Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Police are never, and will never be,
required to endanger themselves in
any way for any reason. This has been
litigated thoroughly.
The argument cop reps make is that
nobody's job can require that they jump in
front of bullets or tangle with psychopaths.
This argument is reasonable, nobody's job
should demand the employee's death as a
condition of employment.
The obvious problem, of course, is that
cops' job is purportedly to protect people
from violence.
The corollary is that this is not a cop's
actual job. They have no duty to prevent
violence, no duty to put themselves at any
risk, no duty to help anyone.
No cop will ever be punished for refusing to
help, ever. Neither will they be reprimanded for refusing to put anything at risk.
This is why cops insist so hard that their
jobs are intrinsically dangerous! They don't
have to take any risks, so their narratives
emphasize that they are actually the
victims.
Corollary: never, ever believe anything a
press release tells you about what cops do
or did, because cops tailor them very carefully!
This is why cops primarily assault people
who are not armed, and why they do so
with deadly weapons. To minimize risk
The primary responsibility of any individual
cop is to minimize risk to themselves.
No cops 'confronted' the shooter, because
they could have gotten hurt. No cops
entered the school, because they could
have gotten hurt.
The tricky bit here is that they didn't let
parents help.
Because once they're on scene, and
protecting themselves, if they had let other
people get involved they would have
increased the risk to themselves, the cops.
And the cops' job is to show up, protect
themselves, and document their fear of
risk.
That's it.
This easily gets tossed up in the PR cops have traditionally done in the past.
"To protect and serve" is not a statement of duty.
No cop is required to protect or to serve. Most of us have some perception of a "good cop" who has responsibilities.
That is fiction.
Any portrayal of a "good cop" is not a
portrayal of a cop engaging in their job. If a
cop helps someone for any reason, it is
entirely external to their identity as a cop.
They might have done a "good thing"
but a doctor who holds the door isn't necessarily a "good doctor."
Eliminate this fiction wherever you
recognize yourself engaging in it.
Never fucking watch die hard again, never put your kid in a police costume, never instruct anyone to run to the nearest PD employee if in danger or engage in any police procedural.
Because when we collectively think cops
should be responsible or do any good, in
the smallest way possible, they will not.
This is why it's more dangerous to be
literally anyone else than to be a cop.
Everyone's job requires interaction with
danger. Teachers!, public servants, healthcare, mental health, the hospitality industry is incredibly dangerous, construction, etc. nevermind dealing with cops!
Cops make up a guy and then kill him for
their own safety.
Institutionally, police are pretty much the
only profession that permits its members to
arm themselves against a hypothetical
threat and then kill anyone who overlaps
with it.
The rest of us have to be polite, follow the rules, take direction, stand by and hope. Cops don't.
This is why cops hate civilians so much.
If a cop is in danger it is because a civilian
inconvenienced them.
Something bad happened, and a civilian
saw a cop nearby or attempted to invoke
one.
This causes risk to the cop. Punishable by
death.
Takeaway: it is dangerous just to call the
police. It is MORE dangerous, in many
ways, to call them rather than not because by exposing them to danger you give them excuses to punish, assault, or kill you.
And, as above, their job is to identify risk
and then eliminate the source.
In Uvalde, this is what happened. Cops
were seen by civilians, and they did what
cops do. They protected themselves, and
then controlled the most convenient source
of risk to their jobs - the civilians that saw
them.
And then they lied about it. Poorly.
1 note
·
View note
Text

Always on the wrong side
1 note
·
View note