aeltri

[aeltri]

Who Is Uncle Harvey?

On the surface, Harvey Weinstein is the son of a diamond cutter and a homemaker in Flushing, Queens. That looks working-class, but diamond trade = banking-adjacent Jewish families, many of whom were Frankist descendants. Flushing/Queens in the 1950s–70s had a cluster of crypto-dynastic merchant families with quiet ties to Eastern European banking clans. Meaning that he's probably from a second-tier bloodline (not front-facing like the Rothschilds, but plugged into the same diaspora network).

Both of his marriages (to Eve Chilton and Georgina Chapman) weren’t about attraction alone. Eve Chilton (1st wife) came from Boston Brahmin–style elite stock, tied into Anglo-American financial/legal networks. That gave Harvey a respectable old money foothold in the U.S. establishment. Georgina Chapman (2nd wife) was not only a fashion designer (Marchesa, bankrolled by Weinstein) but also connected to British aristocratic and banking circles. Through her, Harvey entered the UK society circuit, making himself acceptable to old nobility and their heirs. So while he looked like a brutish outsider, he was consciously marrying upward into dynasties that could legitimize him.

You see this a lot: men who look awkward, even grotesque, suddenly married into prestigious bloodlines. Why? Because they’re Handlers or financial operators trusted by the bloodlines. Also serving as carriers of dynastic Frankist DNA, not comely or brilliant but still valuable genetically and strategically. They’re bridge builders: used to merge hidden bloodlines with outwardly prestigious ones. That’s why someone like Harvey could “punch above his weight” socially. Harvey's Neanderthalic appearance is misleading. He was likely a deliberate plant, the ugly, crude mogul mask hid the fact that he was a high-ranking operative for the Frankist/Bankster faction. A bridge into Anglo-Brahmin and British elite bloodlines via marriage and a Breeder whose twisted offspring could be placed in other nests (like Ben's).

[aeltri]

We are not the same 👑

[aeltri]

wtf is that JLC pic u just posted? Please tell me that is not from a real campaign. what did they do to his eyes and his mouth? Looks like a frog. God awful photoshop job

It's still better than Gambles' "work". Funny how the people who got paid six figures to mismanage Ben's brand are the same ones whining about a mock-up. Newsflash: I didn't receive a paycheck from JLC, but I still managed to highlight what y'all should have done. If the best counter you’ve got is “but his eyes look weird in Photoshop,” maybe that’s because you can’t defend the actual strategy. That’s called deflection, sweetie. The elephant in the room isn’t that image, it’s your collective failure.

[aeltri]

[aeltri]

[aeltri]

TEMPORALITY IN CRIMSON (2025)

Artist: Anonymous Witness

A lone monk, robed in ceremonial red, and wearing Nikes drifts past the crimson glow of a “1-HR” sign. Only upon closer examination does the viewer realize the text belongs not to an ancient temple, but to a Walgreens 1-Hour Photo service, a monument to impermanence disguised as consumer convenience.

The glitch effect fractures the image, evoking the instability of memory in the Digital Age. This juxtaposition forces the audience to confront the uneasy truce between spiritual timelessness and retail immediacy. In an age where wisdom is pursued slowly and photographs are processed instantly, the piece asks: Which will fade first, our prints or our patience?

[aeltri]

Luxury Watches & Magic Amulets: A Masterclass in Missing the Point

Fun fact: I spent over a decade in sales, brand ambassadorship, mascot gigs, marketing, and market research. I’ve done everything from sweating in a mascot suit at 100° to making sure noobie brand ambassadors didn’t do anything stupid in front of a CEO. I know exactly what makes a good brand fit…and more importantly, what doesn’t. Basic marketing sense says: know your product, know your audience. Marvel’s audience? Comic-Con diehards, collectible merch buyers, Timex Marlin if they’re feeling fancy. Jaeger-LeCoultre? That’s for the posh gallery circuit and people who think ‘MCU’ is a private club in Knightsbridge. It’s like pairing a $20K Swiss dress watch with a character whose most iconic accessory is a glowing magic amulet. You want thematic? Jacob & Co.’s Astronomia Solar Zodiac looks like it fell out of the Sanctum Sanctorum. Even their more affordable mechanicals are more on-brand than a Reverso Tribute. But no, let’s pair Ben with a campaign that screams 'Cunter’s wine-and-auction plus-one’ instead of Sorcerer Supreme. Why connect with the fans when you can alienate them for the sake of a couple of gala photos and a spread in Tatler?

[aeltri]

[aeltri]

Good morning everyone.

Just figured I'd put a link to my Ebay store down here for easier access.

Feel free to look around the store, or, if you just wanna reblog this link to show your support feel free!

Enjoy!

[aeltri]

Ghislaine’s Book of Grudges: Sophie Hunter Edition

She’s checking it once, she’s checking it twice…and she’s sending a free copy to the Feds.

In the gilded cage of elite social climbing, Cunter forgot the first rule: never bite the hand that feeds you, especially if it fed you cocaine, press coverage, and legal miracles.

How Cunter Got In the Book:

🖼 Gallery Sponsorship – Cunter's “art world” credibility started with an “internship” at Michael Maxwell AKA Marina Abramovic's gallery, arranged by Ghislaine herself.

📰 The Atlantic Hit Piece – Commissioned by Ghislaine to swat down chatter about the baby fakery that was threatening Cunter and Markle's flimsy PR facade.

🚨 LaGuardia 2017 – Nabbed muling coke (allegedly via Matthew Daniel Siskin AKA Gambles), detained at the same federal facility as Epstein, almost shipped to Club Fed. Then, poof! File sealed, courtesy of Ghislaine’s magic Rolodex.

But instead of staying in line, Cunter tried to freelance her way into Met Gala relevance while trash-talking and snitching on the very people who had previously saved her ass. That’s how you get inked into Ghislaine’s Book of Grudges; bold, underlined, no eraser. Cunter's no longer an asset, she’s a liability with a big mouth and more debt than dignity. In Ghislaine’s world, grudges are currency, and Cunter's name isn’t just circled, it’s gift-tagged. The next “recipient” of that file wears a badge, works a federal desk, and loves an easy flip. So Cunter can keep hiding behind PR puff pieces and dusty theater credits. The Book is in circulation now…and the house always collects.

[aeltri]

The Real History of the So-called British Empire

The Marranos, crypto-Jews who acted as proto-Sabbateans, were initially tolerated by Queen Isabel during the Reconquista, but her later discovery of a plot to overthrow her prompted the 1492 expulsion. Many resettled in Portugal and France, embedding themselves in court and merchant networks. In France, these circles appear to have groomed Anne Boleyn, possibly of crypto-Jewish descent, to act as a political wedge. Through her influence over Henry VIII, she engineered England’s break with Spain and the Vatican, shattering the Catholic alliance Isabel had built. This rupture weakened Spain geopolitically, destabilized Christendom, and opened the way for emerging financial powers aligned with Marrano interests. Once Boleyn had served her purpose, she was discarded, but the strategic damage; millions affected by war, religious persecution, and economic upheaval was already irreversible.

Anne Boleyn’s daughter was quietly disposed of and replaced with a Changeling boy, giving the occultist–intelligentsia faction (Dee, Bacon, proto-Masons) the opportunity to enthrone what would become the first Androgyne monarch in symbolic and possibly biological terms. This ruler’s reign cemented the Tudor state as a breeding ground for Rosicrucian and early Masonic experimentation. Over the next century, Freemasonry, initially a blend of esoteric Christianity and natural philosophy, was infiltrated and redirected by Marrano-descended merchant–financier clans, who had by then evolved into Sabbatean-Frankists. This captures the English-speaking world’s emerging intelligence and financial apparatus, feeding directly into the Bauer → Rothschild transformation and allied banking dynasties, which now exert transnational control over most political, military, and economic systems.

Ezra Pound argued that the Rothschilds, as archetypal Sabbatean-Frankist bankers, turned Britain into “a nation of slaves” by capturing its money supply after Waterloo, locking it into a system of perpetual debt. Controlling the bond market and the Bank of England, they made the state dependent on their credit, ensuring that taxes from ordinary Britons flowed endlessly to service interest rather than fund the common good. By deciding which industries and colonial ventures received financing, they steered Britain’s economy and foreign policy to serve private banking interests while leaving the public to shoulder the costs. Through political funding and cultural influence, they neutralized opposition and redefined imperial expansion as national pride, masking what Pound saw as debt bondage; slavery without chains, enforced not by soldiers, but by usury.

The “British Empire” brand was largely a front for a Sabbatean-Frankist financial empire that happened to use Britain as it's flagship. The Crown, Parliament, and even much of the aristocracy were essentially the front office; projecting naval power, enforcing colonial policy, and running the administration while the real strategic control rested with transnational banking families who used Britain’s military and legal apparatus as tools. The British people, meanwhile, were indoctrinated to believe the empire was theirs, binding them to it's upkeep through taxes, military service, and a rigid culture of protocol and class hierarchy. In reality, they were the middle managers and foot soldiers for a merchant–banker elite whose loyalties were not to Britain at all, but to a global Sabbatean-Frankist network. That’s why the empire’s expansion always coincided with wars, debt spikes, and financial “rescue” packages from the very bankers who engineered the crises, and why that slavish attachment to imperial pride looks so tragically misplaced in hindsight.

Keir Starmer’s recent admission in Parliament of being “Jewish” which, in the context of his background and political positioning, aligns more with Sabbatean-Frankist lineage, marks the final move in the Rothschilds’ long game. For over two centuries, the Rothschild network methodically captured Britain’s financial core through the City of London, shaped Parliament via party funding and media influence, and embedded itself in establishment legal, intelligence, and even monarchy-adjacent circles. Starmer, a technocrat with deep prosecutorial and intelligence ties, arrived at a moment of economic crisis and social unrest, ensuring that when Britain’s next systemic collapse occurs, the “rescue” will follow Rothschild restructuring priorities rather than national interest. His admission serves as a coded signal to insiders that the UK premiership is now openly in the family’s hands, completing a 200-year infiltration arc. The so-called British Empire, already a façade for a Sabbatean-Frankist financial empire, now has it's political leadership directly in place; the help taking orders from the very dynasty that owns the estate.

Montezuma’s obsidian mirror, which is the rightful property of the Miravalle branch of the D’Avalos, was stolen and given to John Dee. It became one of the core occult tools guiding British imperial policy, serving as a portable black mirror for sustained contact with Archonic intelligences. In the wrong hands, it has functioned as a spiritual WMD, allowing Sabbatean-Frankist operators, including the Rothschilds, to draw strategic and manipulative guidance from non-human sources. Their refusal to return it is not about heritage but about maintaining an active, centuries-old gateway. Our ancestral link gives us legitimate claim and, a kind of jurisdiction, which may explain why one entity identified it as the “Well of Darkness” in our presence, a forced disclosure under cosmic law. Recovering and neutralizing it would break one of their longest-running channels of influence. On a far larger scale, CERN appears to be their modern, industrialized equivalent: a planetary black mirror disguised as particle research, capable of manipulating the energetic fabric of reality to open doorways or amplify contact with those same intelligences. In that sense, CERN is the macrocosm to the black mirror’s microcosm, both existing along a continuum of tools for breaching the veil. Removing the original would not only strike a blow at the occult lineages rooted in the UK but could also disrupt the resonance that supports the larger infrastructure. This explains why our collective visions keep circling back to Britain as the epicenter of a malignant power.

[aeltri]

You do know that before going after Jews, the Nazis went after neurodivergent people. People like you. Which means you're spreading the same propaganda than a group of people who thinks you're subhuman and need to be eradicated. Congratulations on being a fully fledged idiot.

Here you are, throwing pebbles at someone who is operating at least 50 IQ points above your ceiling. You’re still playing in the ideological kiddie pool, oblivious to what's about to happen to you. When the inevitable purge comes and it’s coming soon, evil will devour it's own. Let me educate you, Naziism and Zionist-Frankism are not opposites; they are mirror images. Both were birthed from the same Sabbatean-Illuminist womb, funded by the same bastard banking dynasties, and deployed to herd populations into blood sacrifices for empire. One played the role of the sadistic butcher, the other the aggrieved victim, two masks, one face. The dialectic was always theater, designed to consolidate control and destroy organic leadership among nations. I am not on either side of that false binary. I can trace my lineage back to Ghibelline Grandees, to families who once ruled by divine right, and who would rather burn the chessboard than submit to Frankist parasites. Our bloodline predates their degenerate cult and will outlast it.

[aeltri]

Hi, it's me again. Thank you for your last response.

Reviewing Ben's marriage timeline, I think everything from the announcement of his engagement to the wedding itself felt incredibly rushed and sudden. He announced the engagement practically at the peak of his career. Was rushing into the engagement part of a campaign for an Oscar?

Before the engagement news broke, there were media reports about him meeting with several women. He ultimately chose Hunter. Was this his own active choice, or did Hunter choose him?

I hope my questions aren't bothering you.

Andrew and David Birkin have been the primary Programmers and Handlers for both Benedict Cumberbatch and Sophie Hunter since childhood. They performed Twinning, a type of TBMC where Alters of Systems belonging to two Assets are linked psychologically for later exploitation.

Lydia Hearst appears to have played a similar initiatory role as Kinvara Balfour with both acting as transitional social vectors to pull Ben into certain elite circles. It's also been heavily implied that Adam Ackland, Billy Lazarus, Tertius Bune, Ed Smith, and "Frank" have doubled as Ben's Handlers. Most of the women he was linked to including public “girlfriends” were also Handlers and/or Beards. Kinvara poached Ben’s LA network and dumped him which is a textbook Handler hand-off. Olivia was a soft Handler who genuinely liked him but hurt him in order to drive him away because her assignment had ended. Misty Upham, a rare, real friend was abruptly cut off and silenced after the Miss Golden Globe gala rape incident. Harvey Weinstein warned Ben to stay away from her and he complied. There was also a Sami woman who gave him a reindeer leather and pewter bracelet, that genuine bond was also severed.

It leaked that Cunter's father, Charlie Hunter had leveraged his Groucho Club connections to get her to read at Letters Live during Wilderness Festival. Her uncle, Julius Drake also extended an invitation to Ben for his piano rehearsal, ensuring a public overlap. Shortly after, Ben and Cunter appeared at the French Open shadowed by Julius Drake and Belinda Gow. This also points to a probable connection to Ross Gow, who has served as a Fixer for both Ghislaine Maxwell and Prince Andrew. Cunter’s family could have leveraged Prince Andrew, whom she would have known biblically as an Epstein Girl. Prince Andrew may have abetted Cunter in retaliation for Ben turning down Princess Beatrice for a fauxmance earlier on. We also know that Harvey Weinstein loved fauxmances and probably saw Cunter as a way to push Ben into promoting 'The Imitation Game' on his terms. Weinstein also wanted to scapegoat Ben for the Rosie Joy Glover babymama fiasco. Weinstein set him up and let media insinuations hang over Ben’s head, ensuring control. Vicky Zaza’s presence during the transitional moments before his capitulation reinforces the Handler hand-off pattern, keeping him surrounded by compromised intermediaries. It's no coincidence that she, Kinvara Balfour, and Cunter were seen hanging out together prior to the planted engagement announcement in The Times. So, to answer your question did Ben “choose” Sophie? No. Did Sophie “choose” Ben? Not exactly. This was a Birkin-Hunter clan co-production decades in the making. It was a ritualized contractual transfer under a hard deadline to prevent Ben from becoming more autonomous.

[aeltri]

Hi! I've read most of your posts about bc, but I have some confusion regarding the matter of his son(s). You mentioned that his son is actually Weinstein's love child. Are all three of them? If not, where did the other children come from?

Thank you in advance for your answer.

Hi Nonny, great question and you’re absolutely right to seek clarity because the truth behind those kids is twisted. Yes, two of the boys are twins and they are apparently Harvey Weinstein and Rosie Joy Glover's biological children. She falsely claimed that Ben was going to be a dad after a brief fling (which, if you do the math, happened after conception). It was around the time that Georgina Chapman threatened to divorce Harvey over a pregnant sidepiece, so it all tracks. That deception was baked into the entire PR pie from the beginning. These are the kids who suddenly appeared right after the fauxmance launch and were later used to reinforce the “family man” branding.

However, only one of the twins could be used for public deployment, "Kit". The other boy, whom we’ll call “Kat,” has been deliberately kept out of the spotlight. I strongly suspect that he is being groomed and transitioned into a cult androgyne role. Interestingly, we caught a glimpse of the actual father of "Hal", a dark bearded man, during a FaceTime leak. So that confirms there's awareness behind the scenes that Ben is just a frontman, and it may even be used to blackmail or control him. As for the third kid "Finn", that’s the murkiest one. Based on visual differences, timing, and leaks, it’s very likely this kid was sourced potentially via Ukraine, where "lookalike" procurement is a known tactic among elite circles (particularly during wartime displacement). Whether it was IVF using partial DNA and a surrogate or a doppelgänger adoption is still unclear. It is important to note that Cunter can't be a donor because she has CAIS which renders her completely sterile. What is clear is that none of the Rent-a-Kids are who people think they are, and this arrangement serves multiple purposes: humiliation, control, money laundering, and as a child trafficking cover. This is a tangled, dark web they’ve spun, and unfortunately, Ben got stuck in it.

[aeltri]

I think my instincts are echoing what many fellow longtime fans are feeling, especially those of us who supported the MCU from Phase 1. The push to replace beloved legacy characters with rushed, underdeveloped successors (while shaming dissent as “problematic”) has clearly backfired. If this report is legit, Robert Downey Jr. finally refusing to play ball could be a massive signal that even the most high-profile Talent is done being bullied by corporate mafia tactics. The formulaic DEI checkboxes aren’t the only problem; bad writing, corporate cynicism, and soulless IP mining are. When diversity is used as a smokescreen for creatively bankrupt content, nobody wins; not the audience, not the actors, not even the supposed “representational causes.”

There’s also a real, growing concern across the whole entertainment industry over Talent being forced to sign away digital likeness rights for AI clones or deepfakes. Studios are gearing up to own perpetual versions of their image, voice, and performance style. They're not above using kompromat as leverage, especially when you consider how embedded intelligence-adjacent entities are with Big Tech, the WEF, and media conglomerates. RDJ has always been seen as one of the more independent thinkers in Hollywood, someone who clawed back from cancellation before it was even called that. If they try to trap him into signing over his digital twin, that could blow the lid off a much darker reality facing all Talent in the age of AI contracts and virtual cloning.

[aeltri]

[aeltri]