gadabeckaser

[gadabeckaser]

The Great Benefits of Organic Food

Some great benefits of eating organic foods are numerous. With it becoming more and more popular to eat organically, it is becoming easier and a little more inexpensive to purchase organic foods. Local farmers' markets, health food stores, and even Walmart cater to those who eat organically. Normal crops mean the foods are grown in safe soil, without any additives or alterations. Organic livestock translates that the meats you eat have been fed organic ally and have had lived naturally (i. e., outdoor). While many meals are deemed "organic, " only those which meet the above criteria are stamped with the USDA approval for normal. In stores, you can be assured that foods with the USDA Organic sticker are at least ninety percent organic. Support nearby farmers Because most organic foods are grown and sold locally, it promotes and supports farmers inside your surrounding area. With a drastic drop in people living on farms, this helps keep the remaining farmers in business. Accommodating local farmers also encourages less government intervention in the foods you eat. By purchasing foods from organic maqui berry farmers, it sends a statement that you are willing to pay a little more in order to be healthy and refuse to have interference on what is usually sprayed on fruits and vegetables and fed to animals. Environment Organically grown foods also benefit our environment in many fundamental ways. One is it helps keep our water safe to drink. Water is the most important liquid on the earth, along with being vital to ensure its purity. When pesticides sprayed onto plants and medicated animals defecate, these harmful substances make their ways into the water system. With organic farming, this does not occur, and plays an important a part in keeping water clean for our ecosystem. It follows if our water is affected by chemical processes, then the dirt is as well. If the soil is contaminated, then whatever feeds off of it or is grown in it maintain a pool of likelihood of being polluted. This also means organic foods make it safer for wildlife. Higher nutrient levels Whether or not natural foods have higher nutrient levels than treated foods is a highly debated topic. However , many treated foodstuff give the appearance of being more nutritious because they are bigger. Do not be deserved by size, though. Most treated fruits and vegetables are generally larger due to a higher content of water. While organics are smaller, they still are packed with nutrients-just without the deceptive water size. Absence of food colorings Many treated foods have vibrant, healthy-looking colors. However , you mouthful into them only to find that they are either over-ripe or under-ripe. In these cases, food colorings have been added to the berries or vegetables to make them appear healthy and convince you to purchase them. Organic foods do not have food colorings. What you see sitting in front of you is exactly what you are getting. Better taste If you are only going for taste, organically grown foodstuffs have a much richer taste than treated foods. Most organic foods are fresh because they are usually locally produced. The majority of people will agree that fresh foods are hands down significantly more lush and tasty than preserved foods. And, because organic foods do not have all the additives and are instead grown as they were originally meant to be, they tastes better. No pesticides Even after you have washed or even peeled foods which have been previously treated with pesticides, there may well still be a remnant of pesticides left which can affect you. The Environmental Working Group has studied the effect with pesticides on foods and has determined the top twelve fruits and vegetables which are the most effected by pesticides. In order from optimum, they are apples, bell peppers, carrots, celery, cherries, imported grapes, kale, lettuce, nectarines, peaches, pears, and strawberries. Pesticides build up inside your body and create health problems, which can progressively grow as you eat more and more non-organic foods over time. Problems which can occur include birth defects, and headaches. Babies, children, and pregnant women are especially prone to pesticide-related health conditions. Because pesticides add stress to already weak immune systems (such as in babies or pregnant women), the opportunity to get sick is much easier. Pregnant women also need to be aware that pesticide-treated foods which they eat can also be transmitted to their child even though pregnant or nursing. By eating organic foods, you can rest assured that they are free from pesticides. No antibiotics Antibiotics may be injected into animals. These antibiotics can then be transferred into your body when you eat the meat. A bombardment of antibiotics actually makes your body immune to the effects of antibiotics. Consequently, when you need to take antibiotics to struggle disease, your body is unable to use them. Organic farmers who raise cattle or chickens or other animals for meats feed their animals natural foods the way they were originally meant to eat, and they do no inject antibiotics. Accordingly, meats coming from organic farms are free from antibiotics. No hormones To meet the high demand for meat, commercial, nonorganic farms give their animals hormone-injected feed in order to make them grow bigger and faster. While this may work for output, it translates into your children's hormones maturing faster. Click here Gad Abeckaser As organic farmers do not use antibiotics, they also allow their own animals to grow naturally. No problems with hormones with organic meat. More antioxidants nonorganic foods have fewer antioxidants than organic foods. This is because the longer foods sit out in the store, the less antioxidants left. Natural foods are fresh and must be eaten faster. Consequently, they are higher in antioxidants. Antioxidants help boost your quality of life, including fighting heart disease. There are even studies which seem to indicate that antioxidants can fight cancer. Reduce health threats Obviously, if there are not pesticides, hormones, and antibiotics treated into your foods, the benefits of avoiding these products will assist you to avoid many debilitating-if not deadly-health risks. While many people will argue there is not that big of a difference with health risks between organic and treated foods, there have not been definite studies to show that the treated substances place in our foods are not detrimental in the long run. By purchasing organic foods, you steer clear of the possibility of harming your family's and unfortunately your health. Knowledge Knowledge is power. By knowing what we are purchasing, by what we are putting into our bodies, we now have the ability to choose how to protect our health and lifestyles.

[gadabeckaser]

Could GMO Foods Possibly End Our Lives?

Permit food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food" ~ Hippocrates We'll explore the Pro plus Cons of GMO foods which are genetically modified by introducing organisms DNA from other species. There are a large number of opinions from PhDs, Environmentalists, and farmers now up in arms and the producers like Monsanto and their own close alliance with the government and the Food and Drug Administration who tell us that GMO foods are which means that safe, there is no reason to even disclose GMO foods on the packaging of the foods we buy and use on a daily basis. Estimates are that 60% to 70% of processed foods on U. S. grocery shelves get genetically modified ingredients. The most common GMO foods are soybeans, maize, cotton and rapeseed oil which includes most of the packed foods containing corn and/or high-fructose corn syrup found in almost all of the breakfast cereals, most snacks, and even your sodas we drink. It also includes foods from GMO soybeans which include some baby foods and many foods created from cottonseed and canola oils are likely to have genetically modified ingredients. America is the Only Country does Not require GMO Foods Labeling The real question is why is America is the only country in the world that doesn't require the labeling from GMO foods or better, why it is even necessary for the chemical company Monsanto to genetically modify meals that are the very life blood of our existence, and most importantly will they then be safe to consume? The Engineering Process in the GMO Foods Genetic Engineering Genetic Engineering starts with some thought to take a cold water flounder gene and insert it into a tomato crop so the crop could withstand colder temperatures. If this sounds like Frankenstein it is, but even worse because Frankenstein was all one species, but what the heck, if it will work, what could the problem be? The next step is even scarier because of the only way to get the DNA of the flounder gene on the tomato gene is what? What is good at invading cells? Bacteria and Viruses are masters at it. The idea took Monsanto 12 years, but they finally found a soil bacterium that was naturally resistant to Monsanto's pesticide Roundup, a chemical poison which is a slight variation of their WW ll lethal nerve gas and Vietnam's Solution Orange. Once they recombine the bacterial DNAs, this recombined bacterial DNA is able to penetrate the cell walls. Additional two options of inserting this recombined DNA into the plant's genes uses electric shock to crack tell you lot more cell walls with tiny holes to pass through and then there's the Gene Gun which blasts the recombined DNA within the cells on minute particles of gold. The Frankenstein GMO Foods Crop This creation of the Frankenstein head with their cells implanted with recombined DNA leads us to the component that is so terrifying that its acceptance by the government of Washington DC could be nothing more than irresponsibly self-serving. Bit, it gets even more threatening because so as to activate the recombined DNA, a separate promoter gene is also implanted to use like an ignition switch for the target gene. This promoter gene which is typically a Cauliflower Mosaic Virus may not always limit itself to just having an effect on the intended recombined gene. Because of the Mosaic Virus' strong promoting influence, there could be unintended genes switched on with accidental disastrous consequences, like cancer cells or other disfiguring life threatening growths or illnesses. GMO Foods Protection Relies on a Wait and See Approach There is a real possibility that the introduction of foreign virus' and bacteria DNA with plants and animals could turn against us because this GMO foods technology is at such a nanoscopic proportions that most of the technology relies on a wait and see approach. Absolutely no one yet knows the long range effects about using bacteria and virus DNA to genetically engineer plants so that they could tolerate the deadly poison Roundup. There is also a wait and see approach to the effects of this poison falling to the ground entering the groundwater and environment since runoff, especially now that farmers are realizing that the more they use Roundup, the more they have to use it in increasing amounts. Could GMO Foods become even More Terrifying? Are you thinking how could anything you've just read get hold of any more terrifying? It's because these Frankenstein staple GMO foods crop seeds are patented and owned by the Monsanto Corporation, therefore each planting season, the farmers must buy these "patented" seeds from Monsanto, and the mega gallons of Roundup they need to spray the Monsanto crops as they grow. The Monsanto Corporation strictly forbids the economizing of seeds as farmers have always done and tracks down and sues the farmers who make an attempt to. In fact , Monsanto sets an annual budget of $10 million and a staffs 75 farm detectives devoted just to investigating and prosecuting farmers. There are many cases each year of harassment against farmers over alleged unauthorized entry to their GMO seed products even if they blew in on the wind from another farm. This is Not the First Time the us government has Lied to Us We've been told since the middle of the last century that adding Fluoride to our mineral water would prevent tooth decay and it was not harmful to humans. It has taken us seventy plus years to realize which usually we've been lied to. There is in fact , no improvement in preventing tooth decay and there is accumulating data connected with its harmful and devastating effects on humans. Fluoride is not technically a GMO Food because it does not genetically modify the water we drink, but it is an added process making many wealthy. It does nothing of what that they promised and is destroying the lives of so many living in areas of fluoridated waters compared to those areas and areas that have refused to fluoridate their waters. Are you Familiar with Today's Experts Disclaimers on Fluoridation? Paul Connett, PhD in biochemistry remarked that when historians come to write about this period, they will single out fluoridation as the single biggest mistake in public areas policy that we've ever had. Of course, that may soon be overshadowed by GMO Foods. David Kennedy, DDS as well as President International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology commented that in the history of the planet water fluoridation is the single largest case of scientific fraud, promoted by the government, supported by taxpayer dollars, aided and abetted by the ADA and the AMA, Interesting because now we have the FDA promoting the acceptance of GMO foodstuff. Charles Gordon Heyd, MD, and President of the AMA was appalled at the prospect of using water for a vehicle for drugs. He felt that fluoride is a corrosive poison that would produce serious effects on a longer range basis and to use water this way was simply deplorable. L. Alesen, MD and President of the Carolina Medical Association advocates that no physician in his right mind would ever hand to his affected individual a bottled filled with some dangerous drug with instructions to take as much or as little of it as he anticipated. He is concerned as to why the Public Health Service is engaged upon their widespread propaganda program to insist which will communities do exactly that? Dr . Alesen was sure that the purpose of administering fluoride was not to render the water furnish pure and potable but to contaminate it with a dangerous and toxic drug for the purpose of administering mass relief medication to the consumer without the slightest regard to their age or physical condition. Albert Schatz, PhD Nobel Laureate for locating streptomycin has expressed his concern that fluoridation is the greatest fraud that has ever been perpetrated on people and emphasizes it has been perpetrated on more people than any other fraud has. Of course fluoridation might become a second rate theft as people can substitute fluoridated water and toothpaste, but not so easily substituted is virtually every GMO nutrition product on the shelves. Dean Burk, PhD with the National Cancer Institute has shocked us with the statistic the fact that more people have died in the last 30 years from cancer connected with fluoridation than all the military deaths with the entire history of the United States. As amazing as this statistic is, it's nothing compared to the fact that they nevertheless fluoridate water, or that virtually everyone in America is becoming ill and obese and that may just be the GMO foodstuffs contribution. An Environmental Protection Agency scientist, Dr . Robert Carton in 1999 discovered that fluoridation was the greatest condition of scientific fraud of this century, if not of all time. Dr . Carton now needs to come forth with his opinion with GMO foods. Monsanto's Defense of Genetically Engineering our Food Crops GMO companies like Monsanto have comments for GMO Foods which are introduced here, but don't they eerily come across like those "claims" that fluoridated water was not harmful and will prevent dental decay which we now know to be totally deceitful? Monsanto claims who today's global population nearing seven billion people and growing an adequate food supply might become a problem accordingly their GMO foods are needed to meet this demand in a number of ways: In Pest resistance, growing GMO foods which include Bt corn can help eliminate the application of chemical pesticides like Roundup but Bt corn is still a GMO Food with the pesticide on the inside of it. They use a toxin produced by the Bacillus thuringiensis bacterium which works being a pesticide. Monsanto started inserting these genes which code for the toxin directly into the genetic code of the ingrown toenail and must also include a section of promoter gene code which would encourage the corn to produce the toxin. They also introduce a marker gene which could be used to track and identify modified corn. For Herbicide tolerance, Monsanto contains a strain of soybeans genetically modified to be unaffected by their herbicide product Roundup, By weakening plants together with promoting disease, the chemical glyphosate known as Roundup opens the door to many problems in the environment according to Dr . Put on Huber of Purdue University. The use of glyphosate Roundup is reported to develop 40 diseases in crop plants and this number continues to grow as people come to more recognize the association between glyphosate and disease. To become Condition resistance against the many viruses, fungi and bacteria that cause plant diseases, therefore it makes sense that Monsanto attempt to create plants they could genetically engineer to resistance to these diseases. If this were really possible, they'll likely could similarly genetically engineer all of us so that we too become resistant to all of our diseases. How can they be ready to genetically engineer plants to resist diseases when the genetic engineering itself is known to introduce diseases? To develop Cold threshold using an antifreeze gene from cold water fish that has been introduced into tobacco and potato plants, but that still hasn't addressed the issue that the fish genes are introduced into the transgenic plant genes using the recombined DNA from viruses and bacteria. Any unintended consequences from just this are in addition to possible unintended outcomes from the additional necessary promoter "kick-starting" gene that no one is yet sure what else this promoter gene can kick start inside the human consumer of these GMO foods. Creating Drought tolerance and Salinity tolerance factories that can withstand drought and a high salt content in the soil and groundwater is a great goal but, here way too farmers have already been doing this for centuries through selective breeding without genetically engineering them. Most importantly, Monsanto is not claiming these that they've even been able to do this making it part of that blue sky they're painting to have us think they really are on some successful path. To increase Nutrition because malnutrition is common everywhere people aren't eating healthy and additionally especially in poorer countries who primarily rely on a single crop such as rice for their main staple of eating plan. Monsanto wants to genetically engineer rice for example to contain additional vitamins and minerals to produce a kind of an all-in-one plant that sounds desirable. But again, recombining Virus and bacteria DNA and inserting them with the promoter and sign transgenic genes into plants we eat so that even if they could obtain these doubtful results, will they get safe to digest into human bodies without unintended undesirable side effects? And do you believe we need more Pharmaceutical drugs? Medicines and vaccines are costly to produce but even more costly to market as seen by the countless number of pharmaceutical promotions on TV twenty-four-seven. Monsanto is working to develop tomatoes and potatoes as another one dose fits all, when you need it or not delivery system in the same way we poison ourselves with that one dose of fluoride matches all in every drop of water and toothpaste. The same GMO food plant dosage would forced upon little ones, toddlers, teenagers, adults and grandparents alike who all happen to eat a tomato or have pasta for supper, and what pharmaceutical company doesn't want this? We could start with the use of engineered plants and trees to remove and neutralize contaminants in polluted soil or groundwater known as Phytoremediation. Soil and groundwater pollution is certainly a problem all around the world. Poplar trees have been genetically engineered to help clean up heavy metal pollution from contaminated soil and here is an individual place if it works, would be applauded because we don't normally ingest trees. GMO Foods History The main commercially grown genetically modified GMO foods crop came about in the early 1990s with a tomato named the FlavrSavr by Calgene, which is a California company with Monsanto ownership since 1996. The genetic engineering altered the tomato so that it took longer to decompose except it did not sell well therefore last long on the supermarket shelf as it was unacceptably bland. Many of our Government's own scientific advisers were concerned over possible negative health side effects, but this did not prevent or even delay the government from approving the GMO tomato and further decided that GMO foods in general would not require pre-market approval even though Dr Arpad Pusztai of the Rowett Research Institute in 1996 published his research suggesting that GMO potatoes modified with a snowdrop plant insecticide gene were toxic to help rats in feeding trials. A Personal Perspective on GMO Foods From a personal perspective aren't we shocked, appalled and angry that this information has been purposely concealed from us by those government agencies charged with safeguarding us? On the positive note is the awaking awareness to the dangers of GMO foods as witnessed by the substantial growing number of documentaries which are found on all of the free and paid video networks like Netflix for example. Our meals supply and what we eat is today probably the number one subject for documentaries, each one a different perspective on the best way dangerous the Genetic Engineering of our crops are. Much of them are on the complete lack of any real validation other than for the Monsanto Corporation to patent and own our food seeds thereby forcing farmers to buy from their site each planting season which now also comes to require more and more of its toxic chemical Roundup to make them increase. GMO Foods do not have to be labeled in the USA because Monsanto has fought hard to prevent labeling laws. This is certainly alarming since most of the processed foods on the grocery shelves and freezers either are or contain GMO substances. And we're the bad parents in this country because many nations like the European Union, Japan, China, Korea, Queensland and New Zealand all have mandatory GMO Foods labeling so that they won't unknowingly serve GMO foods on their children. Monsanto's GMO Foods Perspective A revolving door exists between Monsanto and our government regulatory in addition to judicial bodies making their self-serving fraudulent decisions. In 1992, then Vice President Dan Quayle announced a FDA's anti consumer right-to-know policy which stated that GMO foods need NOT be labeled nor safety-tested. It was over the objections of many prominent scientists like Arpad Pusztai and Gilles-Eric Seralini who publicized their alarming explore revealing the severe damage to monkeys and lab rats fed GMO foods including: sterilization, cancer, miscarriages, allergen hypersensitivity, seizures, and death. Monsanto also had strong ties to the George W. Bush administration including John Ashcroft, Donald Rumsfeld, Ann Veneman, Tommy Thompson and Justice Clarence Thomas who was a Monsanto Corporation attorney within the 1970s appointed to the Supreme Court by George Bush Sr. in 1990 where he wrote the majority viewpoint in the 2001 Supreme Court decision that paved the way for Monsanto to patent and own seeds With another example, Monsanto lobbyist Michael R. Taylor left Monsanto to work for a law firm gaining FDA approval for Monsanto's artificial growth hormone in the 1980s. He then became the deputy commissioner of the FDA from 1991 to 1994 when rBGH was granted approval. He was appointed Senior Adviser to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner on food safety in 2009 by President Barack Obama. Dr . Michael A. Friedman was a deputy commissioner of the FDA before he was hired as a senior vice president of Monsanto. Linda J. Fisher was an assistant administrator at the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) before becoming a vice president at Monsanto from 1995-2000. Fisher then became the Deputy Administrator of the EPA in 2001. The most devious of these intertwining relationships might be the former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld under both President Ford and President George Bush. He was the chairman and chief executive officer of G. D. Searle & Co. a pharmaceutical corporation which Monsanto purchased in 1985 like some ghoulish plan to generate profits first by sickening us with GMO Foods and then reaping the pharmaceutical profits on the back side. In July 2008, Monsanto announced its options to raise the average price of their GMO corn varieties $95-100 per bag, a staggering 35%, to top $300 a bag even though a 1999 review of Roundup Ready soybean crops found that compared to the top conventional varieties, they will actually had a 6. 7% lower yield. Mr. Fred Stokes of the Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) describes the implications for today's farmers noting how this absurd $100 price increase on a farmer which farms 1, 000 acres for example , for a gross increased cost of more than $40, 000. And yet, there is the real quite possibly lower yield so , where is any scientific basis to justify this price hike holding true with regard to other GM crops as well? In just 2 years from 2006 to 2008, the average price for soybean seed, the main GMO Foods crop in the country has risen by more than 50%, from $32. 30 to $49. 23 each and every planted acre. Just about any food we buy containing oils is either going to be Monsanto GMO soy, Monsanto GMO canola, or Monsanto GMO cottonseed oil. That bottle may read "pure vegetable oil" but will likely be 100% GMO soy. Even the "olive oil" mayonnaise lists GMO soy as the second ingredient after mineral water. We already know that organic hemp oil for example , would be a far safer GREENER plant to make these food products using with a reputation that is actually recognized to promote health as opposed to weakening it. GMO Soy protein is an unlabeled component in a large variety of the foods you may unknowingly believe safe such as salad dressings, soups, imitation meats, drink powders, nondairy creamers, frozen desserts, whipped topping, breads, taco shells, cheeses, breakfast cereals, pastas, and even puppy foods and infant formulas. Conclusion: If supermarket foods were labeled "GE" or "GMO Foods" they would take a seat on the shelves forever as has been proven outside the USA where there are labeling laws Isn't this an easy issue to see? The Monsanto attorney Justice Clarence Thomas becomes a Supreme Court Judge and then writes that Monsanto can patent and own our food crops? The former Monsanto lobbyist Michael R. Taylor becomes all the Senior Adviser to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner on food safety. A deputy commissioner in the FDA, Dr . Michael A. Friedman was hired as a senior vice president of Monsanto. An assistant owner of the EPA, Linda J. Fisher became a vice president at Monsanto from 1995-2000 to then grew to be the Deputy Administrator of the EPA in 2001. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was the chairman along with CEO of G. D. Searle & Co. a pharmaceutical company which Monsanto purchased in 1985. Using just this partial list of top Monsanto executives rotating back and forth between the FDA, the federal government and the Monsanto Corporation, just how can we still be expected to believe that they have our best interest over their own in mind? How could there not come to be overt conflicts of interests? It is OK to be very Afraid Doesn't all of this new technology come with questions and even fear? What are the real risks of these yet to be known experiments on nature? What forth coming effects might this have on the environment? Aren't there serious health concerns consumers of altered GMO food should be aware of? Is this approach Frankenstein technology of recombinant DNA really beneficial for humans in any way? Aren't you at all concerned that the runaway weight problems and disease growing in this country is in direct proportion to the Frankenstein GMO foods being secretly deceived with us? An obvious problem with pest-resistant and herbicide-resistant plants is the strong selective pressure in that habitat which could very likely cause an evolution of similarly resistant insects and thereby nullify the effects of the bacteria, plant and pet transgenic food crop. As the spraying of herbicides becomes more frequent as farmers are now experiencing with Roundup, the surrounding weeds could also develop a resistance. This would naturally cause a further increase in the Roundup dosage and frequency or maybe a change in herbicide to another more hideous toxin surely in development. No one is yet sure whether the pests resistant characteristic of these GMO crops could be adopted into the surrounding weeds causing strains of them to become resistant and much more prolific. It can even get way more Convoluted and Scary Since the insect-resistant plants can cause increased death of it's familiar pest, couldn't that eliminate competition for the minor pests to then have them become a major problem? Or, maybe couldn't insect-resistant plants cause their familiar pest population to shift to another plant crop that was once unthreatened by them? These unintended effects could multiply out much further. A study of Bt crops showed that will unfortunately beneficial insects who prey on familiar crop pests were also naturally exposed to harmful quantities of Bt. We could now understand realistic possibilities for the effects to continue to reach further up the food web to eventually influence plants and animals consumed by humans.