#dude. i do computer programming. you can't just assume the path of least resistance when you code a piece of software.
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Man, this is why I always hated math class.
Khan Academy gave me this easy (or so I thought) problem to solve:
"A factory makes toys that are sold for $10 a piece. The factory has 40 workers, and they each produce 25 toys a day. The factory is open 5 days a week. What is the total value of toys the factory produces in a day?"
I said to myself, okay...
10 times 40 times 25 equals 10,000. That means the factory produces $10,000 worth of value per WORKING day.
10,000 times 5 equals 50,000. And then there are two days per week (the weekend) when no value is produced. So, per week, the total value produced is still only $50,000.
And finally, there are seven days in a full week, so $50,000 divided by 7 equals roughly $7,142.86. That's the total value of toys produced per day. Not "per work day", but "per day", as it specifically says in the problem.
But what does the teacher say as he guides us through it? 10 times 40 times 25 equals 10,000, so the answer is 10,000.
That's it. The end.
He even acknowledges: "So, you might be thinking, 'Hey wait, we didn't use all the information! We didn't use the "five days per week" information!' And yeah, as it turns out, that was information we didn't need."
'As it turns out'?! Are you kidding me right now?! I carefully read the question, precisely calculated exactly what it was asking for, taking all of the provided information into account... and now you're saying I'm supposed to have somehow magically known to ignore one of those pieces of information in order to make it easier for myself?
Just admit that your problem is worded badly, dude. UGH this kind of shit drives me crazy. Why can't people use words clearly >:(
#studyblr#math#mathematics#khan academy#adult studyblr#i legit almost failed a math class once because i read and followed the instructions exactly as they were written#instead of intentionally ignoring some bits to make it easier for myself#but it turned out i was SUPPOSED to ignore those bits. and jump to conclusions.#and assume stuff without having been given any reason to do so.#dude. i do computer programming. you can't just assume the path of least resistance when you code a piece of software.#you have to imagine every possible confusion; mistake; user error; anything that could potentially go wrong#and provide for it in your coding. and test for it. and not leave ANYTHING to chance.#so why is this math class now trying to teach me bad habits -_-#so far i've been liking khan academy okay but this is some bs
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reblogging from my studyblr sideblog, and adding my own tags:
#studyblr#math#mathematics#khan academy#adult studyblr#i legit almost failed a math class once because i read and followed the instructions exactly as they were written#instead of intentionally ignoring some bits to make it easier for myself#but it turned out i was SUPPOSED to ignore those bits. and jump to conclusions.#and assume stuff without having been given any reason to do so.#dude. i do computer programming. you can't just assume the path of least resistance when you code a piece of software.#you have to imagine every possible confusion; mistake; user error; anything that could potentially go wrong#and provide for it in your coding. and test for it. and not leave ANYTHING to chance.#so why is this math class now trying to teach me bad habits -_-#so far i've been liking khan academy okay but this is some bs
Man, this is why I always hated math class.
Khan Academy gave me this easy (or so I thought) problem to solve:
"A factory makes toys that are sold for $10 a piece. The factory has 40 workers, and they each produce 25 toys a day. The factory is open 5 days a week. What is the total value of toys the factory produces in a day?"
I said to myself, okay...
10 times 40 times 25 equals 10,000. That means the factory produces $10,000 worth of value per WORKING day.
10,000 times 5 equals 50,000. And then there are two days per week (the weekend) when no value is produced. So, per week, the total value produced is still only $50,000.
And finally, there are seven days in a full week, so $50,000 divided by 7 equals roughly $7,142.86. That's the total value of toys produced per day. Not "per work day", but "per day", as it specifically says in the problem.
But what does the teacher say as he guides us through it? 10 times 40 times 25 equals 10,000, so the answer is 10,000.
That's it. The end.
He even acknowledges: "So, you might be thinking, 'Hey wait, we didn't use all the information! We didn't use the "five days per week" information!' And yeah, as it turns out, that was information we didn't need."
'As it turns out'?! Are you kidding me right now?! I carefully read the question, precisely calculated exactly what it was asking for, taking all of the provided information into account... and now you're saying I'm supposed to have somehow magically known to ignore one of those pieces of information in order to make it easier for myself?
Just admit that your problem is worded badly, dude. UGH this kind of shit drives me crazy. Why can't people use words clearly >:(
#o hear my sad complaint#grump grump#cosmo gyres#actually autistic#i am too autistastic for this shit#what do you mean i'm expected to somehow intuit that i need to ignore one particular sentence in the original problem?!??
15 notes
·
View notes