#judicial corruption

[jangillman]

#new 'Activist' Judge John McConnell Who Ruled Against Trump On Federal Funding Freeze Faces Judicial Complaint Over Ties To NGO That Received Hundreds Of Millions

#RhodeIsland

Judge John McConnell, the federal judge blocking President Trump’s spending freeze spent decades on the board of a nonprofit that received $128M in taxpayer funds - and stands to gain millions of dollars from his ruling.

The Obama appointed judge joined the Crossroads Rhode Island Board of Directors in 2006. He served as Vice Chair in 2009–2010, Board Chair from 2011 to 2021, and remained a board member until early 2024. He is now f “Chair Emeritus”

America First Legal says McConnel's ties to the Non-profit is a conflict of interest and ethics violation and just filed a judicial complaint against Judge McConnell."

He should be JAILED AND DISBARRED!

[meandmybigmouth]

Scotus is not the only judicial level willing to protect Trump outside of their oath sworn to uphold the law!

[kinialohaguy]

Kennedy DESTROYS Dem Nominee for LYING Under Oath: 'This is Violation of Code of Ethics'

[tomorrowusa]

I'm sure that everybody is shocked...SHOCKED...that Donald Trump made a phone call to one of the most pro-MAGA SCOTUS justices just prior to his emergency appeal to delay sentencing in his 34 felony convictions in the Stormy Daniels hush money case.

Justice Alito famously used flags at his home and at his beach house to make pro-Trump statements. He's corrupt AF – which is another way to say he's as bad as Trump.

[waywardkestrel]

Judge Randall Sherman helped the University of California circumvent the actual state labor board to try to force an end to the grad student strike. The labor board turned the school down TWICE so they cherry picked a conservative asshole to do their dirty work. Fuck the UC, fuck that Zionist monster, free Palestine! And let's make sure that asshole never holds a bench again.

[musictrovert]

Trust me bro, Indian schools saw it coming, isiliye to itna essay writing ka practice karwaya

[originalleftist]

Trump's pet judge, Judge Cannon, has postponed the classified documents trial indefinitely.

[queeringhope]

And Chief (In)Justice John Roberts is lashing out against anyone but his petty Republican colleagues and himself for compromising the (clown) Court’s integrity. What a laugh. He missed his true calling as a comedian!

these are the days i remember why i love the internet hahaha 

[buletinnews]

Nilai Etika Profesi Hakim dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukum dan Tantangan Penegakan Moral

BuletinNews.com – Dalam kerangka filsafat hukum dan etika profesi, kedudukan hakim tidak hanya dilihat sebagai pelaksana hukum positif, tetapi sebagai aktor moral yang bertanggung jawab untuk menegakkan keadilan secara substantif. Hal ini sejalan dengan doktrin klasik dalam pemikiran hukum Romawi yang menyatakan quid leges sine moribus (apa arti hukum tanpa moral?) Dalam konteks ini, moralitas…

[rebuiltzine]

Maryland Codifies Child Custody Factors — But Will Anything Really Change?

By Michael Phillips In a move hailed by some as progress and by others as political theater, Maryland Governor Wes Moore has signed a bill into law that formally codifies the child custody factors judges are to “consider” when ruling on custody and visitation disputes. The legislation aims to bring clarity, consistency, and fairness to a system long criticized for its opacity and alleged bias.…

[jangillman]

Marjorie Taylor Green.....

Donald Trump’s Bail Bond: set at $454 Million and then reduced to $175 Million

Bionca Ellis’s Bail Bond: set at $5 Million while she smirks and giggles at butchering a 3 year old

Do you see how corrupt the Justice System is ?

[sergeant-macho-nacho]

@cryptotheism This hoe applauds that the court is in favour of violating Constitutional rights and when called out by me blocks me. You can block my account, but you can't deny the truth you beezey.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: David Shipley

Published: Mar 6, 2025

Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, has accused his Labour counterpart Shabana Mahmood of not believing in ‘equality under the law’ and ‘enshrining’ a ‘double standard’ over who is, and isn’t, sent to prison. The accusations against Mahmood – and the Labour government – came after new guidelines from the Sentencing Council were published, which appear to make prison less likely for ‘ethnic’, ‘cultural’ and ‘faith’ minorities who are convicted of crimes.

The Sentencing Council’s updated rules state that, for a number of groups, the assumption should be in favour of a pre-sentence report (PSR). Convicted people under 25, females, those from an ethnic cultural or faith minority, pregnant women or sole carers for children are all considered likely to be eligible to have a PSR, which can prove useful in making the case for why a person shouldn’t be locked up. Indeed, the government’s analysis shows that people who receive a detailed PSR are more likely to be spared jail. This shake-up appears to be driven by a belief that the justice system is disproportionately biased against ethnic and cultural minorities, and that guidelines should seek to remedy that.

The Justice Secretary responded to Jenrick’s accusation by insisting that: ‘I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law for anyone of any kind and there will never be a two-tier sentencing approach under my watch’.

The problem she faces is that the inevitable outcome of the Sentencing Council’s new guidance is that a white English person and an ethnic minority person convicted of the same crime are likely to face a different chance of being jailed. Indeed, that consequence is arguably the whole point of these changes.

The Sentencing Council appears to believe that our justice system is systemically racist, and that part of its job is to change that by weighting the scales in favour of those it believes are discriminated against. Even if Mahmood disagrees with that view, the Sentencing Council’s semi-autonomous status means the Justice Secretary is not able to direct the Council to change its rules. The danger of non-departmental public bodies, and other quangos, is that they drain power and control away from those who are supposed to exercise it on our behalf.

So what is the Sentencing Council and how are they able to change these rules? Established in 2010, at the very end of the last Labour government, the Council is a ‘non-departmental public body’, answerable to Parliament, but without ministerial control. The Council’s website states that it was created to ‘promote greater transparency and consistency in sentencing, while maintaining the independence of the judiciary’. This claim is hard to square with the Council’s next statement, that its ‘primary role’ is to ‘issue guidelines on sentencing, which the courts must follow unless it is in the interests of justice not to’.

The Council is comprised of eight judges, and six people with other experience of the criminal justice system (including an academic, a Chief Constable and the Director of Public Prosecutions). It has a number of ‘strategic goals’, including to ‘explore and consider issues of equality and diversity…and take any necessary action in response’,. It seems that goal has driven this week’s controversial announcement.

When I asked the Sentencing Council for comment about the reforms they said that it ‘identifies particular cohorts for whom evidence suggests PSRs might be of particular value to the court. The reasons for including groups vary but include evidence of disparities in sentencing outcomes, disadvantages faced within the criminal justice system and complexities in circumstances of individual offenders that can only be understood through an assessment.’

But there’s a danger here. A justice system which is perceived to be two-tier or biased against particular groups is one which may rapidly lose its legitimacy amongst those groups. That potential outcome would be particularly dangerous if the majority group in this country is the one which believes itself to be discriminated against.

Justice must be fair, and seen to be fair. Relying on unelected members of the legal profession and establishment to ensure that seems to have created a situation where the Justice Secretary should, on her own terms, reject this guidance. Will Labour challenge New Labour’s creation?

[ Via: https://archive.today/40fbH ]

==

So, basically, UK prisons will contain only straight, white British men.

This is not "justice." Justice is blind, not riddled with late-stage intersectional siphillis.

[victor0025]

Understanding the Surge in Gold Prices: Insights from a Judicial Adviser

The Economic Uncertainty Factor

1. Global Economic Instability

One of the primary reasons for the rise in gold prices is global economic uncertainty. Economic instability, often marked by fluctuating currencies, trade wars, and geopolitical tensions, drives investors towards safe-haven assets like gold. According to our judicial adviser, “Gold has historically been a refuge during times of economic turmoil. As uncertainties increase, so does the demand for gold, pushing its prices higher.”

2. Inflation Concerns

Inflation plays a crucial role in the value of currencies. When inflation rates rise, the purchasing power of money decreases. This scenario makes gold an attractive investment as it tends to retain value better than cash. Our expert states, “With inflation rates climbing in several major economies, investors are flocking to gold to preserve their wealth, thereby contributing to the rise in its price.”

The Influence of Monetary Policies

3. Low Interest Rates

Central banks around the world have adopted low-interest-rate policies to stimulate economic growth. While this can spur economic activity, it also lowers the returns on traditional savings accounts and bonds, making gold more appealing. “Low interest rates diminish the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like gold, leading to increased demand and higher prices,” explains the judicial adviser.

4. Quantitative Easing

Quantitative easing (QE), a policy used by central banks to inject money into the economy, can lead to currency devaluation. As more money circulates, the value of fiat currency can decrease, prompting investors to seek out assets that hold their value, such as gold. The judicial adviser notes, “The extensive use of QE in recent years has fueled fears of currency devaluation, pushing investors towards gold as a hedge.”

Geopolitical Tensions and Market Sentiment

5. Geopolitical Risks

Geopolitical tensions, such as conflicts, sanctions, and political instability, often result in increased gold prices. These events can disrupt markets and create uncertainty, making gold an attractive option for risk-averse investors. “Whenever there are geopolitical tensions, we observe a spike in gold prices as investors seek stability in their portfolios,” says our expert.

6. Market Sentiment

Supply and Demand Dynamics

7. Mining and Production

Gold prices are also influenced by supply-side factors such as mining production. Declining gold production or disruptions in the supply chain can lead to a decrease in the available supply of gold, driving prices up. “Any significant decrease in gold mining output can create supply shortages, contributing to higher prices,” notes the adviser.

8. Jewelry and Industrial Demand

The demand for gold in jewelry and industrial applications continues to rise, especially in emerging markets like India and China. This sustained demand puts additional upward pressure on gold prices. “Increases in consumer demand for gold jewelry and industrial uses, particularly in rapidly growing economies, are key factors pushing prices higher,” the judicial adviser adds.

Conclusion

The hike in gold prices is a complex interplay of economic, political, and market forces. From global economic instability and inflation concerns to monetary policies and geopolitical risks, multiple factors contribute to the rising value of gold. Insights from our judicial adviser underscore the importance of understanding these dynamics to make informed investment decisions.

[queeringhope]

Cannon is fodder for corruption:

“Cannon, whose oversight of the Donald Trump classified documents case has garnered widespread criticism, has repeatedly violated a rule requiring that federal judges disclose their attendance at private seminars.”

Cannon is not only INCOMPETENT but truly STUPID. She has repeatedly failed to follow the rules set for judges to file her actions.

PLEASE READ & POST THIS ARTICLE.

CANNON SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.