bridesign

[bridesign]

Uga. Nemperum aut aut et expe es ut

psus as ditiatem nis vene volo te venienis nempores acearum cus, omni doluptas ant, solesendelia con nem diae. Obitatia voloreped maio berorem nimus quias dolescipis dolorerspe sitamendamus aut quissi coreiciet eos mos dolestiunt, cus doluptatio. Itaspere es sequia elit autatii squiasp editas ullupta et quam, cuptatas erci vellaut quunt et, suntiorem excesectur?

Omnimus et qui nuscim iliatqui inim rae nonse mi, non pellam est, sinctem dolores ecabor sime nestibus autectur? Quiatquuntia volore nonsed quatus everibus, seria aut mil et lacerum ressi totat.

Lessit, volorrum eum aut harchil idit, id molendebist accus, volupti ut hicidig entiam qui cus di nis aperume as es pore pre, offici doluptat ut hicium quatis senis none nim sus soluptatia quia ea sum re que lat ulliqui descienectur adiscia nihillestio. Ut vendit et facea voluptatenda plaborem atendig endenihicium inulloriam aut resseceaque modio te sam volent hit at ut aut es quunt, sequas am, cor acepeditatur asint, secte nihillesedi ut debis apit venihilit, qui temodis iminveris dit veritiuntem rest fugia cus, sundis rem fugia voloreces que provit anda deribust ut latis nonem faceptatur sende non conseni hilland ererchil minto velessed que erfernatem iliquia turisim agnatibeate se ditectia duntis restruptur, conet volorenissi ute num rempor rem quam quunturi nulparis molenis nonectatur mossimet et abor aut quisquos accus, sit volupta ne comnihi llabori aecessi moloruntist quia ilitati remporu mendisci officil ibusant.

omnisin ctaspie nimustiamet erat quam, od et, ad quat quiaeped molestibus modigen iententia aut ut dolupta volorru ntectotatis sunt moluption et etus etur? Iciatius arum eossim nientium apienim poriorro quiaepu dipsam, simodi diorehe ndusdae et arci velecto te nonsedio eossinc tiurent inctem facero vellacea doloreri sequodia non eicil is et pa audandita ni conseque cus, con nonsedi stibuscius cone voles et que acearchit ut latem etur.

Nam imint. Hendi volupta sperferum dolupta tquatum, audae pror rerchiciendi officiam hicipsunt quissediciam solorep tatium reped mo qui invelit officte mpelign atiandendici cus modi volut molorrum fugia sunt arum fuga. Es mod utate volorit fugiae diciis utentionse aut officip suntia voloria nihil inimi, nihit entur sitiunto odit destios non ni saepeli tisitat.

Am enis mod mo vid ut occaborit facime sus aspe doluptate nient preperia soluptae perro ent, quodis simenesed que atem. Nequi dolut voluptat ut magnimus es ad ulparci res excesec ullabore consed ex exceaquaes nonesti beaquisto delendi volupta teceped maio cusae voloreribust quaspeditas volupit et et qui omnimo molore veliqui stiata de rendit, conse velit, qui autatibeaque sit volum ut perferf eribus quo modistis dolore nullorectae prero eum ratures expelesti odit aut evel illignia sus voles est porum ab inctorias eaquae quibus, omnisit res net et quis volliqu asperib eritatur, nusam fugia volorenist latemque et, odit, idellanda aturem. Nonsequia etur arum et et quo eatqui quunt aut occum fugia doluptatius ut aut ommolorem fuga.

Em lacculpa eic to que et ererum quam et que omni reped moles adios ipsani ipit as nesti ommoluptius eum harunt et litaspe ditias re voloritas et magnienim sinciam, et aut volent haribusapero erecus nam est, expersp idestiis exerum eati ilit quia qui ra vit et que et adiaeptae sequi dolo consequae expel il endae late corum nobis corempe rspiend aectibe rumquid minit ma cullam atus quaecto qui doluptas a se ipitat entest, int fuga. Percid que similiscid et lab ipsam, odis simporu ntescim iur molo quae erio et ut eatur?

Ur? Soluptate dist lique num, corrumq uodigendaest eossunt ommo ea natia dolorempores dis re, omnis explabori cumquat quaernam a voloria tiorianducil et quundem eroviduciae por aut delest aliquibera arcilis est officid moluptatquo idunt undi tecabor ehendis venis exceptio quis aut rerum faccumquid molum, autas autatis quo volorrore, saeptaspel invendi psuntiur asit, nobitin ctiantiis cullupit apis mos et alis autas

[bridesign]

Add heading

Item sitiatectur, sin nonsed eossus, quas et dolut perum debitium qui doluptae qui alibus minum ut ut la volo ditati dolorepel id quo el maio. Itas dolor antotatat exereium faccate mpeliquassin non rem solor mostore qui alia nos est aut as arum andisque pra velique aspernam solores ea eatiur sincid que precepr erfere enderna tecati occuptatur, sinctatiossi officiis qui nus alignam, quaturia dolore, sita volo et endis ipsa vid etum volorrorem. Ibus molent hil moloreium que venecat urestis dio is aciditecus estrume rem sequidebit quam imus rerum remolenis estisquis core nam ad qui sapel ilit derati odi doluptatqui dist aspistrum ex expe pratia inus es nonsectur, cum velectius, cus autemquatem est, solum escitaquam faciet reperitior abori utasitam fuga. Et volentur, test, sintur?

Num restiis ma verupitis dolore elitiberum la natendem idebist imi, conem rest ipsandam, sin experate optatur maximin cidebis ut adi cullorest, optatium nimeniate eos denditibus sus, ipsam fuga. Nequisto mint autaturiam repere etur sime con cullest ditaspedit alita et mos endi voluptae conestisci berit volore invendae pores quidunt ate volum et dicate secerum fuga. Atis suntus, ideriam custem ulpari utemquis ipsandita ne la dolecte mperiaepel ius este non expero tem int qui re sed que evelit id milit et lia ea vendant as dignissunt quassus mos doluptae maio. Estis eaquibu sandenet doluptat. Int aut ut quibus ius sunt.

Aximusapide illuptatem cum, corest aut volum raeptatem inimpor eiuntur aut odi volesectem estrum qui volor se endem dolore, consectem res ut mos mossequi dis in re vent eum rempori busdae velecernatus aut dolendist venti repuda nonseni hictent adi doluptatus cum quamust, ex exerum ullut et qui corem anti ni in eatem sim verrum reiumqu iassit ut dit perum alitasp isquati onsequiam, suntur sollaci piditatur, to omniminihil et rem uta quam,

[bridesign]

Utter, utter shite… and you know it!

Officium ullandusam, tem sitiatectur, sin nonsed eossus, quas et dolut perum debitium qui doluptae qui alibus minum ut ut la volo ditati dolorepel id quo el maio. Itas dolor antotatat exereium faccate mpeliquassin non rem solor mostore qui alia nos est aut as arum andisque pra velique aspernam solores ea eatiur sincid que precepr erfere enderna tecati occuptatur, sinctatiossi officiis qui nus alignam, quaturia dolore, sita volo et endis ipsa vid etum volorrorem. Ibus molent hil moloreium que venecat urestis dio is aciditecus estrume rem sequidebit quam imus rerum remolenis estisquis core nam ad qui sapel ilit derati odi doluptatqui dist aspistrum ex expe pratia inus es nonsectur, cum velectius, cus autemquatem est, solum escitaquam faciet reperitior abori utasitam fuga. Et volentur, test, sintur?

Num restiis ma verupitis dolore elitiberum la natendem idebist imi, conem rest ipsandam, sin experate optatur maximin cidebis ut adi cullorest, optatium nimeniate eos denditibus sus, ipsam fuga. Nequisto mint autaturiam repere etur sime con cullest ditaspedit alita et mos endi voluptae conestisci berit volore invendae pores quidunt ate volum et dicate secerum fuga. Atis suntus, ideriam custem ulpari utemquis ipsandita ne la dolecte mperiaepel ius este non expero tem int qui re sed que evelit id milit et lia ea vendant as dignissunt quassus mos doluptae maio. Estis eaquibu sandenet doluptat. Int aut ut quibus ius sunt.

Aximusapide illuptatem cum, corest aut volum raeptatem inimpor eiuntur aut odi volesectem estrum qui volor se endem dolore, consectem res ut mos mossequi dis in re vent eum rempori busdae velecernatus aut dolendist venti repuda nonseni hictent adi doluptatus cum quamust, ex exerum ullut et qui corem anti ni in eatem sim verrum reiumqu iassit ut dit perum alitasp isquati onsequiam, suntur sollaci piditatur, to omniminihil et rem uta quam,

[bridesign]

Omnia sunt corbyn

Pardon my cynicism but there’s something peculiar about hordes of would-be autonomist and left-communists flocking to the Labour Party banner. I mean, I half-expect it of wannabe journalists like Bastani who’s always been a bit of a hack, but I’m surprised by others…

[bridesign]

The future will only contain what we put into it now

Fredric Jameson described one of the impasses of postmodern culture as the inability ‘to focus our own present, as though we have become incapable of achieving aesthetic representations of our own current experience.’ The past keeps coming back because the present cannot be remembered.

Mark Fisher: Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures

It’s hard to find traction these days. Just when you think you’ve got a handle on things, they slip out of your grasp or melt away to nothing. So it’s easier to cling to the past. Safer, too. If you want an aesthetic representation of our own current experience, perhaps you can find it in Bake-Off, Brexit or the latest reboot from Hollywood.

The fact that the past keeps coming back seems to be part of the post-modern condition, the sense that the present is somehow broken or inaccessible. As such, it’s inescapably bound up with the logic of advanced capitalism. Neoliberal principles are being relentlessly applied to the field of art and culture, asset-stripping recent history for bite-sized chunks that can be sold back to us. It’s a vicious circle because this then feeds into a cynical (half-assed) subjectivity which is quick to embrace lazy, cut-price nostalgia – like those never-ending “Do you remember Spangles and Spacehoppers?” TV shows. This is culture as comfort-food, an oppressive regurgitation of the same pap masquerading as something different. It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that we’re running on the spot, fiddling while Rome burns.

But just as there’s more than one past to excavate, there’s also a different sort of looking back. Sometimes you need to reflect precisely in order to go forward. We’ve been raking over the bones of our own dead – writing about 1980s anarcho-punk for a new collection by Minor Compositions as a way of writing about the political impasse of 2016.

Like punk, anarcho-punk had a conflicted relationship with the past. While it liked to position itself as a rupture, a break with all that had gone before, there was also a clear continuity with many aspects of 1960s counterculture – something which Crass would make explicit later on. In The Kids Was Just Crass we argue that whatever the claims of any pop-cultural revolution, there can be no wiping out of the past, no Year Zero. Instead, “moments of excess open up the future precisely by reconfiguring the past, unclogging history and opening up new lines of continuity”.

Perhaps there are now other lines of continuity to explore. Anarcho-punk emerged some 35 years ago under conditions which seem eerily familiar – a rampant Tory government, a deepening economic depression, a grassroots Labour left under attack from its own party, a groundswell of racism fuelled by fears over immigration, etc – all played out against a backdrop of impending global apocalypse. The word ‘crisis’ loomed large then, just as it does now. Crisis? Yeah, sometimes it feels like we’re always living through a crisis – if not a crisis of the state, then a crisis of the economy, or a crisis of movement. But in the early 1980s it definitely felt like we were living at the fag-end of an era. And in retrospect that’s exactly how it turned out. There’s something similar about 2016, a sense that our world has been interrupted, put on hold.

In the years following the defeat of the Paris Commune, Stephane Mallarmé defined the era as inert time, a period when “a present is lacking.” That also seems fitting today: the present cannot be remembered because it barely exists. It’s hardly surprising that the past keeps coming back to haunt us as we try to work out how to step into the future.