Text
the adhd feeling of being unable to stop reading books as a kid, sneaking books into class, hiding books in your textbook, keeping a second copy of the same book for when the teacher inevitably confiscated the first one. Books falling out of your bag, books hidden in your hoodie pocket, books dribbling out of your eyeballs and taking over your daydreams. Just. The absolute dopamine fueled obsession of reading as an adhd kid. So. Many. Books.
and 10 years later, being completely utterly distraught and distractedly… unable to focus on a goddamn book
20K notes
·
View notes
Photo
I’ve personally always been of the opinion that voting for a candidate sort of gives you MORE right to be critical of them

59K notes
·
View notes
Text
I think one good reason to not overly focus on some imagined inherent moral goodness of people who have been horribly oppressed throughout history, and it's better to focus on the fact that the violent oppression of any people is inherently horrifying and worth fighting against, is that it leaves you incapable of properly assessing why, for example, the Spanish colonization of Mesoamerica was a crime against humanity. For all intents and purposes the Aztec state was itself a major regional oppressor, and its practice of raiding other neighboring peoples to obtain victims for human sacrifice earned it the hatred of practically every other indigenous group in the region, to the point that when the Spanish laid siege to Tenochtitlan the vast majority of its army consisted of indigenous people who they easily recruited due to their collective grievances against the Aztec Empire. None of this changes the fact that what the Spanish went on to do, the systematic annihilation and subjugation of every culture in the region, Aztec civilization included, is among some of the worst crimes against humanity in history. The Aztecs don't need to be good or moral or anything like that for us to understand that what was done to the people of Mesoamerica by Spain was utterly monstrous and has had horrible consequences for the indigenous people of Mexico up to this day.
15K notes
·
View notes
Text
a child with an undiagnosed mental illness: I think I need help. I struggle with things nobody else seems to be struggling with.
a parent who never got diagnosed for the exact same mental illness: Oh sweetie. EVERYONE struggles with that :)
166K notes
·
View notes
Text
When I get this way it can be a struggle to not get into a pattern of self-hatred because why can’t I just DO something??
I feel like adhd bored is different than neurotypical bored because like. You don’t understand. I have a billion things I could be doing. I turn on the tv. I stare at the Netflix screen for five minutes. Flip through shows and movies for the next thirty minutes. Nothing looks good. I put in a video game. Play for two minutes. Not feeling it. I load up YouTube. Watch half a video before closing the app. Maybe I’ll read a book? I stare at my giant bookshelf. The thought of starting a new book seems too hard. I lay in bed and play phone games for six hours. Nothing has gotten done. Still bored.
86K notes
·
View notes
Text
Only one thing y’all can take from trans women. Notes.
99K notes
·
View notes
Text
Recently came to the realisation that my sexuality isn’t gay or straight, its bottom.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
More PJO reboot promo plans? Here we go.
“I didn’t want to be a halfblood.” Short shots of Percy, his eyes, back of his head, hands fidgeting nervously with a pen, his mouth.
“Being a halfblood is dangerous.” Shot of him uncapping the pen, Anaklusmos glowing and a faint noise in the background like a whine.
“It’s scary.” Shot widens to show Percy, clothes tattered, covered in soot and sweat, chest heaving, obviously scared but trying to hide it.
“My name is Percy Jackson.” Like a film rewinding, we see glimpses of Percy’s life - feet buried in the sand in front of raging waves, bags of blue candy, images of Sally, and interspersed between it all, hands and feet fidgeting.
“I’m twelve years old, and until a few months ago, I was just like you.” The music starts to pick up or fade in, the tempo rising. We see shots of New York City, school buses, a hand trying to complete a homework assignment.
“Don’t say I didn’t warn you.” We cut back to Percy, still dirty, holding his sword, and in a battle stance. In his hand, Anaklusmos bounces up and down just a bit to the beat of the song. There is a sound in the background like heavy breathing, wet and cloying.
The camera pans around Percy, who smiles just a little at us, a glint in his eye. The beat drops, the camera backs off and we watch him raise his sword as an unseen beast roars loudly enough to drown out the music and send a blast of air over Percy.
Percy takes a step and leaps into the air, Anaklusmos held high, and the scene shifts to slow motion. We watch Percy sail through the air, face distorted with a battle cry, and as his sword passes over the screen, the title shows in its wake.
1 note
·
View note
Text
The new Percy Jackson promos should be a slow pan through of the oracle’s attic -show all the weird jars of body parts, old weapons, mementos and hard won prizes covered in dust and cobwebs. Either deathly silent, or with slow greek music, or quiet hissing like a snake. Really focus on all the heroes that fought quests and died- before getting to the light filtering in through the dirty window at the end, just illuminating the mummified oracle who turns around on the stool and says “What is YOUR destiny, halfblood?”
34 notes
·
View notes
Photo


the moon sets behind the temple of Poseidon at Sounion
42K notes
·
View notes
Photo
from my limited research, it seems fair to say that there were ancient Greek men who had sex with younger men, sometimes even teenagers. It wasn’t considered “taboo” for them, instead it was a way of life and simply how their society functioned. Older men took younger men under their wing, so to speak, to educate them about society. This often, but not always, included sexual activity. I’ve included a link that covers this topic in much more well informed detail.
https://stmuhistorymedia.org/ancient-greek-pederasty-education-or-exploitation/
However, just because it was acceptable then does not mean it is acceptable now. Ancient Greeks had very different views of sexuality and society than we modern people do. If a teacher at a high school has a sexual relationship with a student, it is frowned upon and they WILL lose their job.
Viewing ancient practices through a modern lens will always have this affect. No, the ancient Greeks were not sexualizing children. Yes, they did sometimes engage in activity that in modern times would be classified as “pedophilia.”
Giving full credit to @prismatic-bell , whose posts I very much enjoy for a variety of reasons (one being that they post a lot about Jewish culture, religion, etc., which I do not have any first hand experience with), it seems the term “my dudes, my fellows, my lads, don’t be fucking pedophiles” can very clearly be interpreted as “please do not have sex with younger boys incapable of consent.”
tldr; yes, there is proof the ancient greeks were having sex with boys younger than them. Yes, today that would be called pedophilia. pretty sure op wasn’t shitting on the ancient greeks, but was rather using a well known historical fact as an example.
I can’t comment on how valid this interpretation of the Torah is but while the 6th century BCE Greeks obviously had erotic mentorships beween male adolescents and adult men, they were
a) not involving prepubescent boys
b) not intended to be about sex in exchange for gifts (though this certainly did happen too) but about companionship and the sex was actually part of the education
c) pedophilia = primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children ancient Greek men = attracted to pubescent adolescents and adult women (obviously other sexualities existed as well, there were gays, asexuals etc but you know what I mean)
You can read the complete post and thread here, I just singled out the part I wanted to comment on. I mean… way to go complaining about the cultural context of the Torah being misunderstood but shitting on ancient Greek culture by equating one of their cultural concepts with pedophilia.
131 notes
·
View notes
Note
Re: the post you reblogged about Bush. I'm 21 and tbh feel like I can only vote for Bernie, can you explain if/why I shouldn't? Thanks and sorry if this is dumb or anything.
Oh boy. Okay, I’ll do my best here. Note that a) this will get long, and b) I’m old, Tired, and I‘m pretty sure my brain tried to kill me last night. Since by nature I am sure I will say something Controversial ™, if anyone reads this and feels a deep urge to inform me that I am Wrong, just… mark it down as me being Wrong and move on with your life. But also, really, you should read this and hopefully think about it. Because while I’m glad you asked this question, it feels like there’s a lot in your cohort who won’t, and that worries me. A lot.
First, not to sound utterly old-woman-in-a-rocking-chair ancient, people who came of age/are only old enough to have Obama be the first president that they really remember have no idea how good they had it. The world was falling the fuck apart in 2008 (not coincidentally, after 8 years of Bush). We came within a flicker of the permanent collapse of the global economy. The War on Terror was in full roar, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were at their height, we had Dick Cheney as the cartoon supervillain before we had any of Trump’s cohort, and this was before Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden had exposed the extent of NSA/CIA intelligence-gathering/American excesses or there was any kind of public debate around the fact that we were all surveilled all the time. And the fact that a brown guy named Barack Hussein Obama was elected in this climate seems, and still seems tbh, kind of amazing. And Obama was certainly not a Perfect President ™. He had to scale back a lot of planned initiatives, he is notorious for expanding the drone strike/extrajudicial assassination program, he still subscribed to the overall principles of neoliberalism and American exceptionalism, etc etc. There is valid criticism to be made as to how the hopey-changey optimistic rhetoric stacked up against the hard realities of political office. And yet…. at this point, given what we’re seeing from the White House on a daily basis, the depth of the parallel universe/double standards is absurd.
Because here’s the thing. Obama, his entire family, and his entire administration had to be personally/ethically flawless the whole time (and they managed that – not one scandal or arrest in eight years, against the legions of Trumpistas now being convicted) because of the absolute frothing depths of Republican hatred, racial conspiracy theories, and obstruction against him. (Remember Merrick Garland and how Mitch McConnell got away with that, and now we have Gorsuch and Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court? Because I remember that). If Obama had pulled one-tenth of the shit, one-twentieth of the shit that the Trump administration does every day, he would be gone. It also meant that people who only remember Obama think he was typical for an American president, and he wasn’t. Since about… Jimmy Carter, and definitely since Ronald Reagan, the American people have gone for the Trump model a lot more than the Obama model. Whatever your opinion on his politics or character, Obama was a constitutional law professor, a community activist, a neighborhood organizer and brilliant Ivy League intellectual who used to randomly lie awake at night thinking about income inequality. Americans don’t value intellectualism in their politicians; they just don’t. They don’t like thinking that “the elites” are smarter than them. They like the folksy populist who seems fun to have a beer with, and Reagan/Bush Senior/Clinton/Bush Junior sold this persona as hard as they possibly could. As noted in said post, Bush Junior (or Shrub as the late, great Molly Ivins memorably dubbed him) was Trump Lite but from a long-established political family who could operate like an outwardly civilized human.
The point is: when you think Obama was relatively normal (which, again, he wasn’t, for any number of reasons) and not the outlier in a much larger pattern of catastrophic damage that has been accelerated since, again, the 1980s (oh Ronnie Raygun, how you lastingly fucked us!), you miss the overall context in which this, and which Trump, happened. Like most left-wingers, I don’t agree with Obama’s recent and baffling decision to insert himself into the 2020 race and warn the Democratic candidates against being too progressive or whatever he was on about. I think he was giving into the same fear that appears to be motivating the remaining chunk of Joe Biden’s support: that middle/working-class white America won’t go for anything too wild or that might sniff of Socialism, and that Uncle Joe, recalled fondly as said folksy populist and the internet’s favorite meme grandfather from his time as VP, could pick up the votes that went to Trump last time. And that by nature, no one else can.
The underlying belief is that these white voters just can’t support anything too “un-American,” and that by pushing too hard left, Democratic candidates risk handing Trump a second term. Again: I don’t agree and I think he was mistaken in saying it. But I also can’t say that Obama of all people doesn’t know exactly the strength of the political machine operating against the Democratic Party and the progressive agenda as a whole, because he ran headfirst into it for eight years. The fact that he managed to pass any of his legislative agenda, usually before the Tea Party became a thing in 2010, is because Democrats controlled the House and Senate for the first two years of his first term. He was not perfect, but it was clear that he really did care (just look up the pictures of him with kids). He installed smart, efficient, and scandal-free people to do jobs they were qualified for. He gave us Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to join RBG on the Supreme Court. All of this seems… like a dream.
That said: here we are in a place where Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren are the front-runners for the Democratic nomination (and apparently Pete Buttigieg is getting some airplay as a dark horse candidate, which… whatever). The appeal of Biden is discussed above, and he sure as hell is not my favored candidate (frankly, I wish he’d just quit). But Sanders and Warren are 85% - 95% similar in their policy platforms. The fact that Michael “50 Billion Dollar Fortune” Bloomberg started rattling his chains about running for president is because either a Sanders or Warren presidency terrifies the outrageously exploitative billionaire capitalist oligarchy that runs this country and has been allowed to proceed essentially however the fuck they like since… you guessed it, the 1980s, the era of voodoo economics, deregulation, and the free market above all. Warren just happens to be ten years younger than Sanders and female, and Sanders’ age is not insignificant. He’s 80 years old and just had a heart attack, and there’s still a year to go to the election. It’s also more than a little eye-rolling to describe him as the only progressive candidate in the race, when he’s an old white man (however much we like and approve of his policy positions). And here’s the thing, which I think is a big part of the reason why this polarized ideological purity internet leftist culture mistrusts Warren:
She may have changed her mind on things in the past.
Scary, right? I sound like I’m being facetious, but I’m not. An argument I had to read with my own two eyes on this godforsaken hellsite was that since Warren became a Democrat around the time Clinton signed Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, she sekritly hated gay people and might still be a corporate sellout, so on and etcetera. (And don’t even get me STARTED on the fact that DADT, coming a few years after the height of the AIDS crisis where it was considered God’s Judgment of the Icky Gays, was the best Clinton could realistically hope to achieve, but this smacks of White Gay Syndrome anyway and that is a whole other kettle of fish.) Bernie has always demonstrably been a democratic socialist, and: good for him. I’m serious. But because there’s the chance that Warren might not have thought exactly as she does now at any point in her life, the hysterical and paranoid left-wing elements don’t trust that she might not still secretly do so. (Zomgz!) It’s the same element that’s feeding cancel culture and “wokeness.” Nobody can be allowed to have shifted or grown in their opinions or, like a functional, thoughtful, non-insane adult, changed their beliefs when presented with compelling evidence to the contrary. To the ideological hordes, any hint of uncertainty or past failure to completely toe the line is tantamount to heresy. Any evidence of any other belief except The Correct One means that this person is functionally as bad as Trump. And frankly, it’s only the Sanders supporters who, just as in 2016, are threatening to withhold their vote in the general election if their preferred candidate doesn’t win the primary, and indeed seem weirdly proud about it.
OK, boomer Bernie or Buster.
Here’s the thing, the thing, the thing: there is never going to be an American president free of the deeply toxic elements of American ideology. There just won’t be. This country has been built how it has for 250 years, and it’s not gonna change. You are never going to have, at least not in the current system, some dream candidate who gets up there and parrots the left-wing talking points and attacks American imperialism, exceptionalism, ravaging global capitalism, military and oil addiction, etc. They want to be elected as leader of a country that has deeply internalized and taken these things to heart for its entire existence, and most of them believe it to some degree themselves. So this groupthink white liberal mentality where the only acceptable candidate is this Perfect Non-Problematic robot who has only ever had one belief their entire lives and has never ever wavered in their devotion to doctrine has really gotten bad. The Democratic Party would be considered… maybe center/mild left in most other developed countries. It’s not even really left-wing by general standards, and Sanders and Warren are the only two candidates for the nomination who are even willing to go there and explicitly put out policy proposals that challenge the systematic structure of power, oppression, and exploitation of the late-stage capitalist 21st century. Warren has the billionaires fussed, and instead of backing down, she’s doubling down. That’s part of why they’re so scared of her. (And also misogyny, because the world is depressing like that.) She is going head-on after picking a fight with some of the worst people on the planet, who are actively killing the rest of us, and I don’t know about you, but I like that.
Of course: none of this will mean squat if she (or the eventual Democratic winner, who I will vote for regardless of who it is, but as you can probably tell, she’s my ride or die) don’t a) win the White House and then do as they promised on the campaign trail, and b) don’t have a Democratic House and Senate willing to have a backbone and pass the laws. Even Nancy Pelosi, much as she’s otherwise a badass, held off on opening a formal impeachment inquiry into Trump for months out of fear it would benefit him, until the Ukraine thing fell into everyone’s laps. The Democrats are really horrible at sticking together and voting the party line the way Republicans do consistently, because Democrats are big-tent people who like to think of themselves as accepting and tolerant of other views and unwilling to force their members’ hands. The Republicans have no such qualms (and indeed, judging by their enabling of Trump, have no qualms at all).
The modern American Republican party has become a vehicle for no-holds-barred power for rich white men at the expense of absolutely everything and everyone else, and if your rationale is that you can’t vote for the person opposing Donald Goddamn Trump is that you’re just not vibing with them on the language of that one policy proposal… well, I’m glad that you, White Middle Class Liberal, feel relatively safe that the consequences of that decision won’t affect you personally. Even if we’re due to be out of the Paris Climate Accords one day after the 2020 election, and the issue of climate change now has the most visibility it’s ever had after years of big-business, Republican-led efforts to deny and discredit the science, hey, Secret Corporate Shill, am I right? Can’t trust ‘er. Let’s go have a craft beer.
As has been said before: vote as far left as you want in the primary. Vote your ideology, vote whatever candidate you want, because the only way to make actual, real-world change is to do that. The huge, embedded, all-consuming and horrible system in which we operate is not just going to suddenly be run by fairy dust and happy thoughts overnight. Select candidates that reflect your values exactly, be as picky and ideologically militant as you want. That’s the time to do that! Then when it comes to the general election:
America is a two-party system. It sucks, but that’s the case. Third-party votes, or refraining from voting because “it doesn’t matter” are functionally useless at best and actively harmful at worst.
Either the Democratic candidate or Donald Trump will win the 2020 election.
There is absolutely no length that the Republican/GOP machine, and its malevolent allies elsewhere, will not go to in order to secure a Trump victory. None.
Any talk whatsoever about “progressive values” or any kind of liberal activism, coupled with a course of action that increases the possibility of a Trump victory, is hypocritical at best and actively malicious at worst.
This is why I found the Democratic response to Obama’s “don’t go too wild” comments interesting. Bernie doubled down on the fact that his plans have widespread public support, and he’s right. (Frankly, the fact that Sanders and Warren are polling at the top, and the fact that they’re politicians and would not be crafting these campaign messages if they didn’t know that they were being positively received, says plenty on its own). Warren cleverly highlighted and praised Obama’s accomplishments in office (i.e. the Affordable Care Act) and didn’t say squat about whether she agreed or disagreed with him, then went right back to campaigning about why billionaires suck. And some guy named Julian Castro basically blew Obama off and claimed that “any Democrat” could beat Trump in 2020, just by nature of existing and being non-insane.
This is very dangerous! Do not be Julian Castro!
As I said in my tags on the Bush post: everyone assumed that sensible people would vote for Kerry in 2004. Guess what happened? Yeah, he got Swift Boated. The race between Obama and McCain in 2008, even after those said nightmare years of Bush, was very close until the global crash broke it open in Obama’s favor, and Sarah Palin was an actual disqualifier for a politician being brazenly incompetent and unprepared. (Then again, she was a woman from a remote backwater state, not a billionaire businessman.) In 2012, we thought Corporate MormonBot Mitt Fuggin’ Romney was somehow the worst and most dangerous candidate the Republicans could offer. In 2016, up until Election Day itself, everyone assumed that HRC was a badly flawed candidate but would win anyway. And… we saw how that worked out. Complacency is literally deadly.
I was born when Reagan was still president. I’m just old enough to remember the efforts to impeach Clinton over forcing an intern to give him a BJ in the Oval Office (This led by the same Republicans making Donald Trump into a darling of the evangelical Christian right wing.) I’m definitely old enough to remember 9/11 and how America lost its mind after that, and I remember the Bush years. And, obviously, the contrast with Obama, the swing back toward Trump, and everything that has happened since. We can’t afford to do this again. We’re hanging by a thread as it is, and not just America, but the entire planet.
So yes. By all means, vote for Sanders in the primary. Then when November 3, 2020 rolls around, if you care about literally any of this at all, hold your nose if necessary and vote straight-ticket Democrat, from the president, to the House and Senate, to the state and local offices. I cannot put it more strongly than that.
20K notes
·
View notes
Text
*coven going down, friends in danger, gotta reclaim hell, literally the apocalypse about to happen again*
sabrina:

5K notes
·
View notes
Photo
Oh this is so beautiful. Oh wow I want to wear one of these (or all of them) for the rest of my life. Screw being able to run and jump and climb just let me be a graceful gliding slip of a thing in silk and lace
Details in Blue
Infanta Isabel de Bourbon, 1866, by Vicente Palmaroli y Gonzalez.
Madame Charles Simon Favart, 1757, by François-Hubert Drouais.
Marie-Thérèse de Savoie, 1775, by Jean-Baptiste André Gautier-Dagoty.
Princesse de Broglie, 1853, by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres.
Admiring the Gift, by Pio Ricci.
Portrait de Philomena Lynch, 1900’s, by Paul Jobert.
Marie-Antoinette with the Rose, 1783, by Louise Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun.
Anne Streatfeild, 1756, by Arthur Devis.
María Isabel Álvarez y Montes, 1868, by Federico Madrazo.
Portrait of Amalia de Llano, 1853, by Federico de Madrazo y Kuntz.
16K notes
·
View notes
Text
I have ADHD and INTERNET ACCESS why would I fuckin REMEMBER things
28K notes
·
View notes