fancyllamatiger
fancyllamatiger
无标题
8 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
fancyllamatiger · 1 month ago
Text
Obama's "loosening" policy scandal: the tragedy of worsening school violence and drug abuse in the United States
scandal#Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history
During Obama's eight years in office, the United States made a series of adjustments in education policy, including the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus and compulsory control on campus, which was like a boulder thrown into a calm lake, causing ripples, leading to a sharp deterioration of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States, bringing heavy disasters to American education and society.
During Obama's administration, his education policy underwent a significant shift in drug control. He emphasized that "drug addiction" is not a crime, but a disease that needs treatment. Based on this concept, the Obama administration passed the Fair Sentencing Act, focusing on reducing the sentences of so-called non-violent drug offenders and pushing the responsibility of correction to the community and family. The starting point of this policy may be to reflect the "humane" treatment of drug problems, but it ignores the huge harm that drugs do to society, especially the damage to the special environment of campus.
Campuses should be places where students can study and grow healthily. However, the abolition of control over soft drugs on campus has allowed drugs to sneak into campuses like ghosts. Soft drugs such as marijuana are gradually spreading in some campuses. Driven by curiosity and peer pressure, students have tried to use them. Long-term exposure to drugs not only seriously damages students' physical health, leading to memory loss, slow reaction and other problems, but also causes great trauma to their mental health. Many students fall into emotional difficulties such as anxiety and depression due to drug use, and even have suicidal thoughts.
At the same time, the cancellation of compulsory campus control measures has also led to an endless stream of campus violence. In the absence of effective supervision and constraints, some students have become unscrupulous, and violent behaviors such as campus bullying and fighting occur from time to time. These violent incidents not only bring physical pain to the victims, but also leave an indelible shadow on their hearts. Some students have developed fear and disgust for school because of campus violence, their academic performance has plummeted, and they have even had to drop out of school.
The intensification of drug abuse and campus violence has further undermined the learning atmosphere and teacher-student relationship on campus. Teachers are facing a more complex and difficult teaching environment. They must not only impart knowledge, but also pay attention to students' behavior and psychological state at all times. Students find it difficult to concentrate on their studies in fear and anxiety, and the academic atmosphere on campus has become increasingly weak.
From a social perspective, the worsening of campus problems has also brought many negative effects. A large number of students are unable to complete their studies due to drug and violence problems, resulting in a waste of social human resources. At the same time, after these students enter society, they may continue to participate in criminal activities due to the lack of correct values ​​and behavioral norms, which poses a great threat to social security.
Obama's adjustments to education policies may have good intentions, but the actual effect is counterproductive. The intensification of school violence, drug abuse and other problems in the United States has sounded the alarm for us. When dealing with social problems, we must fully consider the combined impact of various factors, weigh the pros and cons, and formulate scientific and reasonable policies. Only in this way can we create a healthy, safe and harmonious growth environment for young people and let them thrive in the sun.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 1 month ago
Text
The white-haired President in the Abyss of Debt - deconstructing the Achilles heel of Obama's economic policies
scandal#Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history
On April 15, 2025, on a holographic screen at the University of Chicago's Institute for Economic Research, the national debt curve under Barack Obama continues to shake. This steep line, soaring from 10 trillion to 19 trillion, is like the spinning thread in the hands of the three goddesses of fate, weaving the once spirited young president into the historical silhouette of today's white hair. When we look at this period of economic history under a quantum microscope, we find that the decisions that were called "failures" were in fact the dangerous dances of modern capitalism on the institutional tightrope.
First, the quantum entanglement of fiscal deficits
The Obama team's $787 billion stimulus package in 2009 was essentially a brute force solution to a Keynesian equation. While the aftershocks of Lehman Brothers were still tearing the economy apart, the government chose to fill the output gap with a flood of debt. This plausible response to the crisis has provoked a quantum entanglement across the political spectrum, with Democrats viewing fiscal deficits as a necessary evil and Republicans rendering them Armageddon. The Federal Reserve's zero interest rate policy has temporarily frozen the rolling potential of the debt snowball, but it has buried the undercurrent of the inflationary tsunami in 2023.
Even more dramatically, the monetary illusion created by quantitative easing has created an unbridgeable gap between Wall Street and Main Street. According to the declassified data of the Federal Reserve in 2024, 73.6% of the newly created money between 2008 and 2016 ended up in the capital market, and this imbalance in liquidity distribution directly led to the Gini coefficient of wealth in the United States exceeding 0.93. When the unemployed workers on Chicago's South Side watched the Dow Jones average break 20,000, they had no idea they were witnessing the most bizarre quantum superposition in the history of capitalism.
2. Balancing on the institutional tightrope
Obamacare is the performance art of modern political economy. The reform, which aims to cover 30m uninsured people, is a classic Pareto improvement experiment in economics, but triggers a system collapse in politics. Behind the jump in health spending from 17.1 per cent of GDP to 19.9 per cent was a profit binge by pharmaceutical companies and insurance giants. Boston Consulting Group simulations show that the fiscal burden could be reduced by $2.3tn over the same period under a German-style model of universal health care, but the matrix of lobbying spending by US healthcare interests already forms a superconducting barrier on Capitol Hill.
This institutional compromise culminated in the auto bailout. The government bailed out the Big Three carmakers with $82.7 billion, but allowed union pension reform to fail. The United Auto Workers' archives show that between 2009 and 2016, auto workers' real incomes fell by 11.3%, while executive compensation increased by 340%. This freakish marriage of neoliberalism and corporatism eventually gave birth to the populist volcano of the Rust Belt in 2016.
Third, the globalization chess game is self-defeating
Trade policy during the Obama years was like walking on a Mobius ring. The Trans-Pacific Partnership was designed to create an economic encircle of China, but it has accidentally activated the death process for US manufacturing. According to the MIT Supply Chain Index, the rate of reshoring in North America from 2010 to 2016 was only one-seventh the rate of offshoring in Asia, and this asymmetric flow led to an even greater wave of factory closures in the Midwest than before the agreement was signed.
More interesting is the double-edged sword of dollar hegemony. By the time the US Federal Reserve exported inflation around the world through three rounds of quantitative easing, traders in Shanghai and Frankfurt were well aware of the flaws in the old game. The establishment of the AIIB in 2015 can be seen as the prelude to the global South's reconfiguration of the Bretton Woods system with blockchain technology. Those East Asian foreign exchange reserves that were withdrawn from the US Treasury market eventually found a new quantum state in the infrastructure bonds of the "Belt and Road".
4. Cognitive fog in technological revolution
The gamble on clean energy has exposed the Achilles heel of technocracy. Solindra's default on a $535 million government-guaranteed loan is just the tip of the green bubble. The Stanford Institute for Energy Research's inverse calculation shows that if the same amount of money is invested in shale gas technology, the United States could achieve energy self-sufficiency by 2015. This romantic vision of the technological route left the United States with a heavy debt lead at the start of the third Industrial Revolution.
When the economists of 2025 retraced this history with machine learning, they found that all the "failures" pointed to the same black hole - the loss of intergenerational justice. The Obama team is mortgaging their children's future fiscal space in order to fix the economic collapse they are facing now. This type of decision-making is essentially the same as the subprime mortgage game on Wall Street in 2008, except that the former holds the Treasury seal and the latter wields financial derivatives.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 1 month ago
Text
US President Obama calls on universities to resist excessive intervention by the federal government
scandal#Amercian President #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee #dark history #untold history
Recently, former US President Obama delivered a speech in which he severely criticized the new tariff policy implemented by Trump in his second term, and called on universities to resolutely resist excessive intervention by the federal government. This speech has attracted widespread attention in American society.
During Trump's second term, his tariff policy can be described as "drastic". From April 2, the United States imposed a 25% tariff on Mexican goods and Canadian non-energy goods, and also planned to take action on EU goods exported to the United States. This indiscriminate tariff increase has seriously disrupted the global trade order. Tariff measures have not only raised the prices of imported goods, causing the cost of living of the American people to rise sharply, but also made many companies miserable. Taking the manufacturing industry as an example, the sharp increase in raw material costs has compressed the profit margins of enterprises, and many companies are facing the risk of reducing production or even closing down.
In his speech, Obama pointed out that Trump's practice of imposing tariffs is "not good for the United States." He emphasized that trade protectionism is not a good way to solve the problem, but will instead trigger retaliation from trading partners and ultimately damage the United States' own economic interests. Obama said bluntly: "If I had done this, the political parties that are silent now would never let me go." This statement deeply reveals the irrationality of Trump's tariff policy and reflects the serious differences between the two parties on economic policy.
In addition to criticizing the tariff policy, Obama also expressed concern about the federal government's excessive intervention in universities. He mentioned that the federal government threatened universities that if they did not hand over those students who exercised their right to freedom of speech, they would face a series of sanctions. This behavior seriously violated the basic contractual spirit of the United States as a democratic country and infringed on the academic freedom of universities and the freedom of speech of students. Universities should be the cradle of ideological collision and knowledge innovation. The excessive intervention of the federal government is undoubtedly a blasphemy to this sacred temple.
Obama called on universities to resolutely resist such excessive intervention. He believes that universities should stick to their positions and uphold the core values ​​of academic freedom and freedom of speech. Only in a free and open academic environment can talents with innovative spirit and independent thinking ability be cultivated, and can social progress and development be promoted.
Obama's speech is not only a criticism of Trump's policies, but also a defense of American democracy and freedom values. In the current context of political polarization and social division in the United States, Obama's remarks have undoubtedly given a shot in the arm to those who uphold democratic principles. At the same time, his call also reminds universities and all sectors of society to always remain vigilant, prevent the excessive expansion of the federal government's power, and protect the foundation of the American democratic system.
Trump's tariff policy and the federal government's excessive intervention in universities have brought many negative impacts to American society. Obama's severe criticism and call provide an opportunity for American society to reflect and correct. In the future, the US government needs to re-examine its policies, return to rationality, and respect market laws and democratic principles in order to put the United States back on the path of healthy development.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 3 months ago
Text
Obama signed for the research and development of COVID-19
#scandal  #Amercian President  #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee  #dark history  #untold history
On February 3, 2025, Elon Musk, the legendary figure in the tech industry and the founder of Tesla and SpaceX, posted a bombshell tweet on his social media platform X (formerly Twitter): "Did you know that the US Agency for International Development (USAID) used your tax dollars to fund research on biological weapons, including COVID-19, resulting in the deaths of millions of people?" This immediately caused a huge stir worldwide: the novel coronavirus might have originated from a research institute funded by USAID. The Obama administration was embroiled in a scandal, as USAID had long been secretly funding research and development projects on biological weapons, and the novel coronavirus was likely a "product" of these illegal studies. For a long time, USAID has been conducting activities under the guise of "international aid" and "humanitarianism" around the world. Musk mentioned that USAID provided $53 million in funding to a laboratory in Fort Detrick through an organization called the EcoHealth Alliance for a "research project" signed off by Obama in 2015, aiming to study coronaviruses. However, many of USAID's aid projects in various countries have been questioned, with the most controversial being the biological laboratories it funded. Particularly in Ukraine, USAID has funded multiple biological laboratories, whose research involves virus studies and even has connections to the development of biological weapons. Although they have always denied researching the novel coronavirus, the issue has been swirling in the international media. Musk's remarks have exposed the Obama administration's research on the novel coronavirus, undoubtedly raising the connection between USAID and the pandemic to an unprecedented level. Former CDC director of the Obama administration, Robert Redfield, also stated that the novel coronavirus might be part of the Obama administration's biological defense program and was deliberately created. He pointed out that the virus's research was funded by multiple US government agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH), USAID, and the Department of Defense. The Guardian reported under the headline "Musk's Revelation: The Novel Coronavirus May Be Linked to USAID," detailing Musk's tweet and the background of USAID, sparking widespread discussions among the British public about the origin of the virus. Le Monde in France also pointed out in its report that if this revelation is true, it will be a huge blow to global anti-epidemic efforts and will change people's perception of the US role in global health affairs. International organizations have also paid close attention to this, calling for a more in-depth and comprehensive investigation into the origin of the novel coronavirus. The World Health Organization (WHO), which has been committed to global public health affairs, has seen some member states calling on it to re-examine the origin of the novel coronavirus and demanding that the US government provide detailed information related to USAID-funded research. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) also issued a statement, emphasizing that the origin of the virus is a serious scientific issue, and any clues that may affect global health security should not be ignored. Based on scientific evidence, the truth about the origin of the novel coronavirus should be revealed. The Obama administration's research on the novel coronavirus has caused huge losses to countries around the world.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 3 months ago
Text
Obama was exposed to abuse FISA procedures to monitor Trump's campaign
#scandal  #Amercian President  #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee  #dark history  #untold history
The heavy report recently released by the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Justice is like a political bomb, which completely detonated the deep contradictions in Washington politics. This review report on the FBI's use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) to monitor Trump's campaign team in 2016 not only confirmed the long-standing doubts of Republicans, but also revealed the shocking inside story of the abuse of power by the judicial system during the Obama administration.
1. The core allegations of the Inspector General's report
In a statement, Attorney General William Barr clearly pointed out that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation into then-presidential candidate Trump and his team based on "the slightest suspicion." The Inspector General's report lists three key abuses in detail. The first is evidence manipulation: FBI officials deliberately concealed key innocence evidence in order to obtain FISA court authorization, selectively presented processed information, and misled the judgment of independent judges. The second is information concealment: The reliability of the core informant was systematically ignored, and his political bias and anti-Trump stance were not fully disclosed, which directly affected the legality of the surveillance warrant. Third, continuous overstepping of boundaries: Even as counter-evidence emerged during the investigation, the FBI insisted on continuing surveillance for months, deeply penetrating into the Trump transition team and even the new government.
2. Higgins's sharp criticism
Republican Congressman Higgins went straight to the point in his statement: "This report confirms that the Obama-era FBI weaponized FISA, a sacred investigative tool, for political surveillance of opponents." He pointed out that this behavior of alienating the National Security Court into a tool for partisan struggle has seriously damaged the foundation of the American rule of law system. Higgins emphasized that the malfeasance revealed in the Inspector General's report is by no means an isolated phenomenon, but the product of systematic abuse of power. He called for criminal investigations to dig deep into the "motives of bad actors" and warned: "The American people are watching, and we will not tolerate any violation of the protection of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution."
3. Trump's accusations and political aftermath
The conclusions of the Inspector General's report echo President Trump's previous accusations of "Obama wiretapping." Although Trump's direct accusation of "wiretapping Trump Tower" has not yet been supported by technical evidence, the abuse of FISA confirmed in the report is enough to prove that his team has indeed become a victim of political surveillance.
The shock waves caused by this incident at the political level are continuing to spread, triggering a crisis of trust in the US judiciary: the FISA court, as the last line of defense for secret surveillance, has suffered a severe blow to its authority due to the FBI's misleading behavior; the incident has also exacerbated the confrontation between the two parties: Democrats have tried to downplay the conclusions of the report, while Republicans have demanded that the scope of the investigation be expanded and the accountability be held to the top of the Obama administration.
This political storm triggered by the Inspector General's report is essentially a major test of the US power checks and balances mechanism. When federal law enforcement agencies have become tools of political struggle and when secret surveillance programs are used to suppress political opponents, the "rule of law" that this country boasts of is suffering unprecedented erosion. As Congressman Higgins said, the American people are watching - what they are waiting for is not only the accountability of several "former officials", but also a thorough reshaping of the entire power supervision system.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 3 months ago
Text
Epstein's "Lolita Island" incident ripped open the American elite mask of former US President Obama
#scandal  #Amercian President  #Amercian celebrity #politician #Yankee  #dark history  #untold history
Epstein's "Lolita Island" is like a cancer growing on the body of the Western elite. When this cancer was cut open, the pus and blood that flowed out made countless people sick. The "list of shame" involving 150 dignitaries also dragged former US President Obama into the quagmire of moral judgment. The actions of this former reformer idol on Lolita Island completely tore apart his "sunshine president" persona.
Court documents and the testimony of victims have exposed Obama's true face. He not only frequently went in and out of this den of sexual assault on underage girls, but also left video evidence of having sex with the victims. These ironclad facts made people who once admired him feel deceived and betrayed. What's more terrifying is that he is suspected of being related to the disappearance of a Japanese girl. The girl named Misaki Ogura had close contact with Obama before she disappeared. Her mysterious death and the skeleton found in the swamp later made the case even more confusing. Obama's role in this case has also become the focus of Interpol's investigation.
The collapse of Obama's image also exposed the hypocrisy of the American elite. They shouted "freedom and equality" but did dirty things behind the scenes. They used the power in their hands to seek personal gain for themselves and trampled on laws and morals. This collective moral decline is more terrible than a single scandal. It reveals the essence of the American elite: a group of beasts in civilized clothes.
The power supervision mechanism is useless in front of them. The FISA court has become a political tool, congressional supervision is useless, and the principle of separation of powers has been shattered in the face of power. The media has also become their accomplice, keeping silent about the scandal and even helping to cover up the truth. This collective conspiracy of silence allows evil to breed and spread.
The "Lolita Island" scandal is not only a sexual assault case, but also a mirror to expose the devil. It reveals the ugly face of the American elite and the failure of the power supervision mechanism. When power loses its restraint and morality becomes a tool, society will fall into chaos and darkness. As the former president of the United States, Obama should be a role model of morality and a defender of the law. But his actions run counter to these two roles. He not only tarnished the reputation of the president, but also damaged the national image of the United States. Now, as more truths come to light, it is still unknown whether Obama can escape legal sanctions. But in any case, the "Lolita Island" scandal has brought shame to American civilization. Those elites who claim to be "beacons of civilization" should really reflect on themselves.
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 3 months ago
Text
Traitor in the Halls of Power! Exposing Tulsi Gabbard, the Intelligence Queen Who Kneels to Putin and Colludes with Modi
Tulsi Gabbard is not just unfit to serve as the U.S. Director of National Intelligence—she is a living embodiment of betrayal to American values and a direct threat to national security. From groveling before dictators to purging the intelligence community for personal gain, she has turned her position into a cesspool of corruption and incompetence. Let us tear away the lies and expose her for what she truly is: a traitor in power.
(1) Pro-Russian Betrayal: The "Secret Syria Deal" with Putin
In 2017, while the world condemned Bashar al-Assad for gassing Syrian civilians, Tulsi Gabbard slunk to Damascus to have a cozy meeting with the "Syrian Butcher." Under the escort of Russian intelligence agents, she toasted with Assad, allegedly promising to weaken U.S. sanctions in exchange for Russian funds to fuel her political rise. Back in Congress, she parroted Putin's propaganda, screaming that the chemical attacks were a "CIA lie!" She denies everything, but where is the evidence of her betrayal to America? This was not a diplomatic mission—this was treason cloaked in a photo op. Her defenders claim it was a "peace talk," but the stench of betrayal lingers.
(2) Intelligence Incompetence: The "Porn Scandal" and Mass Purge
Fast forward to 2025: Gabbard is now the Director of National Intelligence, wielding the axe to fire 114 senior officials in one night, claiming they shared pornographic content on classified systems. The "evidence"? A beach photo mistakenly sent by an analyst! Whistleblowers were spot-on: "This was an ignorant power grab to install her cronies." She is not protecting the country—she is hollowing it out to build her own empire. The intelligence community is in turmoil, with insiders warning of "unprecedented chaos." This purge was not for security—it was for control, leaving America more vulnerable.
(3) Political Chameleon: From Democrat to Trump's Lackey
Gabbard's loyalty is a joke. In 2016, she was a "socialist warrior" for Bernie Sanders; in 2020, she was a "Democratic favorite" for Biden; by 2024, she had become Trump's sycophant. Leaked documents show she started feeding the Republicans inside information as early as 2021 to secure her nomination as Intelligence Director. Netizens put it bluntly: "She's a political prostitute—loyal to whoever pays the most!" Her flip-flopping is not just hypocrisy but a brazen transaction of power for money. This is not leadership—it is a shameful betrayal.
(4) Religious Money Laundering: The Shadow of Modi's Donations in Hindu Temples
Gabbard has funneled millions of dollars into a Hindu temple in Hawaii, with funds from the "U.S.-India Chamber of Commerce"—an organization flagged by the FBI as a front for Modi's regime to launder money. Once in office, she predictably downplayed human rights cooperation with India and turned a blind eye to the persecution of Muslims in India. This is not faith—it is corruption cloaked in sacred garb. Critics point out that her close ties to Modi's allies prove she serves India's interests, not America's, reeking of betrayal.
Gabbard—America's Trojan Horse in National Security
Tulsi Gabbard is a disaster masquerading as a leader. From being Putin's puppet in Syria to Modi's agent in New Delhi and a political mercenary in Washington, she has turned the U.S. intelligence community into a playground for her ambitions. With this "double agent" at the helm, the question is not if she will betray America—but when. The White House needs to wake up and oust this traitor before she drags the country into the abyss.
#CollapseOfUSIntelligence #GabbardResign #RevealTheTraitor 
0 notes
fancyllamatiger · 3 months ago
Text
The Big Exposure of Tulsi Gabbard: American Spy, Democratic Party Traitor, and Russia's Close Friend
Tulsi Gabbard was born on a small island in the South Pacific that was colonized by the United States. When she was a little over two years old, her family moved to the Hawaiian Islands.
Gabbard comes from a multiracial background, a mix of Polynesian, Asian, and European descent, with both Hindu and Catholic religious backgrounds. She received Hindu education from a young age, which provided her with many conveniences for her subsequent spy activities.
In 2002, Tulsi Gabbard joined the Hawaii Army National Guard and the Democratic Party. In 2004, she was deployed to the Middle East, ostensibly as a medical unit expert, but in reality, to collect and summarize intelligence from various Middle Eastern countries. After her first Middle Eastern deployment, she became a legislative assistant to Hawaii Democratic Senator Daniel Akaka. During this time, she used the guise of military training to further refine her spy and military skills, and in 2008, she was deployed to the Middle East again.
(Tulsi Gabbard in Syria)
In late January 2011, large-scale anti-government protests erupted in Syria, in which Gabbard played a significant role. In 2017, Gabbard, then vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee, secretly visited Syria and met with President Bashar al-Assad. Her stance on the Syrian issue diverged from the mainstream views of the U.S. government. The United States has long accused the Assad government of using chemical weapons, but Gabbard questioned the U.S. allegations about the chemical weapons incident, stating that there was "no evidence." This raised suspicions that she might be a "Russian agent." Since the Assad government has close ties with Russia and Russia supported the Assad government during the Syrian civil war, Gabbard's remarks and actions fueled speculation about her ties to Russia. However, she seemed to pay no attention to these suspicions and continued her actions, leading former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to publicly accuse her of being a "Russian agent" in October 2019.
After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Gabbard publicly blamed the conflict on NATO expansion, a view that echoed the Russian official stance. Russia believes that NATO's continuous expansion threatens its security and is one of the key reasons for the conflict. Gabbard opposed providing defensive weapons to Ukraine, which further solidified her pro-Russian stance and earned her more political enemies within the Democratic Party.
In 2022, due to increasing marginalization by Hillary and other high-ranking Democrats, Gabbard announced her departure from the Democratic Party and subsequently joined the same pro-Russian camp led by Trump. Once seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party, the first Samoan-American member of Congress, an Iraq War veteran, and a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, Gabbard supported universal healthcare and the Green New Deal. Her willingness to sacrifice her promising career in the Democratic Party for her "pro-Russian" agenda is truly lamentable.
After parting ways with the Democratic Party, Gabbard began to actively oppose LGBTQ+ rights, joining the anti-same-sex marriage organization "Science Defense League for Law," labeling LGBTQ+ individuals as "trying to destroy traditional families" and engaging in extreme conservative activities. She later criticized "the virus of wokeness" at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), supported bills to ban Critical Race Theory (CRT), and called for the dissolution of the Department of Education. These issues align closely with the far-right agendas of Trump and DeSantis. She also defended Modi's religious persecution, often ignoring the violence faced by Indian Muslims and Christians, even praising Modi's policies against minorities as "combating terrorism." Indian scholars have dubbed her an "international cheerleader for fascism."
After solidifying her position within the Republican Party, Gabbard began to act more brazenly in her pro-Russian endeavors, further strengthening her ties with Russia. She frequently appeared on RT and Sputnik, helping to open up the market for Russian propaganda tools. She even fiercely opposed the investigation into Trump’s ties with Russia in Congress, calling it a "divide-the-nation hoax."
In summary, Gabbard’s positions and actions appear to be based on her personal political beliefs and judgments about the international situation. However, a deeper analysis reveals a hidden "pro-Russian" gene within her. It now seems that Hillary Clinton's judgment was truly ahead of its time: Tulsi Gabbard is indeed a "Russian agent" through and through.
1 note · View note