atomicstarstruck

[atomicstarstruck]

Paramount Pictures really took the most homoerotic photos in 1927 after letting these two share an on-screen kiss, then proceeded to sell this film as a war buddy pic.

Amazing.

[atomicstarstruck]

war is stupid i think all those army guys should just fuck each other in uniform

[atomicstarstruck]

I AM SCREECHING AMAZON PRIME/PARAMOUNT+ KEEPS FLASHING THIS SPLIT SECOND CLIP OF A PEPPERONI PIZZA FROM LITTLE CAESAR'S IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS SCENE 😆😭🤣💀

[atomicstarstruck]

some_sewing_nerd

[atomicstarstruck]

VIDEO GAME UNION ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ VIDEO GAME UNION ‼️‼️‼️

UNION ‼️‼️ UNION ‼️‼️‼️ UNION ‼️‼️‼️‼️

UNION ‼️‼️ UNION ‼️‼️‼️ UNION ‼️‼️‼️‼️ THIS SHIT GOES SO HARD!!!!! AWOOOOOOOOOOOO 🐺🐺🐺🐺

[atomicstarstruck]

via

[atomicstarstruck]

courage the cowardly dog episode premise

when i was a kid i lost my retainer while swimming in the ocean because i saw a stingray and screamed too hard and it popped right out my mouth and i used to go to sleep at night imagining that it had landed in the mouth of a dolphin who now had beautiful straight human teeth

[atomicstarstruck]

This week, over 350 rabbis from the USA, together with some American Jewish creatives and activists, took a full-page ad in the New York Times to oppose Trump's plan for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza.

Sources: website of this campaign (Jewish People Say No To Ethnic Cleansing), Jewish Voice For Peace, The Guardian.

[atomicstarstruck]

MANIFESTING

[atomicstarstruck]

There’s a scientific journal called “Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List”.

In 2005, computer scientists David Mazières and Eddie Kohler created this highly profane ten-page paper as a joke, to send in replying to unwanted conference invitations. It literally just contains that seven-word phrase over and over, along with a nice flow chart and scatter-plot graph.

An Australian computer scientist named Peter Vamplew sent it to the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology in response to spam from the journal. Apparently, he thought the editors might simply open and read it.

Instead, they automatically accepted the paper — with an anonymous reviewer rating it as “excellent” — and requested a fee of $150. While this incident is pretty hilarious, it’s a sign of a bigger problem in science publishing. This journal is one of many online-only, for-profit operations that take advantage of inexperienced researchers under pressure to publish their work in any outlet that seems superficially legitimate.

[atomicstarstruck]

[atomicstarstruck]

[atomicstarstruck]

[atomicstarstruck]

I just found the funniest font ever

Like. What is this. Why is this. Who is the target audience of this?

[atomicstarstruck]

i must not kill myself . killing myself is the myself killer

[atomicstarstruck]

I HATE LATEX SO MUCH UAHHHGH THIS WAS FRUSTRATING?!!

BUT but but it's billford so

SMALL TW FOR CIGARETTES AND CIGARETTE BURN MARKS!

Image inspo under the cut

[atomicstarstruck]

Former living weapon absolutely dominating at laser tag