Text
Kink and Fetish patch notes
Class and Ability Changes:
Due to increased popularity of the "Pup" subclass in Petplay builds, for balance reasons we are nerfing their low level abilities including "being leashed" and "wearing a puphood." to keep things fair, though, we're also rewarding those who heavily invest in late-game abilities by buffing "sleeping in a cage" and "clicker training."
Findoms abilities have been nerfed across the board in an effort to give Paypig players a better chance to continue playing. We're monitoring the situation.
Daddy players have lost their buffs from the Father's Day event
We are aware of the disparity between Top players and Bottom players, so we're removing the "Can Host" ability as a requirement for Top players in an effort to rally numbers up.
Drastically lowered the requirements to spec into Furry class
Added character "Oath Breaker Knight" for some players to restore their previous classes for a small fee (Gold Star Lesbian class should be a bit easier to spec into now)
Item Changes:
As mentioned above, items "Puphood" and "Collar & Leash" have been nerfed
Rebalanced "Chastity Cage" item effectiveness depending on player stats
Food items have been buffed to increased effectiveness
Fixed a broken interaction with the "Gag" class of items pertaining to the "Safeword" ability
Added new item combo interactions with other items, abilities, fetishes, and/or kinks. (Try out using the "Blindfold" and "Bondage Rope" items with the Piss fetish for the Urinal interaction.)
Fetish Changes:
Piss has been nerfed from Very Rare to Uncommon
Armpit has been nerfed from Rare to Common
Bondage has been nerfed from Uncommon to Common
Hypnosis has been nerfed from Legendary to Rare
Cuckolding has been nerfed from Uncommon to Common
Eye Contact has been buffed from Common to Rare
Condom Usage has been buffed from Common to Rare
Added new Very Rare fetish: Tongue Soaking
Added new Legendary fetish: Ghost Penis
Misc. Changes:
Fixed a glitch that low level players get the "Freak" banner usually granted at a much higher level
Further fixes to keeping servers seperated
Temporarily added more PVP options for Pride Month event
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
Music addiction is real. Almost every single day, I spend at least an hour just listening to music. The same songs over and over again, just to feel something, that rush of dopamine. As I get further addicted, soon enough the beetles aren't enough. Whitney Houston isn't enough. Not even fucking ELO is enough.
I listen to more and more depraved tunes, just to get my fix. Ive listened to many bad songs. Some that I will never be able to confess. (Anime opening) And it makes me fucking angry that this has become normalized in our culture. If you're a song-rotten "musicmaxxer" please join my subreddit "song free"
Our movement is backed by Charlie Kirk and Andrew Tate and Joe Rogan. Which means nothing. Here is a source that proves music addiction is real.
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
This little one acts completely feral unless you make the "mommy greeting kittens" noise at them. When my phone isn't making them unsure they will come charging to the front of the cage for attention by the second trill.
You can see the body language change in the ears with the first and second trill real well
109K notes
·
View notes
Note
Genuine question, what did Stalin think of Zionism?
Stalin as an individual was never a fan of Zionism (or Jewish nationalism in general). For most of his political life, he spoke out against such ethnic and religious chauvinism, for example saying in 1913 in "Marxism and the National Question" on the question of whether or not the Jewish people constitute a nation that it is only religion that connects the disparate Jewish diaspora communities, asking "how can it be seriously maintained that petrified religious rites and fading psychological relics affect the 'destiny' of these Jews more powerfully than the living social, economic and cultural environment that surrounds them?" In addition, in Chapter 6 of the Foundations of Leninism, "On the National Question", Stalin stressed the importance of combating colonialism and promoting the national liberation of colonies as part of a broader anti-imperialist struggle.
Yet it is from this same opposition to chauvinism that led him to condemn at every turn antisemitism and hostility towards the Jewish people. As he stated quite clearly to the Jewish News Agency in 1931, "Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism." In this vein of communistic opposition to antisemitism, upon the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee was founded in the Soviet Union in order to coordinate international support from Jewish communities abroad towards the Soviet war effort.
However, Stalin was neither a dictator nor an ideologue. His personal beliefs did not alone shape the policy of the Soviet Union, and he was often pragmatic in his dealings as a national leader. The Soviets, while initially advocating for a secular and multi-ethnic democracy in Palestine, ended up backing the partition of Palestine and the creation of Israel as a Jewish state. The Soviet representative at the UN, Andrei Gromyko, explicitly invoked the recent memory of the Holocaust in his defense for the Soviet decision, decades before the West would adopt the same rhetoric in defense of Israel (probably because such rhetoric had been associated with the communists at first.)
That said, I have not been able to find a single quote from Stalin in his own words expressing support for Israel or Zionism. While many sources make the mistake of identifying Soviet policy with Stalin's own thoughts and beliefs, whenever it comes to the question of Soviet support for Israel, it is always other members of the Soviet government who are quoted. I cannot say for certain that Stalin was not in agreement with the Soviet decision to back Israel at the UN, but I cannot say for certain he was, either.
Soviet friendliness towards Israel would not last for long. The Soviets had been convinced, due in no small part to the fervent efforts of Zionist diplomats both during and after the war, that Israel would be a neutral, even Soviet-leaning nation. The reality of the matter quickly asserted itself, as Israel almost immediately sought ties with Western powers upon independence, as well as conducting active propaganda campaigns trying to convince the Jewish citizens of the Eastern Bloc to emigrate. By 1948, the year following Israel's independence, the Soviet Union began efforts to combat Zionism as part of a broader campaign against "cosmopolitanism", or pro-Western and pro-imperialist sentiment. (It should be noted that while the anti-cosmopolitan campaign during this period has often been maligned as "antisemitic" by Western commentators, and while I will not claim there was no excess or intolerance involved, the campaign was not at all targeted towards Jews. Zionism, while widespread, was not a very popular political position among the Jewish members of the Eastern Bloc and the opposition against Zionism came just as much from Jewish communists as it did from non-Jewish communists.)
Relevant reading:
The Soviet Union and the Creation of the State of Israel, Gabriel Gorodetsky (a detailed look into the diplomatic efforts to achieve Soviet support for Israel, primarily from the Zionist perspective)
Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend, Domenico Losurdo (while not focused on Israel, it provides more information on the Soviet perspective on the matter during the chapter addressing claims of Stalin's antisemitism. It does make the mistake of identifying Soviet policy with Stalin's own beliefs, however.)
Human Rights in the Soviet Union, Albert Szymanski (this and the previous book discuss in part the charges of antisemitism relating to the anti-cosmopolitan campaign)
179 notes
·
View notes
Text
I will say, there is a contradiction in pro ship pro kink spaces with regards to perpetuating harmful rhetoric. Because we are constantly arguing against censorship on the legal level, it can become difficult to discuss more nuanced topics like tastefulness without it devolving into platitudes like "let people do whatever they want".
That being said, I don't think we can draw the lines around tastefulness based on the genre of fetish, no more than we can draw the lines around any other genre of media.
The majority of scifi is racist. Does this mean scifi is a racist genre inherently, that there is no potential for critique of racism? Obviously not. In turn, does that potential for critique mean that scifi is inherently revolutionary? Does it contradict the fact that most scifi, because we live in a racist society, will be racist? Also obviously not.
Lolisho porn can present opportunities to criticise the construct of childhood, but more often than not reinforces the idea that children are inherently innocent, their sexuality is inherently corrupt, and that they should be treated like property.
Incest porn can present opportunities to criticise the family and how the family enables patriarchs to enact violence on those 'below' them, but it can also reinforce the legitimacy of sexual violence as a right patriachs hold over their 'property' (wife and kids).
There are many fetishes I don't feel comfortable defending in specific because I don't know enough about them. BUT. I will always defend, on a more general level, that no topic is inherently 'wrong' to comment on in media, including in pornography.
1 note
·
View note
Text
A lot of people seem to think that accepting detrans fetish will cause more people to legitimately detransition. I think that actually it would probably cause less people to detransition, because they know that they can get off to detrans roleplay or be turned on transphobic stereotypes without it necessarily making them 'fake transgender' or a degenerate gooner male.
1 note
·
View note
Text
I don't see why detrans fetish is people's line they draw in terms of kink. Most of the people I see experimenting with detrans fetish are proudly transgender in a rather straightforward way but are working thru the trauma of being misgendered thru fetish OR they are nonbinary people or gnc transgender people who are using the fetish as an outlet to experiment with their gender. Many genderfluid TMA people experiment with this fetish because they feel demonised or ashamed for having a complicated relationship to gender, and so this is their outlet for those feelings.
I think it's pretty ironic to see people defending trans women/transfemmes/'its complicated' TMA men for being into sissy/femboy fetish stuff (which, i agree they should be defended) but disrespecting TMA people who are into detrans fetish. They're not doing gender fetish roleplay how you like. So what?
I will also say there's a difference between thinking detrans is an appropriate label outside of fetish vs. playing with the ideas surrounding the label detrans in the context of fetish from a critical perspective. Ultimately its fetish roleplay. Whether or not its harmful is determined by whether or not the participant/s can distinguish their fictional roleplay from reality. I don't think it's fair to assume a person can't, just because the subject matter is controversial or bleak.
1 note
·
View note
Text
BJ has a very clear understanding of Objectives unfortunately he lacks that level of comprehension when it comes to tactics methods procedures etc. Thus: his Behaviors.
58K notes
·
View notes
Text
r/undertale is so bored that they're just pretending that they know nothing about the game now and I'm starting to get worried about them
27K notes
·
View notes
Text


adventuring is fucking stupid anyway.
16K notes
·
View notes
Text
Walt actively denies Jesse's masculinity by sabotaging his relationships with women. Jesse having a girlfriend, a legitimate relationship with a woman? A ridiculous farce - she doesnt really love you, she's a whore and a junkie. Walt lets her die to keep Jesse for himself. Jesse has another girlfriend, this time a mother? Walt tells him to break up with her and later poisons their son to keep Jesse for himself.
Walter sees Jesse's relationships with men as a threat to his role as patriarch, and he sees Jesse's relationships with women as a threat to Jesse's role as bitch. If Jesse gets to step into his role as man, provider and protector, he'll stop being Walter's bitch.
327 notes
·
View notes
Text
next time youre hurling abuse into your headset playign video game.. think.... you never know who could be on the other side of the screan
4K notes
·
View notes
Text


Last year I taped sus jerma with glow in the dark eyes and teeth into the chicken coop to keep the raccoons away. He’s all sunbleached and moldy now.

Paint still works tho
16K notes
·
View notes
Text
A Manga About a Hero Who Pulled Out the Holy Sword and Became a Girl
734 notes
·
View notes