#the complexity.... the subtlety.....
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
Hi!
I've seen a few of your posts mentioning a speech color theory and I really wanna know what it's about cause it seems very interesting!.. Hey hey can you tell me more? 🥺...
⭐
Hello, anon!!
Alright, for those who don't know what anon's referring to, after the review I've done for the latest episode, I mentioned the "3's Color Text" theory. Here I'll leave the links to the OG
I'll leave links for the OG post from Shay [X] and one from Funkii adding on to it [X], with some screenshot examples for the visual people. A bit of a disclaimer, this isn't my theory, and I wanna give the proper credit, so please check these posts out!! Share some love and be mindful to not spam likes.
I'm merely just a theorist and certainly not the only one, but I do wanna give my two cents on this. I'll go ahead and sum it up for yall:
For context, the color outline used for 3's subtitles has been inconsistent. Now, the possible logical answers would be that each of the editors used a different shade of blue, or it's just so 3's black subtitles could be seen against the video itself. Clear visual contrast is certainly a priority for any production. Within a fandom, it is speculated that the color determines how much 3 is willing to show his true self; the lighter and brighter the blue it is, the more genuine he is being, which usually is when he breaks out of his "evil" persona and/or out of his own will.
I think it's fun theory, considering how I love that kinda shit. We're all aware of 3 and how he tries to keep up with appearances, we know that he actually cares for the Crew. Strong fronts and all, so I think it's absolutely brilliant that we're able to tell the difference through speech if it was intentional. His words absolutely matter, especially bc of his redemption.
Here, I picked out some example screenshots from the latest episodes (and well, whatever I got on my desktop). I tried the best I could to align the colors from "persona" 3 to true 3:
And uh. y'know me *cough cough*
🥹
It's probably the editor option realistically, I'll admit, but it's kinda like a fun game when you're looking back at previous episodes. Gotta love 3 for being a trouble maker with a hidden heart, he cares deep down. Truly the type of guy that would stand by "be gay, do crime >:)"
thanks for the ask, anon!
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
I've praised George Rextrew a lot for the emotion he put behind various actions, and I stand by that.
But I also want to take a moment to appreciate Jayden Revri's ability to handle Charles' more explosive emotions.
In the Devlin house, you watch his anguish and anger build in equal measure. Unlike the characters, we get to see the build-up to the outburst that leads to him getting stuck in the loop. The first time he sees that man murder his family he wants to look away, he tries to look away. You can see how much it hurts him, but he turns back and watches anyway--and the horror turns to rage.
When the Night Nurse comes, he fights her off--very aggressively yes, but they didn't see what he did when she took him into his memories--and everyone looks at him like...like he's a bomb that may go off again? Like they've never seen him before?
The boy's just been through some of his most traumatic memories and committed an act of violence that probably only made that experience worse, and he sees his friends looking at him the way he'd always feared they would--like he's a bad guy. And Jayden portrays that grief and pain so beautifully.
And when he gives that little "no" while he's crying and jerks away from Edwin's outstretched hand?
My heart feels like it's been squashed and wrung out.
#dead boy detectives#charles rowland#jayden revri#those sort of emotions can be hard to portray because they are so complex and explosive#you have to portray the build-up with subtlety#and then...explode...and that's EXHAUSTING#that kind of emotion takes so much out of you#Everyone on this show is so GOOD
878 notes
·
View notes
Text
Watching Awakening Parts 4 & 5 is mostly just me waiting for my favorite failwoman to have a bazooka-assisted meltdown on national TV
#gargoyles#disney's gargoyles#this whole exchange is flippin' incredible#girl you went from 0 to 60 in 0.3 seconds#she was happy for like… what… an hour? before it all started falling apart#for someone who’s been alive for so long you think she’d’ve learned some patience and subtlety#but no all she really knows is how to betray first and not ask questions later#anyway I can't do justice to her and all her character flaws in these tags but she's incredible and tragic and complex and I love her#demona
194 notes
·
View notes
Text
idk if it's fair to blame the chronically online brain (or the expectation thereof from writers) for recent movies being as subtle as a sledgehammer to the temple but i will either way. first the substance and now mickey 17 seem to have absolutely no faith in their audience's comprehension skills and just, hand you the metaphor and then make sure you got it about 80 billion times. maybe it's good to have such an obvious message in these times, especially given people's habit to interpret satirical characters as role models, but when your main antagonist looks about 2 foundation shades away from an snl trump impression it feels like you're just making bad art
#sorry im being a pretentious hater#but both these movies really annoyed me cuz they dont have faith in their audience#in the substance. they adr their message in about 18 times and show you the same flashback on loop to make sure you got the message#in mickey 17 they straight up do a parody of trump. with no subtlety or pretense. and honestly it's a bit embarassing#honestly i think if they'd reeled the trump impression in a lot more but kept in the assassination attempt it could've been really powerful#like. as it is. the character you already know is trump has the same thing that happened to trump happened to him. wow. so interesting#but if it was more unsure that it was trump. if it was less crazy less ridiculous. and now. you realise. this is the president of america.#i feel like that would've had more impact#that's not even my main qualm with mickey 17 my main qualm is the dialogue is super clunky and unsubtle and the constant overuse of#emotional music makes it so stale and simplistic#it's a comedy so i wasnt exactly expecting emotional complexity but i feel like it could've benefited from some more silent moments and#from paying better attention to the dialogue. giving it more emotional importance. and leaving more unsaid. like the convo between 18 and#marshall felt so disingenuine. i think marshall would've cowered more and you could've just used robert pattinson's actual acting to show#not tell#anyways#i did still enjoy both these movies#just wish they were a lot better#sorry for the very long rant#i should have a cinema blog. i would LOVE to yap about movies all the time
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
you need so much brain power to read dunnett in part because you're constantly trying to figure out why characters are doing whatever the fuck they're doing. this information will not be presented to you in a clear and concise way. sometimes the characters themselves don't even know the reason they're doing those things, so you have to figure out things that are hidden from you by the author, and from the character because repression/self-denial/trauma/etc. sometimes they know exactly why they're doing all of that, but they have so much more information than you do, so you're at a disadvantage still. if you're lucky you'll be following a character who is honest and open about their feelings... but this is a dorothy dunnett novel so those characters are 1 out of a 100.
and i wouldn't have it any other way!! i can imagine how these books would be written by someone who didn't love subtlety as much, or someone who didn't trust their readers enough. they'd be so, so much worse, that's for sure
#dorothy dunnett#post brought to you by my thoughts reading the scenes between nicholas anna and julius in C&R#authors who hate subtlety trying to write complicated characters with complex dynamics where have i seen that before...#it's the radiant emperor duology. sorry. i like those books but they would've been so much better#if the author liked being subtle even a little bit instead of feeling like they needed to spell out everything...#anyway dorothy 🫶
23 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm always amused by the "x's politics are more dangerous than y's" arguments. It's comparing apples and oranges.
#OOC / HOLLY.#they're all dangerous but in different ways#i.e. in Orlais the trick is to hint at your involvement in xyz without actually leaving evidence#in Tevinter the trick is to leave no hint of your involvement at all and to always be 'justified'#in Nevarra the trick is to work through so many proxies so subtly that they'll have to mow down 45 ppl before you're even suspected#in Antiva the loudest voice wins; even when you hire assassins they have to make a statement#in Orzammar you need the moral high ground and a scapegoat. you need to seem more righteous than everyone else#I could keep going but the point is they all have their dangers and complexities#you can utterly excel at one yet flounder in another if plonked into it#you need to understand the subtlety of the circumstances shaping these political arenas#if you don't at least attempt that you don't stand a chance
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Even most atheists still have a spirituality...
Do atheists bury their dead? Why? ... clearly there is something immaterial to be celebrated there, a spirit (?), when the dead are being cared for and respected in any way.
Yet I myself might be the most atheist person in any given room, I turned my back on religion after some of my family got killed, and that is a stone hard place of atheism to be in. Yet I have seen a sprite, I've seen it with eyes in flesh, I recall this memory daily, often, I'm lucky in the sense I've seen what many only ponder, so that means I may still be argued back into atheism because it requires no faith to see something material. It becomes an odd atheist argument to argue that at times, in odd situations, the spiritual becomes material. I have a bridge here, I'm the hardest core atheist you will meet yet I have knowledge of the spiritual, beyond just faith which is what Christians ask for.
Can a spirituality be based on knowledge and still validly call itself a spirituality?....
#philosophy#spirituality#atheism#you tell me am I spiritual or atheist??!#i don't even know lol#could validly be seen as either#yet i remain in faith ultimately with the highest Almighty#i trust myself...my senses. The sense of touch is more complex than made out to be#reading body language is a strength of mine#i can read people easily many would call me a psychic...yet even this is based on material subtlety#nothing immaterial#i do know better psychics though who read much more deeply#too deeply#I have knowledge of the spiritual realm which renders me still maybe a religious atheist
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
notes from the burning age was good inthat claire north is a genius but bad in that claire north worldbuilding is not very good
#.din#.txt#i love claire north books i like that she likes to kick the shit out of her male characters. so good.#the sudden appearance of hope was incredible because it was a woman protagonist. and she didnt get tortured like ven did in burning age.#if you like TOXIC YAOI and ENVIRONMENTALISM and COMPLEX FEMALE CHARACTERS youll love NOTES FROM THE BURNING AGE.#like the worldbuilding is so I GET ITTTTTTTTTTTTT but claire norths style is sooooooooooooo subtle. so subtle.#like i thought some of the worldbuilding was stupid but i think the book was so good and the main characters so compoelling.#and the others too of course but the subtlety of norths style makes the characterization whispier.#but like i said if you like TOXIC YAOI and ENVIRONMENTALISM and COMPLEX FEMALE CHARACTERS youll love NOTES FROM THE BURNING AGE.#the first few pages are the worst part but its over fast. its so good. i love claire north.
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Idk why Tumblr thinks that couples that have absolutely everything in common means that they have "more depth" and are "more well-rounded" than couples that are not.
#fictional couples#txt#this is where the argument la!ariel and eric have way more depth than their animated counterpart comes from#no they do not have more depth y'all just do not understand the concept of nuance#because we live in an era where everything needs to be explained exposed and laid out#no room for nuance nor subtlety whatsoever#also this feeds into the silly idea that if a couple has nothing in common it means they do not love each other#when reality often shows that similar interests although cool are actually irrelevant as to whether or not a couple will remain together#i mean i'm here for parallels but i prefer it when both characters are still different enough from each other#not when they are the same version but just opposite sex of each other#that is not more deep and complex. it's just lazy
2 notes
·
View notes
Text

2024 reads / storygraph
Monstersona
YA sci-fi/romance/thriller
a girl who’s moved across the country after her parents’ divorce, to a small town home to the HQ of an international tech company
when she wakes up to find the labs blown up, town on fire, and her mum likely dead, she, her dog, and a classmate drive across the country to find her dad
but quickly realise they’re being chased by dangerous agents, and there might be something different about the girl she’s traveling with..
explores grief, bi MC & LI
#monstersona#that tag sure isn't gonna be related to this book is it.#chloe spencer#aroaessidhe 2024 reads#I thought this was okay.#tonally a bit all over the place? a lot of it is just road trip traveling dealing with grief meeting random people#then there’s some very fast paced evil scientist people trying to kill them bits#- (or I guess just those parts felt very overdramatic vs the more subtle normal parts)#I had assumed it was going to be like apocalyptic but it’s just their town that burned down. everywhere else (most of the book) is normal#there's some complex exploration of grief; but some other aspects (like her relationship with her father)#could have used a bit more detail/subtlety maybe?#one random thing that I thought was Weird: the LI is like we could get thai; lists a couple basic thai foods that they could order#and the MC is like omg how do you know so much about thai food???#????? i don’t eat thai really but i would not be shocked and surprised at someone just saying they were familiar with it?#why did she react like that?? do they not have thai food in portland??? huh?
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
funky little graphic for my splitmates subsystem and how they affect each other
#our t#plural stuff#its not perfect because like#how do you perfectly distill all the complexities of plurality and subsystems within a polyfragmented DID(+OSDD) system#but its pretty close if you look at em linearly#brobot also answers to atom and pluto but he cant decide#also got a bgd in here but hes attached to jakes subsystem#'splitmate' as if he isnt my in-brain partner lmao. but yknow. subtlety in polite company or w/e#PLEASE excuse ambrose being represented by brown against all these beautiful sunset-y colours it is unfortunately his favourite colour#hes so interesting
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
stop putting that stupid ass vladimir nabokov rereading lecture on my dash 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
"one cannot read a book, one can only reread it" SKILL ISSUE!!!!!! I READ THEM ALL THE TIME!!!!
#i hear it referenced all the time at my uni as well and it just pisses me off how pretentious it is...#like yes i 100% agree that there are some very complex works out there where a reread helps shed a lot of light on them#i do it too when i feel i havent fully grasped the meaning of a book#all my love and appreciation to rereads + i deeply respect people who choose to reread all their books.#HOWEVER.#stop acting like a reread is NECESSARY for EVERY BOOK. ON THE PLANET.#thats just not fucking.true??!?#i understand the books i read just fine. i read them#usually once#and as i continue to think about them over time#more and more things fall into place and make sense and i start to formulate a cohesive interpretation of it#i also like to discuss the book with other people and tell my friends about it#and seek out literary criticism/commentary on the topic as well as research any contextual elements i didn't understand while reading#so thats why i hate that nabokov lecture so much. it generalizes. yes rereads are useful and magical but theyre not always. necessary.#especially for certain books that straightup are not written with complexity and subtlety in mind?#oh yeah also nabokov was an Alyosha Karamazov hater so i just dont trust that mfs takes on literature /hj#ok rant over lol just had to get this off my chest#calugaritsa original
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Keith: “Suck On The Jugular” is Mr. Watts again. I mean, it's all drums. The arrangement is all to do with the drums. Charlie laid down that beat and I said, 'Well, if you can keep that up for several minutes, we've got a track. 'Hey, no problem.' And he always makes it look like it isn't.
Charlie: It used to be called 'Holetown Prison' and we did that in Barbados near Holetown. That's what we would loosely term a groove song; I like those a lot. We did a whole bunch of those type of songs, but a lot of them didn't get on the record because it wasn't the right time to use them. I like those songs more than our ballads.
(1994)
#Don Was what exactly did you say they couldn’t put on this album?#and how much therapy did you need to cope with hearing it?#(also I was surprised to hear Charlie say that. b/c I think they have so many lovely ballads. and his drumming is maybe the most important#thing to distinguish them from other rock ballads. he had so much subtlety and complexity and can really play soft. it makes ghost songs)#*those songs#the rolling stones#charlie watts#keith richards#old married band#quote
20 notes
·
View notes
Text

dorothy really had a gift when it comes to telling you things in a way that you know what you're being told is significant to the character in some way, but you're not directly being told how the character feels, and so you want to stop and analyze each word and go back to reread the other scenes being mentioned. and put everything and everyone under microscope
#house of niccolo#hon rr#to lie with lions#it makes it so you don't really fully get it a lot of the time. but damn it makes the characters feel so compelling and complex#i love subtlety... i don't need to know exactly what everything means all the time!
3 notes
·
View notes
Note
if you had the chance to include one of stewy’s deleted lines (from the scripts) in the show, which one would you pick. I would pick the one from the pusilanimous fools gold scene, when stewy asks kendall how logan got at him and mentions money, drugs and sex as some of the things they like. That line alone makes kenstewy undeniable.
tbh id only do the funeral scene, just because we deserved to see more than 3 times in the season, but more than that it really made sense for him to be there (plus the way we have it in the script was a run in at the hotel after the funeral, but we know arian and jeremy shot something solo on a rooftop so i know there’s still a lot there that we missed out on)
everything else in the scripts (besides the character traits that were thankfully cut like stewy being a dad) i feel still showed up in the subtext or wouldve been too in the face if they’d kept it in. i agree tho that the implications of them keeping that line in would have been absolutely insane, but i still think it worked better without it. succession is very much a less is more kind of show and everything they cut worked best to that regard
#i dont think kenstewy needs to ve undeniable there is already so much there that says plenty#plus i think the subtlety makes it more complex and more fun#that being said i think i would have screamed out loud of i heard those words in real time#ask#anon#m
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Weaving Themes into Your Writing: Crafting Meaningful Narratives
Stories are more than a sequence of events; they are a reflection of the human experience. Themes form the backbone of storytelling, providing depth and significance to the narrative. In this exploration of weaving themes into your writing, we will delve into the art of incorporating themes into your stories and why they matter. Themes are the heart and soul of your narrative, and understanding…
View On WordPress
#Central Idea#Character Development#Crafting Narratives#Literary Themes#Message in Writing#Plot Structure#Story Cohesion#Story Meaning#Storytelling Depth#Subtle Storytelling#Symbolism in Writing#Thematic Consistency#Thematic Elements#Thematic Subtlety#Theme Exploration#Universal Themes#Writing Complexity#Writing Insights#Writing Themes
4 notes
·
View notes