wipgender
wipgender
gender cynical
5 posts
female, dysphoric and desisting ▪︎ AAP, GAMP, AGAMP ▪︎ questioning bisexual ▪︎ limp dicked neoBlanchardist ▪︎ paraphilic ▪︎ into sexology ▪︎ critical of the trans community/movements but transition ambivalent
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
wipgender · 1 month ago
Text
Hi, you can call me Vern.
I identified as transmasc non binary from 11-19 and was fully detransitioned by the time I was 20.
I'm still figuring out what gender means, where I fit, what it means to be female, etc etc.
I've got sexual trauma, dysphoria, and a set of general perversions I'm still trying to unravel and contextualize.
DMs and askbox open, would love to talk to anyone about their thoughts and experiences.
1 note · View note
wipgender · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
“FEMALE”
patti smith, 1967
5K notes · View notes
wipgender · 2 months ago
Text
The idea that male and female do not present as two neutral, equal human variations, but that there is some default, sexless human body is worrying. The idea that sex is composed of a series of parts that we can refigure at will. The idea that before puberty, we are sexless and able to be molded. The idea that natural puberty is as unnatural and irreversible as a synthetic one. This idea is deeply anti-human- how is no one seeing this??
I don’t think transgender people themselves should be called gross, or mutilated or monsters, I do not think transitioning itself somehow ruins someone, I am not talking about them or their bodies, but the ideology. How are people not realizing how pseudoscientific and hateful this rhetoric is becoming? The idea that sex is a series of parts, that somehow we are naturally sexless, that our bodies are not complete and connected wholes, is increasingly becoming part of the transgender movements rhetoric? The body as parts. People with utererus, people with prostates, people with penises. We are all just a series of commodities, to be bought and sold, our human bodies are the enemy, our male and female forms are aberrations, mistakes that were forced on our sexless default. We exist beyond our body. We are more than our body. To define ourself by our body is reductive, dehumanizing. And, of course, the biggest voice against this currently is right-wing, but not because of their pro-human stance, because they think that our bodies belong to god. They were the ones who got us here in the first place! The idea that our bodies aren’t ‘us’ but are merely limitations, the idea that the female body in particular is grotesque, only for breeding, bleeding, serving, penetrating. I’m scared at how further this is going to go.
#rb
602 notes · View notes
wipgender · 2 months ago
Text
Is Neil Cicierega aware that a good portion of his fanbase are teenage girls sexually skinwalking him
0 notes
wipgender · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
I think this is a big reason why TRAs are so desperate to shut down detransitioners. Seeing public detransitioners can cause people who are currently trans identified people to start to question the ideology. And this whole ideology is such a house of cards that once you start to think about it critically it's only a matter of time until it falls apart.
1K notes · View notes