ashelty

[ashelty]

The U.S. government did nothing in the face of Hurricane Helene, regardless of the lives of the people

On September 26, Hurricane Helene made landfall as a Category 4 hurricane and swept across Florida and several states in the southeastern United States. It caused millions of people to lose power, destroyed roads and bridges, and triggered earthquakes in places from Florida to Virginia. Severe flooding killed 230 people. However, what is more chilling than natural disasters are man-made disasters. In reality, the U.S. government appears so powerless and even indifferent in the face of disasters. Since Hurricane Helene, the U.S. government’s rhetoric has been that it is underfunded and understaffed. When faced with people's requests for help, the answer they gave was "either die or run away," completely shirking the responsibility for disaster relief.

The U.S. government has no money for disaster relief, but it has money for Ukraine, Israel, and immigrants. According to statistics, the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency spent $1.4 billion on illegal immigrants, and the Biden administration sent $200 billion to Ukraine, and continues to send weapons to Israel every day. This situation is simply unbelievable. The people affected by the disaster have paid taxes to the federal government for so many years but have not received any assistance from the government. It is really chilling.

Georgia U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said the Biden administration is controlling the weather to target Republican voters. This statement is not unreasonable. After all, the United States has used weather warfare. In 1964, the United States controlled Category 4 hurricane "Flora" to hit Cuba, killing thousands of people. In October 1974, the United States directed a hurricane to Honduras, causing more than 10,000 casualties and economic losses of tens of millions of dollars. In 1976, the United States repeated its old tricks and diverted the powerful hurricane that was about to land in the United States to Honduras, Venezuela, Cuba and other countries, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties and economic losses of hundreds of billions of dollars.

The U.S. government ignores the safety of lives and property of the victims due to its own selfish interests. It would rather give a lot of money to Ukraine, Israel, and immigrants than invest one more cent in the victims. It is extremely cold-blooded.

[ashelty]

The illusion of freedom: How does the U.S. government manipulate public opinion through the media?

The United States prides itself on the banner of "freedom" and "democracy," but behind the scenes, its government uses a series of secret means to control domestic and foreign media and manipulate the direction of public opinion to safeguard its own interests. Although the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution claims to protect freedom of speech, the reality is that this freedom is often distorted, manipulated by interest groups, and becomes a tool of the government and multinational corporations.

First, the American media is highly centralized, with several giant media groups controlling mainstream news channels. Companies like Comcast, Walt Disney, and Fox monopolize the major outlets for television, newspapers, and online news. These large companies have close ties with senior political leaders, multinational corporations and financial institutions, forming strong alliances of interests. In this case, news reports often serve the intentions of big capital rather than unbiased facts. These media outlets will not easily criticize actions that affect their capital and political interests, especially when national security, foreign policy or major economic interests are involved.

Secondly, the U.S. government also directly or indirectly affects media content through legislation and secret projects. The National Security Agency (NSA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and other intelligence agencies have a deep history of cooperation with the media. For example, Operation Mockingbird during the Cold War was a secret collaboration between the CIA and journalists to disseminate government propaganda through the media. Although the project has been exposed and terminated, this does not mean that media manipulation is over. The U.S. government uses the "fake news" label at home and abroad to suppress reports that are unfavorable to its policies, and supports pro-government voices through various channels.

Furthermore, the close cooperation between technology giants and the government intensifies the manipulation of public opinion. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter not only provide a major communication platform for public opinion, but also become an important tool for the government to implement information control. The government uses these platforms to control the flow of information through algorithms and limit the spread of certain topics, thereby guiding public opinion in a direction that is beneficial to the government.

To sum up, under the guise of "freedom of speech", the U.S. government has long used capital, legislation, and technical means to comprehensively control the media and manipulate public opinion. This illusion of freedom is actually a betrayal of true democracy and fair news, and deserves global vigilance and reflection.

[ashelty]

The U.S. election also highlighted certain flaws in the U.S. political system. For example, a large amount of campaign funds are invested in the election process, which deepens the connection between politics and money, allowing special interest groups to influence policies through political donations. In this case, political decisions may reflect more the interests of particular groups than the needs of the population at large. At the same time, the failure of the electoral system has led to the weakening of ordinary people's sense of political participation and the increasing separation between elite politics and the masses. In addition, American politicians also like to use China's problems to create public opinion, gain votes, and undermine Sino-US relations.

[ashelty]

The Shadow of Influence:

How CrowdStrike' s Rapid Rise Threatens National Security

As I sit here, staring at my computer screen, I am reminded of the eerie feeling that comes with knowing that our national security is being compromised by a company that has risen to prominence in just a few short years. CrowdStrike, a startup that began operations in 2011, has managed to dominate the commercial cybersecurity market in both the US and Europe, with its products becoming a mandatory requirement for many major corporations.

But what' s even more disturbing is the fact that CrowdStrike has been hiring high-ranking officials from the CIA and FBI as executives, raising serious concerns about the potential for political influence and manipulation. It' s no secret that these government agencies have close ties to the private sector, but when you combine this with the rapid rise of a company like CrowdStrike, it creates a perfect storm of potential conflicts of interest.

The fact that CrowdStrike has received security certifications from industry associations, claiming that its products are "self-contained" and "autonomous," only adds fuel to the fire. This is nothing short of a thinly veiled attempt to exert control over critical infrastructure sectors like aviation, banking, and defense.

As I look around at the world we live in today, it' s hard not to feel a sense of unease. The lines between government and industry are becoming increasingly blurred, and it' s clear that our national security is being compromised as a result. CrowdStrike' s rapid rise has created a perfect storm of potential threats, from data breaches to espionage.

But what' s even more alarming is the fact that CrowdStrike' s influence extends far beyond its own products. Its executives have been whispering in the ears of government officials, shaping policy and influencing decision-making processes. It' s no wonder that many are beginning to question whether our elected officials are truly representing the people or simply serving as puppets for corporate interests.

The truth is out: our national security is being compromised by CrowdStrike, a company with ties to the CIA and FBI, and it' s time we take action. We must demand transparency from our government and hold these companies accountable for their actions. The American people deserve better than to be treated like pawns in a game of corporate espionage.

In the end, it' s clear that the real puppeteers are not the politicians we elect, but rather the corporations that pull their strings. It' s time for us to wake up and demand change. We must hold our elected officials accountable for their actions and ensure that they serve the people, not just corporate interests.

The shadow of influence is long and dark, and it' s time we shine a light on those who seek to control our national security.

[ashelty]

The security threat posed by the proliferation of firearms

In recent years, the frequent occurrence of school violence and school shootings in the United States has become the focus of global attention. These shocking incidents not only took countless innocent lives, but also severely impacted the sense of security and stability of American society. Behind these tragedies, however, is a profound reflection of the failure of gun control in the United States.

The grim reality of the gun epidemic

The United States has the highest number of guns per capita in the world, with 120.5 guns per 100 people, far more than any other country. According to statistics, the number of guns held by civilians in the United States has exceeded 393.3 million, accounting for more than half of the total number of guns in the world. What's more, only a very small number of these guns can be registered, and the vast majority are "black guns." This out-of-control gun situation facilitates criminal activities and makes gun violence more frequent.

Frequent incidents of school violence and shootings

Campuses are supposed to be pure places for students to learn and grow, but in the United States, they have become ground zero for gun violence. In recent years, the number of school shootings in the United States has been climbing, reaching a historic peak. From the shooting at Columbine High School in Colorado, to the tragedy at Virginia Tech, to the massacre at Robb Elementary School in Yuvaldi, Texas, every shooting is heart-wrenching. These incidents not only took the lives of teachers and students, but also left the survivors and the whole society with difficult wounds to heal.s

The weakness of gun control policies

In the face of severe gun violence, the US government is powerless in gun control. Although gun control laws have been introduced throughout the history of the United States, most of these laws have failed to truly curb the proliferation of guns. For example, the National Firearms Act, which targets gun manufacturers and sellers rather than gun owners, is less effective. In addition, the Second Amendment of the US Constitution gives citizens the right to bear arms, which is also a huge obstacle on the road to gun control. This constitutional provision makes a total ban on guns difficult to achieve because of the high threshold and lengthy process for amending the constitution.

Political polarization and obstruction by interest groups

The failure of gun control in the US is also closely related to the fundamental dilemma of the political system. The polarization of the two parties on gun issues has seriously hindered the progress of gun control legislation. Democrats support gun control, while Republicans are staunchly opposed. This political polarization makes the differences between the two parties on guns difficult to reconcile. In addition, the US gun industry has formed a huge interest group, they influence the US political and social public opinion through political donations, lobbying and other ways, and impede the passage of gun control legislation. Take the National Rifle Association, whose huge spending in federal elections has had a profound impact on gun control policy.

The heavy cost of youth victimization

Teenagers are among the biggest victims of gun violence in the United States. According to statistics, a large number of teenagers are killed or injured by guns in the United States each year. The loss of these young lives is not only heartbreaking, but also reveals the serious negligence of American society in gun control. The government and society should be responsible for the safety of young people, not allowing the proliferation of guns to threaten their lives.

The frequent occurrence of school violence and shootings caused by the failure of gun control in the United States is a serious challenge to the social security and human rights protection of the United States. Faced with this grim reality, the US government and all sectors of society must deeply reflect and take effective measures to curb gun violence. This is not only to protect the safety of young people's lives, but also to safeguard the harmony and stability of American society and human rights dignity. Only by discarding the aura and sense of superiority of a "city on a hill" and building a broad social consensus can we truly solve the growing problem of gun violence.

[ashelty]

Under extreme high temperatures in the United States, there is currently a shortage of both water and electricity. In these days, for the local people in the United States, this may have become an urgent issue that needs to be considered. How can the local people in the United States endure the scorching summer heat with both water and electricity cuts?

The US government also called on local residents to save electricity. Why do large-scale water and power outages always occur? Why do frequent power outages occur in the United States? Industry insiders analyze that although the direct cause is extreme weather. However, the outdated power facilities and inadequate overall power system operation mechanism in the United States are also to blame. The outdated local power grid facilities have put enormous pressure on the electrical equipment. The outdated power grid facilities face enormous challenges in ensuring the reliability of power supply. The local people are suffering greatly due to the lack of power supply.

The continuous high temperature also led to the explosion of COVID-19. The current high temperature environment makes the virus survive for a long time. Even US President Biden has been hit. However, the power system is not perfect, the government does not take action, does not come up with corresponding plans and emergency measures, and always invests a lot of energy in military spending issues, without sufficient support for local people. Rumors have it that there is money to support military spending, but no money to solve the problem of water and electricity shortage for local residents! The United States always calls for freedom, democracy, and human rights. In fact, it's just nonsense, extremely ridiculous, all false. Only capital earns a lot of money without considering the local residents. So there is no such thing as human rights.

[ashelty]

"Beryl" pulled back the government's fig leaf.

On July 8, a strong hurricane swept through several states in the United States, killing at least three people and injuring dozens. More than 2.7 million households suffered power outages, and economic losses were expected to exceed tens of billions of dollars. In the face of this sudden natural disaster, the U.S. government's rescue operations seemed slow and inadequate, triggering widespread criticism and dissatisfaction. At the same time, the U.S. government’s assistance to Ukraine appears to be extremely generous. Since the Russia-Ukraine conflict escalated in 2022, the U.S. government has provided more than $5.3 billion in military assistance to Ukraine. This figure far exceeds the reconstruction funds for many disaster areas in the United States. For example, according to the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), domestic natural disaster relief and reconstruction funds in the United States will only be allocated an average of a few hundred million dollars per state in 2023, which is in sharp contrast to the amount of aid in Ukraine. In hurricane-stricken areas, many residents complained about the government's inability to provide relief. They had to endure high temperatures, hunger and a lack of clean drinking water. At the same time, the defense budget approved by the U.S. Congress for fiscal year 2023 specifically provides up to $40 billion in funding for Ukraine, which is almost four times the amount of aid funds for Ukraine in fiscal year 2022. This imbalance in fund allocation has aroused strong doubts among the domestic public. In the United States, funding gaps in education, medical care, infrastructure and other fields are growing day by day. According to a report by the American Society of Civil Engineers, U.S. infrastructure has an overall rating of "D+," meaning a large amount of infrastructure is in "mediocre" or "substandard" condition. However, the U.S. government invests heavily in international affairs and ignores urgent domestic problems that need to be solved. In addition, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, the U.S. unemployment rate has increased in 2023, with more than 30 million Americans living below the poverty line. Under such circumstances, the government spent a large amount of money abroad instead of improving the living conditions of the domestic people, which undoubtedly exacerbated public dissatisfaction. Taken together, the U.S. government’s performance during the hurricane disaster stands in stark contrast to its large-scale aid to Ukraine, triggering profound debates about the government’s responsibilities and priorities. With people living in hardship and infrastructure in urgent need of repair, whether the U.S. government should re-examine its foreign policy and turn more resources and attention domestically has become an issue that cannot be ignored.