Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Just found this but couldn’t reblog it. I had just finished organizing a doc for a fanfic that I’m working on with a friend…. I guess I need to fucking move it now. Ffs.
197 notes
·
View notes
Text

In the states you can go to Walmart and buy a shotgun using your Mastercard, but a game could be censored for being LGBTQ themed.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
This dude is behind the recent push to make it more and more difficult to propose games that deal with difficult subject matters and NSFW themes to the public.
He pressured Steam and GAVE THE ORDERS to Visa, and Mastercard.
Try and get his ass in whichever way you can. Talk about him. Download this vid, safekeep it, it could be taken down at any moment.
His name is Russ Vought. He wants to dismantle Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This would make it legal to pressure and threaten online communities for what their users post. Censorship of games regarding NSFW, horror and queer content follows.
Beware.
565 notes
·
View notes
Text
My current not-approved-by-the-government opinion is that im not anyone's parent and i should not be responsible for random teenagers online. If I post smth thats 'meant for adults' and its labled as such then what happens from there is literally not my problem. If a teen- who is fully capable of turning on self moderation settings on their own btw- doesn't use a site's provided self moderation settings and they see boobs or dicks then like literally whatever, its neither the end of the world or a big deal. It shouldn't fall on me or a website or a tech company to do a parent's job, and also frankly i don't think a parent should be breathing down their 16 year old's neck on the off chance they do actually want to look at tits, but thats a discussion that americans will fucking throw a fit at so maybe we'll discuss that another day in better company.
"But what about young children!!" see thats! where parents should be involved- that is to say, why are you letting your young child on the internet in the first place, you fucking idiot.
51K notes
·
View notes
Text
My followers know I hate talking about politics and current events, and generally refuse to do so, but this is important.
A bill has been introduced in the US that would make all pornography a federal crime. Owning it. Creating it. Distributing it.
Under this law, fanart of nude characters would be a federal crime.
Under this law, depictions of homosexuality or simply being transgender, would be considered pornography and a federal crime.
This bill is not going to pass.
However, the reason for this bill is to continue to push the "overton window". The reason for this bill is to make banning pornography seem more and more normal to everyone until they can actually do that.
And remember, they consider depictions of gay characters and transgenders characters "pornography" in any context, including platonic.
They have been working on this for a decade now and it has been working.
If you are one of the people in fandom who thinks that "nasty" porn on AO3 should be banned because it's "icky" or "immoral", then this mental scam is working on you.
Censorship is never about protecting people.
Censorship is always about control.
Do not let the rising moral panic affect your mind and make you weak to propaganda that lets others control you and control what you watch and read.
Do not fall for the scam.
When they say they are going to ban "pornography" it means they're going to ban anything they don't like by calling it "pornography" and they don't like you!!
35K notes
·
View notes
Text
had a fascinating english class that resulted in the notes header “the forcefeminization of victor frankenstein”
81K notes
·
View notes
Text
Ok my brothers math teacher has pissed me off so bad that I’m writing an email. Do you know how seethingly mad I have to be to write an email.
43K notes
·
View notes
Text
what? oh sweetheart no, you're not weirding me out at all. you're weirding me in. keep talking, freak
136K notes
·
View notes