extasiswings

[extasiswings]

I think one of the next threats might be to withhold state tax revenues from the federal government.

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

(This is in response to Kennedy gutting mRNA contracts)

[extasiswings]

Hnngh. The Audible "hack" is making the rounds again, with people claiming you can use your Audible credit to listen to a book and then return it "for free." While I am the first among many to say "fuck Amazon and we should gullotine Jeff Bezos," I need you all to know it's not Amazon refunding you.

It's the authors.

They take that out of our royalties. And that's after they take 80% of our royalties on sales we do make.

(Note: Also, do not assume that your credit is worth the price listing that Amazon shows. Amazon does not pay us the cost of the listing. ((WHICH THEY PICK, we cannot set our own prices on audiobooks and then that forces us to use the Amazon price for the rest of the market!!)) What we get is 20% of the credit's value, so my book might appear on Audible for $20-30. However, if you received an Amazon credit for one of those $4.99 deals, I'd get 20% of $4.99. Yes, it's fucked, it's all fucked. Yes, other audio retailers do the exact same thing. This is one of the reasons authors don't make half as much money as people think they do.)

This became such a big issue that they had to make it impossible to return books after a certain point without talking to a customer service representative, because people were using Kindle/Audible and Amazon's return policy "like a library," and some authors (myself included) were getting royalty checks that showed negative income.

At this point, I don't even know if the Audible "hack" still works (Amazon has made changes to protect authors from this kind of thing at a glacial pace), but I need you to know it's not Amazon that's refunding you. This isn't a fun little "fuck Amazon" thing. The way Amazon has it set up, it's directly fucking the authors over.

So, yeah. Obviously, if you download something and can't get into it, or if something pops up on the author's side that makes you not want to support them anymore, yeah, process that return. Yeet the bitch. But please don't use it "like a library."

It's really harrowing to see your predicted income based on sales and then find out you're getting one-tenth of that because of refunds. And it's not even because people didn't like your book. They're just using the wrong place like a library and fucking over your algorithm as well, because once you get too many returns, you stop getting promoted.

Try using a library. You can access places like @queerliblib for FREE provided you have a US library account that you've hooked up to Libby. It's a little bit of work, but once you've got a card number, you're golden.

Just, y'know, throwing it out there because I don't think people realize this is how it works. You're not taking something back to Walmart, and Walmart is eating the refund before dumping the item in the garbage. Amazon takes the refund, turns to the author, and takes it off our plates.

Note: this does not affect Kindle Unlimited. Flip through the end pages to give the author maximum pages read, and then return that bad boy so the author can get paid. But also, please, maybe think about switching to a Kobo+ account instead. It offers the same subscription-based membership without demanding exclusivity, so authors aren't locked into just Amazon the way they are with KU. (Royalty rates are roughly the same, but it's a better deal in terms of allowing broader market access.)

This has been a rambling and exhausted PSA from your local peddler of weres.

[extasiswings]

Wow, RINO

[extasiswings]

Anyway pritzker and hochul’s aggressive posture towards the Texas situation is what conservative and otherwise unaligned with “progressive” causes dems are supposed to be for. It is literally their role to be “concerned” with our policy goals, and nonetheless vote for them, just like Susan Collins and Lisa murkowski do, and to be the first ones to open the door towards nuclear-option politics when the other side goes to far. That is why you don’t get rid of them at other times.

[extasiswings]

Revolutionary Leftists: Noooo, don't retaliate with a gerrymander, the Republicans aren't our enemies uwu it's the Dems, pwease endorse Mamdani in this race he's pretty much guaranteed to win.

Normie Dems: I WANT KEVIN KILEY'S SEAT GONE!!!!!

[extasiswings]

I’m not going to wring my hands too much over Newsom and Hochul and other blue state governors looking into redrawing their congressional maps and gerrymandering. Republicans forced us to this point, and we have to use the tools and options available to us. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander. Hochul’s “apologies to good government groups, but we’re in a crisis” is kind of where I’m at. I think her quote sums it up perfectly:

“The playing field has changed dramatically, and shame on us if we ignore that fact and cling tight to the vestiges of the past. That era is over. Donald Trump eliminated that forever.”

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

[extasiswings]

wait I might be confused but the dems don't control the house or the senate right so why are so many people blaming them for stuff passing when the control is with the people who want to pass that stuff

[extasiswings]

are the women unfamiliar with rejection on the planet with us right now? where are the women who have never felt unwanted or ugly?

[extasiswings]