bleachmist

[bleachmist]

“should be packing for dua lipa doing this instead” — dove cameron via tiktok

[bleachmist]

Jesus christ, I wish to just one day be this pinnacle of wit, horniness, and sacrilege.

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]

Where's my Jewish phrase for when you people are being irrevocably horny?

[bleachmist]

pass it around

[bleachmist]

Florence Pugh

[bleachmist]

Kristen Stewart

[bleachmist]

Hi I've been seeing a lot of posts with this weird tone so here's your friendly reminder that the RACK (risk aware consensual kink) kink framework doesn't actually mean "practice the safest possible kink at all times". It means there is ALWAYS risk and you should be aware of what those risks are before engaging.

A basic example is that I keep seeing that post with the safe impact zone chart going around being talked about as though it's the only way to do RACK impact. This is not true. The information is good and important to have, yes, but "safe impact zones" still have their risks, and there will always be people who want to be hit in "unsafe" ways. The correct RACK approach would be to properly research the risks of the type of impact you're planning to do, and make sure that you're comfortable with that level of risk before engaging in the activity, AND that you know what aftercare should be given. THIS is what risk-aware means. It does not mean "under no circumstances should anyone ever hit you in the wrong spot". That's kind of the antitheses of RACK.

RACK is about knowing the risks and consenting. It's informed consent. It's about doing what you want to do as safely as is reasonable. There is risk inherent in every type of kink. RACK says go ahead, have your fun, but just know what you're getting into first.

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]

Climb out my TV built like that I’m hitting the ghost cheeks

[bleachmist]

KESHA via Instagram (July 1, 2024)

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]

[bleachmist]