தில் 70% ஆக்கிரமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது, அல்லது தவறாகப் பயன்படுத்தப்படுகிறது.

வக்ஃப் வாரியங்கள், ஊழல் மற்றும் அரசியலால், அரசியல்வாதிகளால், சுயநலவாதிகளால், நிறைந்துள்ளன.

இங்கு முறையான தெளிவான திட்டமிடல் இல்லை. சமூக பார்வை இல்லை. பொறுப்புணர்வு இல்லை.

நாம் மற்றவர்களைக் குறை கூற அவசரப்படுகிறோம். ஆனால் அரிதாகவே கேள்வி கேட்கிறோம்:

நமது சொந்த வளங்களை நாம் என்ன செய்தோம்.?

மத மகத்துவத்தைப் பற்றி கூச்சலிடுவதற்குப் பதிலாக, குறைந்தபட்சம் மற்றவர்களிடமிருந்து, கற்றுக்கொண்டிருக்க வேண்டும். செய்தோமா.

கிறிஸ்தவர்களுக்கு வேலூர் சி.எம்.சி மருத்துவ மனை உள்ளது - உலகத் தரம் வாய்ந்தது, மற்றும் மலிவு விலையில் அனைவருக்கும் சிகிச்சை தரப்படுகிறது.

சமணர்கள், மற்றும் சீக்கியர்கள், விடுதிகள், மருத்துவமனைகள், மற்றும் கல்வி அறக்கட்டளைகளை நடத்துகிறார்கள்.

நாங்கள் இஸ்லாமியர்கள, தகுந்த காரணம் இன்றி வாதிடுகிறோம். நாங்கள் வருத்தப்படுகிறோம். நாங்கள் போராடுகிறோம். அவ்வளவுதான்.

பின்தங்கியிருப்பதற்காக , நாங்கள் அழுகிறோம் - ஆதனால்தான் நாங்கள் பின்தங்கி இருக்கிறோம். அததோடு, இந்த உண்மையை உணரவும், மறுக்கிறோம் / மறக்கிறோம்.

வக்ஃப் என்பது வெறும் நிலம் அல்ல. இது ஒரு உயிர்நாடியாக இருக்க வேண்டும்.

இன்று, அது ஒரு இழந்த மரபு.

ஆனால் கவலைப்பட வேண்டாம்.

இனி வரவிருக்கின்ற, எங்கள் தலைமுறையினர் - காது கேளாதவர்கள், ஊமைகள், படிக்காதவர்கள் - கேட்க மாட்டார்கள் - "உனக்கு எல்லாம் இருந்த தே. ஏன் எதுவும் செய்யவில்லை?" என்று கேட்கக்கூட மாட்டார்கள்.!.

ஏனெனில் வக்ஃப் என்றால் என்ன, என்று கூட அவர்களுக்குத் தெரிய, வாய்ப்பு இருக்காது.

நீங்கள் இங்கு பிறந்தது, சாப்பிடுவதற்கு மாத்திரமே, விதவிதமான உணவு வகைகள் மட்டன், சிக்கன், பிரியாணி வகைகள். அவ்வளவுதான், இவைகளை சுவைப்பதற்கு மட்டுமே. ஆதலால் நன்றாக சாப்பிட்டுவிட்டு தூங்கச் சென்று விடுகிறீர்கள்.

நீங்கள் செய்வதெல்லாம் ராஜீவ் காந்தி, மற்றும் அரசியல்வாதிகளின் டிவிட்களை பகிர்வது மாத்திரமே. நிச்சயமாக உருப்படியாக, உறுதியாக எதையும், சிந்தித்து ஆக்கப்பூர்வமாக செயல்படுத்துவது கிடையாது.

நமது விமர்சனங்கள், கூடுமான வரை, எல்லாமே மற்றவர்களை பார்த்து தான் செயல்படுகிறோம்.

சுயமாக சிந்திப்பது என்பது ஒரு சிறிய சதவீதம் கூட இருக்குமா என்பது சந்தேகமே.

இவ்வளவு வக்ப் சொத்து இருந்தும், ஏழை எளியவர்களுக்கு இன்று வரை எந்த நன்மையும் சென்று அடையவில்லை, இதுதான் இங்கு மறக்க முடியாத / மறுக்க முடியாத, உண்மை.

இதை ஏற்றுத்தான் ஆக வேண்டும், வீண் விவாதம் செய்வதில் உயிர் இல்லை... இதுதான் இங்கு கொடூரமான உண்மை.

இனிமேலாவது இந்த முஸ்லிம் சமுதாயம், கண் திறக்குமா.? சந்தேகம்தான்.

ஆதலால் வக்ஃப் மசோதா நிறைவேற்றப்பட்டுவிட்டது, என்பதை நினைத்து எந்தவிதமான பதற்றமும் கொள்ள வேண்டாம். வழக்கம்போல, எல்லாம் இறைவன் பார்த்துக் கொள்வான் என்ற எண்ணத்தில் / நம்பிக்கையில், கடந்து செல்வோம் எஞ்சி இருக்கும் நாட்களை .

மன��் நொந்து / வெந்து வெளிவந்த வார்த்தைகள் தான் இவை.......

[samajtaknewschaneel]

Voting on Waqf (Amendment) Bill in Lok Sabha: Complete Information:

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2025 was put to vote in the Lok Sabha on Monday and was passed with a majority. This bill introduces new provisions for the management and resolution of disputes related to Waqf properties. However, it sparked intense debates between the ruling party and the opposition.

SamajTaknewsChannel

Key Provisions of the Bill:

Monitoring of Waqf Properties: The government has been granted more authority to oversee and manage Waqf Board properties.

Reorganization of Waqf Tribunal: The bill includes a provision for appointing non-Muslim judges in Waqf tribunals.

Dispute Resolution Process: Legal procedures have been amended to ensure faster resolution of Waqf-related disputes.

Reactions from the Government and Opposition:

Opposition's Protest: The Congress, Samajwadi Party, and Trinamool Congress opposed the bill. Rahul Gandhi criticized it as an attack on minority rights, while other leaders argued that it could make Muslim properties controversial.

Government's Stand: The government defended the bill as a step towards transparency and the elimination of corruption in the management of Waqf properties.

Voting Outcome and Next Steps:

The bill was passed in Lok Sabha with 288 votes in favor and 232 against.

The opposition's proposed amendments were rejected.

Now, the bill will be introduced in the Rajya Sabha, where further debates are expected.

This bill is likely to continue being a subject of political and social discussions in the coming days.

[rightnewshindi]

हरियाणा में 58 साल पुराना धार्मिक विवाद: गुरुद्वारा या मस्जिद? संसद के नए बिल ने बदली कहानी!

Haryana News: हरियाणा में एक धार्मिक स्थल को लेकर सिख और मुस्लिम समुदाय के बीच 58 साल से चल रही कानूनी जंग में नया मोड़ आ गया है। हाल ही में संसद में एक बिल संशोधन के बाद सिख समाज में खुशी की लहर दौड़ पड़ी है, जबकि मुस्लिम समुदाय इसे अपनी 200 साल पुरानी मस्जिद बताकर दावा ठोक रहा है। यह विवाद 1947 के देश विभाजन से शुरू हुआ और सुप्रीम कोर्ट तक पहुंचा, लेकिन अब तक कोई स्थायी हल नहीं निकल सका। दोनों…

[news365timesindia]

[ad_1] Paromita Das New Delhi: The Waqf Amendment Bill, set to be tabled in the Parliament, has sparked a heated debate within the Muslim community. While some see it as a much-needed reform to bring transparency and efficiency to the management of Waqf properties, others fear it could lead to undue government interference in religious endowments. One of the most vocal supporters of the Bill is Haji Syed Salman Chishty, the chief of Ajmer Sharif Dargah, who has described it as a “crucial reform.” However, his endorsement has been met with resistance from other Muslim authorities, reflecting a broader divide on the issue. Ajmer Sharif Dargah Chief’s Perspective on the Waqf Amendment Bill In an opinion piece published in The Hindu, Chishty emphasized the Bill’s potential to address the long-standing inefficiencies of the Waqf Board. He pointed out that Waqf institutions, despite their vast resource base, have failed to uplift the socio-economic status of the Muslim community due to mismanagement and lack of transparency. He cited the Sachar Committee Report of 2006, which estimated that Waqf properties had the potential to generate an annual income of Rs 12,000 crore. However, recent surveys suggest that with inflation-adjusted figures, this number could rise to Rs 20,000 crore annually. Yet, the actual revenue generated remains a mere Rs 200 crore. According to Chishty, this stark discrepancy highlights the urgent need for structural reforms. Chishty also underscored that the Bill aims to curb corruption by holding custodians of Waqf properties (mutawallis) accountable. “By overhauling the governance and administration of Waqf boards and the Central Waqf Council, the Bill seeks to create a more accountable and transparent system that can better serve the community,” he wrote. Dissenting Voices: Concerns of Other Muslim Authorities Despite Chishty’s strong advocacy, several Muslim leaders and scholars have expressed concerns over the implications of the Waqf Amendment Bill. Critics argue that while reforms are necessary, the Bill may provide excessive governmental control over Waqf properties, potentially diminishing the autonomy of the Muslim community in managing its own religious endowments. Prominent Islamic scholars and Waqf Board members from various states have voiced apprehensions that the Bill could lead to centralization of power, making it easier for authorities to take over Waqf assets under the pretext of “better management.” Some fear that the amendment might pave the way for political misuse, similar to previous cases where Waqf land was allegedly acquired for commercial and governmental projects. Government’s Response and Public Reaction Union Minister Kiren Rijiju responded to Chishty’s article by acknowledging the necessity of reforms. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), he stated, “By embracing reform and demanding accountability, we can ensure that the Waqf serves its intended purpose of benefiting the Muslim community and contributing to the broader society.” While the government maintains that the Bill will bring much-needed transparency, opposition parties and some religious leaders have questioned its timing and intent. Several Muslim organizations have called for a more inclusive approach, demanding consultations with key stakeholders before passing the legislation. Potential Impact of the Waqf Amendment Bill If implemented effectively, the Waqf Amendment Bill could unlock vast financial resources for the development of Muslim educational and healthcare institutions. Proper governance mechanisms could ensure that Waqf properties are used efficiently to benefit the community rather than remaining mired in corruption and litigation. However, if the Bill is seen as an attempt to infringe upon the independence of Waqf institutions, it could lead to widespread unrest. Striking a balance between transparency and autonomy will be crucial to gaining the trust of all stakeholders. Is Reform the Right Path Forward?

The debate surrounding the Waqf Amendment Bill reflects a broader struggle between modernization and tradition within the Muslim community. While the inefficiencies in Waqf management are undeniable, any reform should be carried out with the active participation of the community. A top-down approach without consultation could backfire, leading to mistrust and resistance. The real question is not whether reforms are needed, but how they should be implemented. The government must ensure that the new legislation does not become a tool for political maneuvering but genuinely serves the interests of the community. Transparency and accountability are essential, but so is the preservation of religious autonomy. The Waqf Amendment Bill is at the center of a crucial debate that has divided Muslim authorities. While some see it as an opportunity for reform, others fear it may lead to excessive government control. The only way forward is through constructive dialogue, where concerns are addressed, and a balanced approach is adopted. If executed properly, the Bill could transform Waqf institutions into powerful engines of socio-economic development. However, failure to build consensus could deepen divisions within the community. The coming months will be pivotal in determining the future of Waqf governance in Bharat.     The post Muslim Authorities Divided on Waqf Amendment Bill: Reform or Controversy? appeared first on Global Governance News- Asia's First Bilingual News portal for Global News and Updates. [ad_2] Source link

[arjasrikanth]

*The Waqf (Amendment) Bill* , 2024, has ignited fierce debates in India regarding governance, minority rights, and *state intervention in religious affairs.*

While the government promotes the bill as a means to enhance *transparency* and *combat corruption* in the management of Waqf properties, critics view it as an *infringement* on the autonomy of Muslim institutions.

Key provisions, such as *mandating non-Muslim members* on Waqf boards and *transferring adjudicatory powers* to District Collectors, have provoked *widespread* protests and fears of *political encroachment* .

The bill's implications extend beyond legal amendments, challenging the *essence of India's secular framework* .

As Parliament reviews the bill, its outcome may redefine the balance between *community governance and state control* over religious properties.

http://arjasrikanth.in/2025/03/21/waqfquake-2024-the-seismic-shift-in-indias-religious-property-law/

[vougevibesfashion]

The Waqf Amendment Bill 2024: Key Changes, Impact, and Controversies

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 8, 2024, aims to reform the management and regulation of Waqf properties in India. This legislative proposal seeks to amend the existing Waqf Act of 1995, addressing various administrative, legal, and structural issues to enhance transparency, efficiency, and inclusivity in Waqf administration. The bill has sparked considerable debate, reflecting its significance and the diverse perspectives surrounding its provisions.

Understanding Waqf and Its Governance

A Waqf is a charitable endowment under Islamic law, wherein a person dedicates movable or immovable property for religious or charitable purposes, with the stipulation that the property cannot be sold or transferred. The Waqf Act of 1995 governs the administration of such properties in India, mandating the establishment of Waqf Boards in each state to oversee their management. These boards are responsible for ensuring that Waqf properties are utilized in accordance with the donor's intentions and for the benefit of the community.

Key Amendments Proposed in the Bill

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, introduces several significant changes to the existing framework:

Renaming of the Act: The bill proposes to rename the Waqf Act, 1995, as the "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, 1995" (UWMEEDA 1995). This change reflects a broader vision for Waqf management, emphasizing unity and development.

Definition and Declaration of Waqf: To enhance clarity, the bill stipulates that only individuals who have practiced Islam for at least five years can declare a Waqf, and they must own the property being endowed. Additionally, the concept of "waqf by user," where long-term use could lead to recognition as Waqf property, is proposed to be removed. The bill also ensures that "waqf-alal-aulad" (family Waqf) does not infringe upon the inheritance rights of heirs, including women.

Survey and Registration of Waqf Properties: The responsibility for surveying Waqf properties is to be assigned to district collectors or designated officers, aiming for more accurate and authoritative assessments. The bill also proposes the creation of a central portal for Waqf registration, auditing, and financial management to promote transparency and accessibility.

Composition of Waqf Boards and Councils: The bill mandates a more inclusive composition of the Central Waqf Council and State Waqf Boards by including non-Muslims, women, and representatives from various Muslim communities such as Shia, Sunni, Bohra, and Agakhani sects. This aims to reflect the diversity within the Muslim community and ensure broader representation.

Establishment of Separate Waqf Boards: Provisions are made for establishing separate Waqf boards for specific Muslim sects, including the Bohra and Agakhani communities, to cater to their unique needs and practices.

Reform of Waqf Tribunals: The bill proposes restructuring Waqf Tribunals to consist of two members and allows appeals against their orders to the High Court within ninety days, thereby providing an additional layer of judicial oversight.

Anticipated Impact of the Amendments

The proposed amendments are expected to have several implications:

Enhanced Transparency and Accountability: By introducing e-governance practices and centralizing data, the bill aims to reduce corruption and mismanagement in Waqf properties.

Inclusive Representation: The inclusion of diverse community members in Waqf boards and councils seeks to democratize decision-making processes and ensure that various perspectives are considered.

Streamlined Dispute Resolution: Reforming the tribunal system and allowing appeals to higher courts could lead to more efficient and fair adjudication of disputes related to Waqf properties.

Controversies and Criticisms

Despite its intended benefits, the bill has faced criticism from various quarters:

Perceived Erosion of Autonomy: Some community leaders and organizations argue that the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf boards may dilute the Islamic character of these institutions and infringe upon religious autonomy.

Legal and Constitutional Debates: Critics contend that certain provisions of the bill might conflict with constitutional protections of religious freedom and property rights, leading to potential legal challenges.

Conclusion

The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, represents a significant effort to reform the management of Waqf properties in India. While it proposes measures to enhance transparency, inclusivity, and efficiency, the bill also raises important questions about religious autonomy, administrative feasibility, and legal coherence. As the bill undergoes further scrutiny and debate, it will be crucial to balance the objectives of reform with the concerns of the communities it aims to serve.

[lokmarg1]

Maulana Shahabuddin, National President of the All India Muslim Jamaat, addressed concerns surrounding the Waqf Amendment Bill, assuring Muslims that it will not pose any threat to mosques, madrasas, or dargahs.

[thellawtoknow]

The Judiciary in Indonesia 101: Structure, Challenges, and Prospects for Reform

The Judiciary in Indonesia: Structure, Challenges, and Prospects for Reform Structure of the Indonesian JudiciaryGeneral Courts (Peradilan Umum) Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama) Military Courts (Peradilan Militer) State Administrative Courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) The Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) Interconnection and Oversight Challenges Facing the Indonesian Judiciary Reforms and Prospects for the Future Prominent Cases in Indonesian Judiciary History1. The Bank Century Scandal (2008) 2. The Munir Said Thalib Assassination Case (2004) 3. The Bali Bombings Trials (2002 and 2005) 4. The 2017 Blasphemy Case Against Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) 5. The Hambalang Corruption Scandal (2012) 6. The Freeport Contract Dispute (2017) 7. The 2019 Presidential Election Dispute Conclusion The Judiciary in Indonesia: Structure, Challenges, and Prospects for Reform The judiciary in Indonesia plays a pivotal role in maintaining the rule of law, safeguarding constitutional principles, and ensuring justice within the framework of a rapidly evolving democratic society. Since its independence in 1945, Indonesia has experienced significant political, social, and legal transformations, shaping its judicial system into the complex entity it is today. This essay explores the structure of Indonesia's judiciary, its challenges, and ongoing reforms to enhance its efficiency and credibility.

Structure of the Indonesian Judiciary The judiciary in Indonesia is a vital institution, serving as the guardian of law and justice in the nation’s democratic framework. Its structure reflects Indonesia's colonial history and evolving legal needs. As a civil law system, heavily influenced by Dutch traditions, the judiciary operates under the principles enshrined in the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945). Below is an in-depth exploration of its components, including their jurisdiction, roles, and significance. General Courts (Peradilan Umum) The General Courts are the foundation of Indonesia's judicial system, addressing the majority of civil and criminal cases. These courts are hierarchical, consisting of the following levels: - District Courts (Pengadilan Negeri): - These are trial courts of first instance, found in every regency or city. - They handle civil disputes, criminal cases, and minor offenses. - District courts are also tasked with preliminary hearings and issuing warrants in criminal cases. - Judges in these courts are appointed and supervised by the Supreme Court, ensuring consistency in their rulings. - High Courts (Pengadilan Tinggi): - Functioning as appellate courts, they review decisions made by district courts within their jurisdiction. - High courts are established in each province, addressing errors in fact or law from lower court judgments. - They provide oversight and guidance to district courts to maintain judicial standards. - Supreme Court (Mahkamah Agung): - At the apex of the General Courts hierarchy, the Supreme Court serves as the final appellate body. - It reviews cases based on legal interpretation rather than factual disputes. - The Supreme Court is also responsible for ensuring uniform application of laws across the judicial system. - It supervises all lower courts, including specialized courts, and plays a significant role in judicial training and administration. Religious Courts (Peradilan Agama) Religious Courts cater to the personal legal needs of Indonesia's Muslim majority, addressing matters governed by Islamic law. These courts operate independently within the judiciary and have a distinct jurisdiction: - Scope of Jurisdiction: - Religious courts handle issues such as marriage, divorce, inheritance, child custody, and charitable endowments (waqf). - Their jurisdiction applies exclusively to individuals who voluntarily submit to their authority under Islamic law. - Structure: - Similar to the General Courts, Religious Courts have a two-tiered system, comprising trial courts and appellate courts. - The Supreme Court oversees Religious Courts, ensuring their rulings align with national legal standards. - Cultural and Religious Relevance: - Religious Courts reflect Indonesia's commitment to accommodating the diverse religious practices of its population. - They are integral to maintaining social harmony by providing a culturally sensitive legal framework. Military Courts (Peradilan Militer) Military Courts are a specialized system dealing with cases involving members of the Indonesian Armed Forces. Their establishment acknowledges the unique legal requirements of military personnel: - Jurisdiction: - These courts address violations of military law, disciplinary offenses, and general crimes committed by military members. - Structure: - Military Courts operate in a hierarchical structure, with trial courts, appellate courts, and a supervisory body under the Supreme Court. - The composition of these courts includes military judges trained in both law and military discipline. - Challenges: - The Military Courts face criticism for a perceived lack of transparency and accountability, especially in cases involving human rights abuses or crimes against civilians. State Administrative Courts (Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara) State Administrative Courts were established to address disputes between citizens and the government regarding administrative decisions: - Jurisdiction: - These courts review the legality of government actions, decisions, or policies that directly affect citizens’ rights. - Examples of cases include disputes over permits, licensing, and public service obligations. - Structure: - The system includes trial and appellate levels, with the Supreme Court serving as the final authority. - Administrative courts provide a mechanism for checks and balances, ensuring that governmental actions adhere to the law. - Significance: - These courts are vital in upholding administrative justice, fostering transparency, and promoting accountability in public administration. The Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) Established in 2003, the Constitutional Court is a cornerstone of Indonesia’s democratic governance. It plays a distinct and critical role in the judiciary: - Jurisdiction: - The Constitutional Court adjudicates disputes over the constitutionality of laws, providing judicial review to ensure legislation aligns with the 1945 Constitution. - It resolves conflicts between state institutions and addresses disputes related to general elections, including presidential and legislative elections. - The Court also reviews motions for impeachment against the president or vice president. - Structure and Composition: - The Court consists of nine justices, appointed by the president, the legislature, and the Supreme Court. - This tripartite appointment mechanism aims to ensure a balance of power and judicial independence. - Impact: - The Constitutional Court has played a pivotal role in fostering constitutionalism and protecting fundamental rights. - Its decisions often have far-reaching implications for Indonesia’s political and legal landscapes. Interconnection and Oversight The judiciary operates as an interconnected system, with the Supreme Court at its pinnacle, overseeing the General, Religious, Military, and State Administrative Courts. This unified structure ensures consistency in the application of the law. Additionally, the Constitutional Court serves as a specialized guardian of the Constitution, complementing the broader judicial framework. The Indonesian judiciary is a multifaceted institution designed to address the legal needs of a diverse and populous nation. Its structure, encompassing General, Religious, Military, and State Administrative Courts, along with the Constitutional Court, reflects the country’s legal pluralism and commitment to justice. Despite challenges such as corruption, political interference, and limited access to justice, the judiciary remains a crucial pillar of Indonesia’s democratic system. Ongoing reforms aimed at enhancing its independence, efficiency, and accountability will be vital in ensuring that it continues to serve the principles of the rule of law. Challenges Facing the Indonesian Judiciary Despite its robust framework, Indonesia’s judiciary faces significant challenges that hinder its capacity to deliver impartial justice: - Corruption: Judicial corruption remains a pervasive issue, undermining public confidence in the legal system. High-profile cases involving judicial misconduct highlight the need for stringent oversight mechanisms. - Judicial Independence: While the Constitution guarantees judicial independence, political interference often compromises this principle, particularly in cases involving high-ranking officials or politically sensitive matters. - Access to Justice: Many Indonesians, particularly in rural areas, face barriers to accessing justice due to economic disparities, geographic challenges, and limited legal awareness. - Case Backlogs: A high volume of pending cases across various courts strains judicial resources, leading to delays in justice delivery and overburdening judges. - Human Rights Violations: The judiciary has been criticized for its handling of human rights cases, including those related to freedom of speech, minority rights, and environmental disputes, reflecting broader systemic weaknesses in upholding democratic principles. Reforms and Prospects for the Future Efforts to reform Indonesia's judiciary have intensified in recent decades, focusing on improving transparency, accountability, and efficiency: - Anti-Corruption Measures: The establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, KPK) has been instrumental in combating corruption within the judiciary. However, challenges persist, requiring stronger institutional support and public engagement. - Judicial Training and Professional Development: Programs aimed at enhancing the competence and ethical standards of judges and court personnel are vital to restoring public trust and ensuring fair adjudication. - Technological Integration: The adoption of e-court systems and digital case management platforms is improving procedural efficiency and accessibility, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when remote hearings became a necessity. - Decentralization and Access to Justice: Expanding legal aid services and decentralizing court systems can address geographical and socioeconomic barriers, bringing justice closer to marginalized communities. - Strengthening Constitutional Oversight: The Constitutional Court has emerged as a key player in upholding democratic norms and fostering legal certainty. Its continued independence is crucial to maintaining the integrity of Indonesia’s legal framework. Prominent Cases in Indonesian Judiciary History Indonesia’s judiciary has been at the center of numerous landmark cases that have shaped the country’s legal, political, and social landscapes. These cases highlight critical issues such as corruption, human rights, constitutional interpretation, and political accountability. Below are some of the most prominent cases that underscore the judiciary's evolving role in Indonesia. 1. The Bank Century Scandal (2008) Case Overview: The Bank Century case, one of Indonesia's largest financial scandals, revolved around a controversial government bailout during the 2008 global financial crisis. The government provided a bailout of Rp 6.76 trillion (approximately $600 million), which far exceeded the initially approved amount of Rp 1.3 trillion. Allegations arose that the bailout funds were misappropriated, implicating high-ranking officials, including Vice President Boediono and Finance Minister Sri Mulyani. Judicial Proceedings: The case was investigated by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), with proceedings reaching the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. Former Bank Indonesia Deputy Governor Budi Mulya was sentenced to prison in 2014, but demands for accountability at higher levels of government persisted. Impact: The case highlighted systemic corruption and weaknesses in financial oversight. It also exposed the judiciary’s challenges in holding powerful figures accountable, despite public outcry for transparency and justice. 2. The Munir Said Thalib Assassination Case (2004) Case Overview: Munir Said Thalib, a prominent human rights activist, was poisoned with arsenic during a flight from Jakarta to Amsterdam in 2004. Munir had been an outspoken critic of human rights abuses during Indonesia’s authoritarian Suharto era and had investigated cases of military violence. Judicial Proceedings: In 2008, Pollycarpus Budihari Priyanto, a former Garuda Indonesia pilot, was convicted of Munir’s murder and sentenced to 20 years in prison. However, suspicions remained about the involvement of Indonesia's intelligence agency (BIN), as Pollycarpus was alleged to have acted on its orders. Impact: This case underscored the judiciary's inability or unwillingness to fully investigate and prosecute high-ranking officials or institutions. Munir's death remains a symbol of the fight for human rights and judicial independence in Indonesia. 3. The Bali Bombings Trials (2002 and 2005) Case Overview: The 2002 and 2005 Bali bombings were among the deadliest terrorist attacks in Indonesia, killing over 200 people, including many foreign tourists. The attacks were carried out by Jemaah Islamiyah, a militant Islamist group with ties to Al-Qaeda. Judicial Proceedings: - Three primary suspects—Amrozi, Imam Samudra, and Ali Gufron—were convicted and executed in 2008. - Other members of the network, including Umar Patek, were later apprehended and tried. Impact: The cases demonstrated the judiciary's ability to handle high-profile terrorism trials under intense domestic and international scrutiny. However, they also raised debates over the use of capital punishment and the need for stronger counter-terrorism measures. 4. The 2017 Blasphemy Case Against Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) Case Overview: Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, popularly known as Ahok, served as Jakarta’s governor and was Indonesia's most prominent Christian politician in a Muslim-majority country. During a campaign speech, Ahok referenced a Quranic verse, which was later interpreted as blasphemous by some Islamic groups. Judicial Proceedings: - Ahok was charged with blasphemy under Indonesia's controversial blasphemy laws. - Despite evidence suggesting political and religious motivations behind the charges, Ahok was sentenced to two years in prison in May 2017. Impact: The case revealed deep societal divisions along religious and ethnic lines. It also highlighted the judiciary's susceptibility to public pressure and populist movements, raising questions about judicial independence in politically charged cases. 5. The Hambalang Corruption Scandal (2012) Case Overview: The Hambalang corruption scandal involved the misappropriation of funds for a state-run sports complex project in West Java. The case implicated several high-ranking officials, including former Democratic Party chairman Anas Urbaningrum. Judicial Proceedings: - Anas Urbaningrum was convicted in 2014 and sentenced to eight years in prison for accepting bribes and laundering money. - Other officials, including Sports Minister Andi Mallarangeng, were also tried and convicted. Impact: The case emphasized the Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) critical role in tackling corruption at the highest levels of government. It also reinforced public demand for transparency and accountability in public projects. 6. The Freeport Contract Dispute (2017) Case Overview: This case revolved around a long-standing dispute between the Indonesian government and Freeport-McMoRan, a U.S.-based mining company that operated the Grasberg mine, one of the world’s largest gold and copper mines. The conflict focused on issues of resource sovereignty, environmental degradation, and profit-sharing. Judicial Proceedings: - The government invoked new mining regulations that required Freeport to divest 51% of its shares to Indonesian entities. - After years of negotiation and arbitration threats, the judiciary supported the government’s actions, facilitating a landmark agreement in 2018. Impact: This case showcased Indonesia's determination to assert greater control over its natural resources. It also highlighted the judiciary’s role in supporting government efforts to renegotiate unfair contracts with multinational corporations. 7. The 2019 Presidential Election Dispute Case Overview: The 2019 presidential election, a contentious contest between incumbent Joko Widodo and rival Prabowo Subianto, saw allegations of electoral fraud. Prabowo’s camp claimed irregularities and filed a legal challenge with the Constitutional Court. Judicial Proceedings: - The Constitutional Court reviewed evidence and heard arguments from both sides. - In June 2019, the Court ruled in favor of Joko Widodo, rejecting Prabowo's claims due to insufficient evidence. Impact: The case highlighted the Constitutional Court’s role in upholding the democratic process and resolving disputes over electoral legitimacy. Its impartial handling of the case strengthened public confidence in the judiciary as a guardian of democracy. These prominent cases illustrate the pivotal role of Indonesia’s judiciary in addressing diverse and often controversial issues. From corruption and terrorism to human rights and electoral disputes, the judiciary has been a key arbiter of justice and accountability. However, these cases also expose systemic challenges, including political interference, corruption, and institutional weaknesses. Read the full article

[odnewsin]

Waqf Bill ends era of years of injustice, corruption: Amit Shah

New Delhi: Union Home Minister Amit Shah Friday hailed the passage of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025, calling it a historic step toward ending years of injustice and corruption in the management of Waqf properties. A day after Union Home Minister Amit Shah and Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju made a strong case for the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the lower house of the Parliament, Leader…