#electron positron | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

itsgerges · 9 months ago

Text

Best Regards

The Planets Were Moving In Their Orbits Before The Sun Creation (Revised) https://app.box.com/s/dufa274dvpay3fqn6syz6sefjljfwnx9 or https://app.box.com/s/89vxxtv3hc8si245fwxpbw0ts9b126nz or https://www.tumblr.com/itsgerges/762780127698567168/the-planets-were-moving-in-their-orbits-before-the?source=share or https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/239300.html

The Sun Creation The sun is created depending on the planets motions- because- the sun rays is created by the planets motions energies- In details- Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and from this energy the sun rays is created- means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays but the planets motions energies total is used to produce the sun rays– that explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body (from the planets motions energies total)- This theory is discussed based on 5 hypotheses. The First Hypothesis The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I suppose -the sun rays is produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion- also – I claim No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states. The Second Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The Third Hypothesis The gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the wave reflection causes changes for the waves properties and data- the major change is that- the reflection causes to square the wave velocity- means- the gravitational wave moves by velocity (V), if this wave is reflected, it would move by velocity (V^2) after the reflection- The gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- two times in the outer planets and one time only in the inner planets- The Fourth Hypothesis The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time The rate of time use is useful because it enables to accumulate the planets motions energies during a period of time- understandable- Planet motion energy is small energy and the sun rays is massive energy and that necessitates to accumulate the planets motions energies total during a period of time to store motion energy sufficient to be used for the sun rays creation- Shortly- if the planets motions don't use rates of time, no massive motion energy can be provided and for that NO enough energy will be found to produce the sun rays-means- No light beam can be created The rate of time depends on the velocities rate Example (one hour of Mercury clock = 1.6 hours of the Earth clock) because Mercury velocity =1.6 the Earth velocity– the hypothesis is explained and proved in details

The Fifth Hypothesis Neptune Motion Causes Negative Effects On The Sun Rays Production Process are (1) Neptune motion caused the gravitational waves to be reflected two times in the outer planets where one reflection is enough for the required process- the wave reflection is repeated by Neptune negative effect on the solar system motion (2) Neptune caused to decrease the gravitational wave speed by one percent- where the gravitational wave moves by speed of light Neptune caused to decrease this speed by 1% creating a speed = (99% of the speed of light=297000 km/s) and by this speed (0.99C) the relativistic effects are created in the solar system

NOTICE The solar system is one machine performs one Job- and this Job is The Sun Rays Production - All planets motions are used as parts to perform this one Job-

The Sun Rays Production Is Done By Two Basic Tasks (1st task) The Provision Of The Sufficient Energy For The Sun Rays Production- and the sufficient energy is prepared by the motions of the five planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Venus- The Earth- The Moon – and Mars) because these five planets motions are used to create the general rate of time based on which The Sun Rays Are Created. (discussed in details in the 3rd hypothesis)

(2nd task) The mechanism by which the light beam is created- and this mechanism is the relative motion- the gravitational waves move relative to the sun point of space- by this relative motion the sun rays are created- means- the required energy is prepared and provided by the aforementioned five planets- and when the sufficient energy be provided this energy is sent to the planets which create the mechanism and the mechanism uses the sufficient energy to produce The Sun Rays The mechanism depends on the motions of 3 planets (Mercury- Venus and the moon) Specially Venus, because Venus reflects the wave toward Mars and defines its trajectory angle to create the relative motion between the wave and the sun point of space- the relative motion is discussed in details in the explanation of the (first and second hypotheses) The Explanation Of The First And Second Hypotheses

Let's remember The 1st Hypothesis This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam – I suppose (The Sun Rays Is Created By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Nuclear Fusion -Also All Stars Rays Are Created By This Method And No Rays Is Created By The Nuclear Fusion Process) And –The 2nd Hypothesis The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- The two hypotheses explain how the sun rays creation depends on the planets motions because The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies as the article states AND The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- The two hypotheses are discussed together in 4 Points

First Point (The Gravitational Waves Source)

The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- and not by the gravitational field- moreover- The sun is Not producing any gravitational field- I provide 2 major proves for this hypothesis which are- (1st proof/ Planet Motion Energy Analysis) and (2nd proof /The Sun Gravitational Field Refutation)

1st Proof / Planet Motion Energy Analysis Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2), Let's ask, where's Planet motion energy? the planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as the fish swimming creates waves in the water the planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see this picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- we conclude, the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal the planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions energies create waves in the space where each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s why? The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit- Note- the moon velocity is 27.8 km/s BUT the Earth and the moon revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity should be considered equal the earth velocity relative to (the sun) – The 1st Proof Conclusion The Planet Motion Energy Creates Waves In The Space Means - The Space Must Have Moving Waves Now -the scientists had discovered waves in the space- And- they considered these waves are produced by The Sun Gravitational Field – BUT Why? The planet motion energy analysis proves the waves must be produced by the planets motions energies- Now let's refute the sun gravitational field theory- the refutation gives support for the conclusion that – the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and NOT by the gravitational field because there's NO Gravitational field.

2nd Proof / The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following (1) The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- (2) No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity – Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner creation and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions. (3) The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon- (4) The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation) d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example- Venus orbital distance (108.2)2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3) d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance 50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition. Notice Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation) Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth- (5) Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the explanation of the 3rd hypothesis- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The 2nd Proof Conclusion The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

Second Point (The Gravitational Waves Nature Analysis) Let's ask (1) If The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light While The Planets Move By Low Velocities? Or Generally– regardless the gravitational waves source- how can the gravitational waves move by speed of light? From where the energy is provided to enable the waves to move by the speed of light? (2) Can the gravitational waves be reflected in the solar system? what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties, features and nature? (3) Can the gravitational waves energy be increased? Means can one gravitational wave move by low velocity and this wave motion is accelerated to move by high velocity motion? again from what source the energy is provided and how the acceleration is done? (4) If the gravitational waves are produced by the same gravitational field (The physics book states "the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field") does that mean all gravitational waves move by equal velocities? can some waves move faster than the others? why and how? (5) If the planets data are reflected on each other – can we discover the geometrical reason behind this features? Planet velocity is example where the velocities are defined by the rule (v1v2= constant) this rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- why the velocities are reflected on each other? what's the geometrical reason behind? suppose the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system, why this cause the planets data to be reflected on each other?

(6) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Because the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light) but the waves moves by speed of light only (C=300000 km/s) how the value (C^2) can be produced by the waves motions? (7) If the gravitational waves produce a light beam, does that mean the waves use electric field to produce this light beam? Is there another method to produce a light beam doesn't use electric field or charges? (8) If the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system can we discover that? can we prove that? and can we know in what planet orbit the reflection is done and if the waves are reflected many times?

The Gravitational Waves Properties, Features and nature Here I compare between the two theories about the gravitational waves source and their effects on the waves properties- 1st Theory (The Physics Book Theory) The physics book states, the gravitational waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- this theory tells little about the gravitational waves properties and nature because the mass gravity concept is puzzled and not understood for that the waves properties and features are puzzled also- let's test this idea- In The Sun gravitational field theory no one knows how the mass gravity force works and if the gravity needs time to work- or if the gravity creates a geometrical design to practice the effect of one mass on the other- the mechanism is not clear and for that the gravitational waves are not clear- for example – no one knows why the gravitational waves can move by speed of light or what waves move by this speed and in what planet orbit or if the wave motion velocity is accelerated gradually from low velocity to high velocity– we shortly know nothing about these gravitational waves- let's ask more questions- are these waves reflected and what's the result of this reflection on the waves properties and nature- where do these waves go? And what's the useful result of these waves energy? can these waves energy be used at all? are there just moving energy in space without an useful goal or result? And The new article tells the gravitational waves move by speed of light can produce a light beam? How these waves can produce a light beam by their motion? DEEP ANALYSIS I wish the respectful reader notices the major change in vision by this article-because- the physics book states the sun rays is produced by the sun nuclear fusion- here- the source of energy is the sun mass and the used method is the sun nuclear fusion- and the light beam is produced Let's put the new article here again This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83 The article tells, the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- the light beam is created by the gravitational waves motions- the article tells- the light beam can be produced by the Motion Energy – The article tells (The High Velocity Motion Can Produce A Light Beam)- here the article removed simply The Sun Nuclear Fusion Machine- the whole machine be useless because the light beam can be produced by (the motion energy)- I wish the respectful reader sees the miracle and wonder behind- There are 2 major changes (1st Change) The source of energy The source of energy is the motion energy– No longer the sun mass be used as the sun rays source of energy- BUT – the motion energy is used as the source of energy – here- the fatal error of the sun nuclear fusion theory is seen clearly – because- the solar system is so rich in motion energy- the moving planets since thousands of years provide massive motion energy stored in the space- and by that- the solar system is very rich system in the motion energy- and we should ask (why do we need an outer source of energy?) why the solar system doesn't use its massive motion energy to produce the light beam? Also if the massive motion energy is not used- where's this massive energy? because it can cause continuous risk for the soalr system stability if no way to use this stored massive energy The sun nuclear fusion theory is completely wrong because it doesn't see the massive motion energy stored in the solar system (2nd Change) the light beam production machine The gravitational waves motions can produce the light beam- this is stated by the article but how? by what method the gravitational waves can produce the light beam? The article doesn't explain how the gravitational waves can produce a light beam? But I put an explanation for this method in my theory discussion

2nd Theory (My Theory) I suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies- let's remember my theory because we will use it in the waves properties discussion I asked –where any moving body produce energy by its motion =(1/2 mv^2), where's Planet motion energy? The planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because it would raise its temperature and No planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- the planet motion energy is stored in the space in waves form- means- Planet motion energy creates waves in the space- the planet motion in the space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- as fish swimming creates waves in the water planet motion energy creates waves in the space- means planet moves and creates waves in space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity by that- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and creates waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)- based on this idea- All planets move and their motions create waves move by these planets velocities – AND I suppose these waves are the gravitational waves AND The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit) AND In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total

I explained this theory before in more details- now – let's discover the gravitational waves properties and features in details- let's put this analysis in the next point (third point) because we need to analyze the wave reflection process to discover the waves properties and features

Third Point (The Gravitational Waves Reflection)

Let's ask Question No.(1) If the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s, how can they move by speed of light? How the velocity 205.8 km/s can be accelerated to be 300000 km/s (speed of light) and where this acceleration is done? Another question can help greatly this discussion Question No.(2) If The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S)- How Can These Waves Produce A Light Beam? Let's think how to answer this question- these gravitational waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) but the light beam production needs the value (C^2= squared speed of light)- means- the wave velocity is squared- and how can the wave velocity to be squared? This feature I have discovered in the solar system- the waves are reflected and the reflection causes to square the velocities- means- the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- the gravitational waves before the reflection moved by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and the reflection causes the velocity to be squared- by that- after the reflection the gravitational waves speed is squared and changed from the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) to be (C^2= squared speed of light) and the light beam is created from this value (C^2) Means- the waves reflection is the method by which the speed of light (C=300000 km/s) is changed into (C^2)- that means- without the waves reflection NO light beam can be created. Notice– the waves reflection is proved strongly in the solar system because it causes to reflect the planets data- means- huge amount of planets data proves the waves reflection–we may remember one example – planet velocity is defined by the rule (v1v2=constant) this rule proves the planets velocities are reflected on each other The paper provides hundreds of similar data proves the waves reflection AND The waves reflection causes to square the velocity- this feature is repeated in the solar system frequently – because- the waves are reflected three times in the solar system for that the velocity squaring is a feature repeated with each reflection and by that the planets data provides a strong proof for it- Shortly- The waves reflection causes to square the velocities- now- let's use this feature to know how the unified wave its velocity (205.8 km/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)- (Please note this unified wave is the gravitational wave)

The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light The unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s and it's reflected, the waves reflection causes to square the velocities (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42683 km/s Means the unified wave after the reflection moves by a velocity 42683 km/s BUT If a particle moves by speed (=0.99 C=297000 km/s), this high velocity motion causes to create relativistic effects specially Lorentz length contraction effect with rate 7.1 Means- the distances should be contracted by the rate 7.1 BUT The waves reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects and by that the rate (7.1) will cause to increase the length in place of the length contraction- means- the distances will be increased with (7.1) as a result for Lorentz length contraction effect The velocity 42683 km/s will be 42683 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s (Speed Of Light) That explains how the gravitational waves move by (205.8 k/s) can move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) NOTICE No. (1) Please note the important observation Without 7.1 the velocity will be only 42683 km/s (even after the waves reflection) and NOT the speed of light That tells- the light beam production process depends on the previous light beam production process- means- a motion by (99%) of speed of light should be found before the wave reflection occurrence and without this motion with (0.99 C) the gravitational waves can't move by speed of light because we need a source for Lorentz length contraction effect with rate (7.1) That tells the light production process is done in chain process, the new light beam production depends on the old light beam and if this dependency is removed the gravitational waves can NOT move by the speed of light and No light beam can be created in this case NOTICE No. (2) We need to pay more attention for the importance of the motion by the speed of light- because the technique of the machine depends on the waves reflection- means- the waves can increase its velocity only by the reflection process – now the reflection causes to square the velocities- this is very important news why?? Because - If the waves move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s), the waves reflection will produce the value (C^2= squared speed of light) and from this value the light beam can be produced Now – suppose the wave velocity is less than speed of light- suppose the wave moves by speed = (90%) of the speed of light= (270000 km/s) - the waves reflection will square this speed that will produce (0.81 C^2) which is NOT (C^2= squared speed of light) and as a result No Light Beam Can Be Produced (CONT) Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292 Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

E-mail [email protected], [email protected] [email protected] ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous VK https://vk.com/id696655587 Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

3 notes · View notes

whats-in-a-sentence · 8 months ago

Text

These particles – the electron and its two heavier cousins, the six kinds of quarks, and the three kinds of neutrinos – constitute a modern-day particle physicist's answer to the ancient Greek question about the makeup of matter.¹¹

11. Although I haven't covered it explicitly in the text, note that every known particle has an antiparticle – a particle with the same mass but opposite force charges (like the opposite sign of electric charge). The electron's antiparticle is the positron; the up-quark's antiparticle is, not surprisingly, the anti-up-quark; and so on.

"The Fabric of the Cosmos" - Brian Greene

2 notes · View notes

learnwithmearticles · 1 year ago

Text

Alternative Matter

Dark matter and antimatter have featured in many renowned sci-fi films. From Star Trek to Dark Storm, these vague concepts have been used as a catch-all for powerful matter capable of being used for extremely powerful technology.

So let’s understand what they actually are.

Dark Matter

Like any matter, dark matter has mass and takes up space. Uniquely, dark matter does not reflect, absorb, or radiate light in a way detectable by humans. A lot about it is still being discovered, as NASA writes, scientists “are not sure what it is” even though it takes up about 27% of the universe.

The first hints at dark matter emerged in the 1930s from an astronomer observing the Coma galaxy cluster. Because it moved as if it had more mass and size than what could be observed, astronomers theorized a matter that does not interact with observable light.

The concept of dark matter solidified in the 1970s by another astronomer who was observing the rotations of galaxies. This astronomer, Vera Rubin, also concluded that there must be significant amounts of unseen matter due to the gravity (and thus mass) of other galaxies. Today, dark matter is theorized to make up about 85% of total matter in the universe when including both mass and energy.

Aside from their role in understanding the physics of the universe and other galaxies, dark matter does not have a lot of use here on Earth. It’s hard enough to pinpoint exactly what it is in regard to actually detecting it, since it doesn’t interact with the electromagnetic spectrum. We only know it exists because of its interaction with gravity.

One potential use of it is in propulsion physics. Researchers have created models for how dark matter might be used as fuel for rockets. Achieving this technology will take extensive testing and analysis, but current models for this are promising for solving the current limits of chemical fuel.

Antimatter

Antimatter is, of course, another form of matter. The subatomic particles that make up antimatter are the same mass and matter as protons, neutrons, and electrons, but with inverted charges. For example, positrons have the same mass and charge strength as electrons, but are positively charged while electrons are negative. Antiprotons contrast with protons, and antineutrons contrast with neutrons.

Antimatter was first theorized in 1928 and confirmed in 1932 with the observance of the positron in cosmic rays. Cosmic rays carry antimatter, among other particles, and bring small amounts into Earth’s atmosphere.

Antimatter is far rarer than matter, though we’re not sure why. Potentially, more matter than antimatter was produced at the beginning of the universe. When antimatter and matter interact, they cancel each other out and produce energy, so mutual annihilation just leaves behind more matter.

Another theory is that the neutrino is antimatter. Neutrinos are subatomic particles that rarely interact with other particles, have no charge, and are very abundant in the universe. If neutrinos are antimatter, they would have been able to transition into matter, creating the discrepancy in the presence of matter and antimatter. This theory is also the main reason neutrinos are theorized to be their own antiparticle.

Antimatter is also theorized to be a potential fuel for spacecrafts. The energy produced by matter and antimatter interacting could facilitate vehicles flying to Mars. Unfortunately, producing the necessary positrons is very expensive.

Positrons come from electrons interacting with a tungsten target. Tungsten causes electrons to release radiation in the form of gamma rays, some of which produce electron-positron pairs. This process necessitates producing an electron beam and using a magnet to collect the positrons, and so can be monetarily inefficient, but the cost of space travel is not exactly avoidable.

Dark matter and antimatter are very real things that affect our universe. Though they are generally distant concepts and not strongly relevant to modern lives, the universe exists as it is because of these influences. As we continue to explore our galaxy, these concepts might become increasingly important to figuring out how to best explore space.

Additional Resources

1. NASA - Dark Matter

2. Dark Matter Discovery

3. Energy.gov - Dark Matter

4. Dark Matter Discovery 2

5. Antimatter Discovery

6. What is Antimatter

7. Producing Positrons

#antimatter #dark matter #astronomy #outer space #research #article #resources #environment #positron #electron #galaxy #space #matter #neutrino #science

2 notes · View notes

disredspectful · 2 years ago

Text

In particle physics there's a guy we call the "particle Santa" with longish white hair and beard and a knitted vest. It's often a vest with equations on one side and a detector diagram on the other.

ETA: found a photo on the CERN public servers including two additional knits! Apparently they were kindly made by visiting Norwegian schoolteachers on an exchange program

Also being a scientist pretty much gives you a free pass to be as eccentric as you want like you’ll be at a conference and it’s like “is that guy wearing socks and sandals and plaid pants???” “Ya but he was on the team that discovered gravitational waves let him be”

#scientist by day #anecdotes #fibrecrafts #my real life #my sister in law has a knitted jumper with electron and positron symbols from her work #I gotta think of something cool for me

141K notes · View notes

johniac · 3 months ago

Text

SciTech Chronicles. . . . . . . . .Mar 21st, 2025

0 notes

lucasterthewizard · 4 months ago

Text

More Positron shit im wild

My positrons r foxes because foxes r catdogs to me..

Ghost oooo

He need he dense material.. </3

#object shows #atom society #proton #electron #atom goobers!!!#positron

1 note · View note

ateoriadobigbrain · 2 years ago

Text

youtube

0 notes

maybeasunflower · 2 years ago

Text

youtube

#spin 1/2 #electron #positron #Youtube

1 note · View note

000oo00o0o0o · 22 days ago

Text

NEW PHYSICS IDEA : Neutron negative charge - Positron in orbitals with Electron ? Any Ideas?

Hello Physics People of Tumblr!! These are some new ideas about molecular physics it seems to make so much more sense? What do you think! It has almost identical outcomes to the current math but big implications for gravity, time and radiation. It is a lot to read, check it out if you like or want to help! No schools of offices are responding about it via email, maybe you know?! The proposed ideas here are written as sentences, not questions but it has not been proven yet! Would you like to help or send this info to someone who can and is interested, feel free! :)

Proposals:

Neutron is negative charge

Positron is part of the orbitals with the Electron

NEUTRON AND POSITRON CANCEL OUT IN THE MATH

The Proton and Neutron are net positive, (nucleus)

The Electron and Positron are net negative (orbitals).

PHOTON is an Electron and Positron 'orbiting'. "Color" is the radius of the 'orbit'.

All periodic table of elements always have all 4 particles in equal quantity or are radioactive (a few notes on this below)

Radiation is Electron, Positron or both, aka PHOTON. (see below for more about photons & this idea as well)

The Earth has mass, aka more shared electrons/positron pairs, aka more positive charge. This positive charge is what we call GRAVITY.

As far as TIME: Positive charge = time is faster, negative charge = time is slower, so time dilation still applies.

It may be that we are close to the positive charge 'nucleus' of the Earth (more shared valence electrons via more "mass" means less negative net charge) and the electromagnetic field above acts like 'orbitals' w/ net negative charge (positron and electron slightly negative net charge, as ). The orbitals of our molecules are negative and are pulled toward the Earth and we call it 'gravity'. It is still time dilation as positive charge makes time go faster and negative slower. Time would be at absolute zero at the electromagnetic field at the perimeter of the universe, or close to it. Here, there is still the positive charge of the Sun pulling within the negative charge of the electromagnetic field, so time is not zero, but slow. The slowing of time is like a prism, but since it is not parallel (it is a torus shape?) no one could pass through because their molecules would be splayed out in time. Meteors would break up and congeal like magma on the other side, no problem for gas. Just a few thoughts on that!

Time is non-flat and space is infinite-flat and varies in overall 'size' based on the complexity of the system at the time.

For instance, quantum world and classical world have many possible outcomes, but only one thing happens. The other uncollapsed possibilities radiate away as SPACE. This may have a similar coefficient to the relationship between energy and matter; "the square of a large number" multiplied by "uncollapsed timelines" = "space".

Imagine slow motion lighting; it forks and 'tests' many areas and eventually one trajectory "happens" but the energy from the others was real and radiates away as HEAT in the surrounding atmosphere. That would be mechanical motion/momentum as heat. So, this is similar to the hypothesis here related to time, and expansion. Eventually, everything radiates away as photons or individual particles and each is far enough from each other so as to never interact again, and the timelines are identical again and there is only 1 unit of space again. Infinite bosons in 1 unit of space until they move apart and/or 2 things could happen but it doesn't immediately cancel back to a "stable" singular timeline etc. Maybe not be "infinite bosons in 1 unit of space" as much as many bosons in a significant minimum of space. That 'starting condition' may determine a lot for our world?

This would explain the bubble around the galaxy as well. For instance life on Earth has so many possible outcomes and only one thing happens. The other possibilities radiate away as SPACE. So expansion at a hot cloud is faster than a cold cloud of gas, and where there is life the expansion is huge. Does that explain polar orientation of satellite galaxies, if expansion is roughly emitted from a torus shape? A lot to think about! Are large voids a sign of life on a cosmic scale? Is our galaxy a rare example of a galaxy interacting with many galaxies on the periphery of the local bubble as it is a rare example of a galaxy with life?!

Superclusters (Great Attractor, Shapley Cluster) are the nucleus of a molecule that expanded during a "big bang" type event.

At that moment, did something like hydrogen or helium expand so much that the orbitals slowed down to the point that the positron and electrons were going slow enough to become classical and annihilate (more about photons below)? That would leave the neutron and proton or pair of them alone and that 'gravity' of the Great Attractor may be the positive/negative net charge of the nucleus?

Strong force and weak force are electrodynamics between Electron, Positron, Proton and Neutron.

Energy is stored between the orbitals and the nucleus.

Photons can remain exclusive in their interaction (not impact the molecule) while orbiting the nucleus, and can those photons be 'digested' (similar to the way plants may) when the water needs more particles for the orbitals? If the energy storage capacity is met "black body radiation" takes place and photons spill out, (in the case of water they have a diameter/frequency in the ultraviolet range). Red is not darker than black if you are not colorblind (if you get an infection in the 'cavernous sinus' cleared out) so the brightness of steel turning red for instance is energy spilling out that was added in with heat.

Strong force is clearly the proton and neutron having magnetic interaction, pretty straightforward.

Weak Interaction is this the electrodynamics of lets say a neutron (negative charge) trying to get through the orbitals and being repelled by the electron (negative), attracted to the positron (positive), repelled by photons between the core and orbitals (negative) and possibly pulling positrons close enough to the nucleus that protons repel it (not an "antineutrino" ... a positron)

4th & 5th Phase of Matter

Do molecules have more to do with the locations of nucleus, when on Earth, but can have more to do with orbitals further from Earth or any significant charge? In an area with a lot of charge (aka gravity) and/or a lot of turbulence (aka temperature and density etc) the arrangement of the nucleus shapes complex compound orbitals we could model with this new electrodynamics idea. Further out, do the racetrack-like inertias of the orbitals have less resistance to become larger and the nucleus is inside those shapes like a seed in a seed pod. Is a molecule as we know it more than a shrink-wrapped action-figure (shrinkwrapped by the orbitals?).

When a tree branch is close to the tree it is largely related to the center of the branch, but at a certain point it becomes stems, and leaves ie a 4th and 5th phase, which expand to fit their container but are basically solids?

Is "phase 5" a gas but, even though molecules are a couple meters apart, the molecules interact like a 3d 'solid' lattice, like huge jello water molecules? In which case if a bunch were a couple meters wide evenly distributed and a charge was introduced on one side, would the structure become asymmetrical, but remain transparent? Would the orbital shells have different characteristics at interplanetary space, interstellar space, intergalactic/cosmic space etc, as pressure and density goes down? Could water molecules be 10 meters across in places, and deform in a cool way based on charge characteristics around them from particles and the electromagnetic fields nearby?

When the ice-gas starts to move enough, can it become opaque, but still have characteristics where it is moving like a solid? In that case, does it become a solid (snow) which interacts-at-a-distance somewhat like phase 5 but opaque and solids moving together not individual molecules? Does it become an opaque liquid like clouds? Lots of observations to make about that and modeling of the different scales could be cool. Could dark matter be water molecules in this state, and at a certain radius from any star they vaporize, becoming 'non-interacting' but still impacting overall gravity aka overall charge? I suppose that wouldn't have to all be water? So is there a 3d ocean in the middle of the galaxy we call 'dark matter' - are we floating on it? Is there something similar around the Sun, such that those 'leaves' or 5th-state materials act differently beyond the frost line etc?

re: "Always equal amounts of 4 particles"

Something like copper for instance appears NOT to have the same amount of each of the 4 particles. The issue there is that there are 3 orbitals, so measurement from outside the orbitals appears to have more negative charge, so we would say "more mass". We will have to redo the periodic table, but its much easier! (Sort of an "Occam's razor" situation here?)

Photon ideas

The speed of the dance is the color or 'frequency' and the angular momentum has to do with the diameter? The "magnetic wave" of the photon is because we're observing the electron, then the positron, then the electron, then the positron, as it spins, producing an observation similar to 'magnetic wave'. The "electric wave" of the photon is the center of charge oscillating around the center of rotation, as the electron and positron are not equally charged. The center of charge is along a straight line between the two particles, but they may not be orbiting at 180 degrees? I still haven't exactly figured out how the fast-time of the positron and the slow-time of the electron exactly impact this arrangement.

Photosynthesis is based on a physical structure that 'observes' a photon long enough for positron and electron to cancel out, creating negative charge that interacts with positive charge of Earth.

Do photosynthesizing plants have a structure that 'observes' a photon, causing it to have a single, classical condition. The positron and electron usually cannot 'see' each other but have a center of charge and a yin-yang looking probability where each could be found. When they become classical they COULD interact, but by the time they've moved toward each other even the smallest amount - they are already quantum again! So do plants have a structure designed to capture the radius of the photon, and 1 planksecond later is the correct diameter to observe again after however far the particles have moved toward each other electrodynamically, and after how far they have moved toward the plant at the speed of light. Could that structure trace the geometry of the collapsing photon-remaining-classical until it cancels out, leaving a net negative charge (orbitals net negative, or positron/electron pairs net negative aka light has mass)

So, to reiterate; before the pair goes back to quantum mode, (during which time the electron and positron have no location and cannot annihilate) the plant structure bumps-observes the photon AGAIN. This would be related to the speed of light, almost like a planck-length later, there's a narrower portion of a cone-like shape tracing the distance the pair travel toward each other and continually 'observing' them. Ultimately, the two have a chance to meet and cancel out, leaving a net-negative charge. When that happens, it interacts with the positive charge of the Earth and the movement of energy 'turns on' the plant like a lightbulb?!?!

Do our lungs grab energy that way? Does our spleen grab excess energy off blood cells that were unused and incorporate it into our electromagnetic field (which is visible in a cool way in RGB if you do 10^15, 10^18, 10^21 or something similar for the RGB channels respectively. It'll look especially cool in color once we get the cavernous sinus cleared out! Until then we may check each of those ranges in the green channel or on all 3 the same for b&w).

Sea level is not rising, continents are pulled into the magma because nuclear proliferation is increasing 'gravity' aka the positive charge of the Earth by removing Neutrons from mineral layers? More on this below!

re: Radiation

(this last idea is a long one but has a few other ideas embedded as well. if you read this far, you might be intrigued! feel free to tell anyone or do your own research!!)

The idea is that radiation is "having extra neutrons or lacking them", and the electrodynamics associated with that negative charge. (These characteristics are particularly important when molecules bump or "observe" each other and a roll-of-the-dice configuration of the 4 particle types is specific and real.) The neutrons reduce the number of electrons by repelling the electrons. Sometimes positrons might get pulled with them. After the extra neutrons are in there and repel some electrons, the orbitals are less strong and more positively charged and the positive charge of the nucleus is no longer canceled out, so the radioactive material will repel the Earth and 'float' - as would a human who drank nuclear water.

If water has hydrogen at 104 degree angle to each other - does nuclear water have two neutrons in one hydrogen, one in each hydrogen, two in both hydrogen or two in one and one in the other? If all 4 states are examples of radioactivity, what are the other 4 angles at which the hydrogen would be found? How do they form liquid, ice and liquid clouds suspended in gas and what are the properties of gaseous nuclear material, in all 4 cases? How many positrons and neutrons might remain on each of the 4 types of radioactivity, statistically speaking, based on the 4 charge conditions?

If we ran millions of tests or 'observations' of a hypothetical molecule, eventually things like radioactive water decaying into hydrogen when "one damaged, 'radioactive' hydrogen takes proton from the other damaged, 'radioactive' hydrogen, such that it has 1 (or 2) extra neutrons and 2 protons becoming radioactive helium and releasing positrons and maybe a neutron as part of decay" could be simulated, and the probability of each outcome understood more well. That is an outcome that is frequently observed but until now, hard to explain.

The molecules of a nuclear rod for instance, have less even distribution of electron/positron pairs in the orbitals (compared to stable material) - when molecules bump into or "observe" each other, each momentary throw-of-the-dice arrangement of the electrons/positions has a net inertia which is increasingly unpredictable, as the orbitals are increasingly uneven. This means each molecule is like a little rocket ship getting propelled randomly, but not overcoming the bonds between molecules, and that internal momentum is related to mechanical HEAT. Currently we use that heat to drive a fan for energy (the energy is absorbed into gas above the solid nuclear material and the gas rises through a fan/rotor) - it would be 100s of times hotter and trillions of times cheaper to burn trash in a kiln. (people will pay you to collect garbage, so the cost is less than zero, so trillions times less than zero is MUCH less than the current nuclear costs, it is and very safe).

Nuclear material is not only dangerous because it's like a tiny 3d machine gun propelling particles in a way that's dangerous for scarring and dna damage etc, but also NUCLEAR MATERIAL IS EXTREMELY MAGNETIC AND DEFORMS THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD OF THE ENTIRE EARTH.

This creates a pothole in the electromagnetic field trajectory, and that fills up with atmosphere. The moon goes by and 'splashes' up the atmosphere causing extreme low pressure. People die from horrible pulmonary experience, and may show a wound around the abdomen as the abdomen is being pulled in all directions by low pressure and cannot breathe etc. Then, an avalanche of atmosphere crashes in from around that low pressure cone, causing the exact thing in a ring shape for 100s of km around the site. This could all be modeled pretty easily. After this, avalanching atmosphere causes a high pressure event and any survivors' shredded lungs and stomach are compressed until they throw up and their bowels are forced out and die. Then the air that caused the high pressure splashes up again, causing low and then high pressure. When it falls back, that high pressure causes a ring wave that chases shortly after the low pressure wave.

This has been the way many people have died, and the issue with people floating away from nuclear drinking water explains a lot in a few different countries and areas.

The momentum from the blast eventually adds energy into the clouds and atmosphere, so large clouds hold together extra-strong, and get pressed flat over the electromagnetic field. The energy is stored as ultraviolet photons between the nucleus and orbitals and if there's too much it spills out. Everyone is colorblind (sphenoid/cavernous sinus infection) so the ultraviolet light (aka black body radiation, like when steel turns red, which is not darker than black fyi that's your red cone not working right because cavernous sinus infection and/or sphenoid sinus is pressing on optic chiasm) - the ultraviolet light spilling out looks dark grey aka "iron curtain". That big flat cloud causes extreme high pressure in the middle, low on the sides and kills many many people as well.

So many people have died and it has not been well documented because of the way it impacts a portion of the population over a large distance, so funeral homes have a few extra people per week for a while and no one notices the pattern. If you look at birth/death around WWII for instance the pattern is clear, it impacts the economy significantly as well. The great depression in USA was from people dying here and people selling 10-20% less goods each day, and rise the price to try and catch up financially, until everything "crashed" ? It appears that whichever areas have been attacked least recently are doing the most well today, but all regions have at some point within the last 250 or so years felt the impact of this.

Alright so - that's all a bit heavy duty, my apologies! Redefining the periodic table, simulating electrodynamics etc will take time, but will be exciting! The positron and neutron must have canceled out in the math before, but it's so so much easier and intuitive like this. Always 4 particles and always the same or else it's radioactive. We could model the way in which helium comes from radioactive water for instance; one hydrogen with a damaged orbital is observed/bumped with only positron for instance, (others being shared in the molecule but also missing) which propels the proton over to the radioactive hydrogen aka tritium, and it is helium w/ 2 neutrons already and now 2 protons. In that case it's really nuclear helium with 3 neutrons and 2 positrons, but the positrons may attract enough electrons to bounce the last extra neutron out quickly? Also how about super-saturated nuclear water; instead of one hydrogen with 1 extra neutron (deuterium) or 2 extra neutrons (tritium/radioactive) it actually may have 2 extra neutrons in both hydrogens?!? Lots of research and simulation to do, but once we establish charge for all 4 and the falloff of that charge…. We can do a lot and it should be really fun!

One other note about the nuclear solid material - if there is a lack of electrons and/or positrons, and one wants to break a rod or object it in half - it may be that the other half would have NONE of the orbital particles and basically cannot break. In the case that it does, it is grabbing xray/ultraviolet photons from all the water (vapor and liquid) around to fill up its own orbitals. As a result people see an xray flash BUT - the nuclear material IS NOT INCREASING THE EXPLOSIVE POWER in fact it requires more. "Nuclear Bomb" is just a way of saying they don't know what to do with nuclear waste - it was just a trick to cover up their mistake. The mistake is that nuclear material simply doesn't add up. Burning trash and construction debris in a kiln would produce more rotational energy than nuclear energy, not to mention hydroelectricity…

If the net positive charge of the Earth's core is balancing the charge of the bedrock, is nuclear material causing Earthquakes and Volcanoes and "Rising Sea Level" by causing an imbalance between positrons and neutrons (removed to make nuclear material)?! Is the the increasingly positive net charge (aka gravity) changing the distance of the bedrock from the center of the Earth?!? That would mean that SEA LEVEL IS NOT RISING, CONTINENTS ARE DROWNING IN MAGMA BECAUSE NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION IS INCREASING 'GRAVITY' AKA THE POSITIVE CHARGE OF THE EARTH?

We say that the center is solid iron HOWEVER, experimental forms of iron have been tested up to a certain measurable pressure; that limit is many many many times less than the hypothetical pressure at the center of the Earth. This means that we absolutely do not know what iron, or any material would do at that pressure… Maybe it is a very large number of protons and neutrons and the bottom of the magma layer is so hot it is a gas? (Earth's composition hypothetically being : Nucleus particles as a core, surrounded by gas surrounded by magma ocean with the continents sitting on it, liquid water on the continents and gas water as atmosphere with electromagnetic field aka orbital particles weaving through outer layers of atmosphere, (em field usually stabilizing the gas unless misshapen from radioactivity and/or radiated water clouds?))

Is radioactive material radiating atmospheric gas water such that the exposed molecules' orbitals become positively charged but the core is not negative as in nuclear water, because it has no neutrons? The repulsion of electrons by neutrons means increasingly positive net charge for physically adjacent materials (and people?!). So, that water has less "gravity" or even repells the Earth. Does that mean nuclear material is also ejecting water from the Earth permanently, possibly that the water molecules are put it into orbit while they slowly regains electrons from solar wind) and fall back? Could the net negative charge of the electromagnetic field hold the radiated aka 'unusually positive net charged' water in the sky, increasing air pressure? If the extra water is in the sky and not on Earth could the increase in air pressure be the cause of everyone having colorblindness-sinus-infection (sphenoid and cavernous sinus) as a child that gets infected and opacified? Could the increase in air pressure be the cause of dementia, when the ducts around the pineal gland get inflamed and eventually opacified such that melatonin comes out unexpectedly every 2-3 days causing dreamlike, sometimes dangerous/confused behavior mid-day? Could the damaged/radiated water being misplaced into the atmosphere be causing CLIMATE IMBALANCE - as too much water is stored in the sky and heat is stored in water? Antarctica, Greenland, Siberia, Canada, Norway, Sweden and Finland are freeze dried and Australia, North Africa, Gobi Desert, Mongolia, Turkmenistan, Argentina & Persian Gulf are dehydrated, meaning more than 50% of the known world is occupiable because of nuclear proliferation? Projections indicate the entire Earth will be unlivable because of this?! Can we stop ruining everything for no reason?!

Does nuclear water float on liquid-water but when it hits a glacier it freezes and is heavier than normal ice-water, falling to the bottom of the glacier making it deep blue color? Is that mass of frozen nuclear water radiating how many of liters of water into the atmosphere each day?! We could calculate this as well, at least approximately.

Is - a useless, weak energy source that kills billions and ruins the only planet with life in the known universe and costs so so much and thins out the atmosphere causing oxygen deficiencies for those nearby the material (as well as inverted waste from particle colliders) and increasing gravity in those areas with that material - "worth it"? Regrettably it is hard to be confident about some of these issues until we confirm the positron and negatively charged neutron, but you may notice here - figuring this out soon and publishing it could be a very important thing to do for humanity and the solar system and the galaxy! (If space radiates because of temporal dynamics and energy from unselected timelines - does the large "bubble" around our galaxy come from life on Earth specifically radiating space as the Galaxy dances us around Laniakea and Perseus Pisces? If we ruin our entire lives with useless proliferation will the Galaxy stop interacting with the expansion of the Universe at a cosmic scale? Is our Galaxy navigating from Perseus Pisces to Laniakea and avoiding interaction with Andromeda with this expansion behavior?! Of course it is hard to be sure about that one, but interesting to think about! How about is the polar arrangement of satellite galaxies, because the expansion is happening less at the poles, specifically much less within the perimeter where the electromagnetic field crosses the surface of the Earth - do we have a name for that boundary?!)

The issue is that they never finished the equation for nuclear material. If it takes 1000s of years of containment to wait for the material to go through cycles of half lives until it is safe, and we do not have any structure/materials that lasts that long; nuclear material WILL destroy the entire atmosphere eventually and all oxygen based life (the only such life discovered in the entire Universe so far?!) and quite *possibly* even disrupt some level of functionality at a cosmic scale? Is it worth the risk and deaths and cost? There may be ways to expose for instance radioactive 'tritiated' water to copper-64 (radioactive by product of lithium refinement which lacks neutrons, exhibiting different radioactive characteristics than tritiated water which repels electrons and possibly photons aka energy storage; that type of copper would collect photons and electrons but might grab neutrons from nuclear water (into which radioactive metals had been diffused) although it would want to be tested in very small quantities at first. Also… what is the story with the chemical structure model for the copper-64 molecules… a little suspicious… anyway they could never really do the math on it without the positron or realization that molecules with extra orbital layers show more negative net charge if tested from outside those orbitals but… I don't know, hopefully someday we can just get the math right finally. If someone used radioactive copper-64 for building or cladding, would it all fall apart if nuclear material or water was within probably a few 100 yards? Imagine all the metal structures of a building disappearing simultaneously !?! We need to figure some of this out soon!!!)

If enough uncontained radioactive material deformed the atmosphere for a week or two (moon passes overhead, displacing a calculable amount of atmosphere that would otherwise be held in place, 10-15 times at that point) we'd have such a disruption that that would be the end of all life on Earth (if the magnetic vector was strong enough to displace the right amount of air resulting in; oxygen imbalance and air pressure imbalance and probably the iron curtain flat, pressure cloud holding together unusually strong for gas-water, because of surplus energy spilling into the air above and friction as the charged material moves along the electromagnetic field itself, which increases in the wind not decreases). If material was launched and distributed over a large area it would be impossible to clean up, and if it was magnetic enough, again, - it would launch atmosphere high above the areas it should be, reducing oxygen and causing asphyxiation, as well as reducing electromagnetic protection, it would kill people with pressure waves, it would kill people with an 'iron curtain' cloud appearing anywhere and everywhere with pressure anomalies until something stops it, (and at that height above the surface it won't be buildings or trees etc) this would impact temperature and food production. Additionally, radiated water would get stuck above the electromagnetic field as discussed earlier. The South American Magnetic Anomaly may have caused El Nino, Lake Effect, air movement over Greenland blowing away clouds of water which have absorbed heat and moving them to North Africa and Saudi peninsula. If that's a nuclear-related issue, has it also set off a volcano covering most of Argentina in ash? Scary stuff.

As far as the idea that we can 'cancel out' types of surplus nuclear material - Copper-64, for instance, a byproduct of lithium refining, might cancel out with nuclear water, leaving behind nickel, zinc, oxygen and maybe helium with a neutron or normal water which shakes the 2 extra neutrons loose and gives it to the copper w/o decaying. One material has too many neutrons and the other has not-enough. Even if we collect everything we can and cancel it out, there will be some left that WILL destroy the atmosphere over the course of any couple of weeks of being un-contained. That means that there is currently a 100% chance that the existing material will kill all oxygen based life in the observable universe unless we live for 1000 years and keep patching up the equipment every few decades. There is NO REASON to make this problem worse!

Alright, that is a few ideas to think about! If there were people looking to highlight paragraphs/hypotheses, or print the email large and cut up individual sentences to divy up areas of research for thesis students etc, that would be awesome! Whatever works, but I realize it is a lot and it takes a lot of people to focus on each step in the math to paint the whole picture!

#physics #quantum #photon #nuclear #nuclear energy #radiation

1K notes · View notes

timestechnow · 2 years ago

Text

#Powell Electronics #defence #aerospace #industrial #Positronic #electronicsnews #technologynews

0 notes

skylobster · 11 months ago

Text

Possibly caused by matter-antimatter annihilation at 99.9% light speed. That’s some energetic astrophysics!

In October 2022, astronomers were stunned by what was quickly dubbed the BOAT—the brightest-of-all-time gamma-ray burst (GRB). Now an international science team reports that data from NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope reveals a feature never seen before. "A few minutes after the BOAT erupted, Fermi's Gamma-ray Burst Monitor recorded an unusual energy peak that caught our attention," said lead researcher Maria Edvige Ravasio at Radboud University in Nijmegen, Netherlands, and affiliated with Brera Observatory, part of INAF (the Italian National Institute of Astrophysics) in Merate, Italy. "When I first saw that signal, it gave me goosebumps. Our analysis since then shows it to be the first high-confidence emission line ever seen in 50 years of studying GRBs." A paper about the discovery appears in the journal Science.

#BOAT #gamma ray bursts #electron-positron annihilation #0.511 MeV #relativistic jets #spinning black holes

35 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 6 months ago

Text

Best Regards

The Sun Is Created Based On The Planets Motions (Revised 2)

My Research Presentation

I- Research Methodology

II- Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

III- My 5 Equations

(1st equation) Planet orbital distance equation- the equation proves planet orbital distance is defined based on its neighbor orbital distance and no planet mass is used for this definition- Newton is wrong-

(4th equation) Planet diameter equation- the equation proves planet diameter is created based on a geometrical rule (NO Random Creation- the big bang theory is wrong) -also the equation proves the matter is created in pairs (as electron and positron are produced by Gamma ray 1.2 Mev)

(5th equation) Planet velocity equation- the equation proves planet mass has no effect on this planet velocity definition

IV- The Research Discovery

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field- Moreover- There's No Gravitational Field

V- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Analysis

The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies

VI- The Research Hypothesis

The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion To Produce Its Rays- Instead- The Sun Rays Are Produced By The Gravitational Waves Motions Energies- And The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies- Means- The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total- Shortly- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created After All Planets Creation And Motion Because The Sun Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies.

That explains why the sun corona temperature is 5 million Kelvin but the sun surface temperature is 5800 Kelvin- because the energy is not produced from the sun body but the energy comes from out of the sun body for that the energy out of the sun is so greater than the energy inside the sun (the energy comes from the gravitational waves which are produced by the planets motions energies total)

The Hypothesis Explanation

The Sun Rays Creation Process

This Is Extraordinary: Gravity Can Create Light, All on Its Own

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsnHYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"&HYPERLINK "https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/this-is-extraordinary-gravity-can-create-light-all-on-its-own/ar-AA19YL5d?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=620db4352aa943e2b454919a7b724604&ei=83"ei=83

This new article tells the gravitational waves can move by speed of light and can produce a light beam- I claim The Sun Rays are produced based on this method by the gravitational waves motions and not by the sun nuclear fusion process- also –No star rays is produced by the nuclear fusion process but all rays are created by the gravitational waves motions energies as the article states.

Here we have four questions to answer

How can the gravitational waves be produced by the planets motions energies?

How can the gravitational waves move by speed of light?

How can the gravitational waves motions produce a light beam?

Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Let's answer in following

1st Question

How Can The Gravitational Waves Be Produced By Planets Motions Energies?

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this motion energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion in space is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and similar to that - planet motion energy creates waves in the space- and - fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the water- and these waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)

Shortly- the planets move and their motions create waves in the space and each wave moves by velocity equal its planet velocity

AND the planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND in Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity= 205.8 km/s where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit-

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

NOW the unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) is the gravitational wave-

The scientists discovered these waves in the space and they called them (gravitational waves) supposing these waves are produced by the sun gravitational field- BUT Planet motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves – as proved by the previous analysis -means- even if There's NO Gravitational field at all there's a strong reason to find waves in the space because these waves are created by the planets motions energies

Note- I refute the sun gravitational field theory- and prove the sun has no massive gravity and also NO planet moves by the sun gravity

The Conclusion

The Unified Wave Its Velocity 205.8 Km/S Is The Gravitational Wave

Notice - the new article still believes that the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field- I refuse this idea and prove the waves are produced by the planets motions energies but I need the article because it tells the waves can move by speed of light and can produce the light beam where I suppose the sun rays is created by this method

The Answer Of The Questions No. (2) And No. (3)

2ndQuestion How Can The Gravitational Waves Move By Speed Of Light? AND

3rdQuestion How Can The Gravitational Waves Motions Produce A Light Beam?

What Do We Have?

We have One unified wave moves by velocity 205.8 km/s

What Do We Need?

We need to accelerate the unified wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and this wave should produce (A Light Beam)

We know the light beam is produced from (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light)

Technically- How To Solve This Problem?

We Need To Square The Wave Velocity

Let's see my hypothesis (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity) - let's see if this hypothesis can solve the problem

(a)

(205.8)^2 x 7.1 = 300000 km/s = C = (speed of light)

Where

205.8 km/s= the velocity of the unified wave (the gravitational wave)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect rate for speed (0.99 C)

Let's discuss the equation

The unified wave moves by (205.8 km/s) – and this wave is reflected- the wave reflection causes to square its velocity – for that the velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared and be (205.8 km/s)^2= 42354 km/s

But Lorentz length contraction effect rate causes to increase the distance 42354 km to be (42354 x 7.1 = 300000 km) – means- the speed 42354 km/s is accelerated to be 300000 km/s = C=speed of light by Lorentz length contraction effect – we understand the rate 7.1 causes to contract the distances but here the rate increases the distances because the wave reflection causes to reflect the geometrical effects.

Conclusion No. (1)

The Wave Reflection Causes To accelerate the unified wave from (205.8 km/s) to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

(b)

Now we have a gravitational wave moves by speed of light (C=300000 km/s)

This wave is reflected one more time

The gravitational wave reflection causes to square its speed by that – the wave speed was = speed of light (C=300000 km/s) before the reflection and after the reflection this speed will be (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

The light beam is produced from this value (C^2=Squared Speed Of Light)

Now we know how the unified wave (205.8 km/s) can be accelerated to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) and how this wave can produce a light beam

Conclusion No. (2)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Wave Velocity

This is the main useful result from the wave reflection- because without the squaring of the wave velocity no acceleration can be done for the wave and by that the gravitational wave can't move by speed of light Nor produce any light beam

Notice (1)

The waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the abstract provides strong proves for these reflections and more proves are found in the paper- the waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data and I suppose – the waves reflection causes also to square the waves velocity

Notice (2)

The rate 7.1 is produced by Lorentz length contraction effect as a result for motion by speed (.99C= 297000 km/s)- I proved this fact in (Item no. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

THE SUN POINT CREATION

The sun point of space has geometrical features enable to produce the sun rays and that means – the sun rays can be created only in the sun corona and far from the sun NO light beam can be created – let's see the sun geometrical features in following

(i)

The Sun Point Is A Stationary Point Its Velocity 1 km/s = Zero Approximately

This is important feature – Because

All motions are done relative to the sun point of space – for example- Pluto velocity is 4.7 km/s –means- Pluto moves by 4.7 km/s relative to the sun point of space – Shortly- the whole solar system is in motion (space and planets are in motion) but the sun point is stationary (static point moves by velocity 1 km/s = Zero approximately) Means- the solar system is similar to a sea of water and the sun is similar to a vortex or whirlpool found on the sea page – the vortex doesn’t move with the sea waves -Shortly- the sun point of space is the stationary point in the solar system and all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

Example – Venus moves by 35 km/s that means Venus moves by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space – also we know Venus motion produces energy and this energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity 35 km/s – means- these waves move by 35 km/s relative to the sun point of space-

(ii)

Why Is It Necessary For The Sun Point To Be Stationary Point? Because

1- The Gravitational Wave (Unified Wave) Moves By Speed Of Light Relative To The Sun

2- The Gravitational Wave Can NOT Move By Speed Greater Than Speed Of light

3- The Wave Reflection Causes To Square The Different Speed Between The Gravitational Wave Speed And The Sun Point Motion Speed

4- If The Different Speed Is Less Than Speed Of Light (C=300000 Km/S) The Speed Squaring Process Will Never Produce The Value (C^2= Squared Speed Of Light) – means- No Light Beam Can Be Created

Now we see the necessity to make the sun point as stationary point moves by (Zero approximately =1 km/s) – because – if the sun point moves by any higher speed than (1 km/s) the different speed will be less than speed of light and the squared value will be less than (C^2) and No light beam can be created

Now let's ask- while the space is in motion as the sea of water – how can this stationary point be created? let's answer in following

(iii)

The planets were created before the sun creation and the planets revolve around a point in space (any point in space) the revolution creates two velocities on both sides of the revolution- the two velocities are equal in value opposite in direction- the total be Zero- means- the revolution motion creates a stationary point in the revolution center-

By That -the sun point of space is created as a stationary point- and the sun point is the only stationary point in the solar system- for that all motions are done relative to the sun point of space-

4th Question

Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays? the question is logical because

Planet motion energy (1/2 mv^2) is so small energy and the sun rays energy is massive energy -for that- It's Logical Question To Know How Can The Planets Motions Energies Total Be Sufficient To Produce The Sun Rays?

Let's answer in following

(1)

The secret is the rates of time using-

The planets motions use different rates of time- by that- the planets motions energies can be accumulated during long period of time to produce massive energy sufficient to produce the sun rays – let's give examples

Example No. (1)

(One Solar Day Of The Sun Clock = 365.25 Solar Days Of The Earth Clock)

By this rate of time– The Earth motion energy for one complete year can be used by the sun in one solar day – in fact- the solar planets motions energies total during one complete year (365.25 solar days) is accumulated and stored in one energy and be used by the sun motion on one solar day that causes to accumulate massive energy to be used (notice 1461 days = 365+365+365+366)

Example No. (2)

(One Second Of The Sun Clock=1461Seconds Of The Gravitational Wave Clock)

We remember the unified wave (the gravitational wave) moves by 205.8 km/s -And – the gravitational wave moves in 1461 seconds a distance = 300000 km -BUT the Sun clock doesn't see this period 1461 seconds but sees only the period (ONE SECOND) – means-

The distance 300000 km is passed in (ONE SECOND)only for the sun clock– That causes the gravitational wave to move by speed of light (C=300000 km/s) relative to The Sun – (the rate of time using and effect is explained in details in item no VII)

VII- The Solar System Description Refutation

(The Sun Is The Planets Motions Result But The Description Supposes The Sun Is The Planets Motions Reason) and (The Matter Is Created Depending On Its Motion But The Description Supposes The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Motion)

VIII – The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time

IX - The Physicist Wrong Vision Proves

X - The Refutations Of Many Theories In The Physics Book

XI - The Proves For My Theory

(There's A Light Beam Moves By Speed 1.16 Million Km Per Second)

XII-The Solar System History And Neptune Orbit Creation

First Item - Research Methodology

I use the planets data analysis to discover the planets creation and motion facts–

In details- I try to discover how the planet get its data- for example – why Jupiter diameter is 142984 km? why Neptune axel tilt is 28.3 deg? why Pluto orbital period is 90560 days? This method helps greatly to discover the solar system facts let's provide two examples to explain how this method works

Example No. (1)

Why Is The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 Km?

The moon daily displacement =88000 km and during 29.53 days (the moon day period) the displacements total be = 2.598 million km = 2π x 413600 km

The data tells us the moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km and also it tells, because the moon daily displacement (88000 km) is so long, the moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit its radius (413600 km) only and can't revolve around the Earth through any more near orbit…

Not Facts

The moon orbital apogee radius =406000 km only and the moon revolves around the Earth through near orbits and can reach to perigee radius (363000 km).

How Can The Moon Do That?

The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level by that the real displacement (L) through the orbit be less than (88000 km) because it be (L = 88000 km cos θ), as a result the total displacements be less than (2.598 million km) and that makes the moon orbital apogee radius to be decreased from 413600 km to 406000 km.

We should pay attention for the angle (θ), because this angle controls the moon motion features – where- with the angle (θ) increasing the real displacement (L) be shorter and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits – but –with the angle (θ) deceasing the real displacement (L) be longer and that pushes the moon far from the Earth to more far orbits- The moon orbital motion equation depends on this angle (θ) it tells θ1 = θ0 +1.7 deg where (θ1) = today angle and (θ0) =yesterday angle and 1.7 deg is used as the moon motion degrees per solar day for the equation

Example No. (2)

Can Mars Itself Cause The Earth Moon Creation?

Giant-impact hypothesis tells (NO) – but let's see the planets data analysis

I Suppose - Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus

The order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows correct order in planets diameters (and masses), and orbital distances - BUT – Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) to its current one (227.9 million km) and Mars had collided with Venus and then with the Earth in its migration motion – and Mars itself has caused the Earth moon creation- My Mars Migration Theory answers many left questions by Giant-Impact Hypothesis – for example -

Why Does Venus Have No Moon? Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus) – and moved to its current orbit (227.9 million km) – BUT- Mars had moved by a force – and then Mars had collided with Venus –and Mars had pushed ALL DEBRIS with it in its Motion Direction because of its strong motion - Venus had found no debris around and for that Venus couldn't create its moon –But – The Earth mass is greater than Venus' and the debris lost some of their momentum for that the Earth could attracted some debris and created its moon-Mars has 2 moons and this fact supports my theory because Mars with small mass could attract two moons because the debris were around it while Venus has greater mass but couldn't create its own moon because the debris are moved with Mars motion- the rest debris are attracted by Jupiter gravity and created the asteroid belt

Shortly

The planet data analysis compares between the theory and the planets data to see if there's harmony between them and if the data logical analysis supports the theory

Second Item - Major Problems In The Physics Book

(1) The Physicist Wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

(2) Planet Motion Energy Definition

(3) Mass Gravity Force Analysis

(4) The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

1stProblem The Physicist wrong Vision Contradicts The Nature System

The Physicist Vision

The physicist supposes there's (a unit of building)- by that- the physicist sees the matter (mass) as a wall and this wall is consisted of bricks (small similar units) and the physicist searches for this (unit of building)–

For that the physicist divided the matter and found the particles and then the particle is divided into Molecules and the Molecule is divided into atoms and the atom is divided into nucleus and electron moves around and the nucleus is divided into proton and Neutron- and the proton is divided into quarks …etc

The physicist searches for the building unit- for that he divides anything to reach to this building unit-

The Nature System Vision

The Nature designer aims to create INTEGRATION- as the marriage– male and female- For that- the matter is created complementary one another-means- The Matter Is Created In Pairs (as Gamma ray 1.2 Mev produces electron and positron)

No building unit- AND

I want to show how the physicist causes fatal error for the research method while the physicist divides the elements (from matter to particle to molecule to atom to proton to quarks …etc) this division from out into inner till reach to very small unit which the physicist considered the building unit – that causes to destroy the geometrical design of the integration process- Shortly- the physicist sees a universe (never be created by the designer)- while the designer created the integration is a goal and created tools to perform this integration the physicist destroyed the integration tools while he searched for the building unit which is not found at all.

NOTICE

Another point shows the physicist wrong vision is (The Planet Motion)

While the solar planets move as gears in one machine and all planets motions are unified into one unified general motion- means- all planets motions are unified and produce one result only (one unified motion)- the physicist supposes each planet motion is independent-by that- in place of one machine of gears moves and produces one unified motion (one result) the physicist told us each planet motion is independent and No unification is found for the planets motions –here – one more time the physicist sees very different picture from the real one- in place of one hand has five fingers the physicist sees five independent moving fingers

2ndProblem Planet Motion Energy Definition

Let's remember this question where's Planet Motion Energy?

We agreed planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) and this energy must be stored in the space as moving waves because planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body otherwise this planet temperature would be raised- that tells- the space has moving waves produced by planet motion energy

Also –we agreed- planet motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity-

Shortly- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in the space and its motion energy produces waves in the space and these waves move by velocity (47.4 km/s) –this analysis creates 3 difficulties for the physics book let's see them

First Difficulty

This analysis tells the space has moving waves are produced by planets motions energies– But- the scientists discovered these waves and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field- and they called them (gravitational waves)- I prove the sun doesn’t produce a gravitational field and has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity – But- here we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?) because planet motion energy analysis forces us to accept that these waves are produced by the planets motions energies

Here – we need to answer (from what source these waves are produced?)

I prove the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field.

I provided two major proves

(1st proof) I proves there's no gravitational field and the sun has no massive gravity and no planet moves by the sun gravity

(2nd proof) the gravitational waves reflection proves the waves are produced by the planets motions energies because the waves reflection causes effects on the planets data

Second Difficulty

Now we know planet motion energy is stored in the space as moving waves (the gravitational waves)- But- the planets move since long period of time means the planets motions should cause to store massive motion energy in space during this long period- Now -where's this stored massive energy? also the energy can NOT be stored in space forever- so what's happening for this stored massive energy? I prove the sun rays are created from this stored massive energy and not from the sun nuclear fusion process- this is my research hypothesis – in all cases we should know how this stored massive energy be used because this massive energy can cause risk for the solar system stability.

Third Difficulty

Newton Mass gravity definition is disproved by planet motion energy

Because

Suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity and the moon motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) now let's ask- From What Source The Moon Motion Energy Is Provided? What's the moon motion reason? The mass gravity- means- the mass should provide the motion energy- means – if The moon moves by the Earth gravity that necessitates to decrease the masses of the Earth and the moon by the motion energy- here's the problem- Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass- this decrease is done because of the motion energy

The analysis tells us–the physicist supposes planet motion produces NO energy this is the only one solution for the problems created by the physicist neglect to observe planet motion energy-

3rdProblem Mass Gravity Force Analysis

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(i)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time-

(ii)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- Planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- planet creation and motion is done by one force only- otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it-

Suppose planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force this planet to move against its internal structure and that will cause this planet to be broken-

Imagine a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs- this human will be dead by this motion-

That's why the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created- and he considered - the creation force is a historical force has no effect on the current motion- Shortly-the sun didn't cause to create any planet and the sun doesn't cause any planet to move

(iii)

We agreed that, mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- because –any motion will produce energy- suppose the moon moves by the Earth mass gravity- the moon motion produces energy- and – from what source this energy is provided? From the masses of the Earth and the moon –here's the problem

Where Any Motion Is Done By Mass Gravity Will Cause To Decrease This Mass

BUT Mass gravity is a fact - the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon are bond by their masses gravity ) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon.

(iv)

The planets order contradicts the gravitation equation- for example- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the planets initial conditions)- all these are wrong- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on this planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do)

where d=planet orbital distance

do= its neighbor orbital distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct and discussed in item no. (III)- Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor planets orbits (item No. III has more proves)

(v)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is wrong - I define planet velocity (my 5th equation)- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

The Conclusion

The Sun Doesn't Produce Any Gravitational Field

4th Problem The Matter Creation And Its Nature Definition

In following we compare between the physics book theory about the matter creation and my theory about it- the discussion contains Two points

I- The Physics Book Theory About The Creation of the Matter (Mass)

The Matter Is Created Independently From Any Outer Motion – means- even if the matter motion is stopped the matter is still found and never be perished (the motion here means the outer motion and not the atoms motions)

The Matter Is Motionless By Nature

The Matter Needs Mass Gravity Force To Cause Its Motion

The Matter Data And Dimensions Are Not Changed By Its Motion

The big bang theory tells planet is created by random creation- for example- Jupiter diameter is created by unknown value and Jupiter is collided many times in its history and these collisions caused Jupiter diameter (and mass) to be decreased- based on that– Jupiter diameter value (142984 km) is found by random process and without any geometrical reason behind- by that- the big bang theory prevent us to use any planet data to discover the creation and motion rules of this planet.

Note – The physicist doesn't use planet data in forming a theory to explain this planet motion-for example- Jupiter diameter is 142984 km and the physicist has a theory explains Jupiter motion but if Jupiter diameter is changed into 180000 km the theory will have no change because the physicist doesn't consider Jupiter diameter is a player in its motion- that's why the big bang theory is wrong because it supposes the change in diameter and mass doesn't cause a change in motion

Shortly- the physics book doesn't tell how the matter is created nor what's the matter nature- we remember Einstein problem in physics- he told (All researches in particle electromagnetic properties can't predict this particle behavior in the daily life physics) that shows two different branches of the physics one for the electromagnetism and the other for the mass gravity physics

II- My Theory About The Creation of the matter (mass) –

The Matter Main Features Are:

The Matter Is Created In Pairs Means- No Single Matter Is Created -This conclusion depends on Gamma ray experiment -From Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) electron and positron are created- by this experiment- the matter is created in pairs from electromagnetic waves- the produced pair particles motions depend on each other (or related to each other) (notice the creation system is male and female–two complementary matters-that tells the source of energy must be electromagnetic wave)

The matter is created depending on its motion- means- the motion is found before the matter creation- this conclusion depends on my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity (for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)- means–Planet motion is defined before its creation -later explained

Lorentz transformation proves Matter dimensions are effected by high speed motion- also- Lorentz transformation proves the matter and space are created from the same energy for that particle length and distance both are contracted by the same one equation (Lorentz length contraction effect)

The Matter Is Created Depending On Light Motion –

The Discussion Proves These Features Strongly

The Matter Creation Depends On 5 Main Facts Which Are

Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron

Lorentz Transformation

My Planet Diameter Equation

The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)

Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

(Item No. i) Gamma Ray Can Produce Electron And Positron From Gamma ray (1.2Mev) one electron and one positron are created- I prove the matter is created by this method- means- the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

(Item No. ii) Lorentz Transformation

Lorentz transformation tells

If a particle moves by high speed motion (near to speed of light), this particle length would be contracted and its mass would be increased and its time would be dilated

I accept this meaning clearly and find this meaning supports my theory strongly BUT Many physics Books tell the following

(NO Real Change Is Done For Any Particle Data Moves By High Speed Motion But All Changes Are Illusions Of Measurements)-

Means- while a particle is moving by high speed motion and the experiments results show contraction in its length and increasing in its mass and dilation in its time – these changes are just illusions in measurements and the particle itself has no change in any data - tenth of books tell this meaning clearly and with confirmation and the physicist killed Lorentz work and made Lorentz transformation measures illusions and not facts- regardless the empirical proves which supports Lorentz transformation

I refuse these books idea because

The Physics Is The Measurements Science And What's Measured Is The Fact

If no real changes are done how the problem of Michelson and Morelly experiment is solved?- also- Why the synchronous events in one frame can't be synchronous in another (as Einstein stated) where no change is found for any data- the distances are Not contracted nor the time is dilated nor the mass is increased why the events can NOT be synchronous in any frame?

If the particle own data is measured correctly while it moves by my motion velocity and these measurements are suffered from illusions because the particle moves by high speed motion relative to my motion that means (I'm the universe reference point)

We notice- Lorentz length contraction equation can't distinguish between particle length and a distance, both can be contracted by the same one equation- that supports my theory tells (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same Energy)–

My planet diameter equation proves planet diameter is created depending on this planet motion and also proves the matter and space are created from the same one energy which supports Lorentz transformation

NOTICE

The major importance of Lorentz transformation is

The transformation proves there's a connection between particle dimensions and its motion means the motion has effect on particle dimensions definition and by that the matter (mass) can't be independent because its existence depends on a motion- shortly (The Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion)

The matter and space are created from the same energy- because- particle length and the distance both are contracted by the same equation (Lorentz length contraction effect) shortly (Matter And Space Are Created From The Same One Energy) (This theory is proved by my planet diameter equation)

(Item No. iii) My Planet Diameter Equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

Discussion

(1)

The Equation Concept Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- because– If this planet changes its orbit (orbital distance) its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result- the designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and the planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and the planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between Planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but also it contains many variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if the Planet changes its orbital distance- this planet orbital period, and velocity and rotation period would be changed but its diameter will be saved

(2)

Matter Definition Based On My Planet Diameter Equation

My equation tells, Planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- for example Neptune diameter is 49528 km because it velocity is 5.4 km/s where the velocity is used in the diameter definition equation- means- Planet motion is defined before this planet creation- how can that be possible? let's answer in following

The original energy was in motion and planet matter is created from this moving original energy and planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after Planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data and dimensions are created that's why Planet data is in full harmony with its motion features- that explains how planet diameter is created based on its velocity

Shortly- the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature- the muscle dimensions depend on the blood motion- similar to that- the matter dimensions depend on this energy motion from which this matter is created-

Also space is similar to the sea of water- and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) is found on the sea page- the matter creates for itself a distinguished picture different from the space picture and the matter moves by a different velocity from the space motion velocity- as the whirlpool (vortex) on the sea page- it's created by the sea water but it has a distinguish picture from the sea waves and it moves by a different velocity from the sea waves- that explains how the moving energy can effect on the matter creation data- for example- we have a whirlpool (vortex) its diameter is 2 meters- why does this diameter equal= 2 meters? The diameter is created depends on the water motion velocity, pressure, amount and motion angle and many other features of (the moving water)- the moving water creates this whirlpool with diameter 2 meters and as long as the water motion is not changed this diameter will not be changed also- (notice- The Gravitational Waves Prove The Space Has Motion And Not Static)

NOTICE Also (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) Newton is wrong, because planet moves by the energy from which this planet is created- as explained here – means– The Matter Is Not Motionless By Nature- The Matter moves with the energy from which this matter is created-

(3)

Matter Existence Depends On Its Motion

Shortly-if the motion is stopped the matter will be perished- again the matter is similar to a muscle in a creature body- if the blood motion is stopped the muscle will be perished- this is the fact- Based on that- Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s if Neptune stops its motion Neptune diameter and matter will be perished-

The fact I prove is (The Matter Creation Depends On Its Motion) – Lorentz transformation and my planet diameter equation supports this fact strongly

DEEP DISCUSSION

(4)

The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created

Planet velocity is defined based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) let's prove that

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)

322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)

The idea is understandable – let's summarize it in following

(i)

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=constant= 322) and

(ii)

Planet data is created depending on its velocity- means- planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation and based on the velocity all other data is created- as we see in the planet diameter equation, planet diameter and all creation data is created depending on this planet velocity- means- based on (v1/v2) but planet orbital distance is defined based on (v1/v2)^2 and planet orbital period is defined based on (v1/v2)^3

Based on this system planet data is created but we know that planet orbital distance is defined before planet creation and based on the orbit, planet velocity is defined and then all data is defined based on the planet velocity-

(iii)

Now the idea is clear- let's summarize it

The planets velocities are created complementary one another based on the rule (v1v2=322) and planet diameter is created depending on its velocity for that reason planet diameter is created complementary to another planet diameter- let's prove that

341.7 million km = Jupiter diameter 142984 km x Pluto diameter 2390 km

341.7 million km = Jupiter radius 71492 km x Mercury diameter 4879 km (2%)

341.7 million km = Saturn diameter 120536 km x 4 Mars diameter 6792 km (4%)

341.7 million km = Uranus diameter 51118 km x Earth radius 6378 km (5%)

341.7 million km = Neptune diameter 49528 km x 2 The Moon diameter 3475 km

Clearly we see the planets diameters are complementary one another- because the matter is created in pairs and no single matter is created

Notice (1)

Suppose the physicist can create a type of single matter which has no complementary can that disprove my theory tells (The Matter Is Created In Pair And No Single Matter Is Created?) NO NEVER

Because- the matter is created from the original energy and the energy uses a system depends on matters in pairs complementary one another- means any type of matter can't be used by the original energy will be neglected and useless because the energy uses matters in pairs

(Item No. v) The Coherence Of Light (Young Interference)

I provide proves tell Gamma Ray and Young experiments are used in the solar planets creation – let's remember these experiments

(1st Experiment) Gamma ray (1.2 Mev) can produce electron and positron

(2nd Experiment) the coherence of light experiment (Young Interference)

Let's provide the proves for the using of these two experiments in the planets creation

Gamma Ray Experiment

There are two facts prove this experiment concept is used in the planets creation

First Fact Planet creation data is defined based on its velocity- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation because planet diameter is created depending on this planet velocity as explained before (Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s)-means- Planet velocity is the first data in this planet creation process and based on this velocity all planet creation and motion data is created

Second Fact Planet velocity is complementary one another, which is proved by the rule (v1v2= 322 = constant)- that shows the planets data must be complementary one another as I have proved in the diameters values analysis

Shortly – The planets data are complementary one another (similar to the electron and positron are created from Gamma ray)

The Coherence of light Experiment (Young Interference)

There are two facts prove this experiment concept using in the solar system creation

1st Fact

The planets order is typical for Young interference- if we consider planet diameter is equivalent to the fringe breadth by that the planets order be typical for Young interference where the greatest fringe is in the middle (the greatest planet Jupiter) and the fringes breadth is deceased gradually on both sides

(I Proved Mars Original Orbit Was Between Mercury And Venus- so the original inner planets order was Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) which shows gradual decreasing in diameters- the outer planets diameters also is decreased gradually

2nd Fact

There's a coherence of light in the solar system- what does that mean?

Means- while planet orbit has energy of a light beam- another light beam enters this orbit by that there are two light beams in the same orbit- these two light beams create coherence of light- the planets orbits creation explain this fact in details- but here I want to prove this fact by simple direct proof before the planets orbits creation discussion –let's write this proof here

We have seen that the planets velocities are complementary one another by the rule (v1v2=constant=322) and planet all data is created depending on its velocity- by that the planets diameters also follow this rule where (R1R2= constant) as I have proved in my planet diameter equation

Now let's ask – can the planets orbits complementary one another? NO

So- how this rule (v1v2=constant= 322) is found?

By the energy reflection- means- the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection of energy causes the velocities to be reflected on one another and that produced the rule (v1v2=constant= 322)

We note the planets can’t be reflected on each other because the planets are connected with their orbits- and the energy reflection needs freedom in motion- means- this reflection of the planets velocities are done by effect of the energy reflection- please note- the energy reflection is a proved fact in the solar system- this fact is proved by hundreds of the planets data because the energy reflection cause effects on the planets data- shortly- the planets data is created by effects of the energy reflection-

Here we see the coherence of light is created because the orbits have energy where the space is energy and (Another energy is reflected and moved through all orbits and caused to create the planets data) by that each orbit has two energies together- I prove both energies are light beams-for that the two light beams create a coherence of light

I want to say- there are two facts prove the solar system has coherence of light which are the reflection of energy and the planets order

The planets orbits creation explain this theory in details I discuss it in item no. (**)

NOTICE

Please Note – I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars is migrated to its current orbit behind the Earth- by that the inner planets original order was (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth) here we see planets diameters are decreased gradually from the Earth to Mercury where Jupiter was the planet beside the Earth- means – the planets diameters are decreased gradually from Jupiter to Mercury- and the outer planets – the planets diameters also are decreased gradually- as I explained – if we compare planet diameter with fringe- the planets order be typical to Young interference – but – the order is reflected each other –let's see that

The inner planets (Mercury – Mars – Venus – The Earth)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates longer orbital distance – but

The outer planets (Jupiter– Saturn– Uranus– Neptune –Pluto)- the order tells greater diameter necessitates shorter distance

Here we see the orders are reflected one another- but in Young interference there's no reflection- I want to say- the planets orders are reflected because of the sun position- if the sun is not found no reflection will be found- that means- the reflection of energy caused to create the sun in the solar system because the sun creation causes the planets order to be reflected one another- my paper proves the sun is created after all planets creation and motion – and the sun is created by the reflected energy

(Item No. vi) Planet Diameter Creation Depends On This Planet Orbit

The solar planets matters and their distances are created from one energy and this one energy is provided by one light beam and this light beam moves by speed = 1.16 million km per second (The speed is proved strongly and decisively)

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) built the solar system orbits starting from Mercury orbit toward Pluto orbit- the light created the planets orbits before any planet creation- means- all orbits are created before any planet creation- the orbits are created based on each other (this fact is proved by my planet orbital distance equation) after the light created all orbits and reach to Pluto orbit- the light energy is consumed in the space creation- and the rest energy is found in one light beam its speed is (300000 km/s = the known speed of light)- we understand this is one light beam its speed was 1.16 million km per second before the space creation (In Mercury Orbit) and its speed becomes 300000 km/s after the space creation (in Pluto orbit) as result for the energy consumption in the space creation-

In Pluto orbit - the light could Not move any further to build any more orbits because any additional space creation will consume more energy and that will decrease the light speed to be less than 300000 km/s (the known speed of light) – and – No known light moves by speed less than 300000 km/s – means- the light had no energy to move any further after Pluto orbit- for that- the light returns to its origin point (Mercury orbit) for that the light is reflected with speed (300000 km/s) from Pluto orbit to Mercury orbit passing through the built orbits– no energy is required in this motion for that the light beam moves with speed of light (300000 km/s) till Mercury orbit.

Please note- the light (300000 km/s) is reflected from Pluto to Mercury

The reflection of the light beam (300000 km/s) Caused To Create The Solar Planets

Comments

The light (1.16 million km per second) created the orbits with energy means the created orbits have energies- and each planet orbit energy is less than its previous neighbor orbit because the planets velocities are decreased gradually- almost the energy is less by rate 80% because the velocities are rated with (0.8)

Each planet diameter is created based on its orbit energy- the planet is similar to a tree planted in a ground and the planet orbit is this ground- that's why each planet diameter depends on this planet velocity and orbital inclination- please note Mars diameter equation proves this fact because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars diameter is created based on this orbit energy and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one behind the Earth but Mars diameter equation still shows Mars original orbital inclination (5.1degrees) while Mars current orbital inclination is 1.9 degrees- Mars diameter is created based on this inclination (5.1 deg) for that this inclination is seen in Mars diameter equation frequently (please review my planet diameter equation)

The Occurrence Of The Coherence Of Light - The light beam (300000 km/s) is reflected and passed through all created orbits- that shows there two light beams are found in the same area (in any orbit)- because in each orbit there's this orbit energy which is found with the orbit creation by the light (1.16 million km per second) for that we say (Space Is Energy) because any orbit has energy found with its creation- and also the reflected light beam (300000 km/s) passed through all orbits- by that- in any orbit there are two different light beams (two different energies) and these light beams create A Coherence together-

The Amazing Coherence Of Light There's a major interesting point here-the light beam (300000 km/s) created a coherence with the light 1.16 million km per second! BUT HOW?? because the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed and its energy is used for the space creation and the rest energy is this light beam moves by known speed of light (300000 km/s)!! how can the light beam (300000 km/s) meet the original light beam the 1.16 million km per second to create this coherence of light?

Please note- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the major used speed in the solar system data- means- the speed 1.16 million km per second is the secret by which the solar system data can be understood because all data is created as function in this speed-I prove that in the next pages- but this information is written to explain that the light 1.16 million km per second is consumed but its energy still works and causes continuous effect- BUT HOW??

Let's write the answer

The light (300000 km/s) is reflected to move from Pluto to Mercury (while the original light 1.16 million km per second moved from Mercury to Pluto) means the light (300000 km/s) moved in opposite direction for the motion of the original light 1.16 million km per second- MEANS- the light (300000km/s) moved in the opposite direction of space to reach to Mercury- BUT NOT ONLY- in fact- the light (300000 km/s) moved also in the opposite direction OF TIME and moved into its own past – and in past – this light beam (300000 km/s) met the original light beam 1.16 million km per second – and in past – the two light beams created the coherence of light and then this coherence of light results have effects on our present time-

Shortly- the coherence of light in the solar system proves the light beam (300000 km/s) moved on the time-axis and this is an empirical proof for the time-axis motion where the light can move simply on the time axis

Notice – this motion can help us to create the time machine- because- if the light can move into the past that means we may use this motion and take photos of the past events and this will be our time machine which can go into the past and make photos and videos for the past events – even the events since thousands of years we can see in videos or in photos – this motion of light can give us a great option to create our machine of time

Notice the original light beam 1.16 million km per second can not move into the future to meet the light beam (300000 km/s) because in future the original light 1.16 million km per second is NOT found because its energy is consumed in the space creation- but- the light beam (300000km/s) can move into the past because in the past the light beam (300000 km/s) was part in the original light beam 1.16 million km per second and by that the two light beams be found in the same time

Notice – we can not travel ourselves into the past- because planet diameter is created depending on its velocity- as proved by my planet diameter equation- means- the matter is created depending on its motion velocity- and the velocity is a motion in defined direction- the light is free in motion and doesn't forced to move in any direction for that the light has this option to move on the time axis but the matter is created depending on a motion in defined direction (no freedom in motion) for that the matter can't move on the time axis because the motion force the matter to move in a defined direction – the matter moved just to the future– and the matter can't move into the past-

Planet Creation Machine Please note–we see the coherence of light is done by the two light beams 300000 km/s and 1.16 million km per second (because the light beam 300000 km/s can reach to the light 1.16 million km per second by moving into its past)- shortly – here we have 2 light beams in any orbit- and these two light beams cause two motions – we can imagine these two motions are perpendicular on each other – this perpendicular motions create a wave and planet is created as a wave (Particle is a wave also)- that explains how the planets are created

Please note- The reflection of energy is very effective in the solar planets data because the reflection of energy caused the planets to be created- the matter can't be created by the energy of any orbit alone but the reflection of energy adds second energy inside each orbit- by that- two energies are found in any orbit (two light beams) by these two light beams the light coherence is created and also the planets are created as waves-that explains why the planets data prove the reflection of energy because the planets are created by this energy reflection- as when we plant a tree we need a ground and we need seeds to be put in this ground- two players- the planets are created by two energies (two light beams coherence) and for that the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds (300000 km/s) and (1.16 million km per second) as planet velocity definition proves.

Please note the Matter Is Created In Pairs (as electron and positron from Gamma rays 1.2 Mev) – this is the main system of creation but -In planets creation the rule is used with some complex method- the complementary is found for the planets velocities and the planets data is created depending on these velocities- the same concept but the method is more complex- this similar to the creature creation- the cell reproduction is done by split the cell into two new cells- but in higher creatures the reproduction use more complex methods but the cell method is still the base of these complex methods

Please note the previous analysis tries to conclude how the planet matter is created – I put all available facts to reach to this conclusion- the matter real mechanism may be still not clear but many provided facts help to reach to this mechanism- also- we know the main concept behind the matter creation which is (The Matter Is Created In Pairs And Not Single Matter Is Created)

This Concept Is Proved Strongly And Clearly By The Gamma Rays Experiment And The Planets Data

(Item No. vii) The Proves Of The Light Speed 1.16 million km per second

THE SPEED PROVES

In following I prove the speed 1.16 million km per second is found

The paper provides many powerful proves – but - here I refer to 4 proves only

(1st Proof)

Planet Velocity Analysis proves the speed 1.16 million km per second

Data

322 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocities) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocities)

322 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2

322 = 29.8 km/s (the Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocities) x 2

322 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

322 = (17.9 km/s)^2 (Ceres velocity) (Max error 2%)

Discussion

This is one rule used to define planet velocity- we know this rule (v1v2 = constant =322) – other rules are discussed in planet velocity definition- here we ask only

Why the constant is 322?? Because 1160000 seconds = 3600 x 322 hours

Means – for example

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance 1.16 million km – and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance 1.16 million km-

Means- the light moves 1.16 million km but we see it as 1160000 seconds and based on this period the constant 322 hours is defined and based on this constant the planets velocities are defined- means- the planets velocities are defined as functions in the speed 1.16 million km per second

(2nd Proof) the planets orbital circumferences total is defined by light speed 1.16 million km per second- let's prove that

100733 million km = 86400 seconds x 1160000 km/s

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

86400 seconds = The solar day

Means- light its speed 1.16 million km per second passes in a solar day a distance = 100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

The planets data analysis proves that the solar day is the major period of time in the solar system- that because- all planets rotation periods are defined based on it- the paper proves this fact strongly

(3rd Proof)

The planets orbits and orbital distances are created from the energy of the light beam its speed is 1.16 million km per second- for that- this speed is registered in the distances data – let's prove that in following

Example

778.6 million km (Jupiter orbital distance) = 1160000 km/s x 671 seconds

721 million km (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 1160000 km/s x 629 seconds

Where

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

This example tells that

The light (its speed 1.16 million km per second) created the distances based on each other- means

The light uses 671 million km (Jupiter Venus Distance) as a period of time 671 seconds to pass the distance 778.6 million km (Jupiter Orbital Distance)

Also -the light uses 629 million km (Jupiter Earth Distance) as a period of time 629 seconds to pass the distance 721 million km (Jupiter Mercury Distance)

By this method the light (1.16 million km per second) creates the distances based on each other- means – the distances be created in one network and by one design

the previous data is example for so many other distances let's see them in following

(778.6 / 671)= (721/629) = (629/551)= (2x551/940)= (4900/4188) = (5906/5127)= (5127/4437) = (4345/3717)= 1.16

Where

778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

721 million km = Jupiter Mercury Distance

671 million km = Jupiter Venus Distance

629 million km = Jupiter Earth Distance

551 million km = Jupiter Mars Distance

940 million km = Earth Orbital Circumference

4188 million km = 2 x 2094 million km (Jupiter Uranus Distance)

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

5127 million km = Pluto Jupiter Distance

4437 million km = Mercury Neptune Distance

4345 million km = The Earth Neptune Distance

3717 million km = Jupiter Neptune Distance

The paper provides so many other powerful proves for the speed 1.16 million km

Notice

(1.16/0.3) x 2π = 24.3

The equation tells, because the solar system is created by light beam its speed 1.16million km per second with its other speed 300000 km/s

For that - the space is created in curved lines (2π) and the time is created based on the solar day (24 hours)- that explains why the planets orbital circumferences total depends on the solar day period

(4th Proof)

300000 = (205.8)^2 x 7.1 where

The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s and I add the Earth moon velocity 29.8 km/s the total be 205.8 km/s - the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s)

7.1 is Lorentz length contraction effect produced by speed 99% of speed of light-

Shortly- the reflection of energy causes to square the wave velocity for that the unified wave velocity (205.8 km/s) is squared by the energy reflection

Now (205.8 km/s)^2 = 42354

The rate 7.1 causes to increase the distance from (42354 km) to (42354 x 7.1= 300000 km)- note-although 7.1 is Lorentz length contraction rate but it increases the distances in place of the contraction effect because the reflection of energy causes to reflect the geometrical effects-

shortly the equation (300000=(205.8)^ x 7.1) proves the planets velocities are defined as function in the known speed of light (300000 km/s)

that proves the planets velocities are defined based on the two speeds of light –the known speed of light 300000 km/s and the original speed of light 1.16 million km per second.

NOTICE

Lorentz length contraction effect for a velocity 99% of speed of light (297000 km/s) is (7.1) as seen in the equation but the solar system uses this rate with modification

(7.1/100)+ 1 = 1.0725

And this final rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all planets data (distances, periods, axial tilts and other data)- this effect is a proof for the motion by high velocity because this rate (1.0725) controls 40% of all data in the solar system and no explanation except Lorentz length contraction effect- more proves are in (Item No. 5-6 Can Relativistic Effects Be Found In The Solar System?)

(Item No. viii) Planet creation depends on light motion

The previous analysis proves planet diameter is created depending on its orbit- specifically- planet diameter depends on its velocity and the velocity depends on its orbit- this fact is proved by my planet diameter equation (where planet diameter is created depending on its velocity) and by Kepler statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity) – but-

Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity?

Where I proved no planet moves by the sun gravity- by that the planet orbital distance has no effect on this planet motion or velocity nor planet mass has any effect on its velocity-So - Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity? The next data proves there's a connection between planet velocity and its orbit through light motion

DATA

300000 km = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 3600 x 17.73

5906 s x 300000 km/s = 1773 million km

300000 km = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 3600 x 15.43

5144 s x 300000 km/s = 1543 million km ((5144= 4495 x (1.0725)^2)

300000 km = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 3600 x 8.6

2870 s x 300000 km/s = 8600 million km

300000 km = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 3600 x 12.26

4085 s x 300000 km/s = 1226 million km

300000 km = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 3600 x 6.36

2120 s x 300000 km/s = 636 million km

Where

5906 million km = Pluto Orbital Distance

4495 million km = Neptune Orbital Distance

2872 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance = 2 x Saturn Orbital Distance

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

Notice

18048 million km (Uranus Orbital Circumference) = 4.4 x 4085 million km

4900 million km (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) = 2.3 x 2120 million km

4.4 = 2.2 x 2 (with 2.3 the error 5%)

Discussion

The data shows each outer planet velocity is related to its orbital distance by effect of the light motion (300000 km/s)- Uranus and Jupiter shows the rate 4.4 which related to Jupiter (3.1 deg Jupiter axial tilt + 1.3 deg Jupiter orbital inclination)- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter that causes the two planets use the same rate.

The data proves the planets motions depend on light motion and explains how the planet orbit defines its velocity

Notice

0.8 = (27.8 /35) = (24.1/29.8) = (10.8/13.1) = (5.4/6.8) = (17.2/21.4) = 19.8/24)

Where

35 km/s = Venus velocity

29.8 km/s = The Earth velocity

27.8 km/s = The moon velocity

13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity

6.8 km/s = Uranus velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity note (10.8 = 5.4)

17.2 hours = Uranus Rotation Period

21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 h Saturn Rotation Period

19.8 hours = 2 x 9.9 h Jupiter Rotation Period

24 hours = The solar day period

The data shows harmony between the planets velocities and their rotation periods

Third Item - My 5 Equations

My 5 Equations Prove Planets Creation and Motions Data Is Defined By Geometrical Rules (NO Random Creation)-I provide here the three main equations (1st, 4th and 5th) let's refer to them in following

Planet orbital distance equation (My 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do)

where d= planet orbital distance and do= its previous neighbor orbital distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

The equation depends on the planets order, just 2 neighbor planets can be used

The equation exceptions are, Earth depends on Mercury Not Venus – and Mars depends on Venus Not Earth And Pluto depends on Uranus Not Neptune

The Equation Concept Support

let's suppose–There's a right triangle by the 3 points The Sun, Mercury and Venus)- by that - Venus angle is (61 degrees) because Venus orbital distance (108.2 mkm) x cos (61) = Venus Mercury distance (50.3 mkm) – and

Earth angle is (51 degrees) because Earth orbital distance (149.6 mkm) x cos (51) = Earth Mercury distance (91.7 mkm) – and

Mars angle is (41.7 degrees) because Mars orbital distance (227.9mkm) x cos (41.7)= Mars Mercury distance (170 mkm)- and

Jupiter angle is (22.2 degrees) because Jupiter orbital distance (778.6 mkm) x cos (22.2)= Jupiter Mercury distance (721 mkm)

Similar to that – Saturn angle is 16.5, Uranus angle is 11.6 deg, Neptune angle is 9.2 deg and Pluto angle is 8 deg- these angles follow the same system

for example -Pluto angle is (8 degrees) because Pluto orbital distance (5906 mkm) x cos (8)= Pluto Mercury distance (5848 mkm) –

NOTICE No. (1)

The right angle and its triangle is (a hypothesis) – but we can prove it's a fact because (v1/v2) = (θ1/ θ2) -means – these angles are rated with their planets velocities – for example (Neptune velocity 5.4/ Pluto velocity 4.7) = (9.2 deg /8 deg)

NOTICE No. (2) these angles are complementary one another for that

940 = 61 x 2 x 8 = 51 x 2 x 9.2 = 41.7 x 22.2

(61 degrees) is Venus angle and (51 degrees) is The Earth angle and (41.7 degrees) is Mars angle and (8 degrees) is Pluto angle and (9.2 degrees) is Neptune angle and (22.2 degrees) is Jupiter angle

DISCUSSION

The equation and angles system data prove the following

(1)

The planets orbital distances are defined based on their neighbors and NO mass is required to define it- Newton is wrong- planet orbital distance is Not defined based on this planet mass (also planet motion doesn't depend on its mass)

Shortly- the mass is not related for the orbital distance definition at all

(2) The gravitation equation is wrong because it contradicts the planets order- for example (Mercury- Venus – the Earth) this order tells more mass needs longer orbital distance while the gravitation equation tells more mass needs shorter distance- clearly the equation contradicts the planets order- also Jupiter the greatest mass is not the more near planet to the sun – when we asked the physicist he told this is happened because of the planets initial conditions- my equation proves no initial conditions have effects on any distance – all distances are defined by the same one rule and the angles system supports the equation concept proves that (the planets orbital distances are defined based on each other and no mass is required in this definition)

Planet Diameter Equation (My 4th equation)

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity

r = Planet Diameter

I= Planet Orbital Inclination

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

Example Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8

89143 = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s = Saturn velocity and

5.4 km/s = Neptune velocity

1.8 degrees= Neptune Orbital Inclination

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

All planets diameters follow this equation perfectly

Notice

This equation is discussed with matter creation and definition (item no. I) also the equation is analyzed and discussed with all details in the paper discussions

Planet velocity equation (My 5th equation)

Planet velocity definition is important point of study because many planet data is defined based on its velocity- specifically

Planet diameter is defined based on the rate (v1/v2) by my planet diameter equation –discussed before – and

Planet orbital distance is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^2 –and

Planet orbital period is defined by the rate (v1/v2)^3

Please note – Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and it's fact proved by the planets data – but Newton stated Planet motion depends on its mass- this is NOT Fact and Planet velocity is defined without any effect of its mass as the data shows

(I have refuted Newton theory of the sun gravity and his theory for mass gravity)

Now – let's ask - How Is Planet Velocity Defined?

Planet velocity is defined by Five Rules let's see them in following

(i) First Rule

v1v2 = constant= 322 (my 5th equation)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Mercury velocity) =322

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 =322

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 =322

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) =322 (Max error 2%)

The rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are defined in pairs and not individually, each planet velocity has its own complementary- the rule tells the velocities are reflected on one another- the reflection of energy and data is discussed later.

In this rule we interest for the constant (322)- let's ask- why the constant = 322?

The constant 322 depends on the speed 1.16 million km per second because

(1160000 seconds = 322 hours) - Means

Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves in 6.8 hours a distance = 1.16 million km and

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves in 47.4 hours a distance = 1.16 million km

Shortly -we realize that the constant 322 is produced based on the speed 1.16 million km per second- means- the planets velocities are complementary each other because they are defined as functions in this same speed 1.16 million km per second

(This is similar to electron and positron are produced from Gamma ray, The two particles depend on Gamma energy in their masses)

Based On This Data

I concluded there's a light beam its speed 1.16 million km per second and from this light beam energy the solar system is created- and the planets velocities are defined as functions in this speed 1.16 million km per second and that causes the velocities to be complementary each other-

(Note the speed 1.16 million km per second is proved strongly in my paper)

(ii) Second Rule

v1v2 = 1

The velocity here uses the solar day (86400 seconds) – let's prove that-

Mercury moves per solar day = 4.095 million km

Venus moves per solar day = 3.024 million km

The Earth moves per solar day = 2.574 million km

The Moon moves per solar day = 2.4 million km

Mars moves per solar day = 2.082 million km

Jupiter moves per solar day = 1.1318 million km

Saturn moves per solar day = 0.838 million km

Uranus moves per solar day = 0.5875 million km

Neptune moves per solar day = 0.4665 million km

Pluto moves per solar day = 0.406 million km

AND

0.406 (Pluto velocity) x 2.4 (the moon velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.4665 (Neptune velocity) x 2.082 (Mars velocity) = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.5875 (Uranus velocity) x 3.024 (Venus velocity)/1.772 = 1 (error 2.5%)

0.838 (Saturn velocity) x 1.1318 (Jupiter velocity) = 1 (error 5%)

(1.772 = π^1/2)

The second rule tells very similar meaning (v1v2= constant= 1)

The data uses the velocities per solar day for that the constant is changed from 322 into 1 but the rule is the same- (v1v2= Constant)

I want to say- the rule (v1v2 = Constant) tells that (The Velocities Are Reflected On Each Other) this conclusion is simple one (A x 1/A= constant=1)

The rule proves the energy is reflected in the solar system and this reflection has effect on the planets data and for that the planets velocities are defined by this energy reflection and the velocities are produced complementary each other as a result.

Notice the second rule causes confusion because the complementary player is changed- for example Pluto is complementary with Venus (in the first rule 35 x 4.7 x 2 = 322) but Pluto is complementary with the Earth moon in the second rule (0.406 x 2.4 = 1) that tells the players are changed which is illogical idea- how can we solve this problem? The third rule solves it – let's see this rule in following

(iii) Third Rule

v1/v2 = 0.8 (based on the planets order)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 (35 km/s = Venus velocity error 7.25%)

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 (The moon velocity)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 (Mars velocity) (error 1%)

24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 9.7 (Saturn velocity)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8 = 2 x 5.4 (Neptune velocity) (error 3%)

6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 0.8 = 5.4 (Neptune velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3 (Pluto velocity 4.7 the error 7.25%)

Please note

The error 7.25 is found by the rate 1.0725 – that means

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 = 1.0725 x 35 km/s (Venus velocity)

5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 0.8 = 4.3= 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) / 1.0725

29.8 km/s (Earth velocity) = 27.78 km/s (The moon velocity) x 1.0725

We know the rate 1.0725 is found by Lorentz length contraction effect- and we know this rate has effect on around 40% of all planets data – that's why we see this rate has effect on the planets velocities definition-

Let's remember the question-

In the rule (v1v2=322) we found that Pluto is complementary with Venus because

4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 2 = 322

But in the rule (v1v2 =1) we found Pluto is complementary with the moon because

0.406 mkm (Pluto Velocity Daily) x 2.4 mkm (The Moon Velocity Daily) = 1

The question asked – if the planets velocities are defined in pairs complementary each other and not individually how can the players be changed?

The answer tells – the planets velocities are rated by (0.8) based on the planets order means – the moon velocity daily 2.4 mkm = Venus velocity daily 3.024 mkm x 0.8

The rate (0.8) defines all planets velocities depend on each other by order-

Now let's see Planet velocity final definition– because- the definition uses three planets velocities together and not only two – let's put that clearly in following-

(iv) The Planet Velocity Final Definition

(A)

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 0.8 = 38 km/s (Venus velocity 35 km/s)

Venus moves per solar day 3.024 million km -But

1/3.024 = 0.3307 million km = Uranus moves per solar day 0.5875 million km /1.77

(note 1.77 = π^1/2) and (38 = 35 x 1.0725)

For that

47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity) x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 322

(B)

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 0.8 = 27.78 km/s (The Moon velocity)

The moon moves per solar day 2.4 million km -But

1/2.4 = 0.406 million km = Pluto moves per solar day 0.406 million km

For that

35 km/s (Venus velocity) x 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) x 2 = 322

(C)

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 0.8 = 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity)

Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km -But

1/2.082 = 0.4665 million km = Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km

For that

29.8 km/s (The Earth velocity) x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 2 = 322

(D)

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 0.8= 2 x 5.24km/s (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s error 3%)

Neptune moves per solar day 0.4665 million km - But

1/0.4665 = 2.082 million km = Mars moves per solar day 2.082 million km

For that

13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) x 24.1 km/s (Mars velocity) = 322

Shortly

Three planets velocities are defined in each equation- that tells the planet velocity definition is a process more complex than the simple equation (v1v2= constant)

Notice

The 9 planets velocities total is 176 km/s – if we add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) the total will be 205.8 km/s

The planets velocities are complementary also for this velocity 205.8 km/s – let's see

205.8 km/s = Mercury velocity (47.4 km/s) x Pluto velocity (4.7 km/s) / 1.0725

205.8 km/s = Venus velocity (35 km/s) x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 1.0725

205.8 km/s = Earth velocity (29.8 km/s) x Uranus velocity (6.8 km/s)

205.8 km/s = Jupiter velocity (13.1 km/s) x Neptune velocity (5.4 km/s) x 3

Mercury velocity = 2 Mars velocity by that Pluto will be used for Mars also

Max error (3%)

Please Note- Saturn is exceptional because

205.8 km/s = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 21.4

Where 21.4 hours = 2 x 10.7 hours (Saturn rotation period) -Means- the distance is passed by all planets motions in one hour equal the distance is passed by Saturn in 2 rotation periods (21.4 hours) that tells more analysis is required for Saturn velocity- as we should do later.

A QUESTION

(Why Is The Rate (0.8) Used To Define Each Planet Velocity Based On Its neighbor?) Kepler stated (Planet orbit defines its velocity) and

My planet orbital distance equation proves each planet orbit is defined based on its neighbor – means- my equation uses only 2 neighbor planets orbital distances

Here also-Planet velocity is defined based on its neighbor – means- this connection enabled Kepler to conclude his statement (Planet orbit defines its velocity)

But Why The Rate (0.8)??

The rate (0.8) is found by the energy reflection effect on Planets velocities definition, for that we analyze the energy reflection process deeply in the paper discussion

(v) Fourth Rule

5.9 x 0.8 = 4.7 km/s (Pluto velocity) BUT (5.9)^2 = 35 km/s (Venus velocity)

And

6.8 x 0.8 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) BUT (6.8)^2 = 47.4 km/s (Mercury velocity)

And

8.5 x 0.8 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) BUT (8.5)^2 = 2 x 35 km/s

And

12.12 x 0.8 = 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) BUT (12.12)^2 = 3 x 47.4 km/s And

16.4 x 0.8 = 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity) BUT (16.4)^2 = 9 x 29.8 km/s (Earth velocity)

Discussion

The data shows, the inner planets velocities are defined based on the outer planets velocities- that explains how the rules (v1v2=constant) is created

The data is produced by the reflection of energy and that shows why the planets velocities are reflected on each other-

(vi) Fifth Rule (Pluto Velocity Analysis)

DATA

4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) = 3/2 (π) km /s

And

5.4 km /s (Neptune velocity) x 4.7 km /s (Pluto velocity) = 8π

And

π x 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) = 4 x 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity)

And

4 x (4.7)^2 = 6.8 km/s (Uranus velocity) x 13.1 km/s (Jupiter velocity)

And

(4.7)^3 = 5.4 km/s (Neptune velocity) x 9.7 km/s (Saturn velocity) x 2 = (205.8/2)

205.8 = the 9 planets velocities total + the Earth moon velocity

Discussion

The data shows a real puzzle- because- Pluto velocity can't be defined simply by some simple rules –even the previous 4 rules can't define this velocity-

The data shows- The planet velocity is defined by very complex rule more strong than the previous 4 rules (Specifically Pluto velocity)

I want to say- the designer has a reason to define Pluto velocity by some complex system- the planets motions interactions causes this complex system-

The next data can explain better this meaning

More Data

13.1 km/s x 29.8 km/s x 142984 = 47.4 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 120536

13.1 km/s x 9.7 km/s x 142984 = 5.4 km/s x 27.8 km/s x 120536

9.7 km/s x 5.4 km/s x 142984 = 4.7 km/s x 13.1 km/s x 120536

13.1, 29.8, 47.4 km/s are the velocities of Jupiter, The Earth, Mercury respectively

9.7, 5.4, 27.8 km/s are the velocities of Saturn, Neptune, The Moon respectively

4.7 km/s = Pluto velocity

142984 km = Jupiter diameter and 120536 km = Saturn diameter

The data tells the planets velocities are defined by real complex system

(vii) Planet Orbital Inclination Definition

DATA

(Mercury velocity 47.4 km/s) = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s) x 7

(Mercury orbital inclination = 7 degrees)

(The Moon velocity 27.8 km/s) = (Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s) x 5.1

(The Moon orbital inclination = 5.1 degrees)

(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s) = (Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s) x 2.5

(Saturn orbital inclination = 2.5 degrees)

(Mars velocity 24.1 km/s) = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.9

(Mars orbital inclination = 1.9 degrees)

(Venus velocity 35 km/s) = (Jupiter velocity 13.1 km/s) x 1.3 x 2

(Jupiter orbital inclination = 1.3 degrees)

(Neptune velocity 5.4 km/s) = (Uranus velocity 6.8 km/s) x 0.8

(Uranus orbital inclination = 0.8 degrees)

(Saturn velocity 9.7 km/s) = (Neptune velocity 6.8 km/s) x 1.8

(Neptune orbital inclination = 1.8 degrees)

Discussion

The data shows that the planet orbital inclination is defined as a rate between two velocities- but- no clear rule is used by planet velocity - for example Mercury uses the rule (v1v2=constant because 47.4 x 6.8 = 322 and v1/v2= 47.4/6.8 = 7)

this rule is used almost for the inner planets- but- the outer planets orbital inclinations don't follow this rule- because Neptune is complementary with the Earth but Neptune velocity is used with Uranus and Saturn to define Uranus and Neptune orbital inclinations- means- the rule (v1/v2 = inclination) is used for the inner planets but the outer planets use another rate and almost their orbital inclinations are created based on the rate (v1/v2) defined by my planet diameter equation-

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

2 notes · View notes