gigantic-spider

[gigantic-spider]

the weirdly vengeful and petty tones aborted babies take in pro-life propaganda images are so funny like this passive aggressive "was it worth it mommy?" and "it's a shame you can't join me in heaven mommy 😔" like do you ever wonder if you were aborted for a reason you little bitch ass baby

[gigantic-spider]

“Women don’t have rights in Iran, they are homophobic in Iran!”

A black woman’s dying body was used to incubate a fetus because the state said so and the Supreme Court, regurgitating debunked talking points, ruled that trans kids could be denied gender affirming care that is proven to save lives. Does that justify a foreign power bombing New Jersey indiscriminately? Like some of y’all don’t give a fuck about LGBTQ Iranians or women in that country because I never saw a people get free through just having their shit blown up

[gigantic-spider]

The other night husband and I were watching a documentary about the yeti where they were doing DNA analysis of samples of supposed yeti fur, and every one of them came back as bears.

Anyway, the next night we watched a thing about some pig man who is supposed to live in Vermont. People said it had claws and a pig nose but walked upright like a man. Now, I happen to know that sideshows used to shave bears and present them as pig men. So every piece of evidence they gave of this monster sounds to me like a bear with mange.

So now the running joke in our house is that everything is bears. Aliens? Bears. Loch Ness monster? Bear. Every cryptozoological mystery is just a very crafty bear.

Bears. They’re everywhere. Be wary. Anyone or anything could be a bear.

[gigantic-spider]

Okay, so you understand that doctors lie about everything to serve their capitalist masters, but you're still a fan of them injecting untested foreign materials into babies??

hell yeah man lets pump those babies full of crude oil see what happens

[gigantic-spider]

guy who’s seen 1 thing: omg just like riverdale

guy who’s seen 100 things: everything is special in its own way. it’s unfair to compare media because it removes nuance and simplifies plots that can’t exist outside of the internal and external factors that created them.

guy who’s seen 1000000 things: omg just like riverdale

[gigantic-spider]

There's nothing wrong with being a sex worker, or with enjoying sex work

[gigantic-spider]

that “presidential alert: the girls are fighting” image was literally made for this exact moment it’s almost too perfect

[gigantic-spider]

I think a lot of autistic taking-things-literally goes under the radar because what the diagnostic tests and shit ask about is not what that generally looks like in an adult and often not in kids either and much more importantly it’s not what generally actually causes problems in real life instead of being irritating for caretakers or funny to bullies or easy to diagnose

I have absolutely no issues understanding metaphors or idioms. When someone says their heart is on their sleeve they mean they’re emotionally expressive and openly display their feelings, not that they have a chunk of cardiac tissue on their shirt. I very rarely have issues with sarcasm. I sometimes have issues telling when someone who’s said something mean is about to say “just kidding”, but tbh I think that’s more on them than me.

BUT

My grandmother asked me “Do you know when the trash was taken out last?” and I said “I think Eliot took it out yesterday” and a few hours later she yelled at me for “not taking out the trash when I asked you to” and I was like???? You didn’t ask me????

I dread filling out forms and am crap at filling out diagnostic tests or personality quizzes because there are always questions I don’t know the exact answers to (how am I supposed to know what day I got dental surgery seven years ago?) or don’t understand exactly what they’re asking or the wording’s unclear and they could mean this or the wording says this but I’m pretty sure what they actually meant was this and should I answer what they said or what they meant, and how does everyone else just whip through the form when surely they can’t know all the answers either? Does everyone else remember the day they got dental surgery seven years ago?

I get tangled up by bureaucracy because the rules on the website say that for this you need that and for that you need the other and for the other you need something else for which you need the first thing, and I go in circles for hours or days or weeks or months or years because their stated rules say there is no way to get what I need, and when I talk to somebody else they’re like “just call them?” and I’m like “how could that help? the rules say that what I’m trying to do is impossible”

And all of that? That’s how “taking things literally” ACTUALLY affects your life as an adult. It’s not “haha you think ‘getting under your skin’ means parasites”. It’s “you have real difficulty functioning in the world because everyone else is conveying things through implication and assuming that you know that rules are flexible and questions are approximate and you’re supposed to lie on job applications, and you don’t”.

[gigantic-spider]

If we wanted to engage in nuance (lol, lmao) on the "are audiobooks reading" debate, we really do need to bring literacy, and especially blind literacy, into the conversation.

Because, yes, listening to a story and reading a story use mostly the same parts of the brain. Yes, listening to the audiobook counts as "having read" a book. Yes, oral storytelling has a long, glorious tradition and many cultures maintained their histories through oral history or oral + art history, having never developed a true written language, and their oral stories and histories are just as valid and rich as written literature.

We still can't call listening in the absence of reading "literacy."

The term literacy needs to stay restricted to the written word, to the ability to access and engage with written texts, because we need to be able to talk about illiteracy. We need to be able to identify when a society is failing to teach children to read, and if we start saying that listening to stories is literacy, we lose the ability to describe those systemic failures.

Blind folks have been knee-deep in this debate for a long time. Schools struggle to provide resources to teach students Braille and enforcing the teaching of Braille to low-vision and blind children is a constant uphill battle. A school tried to argue that one girl didn't need to learn Braille because she could read 96-point font. Go check what that is. The new prevalence of audiobooks and TTS is a huge threat to Braille literacy because it provides institutions with another excuse to not provide Braille education or Braille texts.

That matters. Braille-literate blind and low-vision people have a 90% employment rate. For those who don't know Braille, it's 30%. Braille literacy is linked to higher academic success in all fields.

Moving outside the world of Braille, literacy of any kind matters. Being able to read text has a massive impact on a person's ability to access information, education, and employment. Being able to talk about the inability to read text matters, because that's how we're able to hold systems accountable.

So, yes, audiobooks should count as reading. But, no, they should not count as literacy.

[gigantic-spider]

Did you know that most of my games on itch can be printed at home?

I like doing with other games as a nice alternative to reading on a screen or having a less expensive version of a fancier print.

Check em out!

[gigantic-spider]

hrt saves trans lives

[gigantic-spider]

They don’t tell you this but in the United States there is an extremely low chance to encounter a vehicle shaped like a hotdog

[gigantic-spider]

🦇Service Mindset🦇

Don’t be rude to whoever has the midnight shift at McDonalds

[gigantic-spider]

To my uk trans people and allies out there.

[gigantic-spider]

Having an abusive parent is kinda funny in retrospect like mommy why do you have beef with me im 4 i love you

[gigantic-spider]

People are really determined to confuse cause and effect with the "cishet men in queer spaces" thing. The most healthy spaces might be more likely to include cishet men (whether as allies or eggs or whatever), but not every healthy space will have cishet men and not every space with cishet men is healthy! Crappy toxic queer spaces are perfectly capable of having crappy toxic cishet men in them. Why is this concept so hard for everybody?

This too is an important way to look at it. And like, it's not automatic but cishet men too can bring their own issues into a queer community in a way that can make it less safe for the queer people in it. Is the solution to that to ban all cishet men from queer spaces? Nah. But like. Could we maybe consider not talking about cishet men like they're mandatory for a healthy queer space?

Also if I may I literally saw someone say that "cishet men are often the most denigrated people within queer spaces" and at that point I was like okay bye. Literally some "cishet men are actually the queer people of queer people" shit.

[gigantic-spider]

by Laerte Coutinho