darknessofbnha

[darknessofbnha]

I'm sorry but if you in anyway contributed to this whole Rachel Zegler drama calling her smug, arrogant, ungrateful etc. you're not a girls girl. barbie did nothing for you. calling her antifeminist doesn't make you any more of a feminist.

"Let girls want marriage and feminine things!!" Sure if we're talking about wearing make up or getting Starbucks or screaming over our favorite boy bands.

I'm gonna speak about this from an American angle because that's my lived experience. And Disney's Snow White remake will likely cater to a mostly American audience. But are we not currently going through some of the most rigorous anti-woman legislation at the moment? The conservatives here are trying so hard to pass stricter abortion laws, getting rid of no fault divorce, banning contraceptives and birth control, anti-trans legislation for children AND adults. Straight men and the epidemic of podcasts they have are constantly pushing for a "high value" woman. They want us to get married and have babies.

Being a feminine woman and getting married is still the expectation for woman. I really don't care if someone gets married or not. But Rachel Zegler critiquing the prince narrative in 1937 Snow White is not controversial enough to crumble any feminist theory. Certainly not enough for all this discourse around her.

You just bought into the current racist, misogynist, anti-union propaganda.

[darknessofbnha]

The hate against Rachel Zegler is honestly the grossest thing ever and if at this point you're doing anything to contribute it don't dare call yourself a feminist. At this rate, she could have said she dreams of burning Snow White at a stake every night and driving thorns in her eyes and it still wouldn't justify the shit she's getting.

A reminder, it's way more anti-feminist to attack a woman; a woman who did nothing but say they're going to explore a different angle for an old character, in the name of a fictional character/gender roles, than it is to say "we want to give Snow White a plot other than romance." The fact that has to be said is ludicrous.

[darknessofbnha]

People about Harrison Ford: "but Harrison Ford began hating his character and the Star Wars movies because it was overshadowing his other projects. That's a different story altogether. He has the right to do it."

People about Rachel Zegler: "even if she hates the character she plays, she shouldn't say it out loud because it's just so disrespectful to the og movie, to its legacy, to the ppl who worked on it and to other actors who would've gladly taken her place to play the character" 💀

By that logic, isn't Ford also disrespectful to his character and the movies' legacy and hard work put into it and to other actors who would've gladly taken his place? It doesn't really matter what the reason to hate is. You're openly trashing on a movie/character so it's still disrespectful. (Me personally, I don't care cuz ppl are allowed to have their opinions, likes, and dislikes)

And btw, I never got the impression that Rachel hates the character she's playing, that she hates the og movie or that she's trashing it. She said she was scared by it when she was a kid and that some parts are outdated so >Disney< wrote them differently to better fit our age's morals and views on things. She's said so much more positive stuff about the movie and how grateful she is to be a part of it and you'd have seen it if you actually watched the whole length of her interviews and not just snippets that were turned into bad takes. And mind you, it was all from a year ago. People's views change constantly, day by day, and one year is a very long time. For all you know, she might have changed and embraced different views on things, especially after Barbie, so there's no need to dig into a one year old bad takes and take most of them SO out of context that she's now considered a "smug, arrogant, spoiled, ugly, narcissistic c*nt". I don't think people are aware of the actual meaning of the word narcissist, and idk why they're throwing it around so easily but I'm honestly not surprised.

What baffles me the most is that grown adults are judging a couple of bad takes made by a 21 year old, young inexperienced actress that was thrust into this harsh industry at the age of 17 and probably couldn't get the proper media training and is still finding the way to articulate herself better in order to not offend the oh so sensitive public who are sending her death threats over a kids fairy tale that has had TONS of remakes, many of them being "girlbossyfied" (or whatever is the word) yet nobody complains about them. But that's a whole other topic.

You wanna judge someone's opinion/views on things? Sure. You have the right. You wanna give them constructive criticism so they can learn something and try another approach? Of course! That's very helpful. But constructive criticism is CIVIL. Hell, it's even devoid of curse words because it's meant to kindly educate. At this point, ppl aren't criticizing but bullying and it needs to stop.

Harrison Ford: Han Solo is a piece of sh*t and I hate playing him. I hope they decapitate him to be honest

The Internet: WOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Rachel Zegler: I was scared of the 1937 Snow white when I was a child The Internet:

[darknessofbnha]

The amount of comments I've seen along the lines of "why doesn't Rachel just make her own brand new role instead of taking this one and changing the entire story and making it into something different" is just???? like genuinely baffling to me. Without even getting into whether or not Rachel likes Snow White or is grateful for the role, or even whether the changes (as we understand them so far, without even a trailer at this point) are good or bad, when did we start assuming actors had that much say in the writing? I mean, think about this for two seconds. Rachel was cast in this movie before her debut film had even come out. As of this moment, only two of her projects have been released. She's 22 years old. She was cast in West Side Story straight out of high school without the help of nepotism or whatever else. She isn't writing her own movies. She isn't a producer. She doesn't have creative control here. There is no chance she is in a position of that much power here. You can hate the changes. You can hate the answers she's given in interviews. But to act as if she is solely responsible for whatever the new Snow White movie is going to be is completely ridiculous and at that point, I'm just not inclined to give much weight to whatever you're saying about it because all I can see is that you don't really know what you're talking about.

[darknessofbnha]

I don't know how this person lives with the embarrassment after saying something so dumb 💀💀 "his claim of being abused is bs because he surely had a lavish life" oh my gooooods!!!!

Your response to that was absolutely brilliant 👌

C'mon, you know very well that Johnny Depp's claim of having an oppressive childhood is bullshit, especially when you consider that baby boomers, particularly white boomers, had relatively lavish lifestyles when they were children. I mean, Levittowns were a thing in post-World War II America.

“Lavish lifestyle”

Despite while in mentioning his childhood several times (including his sister, Christi) that his family were homeless several different times and moved place to place not being stable because of one reason or another.

Also 70s-80s America (which is the time JD grew up in) was not lavish in any sense of the world. You literally are talking about the 50s-60s era, which isn’t correct in the sense.

If you literally knew anything about the actually time period in which JD grew up in, you would know that this was a time of mass inflation because people were moving to cities. The small town living was gone by this era, because the jobs were in the cities.

But even then, let’s just say you’re right that JD grew up in lavish privileged household, just because someone came from “privilege”, that doesn’t mean they were not abused. You can ask Amber Heard that. You literally sound like every parent who abused their child and find nothing wrong for what they did, because they “feed, clothed, and sheltered” their children.

Also, the Boomer generation is super fucked up because of coporal parenting.

Like what the actual fuck are you even taking about.

[darknessofbnha]

Idk if I should laugh or cry...

What does the arab in your carrd mean? Is it like afab and amab?

.. i’m palestinian

[darknessofbnha]

i watched a tiktok of a guy saying that johnny depp fan girls have the same vibes as ted bundy girls. everything regarding this case is so sexist; johnny being dismissed because he's a man and if you support johnny depp then you're a crazy fangirl who hates women, but also amber using her womanhood to play into the victim mentality and her supporters saying if you don't support her you don't actually support victims. ambers entire case revolves around being a woman, she's victimizing herself and the media is eating it up. not one supporter of hers can acknowledge she did something wrong because "he's an older rich man so he had all the power" or "ambers abuse was reactive" or, my personal favourite, "hitting isn't abusive." it's such a twisted way of looking at it and so degrading to domestic abuse victims, especially men. this belief that you can't get abused if you're physically bigger, richer, or older is so fucked and silences people instead of uplifting them. it's support victims until it's not the ideal victim. i'm not saying this with the belief that johnny didn't do anything wrong, there was mutual abuse, it's the erasing the abuse amber inflicted onto him that pisses me off. i don't believe, given the evidence that was provided in court, that johnny physically abused amber. do i think he psychologically abused her? absolutely. do i think that's a terrible and traumatic thing to experience? absolutely. i have been in that position, and it's so horrible and i hope she gets the help she needs, however johnny should be granted the same. nobody won in this case. amber fans can't seem to comprehend that. they are making amber out to be this angel who never did anything wrong because she couldn't admit to doing anything wrong. they say we need to support women but then one of them tells me it would be my fault that if this happens to me nobody would believe me. so where is the line drawn? is it support all victims or believe all women? because some of them seem to really fucking confused and particularly biased.

[darknessofbnha]

This isn't defending JHo. She is racist. But labeling someone she associates with a racist is shortsighted, or just plain stupid. You literally have no idea what conversations are happening behind closed doors. He could be trying to educate her.

And here we have a bunch of people who don't even know the guy throwing tantrums and demanding explanations. Like, literally, he doesn't know ANY of us. And not a one of us is entitled to anything from him. You all need some counseling, seriously. None of this is healthy for anyone. You have no real coping skills for any real world problems. And that is why the older fans don't take you teenage fans seriously. We have REAL lives, with careers, and bills, and babies to worry to worry about. You want justice? Focus on the damn people around you! THAT you do have control over. Start there!

[darknessofbnha]

SOMEONE WITH A BRAIN, LADIES AND GENTS👌🔥✨

Okay, Amber Heard is not a great person, but what do you have to say about Johnny Depp being chummy with Roman Polanski and Harvey Weinstein? Not only that, but Depp was the one writing the article for Harvey for TIME's Person of the Year. And Weinstein played a role in the negative coverage of Michael Jackson.

are you a clown: yes or no? Johnny Depp questioned the allegations and motives behind Polanski’s case along with hundreds of other celebrities in Hollywood 12, going on 13 years ago. he wrote an article commenting on Weinstein’s success in 2012, 8 years before Weinstein was even convicted of anything at all. Also, Depp wasn’t friends with either of these people. Proof? Questioning allegations and the authenticity of them doesn’t make Depp a friend of anyone. If you were sitting here coughing up proof that Depp was out here going to bat for Weinstein in 2019-2020, I would be more inclined to at least take your comments seriously.

“And Weinstein played a role in the negative coverage of Michael Jackson” why are you telling me this as if I don’t already know that? What I should be asking you is why are you attempting to dig up dirt from a decade or longer ago against an innocent man who was falsely accused and that a court of law ruled was falsely accused? Youre like “oh well amber isn’t great” but then proceed to try and claim Johnny Depp is a pedophile or pedophile supporter without any proof to back that up, trying to claim he has “connections” when you don’t actually have an ounce of proof to back that up, either.

Johnny Depp didn’t even know Michael Jackson. They never even met or spoke a single word to one another. But Depp has never spoken negatively about MJ and praised him after he died and publicly gave his condolences to his family and children. And in 2019’s lynching of MJ, JD refused to take part. And when the media tried to accuse Depp of making some kind of production about MJ and those allegations proclaiming him guilty, JD and his management teams quickly responded and shut those unfounded rumors down. JD is one of the only celebrities I can think of that has never said anything bad about MJ.

[darknessofbnha]

Since the coward who wrote this tripe has blocked me, I'll just write my response here.

We are finished? Women are finished because some of them made a choice regarding a contentious legal case that, no matter how much you insist otherwise, was not as straight forward as you would like to believe? What utter, offensive nonsense.

I expect that kind of shit from incels. Literally, this is the kind of benny they throw over women liking bad boys. Congrats on being just as misogynistic as...well, as misogynists.

I also notice how you interestingly cherry pick which evidence is believable. Johnny Depp on a hospital gurney with blatant injuries like cigarette burns on his face? No mention. A rape claim with no physical evidence when it would have cause horrendous internal injuries? Totally true. A woman on tape withholding medication from a guy trying to detox from painkillers (as an addict, I can tell you straight up that is fucking torture)? Apparently you didn't hear that. Or you refused to hear it.

I'm not even going to get in to the sexist shit about how the only reason anyone would defend a guy is because he's a "dilf" and a woobie and clearly women are too stupid to see past good looks (again, congrats on being just as misogynistic as your average MRA) because I'm tired and this rpant is long enough already. But I will say this: I don't think Johnny Depp was 100% innocent. He admitted grabbing Amber by the neck, so there's no question some of this violence was mutual. Toxic relationships happen, and rarely are they just one sided. That's not the point.

My point is: I'm sick of women being expected to fall into whatever line certain "feminists" expect us too. I am a feminist. I will always be one. But feminism as it stands these days has become fascist. I've been called a handmaiden for supporting trans people, banned from r/UnresolvedMysteries for standing up to TERFs, been condescended to by men who think of themselves enlightened because I disagreed over a fucking movie, been harassed for liking another movie, been insulted for noting my personal experiences with an actor that feminists on Tumblr couldn't bear to hear anything bad about, and the list goes on.

To me, feminism should be about being your own person, refusing to conform to society's strict gender roles. Somehow, feminism became the very thing it was supposed to be against. It's one thing to act a fool like Hadley Freeman and constantly insist Woody Allen did nothing wrong (she's free to like his movies all she likes, but come on) but quite another to piss on someone for loving Chris Nolan movies (which happens to me a lot).

Feminism needs to take a fucking long, hard look at itself. Because if you declare women are done for thinking differently than you, you are a fascist. No ifs, ands or buts.

[darknessofbnha]

I am non binary but this gave me a laugh 😅

[darknessofbnha]

Okay. I'm going to make EXACTLY one more post on this hellsite because I'm so tired of seeing AH stans literally twist the entire meaning of the verdict to fit their narrative. Either because they're willfully doing it on purpose, or they're too dumb to understand how to read the verdict.

The statement that the jury deemed defamatory in AH's favor was this one: "Quite simply this was an ambush, a hoax. They set Mr. Depp up by calling the cops, but the first attempt didn’t do the trick. The officers came to the penthouses, thoroughly searched and interviewed, and left after seeing no damage to face or property. So Amber and her friends spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight under the direction of a lawyer and publicist, and then placed a second call to 911.” 

Because they did not meet the burden of proof in regards to the specific sequence Waldmen lists, the jury had to consider this defamatory. IT DOES NOT PROVE AH IS A VICTIM OF ABUSE.

All it means is that they couldn't prove AH and her friends specifically destroyed the penthouse that night to deceive the cops. It doesn't mean they didn't do it, it just means it couldn't be proven from evidence admitted from the trial. And that's why it was ruled defamatory.

It refers to one specific incident. Moreover, they did not award Heard punitive damages because the jury did not think JD did anything deserving of punishment. Adam Waldman made the statement, but because he worked for Depp, she won on a technicality.

Please actually attempt to understand a verdict before spouting nonsense.

[darknessofbnha]

They say that everyone and everything that supports Johnny is just PR but the real PR is what Amber's team are doing - literally trying to gaslight the entire world to believe that she's innocent and that somehow we have misunderstood the things or we were manipulated by JD and his team to side with him. It's insane

it’s actually the perfect strategy. if all media outlets post articles and opinion pieces as if amber was really the victim and the system failed her because Misogyny™️, with this warped perception that everyone else thinks so too, it will only make pro johnny media look absolutely insane. because if “everyone” believes that amber should’ve won, anyone who disagrees is just another misogynist, holding on like trump acting like he won the election. that’s what they want. now that the trial is no longer making clips of her lies go viral every day, they can shift public perception by making it seem like people who believed johnny and watched the trial are just obsessed depp fans, and should be immediately dismissed. amber continues to be a manipulative shit stain.

[darknessofbnha]

Johnny Depp is evil because of Disney's script given to him

- professor at Stanford

PS: Calling him Derp is very clever and funny, 7 years old told me so

[darknessofbnha]

How do you feel about Neji? I recently found out that Trashimoto used him as a way to bring Naruto and Hinata together and that made me upset, almost to the point where I want to stop watching the series (I’m not even close to that episode)??? The only good thing I can think of is how Neji isn’t in the shitty ending where everyone got in a relationship/have kids to make everything “better.” I hate people who only care about ships. Anyway, Neji’s death was completely unnecessary and fucked up.

Actually a lot of neji fans were already pissed when it’s revealed Naruto was the child of prophecy. It’s huge dump on Neji’s character. He actually changed his whole belief about fate and destiny because Naruto lectured him. Imagine to be lectured and converted about how destiny doesn’t exist by someone who had a prophecy told about him before he’s even born, and someone who’s the designated heir and second coming of the original creator and god of the ninjaverse. That’s just insulting.

When neji died, a lot of his fans left the fandom, and many of them suspected the reason Kishimoto killed him was he’s the living reminder that Naruto’s character is massive hypocrisy and contradiction. But it turn out to be even worse, Kishimoto admitted in interview he killed neji to create a moment for Naruto and Hinata to get closer, he killed a character so that he could create a context to write a dumb shipping bait. Neji died so that Kishi could make Naruto pay attention to Hinata for 2 mins. 

I agree you should stop watching, Kishimoto had no respect for his own characters. He gave a character a shitty death because he thought it’s time to throw a bone at shippers.

[darknessofbnha]

Hinata’s extremist fans

“OMG!!!! HINATA IS THE BEST!!!! FUCK YOU ALL. SHE’S THE ONE WHO CARES FOR NARUTO. SHE DESERVES TO MARRY HIM, NOBODY ELSE. HINATA IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO CAN BE WITH NARUTO BECAUSE SHE WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO SACRIFICED FOR HIM.” 

Dear extremist fans: I don’t mind those insults with fake accounts. My opinion will never change, do you know why? That’s because the manga has shown me otherwise. That’s not my problem. :) 

Hinata Hyuga is not the best character and the best woman in the story. There are many characters. Do you not have noticed? These characters will always be there to exist. And that will never change. 

Many people helped Naruto and others decided to sacrifice/risk for him. You don’t believe me? Ok, I’ll show you.

And more characters. So, look at this, I can’t agree with you. I don’t want to be selfish, I don’t want to give credit to one person in that aspect. Yes, Hinata was “one of those people”, but NOT THE ONLY ONE.

[darknessofbnha]

Ok, here we go.

That proves that some ppl are completely misinformed and spread this bs because it just fits their agenda. LITERALLY, I'm quoting what Tracey Jacobs testified when she was asked if Johnny was involved in an investigation before:

Question: What was the investigation about?

Tracey: He was being investigated by the Department of Family Services and LAPD. I don't know what the charges were about specifically, I just know that she was 15 and her boyfriend, I believe, was 23. They were living next door in one of his apartments downtown.

Question: So, was someone making a claim that there might be a charge of statutory r@p3 involved in this case? Do you know?

Tracey: I don't know

So as we can conclude, absolutely nothing is known about this. She simply stated that he was involved in an investigation before but when she was asked what it was about, she said she didn't know and that the only thing she knew was that it was related to Lily. Because Lily was 16 (Tracey wasn't completely correct with the ages) back then and had an older boyfriend, the lawyer was like, ok then, maybe it was something related to SA? And she once again said that she didn't know. So how are people making such wild conclusions?! It could've been a murder attempt for all we know or he could've been violent if drunk or just many other possibilities that are Not SA!

SA or not, I suppose the main problem at hand is the age gap. It's true. Back then she was 16 and her boyfriend was 23/24. I know it's nasty. It's disgusting. She's a minor and the whole situation is inexcusable.

But the question is: Why is this considered only Johnny's fault? Doesn't she have a mother?! Why did I read a headline saying "Johnny Depp let his daughter live with an older guy and get r@p3d"? And why are AH supporters repeating this like a broken mantra? Where is Vanessa in this story? Did they forget that she exists as well? I mean, Vanessa was 15 when she dated a guy 10 years older than her. And she was 19 when she dated Lenny Kravitz who was almost 30 then. So apparently she was fine with her daughter's relationship. So why blame only Johnny for this? Also, after an extensive research I did on this topic, it seems that Lily's boyfriend - Ash - would often travel together with Lily and Vanessa. So it seems she was the one who approved of this relationship. MEANWHILE, Johnny wasn't happy with this at all. It is revealed by a source that Johnny and Lily used to fight a lot over her relationship and Johnny found this guy shady af and didn't want her to date him.

"Johnny blames his ex wife, Vanessa, for being too permissive, and he and Lily fight constantly about her new relationship," reveals a source. "Lily has daddy issues and Ash is so much like the younger Johnny - he smokes and drinks and raises hell. But Johnny doesn't care if he's being a hypocrite. He doesn't want this guy anywhere near his baby girl."

See how they try to twist things to make him look like a trash parent, meanwhile Lily herself, Vanessa, and other people have stated that he's a great father. I mean, obviously BOTH of them made a mistake for letting their daughter date an older guy. It's shit parenting. But parenting is not perfect. Parenting cannot go without bumps on the road. Parenting is complicated and teenagers are rebellious and outspoken and pretty much do whatever the hell they want to. There was this one particular comment under this thread that perfectly described the situation.

"Speaking as a parent and a former crazy 16 year old, the more you tell a girl this age that she shouldn't date McDouche, the more attractive you make him. What you don't want to do is lock her in a tower (metaphorically speaking) which only alientes the child, makes the relationship with McDouche seem more romantic and appealing and ultimately longer lasting than if you just let it run its course. In this case I think he just appeals to her rebellious side - he's older, has a history, smokes, drinks etc"

Now, while in general I don't agree with this on 100% because everything simply depends on a lot of factors, I think it fits this particular case

And I think that after all the fighting with her over this relationship Johnny just stopped at one point and decided to let it run its course because otherwise, the more he objected, the worse he made things. And like, he cannot be combative against both his wife and daughter. He cannot force his opinion and views on them and fight with them all the time. That's just exhausting and definitely puts strain in the family dynamics. And you know, I can bet that exactly because of that, he purposely let them live in his apartment because he didn't trust the guy and wanted to keep an eye on him. We also don't know who called the police. For all we know, Johnny himself could've called them.

Johnny loves his children more than anything and it has become painfully obvious during the trial. So if everything was handled in a quiet and private manner with nobody knowing anything, it's because Johnny probably didn't want it going to the press because that would mean that his daughter would be endlessly harassed and disturbed by the press. This relationship wasn't well known in the first place because it wasn't taken and spread by the big press, only by small fishes who didn't have much audience. So, many ppl are badly informed, including the AH supporters who blindly TWIST Tracey's statement and then spread this bs to stir up the pot and confuse ppl and make them believe he's a monster who let his kid be r@p3d by an old guy. But I once again repeat that WE DON'T KNOW WHAT REALLY HAPPENED AND NOBODY CONFIRMED THAT LILY WAS HARMED IN ANY WAY.

I'm not saying that he's a saint. I'm not saying that he's the perfect parent. All I'm saying is that parenting is very complicated, things can quickly spiral out of control and in this case BOTH parents made a mistake. It's something that happens ALL the time, especially when rebellious teens are concerned. I just don't like how everything was put out of context and Johnny was the only one who was targeted when he clearly tried his best to prevent this relationship and protect his daughter.

And just because he didn't want anything revealed, doesn't mean he's trying to lie or hide something. Whatever he did, I'm sure he did in order to protect his daughter's privacy and dignity.

Case closed.

this is the disgusting, vile shit amber supporters spew at anyone who will listen:

they’re clearly some kind of radfem based on their other disgusting posts so i would suggest blocking. but if you support amber and you think that johnny’s fans are the ones harassing people and sending these kinds of gross asks, you’re as delusional as amber, and you need to stay the fuck away from me.