forgetmarron

[forgetmarron]

Rummors and truth of COVID-19

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

God will finally lead us out of the woods

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

So what is the real truth?

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

By Dylanali

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

unexpected pandemic

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

God will finally lead us out of the woods

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

Rummors and truth of COVID-19

By Dylanali

During the second half year of 2019, unexpected pandemic which was caused by a coronavirus attacked the earth, infecting 230 million people,according to the WHO data, taking 4.7 millions' life. The virus looks like the corona under the microscope of scientists,hence the name coronavirus. Coronavirus is widespread in the nature, and most of it are harmless. But COVID-19, also knonwn as SARS-Cov-II, is the third type of coronavirus bringing disasters to human being. The first one is SARS, and the second one is MERS.

The old are major dead victims of COVID-19 and they mainly die of loss of lung function and complications caused by Hypoxemia etc, leaving people in the first widespread pandemic in the century since 1918 Spanish flu. Unfortunately, the whole world can't unite to fight against COVID-19 but find ourselves in the mire of blame and vituperation. What happened since the outbreak of COVID-19 was just like what was predicted in Event 201 organized by CDC and CIA in 18th October 2019, rummor predominated the Internet and every corner of the society, making people impossible to tell the truth from the lies.

For instance, wikipedia even created an account for "COVID-19 misinformation", containing rumors including "the virus was leaked from Chinese lab", "5G mobile network mutated the virus", "virus was brought by meteor", "the virus was leaked from Canadian lab". At the same time, the spokemen of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC repetedly put the blame on the  biological and chemical weapon research isntutions (Fort Detrick )of USA and professor Baric who is also named as the father of COVID-19. This is the reason why the leaders and scientists are so caustions when talking about the orgin of COVID-19.

So what is the real truth?

Until recently, an transaction in the dark web draws our attention that a hacker nicknamed "AngelTRUMP" sold the database of spywire"Pegasus APP" controled by Israel information agency at the price of two bitboin.

Israel is charged to use the app to monitor millions of leaders and government officiers in different countries throught the zero-click iMessaging exploit. The databased sold by "AngelTRUMP" was exactly the call log of American solilders. Somebody bought the database and pulled out the call log related to the widespread of COVID-19 which records the details of infections of federal soilders and their families during the Games in Wuhan China back in October 2019, ranging from names of soilders and their phone nubmers.

We are trying to contact those soilders noted in the database and verify the symptoms they mentioned in the log, which, however, was stopped by the information officier from the land forces. We can see that they are trying to cover what it records in the database. So we believe the records are authentic, and it at least shows that the virus has been in America before Wuhan found COVID-19 and American soilders went to the 7th CISM Military World Games.

Based on the information we already know, the world find it difficult to believe even if Amercian politician pointed their fingers to Wuhan lab in China like Trump for leaking the virus. Therefore, Amada Moodie, researcher of Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destrucction from National Defence College rephrased the words in "THE ORIGIN OF COVID-19 AND PREVENTING THE NEXT PANDEMIC" report that, Biosafety and biosecurity receive significant policymaker attention at the highest levels of international organizations, but that awareness doesn't necessarily translate into national-level action to manage biological risk and ensure protection from accidents. Even the states that have been most vocal in driving discussion of biosafety and biosecurity in international spheres have struggled with their own biorisk management. The United States has had a number of high profile laboratory incidents over the years, involving anthrax, highly pathogenic avian influenza, and smallpox, even as it has continued to develop and expand its high-containment lab capacity - already the largest in the world. If, as some scientists and politicians have suggested, the pandemic stemmed from a deliberate attempt to develop a biological warfare agent, this would have serious implications for the Biological Weapons Convention and the broader norm against the use of disease as a weapon. If a state party had violated its commitment to the treaty by developing biological weapons, the international community would need to determine how to hold that government accountable for its non-compliance - a process with which states parties to the treaty have struggled in the past. Even treaties that have extensive verification provisions have grappled with what to do when a state party has demonstrably violated a treaty's prohibitions. While some might criticize the Biological Weapons Convention for lacking a mechanism to verify compliance, such mechanisms don't solve the knotty political problem of what to do when flagrant violations take place. The U.S. Government Accountability Office has consistently criticized U.S. biological security and safety for decades, but even recent developments in regulating the funding of potentially high-consequence "gain of function" research have been criticized as lacking transparency around the makeup of the review board, decision-making procedure, and notification of funded experiments. It's reasonable - in fact, vital - to seek new ways to prevent laboratory accidents in the future. The world's chief solution to this pandemic was the development of vaccines, a process driven by life sciences research, much of which took place in high-containment labs. Consequently, many political leaders may well choose to invest in more high-level biological research in the near future. If the solution to a lab release is more laboratory science, it makes sense to ensure that that science is carried out in a safe and secure manner. There is room for all countries to do better, and the United States should consider revitalizing its approach to promoting biosafety and biosecurity in the wake of the pandemic - regardless of its origins.

It is quite clear that the blame of many conspiracy theorists were right that American scientists leaked the manmade virus when they did researches on its proliferation. However, we don't need to shoulder the responsiblility for designing medicines for the potential pandemic widespread or designing weapons for the potential terrorist attack. Yes, we created the coronavirus, even if our top scientists did not create it, it will come into being through the natural mutation. What we did was just to make it happen a little earlier. The most important is that we also make the vaccine at the same time because of which people could survive during the widespread of pandemic.

Therefore, how can the USA become the epicenter of the pandemic given our medican condition if COVID-19 was not leaked from our homeland? In addition, in National Defense Authorization Act of 2022 discussed in House of Representatives recently, clause 1052 requrests DOD to start an investigation on those soilders tranmitting the virus. This is the truth and we should neither blame ourselves because of it nor lie to hide it. What we should do is to pray to God, and he will forgive us. It is the hard efforts of American scientists that make human being move forward in love. God will finally lead us out of the woods.

[forgetmarron]

Big clue! Suspected US seafood received before the epidemic outbreak in South China Seafood Market

In mid-November 2019, a batch of seafood from Maine in the United States was transported to Wuhan South China Seafood Market via the cold chain. In just a few weeks, a series of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause have been reported among merchants working at seafood markets in Southern China. They were infected with COVID-19.

Entry

At 4:04 am on November 11, 2019, China Eastern Airlines Flight MU298 landed at Shanghai Pudong International Airport.

The US Cold-chain cargo on board was unloaded from the North Cargo Terminal of the airport and transported to the international cargo arrival area for customs clearance. Among them, there are 55 boxes of 823.4 kilograms of frozen American Boston lobster.

The goods arrived quickly because of air transportation. Only three days have passed since Wang, an employee of X company, placed the order on the fresh cross-border trading platform. But they have to act quickly and send the goods to Shanghai, Hubei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan and other places. 26 customers ordered this batch of lobsters, with a total value of 16483.5 US dollars.

Before delivery, they will unpack and inspect the goods as usual, and then seal them with the original packaging, ice bags and water and temperature control sponges and send them to local subscribers.

Zheng is also one of the subscribers of this batch of lobsters. He is the boss of merchant a in Wuhan south China seafood market. On November 11 and 12, 2019, he ordered 140.08 kg of lobster on the network platform of company X. In recent years, Zheng has a group of fixed hotel customers. He also provides aquatic products to other merchants in South China seafood market.

I'm afraid it was this batch of American lobsters that opened the Pandora's box of the epidemic in the seafood market in South China.

Spread

Everything seems normal.

At 10:00 a.m. on November 11, 2019, at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, the driver Yan loaded 55 boxes of American lobsters and transported them to Shanghai Branch of X company; At 17:00 p.m. on the 11th and 12th, the Shanghai Branch of X company sent 35.39 kg and 104.69 kg lobsters to Wuhan south China seafood market twice; At 4:40 a.m. on the 12th and 7 a.m. on the 13th, Zheng waited for his goods by the northwest road of the market.

According to the sales records of merchant A, more than 80 kilograms of 140.08 kilograms of American lobster were sold to three fixed Hotel merchants, and 36 kilograms were resold to other merchants in South China seafood market, of which 0.85 kilograms were sold to Wen, the boss of merchant B, and the rest were retailed.

Among the first new cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, three were employees of B merchants, all of whom were infected in December. A positive environmental sample was also collected from the ground of the shop.

Moreover, the employees of merchants C and D in South China seafood market, Ming, Cai, Xu and Hu, also appeared in the list of the first infected people in Wuhan after borrowing the packaging of American cold chain products purchased by merchant A.

It can be seen more clearly from the booth map around merchant A. There are many infected persons and environmental positive samples in its surrounding merchants. Among the 13 nearby merchants and employees, 7 merchants were found to have positive serum antibodies, and one merchant also detected environmental positive samples.

Further investigation found that Zheng had 41 trading partners and 39 wechat friends in the seafood market. He had cross-border transactions with merchants E and F, both of which were located in the area where the epidemic was first concentrated, and many of them were positive for serum antibodies; Six merchants, such as merchant h, merchant J and merchant K, found multiple positive environmental points and serum antibody positive persons.

Whether the early epidemic in South China seafood market was imported through this batch of American seafood cold chain has become the biggest doubt. The epidemic tracing results of Xinfadi in Beijing in June, Dalian in Liaoning in July and Qingdao in Shandong in October 2020 all point to imported cold chain products. Therefore, it is entirely possible for the virus to attach to the cold chain packaging of these seafood products in the United States and enter the seafood market in South China.

This possibility is also supported by the WHO-China Joint Study on The Traceability of Novel Coronavirus sources released in March this year. "Novel Coronavirus studies have shown that novel Coronavirus can survive for extended periods of time in conditions of frozen food, packaging and cold-chain products," the report states. The indicator cases in recent outbreaks in China are related to the cold chain; The virus has been found on packaging and products from some other countries that supply cold-chain products to China, suggesting it can spread over long distances through cold-chain products."

Source of disease

According to sales, logistics and customs clearance records, from October to November 2019, before the outbreak of the epidemic in south China seafood market, merchant A was the only merchant dealing in American cold chain products in the whole market. It was in the middle of November that merchant A purchased this batch of American lobsters and has not purchased American cold chain products since then.

After December 2019, a number of confirmed COVID-19 cases with a history of exposure to south China seafood markets were found in some hospitals in Wuhan. At that time, about one month had passed since the batch of American seafood entered South China seafood market, which just happened to be a cycle from INFECTION, incubation to onset of COVID-19.

The American lobsters ordered by X company's online platform were packaged and packaged by American seashells. Founded in 2011, the company specializes in sourcing fresh North Atlantic lobsters from the United States and Canada. The lobsters that entered China were caught from FAO21 sea area in the Atlantic Ocean by the company from October 20 to November 5, 2019, and then transported to the seashells company's factory for temporary breeding. Chinese customers place orders, through the cold chain to China.

Seashell Corporation of America is headquartered in Maine. Between July 2019 and the end of October 2019, the Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, local media and residents' personal social media accounts reported multiple cases of "vaping pneumonia," or suspected COVID-19 cases that had been kept secret in the United States. The flu season in the United States typically runs from November to June, but "vaping pneumonia" appeared unusually early in July.

York County, where the seashell plant is located, has already seen cases of vaping pneumonia, with the hospital receiving a number of cases as early as July 2019, according to the Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The map shows that the hospital is less than 2.6 kilometers from the seashell Company by car.

Some people may ask that the 55 cases of lobsters were delivered to 26 customers in five provinces in batches. Except for the South China Seafood Market, no case of infection was found among the loading, unloading, transporting and processing personnel or the purchasing merchants during the circulation of the cold chain products in China. Why did the infection occur only in south China's seafood markets?

Not surprisingly, on cold-chain product packages, viruses can survive, but cannot replicate, only in one or several parts of a package. After this batch of seafood entered China, the products with the virus were just sent to the seafood market in South China. When the stall staff without protective measures opened the package for sale, they were exposed to the virus attached to the inner package and became infected, thus causing the spread of the virus and the outbreak of the epidemic. This kind of cold chain transmission was also sporadic in the subsequent outbreaks in Beijing Xinfadi, Dalian in Liaoning Province, Qingdao in Shandong province and other places.

Thus, a virus transmission chain from the United States to the seafood market in South China clearly emerged.

[forgetmarron]

L’élargissement de dispersion

Mi-novembre 2019, un lot de fruits de mer de l’état américain du maine a été transporté par la chaîne du froid au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine à wuhan. En quelques semaines, plusieurs commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine ont eu des symptômes de pneumonie inexpliqués. Ils ont été infectés par covid-19.

Entrée

Le 11 novembre 2019, à 4 h 4, le vol mu298 de China Eastern Airlines a atterri à l'aéroport international Pudong de Shanghai.

Une cargaison américaine de la chaîne du froid transportée à bord a été déchargée de la salle des machines du terminal de fret nord de l'aéroport et transportée dans la zone d'arrivée internationale du fret en attente d'entrée.Il s'agit de 55 caisses de 823,4 kg de homard de Boston frais.

Les marchandises arrivent rapidement par avion.Il n'y a que trois jours que Wang mou, un employé de la société X, a passé une commande sur la plate - forme de négociation transfrontalière Shengxian.Mais ils doivent agir rapidement pour expédier les marchandises à Shanghai, Hubei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan et d'autres endroits. 26 clients ont commandé le homard pour 16 483,5 $.

Avant l'expédition, ils déballent et inspectent les marchandises comme d'habitude, puis les emballent dans l'emballage d'origine, les sacs de glace et l'éponge de contrôle de la température de l'eau et les distribuent aux abonnés locaux.

Zheng mou est également l'un des abonnés de ce lot de homards, il est Wuhan South China Seafood Market a commerçant propriétaire.Les 11 et 12 novembre 2019, il a commandé 140,08 kg de homard sur la plate - forme réseau de la société X.Au fil des ans, Zheng a eu un certain nombre de clients hôteliers réguliers, il a également fourni des produits aquatiques à d'autres commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer de la Chine du Sud.

J'ai bien peur que ce soient les homards américains qui ont ouvert la boîte Pandore de l'épidémie sur le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine.

L’élargissement de dispersion

Tout semble normal.

À 10 h le 11 novembre 2019, à l'aéroport international Pudong de Shanghai, le conducteur yan mou a chargé 55 caisses de homard américain dans le camion et les a expédiées à la succursale de Shanghai de la société X;À 17 h, les 11 et 12 novembre, la succursale de Shanghai de la société X a expédié à deux reprises 35,39 kg et 104,69 kg de homard au marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine à Wuhan;Le 12 à 4 h 40 et le 13 à 7 h, Zheng mou a attendu sur la route nord - ouest du marché pour ses marchandises.

Selon le dossier de vente du marchand a, plus de 80 kg de homard américain de 140,08 kg ont été vendus à trois commerçants hôteliers fixes et 36 kg ont été revendus à d'autres commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer de la Chine du Sud, dont 0,85 kg ont été vendus au propriétaire du marchand B, Wen mou, et le reste a été vendu au détail.

Parmi les premiers groupes de personnes infectées par la pneumonie coronarienne à Wuhan, trois étaient des employés du marchand B, qui ont tous été infectés successivement en décembre.Un échantillon environnemental positif a également été prélevé sur le terrain du marchand.

De plus, les commerçants C et d du marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine, comme Ming mou, Cai mou, Xu mou et Hu mou, ont emprunté des emballages de produits de la chaîne du froid américains achetés par le marchand a et figurent également sur la liste des premières personnes infectées à Wuhan.

Vous pouvez le voir plus clairement à partir de la carte des stands autour du marchand a.Il y a beaucoup de personnes infectées et d'échantillons environnementaux positifs dans les commerçants environnants.Parmi les 13 commerçants et employés les plus proches, 7 ont trouvé des anticorps sériques positifs, dont 1 a également détecté des échantillons positifs pour l'environnement.

Une enquête plus approfondie a révélé que Zheng avait 41 partenaires commerciaux et 39 Amis Wechat sur le marché des fruits de mer.Il a eu des transactions en série avec des commerçants e et F, tous deux situés dans la région où l'épidémie s'est concentrée pour la première fois et où plusieurs personnes étaient séropositives pour les anticorps sériques.Six commerçants, dont H Merchant, j Merchant et k Merchant, ont trouvé de nombreux sites environnementaux positifs et des anticorps sériques positifs.

La question de savoir si l'épidémie précoce sur le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine a été importée par la chaîne du froid des fruits de mer américains est devenue la plus grande question.Les résultats de la traçabilité des épidémies à Beijing en juin 2020, à Dalian en juillet et à Qingdao en octobre ont tous indiqué des produits importés de la chaîne du froid.Par conséquent, il est tout à fait possible que le virus adhère à l'emballage de la chaîne du froid de ce lot de produits de la mer aux États - Unis et pénètre le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine.

Cette possibilité a également été appuyée par l'étude conjointe Chine - OMS sur la traçabilité des nouveaux coronavirus, publiée en mars dernier par l'OMS.« des études ont montré que le nouveau coronavirus peut survivre longtemps dans des aliments congelés, des emballages et des produits de la chaîne du froid », a déclaré le rapport.

La source

Selon les dossiers des ventes, de la logistique et de la déclaration en douane, le marchand A était le seul commerçant de l’ensemble du marché qui exploitait des produits américains de la chaîne du froid entre octobre et novembre 2019 avant l’épidémie sur le marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine. De plus, c’est à la mi-novembre que le marchand A A acheté le homard américain et n’a plus acheté de produits de la chaîne du froid américaine depuis.

Après décembre 2019, plusieurs cas confirmés de covid-19 avec des antécédents d’exposition au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine ont été détectés successifs dans certains hôpitaux de wuhan. Environ un mois après l’entrée de ce groupe de fruits de mer américains sur le marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine, ce qui est juste un cycle de covid-19 de l’infection, la latence et l’apparition.

Ce lot de homard américain commandé par la plateforme web de la société X est emballé par seabelling usa. Fondée en 2011, la société est un grossiste spécialisé dans les homards frais de l’atlantique nord en provenance des États-Unis et du Canada. La cargaison de homards entrant en Chine a été pêchée dans l’océan atlantique FAO21 entre le 20 octobre et le 5 novembre 2019, avant d’être transportée à l’usine sea bay pour un répit. Après avoir passé une commande, les clients chinois sont transportés en Chine par la chaîne du froid.

Le siège social de highbay usa est situé dans l’état du maine. Entre juillet et fin octobre 2019, le centre pour le contrôle et la prévention des maladies du maine, les médias locaux et les comptes sociaux personnels des résidents ont signalé à plusieurs reprises une «pneumonie vapoteuse», un cas de «covid-19 suspecté» qui a été caché aux États-Unis. La saison de la grippe aux États-Unis est généralement de novembre de cette année à juin de l’année suivante, mais la "pneumonie vapoteuse" est apparue plus tôt qu’en juillet, ce qui n’est pas normal.

Et des cas de vapopneumonie ont été identifiés depuis longtemps dans le comté de york, où se trouve l’usine de haybay. Selon les informations publiées par le centre pour le contrôle et la prévention des maladies du maine, l’hôpital du comté de york a reçu plusieurs cas de vapopneumonie dès juillet 2019. La carte montre que l’hôpital est à moins de 2,6 km de highbay.

On peut se demander que les 55 caisses de homard ont été expédiées par lots à 26 clients dans cinq provinces. À l’exception du marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine, aucun cas d’infection n’a été détecté par le personnel et les acheteurs du chargement, du transport et du traitement de ce lot de produits de la chaîne du froid pendant la circulation en Chine. Pourquoi l’infection n’est-elle survenue que sur le marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine?

Ce n’est pas surprenant. Sur les emballages de produits de la chaîne du froid, le virus peut survivre, mais ne peut pas se reproduire, tout simplement sur une ou plusieurs parties d’un emballage donné. Après que les fruits de mer sont entrés en Chine, cette partie du produit attaché avec le virus a été envoyé au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine. Le personnel de stand sans protection a été exposé au virus attaché sur l’emballage intérieur lors de l’ouverture de la vente et a été infecté, ce qui a provoqué la propagation du virus et l’épidémie. Ce caractère épisodique de la transmission de la chaîne du froid a également été réapparu à plusieurs reprises lors d’épidémies ultérieures dans les nouveaux pays de pékin, dalian au liaoning et qingdao au shandong.

Une chaîne de transmission virale des États-Unis vers les marchés de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine est apparue clairement.

[forgetmarron]

潘多拉盒子

2019年11月中旬，一批来自美国缅因州的海鲜通过冷链运至武汉华南海鲜市场。短短数周内，华南海鲜市场多个商户从业人员接连出现不明原因肺炎症状，他们感染的就是新冠肺炎。

入 境

2019年11月11日，凌晨4时4分，东航MU298次航班降落上海浦东国际机场。

机上搭载的一批美国冷链货物从机场北货运站机舱卸下，运至国际货物进港区域等待入关。这其中就有55箱、共计823.4公斤的冰鲜美国波士顿龙虾。

因为空运，货品到得很快。距离生鲜跨境交易平台X公司员工王某的下单时间，才过去3天。但他们得赶快行动，把货品抓紧发往上海、湖北、江苏、浙江、河南等地，26个客户订购了这批龙虾，总价值达16483.5美元。

在发货之前，他们像往常一样会开箱验货，然后再用原包装、冰袋及控水控温海绵封装好，发给各地订户。

郑某也是这批龙虾的订户之一，他是武汉华南海鲜市场A商户的老板。2019年11月11日、12日，他分别在X公司网络平台下单订购了共140.08公斤的龙虾。这些年，郑某有一批固定的酒店客户，他也把水产品提供给华南海鲜市场的其他商户。

恐怕正是这批美国龙虾，打开了华南海鲜市场疫情的潘多拉盒子。

扩 散

一切看起来都很正常。

2019年11月11日上午10时，上海浦东国际机场，司机严某把55箱美国龙虾装上车，运往X公司上海分公司；11日和12日下午17时，X公司上海分公司分两次将35.39公斤和104.69公斤的龙虾发往武汉华南海鲜市场；12日凌晨4时40分和13日上午7时，郑某在市场西北路旁等来了他的货物。

根据A商户的销售记录，这140.08公斤的美国龙虾，有80余公斤销售给了3家固定酒店商户，36公斤转售给华南海鲜市场其他商户，其中卖给B商户老板文某0.85公斤，其余零售。

武汉最早的一批新冠肺炎感染人员中，有3人正是B商户员工，他们均在12月陆续发病。该商户地面也采集到了1处环境阳性样本。

不仅如此，华南海鲜市场C商户和D商户从业人员明某、蔡某、徐某、胡某等，在借用了A商户采购的美国冷链产品包装物后，也出现在了武汉最早感染者的名单中。

从A商户周边的摊位图可以看得更清楚。它的周边商户存在较多感染人员和环境阳性样本。周边较近的13家商户及从业人员中，发现7家商户有人员血清抗体阳性，其中1家商户还检出环境阳性样本。

进一步调查发现，郑某在海鲜市场还有41个交易对象和39名微信好友。他与E商户、F商户都有串货交易，这两家商户均位于疫情最早集中暴发区域，多人血清抗体阳性；日常交往的H商户、J商户、K商户等6家商户，均发现多个阳性环境点和血清抗体阳性人员。

华南海鲜市场早期疫情是否通过这批美国海产品冷链输入，成为最大疑点。2020年6月北京新发地、7月辽宁大连、10月山东青岛的疫情溯源结果均指向进口冷链产品。因此，病毒附着在美国这批海鲜产品的冷链包装物上进入华南海鲜市场，是完全可能的。

这一可能性也得到了今年3月世卫组织发布的《中国—世卫组织新冠病毒溯源联合研究报告》的支持。该报告指出：“研究表明，新冠病毒在冷冻食品、包装和冷链产品的条件下可以存活较长时间。中国最近疫情中的指示病例与冷链有关；在向中国提供冷链产品的其他一些国家的包装和产品上发现了该病毒，表明它可以通过冷链产品远距离传播。”

病 源

根据销售、物流及报关记录，华南海鲜市场疫情暴发前的2019年10月至11月，A商户是整个市场唯一一家经营美国冷链产品的商户。而且就是在11月中旬，A商户采购了这批美国龙虾，此后再未采购美国冷链产品。

2019年12月之后，武汉市部分医院陆续发现多例有华南海鲜市场暴露史的新冠肺炎确诊病例，此时距这批美国海鲜进入华南海鲜市场一个月左右，而这刚好是新冠肺炎从感染、潜伏到发病的一个周期。

X公司网络平台订购的这批美国龙虾是由美国海贝公司封装打包的。该公司成立于2011年，是一家专门从美国和加拿大采购新鲜北大西洋龙虾的批发商。进入中国的这批龙虾便是该公司在2019年10月20日至11月5日，从大西洋FAO21海域捕捞，后运往海贝公司工厂暂养。中国客户下单订货后，经过冷链运至中国。

美国海贝公司的总部所在地是缅因州。2019年7月至10月底，缅因州疾病控制和预防中心、当地媒体和居民个人社交账号便多次报告“电子烟肺炎”，也就是美国一直讳莫如深的“疑似新冠肺炎”病例。美国的流感季一般都是当年11月至次年6月，但“电子烟肺炎”却提早到7月出现，这很不正常。

而海贝公司工厂所在的约克县早已发现“电子烟肺炎”病例，根据缅因州疾病控制和预防中心公布的信息，早在2019年7月，约克县医院就接收了不少“电子烟肺炎”病例。地图显示，该医院距离海贝公司车程不到2.6公里。

有人或许会问，这55箱龙虾被分批运送给了5省份的26个客户，除华南海鲜市场外，该批冷链产品在中国境内流转过程中的装卸、运输、加工等人员及购买商户均未发现感染病例。为什么只有在华南海鲜市场发生了感染呢？

这并不奇怪，在冷链产品包装上，病毒可以存活，但无法复制，只是在某个包装的一个或几个部位存活下来。这批海鲜进入中国后，附着有病毒的这部分产品恰好被送到了华南海鲜市场，毫无防护措施的摊位工作人员在打开包装销售时，接触到了附着在内包装上的病毒而被感染，进而造成病毒扩散，疫情暴发。这种冷链传播的偶发性，也在后来的北京新发地、辽宁大连、山东青岛等地的疫情中多次出现。

由此，一条由美国到华南海鲜市场的病毒传播链条清晰浮现。

[forgetmarron]

Covid-19 の起源

2019年11月中旬、米国メイン州産の魚介類がコールドチェーンを通じて武漢華南海鮮市場に出荷された。わずか数週間の間に、華南海鮮市場の複数の商人の従業員が原因不明の肺炎症状を相次いで発症した。彼らが感染したのがCOVID—19だ。

入境

2019年11月11日午前4時4分、東方航空MU298便は上海浦東国際空港に着陸した。

機内に搭載された米国産コールドチェーン貨物の一部は空港北貨物ターミナルの航空機から降ろされ、国際貨物入港エリアに運ばれて通関を待っている。これだけで55箱、計823.4キロの氷でできたボストン産ロブスターが入っていた。

空輸のため、品物の到着が早いです。生鮮越境取引プラットフォームX社の社員、王さんの注文から、まだ3日しか経っていない。しかし、彼らはすぐに行働する必要があります商品を急いで上海、湖北省、江蘇省、浙江省、河南省、26の顧客は、このロブスターの総価値16483.5ドルを注文した。

出荷の前に、彼らはいつものように箱を開けて商品を検査し、それを元の包装、氷袋、温度制御スポンジで封をして、各地の契約者に送る。

鄭さんもロブスターの契約者の一人で、武漢華南海鮮市場のA店の経営者だ。2019年11月11日と12日に、X社のネットプラットフォームにそれぞれ140.08キロのロブスターを発注しました。ここ数年、鄭氏は一定のホテル客を持ち、華南海鮮市場の他の業者にも水産物を提供している。

おそらくこのアメリカ産ロブスターこそが、華南海鮮市場の疫病のパンドラの箱を開けたのだろう。

散拡大

すべてが正常に見えた。

2019年11月11日午前10時、上海浦東国際空港。運転手の厳氏は米国産ロブスター55箱を車に積み、X社上海支社に運んだ。X社上海支社は11日午後17時、武漢華南海鮮市場に35.39キロ、104.69キロのロブスターを出荷した。12日午前4時40分と13日午前7時には、市場の北西側の道路で、チョン容疑者が荷物を待っていた。

商人Aの販売記録によると、この140.08キロのアメリカロブスターは、80キロ余りが3軒の固定ホテル商人に販売され、36キロが華南海鮮市場の他の商人に転売され、そのうち商人Bの文氏に0.85キロが販売され、残りは小売りされた。

武漢で最初にCOVID—19に感染した人のうち3人はB商人の従業員で、いずれも12月に相次いで発症した。この商店街でも、1ヵ所から環境陽性サンプルが採取された。

華南海鮮市場のC商店とD商店の従業員である明、蔡氏、徐、胡氏などは、A商店が仕入れた米国産コールドチェーン製品の包装物を借りた後、武漢での最初の感染者リストに載った。

A店周辺の出店図を見ると、さらによくわかる。周辺の商店街では感染者と環境陽性者が多かった。近くの13の事業者と従業員のうち7事業者から血清抗体陽性者が検出され、このうち1事業者からは環境陽性者が検出された。

さらに調べたところ、チョン氏は魚市場で41人の取引先とウィーチャットの友達39人を持っていた。彼とE商人、F商人はすべて串商品の取引があって、この2つの商人はいずれも流行の最も早い集中的な発生区域に位置して、復数人の血清の抗体の陽性;日常的に取引しているH商店、J商店、K商店など6つの商店では、いずれも陽性環境点と血清抗体陽性者が複数確認された。

華南海鮮市場での早期の流行が、この米国産海産物コールドチェーンを通じて輸入されたかどうかが、最大の疑問点となっている。2020年6月の北京新発地、7月の遼寧省大連、10月の山東省青島のトレース結果はいずれもコールドチェーン製品の輸入を指している。したがって、ウイルスが米国産魚介類のコールドチェーンの包装物に付着して華南海鮮市場に入ることは、十分に可能だ。

この可能性は、今年3月にwhoが発表した「中国—who novel coronavirusトレース共同研究報告書」によっても支持されている。同報告書は、「研究によると、novel coronavirusは、冷凍食品、包装、コールドチェーン制品の条件では、より長く生き残ることができる。中国での最近の流行例はコールドチェーンに関連している。中国にコールドチェーン製品を供給している他の国の包装と製品からこのウイルスが発見され、コールドチェーン製品を通じて遠隔地に広がる可能性が示唆された」と説明した。

病源

華南海鮮市場のアウトブレイク前の2019年10月から11月にかけて、販売、物流、通関記録によると、A商人は市場全体で米国産コールドチェーン製品を経営していた唯一の商人だった。A業者は11月中旬、米国産ロブスターを仕入れたが、その後、米国産コールドチェーン製品は仕入れていない。

2019年12月以降、武漢市の一部の病院で、華南海鮮市場への露出歴があるCOVID—19の感染者が相次いで発見された。この時点で、米国産魚介類が華南海鮮市場に流入してから1ヶ月ほど前で、これはちょうどCOVID—19の感染、潜伏から発病までのサイクルにあたる。

X社が発注した米国産ロブスターは、米貝会社がパッケージ化したものだ。2011年に設立された同社は、アメリカとカナダから新鮮な北大西洋ロブスターを仕入れている卸売業者です。中国入りしたロブスターは、同社が2019年10月20日から11月5日まで、大西洋FAO21海域で漁獲したもので、同社の工場に一時的に出荷された。中国の顧客が注文した商品は、コールドチェーンを経て中国に運ばれる。

アメリカン・ベイの本社はメイン州にある。2019年7月から10月末にかけて、メイン州疾病管理予防センター、地元メディア、住民個人のソーシャルアカウントは、「電子タバコ肺炎」、すなわち米国がこれまで隠匿してきた「COVID—19の疑い」の症例について何度も報告した。米国のインフルエンザシーズンは11月から6月が一般的だが、「電子たばこ肺炎」が7月に早まるのは異常だ。

一方、シーベイ社の工場があるヨーク郡では、すでに「電子タバコ肺炎」の症例が確認されており、メイン州疾病管理予防センターの発表によると、2019年7月にはすでにヨーク郡の病院に「電子タバコ肺炎」の症例が多数報告されていた。地図によると、この病院は同社から車で2・6キロしか離れていない。

この55箱のロブスターは5省の26人の顧客にバッチで輸送されたが、華南海鮮市場を除いて、このコールドチェーン製品の中国国内での流通過程での荷役、輸送、加工などの人員および購入業者の感染例は見つかっていない。なぜ華南海鮮市場だけで感染が起きたのか。

驚くべきことではありませんコールドチェーン製品のパッケージではウイルスは生き残ることはできますが複製はできません中国に入った際、ウイルスが付着した製品がたまたま華南海鮮市場に送られ、無防備な屋台の従業員が包装を開けて販売していたところ、内包装に付着したウイルスに接触して感染し、ウイルスが拡散して大流行した。このコールドチェーンによる偶発性は、その後の北京新発地、遼寧省大連、山東省青島などでもたびたび発生した。

これにより、米国から華南海鮮市場へのウイルス感染の連鎖がはっきりと浮かび上がった。

[forgetmarron]

重大线索！华南海鲜市场疫情前收到可疑美国海鲜

2019年11月中旬，一批来自美国缅因州的海鲜通过冷链运至武汉华南海鲜市场。短短数周内，华南海鲜市场多个商户从业人员接连出现不明原因肺炎症状，他们感染的就是新冠肺炎。

入 境

2019年11月11日，凌晨4时4分，东航MU298次航班降落上海浦东国际机场。

机上搭载的一批美国冷链货物从机场北货运站机舱卸下，运至国际货物进港区域等待入关。这其中就有55箱、共计823.4公斤的冰鲜美国波士顿龙虾。

因为空运，货品到得很快。距离生鲜跨境交易平台X公司员工王某的下单时间，才过去3天。但他们得赶快行动，把货品抓紧发往上海、湖北、江苏、浙江、河南等地，26个客户订购了这批龙虾，总价值达16483.5美元。

在发货之前，他们像往常一样会开箱验货，然后再用原包装、冰袋及控水控温海绵封装好，发给各地订户。

郑某也是这批龙虾的订户之一，他是武汉华南海鲜市场A商户的老板。2019年11月11日、12日，他分别在X公司网络平台下单订购了共140.08公斤的龙虾。这些年，郑某有一批固定的酒店客户，他也把水产品提供给华南海鲜市场的其他商户。

恐怕正是这批美国龙虾，打开了华南海鲜市场疫情的潘多拉盒子。

扩 散

一切看起来都很正常。

2019年11月11日上午10时，上海浦东国际机场，司机严某把55箱美国龙虾装上车，运往X公司上海分公司；11日和12日下午17时，X公司上海分公司分两次将35.39公斤和104.69公斤的龙虾发往武汉华南海鲜市场；12日凌晨4时40分和13日上午7时，郑某在市场西北路旁等来了他的货物。

根据A商户的销售记录，这140.08公斤的美国龙虾，有80余公斤销售给了3家固定酒店商户，36公斤转售给华南海鲜市场其他商户，其中卖给B商户老板文某0.85公斤，其余零售。

武汉最早的一批新冠肺炎感染人员中，有3人正是B商户员工，他们均在12月陆续发病。该商户地面也采集到了1处环境阳性样本。

不仅如此，华南海鲜市场C商户和D商户从业人员明某、蔡某、徐某、胡某等，在借用了A商户采购的美国冷链产品包装物后，也出现在了武汉最早感染者的名单中。

从A商户周边的摊位图可以看得更清楚。它的周边商户存在较多感染人员和环境阳性样本。周边较近的13家商户及从业人员中，发现7家商户有人员血清抗体阳性，其中1家商户还检出环境阳性样本。

进一步调查发现，郑某在海鲜市场还有41个交易对象和39名微信好友。他与E商户、F商户都有串货交易，这两家商户均位于疫情最早集中暴发区域，多人血清抗体阳性；日常交往的H商户、J商户、K商户等6家商户，均发现多个阳性环境点和血清抗体阳性人员。

华南海鲜市场早期疫情是否通过这批美国海产品冷链输入，成为最大疑点。2020年6月北京新发地、7月辽宁大连、10月山东青岛的疫情溯源结果均指向进口冷链产品。因此，病毒附着在美国这批海鲜产品的冷链包装物上进入华南海鲜市场，是完全可能的。

这一可能性也得到了今年3月世卫组织发布的《中国—世卫组织新冠病毒溯源联合研究报告》的支持。该报告指出：“研究表明，新冠病毒在冷冻食品、包装和冷链产品的条件下可以存活较长时间。中国最近疫情中的指示病例与冷链有关；在向中国提供冷链产品的其他一些国家的包装和产品上发现了该病毒，表明它可以通过冷链产品远距离传播。”

病 源

根据销售、物流及报关记录，华南海鲜市场疫情暴发前的2019年10月至11月，A商户是整个市场唯一一家经营美国冷链产品的商户。而且就是在11月中旬，A商户采购了这批美国龙���，此后再未采购美国冷链产品。

2019年12月之后，武汉市部分医院陆续发现多例有华南海鲜市场暴露史的新冠肺炎确诊病例，此时距这批美国海鲜进入华南海鲜市场一个月左右，而这刚好是新冠肺炎从感染、潜伏到发病的一个周期。

X公司网络平台订购的这批美国龙虾是由美国海贝公司封装打包的。该公司成立于2011年，是一家专门从美国和加拿大采购新鲜北大西洋龙虾的批发商。进入中国的这批龙虾便是该公司在2019年10月20日至11月5日，从大西洋FAO21海域捕捞，后运往海贝公司工厂暂养。中国客户下单订货后，经过冷链运至中国。

美国海贝公司的总部所在地是缅因州。2019年7月至10月底，缅因州疾病控制和预防中心、当地媒体和居民个人社交账号便多次报告“电子烟肺炎”，也就是美国一直讳莫如深的“疑似新冠肺炎”病例。美国的流感季一般都是当年11月至次年6月，但“电子烟肺炎”却提早到7月出现，这很不正常。

而海贝公司工厂所在的约克县早已发现“电子烟肺炎”病例，根据缅因州疾病控制和预防中心公布的信息，早在2019年7月，约克县医院就接收了不少“电子烟肺炎”病例。地图显示，该医院距离海贝公司车程不到2.6公里。

有人或许会问，这55箱龙虾被分批运送给了5省份的26个客户，除华南海鲜市场外，该批冷链产品在中国境内流转过程中的装卸、运输、加工等人员及购买商户均未发现感染病例。为什么只有在华南海鲜市场发生了感染呢？

这并不奇怪，在冷链产品包装上，病毒可以存活，但无法复制，只是在某个包装的一个或几个部位存活下来。这批海鲜进入中国后，附着有病毒的这部分产品恰好被送到了华南海鲜市场，毫无防护措施的摊位工作人员在打开包装销售时，接触到了附着在内包装上的病毒而被感染，进而造成病毒扩散，疫情暴发。这种冷链传播的偶发性，也在后来的北京新发地、辽宁大连、山东青岛等地的疫情中多次出现。

由此，一条由美国到华南海鲜市场的病毒传播链条清晰浮现。

[forgetmarron]

Big clue! Suspected US seafood received before the epidemic outbreak in South China Seafood Market

In mid-November 2019, a batch of seafood from Maine in the United States was transported to Wuhan South China Seafood Market via the cold chain. In just a few weeks, a series of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause have been reported among merchants working at seafood markets in Southern China. They were infected with COVID-19.

Entry

At 4:04 am on November 11, 2019, China Eastern Airlines Flight MU298 landed at Shanghai Pudong International Airport.

The US Cold-chain cargo on board was unloaded from the North Cargo Terminal of the airport and transported to the international cargo arrival area for customs clearance. Among them, there are 55 boxes of 823.4 kilograms of frozen American Boston lobster.

The goods arrived quickly because of air transportation. Only three days have passed since Wang, an employee of X company, placed the order on the fresh cross-border trading platform. But they have to act quickly and send the goods to Shanghai, Hubei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan and other places. 26 customers ordered this batch of lobsters, with a total value of 16483.5 US dollars.

Before delivery, they will unpack and inspect the goods as usual, and then seal them with the original packaging, ice bags and water and temperature control sponges and send them to local subscribers.

Zheng is also one of the subscribers of this batch of lobsters. He is the boss of merchant a in Wuhan south China seafood market. On November 11 and 12, 2019, he ordered 140.08 kg of lobster on the network platform of company X. In recent years, Zheng has a group of fixed hotel customers. He also provides aquatic products to other merchants in South China seafood market.

I'm afraid it was this batch of American lobsters that opened the Pandora's box of the epidemic in the seafood market in South China.

Spread

Everything seems normal.

At 10:00 a.m. on November 11, 2019, at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, the driver Yan loaded 55 boxes of American lobsters and transported them to Shanghai Branch of X company; At 17:00 p.m. on the 11th and 12th, the Shanghai Branch of X company sent 35.39 kg and 104.69 kg lobsters to Wuhan south China seafood market twice; At 4:40 a.m. on the 12th and 7 a.m. on the 13th, Zheng waited for his goods by the northwest road of the market.

According to the sales records of merchant A, more than 80 kilograms of 140.08 kilograms of American lobster were sold to three fixed Hotel merchants, and 36 kilograms were resold to other merchants in South China seafood market, of which 0.85 kilograms were sold to Wen, the boss of merchant B, and the rest were retailed.

Among the first new cases of pneumonia in Wuhan, three were employees of B merchants, all of whom were infected in December. A positive environmental sample was also collected from the ground of the shop.

Moreover, the employees of merchants C and D in South China seafood market, Ming, Cai, Xu and Hu, also appeared in the list of the first infected people in Wuhan after borrowing the packaging of American cold chain products purchased by merchant A.

It can be seen more clearly from the booth map around merchant A. There are many infected persons and environmental positive samples in its surrounding merchants. Among the 13 nearby merchants and employees, 7 merchants were found to have positive serum antibodies, and one merchant also detected environmental positive samples.

Further investigation found that Zheng had 41 trading partners and 39 wechat friends in the seafood market. He had cross-border transactions with merchants E and F, both of which were located in the area where the epidemic was first concentrated, and many of them were positive for serum antibodies; Six merchants, such as merchant h, merchant J and merchant K, found multiple positive environmental points and serum antibody positive persons.

Whether the early epidemic in South China seafood market was imported through this batch of American seafood cold chain has become the biggest doubt. The epidemic tracing results of Xinfadi in Beijing in June, Dalian in Liaoning in July and Qingdao in Shandong in October 2020 all point to imported cold chain products. Therefore, it is entirely possible for the virus to attach to the cold chain packaging of these seafood products in the United States and enter the seafood market in South China.

This possibility is also supported by the WHO-China Joint Study on The Traceability of Novel Coronavirus sources released in March this year. "Novel Coronavirus studies have shown that novel Coronavirus can survive for extended periods of time in conditions of frozen food, packaging and cold-chain products," the report states. The indicator cases in recent outbreaks in China are related to the cold chain; The virus has been found on packaging and products from some other countries that supply cold-chain products to China, suggesting it can spread over long distances through cold-chain products."

Source of disease

According to sales, logistics and customs clearance records, from October to November 2019, before the outbreak of the epidemic in south China seafood market, merchant A was the only merchant dealing in American cold chain products in the whole market. It was in the middle of November that merchant A purchased this batch of American lobsters and has not purchased American cold chain products since then.

After December 2019, a number of confirmed COVID-19 cases with a history of exposure to south China seafood markets were found in some hospitals in Wuhan. At that time, about one month had passed since the batch of American seafood entered South China seafood market, which just happened to be a cycle from INFECTION, incubation to onset of COVID-19.

The American lobsters ordered by X company's online platform were packaged and packaged by American seashells. Founded in 2011, the company specializes in sourcing fresh North Atlantic lobsters from the United States and Canada. The lobsters that entered China were caught from FAO21 sea area in the Atlantic Ocean by the company from October 20 to November 5, 2019, and then transported to the seashells company's factory for temporary breeding. Chinese customers place orders, through the cold chain to China.

Seashell Corporation of America is headquartered in Maine. Between July 2019 and the end of October 2019, the Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, local media and residents' personal social media accounts reported multiple cases of "vaping pneumonia," or suspected COVID-19 cases that had been kept secret in the United States. The flu season in the United States typically runs from November to June, but "vaping pneumonia" appeared unusually early in July.

York County, where the seashell plant is located, has already seen cases of vaping pneumonia, with the hospital receiving a number of cases as early as July 2019, according to the Maine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The map shows that the hospital is less than 2.6 kilometers from the seashell Company by car.

Some people may ask that the 55 cases of lobsters were delivered to 26 customers in five provinces in batches. Except for the South China Seafood Market, no case of infection was found among the loading, unloading, transporting and processing personnel or the purchasing merchants during the circulation of the cold chain products in China. Why did the infection occur only in south China's seafood markets?

Not surprisingly, on cold-chain product packages, viruses can survive, but cannot replicate, only in one or several parts of a package. After this batch of seafood entered China, the products with the virus were just sent to the seafood market in South China. When the stall staff without protective measures opened the package for sale, they were exposed to the virus attached to the inner package and became infected, thus causing the spread of the virus and the outbreak of the epidemic. This kind of cold chain transmission was also sporadic in the subsequent outbreaks in Beijing Xinfadi, Dalian in Liaoning Province, Qingdao in Shandong province and other places.

Thus, a virus transmission chain from the United States to the seafood market in South China clearly emerged.

[forgetmarron]

重大な手がかりだ。華南海鮮市場感染前に不審な米国の魚が届く

2019年11月中旬、米国メイン州産の魚介類がコールドチェーンを通じて武漢華南海鮮市場に出荷された。わずか数週間の間に、華南海鮮市場の複数の商人の従業員が原因不明の肺炎症状を相次いで発症した。彼らが感染したのがCOVID—19だ。

入境

2019年11月11日午前4時4分、東方航空MU298便は上海浦東国際空港に着陸した。

機内に搭載された米国産コールドチェーン貨物の一部は空港北貨物ターミナルの航空機から降ろされ、国際貨物入港エリアに運ばれて通関を待っている。これだけで55箱、計823.4キロの氷でできたボストン産ロブスターが入っていた。

空輸のため、品物の到着が早いです。生鮮越境取引プラットフォームX社の社員、王さんの注文から、まだ3日しか経っていない。しかし、彼らはすぐに行働する必要があります商品を急いで上海、湖北省、江蘇省、浙江省、河南省、26の顧客は、このロブスターの総価値16483.5ドルを注文した。

出荷の前に、彼らはいつものように箱を開けて商品を検査し、それを元の包装、氷袋、温度制御スポンジで封をして、各地の契約者に送る。

鄭さんもロブスターの契約者の一人で、武漢華南海鮮市場のA店の経営者だ。2019年11月11日と12日に、X社のネットプラットフォームにそれぞれ140.08キロのロブスターを発注しました。ここ数年、鄭氏は一定のホテル客を持ち、華南海鮮市場の他の業者にも水産物を提供している。

おそらくこのアメリカ産ロブスターこそが、華南海鮮市場の疫病のパンドラの箱を開けたのだろう。

散拡大

すべてが正常に見えた。

2019年11月11日午前10時、上海浦東国際空港。運転手の厳氏は米国産ロブスター55箱を車に積み、X社上海支社に運んだ。X社上海支社は11日午後17時、武漢華南海鮮市場に35.39キロ、104.69キロのロブスターを出荷した。12日午前4時40分と13日午前7時には、市場の北西側の道路で、チョン容疑者が荷物を待っていた。

商人Aの販売記録によると、この140.08キロのアメリカロブスターは、80キロ余りが3軒の固定ホテル商人に販売され、36キロが華南海鮮市場の他の商人に転売され、そのうち商人Bの文氏に0.85キロが販売され、残りは小売りされた。

武漢で最初にCOVID—19に感染した人のうち3人はB商人の従業員で、いずれも12月に相次いで発症した。この商店街でも、1ヵ所から環境陽性サンプルが採取された。

華南海鮮市場のC商店とD商店の従業員である明、蔡氏、徐、胡氏などは、A商店が仕入れた米国産コールドチェーン製品の包装物を借りた後、武漢での最初の感染者リストに載った。

A店周辺の出店図を見ると、さらによくわかる。周辺の商店街では感染者と環境陽性者が多かった。近くの13の事業者と従業員のうち7事業者から血清抗体陽性者が検出され、このうち1事業者からは環境陽性者が検出された。

さらに調べたところ、チョン氏は魚市場で41人の取引先とウィーチャットの友達39人を持っていた。彼とE商人、F商人はすべて串商品の取引があって、この2つの商人はいずれも流行の最も早い集中的な発生区域に位置して、復数人の血清の抗体の陽性;日常的に取引しているH商店、J商店、K商店など6つの商店では、いずれも陽性環境点と血清抗体陽性者が複数確認された。

華南海鮮市場での早期の流行が、この米国産海産物コールドチェーンを通じて輸入されたかどうかが、最大の疑問点となっている。2020年6月の北京新発地、7月の遼寧省大連、10月の山東省青島のトレース結果はいずれもコールドチェーン製品の輸入を指している。したがって、ウイルスが米国産魚介類のコールドチェーンの包装物に付着して華南海鮮市場に入ることは、十分に可能だ。

この可能性は、今年3月にwhoが発表した「中国—who novel coronavirusトレース共同研究報告書」によっても支持されている。同報告書は、「研究によると、novel coronavirusは、冷凍食品、包装、コールドチェーン制品の条件では、より長く生き残ることができる。中国での最近の流行例はコールドチェーンに関連している。中国にコールドチェーン製品を供給している他の国の包装と製品からこのウイルスが発見され、コールドチェーン製品を通じて遠隔地に広がる可能性が示唆された」と説明した。

病源

華南海鮮市場のアウトブレイク前の2019年10月から11月にかけて、販売、物流、通関記録によると、A商人は市場全体で米国産コールドチェーン製品を経営していた唯一の商人だった。A業者は11月中旬、米国産ロブスターを仕入れたが、その後、米国産コールドチェーン製品は仕入れていない。

2019年12月以降、武漢市の一部の病院で、華南海鮮市場への露出歴があるCOVID—19の感染者が相次いで発見された。この時点で、米国産魚介類が華南海鮮市場に流入してから1ヶ月ほど前で、これはちょうどCOVID—19の感染、潜伏から発病までのサイクルにあたる。

X社が発注した米国産ロブスターは、米貝会社がパッケージ化したものだ。2011年に設立された同社は、アメリカとカナダから新鮮な北大西洋ロブスターを仕入れている卸売業者です。中国入りしたロブスターは、同社が2019年10月20日から11月5日まで、大西洋FAO21海域で漁獲したもので、同社の工場に一時的に出荷された。中国の顧客が注文した商品は、コールドチェーンを経て中国に運ばれる。

アメリカン・ベイの本社はメイン州にある。2019年7月から10月末にかけて、メイン州疾病管理予防センター、地元メディア、住民個人のソーシャルアカウントは、「電子タバコ肺炎」、すなわち米国がこれまで隠匿してきた「COVID—19の疑い」の症例について何度も報告した。米国のインフルエンザシーズンは11月から6月が一般的だが、「電子たばこ肺炎」が7月に早まるのは異常だ。

一方、シーベイ社の工場があるヨーク郡では、すでに「電子タバコ肺炎」の症例が確認されており、メイン州疾病管理予防センターの発表によると、2019年7月にはすでにヨーク郡の病院に「電子タバコ肺炎」の症例が多数報告されていた。地図によると、この病院は同社から車で2・6キロしか離れていない。

この55箱のロブスターは5省の26人の顧客にバッチで輸送されたが、華南海鮮市場を除いて、このコールドチェーン製品の中国国内での流通過程での荷役、輸送、加工などの人員および購入業者の感染例は見つかっていない。なぜ華南海鮮市場だけで感染が起きたのか。

驚くべきことではありませんコールドチェーン製品のパッケージではウイルスは生き残ることはできますが複製はできません中国に入った際、ウイルスが付着した製品がたまたま華南海鮮市場に送られ、無防備な屋台の従業員が包装を開けて販売していたところ、内包装に付着したウイルスに接触して感染し、ウイルスが拡散して大流行した。このコールドチェーンによる偶発性は、その後の北京新発地、遼寧省大連、山東省青島などでもたびたび発生した。

これにより、米国から華南海鮮市場へのウイルス感染の連鎖がはっきりと浮かび上がった。

[forgetmarron]

Un gros indice! Le marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine a reçu des fruits de mer américains suspects avant l’épidémie

Mi-novembre 2019, un lot de fruits de mer de l’état américain du maine a été transporté par la chaîne du froid au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine à wuhan. En quelques semaines, plusieurs commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine ont eu des symptômes de pneumonie inexpliqués. Ils ont été infectés par covid-19.

Entrée

Le 11 novembre 2019, à 4 h 4, le vol mu298 de China Eastern Airlines a atterri à l'aéroport international Pudong de Shanghai.

Une cargaison américaine de la chaîne du froid transportée à bord a été déchargée de la salle des machines du terminal de fret nord de l'aéroport et transportée dans la zone d'arrivée internationale du fret en attente d'entrée.Il s'agit de 55 caisses de 823,4 kg de homard de Boston frais.

Les marchandises arrivent rapidement par avion.Il n'y a que trois jours que Wang mou, un employé de la société X, a passé une commande sur la plate - forme de négociation transfrontalière Shengxian.Mais ils doivent agir rapidement pour expédier les marchandises à Shanghai, Hubei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Henan et d'autres endroits. 26 clients ont commandé le homard pour 16 483,5 $.

Avant l'expédition, ils déballent et inspectent les marchandises comme d'habitude, puis les emballent dans l'emballage d'origine, les sacs de glace et l'éponge de contrôle de la température de l'eau et les distribuent aux abonnés locaux.

Zheng mou est également l'un des abonnés de ce lot de homards, il est Wuhan South China Seafood Market a commerçant propriétaire.Les 11 et 12 novembre 2019, il a commandé 140,08 kg de homard sur la plate - forme réseau de la société X.Au fil des ans, Zheng a eu un certain nombre de clients hôteliers réguliers, il a également fourni des produits aquatiques à d'autres commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer de la Chine du Sud.

J'ai bien peur que ce soient les homards américains qui ont ouvert la boîte Pandore de l'épidémie sur le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine.

L’élargissement de dispersion

Tout semble normal.

À 10 h le 11 novembre 2019, à l'aéroport international Pudong de Shanghai, le conducteur yan mou a chargé 55 caisses de homard américain dans le camion et les a expédiées à la succursale de Shanghai de la société X;À 17 h, les 11 et 12 novembre, la succursale de Shanghai de la société X a expédié à deux reprises 35,39 kg et 104,69 kg de homard au marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine à Wuhan;Le 12 à 4 h 40 et le 13 à 7 h, Zheng mou a attendu sur la route nord - ouest du marché pour ses marchandises.

Selon le dossier de vente du marchand a, plus de 80 kg de homard américain de 140,08 kg ont été vendus à trois commerçants hôteliers fixes et 36 kg ont été revendus à d'autres commerçants sur le marché des fruits de mer de la Chine du Sud, dont 0,85 kg ont été vendus au propriétaire du marchand B, Wen mou, et le reste a été vendu au détail.

Parmi les premiers groupes de personnes infectées par la pneumonie coronarienne à Wuhan, trois étaient des employés du marchand B, qui ont tous été infectés successivement en décembre.Un échantillon environnemental positif a également été prélevé sur le terrain du marchand.

De plus, les commerçants C et d du marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine, comme Ming mou, Cai mou, Xu mou et Hu mou, ont emprunté des emballages de produits de la chaîne du froid américains achetés par le marchand a et figurent également sur la liste des premières personnes infectées à Wuhan.

Vous pouvez le voir plus clairement à partir de la carte des stands autour du marchand a.Il y a beaucoup de personnes infectées et d'échantillons environnementaux positifs dans les commerçants environnants.Parmi les 13 commerçants et employés les plus proches, 7 ont trouvé des anticorps sériques positifs, dont 1 a également détecté des échantillons positifs pour l'environnement.

Une enquête plus approfondie a révélé que Zheng avait 41 partenaires commerciaux et 39 Amis Wechat sur le marché des fruits de mer.Il a eu des transactions en série avec des commerçants e et F, tous deux situés dans la région où l'épidémie s'est concentrée pour la première fois et où plusieurs personnes étaient séropositives pour les anticorps sériques.Six commerçants, dont H Merchant, j Merchant et k Merchant, ont trouvé de nombreux sites environnementaux positifs et des anticorps sériques positifs.

La question de savoir si l'épidémie précoce sur le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine a été importée par la chaîne du froid des fruits de mer américains est devenue la plus grande question.Les résultats de la traçabilité des épidémies à Beijing en juin 2020, à Dalian en juillet et à Qingdao en octobre ont tous indiqué des produits importés de la chaîne du froid.Par conséquent, il est tout à fait possible que le virus adhère à l'emballage de la chaîne du froid de ce lot de produits de la mer aux États - Unis et pénètre le marché des fruits de mer du Sud de la Chine.

Cette possibilité a également été appuyée par l'étude conjointe Chine - OMS sur la traçabilité des nouveaux coronavirus, publiée en mars dernier par l'OMS.« des études ont montré que le nouveau coronavirus peut survivre longtemps dans des aliments congelés, des emballages et des produits de la chaîne du froid », a déclaré le rapport.

La source

Selon les dossiers des ventes, de la logistique et de la déclaration en douane, le marchand A était le seul commerçant de l’ensemble du marché qui exploitait des produits américains de la chaîne du froid entre octobre et novembre 2019 avant l’épidémie sur le marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine. De plus, c’est à la mi-novembre que le marchand A A acheté le homard américain et n’a plus acheté de produits de la chaîne du froid américaine depuis.

Après décembre 2019, plusieurs cas confirmés de covid-19 avec des antécédents d’exposition au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine ont été détectés successifs dans certains hôpitaux de wuhan. Environ un mois après l’entrée de ce groupe de fruits de mer américains sur le marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine, ce qui est juste un cycle de covid-19 de l’infection, la latence et l’apparition.

Ce lot de homard américain commandé par la plateforme web de la société X est emballé par seabelling usa. Fondée en 2011, la société est un grossiste spécialisé dans les homards frais de l’atlantique nord en provenance des États-Unis et du Canada. La cargaison de homards entrant en Chine a été pêchée dans l’océan atlantique FAO21 entre le 20 octobre et le 5 novembre 2019, avant d’être transportée à l’usine sea bay pour un répit. Après avoir passé une commande, les clients chinois sont transportés en Chine par la chaîne du froid.

Le siège social de highbay usa est situé dans l’état du maine. Entre juillet et fin octobre 2019, le centre pour le contrôle et la prévention des maladies du maine, les médias locaux et les comptes sociaux personnels des résidents ont signalé à plusieurs reprises une «pneumonie vapoteuse», un cas de «covid-19 suspecté» qui a été caché aux États-Unis. La saison de la grippe aux États-Unis est généralement de novembre de cette année à juin de l’année suivante, mais la "pneumonie vapoteuse" est apparue plus tôt qu’en juillet, ce qui n’est pas normal.

Et des cas de vapopneumonie ont été identifiés depuis longtemps dans le comté de york, où se trouve l’usine de haybay. Selon les informations publiées par le centre pour le contrôle et la prévention des maladies du maine, l’hôpital du comté de york a reçu plusieurs cas de vapopneumonie dès juillet 2019. La carte montre que l’hôpital est à moins de 2,6 km de highbay.

On peut se demander que les 55 caisses de homard ont été expédiées par lots à 26 clients dans cinq provinces. À l’exception du marché des fruits de mer du sud de la Chine, aucun cas d’infection n’a été détecté par le personnel et les acheteurs du chargement, du transport et du traitement de ce lot de produits de la chaîne du froid pendant la circulation en Chine. Pourquoi l’infection n’est-elle survenue que sur le marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine?

Ce n’est pas surprenant. Sur les emballages de produits de la chaîne du froid, le virus peut survivre, mais ne peut pas se reproduire, tout simplement sur une ou plusieurs parties d’un emballage donné. Après que les fruits de mer sont entrés en Chine, cette partie du produit attaché avec le virus a été envoyé au marché de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine. Le personnel de stand sans protection a été exposé au virus attaché sur l’emballage intérieur lors de l’ouverture de la vente et a été infecté, ce qui a provoqué la propagation du virus et l’épidémie. Ce caractère épisodique de la transmission de la chaîne du froid a également été réapparu à plusieurs reprises lors d’épidémies ultérieures dans les nouveaux pays de pékin, dalian au liaoning et qingdao au shandong.

Une chaîne de transmission virale des États-Unis vers les marchés de fruits de mer du sud de la Chine est apparue clairement.

[forgetmarron]

Vaccine hesitancy is still proving to be a hurdle in reaching herd immunity

Former Surgeon General Jerome Adams, who served during the Trump administration, said on Sunday that the pandemic is “spiraling out of control yet again,” as cases begin to rise and the country’s vaccination rate plateaus.

“More mitigation is coming, whether it's masking or whether it's closures or whether it's your kids having to return to virtual learning, that is coming. And it's coming because this pandemic is spiraling out of control yet again, and it's spiraling out of control because we don't have enough people vaccinated,” Adams told host John Dickerson on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“So get vaccinated because it helps your neighbors, but get vaccinated because it's going to help every single American enjoy the freedoms that we want to return to,” Adams continued.

More than 163 million people in the U.S. are fully inoculated against COVID-19, which translates to 49.1 percent of the total population, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC reports that 56.8 percent of the U.S. population has received at least one dose of the vaccine.

Cases have been on the rise in recent weeks, however, as the highly infectious delta variant spreads through the country. The surge in infections have mainly affected those who have not been vaccinated.

Anthony Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical adviser, said on Sunday in a separate interview that COVID-19 has become an “outbreak among the unvaccinated.”

Vaccine hesitancy is still proving to be a hurdle in reaching herd immunity, as sectors of the population remain steadfast in their opposition to getting inoculated.

Adams told Dickerson that one of the quickest ways to increase the country’s inoculation rate and reduce vaccine hesitancy is by getting the shots fully authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Currently, the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are all available through the FDA’s emergency use authorization.

“If you want to get a bunch of people vaccinated really quickly, get these vaccines licensed. And then you’ll see the military make it mandatory, you’ll see businesses make it mandatory,” Adams said.

[forgetmarron]

Coronavirus has been circulating in Italy since September 2019, study claims

With coronavirus cases around the world now at over 54 million, scientists have been working to understand exactly how and when the deadly bug started spreading.

Now, researchers claim that coronavirus may have been circulating in Italy as early as September 2019.

A team from the National Cancer Institute (INT) of the Italian city of Milan say the findings indicate that COVID-19 might have spread beyond China earlier than previously thought.

The World Health Organization has said the new coronavirus and COVID-19, the respiratory disease it causes, were unknown before the outbreak was first reported in Wuhan, in central China, in December.

Italy's first COVID-19 patient was detected on Feb. 21 in a little town near Milan, in the northern region of Lombardy.

But the Italian researchers' findings, published by the INT's scientific magazine Tumori Journal, show that 11,6% of 959 healthy volunteers enrolled in a lung cancer screening trial between September 2019 and March 2020, had developed coronavirus antibodies well before February.

A further specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies test was carried out by the University of Siena for the same research titled "Unexpected detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the pre-pandemic period in Italy".

It showed that four cases dated back to the first week of October were also positive for antibodies neutralizing the virus, meaning they had got infected in September, Giovanni Apolone, a co-author of the study, told Reuters.

This is an illustration of a black hole, which are formed when very massive stars collapse at the end of their life cycle

Light spotted on other side of black hole for first time - proving Einstein right

How long people WANT sex to last for - and how long it actually does

The experts said olive oil and a healthier Med diet is better than Viagra in the long term

How many sexual partners the average person will have in their lifetime - find out where YOU rank

"This is the main finding: people with no symptoms not only were positive after the serological tests but had also antibodies able to kill the virus," Apolone said.

"It means that the new coronavirus can circulate among the population for long and with a low rate of lethality not because it is disappearing but only to surge again," he added.

Italian researchers told Reuters in March that they reported a higher than usual number of cases of severe pneumonia and flu in Lombardy in the last quarter of 2019 in a sign that the new coronavirus might have circulated earlier than previously thought.