Chucho / He-Him / Mexican / 21 / Artist and Graphic Designer / Marine Biology Nerd
Last active 3 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
607 notes
·
View notes
Text
#miraculous ladybug#mlb la terreur au#marc anciel#lt marc#my beautiful faggot son who could kill a man...
774 notes
·
View notes
Text

Okay, next on my list is Dr. Leo Anders, formerly known as Levko Andriienko. He would be a great conversationalist!
I'm going to go back and make minor changes to some of the bios that are already up (just color corrections and making sure everything is updated), so just letting y'all know!
Background
Born Levko Andriienko
Levko = means “lion,” representing strength, courage, and a fierce will to survive (ironic)
Diminutive form - implies a boyhood identity, or something emotionally vulnerable.
Andriienko = Ukrainian surname from Dnipropetrovsk region, symbolizing resilience and intellectual tradition; rooted in family and place, it connects him to the past
In Soviet context, his full name subtly marked him as "not quite Moscow"
Born 1933, in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukrainian USSR, into a modest family of engineers and educators
Showed early aptitude for physics, studied nuclear science in Moscow during the 1950s
Raised with strong faith in Soviet ideals, believed in science as a tool for progress and societal good
Chernobyl Disaster (1986):
Senior scientific advisor involved in emergency response at Chernobyl nuclear plant
Was one of the scientists who proposed the use of boron compounds to absorb neutrons and limit radioactive fallout, a key but little-known intervention
Witnessed firsthand Soviet government secrecy, misinformation, and chaos during crisis management
Worked as one of the liquidators who was not compensated properly
Exposed to high levels of radiation, suffering long-term health consequences
Deeply traumatized by the disaster and the suffering of victims, burdened by survivor’s guilt
Post-Disaster Years:
Emigrated to Graubünden, Switzerland soon after the disaster, rejecting the Soviet system and Ukrainian identity publicly
Chose Switzerland due to its priority of safety in science field as well as for its advanced healthcare
Changed his name to Leo Anders
Shedding a name with history for one that sounds clean, Western, untraceable
“Leo” is still “lion,” but now generic - a hollow echo of his true self
“Anders” is Scandinavian/Germanic - means “different” or “other”
Lived in relative isolation; worked on independent research, disconnected from official scientific communities
Physically weakened by chronic radiation sickness: fatigue, thyroid problems, neurological symptoms, lung deterioration
Haunted by memories and guilt, avoided public attention and political engagement
The Council’s Contact (1988):
Approached by the council
Initially skeptical, but accepted their offer for renewed purpose and resources
Began advising the Council on sensitive, secret projects with far-reaching ambitions
Bound by secrecy and loyalty, conflicted over his role and the Council’s shadow agenda
Life in Switzerland and Personal Struggles:
Experiences recurring nightmares and PTSD symptoms tied to Chernobyl trauma
Has obsessive behaviors and is very concerned with health/safety
Torn between hope for positive change and fear of complicity in the Council’s morally ambiguous plans
Uses work as a custodian of classified scientific and nuclear data for the Swiss government to channel his need for control and order (irony)
Present Day (2016):
Age 83, physically frail but mentally razor-sharp, a man who exerts power through knowledge and control
Custodian of classified nuclear and scientific data for the Swiss government, guarding secrets that could unravel nations - or rebuild them
"Order and method are his Gods" - Agatha Christie about Hercule Poirot
Every piece of information is meticulously cataloged and controlled to maintain a fragile balance
Obsessed with control and precision, he micromanages access to information like a vigilant, overbearing guardian - protecting the world from chaos, even if it means suffocating it
Deeply cares about the world’s survival, but his care manifests as relentless interference - an unyielding “helicopter parent” who won’t let anything deviate from his plan
Ruthlessly pragmatic, he believes the ends justify the means; innocent casualties and moral compromises are unfortunate but necessary collateral in his vision of stability
Haunted by his trauma at Chernobyl, he projects his guilt into a compulsive need to prevent further disasters through absolute order
Uses his position to manipulate political players and shadowy organizations, ensuring no secret slips, no chaos erupts
His “children” are watched closely and corrected swiftly
Lives behind layers of secrecy and detachment
Privately struggles with the suffocating burden of his responsibility and his inability to truly protect those he cares for
Design Notes/Character Study
Mirror to Victor Serdtsev
Both academics around the same age who were under the USSR but each turned out VERY different
Inverted color schemes
Take design points and swap them
Holds a handkerchief for his mild hemoptysis
Hunched
Shaky hands
Obsessive behaviors
See Poirot for reference
Very concerned with health and safety
"Helicopter parenting" - authoritative ideology comes from care, not apathy
Associations with Boron: Boron has 3 valence electrons, like the symbol on the atom
Years in isolation made him awkward in social environments
Formally dressed, but with a deeply casual, cerebral, sometimes haunted energy; rumpled, disheveled
Neutral palette
References: President Snow, David Attenborough, Richard Feynman, Noam Chomsky, Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy in Oppenheimer)
Time has not been kind - emphasize his age
Pictured:
Reference to Gloria Ramirez tragedy: emphasizes his ideals of utilitarianism
Reference to Polonium-210 assassination: ironic given his hatred towards the Soviet Union
Assigned a brown color scheme: he is stuck in the past despite his attempts to leave it
106 notes
·
View notes
Text
[ STROBE WARNING ]
SOMETHING BAD'S COMING THIS WAY
40 notes
·
View notes
Text

萩原 卓哉/Hagihara Takuya
Archive
431 notes
·
View notes
Text

萩原 卓哉/Hagihara Takuya
Archive
823 notes
·
View notes
Text
plenty of sea in the fish or some shit like that idfk
40K notes
·
View notes
Text
Cause some people in my inbox were wondering what rose’s scholarship was for :3
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
HAPPY PRIDE MONTH!!! LESBIAN ADRINETTE!! or bi4bi too!!!
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Heehee my redesigns so far... I feel like you can tell some of them were made around the same time periods... Like some of them fit together and some of them don't if you know what I mean. BUT I STILL LOVE TJEMMMM
163 notes
·
View notes
Text
Eminath for those who want it
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
my lil guys,,,,,
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
I come from a culture that has no nudity taboo - nudity is not considered inherently sexual, or somehow traumatising to witness. What that means in practice is that there is a clearly drawn line between sexual and non-sexual nudity. There is nothing wrong or inappropriate about nudity in a sexual context, and nothing wrong or inappropriate about nudity in a non-sexual context. However, it is 100% inappropriate to be nude in a situation where it is not obvious from context whether this is sexual or not.
I've seen random kids who briefly escaped from their parents bolt across a public park buck-ass naked after they were playing in the water fountain and their parents were in the middle of changing their kid from wet clothes to dry clothes when the small nudist escaped. Changing your small kid's clothes right there in public is ok because there is obviously nothing sexual about a child whose clothes got wet. But although people will have baby pictures of their kids in the bath or just running around the house like that because sometimes little apes hate clothes for some reason, it's considered common sense to not share those pictures on facebook mom groups and such, because you have no way of knowing who's seeing them, and that blurs the line of context.
It all boils down to the clearly defined context. Bathing nude in the same sauna with five of your co-workers at the office christmas party? Clearly nonsexual, therefore completely fine. Your friend-with-benefits inviting you to come over and opening the door in nothing but a doggy collar and the most porn-scented perfume? Clearly sexual, therefore completely fine. A woman checking her breasts for lumps in the gym lockers just before or after a shower? Clearly non-sexual, therefore completely fine.
But if you went to the bank today and there's some guy who walks in and immediately strips naked, doing his banking business wearing nothing but a deep smile and being clearly very content with this situation, you have no way of telling whether he's getting kicks out of this or not. There is no contextual reason for him to be nude. Therefore, that is inappropriate.
Then you go home and post on tumblr - as one does - going like "there was some dude completely fucking buck-ass naked in the bank today. That was fucking weird and I wish he had not done that." And someone immediately swoops into inform you that actually nudity is not inherently sexual or inappropriate, and there are cultures out there that have no nudity taboo. It's not fair to call somebody a freak for something like that, maybe that guy was just finnish.
63K notes
·
View notes