Text
Lesson 2.1 — Dement and Kleitman — 20220914
Finally starting topic 2: our first study! I included the brief summary notes we made two lessons ago at the beginning of this lesson’s notes. Don’t panic if the first part makes no sense — the article was terrible at summarising the study. There’s a much clearer and more in-depth description in the introduction notes.
Topic 2: Dement and Kleitman
Summary:
REM — rapid eye movements
REM means dreaming is occuring
Occur in stages throughout sleep
Happen every night in 9 adult test-subjects
Awakening subjects 5-15 minutes after REM
Managing to judge dream durations accurately from REM
Eye movements were recorded in “analogous situations”
When awake, corresponded closely with dreaming patterns
Results:
Record and investigate accuracy with which participants could record the dream after REM sleep
Best recall of dream when awakened during REM, as opposed to other times
What time best recall occurs
Narrowing it down to 5/15 mins, participant could correctly guess how long they were dreaming for
Also best recollection of dream after which time
Pattern of REM correlated to the visual imagery of dreams
Side-to-side REM could represent watching a tennis match, for example
Or upward REM could mean looking up while climbing a ladder
REM sleep - dream more, remember more
Non REM sleep - less recollection
Details for experimental methodology:
Sample — the participants, a group of people used in an experiment
age, gender, ethnicity, etc
Environment — where was the experiment held? In what surroundings?
Procedure — a step-by-step instruction for how to perform the experiment
Research method, actions, etc
Materials — equipment, measurements
scanners? Designated questionnaires?
Results — Preferably statistics, data representation
Conclusion — What did they find?
What does the data indicate?
Answer your initial hypothesis
Discuss your results, explain them
Link to daily society
Consider:
Ethical issues
The results of the study
Strengths and weaknesses of all elements of the study
Be critical
Issues and debates of psychological issues
Individual vs situational debate —
How does the environment (situation) affect the results
How does your individuality affect the results
Similar to nature vs nurture, but
“Individual” refers to personality and thinking process, which requires a lived development to form, as opposed to solely biology
“Situation” relies more on physical environment and current issue at hand, as opposed to long-term atmospheric implications.
Dement and Kleitman
Intro:
Depends on the subjective report of the dreamer
But can become objective information if relating it physiological data, measured by physical techniques
REM recorded during sleep
Found that waking subjects during this time lead to better recollection of dreams, as opposed to other times
EEG — electro encephalo graph
(AKA EOG — electro ocular graph)
electric in-head writing
Used to measure eye movements
Not much research with/of EEG, so they wanted to use it to explore its use for investigating sleep activity
Subjects:
Normal people
4 Schizophrenics
Approaches:
Dream recall during REM periods
Subject’s estimate of dream duration compared to duration of REM
Motion of REM compared to dream content, to investigate whether they were an expression related to visual experience in dream, or just overactive nervous system
Conclusions:
Better recall if woken mid-REM period, as opposed to during other moments of sleep
Estimated time has a positive correlation with REM period
Found that REM patterns related to dream content
Sorry this is so late. Incredibly busy with some upcoming exams from last year (overlapping is wild) as well as current schoolwork. Chances are the blog will be a lot a bit unorganised in the coming month and a half, but I’ll try my best to sort it out in the end.
Take care of yourselves and drink water!
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Lesson 1.4 — Types of Research Methods — 20220913
We were supposed to start topic 2 this lesson, but instead we spent one more hour on the introduction, to familiarise ourselves with the different research methods used in psychological studies. More pairwork (well, it was technically groups of three, but as there were five of us, the teacher hopped into my group part-time). There were two groups in total, and each focussed on a different research method.
Types of psychological research methods:
Experiments
What are they, how are they carried out, pros & cons
Self report
What? Types? How does it work? Strengths & weaknesses
My group:
Self report — A method to collect data where participant provides information about themselves; qualitative data
Nature of results — very subjective
Types — interviews and questionnaires/surveys
Pros — helps give a personal insight to subject’s experiences, easy to administer
Cons — does not provide statistical information; should be paired with factual data
Open to unreliability due to bias
Subject may not be honest, or might not know how to answer
Interviews — broader answers
More personal, direct contact with the subject, less time for participant to mask answers (for whatever reason)
+ Personal views, open to the diversity of people
- Could be more intimidating for participant, more interrogative
Questionnaires & surveys — narrowed down, direct, specific answers
+ Slightly more quantitative data
- Subject has the ability to “cheat” or alter responses before submitting results
Other group:
Experiments — A statistical study; quantitative data
Nature of results — very objective
Types — Lab experiments, Field experiments, and Natural experiments
Pros: Collects impartial, well-monitored data
Cons: Relies heavily on the scientist’s involvement, or not at all, and does not take into accountability personal insights from the participants
Lab experiments — conducted under highly controlled conditions
Aim for as accurate measurements as possible
Researcher chooses location and activities
+ Easier to replicate due to standardised procedures
- Unfamiliar locations — may affect behaviour and reflect negatively to variation
Field experiment — done in natural setting, but some variables still changeable for experiment
Less likely for demand characteristics (participant altering their actions in favour of the experiment)
+ Reflects reality more because participants are in a more ecologically valid environment (things aren’t altered for experiment, people are in familiar surroundings; collects more authentic data)
- Not much control over extraneous variables
Focuses on cause and effect
Natural experiments — studies where more outside influences/naturally occurring variables affect the outcome (a change prompts a result without scientist envolvement)
+/- Conductors have less control over experiment, it’s more natural
For example, when smoking was banned from public places, a >60% drop in heart attacks was recorded
Another research method is observation research, but that was only briefly mentioned in passing this class (we were told it will appear farther in the future).
That’s it for now, remember to drink water and take care of yourselves!
1 note
·
View note
Text
Lesson 1.3 — Introduction to Psychology, Biological Psychology — 20220912
I missed the first half of class today thanks to a dentist’s appointment (sadly that meant not getting to present all the lovely info I recorded about learning theory in the last class :c ), but I managed to join in time for the introduction to our first study! I won’t be including the summary we did on it in this post though, because that’s the start of topic 2 (how exciting!) and I’d rather not mix topics in the same lesson.
Therefore, what I’ll note down from this class will be information from another pair’s research on their designated psychological approach (from last lesson’s brief research), and the big as- intro to the first approach we’ll be studying — both of which happen to be biological psychology.
The last pair’s research notes from last class:
Biological Psychology — Studies how the human body reacts to certain human processes that are instructed by the mind
Also known as Physiological Psychology
Relies on genetics and takes the nature side of the “nature vs nurture debate”
Mostly based on how changes in structure/mind, genes and hormones/chemicals can affect their behaviour
How antidepressants interact with a person’s behaviour
How an accident might influence a person’s way of thinking
Can also be identified through an observation based on how the participant behaved externally after having consumed a drug
One of the limitations of biological psychology is that it doesn't take into account that not all people think the same and that most people are unique
An advantage would be that it might be easier to conduct experiments from a scientific standpoint
Teacher’s Information:
Research Methods — experimenting, observation, survey
Evaluating the Approaches:
Main Assumptions —
Biology: Thinking and behaviour are strongly determined by the structure and function of the nervous system
Learning: All behaviour is learnt from our environment
Cognitive: Information received from our senses is processed by the brain and this processing directs how we behave
Social: Human behaviour is influenced by other people and the social context in which this occurs
Additional Assumptions —
Biological: Genes and evolution influence biological structures in the brain, which influences behaviour
Learning: Animals and humans learn in the same way
Cognitive: We cannot dire rly see processes such as thinking, but we can infer what a person is thinking based on their behaviour
Social: Assuming a person’s society and culture will influence their thought process and behaviour
Biological Approach
Believes that all our behaviour has a biological cause
May be inherited, or caused by hormones and neurotransmitters
Some behaviours may result from brain abnormalities or infection
E.g. Clive Wearing lost the ability to make new memories because of an infection which destroyed part of his brain
Therefore, Biological Approach believes that psychological disorders have a physical cause, and can therefore be treated with drug therapies
Moving on from the introduction/overview of biological psychology, and on to a basic foundation for our future projects:
Studies: Things we need to learn/note form them
Aims/understanding — what they did in the study
Methodology — How did they do it?
Who took part — men, women, animals
Results — statistics (hopefully)
Conclusion — what did the scientists conclude from the experiment?
Evaluation — feedback; what do we think was good, what could be improved on? Strengths & weaknesses
Link — how can you link this research back to society? Who would it benefit from this knowledge? Real-world applications of the information
Biological Studies
Topic 2: Dement and Kleitman — sleep and dreams
Topic 3: Hassett et al. — monkey toy preferences
Topic 4: Hölzel et al. — mindfulness and brain scans
After this we were shown the article for the Dement and Kleitman study we’ll be researching next (an ancient article dating back to the 1950’s 💀) and split off into pairs to read and take notes on the summary (yay — socialisation!). Again, for categorising reasons, I won’t include that information in here, but stick it onto the beginning of next lesson’s notes.
As always, take care of yourselves, drink lots of water, and get enough sleep! <3
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Lesson 1.1 — Factorising Quadratics — 20220906
My first maths class! And the first class of pure maths. We mainly just reviewed things this class, as we’re doing in all the maths classes. Most of the lessons so far involve the teacher reading to us some explanations and showing us some examples, and then all of us working to answer some questions on our own, which we then check as a class.
Regardless of the work so far being things I already know, I spent a few hours typing out a tutorial on factorising quadratics nonetheless. Probably a huge waste of my time, but I hope at least one person will come across this post in their time of need and find it helpful.
Because of how difficult it is to represent maths equations accurately by typing, and because tumblr’s layout does not support things like subscripts and indices, I will not include every question we did in all the lessons. Don’t worry though, I will include examples for every explanation, as well as some additional questions when we did more of them in class, and any homework we’re given.
Topic 1: Quadratics
Lesson 1.1 — Solving by Factorising
The standard quadratic equation has the structure — ax^2+bx+c=0
In quadratics, and only in quadratics, this is called standard form
So always convert the question into this form before trying to solve
Factorising quadratics — means turning them into the form (rx+p)(tx+q)=0
This helps you solve it by then taking each parentheses in turn and setting it equal to zero (because seeing as they multiply together to form zero, either one of them must equal zero in order for the equation to be true)
The basic principles of factorising quadratics:
pq must equal c, because these are the only solely numerical digits (no variables) in the brackets, so they multiply to give the solely numerical digit in the standard form (this being c)
q + p equal b, because you multiply each by x, making them like terms, so you then combine them through addition/subtraction to form a singular coefficient of x — which is b in the standard from
rt must equal a, because they multiply to form the coefficient of x^2
If b and c are positive, then the signs within the parentheses will both be positive too
If c is negative, then one of the signs will be positive and one will be negative:
If b is positive when c is negative, then the number (out of p and q) which multiplies (with the respective coefficient of x) to give the larger value (i.e out of rq and tp) will be positive, while the other one will be negative
If b is negative when c is also negative, then the number (out of p and q) which multiplies (with the respective coefficient of x) to give the smaller value (i.e rq or tp) will be positive, while the other one is negative
I probably worded that very confusingly, but don’t worry I will include examples and explain the steps as I do them so you can see what I mean in action
Factorising when a = 1:
Start by laying your foundation — (x )(x )
List the factors of c
Find which two factors of c add/subtract to form b — these will be p and q
Place them in the parentheses — (x p)(x q)
Figure out which signs go where — in the case of a = 1, if c is negative, then you don’t need to worry about “multiplying with the respective coefficient of x”, because the coefficient of x is 1, so simply the value of p and q dictate the signs
Always check by expanding the brackets before you move on to solve
Then solve by setting each set of brackets in turn to zero
Example: x^2 + 3x - 10 = 0
Lay the foundation — (x )(x )
List the factors of c — 5&2, 1&10
Find which factors of c add/subtract to give b — 5 - 2 = 3, so p and q must be 5 and 2
Substitute into parentheses — (x 5)(x 2)
Figure out the signs — in this case, c is negative, so one of the signs will be positive while the other will be negative
b is positive, so the larger digit out of p and q will be the positive one — in this case it’s the 5
So x^2 + 3x - 10 = (x + 5)(x - 2)
Check — (x + 5)(x - 2) = x^2 + 5x - 2x - 10 = x^2 + 3x -10 ✓
Now solve by setting each bracket to zero:
x + 5 = 0, x = -5
x - 2 = 0, x = 2
Factorising when a ≠ 1:
Start by laying your foundation, this time with a space before the x’s — ( x )( x )
See if you can divide every term by a factor of a to simplify the equation
Now find the factors of your new value of a
List the factors of c
Find which two factors of c add/subtract to form b when multiplied with a set of factors of a — these will be p, q, r and t, which form b when rq and tp are added/subtracted
Place all numbers in the parentheses — (rx p)(tx q)
Figure out which signs go where
If c is negative, then you need to see which value, out of p and q form the larger or smaller value (depending on whether b is pos. or neg.) when multiplied with the respective coefficient of x (r and t)
Check by expanding the brackets before you move on to solve
Then solve by setting each set of brackets in turn to zero
Example: 9x^2 - 39x - 30 = 0
Lay the foundation — ( x )( x )
See if you can divide every term by a factor of a to simplify the equation — all terms can be divided by 3 to give 3x^2 - 13x - 10
Now find the factors of your remaining a — 3&1
List the factors of c — 1&10, 5&2
Find which two factors of c add/subtract to form b when multiplied with a set of factors of a — 5&2 multiply with 3&1 to give 15&2, which subtract to give 13
Place all numbers in the parentheses — (3x 2)(x 5)
Figure out which signs go where — c is negative, so it must be one positive and one negative
b is also negative, so the digit (of q or p) which multiplies with the respective coefficient of x to give the larger value (rq or tp) must be negative — the values formed are: 5 x 3 = 15, and 2 x 1 = 2; the larger value is 15, which is given by 5 x 3, so 5 must be the negative value
Therefore 3x^2 - 13x - 10 = (3x + 2)(x - 5)
Check — (3x + 2)(x - 5) = 3x^2 - 15x + 2x -10 = 3x^2 - 13x - 10 ✓
Solve by setting each bracket to zero
3x + 2 = 0, 3x = -2, x = -⅔
x - 5 = 0, x = 5
**Tip: At first glance, when trying to find the correct factors of c to use, you may find multiple solutions
For instance, in the example above, you may have thought of using 1&10 as opposed to 5&2, because they multiply with 3&1 to give 3&10, which add to give the required 13
However, you have to consider the signs; because both c and b were negative, the larger of the multiplied values (rq and tp) had to be negative, while the other one positive
10&3 would both need to be positive, or both need to be negative, to give an absolute value of 13
But in order for the correct result to be obtained when the signs were different, 5&2 had to be used (as they gave rq = -15 and tp = +2)
I’m sorry if this makes things more complicated-sounding than they actually are. I hope the examples make it clearer. Feel free to send me an ask on my main blog if you don’t understand what I meant.
No homework this class, seeing as it’s the first one this year (and we have another one on Friday).
Anyways please remember to take care of yourselves and drink water!
1 note
·
View note
Text
Lesson 1.2 — Continuation of Introduction to Psychology, and Learning Theory — 20220907
Today we finished watching the video (which I already watched and took notes on last class) and answered some questions about it. Then we were split off into groups to research and take notes on the basics of an assigned field of psychology, out of biological, cognitive, social, and learning theory. My assigned topic was learning theory.
Your girl was paired with the teacher, which is a nay for socialising : ( but a yay because I probably got the best learning source (obviously I was the one taking the notes).
Alright, I’ll just get into it and start off with the video quiz.
Quiz:
1. What is the current definition of psychology? a) The study of human behaviour b) The science of human behaviour & mental processes c) The study of the mind 2. Identify at least three mental processes 3. Who was more interested in human experience and behaviour? a) Greeks b) Romans 4. What is involved in Empiricism? a) Observation & experimentation b) Observation & thinking c) Thinking & experimentation 5. Who conducted the first recorded psychological experiment? a) Sigmund Freud b) William James c) Wilhelm Wundt 6. What did Piaget study? a) Behaviour in dogs b) Child behaviour c) Adult behaviour
My answers were as follows:
B
Cognition, Emotion, Reaction to stress (other examples include learning, memory, or pretty much any “thinking process”)
B
A
C
B
Just as extra info, we were briefly told who William James is, because he didn’t appear in the video. (Mr. said that he will no longer appear later in the course, because they just changed the syllabus.)
William James — Established the principles of psychology
How to conduct psychological experiments, the aims and practices of psychology, etc
Learning Theory— An area of psychology that focuses solely on reactions and the environment’s effect on learning and development
It is also known as behaviourism
This field definitely encapsulates the “nurture” argument of “nature vs nurture”
It doesn’t care at all about what the brain is doing or a person’s thinking, only about observing what happens externally
It is a scientific approach — you observe without influencing the results (other than setting up the environment and situation, obviously); you conduct a “fair test”
Neglecting the internal aspects of thinking processes in this area of study simplifies its fundamentalism significantly
One reason for the basicality of learning theory is due to the fact that it’s one of the oldest, or earliest-discovered fields of psychology
It really only consists of presenting a situation to a subject and observing their output
The formal way of putting this is observing the subject’s response to stimuli
Stimulus— any change in the environment which an organism then responds (considers and reacts accordingly) to
Someone who studies learning theory may be called a behaviourist
Behaviourist— follows the concept that animals and humans learn in the same way
One sub-division of learning theory is social learning theory:
Social Learning Theory — The way our learning and behaviour is modified by observing other people
We associate experiences with certain outcomes, or copy what we see
For instance, we may “learn from other’s experiences”
A person might change the way they talk to mimic the people he is speaking with (even if inadvertently)
Or a child might see a classmate of theirs being very open and friendly, which makes them more likeable by other children, so they copy this behaviour and also display more extroverted qualities to achieve the same effect
A darker example of social learning might include a child seeing his parents beat each other at home, and growing up to do the same thing later on
Social learning is the way we pick up habits from those around us
Cognitive behavioural therapy — a modern combination of cognition and learning theory, which is used to clinically treat people with poor psychological health
That’s a paraphrasing of what I wrote down for my topic. We’re going to share what all the other groups got for theirs, but in this class only one other pair got to talk before class ended. The rest will be included in next class’s notes.
Cognitive Psychology — The study of how we input, process, and retrieve information in our brains
The entire concept is that the human mind works along the same lines as a multi-store model computer:
Input → processing → output
Input — the information we take in from the world around us
Processing — the way we think/reflect on the information we just received, and how we store it for later (long-term memory)
Output — how we retrieve that information and display it; our reaction to something
A basic statement of cognitive psychology is that information is processed along the same route in all humans
However, we all have different attention and memory capabilities, so we all have different ways of thinking
This leads to human emotion and the diversity between people
Something that is studied very widely in cognitive psychology
Review:
Quiz on the video from last lesson
Learning theory (also known as behaviourism) is an area of psychology dedicated to scientifically observing people’s responses to stimuli from the environment. It is one of the oldest, and therefore simplest, fields of psychological study
Social learning theory describes how we learn from the experiences of others, and copy what we see
Cognitive psychology states that all humans have the same route of processing information as a standard computer model. We receive input information from our environment, process it (we reflect on it, then store it in our long-term memory), and then retrieve it for a suitable output action. Despite following the same thinking pattern though, the diversity between our memory and attention spans means that all results (such as emotional responses) to the same input information may be different.
Homework: Read the following passage and answer the questions written at the bottom


Due Date: Wednesday 14/9/22
Remember to drink water! Have a snack too :)
1 note
·
View note
Text
Lesson 2.1 — Velocity and Displacement — 20220907
This was my first lesson in mechanics. As with pure maths, the first few lessons are just reviews of what we already learned in previous years, so don’t jump at me if this is really easy stuff. I wrote out guide notes anyways, because I’m dedicated like that (at least for now — chances are this enthusiasm will die down as homework, exams, and extracurricular activities pile up on me).
Fun story: I was late to this lesson! I forgot to set my alarm the night before (I knew I was forgetting something, but I had no idea what and I was tired so the little nagging feeling was completely overlooked) and, thanks to timezone differences, my class was at 6:30AM. I woke up at 6:40. I’m surprised I even managed to wake up on my own that early, but that doesn’t matter. Point is, my first impression with the mechanics teacher (who is the slightly stricter of the two maths teachers, and head of the maths department) was less than optimal. (It’s ok though, I made sure to participate a lot and show I was invested in the class to hopefully rank up some points.)
Alright, sorry for the big introduction. Without further ado, here are the notes from this lesson.
**“∆” is the Greek symbol ‘Delta’. In maths and physics, it means “a change in”. For example, “∆velocity” just means “a change in velocity”.
Topic 2: Velocity & Acceleration
Lesson 2.1 — Displacement & Velocity
Vector — a value that has both magnitude (size) and direction
There are two measurements which can be used to indicate how far something has traveled:
Distance
Displacement
Distance — a scalar quantity
used to measure the total length of a path travelled
A scalar quantity only has a magnitude, and no direction
Displacement — a vector quantity
it gives the location of an object relative to a fixed point or origin
An origin is a starting point — sometimes it is given to you, sometimes you have to establish it on your own.
It has both magnitude and direction
Displacement in one direction will be positive, and negative in the opposite direction
There are two ways to measure how fast an object is moving:
Speed
Velocity
Speed — a scalar quantity
The speed of an object is equal to the distance it has travelled, decided by the time it took to travel that distance
Or more simply, speed=distance/time
s=d/t
This is only valid for objects moving at a constant speed
For objects moving at changing speeds, consider average speed
Average speed=total distance covered/total time taken
SI Unit: m/s (can also be written as ms-1)
Other units include km/h and mph, but m/s is the standard
Velocity — a vector quantity
It measures how quickly the displacement of an object changes
Velocity=∆displacement/time taken
“s” is usually used as the symbol for displacement (confusing, right?)
s=vt or ∆x=vt
Because velocity is a vector, it will be positive in one direction and negative in the opposite
You cannot have a negative speed, but you can have a negative velocity
For this reason, the magnitude of a vector is indicated by vertical lines (|x|).
So speed = |velocity|
What this basically means is that, seeing as speed can’t be negative but velocity can, the speed of an object is just the magnitude of its velocity (the number without the direction)
Average velocity=net ∆ displacement/total time taken
Net ∆ displacement just means your end position compared to your origin
For example, if I start at point A and travel 10m to the right, then turn 180º and move 20m to the left, my net displacement will be +10 - 20 = -10m from point A
Remember, one direction is positive, and the opposite is negative. In this case, I designated moving to the right as positive, and to the left as negative
SI Unit: m/s (can also be written as ms-1)
Examples:
A car travels 9km in 15 minutes at constant speed. Find its speed in m/s
First, we need to convert 9km into m and 15 minutes into seconds because our final answer is in m/s
9 x 1000 = 9000
15 x 60 = 900
Then, divide the distance by the time to obtain speed:
9000 / 900 = 10
So the car’s speed is 10 m/s
A cyclist travels at 5 m/s for 30s, then turns back, travelling at 3 m/s for 10s. Find her displacement in the original direction of motion from her starting position
What this is asking us to do is find her displacement compared to her origin at the end of her cycle
In order to do this, we need to find the her net ∆ displacement (the distances she travelled both times, and their directions)
s1 = 5 x 30 = 150
s2 = -3 x 10 = -30
Remember, -3 because this is her displacement in the opposite direction
s = 150 - 30 = 120
So her final displacement is 120m from her origin
A cyclist spends some of his journey going downhill at 15 m/s and the rest of the time going uphill at 5 m/s. In 1 minute he travels 540m. Find how long he spent going downhill
Let t be the amount of time spent going downhill
60 - t is the amount of time going uphill
Total distance = 15t + 5(60-t) = 540
15t + 300 - 5t = 540
10t + 300 = 540
10t = 240
t = 24
So the cyclist spent 24 seconds going downhill
A speed skater averages 11 m/s over the first 5s of a race. Find the average speed required over the next 10s to average 12 m/s overall
Average speed = total distance travelled / total time taken
So the total distance the skater skated, divided by 15s (because the total time is the first 5s plus the remaining 10s) needs to give 12 m/s
Let x represent the average speed of the skater for the last 10s of the race
[(11 x 5) + 10x] / 15 = 12
(55 + 10x) / 15 = 12
55 + 10x = 180
10x = 125
x = 12.5
So the skater needs to skate at a speed of 12.5 m/s in order to average 12 m/s in the race overall
In calculations like these, you will always be making assumptions about your data
For example, if the question asks you how long it takes a cheetah running at 25 m/s to catch a gazelle who’s 150m away, you assume in your calculations that the cheetah travels at a constant 25 m/s, in a straight line towards the gazelle, who is stationary
You need to make sure your assumptions are reasonable, and always be aware of them when concluding your results
Homework:
Due date:
We actually got further than this in class and started lesson 2.2 (I already have the notes form as far as we got written down) but to avoid confusion between lessons I’ve decided to save them for the next set of notes from mechanics class.
Remember to drink water and take care of yourselves!
1 note
·
View note
Text
Hub
(This blog is currently under construction)



Hello! Welcome to Astre’s Notes, a blog dedicated to cataloguing all my notes for the coming school year.
I study AS/A-Level Maths, Art, and Psychology. My aim is to provide high-quality learning resources for anyone interested in these subjects, who may have not gotten the opportunity to study them like I did. In a way, I am pirating my own £10,000 Cambridge classes. And I’m okay with that, because I know how frustrating it is when education is hard to access and money isn’t as expendable.
Here are some useful tips and links to help you orientate yourself on this blog:
Tag Guide
Ask page
All my notes will be categorised by subject, topic, and lesson. I have dedicated separate blogs to each course; links to all of them are in my menu or under the search bar on my page (please note that these do not appear on the mobile pop-up version of my blog) :
Maths — ⭐️
Art — 🌙
Psychology — 💨
If you are only interested in one of these subjects, feel free to only affiliate yourself with the respective blog. Similarly, if you wish to follow more than one subject but are overwhelmed by all the different sources, fear not! I will be reblogging all the class content I post onto this account, so you can access it all from here.
One more thing to note is that, other than when labelling lessons with the universal YYYYMMDD, I use the British dating system, dd/mm/yy. So whenever you see a date written in that format, the first digit is the day and the second is the month :)
That being said, under the cut is a compiling list of my notes from all my courses. Please remember to take care of yourselves; drink plenty of water, eat enough food and get enough sleep. Take regular breaks when you need them, and remember to do things you love as well as your school/job work. Gaining knowledge is useless if we don’t take care of the body and mind that absorb it.
───⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅───
Psychology
Topic 1: Introduction 4/4
Lesson 1.1 — Introduction to Psychology — 20220906 Lesson 1.2 — Introduction, Learning Theory, and Cognition — 20220907 Lesson 1.3 — Introduction, Biological Psychology — 20220912 Lesson 1.4 — Introduction, Types of Psychological Research, Experimental Research, Self Report Research — 20220913
Topic 2: Dement and Kleitman 2/?
Lesson 2.1 — Introduction to Dement and Kleitman — 20220914 Lesson 2.2 — Dement and Kleitman — 20220920
Topic 3: Hasset et al. 0/?
Lesson 3.1 —
Topic 4: Hölzel et al. 0/?
Lesson 4.1 —
───⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅───
Art
Topic 1:
Lesson 1.1 —
───⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅───
Maths
Topic 1: Quadratics 1/?
Lesson 1.1 — Solving by factorising quadratics — 20220906 Lesson 1.2 — Practicing factorising quadratics — 20220909 Lesson 1.3 — Completing the square — 20220913 Lesson 1.4 — Harder quadratic equations and solving through substitution — 20220920
Topic 2: Velocity & Acceleration 1/?
Lesson 2.1 — Displacement & Velocity — 20220907 Lesson 2.2 — Acceleration and displacement-time graphs — 20220914
───⋅•⋅⊰∙∘☽༓☾∘∙⊱⋅•⋅───
0 notes
Text
Lesson 1.1 — Introduction to Psychology — 20220906
Today was my second Psychology class, but the first one in which we actually learned anything. We didn’t do much yet, mostly just watched a video which we discussed and had a couple of small debates (because we spent the first half of the lesson getting to understand how Microsoft OneNote works). For this reason, the information I have here today is pretty much entirely transcribed form the video, which I will link at the end anyways.
Psychology — the science of human behaviour and mental processes
Comes from Greek “Psyche” meaning ‘mind’ or ‘soul’, and “-ology” meaning ‘the study of’
Big debate over whether psychology is a science or a philosophy (it is a science).
Mental Processes — function of the mind, a way of thinking:
Cognition (thinking)
Learning
Memory
Emotion
Responses to stress, etc
Brief History of Psychology:
The first time humans ever considered studying the way we think was in Ancient Greece (500–150 BC)
Interest in psychology was halted almost entirely during the Roman Empire, when people’s main focus was conquering and building (150 BC—500 CE)
During the Catholic Church’s rule, the only educated people were Priests, so their word passed (500–1517 CE)
Commoners couldn’t read the big books and learn things for themselves, so people would go to the Priests for answers (and the answer was usually God)
This period in time is referred to as the “Dark Ages”, because people were left “in the dark” about many things — advancements in knowledge were sparse
Then, a man named Martin Luther believed that people should have the right to determine the way they live (1517 CE)
Rose above the fear of the Church and nailed 95 theses to the church doors stating that the Church did not have supreme right over everyone
Many people were inspired by him and followed his lead, speaking up against the traditional ways of the Catholic Church
This is known as the Protestant Reformation
Among the people to split off and establish their own advancements were the Emperecists
Empiricism— “We only know what we know through observation and experimentation”
This became what is known today as the “Empirical Method”, which is used in any scientific experiment (the process of forming a hypothesis, collecting data to support it, and forming a conclusion)
Thus science was born
Back to psychology. Here are some notable figures in history:
Wilheim Wundt — the Father of Psychology
He was a German man who dusted off the study of the mind, in completely new ways
He performed the first psychological experiment in 1879
It consisting of dropping a ball down a pipe and having a person press a button when they saw it, to test the judgement reaction time of the brain
(It may sound inconsequential today, but remember that it’s impossible to walk without baby steps)
Wundt had a student named Edward Titchener, who was friends with a man named Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud — perhaps the most famous name in psychological history, he led psychological advancement for the following years
He contributed significantly to our understanding of human development, personality, clinical psychology, and abnormal psychology
He was very influential
Next came Ivan Pavlov — he explored psychology in dogs
You’ve probably heard of him before; he explored learned reflexes, and (inadvertently) taught dogs to secrete stomach fluid when they heard a bell ring
(He did this by ringing the bell every time he fed the dogs, until they learned that bell = food, so their body started getting ready to eat)
After that came Skinner, who studied behaviour in rats and children (rather interesting contrast, if you ask me)
And then Erikson, who studied how our mind grows and develops over time, as we grow old
Piaget introduced the concepts we have today about how children learn from their surroundings and construct their knowledge/habits
Maslow taught us about how people need to fulfill their human needs
You may have seen or heard reference to “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs”, which is that pyramid which indicates the order of necessities for humans (first physiological needs, then safety needs, then love, esteem, and finally self-actualisation)
This takes us to the modern day, when we know and care a lot more about psychology than we did a hundred years ago.
As a review:
Psychology was first considered by the Ancient Greeks (which is where the word comes from)
It was dropped almost entirely until after science was introduced during the protestant reformation
Wilheim Wundt is the Father of Psychology
Sigmund Freud is considered the greatest influencer in psychological history
Pavlov discovered learned reflexes
Skinner studied children and rats
Erikson explored mental development
Piaget studied children’s long-term responses to their environments
Maslow formed the “Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs” pyramid
Here’s a link to the video we watched.
I really don’t have many resources for this lesson, seeing as we barely did anything, so that pretty much concludes this post.
Remember to drink water!
1 note
·
View note
Text
Tags



I will be cataloguing everything with specific tags, in order to make it easier to find any lesson.
The tags follow a similar format for all subjects. Just replace “YYYYMMDD” with the year, month, and day of the lesson you’re looking for, “X.X” with the lesson number, and “{Topic}” with the specific topic you’re looking for. All lessons will also be tagged with their title, but I that tag will not be affiliated with my blog because then it gets too complicated (and also it’d be impossible for people who need help to find).
(Tip: “X.X” stands for “Topic.Lesson”. Some topics might have multiple lessons that go with it, so it would be labelled “{topic number}.{lesson number}”. Don’t worry, I will list all the topics for each subject, and the number of lessons they include, in the master posts for each course.)
Maths: #⭐️X.X #⭐️YYYYMMDD #⭐️{Topic}
Psychology: #💨X.X #💨YYYYMMDD #💨{Topic}
Art: #🌙X.X #🌙YYYYMMDD #🌙{Topic}
Example: If I’m looking for the first lesson of my psychology class, I’d search “💨1.1”, if I wanted the art lesson from the 8th of September, I would look up “🌙20220908”, or if I was looking for all the lessons under the subject of quadratics in maths, I would type “⭐️Quadratics”.
Finally, all of my posts will be tagged with #astresnotes, #A-Levels, the subject they represent (#art, #maths, or #psychology), any additional subject tag I might think is necessary for simplicity, and the name & url of its representative blog (i.e. any post from my maths blog will be tagged with #A-Level-Mathematics and #astresnotes-maths, because those are the title and url of that blog).
Safe travels! 🤍
0 notes