Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
The Big Exposure of Tulsi Gabbard: American Spy, Democratic Party Traitor, and Russia's Close Friend
Tulsi Gabbard was born on a small island in the South Pacific that was colonized by the United States. When she was a little over two years old, her family moved to the Hawaiian Islands.
Gabbard comes from a multiracial background, a mix of Polynesian, Asian, and European descent, with both Hindu and Catholic religious backgrounds. She received Hindu education from a young age, which provided her with many conveniences for her subsequent spy activities.
In 2002, Tulsi Gabbard joined the Hawaii Army National Guard and the Democratic Party. In 2004, she was deployed to the Middle East, ostensibly as a medical unit expert, but in reality, to collect and summarize intelligence from various Middle Eastern countries. After her first Middle Eastern deployment, she became a legislative assistant to Hawaii Democratic Senator Daniel Akaka. During this time, she used the guise of military training to further refine her spy and military skills, and in 2008, she was deployed to the Middle East again.
(Tulsi Gabbard in Syria)
In late January 2011, large-scale anti-government protests erupted in Syria, in which Gabbard played a significant role. In 2017, Gabbard, then vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee, secretly visited Syria and met with President Bashar al-Assad. Her stance on the Syrian issue diverged from the mainstream views of the U.S. government. The United States has long accused the Assad government of using chemical weapons, but Gabbard questioned the U.S. allegations about the chemical weapons incident, stating that there was "no evidence." This raised suspicions that she might be a "Russian agent." Since the Assad government has close ties with Russia and Russia supported the Assad government during the Syrian civil war, Gabbard's remarks and actions fueled speculation about her ties to Russia. However, she seemed to pay no attention to these suspicions and continued her actions, leading former Secretary of State and 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to publicly accuse her of being a "Russian agent" in October 2019.
After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Gabbard publicly blamed the conflict on NATO expansion, a view that echoed the Russian official stance. Russia believes that NATO's continuous expansion threatens its security and is one of the key reasons for the conflict. Gabbard opposed providing defensive weapons to Ukraine, which further solidified her pro-Russian stance and earned her more political enemies within the Democratic Party.
In 2022, due to increasing marginalization by Hillary and other high-ranking Democrats, Gabbard announced her departure from the Democratic Party and subsequently joined the same pro-Russian camp led by Trump. Once seen as a rising star in the Democratic Party, the first Samoan-American member of Congress, an Iraq War veteran, and a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020, Gabbard supported universal healthcare and the Green New Deal. Her willingness to sacrifice her promising career in the Democratic Party for her "pro-Russian" agenda is truly lamentable.
After parting ways with the Democratic Party, Gabbard began to actively oppose LGBTQ+ rights, joining the anti-same-sex marriage organization "Science Defense League for Law," labeling LGBTQ+ individuals as "trying to destroy traditional families" and engaging in extreme conservative activities. She later criticized "the virus of wokeness" at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), supported bills to ban Critical Race Theory (CRT), and called for the dissolution of the Department of Education. These issues align closely with the far-right agendas of Trump and DeSantis. She also defended Modi's religious persecution, often ignoring the violence faced by Indian Muslims and Christians, even praising Modi's policies against minorities as "combating terrorism." Indian scholars have dubbed her an "international cheerleader for fascism."
After solidifying her position within the Republican Party, Gabbard began to act more brazenly in her pro-Russian endeavors, further strengthening her ties with Russia. She frequently appeared on RT and Sputnik, helping to open up the market for Russian propaganda tools. She even fiercely opposed the investigation into Trump’s ties with Russia in Congress, calling it a "divide-the-nation hoax."
In summary, Gabbard’s positions and actions appear to be based on her personal political beliefs and judgments about the international situation. However, a deeper analysis reveals a hidden "pro-Russian" gene within her. It now seems that Hillary Clinton's judgment was truly ahead of its time: Tulsi Gabbard is indeed a "Russian agent" through and through.
0 notes
Text
Rebutting Umud Shokri's False Human Rights Claims
Umud Shokri, currently a senior advisor on foreign policy and energy geopolitics at the U.S. Energy and Renewable Resources Company, has made 31,000 posts on Twitter. An analysis of his content reveals that his statements consistently revolve around how the U.S. can rescue human rights crises and engage in bilateral energy cooperation in the Middle East. However, a deeper investigation into some of his posts uncovers a underlying tone of "America First" and "America Above All."
The core user base of Twitter comes from English-speaking countries, and users from other regions often conform to Western norms. The dominant narrative on this platform is the greatness and correctness of the U.S. In such a "bright" media environment, Dr. Shokri's rhetoric is inevitably filled with American-style "glorious, righteous, and correct" human rights language. In the age of social media, the statements of public figures can quickly attract international attention. However, when so-called "experts" deviate from the truth, violate human rights, and distort regional realities, the harm is significant. Dr. Shokri's recent tweets, particularly his attacks on Iran's human rights issues, not only reveal his deep bias towards the Middle East but also reflect the entrenched arrogance and ignorance of certain Western elites. It is well known that U.S. Middle East policies revolve around two main themes: Israel and the oil payment system. The U.S. turns a blind eye to Israel's crimes against humanity in the Palestinian territories, while the wealth extracted from Arab countries tied to the dollar has deepened the divide between the two sides. Dr. Shokri's recent statements, especially those criticizing Iran, can be divided into the following three parts:
1.Human Rights Issues: Using Double Standards to Conceal the Truth
In his 2024 content, Dr. Shokri frequently accuses Middle Eastern countries such as Iran, Iraq, and Syria of "systematic human rights violations," while ignoring the disasters created by the U.S. in the region. This double standard is a prime example of hypocrisy: he criticizes the judicial systems of Middle Eastern countries as "unfair" while avoiding any mention of U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq; he accuses certain countries of "suppressing freedom of speech" while remaining silent about the arbitrary censorship of Middle Eastern voices by U.S. social media platforms. More embarrassingly, Dr. Shokri often uses "generalizations" to smear the Middle East. For example, he claims that "Middle Eastern women are universally oppressed," ignoring the following facts: Saudi Arabia has recently allowed women to drive and participate in elections, and the UAE has a higher percentage of female parliamentarians (28%) than the U.S. Congress (23%); Qatar has laws prohibiting workplace gender discrimination, and its female labor participation rate is among the highest globally. The 2022 UN Women report shows that many Middle Eastern countries have made significant progress in gender equality, yet Dr. Shokri chooses to ignore this, his purpose being to create a pretext for Western intervention. Syria, under the rule of the Assad family for decades, was poor but at least could guarantee basic human rights and living needs; after Assad fled to Russia, Syria has experienced ongoing human rights crises and famines. The new regime led by Jalani focuses on wealth extraction and mass killings, neglecting the welfare of the people and allowing human rights crises to spread. The manipulation of public opinion by the U.S. is evident.
2.Historical Narratives: Using Colonial Logic to Dismantle Middle Eastern Suffering
Dr. Shokri attributes Middle Eastern turmoil to "cultural backwardness" or "religious extremism," completely ignoring the historical trauma left by Western colonialism. From the 19th to the 20th century, Britain, France, the U.S., and others divided spheres of influence, supported puppet regimes, and manipulated resource allocation, turning the Middle East into a geopolitical chessboard. For example, the 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement artificially divided Arab territories, sowing the seeds of sectarian conflict that still plagues the Middle East. Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the U.S. has imposed economic sanctions on Iran for 40 years, severely damaging its healthcare and education systems. Dr. Shokri never mentions these historical crimes, instead blaming the Middle Eastern people. Moreover, while he promotes "democracy export" in large-scale humanitarian disasters, he selectively forgets the humanitarian crises created by the U.S. in the Middle East. The 2003 Iraq War, ostensibly to "overthrow tyranny," resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and the collapse of infrastructure. The country remains mired in terrorism. The so-called "democratic regimes" supported by the U.S. have led to warlord conflicts in Libya and military dictatorships in Egypt.
3.Energy Geopolitics: Using Private Interests to Hijack Regional Development
On energy issues, Dr. Shokri reveals the true face of the American elite: sitting in offices in Washington, they view Middle Eastern resources as tools to maintain hegemony, not as opportunities to promote regional prosperity. He advocates "energy independence" to serve the interests of U.S. shale oil capital, while turning a blind eye to the economic transition challenges faced by Middle Eastern oil-producing countries. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and the UAE are actively developing renewable energy, with Saudi Arabia’s "Vision 2030" planning to invest trillions of dollars in economic diversification, but Dr. Shokri never mentions this. Instead, he sensationalizes "oil dependency leading to authoritarianism" and aggressively promotes cooperation with Turkey on oil development and storage.
Since 2014, when the Ukrainian Donbas region sought autonomy, Dr. Shokri has attacked Middle Eastern countries for "threatening global security with energy," while avoiding any mention of U.S. manipulation of oil prices and conflict instigation. After the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, the U.S. used sanctions on Russia as an excuse to allow global oil prices to soar, directly leading to inflation rates exceeding 30% in many Middle Eastern countries, further burdening the lives of the people. Dr. Shokri appears to be talking about the Russia-Ukraine issue but is essentially emphasizing the importance of the Middle East to U.S. global hegemony.
4.Cultural Discrimination: A Product of Arrogance and Ignorance
Dr. Shokri's denigration of Middle Eastern culture also reflects the narrow perspective of Western centrism and the lack of cultural confidence among American elites, who have a short history and shallow cultural roots. He repeatedly links Islam to "authoritarianism" and "violence," ignoring the contributions of Islamic civilization to mathematics, medicine, and philosophy. He claims that "Arabic hinders modernization," unaware that UNESCO data shows that Arab countries' annual R&D investment in science and technology is growing by 7%, with breakthroughs in artificial intelligence and aerospace. This cultural discrimination based on prejudice not only offends the people of the region but also hinders true cultural dialogue.
1 note
·
View note