back-to-junko

[back-to-junko]

A 14 year old girl flushing her miscarriage down the toilet can be charged with mutilating a corpse, but keeping a dead woman on life support for 120 days then cutting her open to extract a 2 pound fetus because her dead body was decaying too fast to sustain the pregnancy any longer is not only legal but compelled by law. America/the world/men hate women so much.

[back-to-junko]

[back-to-junko]

TIM: I'm scared, I hope it's okay for a trans woman to be here! If not I'll leave! 😇

If he is saying this shit, bottom line is he's getting off on entering a woman's space...Just my opinion.

[back-to-junko]

you’re delusional if you think there are any ethical ways for a woman to be sold like an object.

[back-to-junko]

I have beef with this experiment and I'd like to explain why.

Under cut cause I got carried away sorry

First of all, our knowledge on rodent behavior has advanced since the experiments took place. The conditions in which mice and rats were kept were not "utopia" in any shape or form.

I'll go over the mouse utopia first (the most famous one, nr. 25): male mice estabilish dominance by fighting. The losing male usually runs away after the fight. But in the mouse "utopia", the losing males had nowhere to run to, they gathered in the center of the pen. And obviously those males would continue fighting among each other, causing more injuries. The dominant males also had it rough - they had harems of females, but because of low mortality due to lack of predators they had to face countless challengers to defend their females. No wonder they ended up exhausted, eventually giving up on mating and defending their harems. The females and their pups ended up being invaded by males, and since most males were already on edge from overpopulation and lack of space, it's not surprising pups were often killed. Mothers would also abadon or kick out their pups from stress, and those would end up not developing proper social behaviors and being more violent and maladjusted than their parents. Calhoun also observed some males choosing to groom themselves all the time, and as far as I'm aware, excessive grooming can be a sign of stress. So TLDR: those mice were in shitty conditions and understandably lashed out. Hardly a proof of anything.

Second thing, the rats. This utopia experiment is lesser known and admittedly I couldn't find as much information on it as on the other one. But here's some food for thought: rats and mice both react strongly to male researchers, the stress they feel compares to being restrained in a tube for 15 minutes. This puts a lot of behavioral experiment results into question. And since the experiment you mention happend so long ago - it's fair to assume they were handled by mostly men.

Also, as someone who has over a decade of experience with rats, I can confidently say that lab rats tend to be more violent than rats bred for company or as reptile food. I had a pair of females from a lab that were never experimented on, in fact they were only born in a lab and spend around a month there, and yet they had already exhibited issues with social behavior. They were also terrified of men, and as they aged this did not go away. I'm aware this is anecdotal at best, but I think it's worth mentioning when talking about those experiments.

If anything, those experiments proved that rodents can't live peacefully with individuals they dislike in enclosed crowded spaces. Something that cannot really be applied to humans, I hate my loud neighbors but I never wanted to kill them or cannibalize them.

Lastly, I'm pretty sure we don't disagree on overpopulation. Obviously I don't think women should be forced to birth children, nor do I think low birth rates are a bad thing. I just happen to hate those experiments for how cruel they were and how often they're used by people from all over the political spectrum to prove a point, when in fact they were flawed at best and downright cruel and unnecessary at worst.

Behavioral sink is the term coined for social collapse due to overpopulation, based on rat experiments done in the 60s. Despite having plenty of resources, overcrowded conditions led to disruptive social behaviour that ultimately led to the extinction of the rat population run through Utopia 52. A key stressor in the experiment was that the rats were forced to eat together in groups of 60-80 as the population grew, something that rats rarely do naturally.

I'm a little amazed that despite global patriarchal panic about population decline and the 'need' for more babies, we seem to have forgotten what we already knew: overcrowded conditions can cause populations to collapse.

In addition, I think it's not only that the world is more crowded, but that our internet connectivity has made our brains more crowded. In the panopticon, we are never alone, nor are we interacting with a defined and limited social group - where we have a fairly consistent role to play in the overall group. Instead we are in continuous contact with a vast, amorphous parasocial audience.

This eternal crowd, where intimate connections are imitated but actually rendered impossible, creates a persistent loneliness that humans were never meant to endure. We are fundamentally social as a species, loneliness in a human is a form of torture. Shunning and exile are our oldest and most cruel punishments.

The behavioral changes that led directly to the extinction event in the rats are worth noting:

"Among the males the behavior disturbances ranged from sexual deviation to cannibalism and from frenetic overactivity to a pathological withdrawal from which individuals would emerge to eat, drink and move about only when other members of the community were asleep...Having reached a level of high population density, the mice began exhibiting a variety of abnormal, often destructive, behaviors including refusal to engage in courtship, and females abandoning their young. By the 600th day, the population was on its way to extinction. Though physically able to reproduce, the mice had lost the social skills required to mate."

[back-to-junko]

Hating on a woman who made a safe space for other women is insane to me. Her gym has the same equipment as a regular gym does so this post is just a straight up lie. These trans supporters will go to any lengths possible to hate on a woman making a safe space for other women because at their core they’re just misogynistic. Clearly everyone in the comments could see this was just misogynistic bullshit and that’s why they were turned off.

[back-to-junko]

[back-to-junko]

When TRAs say 'block and stay safe' about radfems, I always think: only one of these groups has conducted a mass shooting and it wasn't the radfems.

[back-to-junko]

Statistics- Again

men constitute 99.7% of strangulation attacks

men constitute 99.6% of acid attacks

men constitute 99.3% of child pornography

men constitute 99% mass shootings

men constitute 99% of rapist

men constitute 98% of homicide

men constitute 98% of forcible incest

men constitute 96% of child sex abuse

men constitute 95% of molesting cases

men constitute 99% of domestic abuse

men constitute 99% of drugging

men constitute 99% of stalking

men constitute 99% of human trafficking abuse

men constitute 99% of sex trafficking abuse

Men constitute 99% of animal abuse

Men constitute 98% of bestiality

86% of makeup companies are male 99% of advertising male 98% of modeling agencies 92% of fashion media is male 94% of the fashion industry is male

Women are 10x more likely to get raped, yet this is seriously underreported considering the dead bodies

1/3 of women internationally report being sexually assaulted. we know this number to be much higher due to autopsies reported in the census

Women are 400,000,000x more likely to DIE from RAPE

not one man has ever died from rape, accounts for no coroner report ever, whereas tens of thousands of women and children die a year.

50 million women are sex trafficking victims

women make up for 95% of labor trafficking

70% of child soldiers are FEMALE

25 million are forced into child marriages > 5

650 million are in arranged marriages/ marriages consummated below the age of consent

Men make up most 98% on average of every fetish community

99% for pedophilia.

in 70 countries - that comprise 26% of the world population, women need men's permission to learn, work, or travel.

There are 50 countries in which the law states you can sell and buy women into marriage. - These countries, including India and Pakistan, make up 38% of the entire world.

There are 178 countries that do not have the same legal rights for women, where written law specifically excludes women from freedom.

There are 2.4 billion women globally who are born in countries that have written law that restricts them completely, but even more so without a man.

6 billion people believe in a religion that states that women are less human than men

More Statistics Sources

[back-to-junko]

i find it really annoying when people only choose to talk about the pipeline of serial killers harming animals before they go and actually kill people but refuse to talk about how serial killers will also often watch violent porn and have kinks related to violence. the hatred of women is just as much as a link to male murderers as animal cruelty is but if we start to have that conversation means that we’d also have to finally realize that every single misogynistic man is most likely on the edge of going on a killing spree

[back-to-junko]

Pro tip: the wife always knows.

When there's a serial killer. When there's a rapist. When there's a thief, or a fraud, the wife always fucking knows. I've been saying this for years, and I will stand by it. The wives just don't care. They have rich husbands, they live in nice houses, and their bills are paid. Of course, they're accomplices. You saw it with Ghislaine Maxwell, and you're seeing it again.

[back-to-junko]

when a lesbian doesn’t want to have sex with a biological man:  penises and vaginas are analogous organs and are pretty much entirely the same lol.  Just get over it, stop being so unscientific and bigoted.

when you want aesthetic surgery done on your genitals: this counts as life saving support, penises and vaginas are so entirely different and people will die if they don’t have this procedure done

[back-to-junko]

Alternate working title:

“So You Want To Be A Cam Girl?”

[back-to-junko]

LMAO op turned off reblogs but this interaction is so funny to me

[back-to-junko]

"I read Jancee Dunn's book the night after I'd hidden in the bathroom, silently sobbing into a towel so I wouldn't wake the baby—or my husband, who was sleeping through his third consecutive night shift that I was somehow pulling alone, despite us both working full-time. I wasn't crying from exhaustion. I was crying because I had just calculated how much child support he'd have to pay if I left him.

This isn't a book. It's a goddamn mirror reflecting the darkest thoughts of every mother who's ever fantasized about abandoning her family at 3AM, not because she doesn't love them, but because she's drowning and her partner is standing on the shore checking his phone.

The Maternal Rage You Feel Isn't Mental Illness—It's Mathematics Dunn ruthlessly quantifies what most parenting books politely ignore: the raw numerical inequality of modern parenthood. When she tracks hours spent on childcare (her: 35 weekly, him: 9) while both work full-time, it's not anecdotal—it's violence. The liberation comes in recognizing your homicidal thoughts aren't hormonal or "crazy"—they're the rational response to systemic theft of your time, sleep, and identity while someone who claims to love you watches from the sidelines.

The "Mental Load" Isn't Just Unfair—It's Killing You Cell by Cell What devastated me wasn't just Dunn's account of doing everything—it was her scientific exploration of what invisible labor does to a woman's brain and body. The constant vigilance of tracking every family need doesn't just make you tired—it restructures neural pathways, elevates cortisol, and accelerates aging. When her doctor finds her blood pressure dangerously high while her husband's remains perfect despite their supposedly "shared" stress, the physiological consequences of inequality are laid bare. You're not imagining it—this imbalance is literally shortening your life.

Your Husband Isn't Just Annoying—He's Been Systematically Trained to Disable You The book's most chilling insight comes when Dunn investigates how her competent, intelligent husband develops "strategic incompetence" around domestic tasks. Her research reveals it's not accidental—it's subconscious warfare honed through generations of male socialization. The weaponized helplessness ("Where does this go?"), the learned blindness to mess, the performance of bumbling assistance—these aren't personality quirks but sophisticated tactics to maintain privilege while appearing supportive. I'll never hear "just tell me what needs done" the same way again.

The Fights You're Having Aren't About Chores—They're About Human Worth Dunn's epiphany comes not in cataloging tasks but in recognizing the existential question beneath them: whose time and peace matter? When her husband unthinkingly preserves his exercise routine while she hasn't showered in days, when he sleeps through night wakings because he "has work" (as though she doesn't), when he requires praise for basic parenting—the underlying message is that his humanity outranks hers. This reframing transformed how I understood my own marriage's breaking points.

You're Not Control-Freaking—You're Preventing Catastrophe The section that left me breathless was Dunn's dissection of "maternal gatekeeping." Her therapist suggests she's "not letting go" of child-rearing tasks—until she documents the actual consequences of her husband's cavalier parenting: a toddler left in soiled clothes for hours, forgotten medications, a child nearly hit by a car while dad texts. The gut-punch: sometimes the "perfectionist mom" narrative masks legitimate terror of what happens when the backup system fails. I've never felt more vindicated about my inability to "just relax."

Romance After Children Requires Blood Sacrifice—Usually Yours Dunn's unflinching examination of post-baby intimacy problems goes beyond fatigue to something darker: the resentment poisoning attraction. Her account of faking interest while mentally calculating how many hours of sleep she's losing made me physically flinch with recognition. The breakthrough comes not through date nights or lingerie but through radical redistribution of invisible labor. Her documentation of how performing oral sex feels easier than asking for help with dishes exposes how parenthood turns sex into another form of female emotional labor.

The Solutions Aren't Cute—They're Nuclear What elevates this beyond primal-scream therapy is Dunn's scorched-earth approach to reconstruction. She brings in hostage negotiators. Corporate efficiency experts. Therapists who specialize in high-conflict divorce. The message is clear: half-measures will fail. Her implementation of NASA's black box system for critical communication during arguments saved not just her marriage but possibly her husband's life. This isn't about better chore charts—it's about dismantling and rebuilding the entire operational system of your relationship.

This book should be handed to every couple in the delivery room, not as celebration but as warning. Dunn doesn't offer gentle suggestions for reconnecting with your spouse—she offers battlefield triage for the psychological trauma that parenthood inflicts on females and marriages."

This book is on my list of books that will forever change how you look at the actions of men (along with "Why Does He Do That" by Lundy Bancroft and others)

I heartily recommend it, even if you don't have or want kids, if you work with women in a mental health or healthcare setting.

[back-to-junko]

Something random that pisses me off is how autistic boys throw hands at their moms but not their dads. I have autistic male cousins that need a lot of support but I feel so bad for my aunt because they fucking beat her during their meltdowns, but when the dad is there? They WON’T. And apparently it’s not a unique thing either. Is it because they know they can get away with it? That they can physically overpower her? Anyone with knowledge about this topic please LMK.

[back-to-junko]