#meghan markle exploits children

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

These First Nation images are infuriating. MeGain still hasn't learned how to hold a child, and they strategically organized this non-Invictus PR engagement to capture photographs with TW exploiting other people's children in a desperate effort to make her seem "maternal."

Fortunately it always FAILS, but it doesn't change the fact that both Sparry & his wife are tragedy vultures. Other people's pain is their gain.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Lady C on Meghan's podcast with Jamie and her using the HRH title by u/wenfot

Lady C on Meghan's podcast with Jamie and her using the HRH title Lady C goes in, and I am here for it.***************Meghan Markle's propensity to boastfulness as she manoeuvres to ratify her status as a superior figure, is yet again thrown into sharp relief by her latest display while she determinedly disrespects protocols and agreements so flagrantly, albeit sneakily, that one cannot help but reflect that her conduct is indicative of sociopathic disregard for boundaries. With the aid of her saccharine acolyte Jamie Kern Lima -did anyone ever see two more sickly egotists blowing hot air through their respective orifices? - Markle has thrown down the gauntlet by displaying a basketful of commercial produce with the prominently exhibited banned message "With the Compliments of Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex ". This challenge is not only directed at the Royal Family and the institutions it exists to protect and uphold, but at the British people as well. Yet again, Meghan and her cabal of rackety cohorts provide us, the British people, with the proof of her contempt for us, for our national dignity, and for the rules, directives and agreements (including the Sandringham Agreement), which are in place to protect our institutions and prevent them from unseemly exploitation by cheap, vulgar hustlers as well as more sophisticated con artists and leeches. Meghan's banned With Compliments slip is as shameless as this faux royal's continuing and undignified moves to suck every bit of monetary juice out of her connection to the Royal Famiily. Not only has she now openly furthered herself and her commercial activities under the forbidden style of Her Royal Highness, but she also uses in a commercial context the princely coronet, which is not allowed either. It is noteworthy that once Diana, Princess of Wales lost the right to use the style Her Royal Highness, she was lady enough to substitute the princely coronet for that of an earl,which of course her father was. Not that she would ever have been crass and vulgar enough to exploit her status for commercial gain. One only needs to remember Harry saying, "Meghan is capable of anything", to appreciate the enormity of this hustler. The innocent, of whom I used to be one, might have thought he was merely referring to the personal talents for which she is renowned, but her subsequent and escalating flaunting of the conventions surrounding the commercialization of their royal status, which she acquired upon marriage, and which she was banned from using under the Sandringham Agreement, demonstrates with chilling clarity that she is indeed capable of anything, with the evident exception of respecting agreements, traditions, protocol, and the rights of others, including those of a whole nation whose dignity is defiled by her unseemly exploitation of a status to which she no longer has a right. But then who can be surprised by a woman who is milking her husband's status as well as his children, as if they were the teats of a cow, while she desperately tries to create commercial opportunities for herself which she hopes will fulfil her greedy lust for fame and fortune? post link: https://ift.tt/RY3ykr2 author: wenfot submitted: April 29, 2025 at 05:33PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[10bmnews]

Meghan Markle's 'tacky' business move sparks debate over royal family's privacy

Meghan Markle’s ‘tacky’ business move sparks debate over royal family’s privacy Meghan Markle has faced criticism for allegedly exploiting her children, Archie and Lilibet, to promote her latest business venture.  The Duchess of Sussex, 43, posted a rare photo with her kids on her As Ever brand’s Instagram account, tagging herself, before launching her online shop. As per the Sun, royal author…

[lavelled]

voted most lightly.

Kamala & Tim

Kamala Harris has soared in the race shakeup. Whether skillfully debating taunts and personal attacks, advocating for fundamental freedoms and justice for all people, especially women, or at home with her family, Kamala gives America’s place on the world stage the authenticity and intelligible policy positions we need. She has the vitality to blaze a trail for brighter days. I will be casting my vote for Kamala and Tim in the 2024 Presidential Election.

Pretentious Ambition

Meg is reworking something: She hates Harry. When did she realize she was used for wombed monetization, when he paid her? Was it at the Women’s Empowerment Reception at the Royal Aeronautical Society, Royal Ascot races, Polo Club matches, Wimbledon matches, movie premieres, concerts, Netflix miniseries, Bondi Beach, Australian Geographic Society Awards, a speech on women’s suffrage in New Zealand, British Ambassador’s Residence Party, at the Kennedy Human Rights Awards, her Archewell Audio Podcasts, her published father-and-son children’s book, Gloria Steinem chat, 2018 British Fashion Awards, King of Morocco meeting, baby shower at The Mark Penthouse in New York, visiting the site where 19-year-old student, Uyinene Mrwetyana, was raped and murdered when she picked up a box at the post office in Cape Town, which, as FedEx actress, must’ve been improv theatre, at the Mountbatten Festival of Music, kissing Harry in Colombia then big geographical avoidance, wheelchair exploitation, grandad lies, amusing dog tags, jarring teen and tween products or her standby tiara wedding?

Years ago, a YouTube video of silk: Inside the Suits’ fashion closet with actress, Meghan Markle.

The physical task is her pomposity. Must be before any regal training. At 1:07, she displays the rooted Californian “quintessential” and then fucked him:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWZonwIYmMI

Cohorts of Commonplace

Little fictionalization of a swoony royal wedding that hinted at groundedness. America hated it. 2018 shootings: May 16, 2018, Justin Painter shot his three young children in Ponder, Texas. May 20, 2018 one man was killed in Hazlehurst, Mississippi. June 10, four people were shot outside a graduation party in Kannapolis, NC. On June 14, a 15-year-old was shot in Tracy, California. June 24, one man shot in the back in Gary, Indiana. July 4, three people killed in Gary, Indiana. July 10, 2018, a father killed his three young children in Prices Corner, Delaware. August 12, 2018, a father shot his three children in Clearlake, California. October 8, teen was shot and killed in Española, New Mexico. December 28, 2018, boyfriend killed his girlfriend, her young children, and her mother in Saint Charles, Missouri.

Mosque Morgue

March 15, 2019, Brenton Harrison Tarrant murdered 51 worshippers, injuring 89 in Christchurch, NZ. The Al Noor Mosque and the Linwood Islamic Centre. Youngest victim was three years old. Inspired by these mosque shootings, on August 10, 2019, Philip Manshaus, a 21-year-old Norwegian man, shot and killed his teenage sister while she was in her bed, firing three bullets into her head and one into her chest, then opened fire at the Al-Noor Islamic Centre in Norway.

Aqua

On Twitter mouthparts, Harry is Oasis musician, Liam Gallagher. He uses a faux accent that is technically British to compose a blend of tipsy, thorny, anger-fueled noise. They’re crass to me and then you remember he’s married:

Fuck me i think I've just done my first SLUT DROP c'mon.

Just had RKID on the phone begging for forgiveness bless him wants to meet up what Dya reckon meet up or fuck him off.

blimey green pedophilia. google.

Divorce

The youngest suicide on record was incorrect: In 2017, Gabriel Taye at Carson Elementary, with a necktie, hanged himself. He was 8. The youngest was Samantha Nicole Kuberski who hanged herself with a belt from a crib back in 2009. She was 6.

Jayden Lalchan of Princes Town, Trinidad, 15, just hanged himself. On October 7, 20-year-old Rani Pradhan set herself on fire, dying at MKCG Medical College & Hospital in Odisha, India.

Staged marriage, long-distance divorce.

K

[parodyroyalle]

Quora Question:

Is Meghan Markle a bully, or is she bullied?

A whopping TEN of Meghan’s Royal staff came foreward this year, saying Meghan’s abusive behavior was “sociopathic”.

Comments:

Markle USA

Her college sorority sister said she bullied girls for fun, her family called her a bully and a narcissist, her co workers said she would scream and threaten people to get what she wanted, and her staff called her a “living nightmare”.

Meghan is a bully. Just ask her sorority sisters, her co workers, her associates, her staff, her firmer friends, her family and the Royal Family.

Meghan is a bully. No wonder the UK hates her.

Jill Selwood · Rachel Meghan Markle USA

She’s the biggest bully around and has been since she was a teen. She glued a school mates eyelids together with super glue!!! Who does that? A big bully. The people who worked with her for the Reitman clothing shoot refused to work with her again as she was so awful.

Markle Canada

A documented history of Bullying. It is no surprise the heading reads: A whopping TEN of Meghan’s Royal staff came forward this year, saying Meghan’s abusive behavior was “sociopathic”.

A history of bullying Children and Adults regardless of race or creed. From little Princess Charlotte at only 3 years old. Palace Staff, Co Worker and Sorority Sisters reports a long history of cruel and unethical superior and “sociopathic “ pattern of behaviour.

There are reports of bullying of a young Toronto woman in a calculated smear campaign including visiting for an unauthorized tour of the Downtown Fundraising Office.

Markle’s Public Figure friend with affiliation to the World Vision Creative Artist Program openly offering a young Toronto Creative Activist who is a former Miss Universe Canada Delegate on a live video on social media which is perceived as Human Trafficking.

Human Trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of people through force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them for profit. Men, women and children of all ages and from all backgrounds can become victims of this crime, which occurs in every region of the world. Human-Trafficking - UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 

Markle can be viewed doing an Interview with the Public Figure at Soho before any engagement into the British Royal Family where Markle presented herself as a “Humanitarian”.

Palace staff report a continue history of Bullying as Page Six reports Palace staff members sticking to claims they were bullied by Ms. Rachel Meghan Markle. Is Meghan Markle a bully, or is she bullied? 

I would conclude that she is in fact a Bully and agree with that the pattern of abusive behavior is “sociopathic”.

Google Source: Bullying and International Human Rights.

FACT: Did You Know ...

Reddit Forum:

Never Forget Markle Bullied A 3 Year Old Child.

www.reddit.com/r/SaintMeghanMarkle/comments/16brluj/never_forget_meghan_markle_bullied_a_3_year_old

Who was the Child identified as allegedly bullied by Markle ?

Princess Charlotte

“I don't believe Kate is racist. Is she a mean girl? Yes. Was she behind the smear campaign against Meghan? Yes. She hated Meghan from the get-go, but that had nothing to do with racism. Meghan being biracial just added fuel to the fire, and Kate jumped on the bandwagon. If Meghan were a 100% Caucasian woman, Kate still would have leaked the story that she made her cry, but now that the new allegations have come that Kate is indeed the racist who has concerns about Prince Archie's skin colour, this whole theory goes down the drain, and yes, Kate is a racist.” - Submitted by Anonymous

[heir-less]

I am reading one of the most tone-deaf and pointless articles from that Women of Windsor blog. I've never thought this person was bad or a tinhat or anything of the sort, but wow, is this article one of the most needlessly self-pitying things for no reason. Please read the article first and then continue to see my thoughts on it below and how it represents the childish worldview most royal watchers maintain.

Throughout the article, the author complains about people bringing up justifiable criticisms of the British Royal Family because it's spoiling the enjoyment she has from royal-watching, something she does for a fun "escape".

When she started speaking about how she royal watches to "escape reality" she reminded me of myself when I was 14 and just wanted to turn off my brain and watch Kate wear the pretty dresses and the sparkly tiaras without thinking about the border social and political implications of having princesses and princes. That's fine if you like The Pretty Dress, I still like talking about The Pretty Dress, but your own personal enjoyment of The Pretty Dress does not compensate for the inherent social and economic inequities that monarchies perpetuate. If you find that discussing these topics is spoiling your enjoyment, you probably understand that this is the case but you're in denial. So, you blame the people brining up these issues instead of getting upset at the issues themselves.

Frankly, I think this is inane and reveals how very privileged the writer is that they have the luxury to even view the royals outside of their historical and political context to begin with. As a Black person, my enjoyment of royalty as "an escape" and The Pretty Dresses ended the moment Meghan Markle entered the family. Take a guess as to why that is? How do you think it felt to be a Black teenager/young woman having to watch how Meghan was treated, and realizing that the people you followed for so long would condone racism so long as it was convenient for them? That they were basically okay with the dehumanization of people that looked like you?

I can't "escape" that type of prejudice through royal watching, because it is inherent to the system.

The writer also does this fucking bullshit that all dishonest monarchists do where they act as if people in the Caribbean liking The Queen means that colonialism isn't a literal historical fact. It is so exhausting, personally, for me to keep repeating that it doesn't matter. You cannot "both sides" the colonial legacy of the royal family. It's like trying to "both sides" COVID-19. Finding a group of Jamaican people who like Will and Kate or shook their hands does not mean that Britain did not spend the pervious 250 years exploiting Jamaica for profit. Ultimately, the issues are still there and they still need to be addressed which is something the monarchy has consistently failed at, to the point where countries like Jamaica would rather remove the Queen as their head of state. While believing that removing the Queen is for the best is an opinion, the British Empire's harm to the Indigenous populations of their former colonies is not. It is a fact. Stop conflating these two things.

I think I'm just now coming to the understanding that most royal watchers are children who are too immature to grapple with anything of substance or political weight. They just want to view the royals as comfort food, which is all fine and dandy until they begin to minimize the inequalities these institutions perpetuate. It's just very annoying that we've been having these conversations for over three years and people still haven't learned anything.

[ingek73]

Sykes: The Sussexes would never make their kids swelter in a suit like Prince George

July 12, 2022

By Kaiser

It’s happening with some frequency in a quiet way, but royal commentators and “royal experts” are actually starting to show respect to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, especially with regards to how Archie and Lilibet are kept out of the spotlight. It really started happening during the Jubbly, when the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge overemphasized the importance of *their* children and felt the need to include all three kids in too many events. Which led to an overtired, sugar-rushed Prince Louis throwing a huge tantrum front-row of the Jubbly parade, not to mention all of the fuss he made on the balcony. Suddenly, the comparison between the Cambridges and Sussexes turned in Harry and Meghan’s favor. The royal reporters were like: say what you will about the Sussexes, but at least they don’t overexpose their kids. It was especially funny because William and Kate made a huge fuss about how their children should be the only ones on the balcony, the only ones emphasized during the Jubbly, etc. It blew up in their faces.

Well, on Sunday, William and Kate brought little George to the Wimbledon men’s final. My choice would have been different – I think Kate should have brought George and Charlotte to the men’s final and women’s final. But Kate and William like to emphasize that George is “special,” that he’s the heir, so George was the only kid in the Royal Box and his mom made him wear a stuffy suit during a heat wave. Which led to the Daily Beast’s Royalist column to write: “Prince George Sweltering in a Suit Is All the Justification Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Will Ever Need.” Ouch.

Sunday was the hottest day of the year in the U.K., with the BBC reporting at one stage that the temperature at Wimbledon’s centre court had reached 95 F and was expected to get as high as 104 F. Yet despite the ice-cream melting conditions, Prince William and Kate Middleton shoehorned their eldest son into a dark two-piece suit and tie for his first ever visit to the legendary tennis championship in southwest London.

Although a reporter for the Sun overheard Prince George telling his dad it was “too hot,” the impeccably behaved young prince barely showed a hint of boredom or restlessness for the entire four hours he was courtside and on show. For that he, and his parents, undoubtedly deserve great credit.

Yet despite his astonishingly mature conduct, and the no-doubt tireless efforts of his mother, who at the end of the whole thing then had to go and hand out trophies to winner Novak Djokovic and runner-up Nick Kyrgios, to many observers the notion of dressing George up in a suit and tie was a reminder of the absurd and Victorian demands that the institution places on the Windsor children. Turning them into glorified, suited show ponies at the most tender of ages, for example, seems to be hardwired into the palace’s DNA.

The contrast with Harry and Meghan could not be more pronounced. Last week, for example, pictures emerged of the couple at a Fourth of July parade where a snatched photograph of Archie showed the toddler wearing light, baggy jeans, a long cotton shirt, and a baseball hat to keep the sun off.

One can, of course, only imagine Harry and Meghan’s reaction to George apparently cosplaying as his father if they tuned in to watch the Wimbledon final Sunday. One assumes their response would be located, approximately, in the intersection of one of those Venn diagrams with three circular sets, the circles entitled, 1: “FFS,” 2: “What is wrong with those people?” and, 3: “Thank God we got out.”

Harry and Meghan have been explicit since leaving the royal family that they were motivated in large part to protect their children. Whilst many assumed at the time that this meant protect them from press intrusion, it has always been something of an open secret that a significant part of the whole mechanism of royalty is reliant on exploiting the adorable kids.

…Another way of seeing an 8-year-old dressed like a politician on the campaign trail is to be reminded of what Harry said about his brother and father in his and Meghan’s bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey. “I was trapped, but I didn’t know I was trapped,” Harry told Winfrey, “Trapped within the system, like the rest of my family are. My father and my brother, they are trapped. They don’t get to leave. And I have huge compassion for that.”

[From The Daily Beast]

“It has always been something of an open secret that a significant part of the whole mechanism of royalty is reliant on exploiting the adorable kids…” One might even say that it is a significant part of the invisible contract and the “business model” of royalty of which Harry wanted no part. The thing that bugs me about the Cambridge kids and their parents is that William and Kate want it both ways – their PR is that they’re raising their children “to be normal” and that their household has middle-class values and they just want their kids to be kids and not part of the royal machinery yet… and then they also use the kids as human shields and bring them out to events where it’s increasingly inappropriate.

With the Wimbledon men’s final in particular… like, some of those men’s matches can go on for four or five hours. That’s a really long time for an eight-year-old kid (clad in a heavy suit and no sunglasses) to be baking in the sun. Is giving your child heatstroke some kind of royal rite of passage or something? Just be sensible as parents, but it seems like Will and Kate cannot. I also think Kate and William had made the plan weeks ago to bring George to the final and they simply didn’t care about the heat on that day. Kate had already planned out his outfit and, as we’ve seen so often, Early Years Expert Kate was incapable of improvising or being sensible about when her kids deserve a break.

[the-empress-7]

I get the impression that William will now on insert himself in every Charles related decision/meeting regarding the future and specifaclly the ginger. With Philip's passing and William's leadership/distance vibes I got from the funeral (and that megxit last engagment when K and W ignored the duo) I feel hopeful that he thinks about his children and legacy and won't let anyone, not even his loving guilt ridden father ruin that or let him get exploited no longer.

It pisses me off but I got to say, Kate politely talking to him is brilliant. Directing him towards William was great. Walking together but not really letting them have the money shot is fantastic. I won't be that mad even if Charles will walk with him. Because they think about the future of the family and part of it is deflecting lies from Markle by showing the real story bts when she's not included. Nothing can beat actual proofs or real life kindness. It doesn't do much harm because Harry will already get some jobs and is linked to the family and she is blocked from them so it's kinda a win for them as long as they don't go blindly supporting him and inviting her to the UK which I doubt they will tbh.Oprah is already posting about how the trio is back together which is kinda hilarious because that interview was only a month ago and there's no mention of her dear meghan... And in any case, him going back to her and a week from now trashing his family again or she'll do another interview will backfire like crazy.

As much as i'm angry they even let H be around them I have faith in William. And I need to reminde myself that they are dealing with a lost weak sad brother that got trapped with a woman that is hell bent on destroying his and theirs lives- it's easy for us to judge but they have to act carefully. And they still love him i'm sure. So..again I have faith in Willam and his love of his children's future

Showing him basic respect and not giving them comparison attempts to D ("look how theh treat him like they did to his mother") is the right move and will kill future manipulations by her - so now any attack from her or him in the next few months will backfire.

Thanks anon, I too have faith in William. 

The gulf between Harry’s new life and his old life widens and deepens with each passing day. If anything, this week served as a loud reminder of exactly what he has left behind. When he shows up back in California and shilling for betterwhatever it’s going to be jarring. 

[queen-susans-revenge]

Welcome to today's episode of Fern Yells At the News!

It's all about the royals of course, because the other news is depressing.

Okay, let's start here. FIRSTLY: You assholes don't know whether Harry and Meghan were invited or not. They have a brand new baby, they weren't going to fly across country for a big party anyway.

SECONDLY: "Team Queen"??? Hahahahaha oh my god you absolute bootlickers, the Queen does not like the Obamas better than she likes her own grandson. Insofar as she is capable of human emotion, I mean. If there is a Team Queen then Harry is on it, although considering the other players (see: Andrew), it's not exactly an honor.

THIRDLY: Humiliation. That is what this faction of the media desperately wants. To see Harry exiled, stripped of titles, tarred and feathered and carried through the town square. All for the unforgivable crime of marrying a mixed-race feminist and subsequently refusing to renounce her, despite the fact that she resolutely (and rudely, in their eyes) remained Black even after the wedding. They HATE to see Harry and Meghan thriving in California because by their very existence that family challenges everything about blood purity and caste, everything the racist Royal Rota hold dear.

SADLY FOR THEM, we Americans are going to continue to shower our Cali prince & princess with love and money. Which leads to a lot of wistful headlines in the UK tabloids about "is Harry losing popularity in America? Maybe now? Maybe today? We said it last month and the month before that and it was never true but maybe if we say it AGAIN we can MAKE it true! Look, they weren't at Obama's birthday party! THE AMERICANS ARE TURNING ON HARRY!"

We are not. Thanks for asking. You can't have your prince back because we are keeping him. Haha you.

Oh God the Markles, okay.

I'm tempted to call them fair game for tabloid fodder, because they are terrible and attention-seeking. Meghan strenuously does not feel that they should be fair game. And of course it sucks for her--this is probably the worst part of the princess gig, all the money that the press will go around handing people to say bad things about you. Remember when they outright offered one of her former costars $70K to lie and say he'd had an affair with her?

The smear campaign against Meghan is calculated, it is orchestrated, it has big money behind it, it has been going on for years, and it has captured the Markles as abjectly willing pawns. Samantha and Thomas Jr. have obviously been seething with jealousy against Meghan since her birth and will quite happily lap up cash to broadcast their spite. When their father married Doria, Samantha called her "the maid," which tells you just about everything about where their hatred for Meghan comes from.

What gets me is the entitlement. Thomas Jr. published a letter telling Harry not to marry Meghan...and he has the unmitigated stupidity to be surprised that he wasn't invited to the wedding! Same with Samantha! She feels that she's owed a big princess to-do because her sister got one, and really it isn't fair that there's no prince whisking her off to a palace, just like all her life it hasn't been fair that Meghan is prettier and smarter and nicer and everyone likes her better. It's hard not to feel a little bit bad for Samantha especially considering her health problems, but on the other hand she is genuinely terrible--again, "the maid"--and has alienated everyone including her own children, so.

Thomas Sr. is a sadder case because Meghan really tried to keep her father in her life. But he lied to her, and lied about her (among other things he claimed she'd never given him money, a claim which court proceedings later proved false). He betrayed her trust again and again. And he's continuing to wage a public blackmail campaign against her. So even if she wanted to, which I'm sure at this point she doesn't, it would be impossible for her to resume contact with Blackmail Dad.

I mean, blackmail is exactly what he's doing and he's being extremely open about it. "If after this interview, if I don’t hear from somebody in 30 days, I’ll give 30 days and I’m going to try again...It's time to look after Daddy."

Amazingly, "it's time to look after Daddy" is not even the grossest thing Thomas Markle has ever said. For my money the grossest thing was "Everything that Meghan is, I made her."

That right there. That is the level of entitlement the Markles feel, apparently have always felt, about Meghan. They feel that they own her. They feel that she has no identity outside them. They take one hundred percent of the credit for each and every one of her accomplishments and they categorically deny her any agency, any self-determination, any credit for her own life.

I honestly think this is an abusive thing to say. ANY time anyone says "I made you everything you are," they are hoping to exploit or abuse you. It's the reddest of red flags. It means they don't even see you as a person. For Thomas to say this about his own daughter is gross and it's so revealing of everything Meghan must have endured in that household. It's impossible for her to have a relationship with someone who asserts that level of control and entitlement to her life and her person. Especially not while they are also doing everything in their power to harm her.

I comfort myself, as I always do, with the knowledge that Meghan is sitting very comfortably indeed. The Markles can't actually touch her. They will never see her again except on a TV screen and magazine covers. They will not get a penny from the royal family. That phone call Thomas is waiting for will never come. Shove your roses up your ass, big guy.

THIS ONE THOUGH. I only have one comment on this one and it's "lol"

[helshades]

I didn't even know meghan markle was mixed, I thought she was just a white person with black hair

Before that whole debacle, I assumed she had vague perhaps-Black ancestry and left it at that. She is a beautiful young woman with a perfect physique who starred in a popular show with some success and was in no danger of getting homeless, especially considering that her father was an acclaimed director of photography for television and cinema, that she had quite the privileged education, that at some point she married a producer who got her some roles... That woman has no place on the anti-discrimination poster, frankly. She is extremely rich, married to a scandalously rich man, they are famous and will never struggle to find paying gigs, their children will only have to be heirs to them and they'll be fine their whole lives. Fuck those people and fuck Americans who think it's peak social justice when self-entitled millionaires whine about poor people they wanted to exploit not being woke enough to let them. Fuck. Them.

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

Sussex Titles

Lady Colin Campbell's Tweet

"Meghan Markle's propensity to boastfulness as she manoeuvres to ratify her status as a superior figure, is yet again thrown into sharp relief by her latest display while she determinedly disrespects protocols and agreements so flagrantly, albeit sneakily, that one cannot help but reflect that her conduct is indicative of sociopathic disregard for boundaries.

With the aid of her saccharine acolyte Jamie Kern Lima -did anyone ever see two more sickly egotists blowing hot air through their respective orifices? - Markle has thrown down the gauntlet by displaying a basketful of commercial produce with the prominently exhibited banned message "With the Compliments of Her Royal Highness The Duchess of Sussex ".

This challenge is not only directed at the Royal Family and the institutions it exists to protect and uphold, but at the British people as well. Yet again, Meghan and her cabal of rackety cohorts provide us, the British people, with the proof of her contempt for us, for our national dignity, and for the rules, directives and agreements (including the Sandringham Agreement), which are in place to protect our institutions and prevent them from unseemly exploitation by cheap, vulgar hustlers as well as more sophisticated con artists and leeches.

Meghan's banned With Compliments slip is as shameless as this faux royal's continuing and undignified moves to suck every bit of monetary juice out of her connection to the Royal Famiily. Not only has she now openly furthered herself and her commercial activities under the forbidden style of Her Royal Highness, but she also uses in a commercial context the princely coronet, which is not allowed either.

It is noteworthy that once Diana, Princess of Wales lost the right to use the style Her Royal Highness, she was lady enough to substitute the princely coronet for that of an earl,which of course her father was. Not that she would ever have been crass and vulgar enough to exploit her status for commercial gain. One only needs to remember Harry saying, "Meghan is capable of anything", to appreciate the enormity of this hustler.

The innocent, of whom I used to be one, might have thought he was merely referring to the personal talents for which she is renowned, but her subsequent and escalating flaunting of the conventions surrounding the commercialization of their royal status, which she acquired upon marriage, and which she was banned from using under the Sandringham Agreement, demonstrates with chilling clarity that she is indeed capable of anything, with the evident exception of respecting agreements, traditions, protocol, and the rights of others, including those of a whole nation whose dignity is defiled by her unseemly exploitation of a status to which she no longer has a right.

But then who can be surprised by a woman who is milking her husband's status as well as his children, as if they were the teats of a cow, while she desperately tries to create commercial opportunities for herself which she hopes will fulfil her greedy lust for fame and fortune?"

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Meanwhile Princes Catherine Walks the Walk by u/Lil-Mismuffet

Meanwhile, Princes Catherine Walks the Walk There can't be a sane soul who isn't revulsed by Meghan Markle's hypocrisy. She preaches about internet safety for children ... "created" the Parents' Network ... and exploited grieving parents of children who took their own lives. It goes without saying that there many examples of her pretense.Meanwhile, Princess Catherine's early childhood initiative is making huge strides:https://ift.tt/NZ6KmfS post link: https://ift.tt/sjELqDS author: Lil-Mismuffet submitted: May 20, 2025 at 02:02PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[royal-confessions]

“The fact that Thomas Markle realesed some many private pictures and information about her daughter just for some money, as well all of his children and meghan markle left BRF herself break through in Hollywood, it's says that this family is OBSESSED with money and attention. ALL OF THEM. But they have no idea how to make it, so they exploit the people they have around.. “ - Submitted by Anonymous

[justmythots8]

Meghan Money-Maker Markle

It’s been a long week. I think we can all “collectively” agree that Smegs has given us a run for our money. Who can keep track anymore? But that was her plan all along, wasn’t it? Distract us with her incessant, infantile demands, while single-handedly “modernizing the Monarchy”. Right.

I apologize in advance, as this is really just one big rant about Meghan Markle.

The problem is, modernizing the Monarchy means something different to Meghan, than it does to you & I. To Meghan, modernizing the Monarchy means being able to be celebrities, and live lavish celebrity lifestyles. It also includes being able to earn profits, which totals currently are not permitted to do. There’s no need. That is why their lifestyles are paid for by the public purse.

But that wasn’t enough for Meghan. She insisted on merching her wardrobe, her child’s wardrobe, and everything in between. Make no mistake, celebs make the majority of their money from sponsorships. It’s a big deal. When you see George Clooney endorsing Nespresso machines, know that he is being paid boku bucks to do so.

This is what Meghan desires. She wants her face plastered across every product she can get her hands on. Those carefully curated Instagram posts by celebs such as Kim Kardashian, promoting other products earns them minimum $300,000 - 500,000 per post. Now you know why Meghan fought hard for her own Instagram and her own “foundation”.

This is also why Meghan chose the model of following a different set of “charities” each month. She’s being paid to promote said charities. And actual public appearances garner her even more than that. Why do you think she recurved a $3,000,000 check from Disney at the Lion King premiere? They’re Rent-a-royals, essentially. Did you really think she was doing all this for free?

I am all about exposing Meghan & Harry for the selfish, self-promoting, money-grabbing frauds that they are (my opinion of course). I happened to come across a user submission over in Skippy’s blog claiming that during the Sussex’s engagement, Meghan was actually caught taking photographs of restricted areas of the palace, with the intent to sell them for an obscene amount of money. Can she be anymore of a grifter?

I mean, the nerve of this woman; She’s fresh on the scene, newly engaged to a literal Prince, and all of her hopes & dreams are about to come to fruition, and it’s still not enough for her... she needs to covertly take & sell photographs of things she has no business photographing. It’s disgusting.

She could have put multiple members’ lives at risk in doing so, including Will & Kate’s children! Thank god Prince Charles caught her before she could inflict any damage. What I’m curious to know is why, after that incident, did Harry go through with the wedding? If you find your bride-to-be trying to exploit your family in the name of money, how do you over-look that & carry on as if nothing happened?

It’s the million dollar question, though. As Meghan gave off many red flags prior to the wedding. More than enough for Harry to bolt, that’s for sure. So why didn’t he? I’m really interested in getting to the bottom of that question. Why did Harry marry this woman, and what is her agenda? I’ve speculated anything from blackmail to Meghan being a CIA asset. And quite honestly, the more absurd theories tend to make the most sense, if you can believe it.

The CIA has long utilized beautiful women for their international operations. They want people who blend in, who you’d least expect. And I think Meghan fits that description. I mean, who would really believe that a woman, with a background like hers, who is as uneducated & unprofessional as she is, think that she has ties to the CIA? I certainly would never suspect it if I weren’t actually keepin up with her shenanigans.

Meghan’s background in international studies & her brief work with the UN, and her globe trotting 20’s also fits the pre-requisites for CIA as well. If you find yourself still shaking your head “No, that can’t be possible”, then that’s exactly the type of person the CIA wants. Someone you’d least expect. They’ve done their job. That’s what they want you to think, so it makes one curious, at the very least.

But what is their goal, if that’s the case? One hypothetical I’ve thought long & hard about is Meghan’s & Archie’s soon-to-be dual citizenship, and also Harry’s potential to apply for a green card. The lens suddenly starts to come into focus; their agenda is the US, and who knows how deep this really goes.

She’s said it herself; The US tabloids were Meghan’s main concern. Not the UK press. Shes more interested in her image here in the states, than in Britain. Reporters have come out of the woodwork & said Meghan told them so herself. The problem is, the US press has caught on to Meghan’s scheme, and they are not giving her the global recognition she thinks she deserves.

The US dislikes her just as much, if not more, than the UK ... for a couple of reasons; Namely, she’s an embarrassment to us. She represents the worst parts of our culture, and is not a true representation of America. We want her out of the palace too.

She openly disrespects our president, her president, and cares only about number one. Her narcissistic & psychopathic tendencies do represent the essence of the Hollywood elite, but not the rest of our country.

They have collectively been nicknamed “The swamp”, and for good reason. It is not an honor, nor a privilege to be a part of such a cult-ish, sick & twisted group.

I don’t know why Meghan craves so much to be a part of it. But one things for certain; She needs to be forcefully removed from the royal family, before she does any more irreversible damage.

Respectfully, the clock is ticking, Your Majesty.

[ingek73]

Fairytales for fuckwits: Meghan, a children's book, and the school bully tactics of the British tabloids...

Piers Morgan's obsession with Meghan Markle continues, while Mike Graham appears worried there may be too many big words for him to understand.

Mic Wright

May 6

On May the 4th, there was a great disturbance in the force, as if thousands of tabloid reporters and talk radio pundits cried out at once: The Duchess of Sussex had announced she was writing a children’s book.

Since the earth-shattering news that Meghan has written a story about the relationship between father’s and their sons — apparently based on a poem she wrote for Prince Harry — the tabloid press and talk radio stations have gone into meltdown.

The Sun has managed to crank out seven hysterically-pitched stories on the announcement since it dropped — the book isn’t out until June 8th — with each more unhinged than the last:

MEG TO PAPER Meghan Markle writes children’s book inspired by Prince Harry and baby Archie about ‘bond between father and son’

MEG-A MOVE Meghan Markle’s first priority should be mending broken relationships with royals not writing kids’ book, expert claims

SOUNDS A BIT WOODEN ‘Schmaltzy’ Meghan Markle ‘on dodgy ground’ with kids’ book celebrating fathers ‘after own bust-up with dad’ says author

DOUBLE DUCH Meghan Markle accused of copying her kids’ book The Bench from another story – but author defends her

NOT WRITE Piers Morgan slams ‘hypocrite’ Meghan Markle for kids’ book on ‘father-son bond’ after ‘ruining Harry and Charles’ ties’

'RIDICULOUS' Meghan Markle using Duchess of Sussex as author name ‘laughable’ after she wanted to cut Royal ties, says royal expert

CUT PRICE Meghan Markle’s kids’ book has price slashed already at Amazon and Waterstones

You’ll notice that Piers Morgan — a man who has turned one drink with Meghan after which he claims she “ghosted him”, which took place in 2016, into a five year and counting obsession — gets his own story there. That’s The Sun filleting Morgan’s spittle-flecked Daily Mail column on the book for its own news piece.

Morgan, who trails his columns on Twitter like they are exciting new releases rather than the tabloid equivalent of a letter scrawled in faeces forced through your letterbox, dashed out his thoughts on The Bench with the indecent haste of a man running along while his trousers fall down.

Image description: “Twitter avatar for @BreeNewsome

DEFUND & ABOLISH POLICE, REFUND OUR COMMUNITIES

@BreeNewsome

Piers Morgan’s obsession with Meghan Markle is genuinely disturbing. He’s really just using the guise of journalism to be a public stalker and harasser.

May 5th 2021

1,414 Retweets10,252 Likes”

-

Beneath a typically screaming Mail headline — How the hell can Meghan 'I hate royalty but call me Duchess' Markle preach about father-child relationships when she's disowned her own Dad, and wrecked her husband's relationship with his? — Morgan howled:

… she continues to cynically exploit her royal titles because she knows that's the only reason anyone is paying her vast sums of money to spew her uniquely unctuous brand of pious hectoring gibberish in Netflix documentaries, Spotify podcasts or children's books.

Of course, her equally cynical publishers don't give a damn about any of this shocking double standard.

Forget the fact that Meghan had a good degree of personal fame before she ever met Prince Harry, Piers Morgan accusing anyone else of being a cynical fame chaser is beyond parody. From his earliest days as a gossip hack, Morgan has muscled into pictures with the rich and famous, desperate to be someone.

When Meghan was willing to indulge him, he showered her with praise, but once she stopped taking his calls, he turned into the Tinder match from hell. That he has been married to his second wife, fellow controversialist columnist Celia Walden since 2010 seemingly did nothing to dampen his obsession.

Having repeatedly interviewed Meghan’s estranged father Thomas Markle — another man aggrieved because a woman would rather not spend time with him — Morgan sneers:

If she really cared about father-child relationships, she'd take a chauffeur-driven limousine on the hour-long trip to see her own father who's never even met either Harry or Archie.

It’s projection again: Piers Morgan’s ego is so egg-shell thin that after Meghan decided that one drink was more than enough, he’s spent 5 years seeking revenge and convinced that he’s been wronged, just like her ‘poor old dad’. That’s the ‘poor old dad’ that insists on talking about his daughter to journalists at every possible occasion.

At the end of an article that implies Harry and Meghan contributed to the death of Prince Philip — he died of natural causes — and rants on about “the woke”, Morgan ends with this:

But then as we've seen from her gruesomely self-interested behaviour during a pandemic that's caused so much devastation and pain to billions around the world, Meghan Markle doesn't really care about anyone but herself.

Remember, the Duchess of Sussex’s only ‘crime’ here is to write a children’s book which people will be free to buy or ignore with equal ease. But, as ever, Piers Morgan treats the news with all the proportionality of a US drone strike.

The real story here is about how Morgan — the bittiest of bit-part players in the narrative of Meghan and Harry’s lives — is so desperate to upgrade his place in the cast list that he will rant and rave to stay relevant. His departure from Good Morning Britain came after his last stream of invective about Meghan and he knows this schtick gets him the attention and money he craves.

Image description: “Twitter avatar for @MariaLRoach

Maria Roach

@MariaLRoach

Meghan Markle inside the tiny space called Piers Morgan’s head. #duchessofsussex Tap Dance GIF by Miss America

May 5th 2021

122 Retweets1,619 Likes”

-

Aside from Morgan’s column, MailOnline has published 9 other news stories on or related to the book announcement. The most telling of them is one that links the Duchess of Sussex’s book to another one… by the Duchess of Cambridge.

Headlined Bookshelf battle royale! Kate Middleton shares a glimpse inside her Hold Still photobook just a day after Meghan Markle unveiled her own £12.99 children's story, the story unsurprisingly treats Kate with kid gloves while continuing to imply that Meghan is the kind of person who would make gloves out of kids if it suited her devilish schemes.

There’s no shade thrown at the Duchess of Cambridge for revealing further details of her book just hours after Meghan’s announcement. Instead, the story — lavishly illustrated with images from the book — gushes:

The Duchess of Cambridge has shared a glimpse of her photography book Hold Still ahead of its release on Friday…

… Kate, 39, a keen photographer, launched a campaign during the first lockdown last year to ask the public to submit images which captured the period.

It even includes a mention of an image of a BLM protestor saying:

Over the course of the project, the Duchess shared a number of her favourite images on the Kensington Royal Instagram page, including a Black Lives Matter protester holding a sign reading: 'Be on the right side of history.'

If Meghan had done the same she would have been decried for “supporting extremists”. Remember the contrasting way their mutual taste for avocado was covered?

15 Headlines Show How Differently The British Press Treat Meghan Markle Vs Kate Middleton | Bored Panda

Over at The Daily Telegraph, Spiked alumna Ella Whelan offered her thoughts on a book that isn’t released until next month under the headline Meghan Markle’s fun-free children’s book may put an entire generation off reading, which makes it sound like a grimoire full of dark magic rather than a gentle children’s book about kids and their dads.

Just as with the Mail’s story on Kate’s book, it’s worth imagining what Whelan would say if the Duchess of Cambridge had written The Bench. Look at the following section…

It reveals something of the political superficiality of Harry and Meghan’s activism that an “inclusive” book would use the military father as its promotional message. Perhaps it’s a cultural thing, but if my kids have to read about soldiers, I’d prefer Hans Christian Andersen’s tin version rather than the woke posturing of a former royal.

… and notice that because Meghan is the author including a father who is in the military is “political superficiality”. If Kate had written a story that featured an analogue for Prince William — who also spent time in uniform, though in less dangerous circumstances than his ‘spare’ brother — Whelan would likely deem it a ‘touching tribute to their love’.

Similarly, Sarah Ferguson — the ex-wife of Prince Andrew, top Yelp! reviewer for Jeffrey Epstein’s houses and noted avoider of FBI questioning — uses the title Duchess of York on her many execrable children’s books.

Now that Meghan is the tabloid’s new monster in the monarchy, Fergie’s antics are pointed to as a positive with her books flattered even as Meghan’s as-yet-unpublished book is panned.

Image description: “Twitter avatar for @talkRADIO

talkRADIO

@talkRADIO

Meghan Markle is releasing a new children's book about father-son relationships.

Mike Graham: "It's so juvenile. This is somebody who acts like she's still in high school... it's not exactly Tennyson, is it?

@mrmarkdolan | @Iromg Image

May 5th 2021

36 Retweets221 Likes”

-

Over on talkRADIO, Mike Graham — a melting mass of expired meat — ranted about a children’s book, worried perhaps that it will contain too many long words. Speaking to his colleague, Mark Dolan — Dennis Pennis without the charm — Graham crowed:

It’s so juvenile. This is somebody who acts like she’s still in high school… I don’t have anything against her for any particular reason, other than she’s a bit too American, you know. She thinks everything is just great and cheesy. Rhyming the words ‘joy’ and ‘boy’. It’s not exactly Tennyson, is it?

Ah yes, that famous children’s author, Alfred, Lord Tennyson, known for such devastating rhymes as this one from The Lady of Shallot: “She left the web/ She left the loom/ She made three paces through the room.”

I’m not saying The Lady of Shalott is rubbish — though I do still hold a grudge against Tennyson after some very tedious teaching in high school — but that focusing on one rhyme in a poem is an easy trick if you want to say its shit. That Graham cannot see the irony in decrying writing a children’s book as “juvenile” is just one of the reasons he’s employed by a station with less than 1% reach.

Image description: “Twitter avatar for @NadimJBaba

Nadim Baba

@NadimJBaba

Piers Morgan ranting about the one who got away in 5, 4, 3.......

Media Guardian @mediaguardian

Meghan wins copyright claim against Mail on Sunday over letter https://t.co/cJZTgDMvgz

May 5th 2021

1 Like”

-

There’ll be a new round of these columns, stories, and talk radio segments when the book is released, particularly as The Mail on Sunday just lost the second part of Meghan’s copyright claim against it.

There’s nothing that either Meghan or Harry could do that wouldn’t drive these rats in a sack rabid. If they did nothing, they’d be called lazy. When they make things, take jobs, or really say anything the very media that benefits hugely from stories about them scream that it’s a cry for attention. And yet Piers Morgan regularly pissing himself in public is “commentary”.

[tabloidtoc]

National Enquirer, July 13

You can buy a copy of this issue for your very own at my eBay store: https://www.ebay.com/str/bradentonbooks

Cover: Steve Bing knew too much -- movie mogul murdered in Jeffrey Epstein cover-up 

Page 2: Jennifer Garner is blaming ex-husband Ben Affleck’s new squeeze Ana de Armas for him spending a lot more time with their kids making her the odd mom out 

Page 3: Reese Witherspoon wants to muscle in on Gwyneth Paltrow’s turf as a lifestyle guru and Gwyneth is fit to be tied -- Reese is consumed with creating her own business empire and she doesn’t care who gets in the way but Gwyneth can’t believe Reese would encroach on her territory like this 

Page 4: Drew Barrymore’s long-anticipated CBS talk show is in danger of being killed by the coronavirus before it ever airs and Drew is freaking out over doing interviews without her adoring fans smiling from their seats

Page 5: Big-hearted Dolly Parton is helping a devastated Kelly Clarkson bounce back from the wreckage of her shattered marriage, kid-crazy Kathie Lee Gifford is begging her newlywed daughter Cassidy to hurry up and give her a grandchild but it’s embarrassing for Cassidy who’d like to enjoy married life for a little while before starting a family 

Page 6: Dennis Quaid secretly eloped with Laura Savoie, photos of Pierce Brosnan clearly show surgical scars under his left breast revealing the 67-year-old star has recently gone under the knife and a doctor says the scars resemble breast tumor excisions 

Page 7: Jimmy Kimmel might not be coming back as the disgraced late-night talk show host who’s come under fire for performing in blackface in the past has been taking time off for a summer vacation but he may be gone for good -- Jimmy apologized for the blackface incident and making an insensitive joke about Megan Fox but ABC execs are already seeking a replacement and Melissa McCarthy and Kevin Hart and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson are contenders but the name that keeps coming up is Ryan Seacrest 

Page 8: Why Prince Harry hates Prince William -- Will made a bold bid to make peace with his rebel brother Harry but it exploded into a battle royal that may never be mended -- everyone is blaming Henry’s wife Meghan Markle and she certainly hasn’t helped but the rift started way before she came on the scene and goes much deeper than anyone ever knew because Harry hates Will because years of living in his brother’s shadow have left Harry tormented by one all-consuming belief that nobody loves him 

Page 9: Spurned Gayle King is devastated after a younger woman stole away the love of her life U.S. Sen. Cory Booker -- the 65-year-old CBS This Morning host and the 51-year-old New Jersey politician had long been rumored to be hot and heavy before star Rosario Dawson gave Cory a new lease on his love life 

Page 10: Hot Shots -- Alex Trebek and wife Jean wear masks and hard hats as they visit a home improvement store, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson offered a toast of gratitude and tossed back tequila, Brooke Shields doing a puzzle alongside daughters Rowan and Grier Henchy and their pal Luke, Bella Hadid during a photo shoot in Corsica 

Page 11: Megan Fox’s super-hot romance with Machine Gun Kelly has a slim-to-none chance of going the distance because right now their chemistry is sizzling but he’s also turned into Megan’s personal gofer and the people in his life find it pathetic, Matthew Perry has a flabby fanny and he put it on display for the world to see after he suffered a wardrobe malfunction and exposed his tush while climbing out of his car at his Malibu home 

Page 12: Straight Shuter -- Izabel Goulart on the beach (picture), Billie Eilish’s new James Bond song No Time to Die has been a disaster with just 52,000 downloads which is why they’re talking about replacing her, when fashion powerhouse Anna Wintour was still new in town in 1975 she took a walk on the wild side with Bob Marley and her fleeting relationship with Bob is something she’s pretty proud of, tensions between Pete Davidson and the rest of the Saturday Night Live cast were bad but now it’s worse because he thinks he’s a movie star and he’s a nightmare, The Bachelor franchise is making changes to the show far beyond just having the first-ever Black bachelor Matt James by adding more diverse cast and crew 

Page 13: Troubled Southern Charm star Kathryn Dennis was labeled a racist after butting heads with a South Carolina radio personality and now she’s being sued by a Charleston brand consultant who claims Kathryn owes her nearly $5000 in unpaid wages, things are going south for scandal-soaked ratings-challenged reality show Southern Charm as the show is on the verge of cancellation

Page 14: True Crime -- porn star Ron Jeremy was charged with raping three women and sexually assaulting another and could do hard time if found guilty 

Page 15: Bill Cosby is certain the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s shocking decision to hear his appeal for his 2018 rape conviction is the only thing that could keep him from dying behind bars, Crocodile Hunter star Steve Irwin’s Australia Zoo could be shut down for good -- his widow Terri Irwin revealed the heartbreaking news that the beloved Queensland attraction was on the brink of collapse due to the coronavirus pandemic 

Page 16: Pamela Anderson is mortified because her hated ex Adil Rami has been spilling secrets about their sex life, Jeremy Renner’s ex-wife Sonni Pacheco has accused the Avengers star of being a deadbeat dad and demanding $500,000 in back child support and an extra $100,000 for expenses -- she dropped the bombshell in their custody battle over seven-year-old daughter Ava after previously accusing Jeremy of drug abuse and womanizing and claims he retaliated against her by withholding and refusing to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in child support that he was ordered to pay her, NFL superstar Ben Roethlisberger was an alcohol addict and a porn fiend 

Page 18: Real Life 

Page 19: Kim Jong-un’s trigger happy sister Kim Yo-jong is making the North Korean dictator look like a wimp as she ruthlessly tightens her grip on power and pushes the rogue nation closer to war 

Page 20: Hollywood’s Craziest Exes -- wild unions ended in bitter breakups -- Tiger Woods and Elin Nordegren, Madonna and Sean Penn, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard

Page 21: Sandra Bullock and Jesse James, Mel Gibson and Oksana Grigorieva, Paul McCartney and Heather Mills, Angelina Jolie and Billy Bob Thornton 

Page 22: Health Watch, Ask the Vet 

Page 26: Cover Story -- Movie king Steve Bing knew too much -- fears perv Jeffrey Epstein’s pal got tossed from 27th floor in murder staged as suicide 

Page 28: Scientologist Danny Masterson attended an event to combat sexual exploitation at a church-sponsored event years after the religion’s leaders were told he’d been accused of rape, quarantine has fired up Ne-Yo’s love life -- the singer who split from his wife Crystal Smith early this year said that living together under lockdown together has helped him lock back in with his spouse 

Page 34: Chris Evans whines playing superhero Captain America has wrecked his chances for romance -- he thought he’d be married and have kids by now but the whole Captain America phenomenon has left him less trusting about people he meets and what their motivations may be, Hollywood Hookups -- Raven-Symone marries Miranda Maday, Demi Lovato’s boyfriend Max Ehrich is ready to pop the question, Khloe Kardashian and Tristan Thompson are together again during lockdown 

Page 36: Warring exes Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have called a temporary truce as they struggle to find the right school for their kids, troubled Playboy Playmate Ashley Mattingly used a single gunshot to end her short and tragic life 

Page 38: Glen Campbell’s adult children are on the warpath over his widow’s scathing new tell-all because it paints the legendary hitmaker as a booze-soaked maniac 

Page 42: Red Carpet Stars & Stumbles -- Nicole Kidman 

Page 45: Spot the Differences -- Sharon and Kelly and Ozzy Osbourne on the show Celebrity Watch Party 

Page 47: Odd List