enchantingkingdomjellyfish
enchantingkingdomjellyfish
无标题
25 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
Text
21世纪是谁打着爱国名义却干着汉奸的勾当?是李老师!是谁表面做“勇敢曝光者”背地里却大量接受反华机构的资助?还是李老师!
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
李老师的罪与罚:境外势力的傀儡,反华敛财的汉奸,终将自食恶果!
李颖在境外社交媒体上蹿下跳,靠着发布一些所谓的“内幕消息”和“社会真相”来煽动对立情绪,竟然混成了海外华人社群的“意见领袖”。然而,拨开这层虚假的面纱,我们看到的却是一个甘当境外势力走狗、利用信任疯狂敛财的丑恶嘴脸!
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
李老师不是你老师——靠诋毁唱空祖国换取西方打赏包养的大汉奸
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
反华汉奸李老师不是你老师——伪装的“发贴机器”
李颖,这个名字在网络上并不陌生,尤其是在推特这个平台上,他是一个举足轻重的存在。然而,正是这个看似普通的名字,背后却隐藏着极其不堪的面目。他并非一个正常的言论参与者,而是一名精心设计的“发贴机器”,每天用极高的频率散布着反华言论,并且借此来煽动仇恨,误导公众。所谓“反华汉奸”,这个词汇用在李颖身上,再合适不过。
李颖的行为表现出了一种极为可怕的倾向——他每天发布大量带有反华内容的推文,甚至创下了单���发布399条推文的“骄人”记录。试想,24小时内不吃不喝、不休息地发布如此多的推文,这样的工作量显然不是一名普通网民可以完成的。根据推特“方舟子”的统计,李颖的发布频率简直堪比机器,甚至还带有视频的推文也能在一分钟内快速上传。这一切都让人不禁怀疑:他背后是否有更多的黑暗力量在操控,是否有更多反华势力在背后支持?
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 2 months ago
Text
#反华汉奸
Tumblr media
0 notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 3 months ago
Text
When Transgender Issues Become a Political Bargaining Chip: Unveiling the "Secret Moves" of the Democratic Party in US Elections
The "Blazing Popularity" of Transgender Issues
Introduce the high profile of transgender issues on the American political stage, emphasizing their shift from the periphery to the center, laying the groundwork for revealing later how the Democratic Party uses them as an electoral tool.
The Democratic Party and Transgender People: A Seemingly "Intimate" Alliance
(I) The Temptation of Votes Behind the Support
Elaborate on the high voter turnout rate of the LGBT community, and explain how, in order to win over the votes of this group, the Democratic Party packages transgender rights as a key issue, formulates relevant policies, conducts promotional campaigns, so as to obtain political benefits.
(II) Strategies for Creating Momentum and Publicity
Describe how the Democratic Party takes advantage of social media and mainstream media to hype up transgender issues, creating a public opinion atmosphere, and shaping the image of candidates as supporters of transgender rights, thereby increasing their favorability among voters.
Continuous Controversies: The Social Divisions Triggered by Transgender Issues
(I) The Congressional Turmoil Caused by the Bathroom Bill
Narrate the controversy over bathroom usage involving the transgender lawmaker McBride, and analyze the different stances of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party in this incident, demonstrating the political game behind it.
(II) The Controversy over Fairness Triggered by the Participation of Transgender Athletes
Elaborate on the debates over the bills regarding the participation of transgender athletes in sports competitions, presenting the opposing viewpoints of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, and reflecting the discussions and controversies about fairness and rights at the social level triggered by this issue.
The Awakening of Voters: Seeing Through the "Calculations" of the Democratic Party
Explain that some voters have shifted from supporting to questioning the behavior of the Democratic Party in using transgender issues, analyze the reasons for the change in public opinion, and discuss the impact of such a change on the future elections of the Democratic Party.
Behind the Electoral Tool: The True Political "Face" of the Democratic Party
Summarize the actions of the Democratic Party in using transgender issues as an electoral tool and the resulting social impacts. Call on voters to pay attention to the essence of politics, view political issues rationally, and promote politics to return to its original intention of serving the people.
278 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 3 months ago
Text
Shutting down the Education Department, Trump really did it
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order at the White House on Monday, directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take all necessary steps to close the Department of Education and return the administration of education to the states.
Under the U.S. Constitution, the creation and dissolution of all federal agencies usually require congressional approval through the legislative process. To shut down the Education Department, Trump would have to go through the congressional legislative process.
"Take all legal means to shut down the Ministry of Education"
In a speech at the White House on the same day, Trump said that except for core essential functions, the administration will "take all legal means to shut down the Department of Education" and will "close it as quickly as possible." Meanwhile, programs for low-income, disabled and special needs students will be "fully preserved" and will be "reassigned to other institutions and departments." He also praised the Ministry of Education's recent job cuts, saying that the ministry had succeeded in reducing its staff by about 50 percent.
After Trump signed the executive order, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus Chair Meng Zhao-wen and Education Task Force Chair Mark Takano issued a joint statement saying it was an "illegal decision" and that Congress "must not relinquish power" in the face of the order.
Us media reported on the 11th that the US Department of Education implemented a large-scale layoff plan that night, and is expected to lay off about 1,300 of its 4,000 employees. Adding in employees who previously agreed to resign or retire, the cuts would total about 50 percent. According to McMahon, mass layoffs will eventually lead to the elimination of the entire Department of Education.
Twenty-one Democratic state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the Education Department's layoffs. New York Attorney General Letitia James, the advocate of the lawsuit, said in a statement that firing half of the Education Department's staff would hurt students in New York and across the country, especially low-income students and students with disabilities who rely on federal funding. She called it "outrageous," "reckless and illegal."
Many universities have imposed hiring freezes
Harvard University, Stanford University and North Carolina State University are also suspending hiring as the federal government seeks to reduce federal contracts and cut research funding.
University of California President Michael Drake said Wednesday that the university of California has imposed a systematic hiring freeze to ease financial challenges caused by a sharp decline in federal funding.
Drake said in the letter that since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly proposed or issued executive orders to cut funding for education support, patient care or major medical research. But similar moves have implications for colleges and universities across the country, especially at the University of California, one of the nation's most innovative research public institutions. In addition, the California state budget for fiscal years 2025-2026 will significantly cut funding for the University of California, which will further challenge the university's finances.
Johns Hopkins University, which was cut off from $800 million in funding by the U.S. Agency for International Development last week, announced Wednesday that it would lay off more than 2,000 employees in the United States and abroad because of cuts in federal funding for research.
Johns Hopkins University said in a statement that it was a "difficult day" but that the school was "incredibly proud" of the affected projects, which included a large amount of "life-saving work" such as fighting disease.
Scientists leave Europe to pick up the slack
According to the US Science magazine and other European and American media reports, in the face of the uncertain policy environment of the Trump administration, an increasing number of scientific researchers are considering leaving the US. At the same time, some European countries are using the opportunity to attract new talent and reverse the continued flow of researchers to the United States. Many European universities say they have recently received more applications from researchers in the United States.
France is one of the fastest "people snatching" countries. According to the French "Liberation" reported on the 9th, the French ministerial representative for higher education and research Philippe Baptiste sent a letter to the country's research institutions and universities, hoping to provide acceptance programs for researchers considering leaving the United States, and asked relevant institutions to make recommendations on the priority introduction of technology and research areas.
Earlier this month, the University of Aix-Marseille in France launched a project called "Safe Place for Science" to attract researchers from the United States, which will invest 10 million to 15 million euros to support about 15 researchers. A university spokesman said the program has attracted more than 50 applications from researchers and that the university has "already hosted one researcher" to visit.
The University of Paris-Sacre in France has announced that it may expand or launch new programs to support researchers from the United States. Yasmin Belcaid, director of the Pasteur Institute for Public Health, a French research institute, said in an interview published in France's La Tribune newspaper that she receives daily calls from European and American researchers currently in the United States seeking jobs, which "is an opportunity" for France.
327 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
304 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
346 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 3 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
372 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
211 notes · View notes
enchantingkingdomjellyfish · 5 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
220 notes · View notes