ankhmeanswomb

[ankhmeanswomb]

Source

[ankhmeanswomb]

Necrophilia Explained, Or, Trust Your Perceptions’ Unifying Theory of Standard Male Bullshit

DUDES ARE DOOMED (PART II): SPERM IS TANKING

THE STARS OF THE SHOW (PART III)

MALE BULLSHIT STORIES: PART IV (PART IV)

MALE BULLSHIT STORIES: PORN (PART V)

[ankhmeanswomb]

Source

[ankhmeanswomb]

i wish individualism was more fuelled by a desire for self-improvement rather than forming an ego.

[ankhmeanswomb]

My hero, and a perfect example of the Higher Self operating within a person. My healing journey and ascension towards real truth began with Vivienne Lamb.

Source

[ankhmeanswomb]

4b women (single, childfree, not sexually/romantically involved with males) should be working towards independence from the herd, amassing wealth and power, and building a quality life for herself. Let man and woman eat each other alive. Stay out of their drama.

[ankhmeanswomb]

Living a nonspiritual life is suicidal and backwards. Treating the flesh as though it just popped up out of nowhere rather than being a product of a complex chain of evolution/devolution within a cycle of samsara, is really quite myopic. Spirituality is the ONLY thing that exists on the planet, everything else is Maya/illusion filtered through the five senses. Only God matters in the end. This 90-year (if you're lucky, lol) lifespan ain't shit.

[ankhmeanswomb]

[ankhmeanswomb]

Why I don’t do anything for free and Why you shouldn’t either.

the concept of altrusim and selflessness is yet another burden women have been made to carry. But let’s dissect it today because I personally believe nothing is for free and no human in this world ever does something out of true altruism, in other words, the concept itself is a myth, propaganda dare I say. A carrot on a stick sold to women to tie them into unfavourable relationships.

You may think you’re an altruist, you may think that you help people and expect nothing in return, but this idea has always sounded silly to me, because you are indeed receiving something for your kindness, or rather—effort. Whether that may be gratitude, status, perspective or just a warm and fuzzy feeling. You have gained something from the exchange. Therefore you didn’t do it for free. So why then, now that we’ve established that nothing is done for free, do you feel guilty for expecting something in return for your actions?

Humans are transactional through and through, every relationship is, whether you like to admit it or not, and it’s not wrong to see it and benefit from it. Women are often expected to be selfless and give out free labour, and it’s such a painfully obvious and poorly disguised strategy to use them. Men don’t think like this, they know everything is an exchange, they know everyone is a resource.

You wanna start winning? Stop playing fair in an unfair world. Stop clinging to these lies of moral superiority and kindness. That’s not how humans work, that’s not how you work. Stop lying to yourself. The sooner you realise this the better.

I am not saying you should exploit people, not because I care about the morality of it, but because if you are not already in a position of power, it will most likely bite you in the ass—the more debts you own, the more vulnerable you are.

I am however saying that you, much like men, should start seeing people for what they offer you, for their potential usefulness, people are assets, resources. Help people, but never for free, and if they help you, you return the favour. Be the person who knows someone that knows someone. That is how society works, and you are loosing out if you don’t operate like this as well. What did that one guy say? Righteousness is the tool the weak use to control the powerful.

[ankhmeanswomb]

Understanding God

Think of a large piece of fabric that is, or seems, endless.. it is then cut and formed into various individual pieces of clothing.. One piece is cut and formed into a t-shirt, another into a pair of pants, another into a sundress.

They all come from the same piece of fabric but they take on the shape and form of a seemingly separate object to experience existence as thag object. That is how God is. The artist that is not separate from Its art. God is the fabric and we are the pieces of cloth formed from it.

[ankhmeanswomb]

The Rebirth of the sacred fluid through the royal chambers of the body and into the throne of God.

[ankhmeanswomb]

About dating

About the 2 first videos : we really need to start appreciating men's honesty lol. These videos basically sum up what men think of sex : an act to make sure the woman getting fucked becomes his property ('marking his territory') and that, as a consequence, it is degrading for the woman ('I have so much respect for that').

Coming straight from the horse's mouth, yet females will tell you that you are misogynistic if you say the same things.

About the 3rd video : women are delusional as hell. Do they really think that a man giving them the time of the day and paying for everything on a date is a benevolent act ? Do they really think that men are spoiling them because they enjoy their company ? Do women seriously think that men would pay for everything while expecting nothing in return ? Lol yes sweetie, dating is prostitution. You are waiting for him to pay for everything so logically, he expects you to give him your coochie. Dating has always been transactional, just like marriage and relationships are in general.

About the 4th video : why do women go to random men's houses on their first date ? You do not know the guy, yet you think that it is a good idea to go to his crib ??

About the 5th video : classic example of women not heeding to warnings and then complaning that they end up being abused.

I stumbled across these videos and they perfectly sum up everything that is wrong with women : not respecting men's honesty, being delusional and thinking that they freely deserve 'the princess treatment", making stupid decisions, not trusting their gut instincts nor listening to other people's warnings... These women severely lack intelligence. But after all, women are adamant on one thing : that being rewarded with male validation is worth putting themselves at risk. It trumps everything. That is why, even though they need to take a ridiculous number of precautions to go on a date (sending their friends their location, meeting somewhere public, not drinking more than one to two drinks), they are still willing to on dates... And this is what foids will refer to when they say : 'y'all are just JeaLouS of us getting male attention".

[ankhmeanswomb]

textbook misogynists larping as feminists never cease to tuck tail and run when women theyre bullying and harassing refuse to back down

they flee like maggots running from bleach.

they refuse to engage with women who are loud and proud, who will bite their heads off for daring to try and silence them.

just like males, they tremble in submission to those who are more dominant than them, and jump at every and any chance to abuse people they see as below them.

it's been hours since i posted about how much i hate these fake radfems causing numerous mutuals to deactivate and hide. not a single fucking peep from the crowd thats sending dozens of rape threats and death threats to 18 year olds. i wonder why that is. almost like you KNOW im not going to take your bullshit and im not going to leave this blog just because you have an issue with it.

you people are beyond cowardly. you people are beyond degenerate. you people are beyond class and grace.

you deserve less than the shit on the bottom of my shoe.

sincerely, a woman BEGGING you all to come for me.

[ankhmeanswomb]

Did you know Tesla once built a device so powerful it was nicknamed the “earthquake machine”? It was called the Earth Oscillator.

A Resonance Machine That Shook the World

In the late 1890s, Nikola Tesla developed a device he believed could demonstrate one of the most powerful and misunderstood forces in physics: mechanical resonance. Known today as the Earth Oscillator, this machine was small in size—but immense in implication.

It was not electrical. It did not spark or glow.

It pulsed.

The Invention

Tesla’s Earth Oscillator was a steam-powered mechanical device, no larger than a shoebox, which used a piston and lever system to generate rhythmic impulses. When clamped to a structure, it would begin vibrating at a low amplitude. As it continued, and as Tesla tuned it closer to the structure’s natural frequency, the effect would build—slowly, then violently.

This is the essence of mechanical resonance: when frequency aligns, energy accumulates.

Tesla’s early demonstrations began as controlled experiments, but they quickly escalated in scale and consequence.

The Manhattan Incident

One of the most infamous episodes involving the Earth Oscillator occurred at Tesla’s New York City laboratory in the late 1890s.

Tesla attached the device to a steel column in his building and began tuning. Within minutes, nearby buildings began to shake. Cracks appeared in plaster. Windows trembled. Panicked citizens spilled into the street, believing an earthquake had struck the city. Police were dispatched.

Tesla, realizing the effect had gone too far, smashed the device with a sledgehammer before responders could arrive. In recounting the story, he said:

“In a few minutes I could have laid that building flat. And, with a dozen of my oscillators, I could drop the Brooklyn Bridge in short order.”

Whether exaggerated or not, the incident served as a visceral demonstration of the Earth Oscillator’s potential.

Not a Generator—A Tuning Fork for the Planet

Unlike electrical generators, the Earth Oscillator did not produce voltage. It produced force through frequency.

Tesla theorized that such a device, scaled and properly tuned, could couple with the Earth itself. He believed mechanical pulses could travel vast distances through the crust—just as seismic waves do. If the oscillator matched the Earth’s natural harmonics, localized energy or communication systems could be activated anywhere on the globe.

He called it the beginning of a new class of machines—“vibratory transmitters.”

A Tool or a Weapon?

Tesla openly admitted the dual nature of the device. It could power machinery or move tectonic plates. He imagined it as a precision demolition tool—capable of bringing down steel bridges or skyscrapers without explosives.

“Resonance,” he warned, “can destroy anything if continued long enough.”

He also knew it could be weaponized. A scaled version could, in theory, trigger localized seismic activity if geological conditions were right. He emphasized that such a use would be highly irresponsible—but physically plausible.

No public record exists of Tesla ever using the device on natural terrain or in warfare-related experiments. However, his own accounts leave little doubt that he saw the danger.

Suppression and Legacy

The Earth Oscillator never went into production. It was too unpredictable. Too misunderstood. And perhaps, too powerful.

In the industrial world’s race toward controllable electrical infrastructure, Tesla’s vibratory experiments were deemed impractical, even dangerous. Funding was redirected. Patents expired. The oscillator was abandoned.

Today, no working replica survives. Only diagrams, eyewitness reports, and Tesla’s own words remain.

Yet its core principle—that force can be transmitted, amplified, and even weaponized through frequency—continues to echo through the fields of engineering, acoustics, and geophysics.

The Earth Oscillator was a frequency machine—simple in form, profound in implication.

It revealed that the world is not held together by solidity alone, but by rhythm.

That resonance is not an abstract concept—it’s a power source. A tool. A risk.

And in Tesla’s hands, it became a momentary glimpse of how the world might be moved—not by force, but by frequency.

[ankhmeanswomb]

The Holy Grail was never a cup outside of you, It was a vessel of the Divine Light within you.

Your skull is the chalice

Your neck is the stem

Your spine is the base

The third eye is the nectar that overflows

Illuminating the temple of God within the brain.

The Grail holds the sacred essence of consciousness

The elixir of divine remembrance

The substance of eternity itself.

To drink from it is to awaken

To pierce the veil of illusion

And see with the Eye of the Infinite.

The quest for the Holy Grail is not a journey across lands, It is a return to inner awakening, A quest to find your true identity as consciousness.

This is the Grail Mystery

Hidden in plain sight, Encoded in the very architecture of your being.

The body is the temple

The mind is the altar

And the spirit is the flame that never dies.

𓂀 Seek within

And you shall find the Grail you’ve been chasing all along

-Revival Of Wisdom

[ankhmeanswomb]

Previous anon again - I was wonder what's your take on the pervasive mother/whore dichotomy regarding the divine feminine? In practically every culture, the goddesses are associated with motherhood and/or sexuality. The only goddess I can think of that doesn't have anything to do with either is Athena. Maybe it's because humans can only understand the feminine through those lens (utility and subjugation), but I am interested to hear what you think about it.

Since the human ego's forte is to utilize one another to meet personal ends, its no surprise that so many "goddesses" are nothing but sex-tools. The image deified by the individual is a representation of that which the individual finds holy within themselves. There are of course exceptions to the rule like Ishtar/Innana and Wadjet/Nekhbet which come from the much more ancient world prior to the Hermetic gender divide and they likely have a far more ancient origin. There was a time that the sun was also considered "feminine", and terms like Saulė were used to describe it. The moon took on a masculine identification through the word Menulis which was originally the feminine Menulė anyway. There was a history of dual goddesses being identified with the polarities of nature and the celestial bodies. This was during times when the feminine was the singular transcendental force. The Greek and roman world is not truly worth looking at because it all went downwards to the very pits of hell from there onwards. The farther back you look the more of the parthenogenic truth you'll find. Greek and roman sovereign women and the goddesses identified with them are few and far between. Just look what happened to Hypatia of Alexandria, who was not only intellectual but also asexual. One must only look at how intelligent people are treated in a society to understand that their spiritual system is equally null and moot. The modern world also imposes the idea that ancient goddess images were nothing but "p0rn0graphic" images of birth givers, when they were truly humanized depictions of cosmic consciousness/self generation (parthenogenesis).

[ankhmeanswomb]

The return of ancient knowledge