at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

helloooo have you ever drawn le bas and saint just en mission??

reread missions to alsace for this one

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

i feel weirdly comfortable with my evil, ill-intentioned friend

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Hello, could you give me your position on the right of trans people?

Hi, thanks for the question, anon. I believe everyone deserves their human rights to be respected and for those rights to be upheld.

The entire idea of a separate "trans rights" movement confuses me because it's framed as a civil rights movement, and yet it's not. No one owes you free plastic surgery or validating your fake identity; that is not a civil right. There's also so much talk about "trans rights are human rights" (slogan likely stolen from feminists), but what human rights are denied specifically to trans people? Every single activist has failed to provide an answer to this.

If you want a specific answer, you'd have to specify what those "trans rights" include.

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

silly idea i had

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Wow, a person who claims to be ready to "indulge [their opponent] in a normal debate" (see main reply chain), yet refuses to give examples and clear explanations when directly asked to, calls their opponent names and belittles them, and makes up their own logic (again see main reply chain)... Not surprising for someone whose whole blog revolves around hating and harassing all who do not 'conform' to their narrowminded ideas about the range of identities humans fit in, one could say.

When someone linked this whole reply chain to me, I was expecting some travesty of a debate, but this so much worse than I thought it would be.

I hope you're grow out of whatever hateful ideologies you hold before they become your only legacy.

The person that you talked to recently in reblogs (the womyn defending men and whining about “equality”) is a Neo-Confederate.

She literally called the vice president of the Confederacy (Alexander Hamilton Stephens) “cute”.

She’s also friends with someone (that Chanel blog) who called Jefferson Davis (the Confederate president) “hot”.

She’s obviously trying to squeeze her way into our spaces in order to make her Pro-Secession mindset more “acceptable”.

She disgusts me as a POC womyn myself, who has enslaved ancestors.

(The person I’m talking about is Officialfrevblrpage24, if any other radfems wanted to be aware)

That makes more sense. You confused me a bit with the "neo-confederate" accusation, thanks for the context. I don't know if calling someone hot would equal supporting the actions of the person, though. Doesn't Hamilton have a whole fanbase, kinda like Napoleon?

EDIT: Nevermind, I saw the rest. That is a neo-confederate.

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

antoine really is THE GUY when it comes to being the perfect pick to generate situational jealousy in all of lestat's main pairings because not only can you easily compare him to nicolas because he's also a musician, you can (and must!) use him on loustat fics due him being dollar tree louis in appearance but you can ALSO use him on lesmand fics because antoine is very explicitly said to have been turned at 18 while arriving at NOLA at 17 which means you can totally rope armand jealousy by saying lestat was only trying to find a pretty twink replacement for him like antoine really is THE middle of the venn diagram of many lestat pairings while also being a poor replacement for ALL THREE CHARACTERS meaning he is never going to be a real threat to your preferred pairing like!!! truly antoine is the BEST narrative device you can have for any and all lestat fics

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Support me in this I beg of u

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Hey frev people, I'm not dead anymore. Lol. I am hoping to keep doing frev stuff, not that my life isn't as chaotic. I have been doing some frev research projects. (And also tried my hand at writing fan fics lol) But I've missed being more active in the fandom. 🎉

Ohh also. I have a cat!

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Saint Just for my school art assignment

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

I tried making a comic based on that one letter Couthon wrote to Saint Just while he was away (thank you again to the people who answered my ask when i wasnt able to find it). Focusing on the fact that Couthon was, at the time of writing it, acknowleding that hes never going to be able to walk again. And that he was (and still kind of is) being forgotten, ignored and overshadowed by SJ and Robespierre.

Im probably not going to finish it because i didnt like the way it was turning out (im more of a "full one piece" person and dont have much experince with comics), but i spent too much time on it so im just going to post it anyway. Coincidentally on the first day of pride month lol

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Saint Just's speech of November 13 analyzed in a few words by the famous lawyer Jacques Vergès

Jacques Vergès ( 1925-2013)

In a YouTube video, the famous lawyer Jacques Vergès is interviewed on an Algerian TV show. Vergès is well-known in Algeria because he was the lawyer for many members of the FLN (National Liberation Front) and, above all, fervently supported the cause of the Algerian revolutionaries. He not only defended them but also married one of the most famous Algerian revolutionaries, Djamila Bouhired. At the time, defending FLN members during the Algerian War was a huge risk. Lawyers could be assassinated by extremists, like Pierre Popie, who was killed by the OAS (Secret Army Organization), or Maître Ould Aoudia, who was allegedly assassinated by the French secret services, as claimed by Raymond Muelle (this is also mentioned in the video, among other things).

Where it becomes especially interesting for those of us passionate about the French Revolution (or experts, considering some Tumblr users ^^) is when, at one point in the video, Jacques Vergès is shown two images: one of Saint-Just and another of Louis XVI (specifically at 1:28:12). Vergès explains that Saint-Just’s speech to the Convention on November 13, 1792, is, in his view, an "indictment of rupture" (this holds significant meaning for Vergès, who excelled in defenses of rupture, having achieved the remarkable feat of never having a client executed, particularly in the highly rigged trials of colonial justice during the Algerian Revolution). This is rare, as prosecutors (or at least those leading the accusation at the time) typically invoked the law. Vergès then elaborates (I’ll quote him directly from here on): "In the king's trial, some argue that it was impossible to try Louis XVI because the monarch had immunity tied to his functions, while others argue that the moment Louis XVI betrayed that immunity, it no longer applied."

Vergès concludes by referencing Saint-Just’s speech: "One day, people will be astonished that in the 18th century, we were less advanced than in Caesar's time—there, the tyrant was slain in the Senate itself, with no other formality than twenty-three dagger blows, and no other law than Rome's freedom."

The video continues a bit further on the topic of Saint-Just. Vergès finishes by saying that Saint-Just serves as a fantastic example for youth, ending with the revolutionary’s quote: "I despise this dust that makes me up and that speaks to you; they may persecute it and kill this dust! But I defy anyone to take from me this independent life I have created for myself in the ages and in the heavens."

What truly intrigued me was the legal perspective of Vergès, a specialist in defenses of rupture, on Saint-Just’s speech—particularly the concept of the "indictment of rupture."

Here is the link to the video (but it is in French and there are no subtitles) as a reminder the part that interests us, that is to say the evocation of Saint-Just, is at 1:28:12

Here is the link to the video (but it's in French and there are no subtitles). Just as a reminder, the part that interests us—the mention of Saint-Just—is at 1:28:12: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZsK9975YoA&ab_channel=allkhadra.

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Death of Marat (1793)

𝓐𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽: 𝓙𝓪𝓬𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼-𝓛𝓸𝓾𝓲𝓼 𝓓𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓭

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

@icybloodtigrss for your unwavering attention and small comments as he practices his speech

archangel of terror

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Incorruptible Chap 4 pt 3

Robespierre is spiralling 💔

I made a little ramble below about meltdowns/autism/etc feel free to read or not read~

So how to put this- I'm using a combination of observations from different events of how Robespierre reacted in stressful situations to inform this scene... But I want to approach with a sensitivity that Robespierre wasn't given by most friends n collegues.

Imo, since I'm writing this story deliberately through a 'what if autism' angle, my opinion is currently 'he sometimes got overwhelmed and spiralled into meltdowns' What is it Pétion calls it? Something like 'getting carried away by his darkest imaginations' I dont have the source right to hand lol

Ppl reacted strongly to this behaviour, often percieving him to be a 'coward', getting weirded out by it, in the case of people like Roland or Petion, using it against him in later arguments as to why his opinions and leadership shouldnt be respected.

For me, having been in situations of being misjudged over meltdowns (that are difficult to control, and in a strange way quite 'seperate' to my overall character), what I see when I read these accounts from others is the opposite of a coward. I see someone who persists through these moments -that on at least one occasion are affecting him so much he is physcally shaking- he persists anyway, and is very brave to keep going (and maybe much too headstrong) in spite of his moments of spiralling, and struggling to deal with situations other people are generally tackling calmly.

Anyway I plan to explore this as we move through the story. But first I want to address how others are percieving these moments of panic, and I hope its perceived that *my stance* is neutral and empathic. Sorry for the long ramble. Meltdowns are a strange, sensitive topic anyway, and its maybe extra sensitive to apply this concept to someone who was real, who we can't ever know everything about for sure. I always hope you enjoy my interpretation!

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Robs and Antoine Léaument :3

[at-times-i-get-a-little-cruel]

Can we as a culture just take a moment to recognize how fucked up it is Trump and Van are going to see Les Miserables, a musical all about how we deny justice to and abuse people society has rejected (such as the poor, the incarcerated, single mothers, students, etc.) and the tragically failed uprising that wanted to help people which was brutally put down while they’re calling the national guard and military in to silence people protesting against mass deportation?!?!?!?