agra3bnat-com
agra3bnat-com
افلام للكبار فقط 18
2K posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
For individual red areas, apply 1% hydrocortisone cream to calm inflammation, he suggests. "The quicker you soothe inflammation, the less potential damage the skin will experience." As for any open wounds or raw skin, treat it the same way you would treat a thermal burn: Apply an over-the-counter antibiotic ointment like bacitracin ($5; amazon) to the individual area—this will form a protective seal and prevent it from getting infected, says Dr. Zeichner. But if you develop a blister, make sure to leave the roof intact because it protects the underlying raw skin from the environment and acts like a natural bandage, he adds.
2 notes · View notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
barrier, Dr. Zeichner tells Health. Take care to avoid harsh scrubs and exfoliators, since this could further irritate your skin. After, gently apply a light moisturizer to help repair the damaged skin barrier and replace lost hydration. Steer clear of heavy ointments since they tend to trap heat and prevent the skin from cooling down, Dr. Zeichner says, and choose products that contain soothing ingredients like aloe vera instead.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
barrier, Dr. Zeichner tells Health. Take care to avoid harsh scrubs and exfoliators, since this could further irritate your skin. After, gently apply a light moisturizer to help repair the damaged skin barrier and replace lost hydration. Steer clear of heavy ointments since they tend to trap heat and prevent the skin from cooling down, Dr. Zeichner says, and choose products that contain soothing ingredients like aloe vera instead.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
A sunburn affects the skin in a similar way that a burn from the oven does, says Joshua Zeichner, MD, director of cosmetic and clinical research in dermatology at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. "The skin barrier becomes disrupted and inflamed, and there is injury to skin cells themselves." So, if you develop a sunburn, you actually want to take care of the skin from the outside in and the inside out, he adds.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
So when the filmmaker asks, “If processed meats are labeled the same as cigarettes, how is it even legal for kids to be eating this way?” he clearly didn’t understand the WHO’s read of the research. (To be fair, a lot of other media outlets got the WHO warning wrong too.) 2) Eating an egg a day is as bad as smoking five cigarettes. This claim that equates eating eggs with one of the most
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
What’s more, the WHO did not say that eating meat was as deadly as smoking. Rather, it determined that the strength of the evidence linking processed meats to colorectal cancer is similar to the strength of the evidence linking tobacco and cancer, meaning there’s convincing data here. This certainly doesn't mean that eating processed meat is as bad for you as smoking. It means that according to the agency's assessment, the links between processed meat and certain types of cancer are well-established.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
.A person's lifetime risk of colorectal cancer is about 5 percent, and eating processed meat every day appears to boost a person’s absolute risk of cancer by 1 percentage point, to 6 percent (that’s 18 percent of the 5 percent lifetime risk). So enjoying the odd strip of bacon or salami sandwich isn’t going to change your lifetime cancer risk, but eating the stuff every single day could increase your risk of this one particular cancer by a single percentage point.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
 Eating processed meats is as bad for you as smoking. In a gross distortion of the World Health Organization’s 2015 review of the link between processed meat and cancer, Andersen claims WHO sees bacon as a food on par with cigarettes and asbestos when it comes to causing cancer, and that eating a daily serving of the stuff increases your colorectal cancer risk by 18 percent.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
What the Health cherry-picks and misreports studies to make the case for veganism What the Health is part of a genre of food documentaries (and diet books) that selectively analyze nutrition research to demonize particular foods and praise a particular diet. In this case, Andersen cherry-picks studies about nutrition and often exaggerates their findings or reports them out of context, to drive home his case for veganism. Let’s run through a few examples:
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
What the Health cherry-picks and misreports studies to make the case for veganism What the Health is part of a genre of food documentaries (and diet books) that selectively analyze nutrition research to demonize particular foods and praise a particular diet. In this case, Andersen cherry-picks studies about nutrition and often exaggerates their findings or reports them out of context, to drive home his case for veganism. Let’s run through a few examples:
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
Most of us could stand to eat more fruits and vegetables and less meat and dairy, and a plant-based diet is a healthy choice for many people. But with messages like “drinking milk causes cancer” or “eating eggs is as bad as smoking cigarettes,” this film isn’t going to right our health problems. It confuses what’s known in science and obscures the truths of nutrition that could actually help us live healthier lives.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
of vegan and animal rights–friendly health professionals rather than a more balanced roster of experts, and engages in silly gotcha journalism to suggest organizations like the American Diabetes Association intentionally the truth about diet.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
But Andersen’s film fails on several accounts, and cranks the food fear sirens to irresponsibly high levels. He mischaracterizes and overstates what we know about how particular foods drive disease, by offering a narrow view of the science with cherry-picked studies to support his views. He also seeks out a slew
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
But Andersen’s film fails on several accounts, and cranks the food fear sirens to irresponsibly high levels. He mischaracterizes and overstates what we know about how particular foods drive disease, by offering a narrow view of the science with cherry-picked studies to support his views. He also seeks out a slew
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
intention was to explain the link between diet and
disease and help Americans make healthier food choices. And there’s no doubt we are in the midst of obesity, diabetes, and heart disease epidemics driven in part by the kinds of food we eat in the
quantities in which we eat them.
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
intention was to explain the link between diet and
0 notes
agra3bnat-com · 3 years ago
Text
0 notes