conclaveposting sideblog | Jaime, 20, any pronouns. art tag -> jrrart | ‼️‼️ MDNI 🔞‼️‼️
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Welcome to the Conclave Summer Fest!
Want to enjoy your Vatican summer? Want to see that Conclave beach episode you've always dreamed about? Want to send Pope Innocent XIV and his employees to the Philippines for a vacation?
This is your chance! Join the 2025 Conclave Summer Fest! Here, we we celebrate our favourite Catholics by putting them in summer settings!
🍹Sign up form: OPEN!!!
𓆉𓆉𓆉
Our official tag is #conclavesummerfest2025 ! Do tag our official blog @conclavesummerfest when posting your works here!
𓆉𓆉𓆉
🐳 Key Dates:
Sign-Ups open: 22 June 2025
1st Check-in: 6 July 2025
1st Round Submission Deadline: 17 July 2025
1st Round Reveal : 19 July 2025
2nd Check-in: 3 August 2025
2nd Round Submission Deadline & Sign-Ups close: 14 August 2025
2nd Round Reveal : 16 August 2025
𓆉𓆉𓆉
🌊 RULES:
Works should focus on Conclave (2024 / 2016) characters in a summer setting.
No AI-generated works are allowed. If you tag your work as AI-generated, we will not repost it on our social media.
There is no minimum or maximum requirement.
By signing up, you agree to:
1. Submit a prompt 2. Claim a prompt 3. Create a work based off the prompt
Self-prompts are allowed (Submitting a prompt and claiming the one you submitted)!
Need a tutorial in prompting? Refer to this link https://archiveofourown.org/admin_posts/147 !
You must have signed up for AO3 prior to this fest, so that you can claim a prompt. If not, you can register for an account now. The usual waiting time is about 2 weeks. The sign-up will be open until the 2nd round of submissions in August so don't worry :)
Most importantly: Have fun! 🦀🦀
𓆉𓆉𓆉
🐟 FAQ:
Is NSFW allowed?
Yes! Just properly tag it and you're good to go.
Is fanart / other non-written mediums allowed?
Yes!
Where is the link to the collection?
https://archiveofourown.org/collections/conclavesummerfest2025
Are original characters (OC) allowed?
Yes, but we encourage people to include in Conclave (2024 / 2016) background characters.
How can we contact you?
We are @/conclavesummer on Twitter and @conclavesummerfest on Tumblr (you are here now)! You can also send us an email at [email protected] !
More questions? Check out our faq tag !
𓆉𓆉𓆉
🏄 Our team consists of @lawrellinitez (Mod Del), @mindwarning (Mod Laine), @mille-preakers (Mod Kama), @spottedsplat (Mod Spotted) and @emptiiwatertank (Mod Denn). We are excited to launch this fest and see what you guys can create with the prompts!!! Don't be afraid to reach out to any of us and enjoy your Pope summer! 🐋❤️
𓆉𓆉𓆉
Official Discord Server: Still a WIP, will be launched once it is ready!
𓆉𓆉𓆉
TAG DIRECTORY:
#faq: We answer your queries! Check through this tag to see if the question you want to ask has been answered.
#fanfic: Fanfic tag for the fest.
#fanart: Fanart tag for the fest.
#misc fanworks: Fanworks that aren't fic or art tag for the fest.
#author reveal: Tag for the author reveals.
94 notes
·
View notes
Text

Thomas skipped both breakfast and lunch
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
The Ashtray — Queer-coding and Intimacy Subtext between Aldo Bellini and Giulio Sabbadin

an analysis of the ashtray in Bellini's suite, the chess match in progress, shot compositions and adding my interpretation that Robert Harris uses queer-coded phrasing to imply an intimate connection between them beyond what we see on the surface.
Grab your tinfoil zucchetti. But not really. Jokes aside, I don’t want to “prove” anything, just to point out the potential significance of this and how it relates to the two characters in question. This is based on Robert Harris' phrasings in his book, classic queer-coding in literature, the long-lasting history of gay men in the Catholic church and shot composition analysis. My credentials are a summer course on film at NYU, former member of the chess club at school and being gay with an autistic brain.
This post was what made me notice the ashtray, credit to OP for pointing it out. I thought it was a cool detail. When editing a random clip, I noticed how the ashtray is then revealed to us in this scene. This is the first shot from the angle where we see Bellini sitting next to the chessboard and you can see Thomas is covering the rest of the table:

It is only when Thomas moves that we see the ashtray:

[this covering/uncovering technique is also seen when they all turn to look at Agnes in the cafeteria and Tedesco is blocking Benítez sitting in the back until he walks and we can see him]
We then get another angle of Bellini and the table and this shot includes the chair on the other side of the table that we also couldn’t see in the first shot:

Talking to my tiktok pal @tomwambsgansdarkglasses about this, I took a closer look at the chessboard and wondered: Did Bellini memorise and preserve the last chess match against his friend the late pope, keeping it there as a reminder? Has Bellini been playing chess against himself during the conclave? Why is the ashtray there and what does it represent? Does the chessboard represent the late pope/the papacy/Bellini’s inner turmoil? The table features quite a lot in this sequence (covered, uncovered, stared at by Bellini at one point, next to him in the wider shot and blurred in the end). Here’s a clip:
I. The chess match
I returned to the first scene where we see the last match against the late pope and I don’t think this is the same match preserved. There’s enough to assume this is a different match. Different pieces have been taken. Not to mention how impractical it would be to preserve the last match and take it with him for the conclave. Considering what Bellini says to Lawrence in the beginning, we can also assume the late pope was winning, playing with the white pieces and Bellini playing with the black pieces.

II. Is Bellini playing against himself?
It’s not uncommon for chess aficionados to play against themselves so that was my first assumption. Of course the ashtray may be just a meaningless addition by the set design, same as the extra chair and he was playing both sides. But if we assume the ashtray was put there for a reason, taking into account the table features in nearly every shot of the entire sequence, there’s a chance the implication is that he isn’t playing against himself. Another thing my pal pointed out was: Why would he be placing the pieces taken differently, some organised, the others dropped? And more, wouldn’t it be more practical to be placing the taken pieces on the side so he doesn’t have to reach for the other side of the table? Wouldn’t it be easier to remove the ashtray to get more space? The chessboard has already been introduced to us as an accessory associated with Bellini’s chess interest/his grief/friendship with the late pope/papacy. The chessboard could be on the table by itself and it would make no difference. There’s no need for the chair on the other side too. We can see this is a suite and a bigger room than Lawrence’s through other elements in this sequence. Why the ashtray?
III. The ashtray
Around 10 minutes before this scene takes place, we see Bellini, Lawrence and Sabbadin in the stairwells, where we see Sabbadin smoking. This is his fourth scene (auditorium, bus, breakfast, stairwells) and the first in which he’s smoking. So far we’d seen Bellini and Sabbadin often side by side and surrounded by others but never in an intimate setting just the two of them. To me this can be interpreted as a glimpse into all that we haven’t seen, those two characters being closer than what we had previously seen. There’s an ongoing match happening, perhaps started when the conclave began, perhaps because Bellini relaxes through playing. Where did they go after the auditorium? Where were they before knocking on Lawrence’s door before the stairwells? If they’ve been playing chess since the conclave began, they might have been in each other’s company, just the two of them, every night in Bellini’s suite. There’s intimacy in that. While we see it’s common for the cardinals to be visiting each other in their rooms for canvassing or socialising, this is a level beyond that once you consider Bellini’s queer-coding and the subtle implication of intimacy this brings, using their dynamic in the book as foundation. In a story about the Catholic church, widely known for having a gay subculture and being a common destination for gay men, it seems like an oversight not to make a single nod to homosexuality and queer-coding, in my view. This piece of visual subtext seems to mirror the queer-coded phrasing chosen by Robert Harris in the book to describe their dynamic and the characters, which we’ll revisit soon.
Moreover, if he’s been playing against Sabbadin, he’s playing with the white pieces and winning. Sabbadin, sitting on the side of the ashtray, is playing with the black pieces (emo “undertaker” core). Bellini’s taken pieces are all organised on his side. The few white pieces taken aren’t equally organised, some are dropped near the ashtray.
If the chessboard represents Bellini’s inner turmoil, the late pope, the papacy, the grief, wanting and not wanting, the ashtray represents Sabbadin and his intimate connection to the man himself and the papacy, since he has an interest in becoming Secretary of State in a potential Bellini papacy. The chessboard and the ashtray, side by side. The potential relationship between the two as an added factor in understanding both characters. When Bellini looks at the table, frustrated and not knowing what to do about the simony discovery and what this will mean for the election, he looks at the chessboard and the ashtray. Sabbadin’s point of view is one he has been taking into account throughout the entire narrative and stands next to his inner turmoil and his grief. We had seen that proximity but here we see a potential glimpse into exactly how close their relationship has been through some visual subtext of queerness and intimacy. Watching the film after having read the book, it seems like a visual way of adapting dialogue and descriptions from the book that didn’t make into the movie.
— Further queer-coding in the book (or why I interpret them as being together, in the book at least and don’t think that’s any reach)
I had pointed out before the moments between them in the book are more personal than professional. I like this one where Bellini snaps and brings up his father + first name:

And my favourite being the line that shows not only that Sabbadin has been to Bellini’s suite but also that he chooses to point this out to Lomeli when there was no reason to do so and he could have simply said “I have a suite” or “some of us have suites”:
The book also brings the information Bellini had been Archbishop of Milan before him and of course Sabbadin is introduced in the book as Bellini’s praetorian guard, which, again, is very unique wording:

And Harris doubles down on the description by making Lomeli say in the next page:

In conclusion, I just find this all very interesting and my intention is to explore this visual detail in the cinematography with my interpretation of the queer-coding of Bellini/Sabbadin as a couple in Harris’ book. Thanks to OP for pointing out the ashtray in the first place, thanks to @ tomwambsgansdarkglasses for going through this with me at 1am last night.
PS: If you think my tinfoil zucchetto is too big already, just wait till you find out that I went to sleep trying to discover what that blue led display in the right corner of the shot/on the other table in his suite is. A minibar/electric kettle/coffee maker that each cardinal has in their suites? I’ve checked the tutorial of Tremblay’s coffee machine and that one seems only his own. I’m trying to find the exact match. This is my idea of fun.
244 notes
·
View notes
Text

Pope Innocentius XIV.
Also SHAMELESS self promo, Commissions are open, also support me on Patreon and Ko-fi, info is in pinned post!!
2K notes
·
View notes