acf3000

[acf3000]

Video-Möglichkeiten:

[acf3000]

HUMAN NATURE ---

Both Nietzsche and Stirner were right about one thing:

> That freedom to individualism makes most happy.

But both were wrong in the assumed "main drive" and the vices to satisfy it:

> It is not the "will to power", ...

> and possibly asocial emotionalism is harmful to all.

All living beings must survive, be able to develop (mainly to attract mates) and ensure the survival of their offspring.

The emotional reward system has evolved for this purpose.

All living beings are therefore driven by the "will to happiness" (through fun and the creation of reasons for contentment as independently as possible).

(Specifically in humans, the highest motive was already called "eudaemonia" in ancient times.)

In order to achieve this, "strategic" values and virtues are necessary:

Most fundamental is the biological necessity to protect one's physical health.

This establishes the fundamental right to one's own body, which can be described as "inalienable self-ownership".

This implies the mutual obligation not to initiate harmful violence and to restrict one's own self-determination largely to consensual relationships.

"Counter-politically", this would manifest itself in a gradual introduction of a ban on aggression ("non-aggression principle").

In order for this to be introduced in a socially acceptable manner, the existential foundations for it must remain secure...

This would also be the case in a liberal meritocracy:

> Paternalistic basic security ("social welfare"), and...

> Affordable healthcare.

This makes it possible to create the educational and biological prerequisites for survival and prosperity in a largely non-violent social order.

(Keyword: "Liberty empowerment".)

For harmonious coexistence and cooperation, it is necessary in all phases:

> Act mutually both indirectly and directly ("moral reciprocity").

> Only make offers of voluntary acceptance without any obligation to do so.

> Develop and cultivate your ethical, cognitive and performative skills. ("Triad of trustworthiness.")

> And also to help proactively in the medical ethical sense.

Basic security is particularly important for economically dependent people (such as the young, the old and the ill).

This still requires so-called "positive rights" (which unfortunately can only be financed most reliably through tax collection).

(Supposed "anarcho-capitalist purists" who demand isolated extreme positions are only intended to damage sensible reform proposals such as this one.)

This is why I would like to call such a program "paternalistic voluntarism".

It remains to be seen how it would be received. I hope that these ideas will one day be heard (in an unadulterated form).

[acf3000]

GLÜCKSREPUBLIK-#INTEGRATION

(*) Grundrechte:

0. Körperliches Selbsteigentum -->

1. Gedankenfreiheit -->

2. Angriffsverbot -->

3. Frieden -->

(*) Strategische Werte:

4. Diskursethik -->

5. Maximieren der WillensFreiheit -->

6. Medizinethik für Institutionen -->

7. Mehr Vertrauenswürdigkeit -->

(*) Ökonomie:

8. Große Auswahl -->

9. Paternalismus -->

10. Rationalere Entscheidungen -->

(*) Evolutionswerte:

11. Enkelprinzip ("inklusive Fitness") -->

12. Freie Wissenschaftszivilisation -->

(*) Ultimativer Wert:

13. Mehr Gründe für EUDÄMONIE (Zufriedenheit & Freude)

[acf3000]

My ethics are not designed for pragmatism, but for "contextual consideration with foresight" (sustainability). Each value segment is arranged in a chronologically conclusive sequence. The inner segments naturally follow from the outer ones, otherwise caution is advised.

Intelligence > Career > Wealth > Health > Sex & Love > Contentment

[acf3000]

If you're a philosophically inclined Libertarian/ Voluntaryist, please connect with me on https://www.linkedin.com/in/verkaufsforschung.

[acf3000]

#Libertarians who do not see "limits to growth" and do not want to deny the existence of higher powers (secular "gods"), I recommend "THE PRIME DISCOVERY" by author Frank R. Wallace.

https://kardashev.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Kardashev_Scale

[acf3000]

"#Sünde" objektiv zu definieren ist fast unmöglich. Demzufolge beruht das zumeist auf reiner EINBILDUNG.

Bekämpfung der #Kriminalität hingegen IST Aufgabe des Staates. Sie ist eindeutig empirisch, die Einleitung von MEDIZINISCHEM Schaden von (menschlichen) Personen gegen Unschuldige.

[acf3000]

FAZIT (meiner Faschismus-Tests)

Ich bin etwas auf der "faschistischen" Seite, weil ich...

> "#AUTORITÄR" Freiheit #verteidigen würde

> "#MITLÄUFER", weil ich auch Rechtskonservative #leben lassen würde!

Kann man alles erklären.

Zusammen könnte "Mitläufer" (wenig dominant) aber "autoritär" (hörig?) als eher #unterwürfiger persönlicher Stil interpretiert werden.

Dazu passt, dass ich im #DISG "G(ewissenhaft)" mit einer leichten Tendenz zu "D(ominant)" habe...

[acf3000]

RELIGIÖSE EUGENIK + ANTIEUGENIK

Der #Faschismus kehrt nur deswegen immer wieder ins Leben zurück, weil er zur Ausbeutung von Gott-#Gläubigen periodisch erschaffen und vernichtet wird.

Dabei werden DIE LOGIKER #genetisch DEGENERIERT, und die GUTEN Gene von Gläubigen okkupiert.

[acf3000]

#POSTMODERNE ist wie Dummstellen:

"Ja, erzähl du nur. Solange du kein Sozialist oder Marxist bist wie ich, bin ich bei allem realitäts-'skeptisch' und wende darauf 'mehrwertige Logik' an."

Die andere Variante des OBSKURANTISMUS ist der (religiöse) #MYSTIZISMUS:

"Ich weiß es [angeblich] nicht besser."

[acf3000]

The reactionaries always fall for the revolution fad when they cannot mentally cope with an unpleasant idea. Then they simply arm themselves!

By the way, a lot of nonsense is spread about this, which is simply not true, if one would take the trouble to inquire.

That is the logic of the warriors, not of the peace bringers!

[acf3000]

From the outside, the individual FREEDOM OF WILL must find its limit at least in the legitimate right to Self-Ownership (and derived individual rights) of other humans, in the case of positive rights of objectively dependent people, even already there!

[acf3000]

#Liberty is the absence of (and protection/ retaliation against) initiatory threats with or use of harmful physical coercion and fraud (aggressions) by [human] persons against other human's bodies, their legitimate property or contractual rights (selfownership).

[acf3000]

#Freiheit ist die Abwesenheit von (und Schutz/ Vergeltung gegen) einleitende Androhungen oder Anwendungen von schädlichem körperlichen Zwang und Betrug (Aggressionen) durch [menschliche] Personen gegen die Körper anderer Menschen, ihr legitimes Eigentum oder ihre Vertragsrechte (Selbsteigentum).

[acf3000]

Der Duale Kern der #DiskursEthik, und seine Gegner:

A> Widerspruchsfreiheit <>> FUNDAMENTALISTEN (#Mystiker)

B> Aggressionsverzicht <>> EXTREMISTEN (#Gewalteinleiter)

[acf3000]

Bezugspunkte zum Christentum (hier: Persuasion R & D - Fürstenberg Verkaufsforschung) https://www.instagram.com/p/CWfxgYxs_fc/?utm_medium=tumblr

[acf3000]

Mit "aufgeräumten" Alternativbezeichnungen. (hier: Persuasion R & D - Fürstenberg Verkaufsforschung) https://www.instagram.com/p/CR7PV8ooKcI/?utm_medium=tumblr