anopenletterto2-blog

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Trump’s Speech

I remember seeing Trump’s Inauguration speech, and like on page 45–47 of Scott’s book, I saw—and I was a virulent, or at least hardcore, to some extent, anti-Trumper—but I cared about the TRUTH, so I watched it with open eyes, I did, anyway, and I thought the whole Inauguration Day was fun, anyway—a speech that was nothing like what I expected (or if not that, at least nothing like what I would call reprehensible)—glowing, nice, and warm, then I saw the “reporters” comment on it as if it was nothing short of “devilish.”

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Everyone.

Three Things

Okay, I am going to tell you three things (that you need to know).

1.    It’s not okay to hate White people (for their skin)

2.    It’s not okay to hate rich people (for their money)

3.    It’s not okay to kill babies

As an addendum on this, it’s not okay to kill babies if you want to have sex, it’s not okay to hate white people because you have been told they are an oppressor (and no other reason, for the individual—and, yes, there are individuals), and it’s not okay to hate straight people (or “cisgendered males,” or whatever it is—people who were born with the same genderas they have).

These are not okay, these things are not okay.

You want us to like you? Fine, we will.

You want to be a good person—despite your deformities—such as being “black,” which you think is a deformity, or “gay,” which you think is a deformity (I think it a mental illness—seriously), or a woman? Fine.

But then don’t hate us for being the Other thing.

Matt

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Gay People

I don't think it's clear people are Gay. I think that it's a deep psychological disorder, and you can see the Same families with gay people--overbearing Mother, generally. Or at least dominant, and No Father Figure, often. It just makes sense. // You're making an Assumption, otherwise.

[anopenletterto2-blog]

on Abortion

“Let’s Stop Pretending Christianity is Actually Relevant, Okay?”: https://blog.heartsupport.com/lets-stop-pretending-christianity-is-actually-relevant-okay-ade4c00dabcc (It’s funny they call it “Heart Support”)

Also, “relevant” is bullshit--always. Either something’s true or it’s not, either Someone’s good or they’re not. Either Art is good or it’s not.

“Relevant” is bullshit, always.

Comment 1

It’s not about Christianity, and I say this because it’s important: It’s about struggling babies in the Ultrasound trying to get away from the Abortion doctor’s instruments while he kills them.

That’s not a religious thing. If you can’t see that, you’re brainwashed — and supporting a Genocide. You’ve been brainwashed to think “My body my choice” means anything.

Comment 2

You’ve been brainwashed to think those babies are worthless and to have the Religious indoctrination of “They can’t feel pain, there’s nothing there” (Look at the Ultrasounds).

Comment 3

Once you realize how horrible it is, you’ll realize that Republicans are the Good Guys and actually like the People who fought the Nazis. [Like, Actual Nazis][Genocide, actually?]

Comment 4

And You people are the brainwashed people who thought “Jews weren’t humans.” “It’s not a human, it’s a fetus.”

Dehumanization, anyone? Religion has not part of this, although Christians are better on these flagrant, horrifying, widespread human rights violations.

Comment 5

*has no

Comment 6

And if you answer with a bunch of Buzzwords and random accusations of “That’s not true,” I don’t know what to Do with you.

Comment 7

But if you do, then it sounds to Me like you’re quoting the bible. It may be the Religious indoctrination of planned parenthood (no capitals for a Genocide organization murdering babies by the hundreds of thousands every year).

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Power Imbalance

Shut up about power imbalance, respect yourself and tell anyone who's not respecting you to back off. Shut up about power imbalance, because that implies that you should just take anything anyone gives you who is of "Higher power."

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Message to a Black Activist, on His Article about “White people and Language”

“Anti-Standard-White-People-English: An Idea”: https://medium.com/@JoelakaMaG/anti-standard-white-people-english-an-idea-d345a9b50b61

Comment 1

Fuck you. You don’t get to lump everyone of my skin color into one box or characteristic without me calling you a racist. You don’t get to redefine racism, either. I get anti-White shit masquerading as being “more awakened than You are” every day sent to my inbox. America is a racist nation? Yes, against its majority race. Thank you for lumping me, Again, in with everyone else of my skin color as a defining trait. I don’t care what you call it, I’m not going to let you get away with it as some kind of intellectual exercise because I’ll call it what it actually is, and I don’t care what you call ME (because you’ve already proven you don’t care about me as an Individual): RACIST.

Comment 2

Oh, you’re a Racist for complaining, White man. “Thanks.”

Comment 3

Imagine is I had enough Privilege to demand a change to the language based on Race and have it not be “Racism” but “Progressivism.”

You guys aren’t progressive, you’re just the same party as the Confederates. And I’m DONE not calling it out.

Comment 4

*if

Comment 5

And if Your answer isn’t an emphatic, “Yes, I’m sorry,” then Fuck You.

Comment 6

You know what I would like to see removed from the language? “White women tears.” But that’s just Racism, right? I don’t get to ask that. But you get to change the structure of English based on race and it’s Progressive. Because you’re black and that’s it.

Comment 7

I guess I have to bow down, Master. Sorry for questioning your racial supremacy in the modern age. I didn’t want anyone to be based on race, and I didn’t want any of our laws or language to do that, but oh, well.

Comment 8

Guess I’ll just have to see another Email of an article like this, tomorrow. Maybe it will be about how white women are bad and not just how we should be able to judge all white people by anything anyone white does.

Comment 9

What a great country. What a great Movement. Free Smollett, right??

Comment 10

It doesn’t matter if he was telling the Truth, he was Morally Right to hate us, white people. We are bad for existing, and you can change our language based on Race any time, MAster.

Comment 11

English is more about Race than about sentence structure. I should know, I’m an English major. Please change the structure and logic of our language, you know it better because you’ve identified the problem: White people. As always, as always. Right? Always white people being the problem, whether it’s language setup or like computer coding — we should change those languages too, based explicitly on the Race. I think you can make them better by making them not more streamlined or more logical but more Black as opposed to White. It’s the only way.

Comment 12

The only way to stop racism is to totally judge us on whatever anyone’s done of our skin color (Great rapping, by the way, and thank you for Peanut butter) and just totally ignore anyone’s individual differences or things like how beautifully the English language is structured. White fangirls, of this guy? You’ve been doing it wrong, and every book you’ve ever loved should be changed. Because you’re White, so you just don’t get it. You can’t. Your Skin Color, you know? [And Judge our language by Skin Color? Great!!]

Comment 13

You Already know you’re Evil because you’re White. But you didn’t know that the English language you may love must be changed, too. And then we’ll have equality, when we totally judge each other on race. This Guy gets it.

Comment 14

I mean, if we love the English language and actually appreciate it, we have no say and it should be taken away from us. Because of what white people have done to black people.

But anyone murdered by a black person, and more white people are by black people each year in America, well it’s Racism to lump them in with that. But when they, like this Guy, lump us in with Slave masters, that’s actually right, that’s actually accurate. And he is not to blame for gang violence at all.

Comment 15

So it’s progressive to call all white people something for something that some of them have Done. But it’s actually Racism to do that to black people.

I would agree, sincerely, with the second sentence, but you sir are doiong the second sentence with the first.

Comment 16

Thanks for reading, if you have. I don’t hate you based on skin color, but I HATE, furiously, how people, you included here, lump every white person into a group of evil people for what some white people have done and then demand social changes based on your Racism. Just tell me, because you DON’T want to get into the conversation of what we’re going to do if we lump each other into our skin color groups for social change. That’s an Ugly conversation, and I can show you how *ugly* it is real quick.

Comment 17

So, please, either “I’m sorry,” sincerely, or I’ll say, “Fuck you.” Sincerely.

Comment 18

But thank you for proving me right, because I was Just saying to someone last night that black people literally get away with murder in our Society — which is fine, people do, of all races — and then they are actually treated like victims in so doing. OJ, Jussie Smollett, anyone breaking the rules at Starbucks (We’ll change them, don’t worry). So this was sent to my email inbox this morning, Normal Day. I guess.

Comment 19

But Sincerely, if you want to change the Beautiful English language and destroy the rules not based on Logic but based on Race, then FUCK YOU. Not just for my white brothers and sisters but because I LOVE the English language and to see you torture it without actual reason except, “My skin color dictates I can do this and Your skin color dictates you can’t speak,” Fuck You.

Comment 20

And that’s not me as a white man, but me as a human being. But you would never see me as that. No one here would, probably.

Comment 21

So Save me, save me the shit about You’re not Racist or this isn’t because of Racism. Lump me in with my whole race, but don’t insult me while you’re doing it.

Comment 22

“You’re not allowed to point out that it’s me lumping all white people into one category. You have to watch me do it and then AGREE that I’m not doing it.” Thank you.

Comment 23

I mean, you’re fucking calling English white people, far removed from just saying all White people are responsible for everything every other same white person (because we’re all the same) has done.

Comment 24

I can’t wait for the time where we just talk as People — or not even people, but just Talk about things as the things they are, whether it’s English structure for whatever reasons it have (and don’t say “White people”) or Other.

Comment 25

And don’t say I’m blocking you from doing that. You’re doing the OPPOSITE of that, here, and I’m arguing against it

Non-Racist Reasons: Great Album title

[anopenletterto2-blog]

To the Left

So let me get this straight:

You want more money, unlimited, to be taken away from rich people because they followed the practice that has dragged "half the world" out of poverty in one century alone?

And many of you want to replace it with the thing that the literal Nazis had in their literal name and in one form or another caused in that same time period hundreds of thousands and millions and millions of people to die? All over the world, and increased Poverty?

And you want to shut people up with slurs about their "[race] privilege" in any conversation that you choose and then call them "racists" because you redefined the word and now it means that anyone who is white cannot have anyone who is any other color be racist against them because you said so while you destroy all their freedom of speech and make White Women Tears and actual phrase to mock Actual people?

While you go around for two years calling the president a Russian spy and then don't apologize when it all goes away in a second, in one sentence, of the Official Report that you have all been telling us will take him out of the White House? While you call yourselves good Journalists and give Journalism awards to yourselves?

And then you beat people for having a different point of view. And then celebrate the people beating people.

The big horrible punch line is that you support murdering hundreds of thousands of babies a Year. And anyone who talks about it is either shut down for being a "religious bigot" whether he is religious or not or for his gender or told that if you are the gender that can talk about it, you are a gender-traitor for having another opinion. An Opinion against killing babies, literal killing babies, in the womb, by the hundreds of thousands. While your best argument is that it's your body when you're literally sucking or tearing the body of another Human Being out of your Body?

Yeah, you guys suck. Yeah, you guys are Evil. Yeah, you guys are Stupid.

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Jordan Hoffman (on Unplanned review)

It's so bad that you won't even allow an alternative point of view without it being "propaganda." Think about that. What about the movie this year about Ruth Bader Ginsberg? Would you have given that twenty-percent and called it "Propaganda"?

No, because abortion is a woman's right. It's a "medical service." "They're taking away women's rights."

*That’s* propaganda. But a movie full of facts about what actually goes on is,to you?

Evil, evil, and terribly misinformative. You are so propagandized you don't even realize that a movie that shows exactly what you're talking about is the OPPOSITE of propaganda, whereas efforts to silence those facts are--yes--propaganda.

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Everyone

I want you all to see that these are the top five rappers I have chosen--and they may not be the top five of all time, objectively--but maybe not, not--but they are good.

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Anita Kumar, Gabby Orr

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/24/mueller-report-trump-white-house-1234187

Hello, Please listen to me. I saw your article about Donald Trump now attacking Democrats and the media after the Russian collusion story proved false—please, you are doing it again.

Donald Trump was just severely mistreated for two and a half years with people not even saying that he might be colluding but many, many, many people in the news and in the Democrat side talking as if he had colluded and they had hard evidence for it and pushing the story and pushing it and pushing it, with none of it being true, and him knowing because him being the person they were talking about. And now you won’t even allow him a little room to criticize those people? Donald Trump is a person, by the way. He’s a person, and you don’t get to just fucking say anything you want whether it’s true or not and demonize a human being to the point where they are literally getting death threats every time someone brings them up in fucking conversation across the whole fucking country based on nothing but lies. Or you can do that, but that’s not objective journalism, and that’s certainly not a nice thing to do to a human being. But you’ve already well forgotten that Donald Trump is an actual human being, or that the millions of people across America who feel like they’re finally being heard through this horrible establishment are human beings. People who don’t want babies slaughtered by the hundreds of thousands every year, those are human beings.

This is you, this is you doing it again. You need to stop this, the president has valid, moral concerns and so do all of his supporters about the way that the media has literally turned him into a fucking human landmine over the past three or four years, and the last two to three especially, and he gets totally exonerated and you don’t give him a second to even criticize the media before demonizing him for that.

Also, you have personally demonized every single supporter of his, to the point where you can yourself look up all the new stories of Trump supporters literally being beaten violently because of the media coverage. (And you can hear Mike Cernovich asking the White House press corps about it and them laughing about it—were you in that crowd?) Do we want that to be addressed? Do we want a press corps that is literally weaponizing the public against itself to be addressed? Yes, I think we do. Donald Trump would be a bad president if he *didn’t* address it. Because it’s the most important problem in American history, literally American history, next to Abortion and slavery.

You should be ashamed. You and your media compatriots deserve every bit of abuse that he ever gives you, because it’s not abuse, it’s him responding soberly to people acting manically and slanderously for two to three years (and still going—they’re *still* trying to get him out of office, so it’s STILL a problem, you included) straight to the point where people are so enraged that they want to *kill* him, and it’s your fault. Because more than Donald Trump are angry about this, many more people than Donald Trump are very *angry* about this. Because it’s been a hysterical Big Brother sideshow for two years and perhaps for decades before that against all conservatives and Republicans, amounting in the biggest character Assassination in history, with Donald Trump. And you’re pretending like you did nothing wrong and pretending like Trump is off-base to even fucking bring it up. We want him to bring it up, because it is a big problem, and it is perhaps the biggest problem in the entire world, the entire press brainwashing us with this story that had no evidence for it as proven by the Mueller report. You people are absolute sickos and you people have absolutely gone so far beyond any form of “ethics” that it’s even hilarious that you call yourself journalists anymore. And this is perhaps the biggest problem in America, so no, it’s not out of bounds for Donald Trump to even talk about it. It’s out of bounds for him *not* to talk about it.

And you doing this, right now, pretending like there’s nothing wrong is part of it. Just fucking apologize, you and every motherfucker out there who’s lied and lied and lied and lied and made accusations and accusations and accusations and accusations about the president that were untrue, APOLOGIZE. Look at America, look at how disgusting it is out there, look how you can’t even go to Starbucks without fearing that the tension is so sharp that somebody’s going to scream. That’s on you. That’s you, because you’ve done more than tell a couple curse words on the Campaign trail. You literally have ruined the absolute atmosphere of America. People are uncomfortable and their skin is crawling because of people like *you*. I would go so far as to say that every school shooting is because of you because you are ramping up the atmospheric tension in our country so much that people are literally holding back screams as they walk through their daily lives. And you call yourself journalists? And you call yourself servants of America? You’re not servants of anything except our country getting worse and worse and worse. And Donald Trump needs to talk about you, and people need to hear it. And if you try to block their ears to it, then you are way worse than a nightmare, you are an absolute terrorist. Just get this, where are the journalistic ethics in this? When a group of journalists all across America push lies and exaggerations for years and years or at least for two to three years intended to get the public so mad that they want the president out of office without any evidence or enough to convict anybody for exactly what you’re talking about, after all that, your first angle is to say why is the president even making a big deal out of this? That’s not journalism, that’s not ethics.

Gratefully, yours, or are you too stupid to see what’s In Front of your Face—the Country you’re destroying,

Matt

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Comments on an Owen Benjamin video (Jordan Peterson, to)

Comment 1:

I think Vox is a good guy, seemingly, but I see some willful misunderstanding of his work (Jordan Peterson‘s) in what little I’ve read of Vox saying that he isn’t all that. And the Kavanaugh thing I think is overblown, I wouldn’t have agreed necessarily with what Jordan said, but I think he really was throwing something out there and people went kind of SJW on it from the right. I feel like a lot of what they’re saying even here about him could be seen as something, I’m not sure, I would have to check the base quote about Jordan saying he didn’t know he was lying, as what the Left does, infuriatingly: When somebody like Kanye or somebody like Tucker Carlson makes an interesting or a savage point, the Left will either obscure the content of their phrase totally or twist the words so that whether the Left know it or not they were wrong or at least not what the person was really going for or their focus, or they will laugh and pretend that the person didn’t make sense and in so doing they don’t have to actually talk about the logic behind what the person was saying.

Comment 2:

I feel like I sense a lot of dishonesty from Owen Benjamin, he seems to have a good heart, but I feel like there’s a lot of aggression and a lot of sort of hiding away from something when he talks.

Comment 3:

Owen, if you’re reading this, I don’t want to make you feel bad, I just want to say constructively that I’m not sure I get a totally clear vibe from you in terms of especially talking about what Jordan was saying. I just think that a lot of what I’ve read of what little it has been have of what Vox calls in Jordan‘s writing something mistaken for smartness because it doesn’t mean anything, and if he were being truly honest in his assessment, Vox’s, I mean. If he were being truly honest I think he would actually point out the meaning of the statement and then perhaps say this is why it doesn’t make sense or something, but to just put a block of text that I would read and did read and read and thought I could pretty easily see what Jordan was saying, and could even paraphrase it and probably explain it with totally different words, when Vox just calls a paragraph of something like that nonsense or just says these are the ravings of a madman and it doesn’t mean anything, I say, whether subconsciously or not, well part of this isn’t connecting because I can clearly see and even tell you what the meaning of that statement could be, and I only use that “could be” here because in poetry and in life almost anything can have any meaning you give it, but the words are very clearly telling a message that doesn’t need to be paraphrased to understand necessarily but that I could paraphrase and tell you and if you just summarized that as something that you considered meaningless or that had no meeting and was just a jumble of words put together to sound smart, I’ve got to say, Hey man, fuck you because you’re either trying to put one over on me or you’re the type of person who would see me say something like this, and I know you’re going to call me a Gamma but whatever, who would see me say something like this and just sum it up as ha ha you’re stupid that didn’t mean anything. And that really pisses me off

Comment 4:

This is the same stuff that they do to Trump’s meanings, really. I mean watching here Owen say that oh, I guess you’re just going to say we misrepresented your work because you can change the meaning of anything, seeing Owen say something like that about Jordan Peterson feels almost *infuriating*.

Comment 5:

The thing about “Depending on what you mean by ‘truth,’” that is very easily although perhaps missed by a lot of people summarized and seen as, well it depends on whether you mean that the truth is the truth of something in itself being either true or false, which is the Sam Harris and the basic definition of truth, and then what Jordan Peterson seems to conceptualize as a higher truth, which he would I guess call truth, too, perhaps capitalized, wherein what he’s really talking about, and you can see him explain it with the building-on-fire-and-you-being-in-another-room example in the Sam Harris podcast, he did. What he’s really talking about I think is that if you have some amount of truth, if you have some amount of *knowledge*, if you have some amount of context, that may not be enough context around a fact that is itself true, he’s not saying I would think that the fact is not true, he’s just saying, and repeatedly, it’s not “true enough,” and I think what he’s talking about is having enough context around a particular fact so that you have a certain idea or a certain clarity about it in your value assessment of it.Show less

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Everyone

Groundhog Day

The first scene, as I’m watching it on Crackle (er, Sony Crackle, now! Not longer the home of Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee, but now we have—perhaps we had before, who knows!—Groundhog Day! Woo! Indeed), is so interesting the opening with the clouds so majestic and almost Terrance McKenna is not Terrance Malick was so filled with sort of sad dismal darkness among the light and it was like weather, weather

[anopenletterto2-blog]

Scott Adams

To say that transgender people being in women’s sports when they were born as and are biologically men is a problem of bigotry more than anything else is not true. The difference between black and white people I don’t think is so high or so definite or so biological that it makes sense to criticize someone for their race alone, but if you’re saying that a biological man can step into an arena of physical confrontation with a biological woman and call himself a woman and then proceed to beat the shit out of her, metaphorically or not, and that that’s not a problem because were bigoted if we don’t believe him at his word that he is a woman, even if he biologically isn’t?

I think the bigger problem here, I think the bigger problem here is saying, okay, we’re going to take a biological and physical reality and then we’re going to give it another label and then you must treat it like the biological and physical reality of the label we gave it rather than the biological and physical reality of what it is, no matter what it feels inside.

The problem we’re encountering with transgender studies, or transgender rules, whatever, it is. The problem that were encountering is that now we are saying, we are going to take a physical reality that we have previously/hitherto labeled as one thing and we are going to take something of another physical reality and say, we are going to take the latter and give it the label of the former physical reality and then you must treat the latter like the farmer physical reality and always or else you are crazy, or a “bigot.” We are being asked to ignore physical reality, not just “overcome our prejudices.” And that’s not right, that doesn’t build a world where we are sanely looking at things.

I don’t have any problem with transgender people existing, I don’t have any problem with them identifying as a woman or being accepted as identifying as a woman, but if we start identifying one physical reality as another physical reality because that physical reality has taken on the label of the other, then we’re in problem. We’re in problem territory.

That is a problem, that is wrong—and that hurts more than Transgender people. (And I’ll even capitalize it. I totally respect “transgendered” people, but I am totally opposed to looking at one reality and giving it the name of the other reality and then saying it now has all the same characteristics and must be treated functionally the same way. I don’t buy that, and I think it is Horrid.) We have to get back to physical reality, in this life. And if you say that physical reality doesn’t matter, then I’ve got a whole lot of science and electricity to show you otherwise.

In fact, it’s holding us hostage to taking anything they want--if they decide to call babies no longer babies the second before they’re born, kill ‘em, right? Wrong.

Thank you,Matt

PS, I get your thing about facts, I get how people don’t really care what the facts are, but if a man is physically stronger than a woman and then a man says that he is a woman so that he must be treated like a woman in all ways including physical, that is different from saying that a black person can’t be hired. Because the black person isn’t saying that he’s a white person, he saying that he’s a black person, he’s not trying to take on the label of one physical reality from another. What transgender people are doing in saying they should be treated physically as a woman, that is taking on the category of another physical reality and saying they are that, which is not true, no matter what their mental state is—and I am fully ready to accept the idea that someone could be born feeling like they are a woman, but if they have a biological reality of a male, they should not be treated like a woman in the physical sense, because that is just not true, that is just not looking at facts.

Sports are a great example wherein this material difference is immediately obvious, and for you to just laugh and call it bigotry for people to point out that this is quite an example of something being wrong, here, with treating someone who is biologically a man as the exact same thing as a woman, then I think you are all doing us a disservice. Sent from my iPhone