Jay. They/Them. Mostly Mischief Theatre. Some Starkid too.
Last active 3 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002)
🎬 Peter Jackson
+ IMDb trivia (FotR trivia)
18K notes
·
View notes
Text
as someone who loves the late for work/party quirks (my personal favorite improv game in general) videos, the best part is every time they’re quite literally just screaming the answer at aj and it will still end up taking like 20 more seconds before he understands
114 notes
·
View notes
Text
me: sees a picture of tom that i havent seen before
me: gets all giggly bc WHY DOES HE LOOK SO GOOD
also me: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHY CAN I NEVER LOOK LIKE THIS GUY
photo this is about:
71 notes
·
View notes
Text
Strong belb X fruity henchman
You see the vision
79 notes
·
View notes
Text

very inspired by @i-may-be-an-emu ’s template which is here!!
97 notes
·
View notes
Text
Am I wet? Am I on my period? Did I pee my pants?- next on wtf is going on down there.
2M notes
·
View notes
Text
The defeated and bloodied king was chained to kneel in front of his enemy and he says weakly: "Is my wife still alive?" His enemy nodded. "You fools," he said smirking, and the king starts laughing as the sounds of explosions getting closer shake the room.
71K notes
·
View notes
Text

Tom’s in the live chat and he’s so sweet
96 notes
·
View notes
Text
SFTH edit that definitely didn't make me insane :D
#only realised the song part way and lost my mind more#this is gorgeous#we love improv deaths#i’m fully counting who dies/murders the most in their long forms for my own obsession#shoot from the hip
90 notes
·
View notes
Text


I love seeing them smile and laugh on the sides of the scenes :)))
119 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's incredible, really, how wanting to know what happened in the past can be an even stronger hook in a story than wanting to know what happens next. The urge to understand why things are the way they are, even knowing that it can't be changed, is so powerful
3K notes
·
View notes
Text

been thinking about how I would design certain SFTH characters (CDIYW characters in particular) and realized that (at least to me) Amanda lehan-canto is the perfect Amanda Wilson in my mind.
#oh my god#this is amazing#she was infiltrating my perception of the character and i didn’t even know
34 notes
·
View notes
Text
the author's barely disguised longing to be a real person
29K notes
·
View notes
Text
We need to clear something up: nonbinary or agender aliens and robots aren’t problematic. Neither are ace or aro ones. These are normal traits that you’d expect of robots and would not be surprising in aliens.
I’m bringing this up because I’ve seen some really weird criticisms lately that take the stance that if you make a robot that has no gender or sexuality, that’s somehow… bad? That a single sex alien race, or a trisexed alien race, or a hermaphroditic alien race, is somehow inherently insulting to trans people? And this take is fucking baffling to me! These are exactly the traits you would expect in robots and aliens! (This applies to robots that seem to act autistic, too; many common autism traits also happen to be traits that you might expect in artificial intelligences.)
I can see the logic. At some point, we noticed all the stories with human cis men and human cis women who were almost entirely heterosexual, and some robot who doesn’t have a gender and explains this to someone at some point, and some people went “woo, agender representation!” and then everyone had to be like “that’s not agender representation, it’s a robot.” Which is correct; the robot happens to be agender, but if none of the humans are then having all the robots be agender isn’t agender representation. So some people started thinking that the robot was the problem. The robot isn’t the problem. The robot is fine. The problem is the humans. The robot’s existence isn’t some insult to the agender community, or the nonbinary community, or the ace or aro or autistic communities, depending on what traits it was given. It’s not representation, but it’s not an insult.
“Oh, but making all the robots asexual is saying that being asexual makes someone a robot!” No. It doesn’t. Making none of the humans asexual and making them all confused by it and having them treat it like some big division is what says that. “Making aliens that don’t have genders gives the impression that genderless people – ” NO. IT DOESN’T. Making all the humans cis people who treat the absence of gender as a weird alien thing is what does that.
The aliens and the robots are fine. They’re not the problem. The lack of diversity among human characters is the problem.
13K notes
·
View notes