crittercisms

[crittercisms]

Y’know I really didn’t expect this situation to play out like it did. I guess now we wait for Sinnoh’s response, supposedly he’s making a document with Reki.

Hello Anon! I agree with this ask and it’s the most respectful one we’ve gotten since the bombshell that dropped yesterday so I’ve chosen to reply to this. I did not expect it to go this way in any form, and if I had frankly I would not have made this account at all. The situation has become more serious than tumblr drama as now it is causing very real harm to innocent people.

To add to this, I will not be covering any posts about Sinnoh. No matter what happens in that situation someone was seriously harmed and that is way beyond what this controversy started as. I am not comfortable in any way talking about such serious topics on a blog like this, I am not qualified and nor am I in a space to speak about it. My team agrees on this fully.

I hope anyone who was affected by Sinnoh and his actions is okay, and know that there are resources to get help. If you are a bystander but still feel very strongly about this, not only I but my entire team encourage you to take a step away from the internet and step far away from this situation.

I will be rethinking my exposé posts (name still in progress) going forward as many have stepped away from this situation due to the path it has taken, and to clarify: I do not blame any of these people at all. I believe I will make one large post covering all of my thoughts while trying my best to not target anyone directly. None of these posts will talk about the Sinnoh situation to make this abundantly clear, they will only cover the initial Reki/Chocoperrito/Chococritters controversy. I may also wait until aforementioned document comes out as it could change people’s opinions (better or worse).

-Dallas, 🍋‍🟩 in conjunction with my team, special mention to 🧭.

[crittercisms]

Hello everyone! In an attempt to not seem like I have a tyrannical reign over this account; Basile (👜 as you may recognize him) stated that if you want more of his humorous replies and brute honesty you can direct them to his personal account! @bazilehazee

Anything you want to say to him directly can be directed there, especially if you want to tell us to kill ourselves. If you want it featured on this account it must be sent to our inbox, not his, and vise versa!

-Dallas, 🍋‍🟩 in conjunction with 👜

[crittercisms]

can this place be used for confessions n shit about cc & everything else as well? i’m asking because i feel as though confidential critters should not be owned by someone who is openly friends with a bunch of the ex staff on here. basically if you have an opinion/GENUINE question that they don’t like you’re 100% gonna get shit on by like… all of them

We are open to confessions! Some may just be posted with little to no feedback as I am a busy person, but if one particularly strikes me I may write some feedback similar to other confession accounts such as Arch’s blog and the (as of writing this) defunct Confidential-Critters. In no way will my feedback responses be to invalidate your experience as whatever you have to say matters!

-Dallas🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

multiple people should not own this account. if anything, the og owner can communicate privately with the others and post the others’ statements or whatever, without giving access to multiple people.

Good morning Anon! This is what I plan on going forward, asks are directed toward my team and I am allowing them to consult. All responses will be made by me, with the help of my team, and I’m thinking of crediting them via the emojis as they cannot speak themselves but I do believe they still have a place on this blog. Thank you for your concern!

-Dallas🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Editing of posts!

It has come to my attention that Sakri’s collective pronouns are they/it! I was genuinely unaware of this and will be correcting this immediately!

In the future, if you see this, please correct us through an ask and not through a post we cannot see on this account as we are blocked! I completely understand if they do not want to unblock us as this account as it stands feels very targeted attackish, but if you are one of their friends or even just view their account, please please please dont be afraid to correct us!

Thank you for your time.

-🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Apologies for reblogging ourselves but I have deleted the posts of my colleagues responding to mentioned asks, these are the only posts that have been or will be deleted. Again I apologize for the inappropriate actions of my team. -🍋‍🟩

Addressing Criticisms of Crittercisms

TW for mentions of threats of suiduce and self harm (brief mentions)

As the title suggests, I intend to make this short and sweet. As Vic predicted, and I can say now that I saw coming, some of us on this account have different views on things from others. Going into this I believed that we agreed to keep this account ‘professional’ and purely based on our collective opinions on the Chococritters/Chocoperrito situation. Clearly, if you’ve seen any of the reblogs and posts from others on this account some of us do not share this sentiment. I do intend to make follow-up posts in succession with my current ‘series’ if you will of calling out hypocrisy and misconception between different blogs, not only Sakri.

I want to extend an apology on my behalf if my initial post caused any harm to Sakri and his blog, as well as his friends Earl, Vic, and Confidental-Critters. I did not mean to send any harassment their way, and believed that I made it very clear that this account is not to rally a witch-hunt in any way.

I was well aware upon the creation of this account that many get very defensive (on every side) when it comes to internet drama. This account has not sent any asks to another account to my knowledge, however I do not have control of that my team does. In the following paragraphs I want to clear up any misunderstandings or (despite accidental, still relevant) misinformation that has been shared.

Starting with, in my initial post I had stated that Sakri had claimed that Reki changed the rule allowing IRL’s and DA’s to proxy in CC. 🌸-anon corrected me stating that the rule was not changed to allow them to proxy, only that they were allowed in this server. My post should’ve been edited to reflect this and I am very grateful for the correction!

One anon, no emoji to refer to them by so apologies if this gets confusing, asked if any posts had been deleted after Sakri reblogged/responded to our post. No one on our account has deleted anything, I am unsure where this is coming from but others have also stated this. If anything is disappearing I believe it is tumblr having issues with different people being logged into this account as we’ve had problems with saving and editing drafts in the past! We are not attempting to cover our tracks or force things out of context.

Short note here, but Sakri reblogged one of our team’s responses to an ask stating that the shtick is over. This account is not a gimmick or satire, it was created for myself and a group of friends to air our opinions on the ongoing Chococritters/Chocoperrito situation. I just wanted to clarify this🙂‍↕️

One of our team members stated that he does not agree with the term call-out. I fully agree with this point but at the time of writing could not come up with a better term, apologies for any confusion. I do not think it was appropriate to share this publicly when it could’ve been handled privately, but I will not delete it for sake of transparency.

🌩️-anon, came into our asks disagreeing with our usage of the term “futile drama” to describe the situation. I apologize with this and acknowledge that it was not an appropriate term. No matter what side you are on there is potential harm to a party in this situation, making it not futile. Many blogs being made to discuss the situation made it drama in my opinion, but I do not agree with the use of futile. Also, they claimed that we are comfortable posting our own criticism but not criticism coming our way, I have taken time out of my busy day to attempt to levelheadedly reply to every ask that comes our way (that is not either redundant and covered by another response or just telling us to kill/harm ourselves, obviously). If you believe your ask was ignored please resend it! I am purposefully skipping over the middle of this ask as I will attempt to properly cover it in my next long post, thank you for your patience.

The main reason I bothered making this post is the claim that because we were all CC members we knew Reki. This is completely untrue, and the response from the person who wrote this later backtracking it is in poor taste. I do not agree with this at all and I completely understand the criticism of us not knowing Reki personally. I have stated in a response to an ask that we know two individuals who have personally spoken to Reki, and one that was once good friends with her. This still in no way makes us close with Reki, or even constitutes saying we know her. I apologize for my fellow members actions. For the claims of parasocial, I do not like the idea that defending someone from allegations that have no substantial evidence makes us parasocial, merely trying to see the facts as they are presented, how little there truly is. What is said with no proof is not facts, it is opinion.

I hate that I have to even address this part in my post and it is genuinely embarrassing. As this post goes live I will have changed the password to this account and the email linked with it until I can consult with my team and have a serious discussion about what is appropriate to be posting. What you all are probably interested in, the satire responses to asks telling us to harm/kill ourselves. The responses are entirely unnecessary and completely inappropriate and something I asked not be responded to when I first made this account and shared it with my team. Satire or not, it is purely not funny. Telling someone to kill or seriously harm themselves is not funny, and playing into it is not appropriate for what this account was made for. I sincerely apologize for this, on my behalf but as well as on behalf of my team members posting these things.

Thank you all for your time if you read this all and I hope you are all doing well no matter what side of the drama you find yourself on, even if you’re a bystander and don’t care one way or another. I hope that going forward this account will take the more serious path I intended for it in the beginning.

This is mostly irrelevant to this post, but I must add it nonetheless. My second installment to the longer-form call-out (new term on the way hopefully, suggestions are welcome) posts will not come out as soon as I imagined as life always finds a way to make me very busy! I also don’t care to spend all day on the internet picking apart a controversy while people spam our asks being overly negative. I hope to get the second installment out by at the very latest Wednesday of next week, but things could change. Thank you all for your feedback, critical or supportive, I appreciate you all for your time.

-Dallas, the main account owner, deeply embarrassed, 🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Addressing Criticisms of Crittercisms

TW for mentions of threats of suicide and self harm (brief mentions)

As the title suggests, I will be addressing the common or main criticisms of this account. As Vic predicted, and I can say now that I saw coming, some of us on this account have different views on things from others. Going into this I believed that we agreed to keep this account ‘professional’ and purely based on our collective opinions on the Chococritters/Chocoperrito situation. Clearly, if you’ve seen any of the reblogs and posts from others on this account some of us do not share this sentiment. I do intend to make follow-up posts in succession with my current ‘series’ if you will of calling out hypocrisy and misconception between different blogs, not only Sakri.

I want to extend an apology on my behalf if my initial post caused any harm to Sakri and their blog, as well as it’s friends Earl, Vic, and Confidental-Critters. I did not mean to send any harassment their way, and believed that I made it very clear that this account is not to rally a witch-hunt in any way.

I was well aware upon the creation of this account that many get very defensive (on every side) when it comes to internet drama. This account has not sent any asks to another account to my knowledge, however I do not have control of that my team does. In the following paragraphs I want to clear up any misunderstandings or (despite accidental, still relevant) misinformation that has been shared.

Starting with, in my initial post I had stated that Sakri had claimed that Reki changed the rule allowing IRL’s and DA’s to proxy in CC. 🌸-anon corrected me stating that the rule was not changed to allow them to proxy, only that they were allowed in this server. My post should’ve been edited to reflect this and I am very grateful for the correction!

One anon, no emoji to refer to them by so apologies if this gets confusing, asked if any posts had been deleted after Sakri reblogged/responded to our post. No one on our account has deleted anything, I am unsure where this is coming from but others have also stated this. If anything is disappearing I believe it is tumblr having issues with different people being logged into this account as we’ve had problems with saving and editing drafts in the past! We are not attempting to cover our tracks or force things out of context.

Short note here, but Sakri reblogged one of our team’s responses to an ask stating that the shtick is over. This account is not a gimmick or satire, it was created for myself and a group of friends to air our opinions on the ongoing Chococritters/Chocoperrito situation. I just wanted to clarify this🙂‍↕️

One of our team members stated that he does not agree with the term call-out. I fully agree with this point but at the time of writing could not come up with a better term, apologies for any confusion. I do not think it was appropriate to share this publicly when it could’ve been handled privately, but I will not delete it for sake of transparency.

🌩️-anon, came into our asks disagreeing with our usage of the term “futile drama” to describe the situation. I apologize with this and acknowledge that it was not an appropriate term. No matter what side you are on there is potential harm to a party in this situation, making it not futile. Many blogs being made to discuss the situation made it drama in my opinion, but I do not agree with the use of futile. Also, they claimed that we are comfortable posting our own criticism but not criticism coming our way, I have taken time out of my busy day to attempt to levelheadedly reply to every ask that comes our way (that is not either redundant and covered by another response or just telling us to kill/harm ourselves, obviously). If you believe your ask was ignored please resend it! I am purposefully skipping over the middle of this ask as I will attempt to properly cover it in my next long post, thank you for your patience.

The main reason I bothered making this post is the claim that because we were all CC members we knew Reki. This is completely untrue, and the response from the person who wrote this later backtracking it is in poor taste. I do not agree with this at all and I completely understand the criticism of us not knowing Reki personally. I have stated in a response to an ask that we know two individuals who have personally spoken to Reki, and one that was once good friends with her. This still in no way makes us close with Reki, or even constitutes saying we know her. I apologize for my fellow members actions. For the claims of parasocial, I do not like the idea that defending someone from allegations that have no substantial evidence makes us parasocial, merely trying to see the facts as they are presented, how little there truly is. What is said with no proof is not facts, it is opinion.

I hate that I have to even address this part in my post and it is genuinely embarrassing. As this post goes live I will have changed the password to this account and the email linked with it until I can consult with my team and have a serious discussion about what is appropriate to be posting. What you all are probably interested in, the satire responses to asks telling us to harm/kill ourselves. The responses are entirely unnecessary and completely inappropriate and something I asked not be responded to when I first made this account and shared it with my team. Satire or not, it is purely not funny. Telling someone to kill or seriously harm themselves is not funny, and playing into it is not appropriate for what this account was made for. I sincerely apologize for this, on my behalf but as well as on behalf of my team members posting these things.

Thank you all for your time if you read this all and I hope you are all doing well no matter what side of the drama you find yourself on, even if you’re a bystander and don’t care one way or another. I hope that going forward this account will take the more serious path I intended for it in the beginning.

This is mostly irrelevant to this post, but I must add it nonetheless. My second installment to the longer-form call-out (new term on the way hopefully, suggestions are welcome) posts will not come out as soon as I imagined as life always finds a way to make me very busy! I also don’t care to spend all day on the internet picking apart a controversy while people spam our asks being overly negative. I hope to get the second installment out by at the very latest Wednesday of next week, but things could change. Thank you all for your feedback, critical or supportive, I appreciate you all for your time.

-Dallas, the main account owner, deeply embarrassed, 🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

"I knew Reki because I was in the server" is highkey diabolical, what levels of parasocial do you gotta be to see the server owner being friendly and popping into chats and come to the conclusion you know him well enough to make this blog brocacho, idk don't get me wrong I'm accusing you based on what I've seen but feel free to clear your name with an explanation </3

Yeah, sorry, I was doing something else while typing that and I honestly didn’t think through it- I have no parasocial relationship with reki, and this blog isn’t really meant to be about reki in specific, obviously the “situation” is about reki. That was a misspeak on my end, I rescind that statement. Oops. 💼🥹

[crittercisms]

“Never claimed in any post that any of us knew or know Reki personally.” literally two hours ago “I knew Reki.” on a post literally asking if any of yall actually knew Reki LMFAO

Apologies for my previous post. I had not seen the other one. I will be consulting with my team as I clearly do not agree with this statement, as yes we were long term members but we only have two friends who were mutuals with Reki (neither of whom are working on this blog).

-🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

just being in cc doesn’t NOOT equal knowing reki tf 😭😭😭 were you friends with reki? any dms? or u just got sum parasocial shit goin on?

Never claimed in any post that any of us knew or know Reki personally. Nothing parasocial, just making arguments against someone who is alleging horrible things on her while practically refusing to give evidence. Thank you for your time

-🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Have literally any of you ever at the bare minimum spoken to Reki? Like actually one on one? Because if not this blog genuinely just shouldn’t exist. You’re all speaking on topics you’re very clearly uneducated on because you WEREN’T THERE point blank period. If none of you actually knew Reki, maybe stop trying to speak on an important situation that you don’t really know about because it makes you seem parasocial as hell.

I knew Reki. We were like. In chococritters.

[crittercisms]

i find it absolutely hilarious how the only actual things you’ve posted so far have been wrong and you’ve had to delete them 😭 maybe leave it to the people who are actually interacting behind the scenes and know more than yall.

🤤🤤🤤Neither me nor dallas actually deleted anything I Fink dat was a tumblr error idk i didn’t delete it👜👜👜

[crittercisms]

im confused. So you're.. opinionated but people on your blog are making callout posts? And deleting other members of your blogs posts? Vic just posted that you reblogged pronouns post TWICE. But then deleted them both right after?? Would you guys end up putting those posts up again or are they staying deleted? I don't see them anywhere on your blog. - 🧠 anon

Nobody is deleting each others posts. We are friends. We hold hands and play. I don’t know. I hate this app.👜

[crittercisms]

I wouldn't call something thats genuinely harming others "drama"?????? thats srsly so fucking gross of u guys??

"oh! this person is airing out either their kink or regression to minors and people not consenting to be doing that? haha! thats just useless Internet Drama.

be SO fucking fr right now 😭😭😭😭

- 🌩️ (using a signoff in case i have more 2 say. if you cant handle your own criticism but are comfortable posting criticism of youre own i think u should delete this blog 💜 just a heads up)

What would you prefer if not drama. Love the purple heart.

[crittercisms]

is your pfp matpat because youre only coming up with theories and dont have solid proof

- 🧠 anon

Hi 🧠-anon! The pfp is Mat-pat as we as a collective thought it was funny and had no other ideas. As we have stated multiple times, and are getting tired of stating in every post, this account is purely opinionated. A chococritters-theory if you will.

-🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Not going to write lots for this as I have other things to attend to but my attention was directed to this reblog. You claim that we are calling out Sakri for having incorrect information ‘one time’ while criticizing us for “having incorrect information” while staying our opinions. It’s okay if your friend does it but not us? Especially when Sakri has a much larger audience than this account probably will ever have.

I do not agree at all with the point of keeping Sinnoh comfortable as Sakri later completely ruined this by making a call-out post on him. Who is Al Haitham to decide that Sinnoh no longer deserves to be comfortable? I personally made and ask on his page trying to inform him that he accidentally outed Sinnoh as his source by not censoring his tag properly and he stated that it was not the “gotcha I thought it was”. Later that day I believe, or the next day Sakri made his post calling out Sinnoh for withholding information, the same thing he is/was doing.

Stating that no one but Kaveh was doing tickets is completely untrue, as I have tickets open fairly regularly and never once had a ticket handled by him. This is disingenuous at best, manipulative at worst.

Finally, with the phrasing of “call-out post” I did not know how else to phrase it, but it was me, Dallas, who wrote the post about Sakri, not any of my colleagues (though they did review it). I will try to find a better synonym for my next post but please do not attack my team or call us hypocritical over simple grammar and wording. It’s stated in multiple posts that it is not a single person working on this blog.

To add to this as I want to prevent any further misconceptions: the team is NOT a system. We are seperate people who all live our own lives and live in different timezones aswell.

-Dallas, 🍋‍🟩

Part One of “Calling Out” Sakri, or Kaveh, former Chococritters staff.

Trigger warning for mentions of: grooming, pedophilia, age-play kink, pet-play kink, rape-play kink, and if you dislike opinions

Well it appears the account has been found by some of the biggest contributors of the Chococritters controversy! How unfortunate that Sakri found it upon himself to preemptively block this account when, as of writing this, nothing has been posted yet! It’s almost as if he knows that he has been spreading rumors and showing extreme bias to the point of spreading misinformation while presenting information about this situation.

In this post I will be making what I believe to be fair critique of how Sakri (collective, as we are unsure who is in front when this will be posted) has shared his insider information, and his opinions on CC/Reki.

Questionable Claims:

Starting in chronological order of Sakri timeline, we start with an ask of Anon defending Kaveh about his demotion. Anon mentions Kaveh allegedly badmouthing CC tickets in vc. [Sidenote: At this point in his blog he is using sign off emojis instead of graphics, I cannot find the key to this system on his page anymore. For this posts sake I will be referring to the collective name, Sakri. This is not meant to be disrespectful.] Sakri denys this claim, and rebuts its by stating that he was made to handle two tickets covering grooming and pedophilia on his third-or-fourth day of being a trial. I do not doubt the nature of the tickets themselves, however I doubt that Reki forced Kaveh to take these tickets either, and had Kaveh spoken up about being uncomfortable with handling these tickets, another staff would be assigned to handle them. This is supported in a later post, stating, “I will give Reki the smallest, and I mean smallest amount of credit. He did not force those tickets onto us.”

Withholding of Evidence:

The first post showing voluntary withholding of evidence is very soon in the timeline. Anon asks if Sakri has any information on the allegations against Reki, the owner of CC. The mentioned allegations being: ageplay, petplay, and rapeplay. Sakri stated that the short answer is yes, he does have screenshots, video recordings, and more to back up these allegations. However, he cannot share them as he was sworn to secrecy by his source. This will be touched on later when his source is revealed. Despite supposedly having all of the evidence necessary to prove these disgusting allegations against Reki, he refuses to post them. For someone so dedicated to the truth and uncaring of others reputations, you think he would be more than willing to share the so-called concrete evidence he has.

Questionable Claims 2.0

🍹-Anon asks if Sakri has any evidence either way of Reki’s partner, Kai, being truly inactive in the server. Sakri responds saying that is the only truthful statement in all of Reki’s response. This is odd as he is incredibly defensive about his own statements being misconceived and invalidated, yet in this statement completely invalidates Reki’s traumas and the undeniable proofs brought up in his statement.

Silencing or Attacking of Others

Skipping over a few posts that will either be referenced later or irrelevant, this post is not originally from Sakri, but reblogged from his friends tumblr: Confidential-Critters. I’m this post Anon states that Kaveh was only a trail for two weeks; may not be exactly 14 days but roughly true. All he did was post a hoyoverse character of the day: from an outsider view this could be true but it does seem more likely that he was doing more behind the scenes such as tickets instead of monitoring chat, and finally, that nothing changed when Kaveh was demoted: undeniably, from a wide server perspective, true. Confidential-Critters, instead of being even slightly professional, or merely not entertaining Anon, responds with a meme. This is a perfect example of how seriously Sakri and his friends take this situation, especially when it involves such serious allegations. Sakri reblogs with his own meme underneath.

Withholding of Information 2.0

In this post Anon points out that Al Haitham’s claim of Reki and Kai talking behind the scenes is not true as Kai lives in a costal Australian town and does not have frequent access to the internet. More points on this topic get brought up later but in the context of this post (and the fact it is still up as of writing this), this is what Al Haitham stands by. [Sidenote, this is where posts now have a signoff graphic stating who is speaking. I will now be referring to whoever is speaking in each post by name and hopefully the correct pronouns. Feel free to send an ask if I get a name or pronouns wrong on any post!] Al Haitham states again that he has insider information from an unknown source about Reki and his partner, Kai. He states that he knows for 100% certain that they are in contact. Al Haitham also makes a point that Anon is trying to “throw us off”, this is unclear what its referring to but oddly accusatory as Anon was very respectful and seemed to be attempting to reduce any misinformation spread to the best of Anon’s ability.

Reki attempting to bring Kaveh back to the staff team (allegedly)

In this post, Anon asks for proof of Reki attempting to bring Kaveh back onto the staff team. In a rare case of Al Haitham actually providing contextual, on topic, screenshots, he prevails. Though many are censored/blurred due to “personal information”. Al Haitham however states the actual screenshot of Reki confirming that she wanted to coax Kaveh back into staff is again sworn to secrecy. Al Haitham states that the server rules for Chococritters were changed after Kaveh’s demotion to allow IRLS and DA’s to use puralkit after learning of Kaveh’s delusional attachment. Previously, the rules only allowed DID/OSDD systems to use proxies. Al Haitham claims that Reki took a whole 11 days to reply to his dm, alleging that she only reached out after the majority of her staff team stepped down. Al Haitham follows the screenshots up with a series of questions, while still not proving his original claim of Reki wanting him back as a server moderator.

This is a part one to a series of posts that will be released to “call out” Sakri for his insincerity. These will be posted in order of going down his timeline.

Footnotes:

Apologies for the breaking up into parts, I am writing this on mobile as my laptop is out of commission and there is an image limit of 10. I do not want to leave out any evidence for the purpose of being entirely transparent. These posts should be posted in parts, some may come out sooner than others based on information and the time I have to write them. I do have a life outside of this drama.

This blog is not targeted only toward Sakri or Kaveh, but as he took it upon himself to block out account before we went public he incriminated himself further. There will be other posts, not only from me either, focusing on others who have spoken about the Chococritters/Chocoperrito controversy.

All of the people mentioned have made themselves public figures by choosing to make their own blogs or in any way publicly speak about the situation. This is not intended to harass, encourage others to harass, or defame anyone.

Any feedback, criticism, correction, or discussion of this post should be directed to our asks.

-Dallas🍋‍🟩

[crittercisms]

Apologies for this! I’ll fix it! Thank you Flower Anon🙂‍↕️

-🍋‍🟩

Apologies, but you are incorrect for the rule about allowing irls/da’s to use proxy bots. Currently as of right now only systems are allowed to use them, the rule that was changed was allowing people with da’s and irls to be in the server.

-🌸 (incase I send more asks)

Sowwy 💼