cornchipz-revival
cornchipz-revival
hello darkness, my old friend
196K posts
Jim (Imojen) they/them. Original recipe poster since like, 2010.
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
"gee I wonder how I will transfer this information reliably across long distances"
the trustworthy telecommunications dish:
Tumblr media
80K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
7K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
9K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
One of those insidious little things I notice sometimes is how much the window of 'appropriate for children' content has shrunk within the past 20 years. The range of things it is socially acceptable to show a 10-year-old has never been more limited, and it's happened incredibly quickly.
Take, for instance, Star Trek: TNG. I grew up watching TNG. I was a little young for it as it was airing, but it got syndicated almost immediately and they would show an episode most weekday evenings on the Space Channel, and I'd watch it with my lifelong Trekkie mom. This was a very common thing. I was by no means unusual for watching Star Trek as a child.
Star Trek: TNG has lots of sex in it! It's never explicit (unless you have a particularly niche interpretation of some of the borg stuff) but on many an occasion you'll have a few characters doing a bit of making out followed by a closing door or fade to black, and then they wake up in bed together. If you know what sex is, you know that is what is being implied here. Even my 8-year-old self, whose understanding of the subject mostly came from books of ancient mythology that used words like 'ravish' and 'the pleasures of the couch' a whole bunch, could tell that what was happening was sex.
And I am not bringing this up as a 'see, I watched all this inappropriate stuff and I turned out just fine!'. I'm bringing it up to argue that TNG's level of sexual content is not inappropriate for children (I'm not using the legalese 'minors', because I think that lumping children and teenagers together in this conversation would make it nonsense. Star Trek is obviously appropriate for teenagers. Don't use 'minors' when you mean either children or teens, it just muddies the waters).
The point is that Star Trek: TNG was very obviously designed to be watched by children and teenagers. There's a whole character in the main cast whose role in the show is to be an audience insert for children and teenagers. The moral tone of TNG, its occasional dips into 'don't do drugs, kids' type messaging, and its general avoidance of graphic violence all scream 'we are designing this with an audience of children - but not just children - in mind'. It's a family show. It's supposed to be watched by the whole family.
Which means that, until at least the end of the 90s, this amount of sexual content was generally considered appropriate for kids to see. It's not pornographic - it's not even graphic. Maybe the very most conservative parents wouldn't let their kids watch TNG, but that might have had more to do with all the socialism and atheism.
So, why did that change? Why do we now have such a strong bullwark between 'things kids are allowed to know about' and 'things for GROWN UPS ONLY 18+ Minors DNI', and why have we relegated even the most discreet references to sex to the second category only?
And the next time you find yourself experiencing that knee-jerk 'think of the children' reaction, consider: would what you're looking at have been ok on Star Trek: TNG in the 90s?
21K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
somehow, amazingly, i have hacked the impulse that makes me mindlessly scroll on my phone. it's not gone but i've paired it with a conscious thought process that goes like, "what's my goal here? i'm looking for entertainment, for information, for something that makes me feel more optimistic and interested in the world i live in..."
and because that kicks in between apps, too, i'm not doomscrolling as much. i'm intentionally seeking out posts or videos or whatever that actually mean something to me. when i'm not satisfied i walk away or pick up a book instead. most subtle yet impactful change i've gone through in years
i did not intentionally set out to change this. i've just been working on my mindset in general. hey, turns out having a good therapist again helps
45K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
socal Media app perfec t size for put personal ID in to age veryify! inside very Safe and Web Security info kept safely put ID in Social Media Website. Put ID In Social Media Website. no problems ever in soccial media website because good third party App and Privacy for personal information sensitive of private state issued ID. Asocialmedia Website yes a place for a legal ID put ID in social media website can trust social media website for keepeing good secret of identity. friend social media
16K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
I think the concept of introversion may have harmed a lot of people, tbh
5K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
My Chemical Romance at Zac's Basement, New Brunswick, NJ, 2002 | source
[August 20, 2023]
2K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 2 hours ago
Text
Tumblr media
??????
7K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
i think eventually we're all just gonna have to come to terms with the fact that it's impossible to tell a story with any degree of subtlety or nuance without risking a portion of the audience taking the "wrong message", and that's ok. art isn't meant to be strictly a teaching tool, and if you're goal is just to convince people or critique an idea, just write an essay or a polemic
45K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
whichever ad exec at Geico came up with the phrasing "up to 15% or more" needs some kind of award for concocting one of the most meaningless strings of words in the English language. all it guarantees is that the number is either lower or higher than 15%, inclusive. up to 15%... or more. a bladeless knife with no handle.
13K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gift by Zezhou Chen
313K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
I absolutely hate Brigitte Macron BUT I am so glad she is suing Candace Owens for transvestigating her. Hopefully this gets the ball rolling on justice for other victims and makes transphobic weirdos think twice before making expose deep dives on what genitals they think strangers have.
1K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
Eshkachech being sung with cave acoustics??!
3K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
i really wish there was any sort of actual reliable data on whether or not weed is addictive because it feels every single source on the topic is either:
"being in the same room as marijuana will cause infinite and eternal health problems" - Christian Moms Against Drugs [subsidiary of the heritage foundation]
"weed is the ultimate plant and it can treat any disease or ailment and has no risk or downsides at all" - stoner joe's dispensary
4K notes · View notes
cornchipz-revival · 3 hours ago
Text
46K notes · View notes