gobind-631 - Tumblr blog

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

Ek din ki baat hai ..ek Mahatma ji mile the..isi eatery main mile the..

Inka zikr maine pehle bhi kar rakha hai..yaad hai..

Yeh Mahatma ji hote hai..phir bhi politics vagera main kaafi dilchaspi vegera lete hue kai baar dikhai dete hai..

Ek din ki baat hai.. unhone khud mere se kaha tha…ki ve ek secularist kisam ka mizaj rakhte hai..toh naturally ..iske chalte(aisi soch ke chalte)…ve ek kattar congressi bhi hote hai..

Jaise hi inhone yeh sab mujhse kaha..main sochne laga..yeh ek badhiya mauka maloom hota hai..naseeb/kismat se iss kisam ke/aise mauke ki prapti hui hai..chalo kyon na inhi se/inse hi discuss kar li jaye/inki rai/opinion le li jaye..inn conspiracy theorist bhai sahab ke dwara kahi gayi uss proposed/speculative model wali baat ko lekar..[Ji haan..Mahatma ji eatery main hi mile the.. pehele bhi aksar milte rehte the..lekin inhone pehli baar admit kiya tha ki ve congress ko khule aam endorse karte hai.. toh humne bhi socha..mauka achcha hai..kyon na inn political models ko inhi ke dwara test/analyse/validate vagera karaya jaye..yeh dekhne ke hisab se ki ve kitna Ittefaq rakhte hai(ki ve concur karte bhi hai..ya bilkul hi nahi karte)..inn conspiracy theorist bhai sahab ke dwara ki gayi unki(uss din wali)unn sab baaton se..]

Bhailog ..uss world engineering wale din..humne sabhi political ideologies ko discuss kar rakha tha… toh unhi sab baton ko (lagbhag verbatim) pesh kardiya tha maine..inke (Mahatma ji ke samne)..

Woh kya kehte hai.. aadmi wohi sab dekhta hai..joh woh darahsal dekhna chahata hai..hai na?..youn keh lo ki..savan ke andhe ko toh sab hara hi hara nazar aata hai..

Maine sabhi political ideologies ke pros n cons ko rakha tha inke samne..lekin inhone woh hi dekha joh ve dekhna chahte the..secularist hote hai..toh naturally isi mental conditioning ke hi chalte/tehat ve yeh sab keh rahe the ab/kehne lage the ab shayad ..(below):

Yeh sab sunte hi ve turant kehne lage..

Mahatma ji:Yeh greed/fear/hate/ignorance kiske hathyar hote hai..aap ko maloom toh hoga hi na..ji haan shaitan ke hote hai..

Sunne main aaya hai..shaitan/satan/devil hi aise hathiyar ka aksar istamal kiya karta hai..apne subjects ki sankhiya ko badhapane ke hisab se..(taki aise log Bhagwan se door aur uske nazdeek aa sake)…

Yeh regimes jinki aap charcha kar rahe ho..darahsal unki koi galti nahi..

Agar aap ke andar fear/hate/ignorance/greed nahi hota..tab inka isstamal bhi nahi kiya ja sakta tha..inke dwara..hai na?yeh regimes sirf stimuli/stimulus hi toh supply karti rahti hai..from time to time..ie..aapke andar chupe hue in kamzoriyon ko/avguno ko bahar nikalpane ke intention/hisab se..(taaki inka istamal karte hue..koi fyada liya jaa sake)..agar yeh avgun aap ke andar nahi hote..toh iska istamal bhi nahi kiya ja sakta tha..hai na..?…

Mahatmaji(continuing):Joh vyakti(wittingly/ya unwittingly).. iss model ko serve kar raha hai..woh darahsal satan/shaitan/devil ko hi serve kar raha hota hai..

*****

Inn weapons ko lekar inhone yeh wali tippini ki thi(above)..haha..

“Arre Mahatma ji..yeh sab kaisi/kis kisam ki baatien karne lage ho aap..”..main yeh soch raha tha..haha.

**********

Mahatma ji(continuing):

Mahabharat ka yuddh yaad hain na aap ko..

Woh bade bade maharathi..woh mahaan dhurandhar..yeh sab ke sab …kaise sab kuch samajhte/dekhte/mehsoos karte hue bhi (kaise)chup reh gaye the ..aur na sirf itna hi..balki inhone toh beinsaafi karne walon ke saath khade rahne ko bhi theek samajh liya tha/beinsaafi karne walon ke saath khade rehne ka bhi nirnay le liya tha..

Krishn ji kehte hai Kurukshetra ke maidaan main..”inn sabhi ke chup reh jane ke/aisa faisle lene ke koi na koi karan toh zaroor rahe honge..lekin iss sab se hame koi farak nahi..

Jiss jiss ne bhi..iss kisam ka/aisa faisla liya hai.. ..meri nazaron main toh woh usi waqt khatam ho chuka hai..bas/matr ab uski deh ka chootna baaki reh gaya hai..joh/yeh ab hoga..”(Aur aage jaake aisa/yeh sab hua bhi)

Aap iss Mahabharat ke yudh ko..iss nazariye se bhi dekh sakte ho ..ki yeh darahsal ek chchatni thi..yani ki Krishn ji dwara rachi gayi (yeh)ek kisam chchatni thi..

Yani ki ..bure log ..aur aise logon ka sath dene walon ko(ie burai ka sath dene walon ko)..ek saath khatam kiye jaane ka ..Swayam Krishn ji dwara racha gaya..ek (bohot hi perfect kisam ka)plan tha ..

[Enmasse selection and elimination(of nasty ppl)..is wat he (probably)means when he chooses to use this word “chchatni” ..I suppose..(main bhi pehli baar hi sun raha tha..iss shabd ko/iske ka istamal ko)]

Mahatma ji(continuing): Jab aap sab kuch samajh kar bhi chup reh jaate ho..kuch nahi kehte..tab aap darahsal apni zameen/mitti ke saath bohot badi nainsaafi kar rahe hote ho..you r ineffect abandoning ur country..in its darkest hour/phase..abandonment of worst kinds/variety..can call dis one..

Citizenry..democracy ki custodian hoti hai..aapne toh woh sab le liye..joh uss desh ki freeness of structure ki vajah se aap ko naseeb hua hai/aap ko uplabdh ho rakha hai..aur jab ab aap ke ajmayish ki baari aayi..tab aapne apne desh se muh hi pher liye hai..aise karne par aap khud kya ho jaate ho zara sochna iske bare main..

When u do dis ..u r ineffect..forever foregoing ur right to b ever born in a free country..in ur next birth(ie..if there’s ever going to b any for u at all..in d first place)..isse hi shayad kehte hai mitti ka naseeb nahi hona..

**Aur ek aur baat..jitna bada woh vyakti hota ..uski saza bhi utni hi badi hoti hai..Kyon ki aise vyakti ke paas na hi sadhan ki kami hoti hai..aur na hi samajh ki kami ..phir bhi woh aise kar raha hota hai..

Woh Palestine/Iran/Afghanistan/Ukeraine/Burma..vegera ..jaise ..aaj aise kai mulk hai..zara jaake kabhi wahan ke logon se puchna..unki tadap ke baare main..phir jaake aap ko samajh main aa jaye shayad …jab woh aap se kehenge..ki azadi ke liye hum ab kya kuch karne ko tayyar nahi nahi..hum jaan gawane ko bhi tayyar baithe hai ab..taaki hamari aane wali generation khul kar sans le sake..bas hamara yehi sapna hai ki hamara desh ab Azad ho jaye..aisi oppressive taquaton se..

Aapne dekha hoga..kitne log har saal maare jaate hai..illegally migrate karne ki koshish mai..Kyon?..yeh desperation hi hai na inka..yeh soch rahe hai..ab hum bilkul hi nahi jee sakte..jaha hum paida hue hai..

****

[***Mildly right se far right/authoritarian kinda setup main leke jane wali baat par inhone yahan par ..ek lamba chauda sa ..jazbaat se bhara bhashan ..mere muh par de mara tha..haha..]

****

Main sochne laga..yahan par ek Congressi bol raha hai..(koi)Mahatma ji nahi bol rahe..manlo jaise ki inhone bilkul hi patti chada li ho ..apni aankhon par..

Apne iss ideological conditioning ke chalte..inhone bhi sirf aur sirf wohi dekha hai/usi ko dekhna theek samjha..joh woh dekhna chahete hai..itni saari conditioning ho chuki hai inki..ab yeh kai ke Mahatma ji..khair..

Maine toh sabhi political ideologies ke pluses minuses wali baat ki thi..lekin yeh toh sirf isi ideology ki baat chchedne ko tayyar the..shayad ve iss rt wing/far rt wali model se ittefaq rakhte hai..lekin saath main shayad ve yeh bhi kehna chah rahe the ki ..citizenry bhi kahi na kahi doshi hoti hai..jab jab woh apni zimmedarion se chookti hai..

**Ab inhe itni si baat samajh main nahi aa rahi ki logon ki apni apni political leanings hoti hai..kuch log purntha (poori tarah se)..iss political ideology main vishwas rakhte hai…iss main galat kya hai..bataiye toh zara..main streamed hai..yeh political ideology duniya ke kaafi saare deshon main ..hai na..logon ki apni apni choice hai..ve apni iss choice ko exercise karpane ka haq rakhte hai..khamakha..pata nahi kya kya kehte jaa rahe hai jazbaat main aa kar..

*****

Bhaiog unhone yeh wali baat ki thi..”citizens supposed to be custodians of democracy”..toh maine issi baat ko ek AI tool main paste kar diya tha..kya kehta hai tool?output kya hoga?..main yeh dekhne ko utsuk tha..

Toh kuch iss kisam ka raha tha output..(below)..

“The phrase "citizenry being custodian of democracy" reflects the concept that the general population of a democratic country (the citizens) hold the responsibility of safeguarding and maintaining the principles and practices of democracy. This includes participating in elections, being informed about public issues, respecting the rule of law, and protecting the rights and freedoms of themselves and others. It underscores the idea that democracy thrives on active, informed, and engaged participation from its citizens, who act as stewards to ensure its health, longevity, and effectiveness. Essentially, it suggests that the strength and sustainability of a democracy depend significantly on the active involvement and vigilance of its citizens.”

**Isi output ko jab maine Mahatma ji ko dikhaya..ve ekdum exicited se hone lage..kehne lage..”ekdum sahi..ekdum sahi..yehi toh main kehna chah raha tha”…

Phir maine unse keh hi diya..(jaate jaate)..”Mahatma ji..ek aur baat..yeh idiom..”mitti bhi naseeb nahi hogi”..iska matlab woh nahi hota hai..joh aap samajh rahe hai shayad..(jahan tak meri jankari hai)..”

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

Pls note(yeh walla pehle post karna bhool gaya tha..khair ab kar raha hoon)..

Stuff to follow..(also all those previous parts..dat have recently posted)think of ‘em as scribbles(rough kinda notes..i mean..wid probably plenty of room for correction(s) here/there..(for eg…grammar related corrections..n similar such stuff …)

Rough sort of work..rough coz have been written on d fly(dis 1 too has been similarly written)..all these 16 parts..n also never been revisited (wid an aim/eye towards wanting to correct stuff/so can come across stuff dat probably calls for/requires some kind of a rectification )even once..

Ideally/as a rule..I try n revisit stuff dats been written by me..at least once..ie.. b4 posting it out..(ie..wanting to correct mistakes/errors dat may have inadvertently happened..errors here cud b spelling related /grammar related.. etc..cud even b content related sometimes)..

But dis time round have on purpose avoided doing dis(dis revisiting bit.. I mean)..

Why u ask?…”Coz Gobind Ji desires/wants it dis way..dis time round”..

Am frankly not in d know why he desires/wants it dis way..not my place to question him..so shall go along wid watever he desires/wants..

[Sirf itna hi nahi bhailog..Gobind ji ab yeh bhi keh rahe the ki “aap ko ab ..in 16 parts wale piece ke liye..koi achcha sa..ek apt kisam ke title ka bhi chunav karna hoga.

..bas phir kya tha.. yeh sunte hi..maine unse usi waqt pooch liya tha..

“One Big (Royal Kinda) Dump”.. yeh wali title kaisi/theek lag rahi hai aap ko..zara batayega…apt hai?..

Yeh sunte hi..veh muskurate hue kehne lage..“Ekdum sahi.. ekdum sahi… mann prafullit ho utha hai....yehi rakhna.. bas yehi rakhna…tathasthu!!!..

[Hum jab Gobind ji ko khush karte hai.. phir uske aage aur kuch karne ko khaas bachata nahi hai waise..kaafi sundar dikhte hai ve…muskurate hue..(dekho toh jaano)]…

Waise kuch kuch places main ..mere dwara likhi gayi text ke kuch sections ko ..maine ek AI tool ke dwara parse karte hue..uske output ko yaha par paste kiya hua hai....

Yeh sirf aur sirf isiliye kiya hai kyon ki veh yeh bhi chahte the ki .. iss piece ke ek bade hisse ko ..Good Friday se lekar Easter ke aas paas tak poste kiya jaye..(pata nahi kyon.. ve aisa chahte hai)..

Toh bhailog Jahan jahan parse kiya gaya hai..wahan sirf grammar related errors ko rectify karpane ke hisab se kiya gaya hai..(time constraint laga diya gaya tha isiliye)..[original (on d fly wale)core content ko retain kiya hai.. usmain koi changes nahi..(aur na hi parsing ki vajah se kuch extra text ko add kiya gaya hai)

Jan main hi rough tarike se sab already likh liya gaya tha.

**Baad main.. (much later) ..correct karke (wherever required..dat is)..(aur correct order main bhi).. sab kuch phir post krdunga..

[Time hai toh hi padhna bhailog..waise mujhe farak nahi.. koi padhe ya na padhe (not being rude here honestly.. only wanting to save u all some time dats all)hum toh bas isiliye likhte/post karte hai..kyon ki Gobind ji aisa karne ko kehte rehte hai.. bas yeh baat hai..aur kuch nahi]

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

Previous walla [Section 4,Part 5.1] tha…

**Ek achchi khasi cheez ko barbaadi main laga dene wali insaanon ki iss ajeebo gareeb fitrat/propensity ki main baat kar raha tha..

Conspiracy theorist ki yeh wali baat bilkul sahi hai..main bhi maanta hoon ki tech ka gazab misuse hota hai jab veh Propaganda facilitators/agents matr(hi)main reduce hokar reh jaate hai…

Obviously sabhi political parties ke log aise tools ko propaganda vegera ke liye deploy karte rehte hai.

********

….”As an aside”..it continues from previous..

[Section 4,Part 5.2]

Raw/rough types wala ek footnote ..(yeh wali baat(below)bhi kahi thi unhone(uss din)..main toh bhool hi gaya tha..khair..)

In a country where d electoral processes/d apex court/d lower courts have all been already/completely compromised(by d ruling regime in dat country)..one can then say..there’s virtually nothing by way of democracy dats left anymore in dat unfortunate country .

When u end up demolishing these two sacrosanct institutions..wat u then have in effect/effectively achieved is ..u basically have managed to hack democracy at its (very)roots(ie..have managed to hack it ..where it counts/matters/impacts d most(since r vital safeguards of democracy ..these two institutions..I mean))..in dat unfortunate country..

[Obviously not all rt wing /far right kind of regimes indulge in dis kind of a thing]

Aspect of dis model(where all those electoral processes have already been completely/totally compromised by a regime(Not all regimes indulge in dis kind of a thing..btw..want to make dis absolutely clear):

Conspiracy theorist:Wherever/in which ever country..dis kind of an unfortunate thing may have already come to pass/transpired/happened:

(For eg.. these recent Pakistan elections..lots of questions being raised..with regards to d results of these elections..those Iranian elections..Russian elections under Putin..d Belarus/Turkey/North Korea/Hungary..etc..elections..much has already been written as regards d nature of electoral processes being followed in these country..some even calling ‘em absolutely rigged[To be honest..don’t really know d truth of these allegations].

So ..here ..in such a model mounted country (ie..where the election processes have already been completely compromised)..one can witness d citizenry of dat country often complain dat d election results r a foregone conclusion..coz these results have all been already fixed..

(Russian elections se pehle Al jazeera ke ek news item main aise claims ko maine bhi dekha hua hai..lekin main sure nahi hoon..kyon ki Putin ji kaafi popular bhi maloom hote hai apne desh main)..”its all pre decided/predetermined..just a charade being carried out..out here..in d name of elections”..they say.

Conspiracy theorist(continuing):So in such a country..d daily doling out ..of dat three pronged propaganda material..by d regimes prop mach..(ie d 1 dat gets doled out by d prop mach on a daily basis to somehow/anyhow win d day for d regime…in d country’s citizenry eyes.(Right uptil dat big election day.. dis kind of a material doling out business/strategy is followed by d prop mach.. have mentioned all dis already ..if u remember..?))..dis/it still happens..

Why u ask?… why d need..when d results r all fixed ..n all dat?

Toh bhai aap ka question ho sakta hai.. jab yeh log jeetne hi wale hai..tab iss sab ka kya matlab..

Bhai sahab..matlab hota hai..inn impending /fixed kinda results ki (citizenry ki nazaron main) acceptance/acceptability ko lekar(ie ..acceptance of those impending fixed kinda results..in d citizenry eyes..is wat am talking about here)..

Aisa kiya jaata hai(aise propaganda material ko churn out kiya jaata hai)raat din ..iss prop mach ke dwara..[So r able to/can pave way for d acceptance(ie.. from point of view of d acceptability)of those impending/fixed results in d citizenry’s eyes(as well as in d eyes of d international audience/observers)—taki log results dekh ke/kar bole ..bhai ..yeh toh hona hi tha na..yeh log jeetne hi toh wale the na..mahaul bhi tha..bas wohi hua hai..aur kya…kuch bhi toh surprising nahi hua yahan par…haha..

“Not only should we b winning(dis obviously is going to happen)..is also paramount/important..dat we should also b seen to b winning..each day..of r present/ongoing tenure..all leading up to dat big election day”.. yeh hai ..aise regimes ka mantra..jahan par electoral processes ki integrity bilkul hi khatam ki jaa chuki hai..mere hisab se toh.

Aise regime ne darahsal puri hi tarike se iss model ko mount kar liya hota hai..apne iss unfortunate desh main..

Aisi regimes aap dekhoge ..kabhi kabhi ek aad elections harte bhi hai..(yeh sirf ek drama hota hai..taaki aise lage ki electoral processes ki integrity ekdum intact hai)..jahan jeet nahi sakte wahan jeet jaana shaq paida karne jaisa hota hai.

Woh kya kehte hai.. kahi pe nighaen kai pe nishana..haar ke jeetne wale ko bazigar kehte hai..vagera vagera..haha..waise bhi asli maqsad toh woh plunge le pane ka hota hai..inn main se kai regimes ka(jiski/iss plunge ke bare main main pehle hi baat kar chuka hoon)..[..jab tak dhong bana rahe..varna sara khel barbad ho sakta hai..]

Bhai jab aap yeh walla kaam karte ho tab aap..democracy ko lagbhag jad se hi hack kar liye hote ho..socho ab agar koi apne employee ka performance appraisal hi nahi kar paye.. aur na sirf itna hi…balki promote karne par bhi majboor ho jaye..sochne wali baat ho jaati hai …phir toh ..hai na..haha

Conspiracy theorist(continuing):

Lekin aise system main ek glaring kamzori bhi hoti hai..ise aap ek vulnerability bhi keh sakte ho..

Log ab aise regime ki oppressive behaviour se ekdum tang aachuke hote hai..bas nikalna chahte hai..lekin maloom nahi ki yeh kaise hoga..(Iss recent Russian elections se pehle kaafi iss kisam ke news items dekhe the maine..jiss main kuch log keh rehe the ki pata nahi Putin ji ko kaise nikala jaye)…woh toh bas kab se opposition ko jeetane ke liye hi baithe hai.. lekin iss problem ki vajah se inke votes opposition ki victory main translate nahi ho pa rahe..aise main keval aap ko bas isi samasya ka samadhan karna hota hai..agar aisa hogaya/kar liya aapne toh samjho aisi regime toh gayi..toh yahan par aise model ki ek bohot badi vulnerability bhi hai..

Apex court n lower courts:

Kuch regimes ne toh country ke apex courts se lekar lower courts tak..inn sabhi ko compromise kar diya hota hai..(inn these above mentioned countries…aise shayad already dekhne ko milta hai..eg..Iran probably being a case in point)..

Yahan par bhi aap aksar dekhoge ki..inconcenquential chchote types wale cases ..opposition/citizens ke paksh main jaa rahe hote hai..lekin pivotal/crucial types wale cases ke faisle regime ke favour main hi hote hai..ise bhi ek trick hi samjho..yeh isiliye kiya jaata hai..jaise lage(citizenry..Aur international observers ki nazaron main)ki democracy still happens to b alive n kicking ..in dat unfortunate country..haha..(lekin plunge lene ke baad yeh bhi dhong khatam kar denge hum..inn main se kuch regimes aisa bhi sochti hai..haha)

Kai countries aise hai.. jahan yeh sab ho raha hai..sab internet pe hai..Iran/North Korea vegera main sunne main aaya hai..regimes faisle khud karvati hai apne hisab se..aisi courts main..hahaha..

Conspiracy theorist( continuing):Bhai iss sab ko bhi speculation hi samjho..as have nothing by way of proof to present to u rite now..regarding all dis..lekin kaafi material hai aise sab/iss kisam ke vishay ko lekar..internet main /social media main/inn learned LLM models main..one good thing bhai..internet doesn’t forget..also these trained LLM models ..they don’t unlearn..

*****

** Toh yah par ab ..iss particular ideology ko lekar ki gayi(uss din ki)baaton ko (ab)samapt kiya jaata hai(Jee haan..aage jaake..aap khud dekhoge ki kaise main iss particular ideology ke pluses ko ginaa raha hoon/ise defend kar raha hoon.Yeh sab aage ke parts ke liye maine chchod rakha hai)

**Age aane wale parts main..inn doosri political ideologies ko bhi explore kiya jayega..unke pluses minuses ginaye jayenge..sabr rakhiyeha..kulmilake poore 16 parts hote hai..iss piece ke..abhi toh adhe se bhi kam post kiye gaye hai..

******

***Baad main..chote mote corrections karte hue..(kyon ki yeh sab iss waqt scribbles form main hai)sahi order main bhi dalne walla hoon..(yeh sab ko/iss piece ke..inn sabhi parts ko..i mean..)

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

…”As an aside”…continues from previous..

[Section 4,part 5]

Titled…”D Adjunct of dis model”…[Adjunct?…jee haan…adjunct…]..

[**Bhailog..yeh joh kuch bhi main post kar raha hoon aajkal..yeh sab ka sab rough (work)kisam ka hai(“on d fly” likha gaya..rough kisam ka…”scribbles” types wala hai.]

[Gobindji keh rahe the ki ..mujhe iss sab ko..isi form main dump karna hoga(pata nahi aisa kyon chaha rahe hai)..toh main woh he kar raha hoon iss waqt..]

[Lekin maine phir bhi aisa kiya hai(below)..

kuch kuch jagah par maine kuch scribbles ko ek AI tool ke zariye parse karate hue uske output ko yahan par paste kiya hua hai.(kyon ki ve kuch zyada hi rough work type ke the)…

Tool ko keh deta tha..”writing style retain karna hai..bas grammar related changes karna hai(agar aisa kuch karne layak ka ho tabhi”)]

Kehne ka matlab yeh hai ki ..yeh sab ka sab rough kisam ka hai..rough work keh sakte ho ise ..joh main yahan par ab dump kar raha hoon..

Sirf aur sirf Gobind Ji ke liye kar raha hoon yeh sab..toh woh jaisa theek samjhe…

“Adjunct aspect of dis model”:

This model has an adjunct, an extension, so to speak, that goes beyond the national borders of the country—beyond the borders of the native country where this kind of model is mounted.

That’s where this model starts becoming more ambitious, from the point of view of the regime.

Ambitious? Yes, ambitious in terms of wanting to be an enabler, a stakeholder in trying to challenge, reshape, or disturb the existing global power equation.

This includes ambitions of directly challenging the now existing unipolar (dominated by Western democracies) global order.

**These ambitions roughly translate to wanting to carve out a counterbalancing global order, as a counter to the now existing West-dominated order, thereby introducing bipolarity or even multipolarity in the global order and the existing geopolitical equations of the world.

**Central Idea/Need/Single Most Reason Behind this Adjunct (ie..Utility of This Model's Adjunct):

The whole idea behind wanting to mount this adjunct part of the model across nations is to somehow be able to form or establish some kind of a "league" of like-minded nations, i.e., nations whose constituent members share similar political ideological orientations.

This mostly includes countries ruled by right-wing, far-right, or authoritarian regimes.

It doesn’t really matter which color of wing these regimes adopt in their respective domestic politics.

Remember, as far as they are concerned, ideology is secondary; it is all about power and money really.

When it comes to these regimes, that's the bottom line. They consider ideology merely a front that helps capture the hearts and minds of their domestic citizenry, allowing them to deceive their (respective)citizenry perpetually.

The sole purpose or aim behind wanting to establish this kind of a league is for these regimes to think this league will be able to effectively counter, act as a counterweight, or balance against the now existing West-dominated/Western democracies (and their allies) dominated global order.

****This adjunct of this model, this need for the formation of a counterbalancing league, can be thought of as a bailout plan.

Bailout plan? Yes, "a potential bailout plan" that these model-mounting regimes and their leaders may be secretly counting on or banking on.

************

About dis bail out plan:

Many of these/quite a few of such regimes (these regime leaders, I mean), have now managed to completely/totally mount this parasitic model in their respective countries. By degrees, they had been mounting this model, over time, (during their tenure, in their respective countries).

..(As a consequence of this)..Many among them have now managed to effectively transition their respective countries to an “authoritarian regime ruled” kind of countries (with not a trace of democracy left whatsoever, in such countries…having managed to successfully mount this model in its totality, in these countries).

Completely non-functioning democracies (perpetually in a state of undeclared emergency, these countries are)...such countries have now been turned into.

Take the case of Putin (also do not forget his current rogue actions in Ukraine),Netanyahu (Netanyahu has now started a massive ethnic cleansing exercise/genocide in the Gaza Strip.25,000 Palestinians have perished to date in this ongoing genocide (he’s presently heeding nobody, not the UN, not d US..essentially nobody)), Orbán of Hungary, the Belarus guy, Lukashenko, the Turkey guy, the Ayatollah of Iran (who is currently involved in crushing a massive citizens protest in his own country, using criminal/rogue methods), etc., etc.

[Bhai log.. yeh Netanyahu wali baat..yeh Putin wali baat.. inn bhai saheb ne uss dinko nahi ..balki kisi aur mulaquaat main ki thi..lekin main inn baaton ko..(context ke hisab se)yahan par mention kar raha hoon.

Kai jagah par maine aisa kiya hai..aur kai aur aisi/alag baaton ke liye bhi maine aise kiya hua hai(joh uss world engineering day wale din nahi kahi gayi thi..balki aage ki mulaquuaton main kahi gayi thi]

Think about such regimes (and their respective supreme leaders)they have all brought down their respective countries/citizenry to its knees (many of them were perfectly democratic countries to begin with..mind you.(well..at least on paper..this happens to b d case..even today..in many of these /such countries))…

Think of all those criminal unconstitutional methods they may have deployed over the years (to enable this model mounting onto their respective countries)…so could take (i.e., stuff that may have enabled them to take) their respective countries from (these) having been/being perfectly democratic kind of countries (at one point in time)..to their now present-day reality, of that of transitioning/ of having transitioned to non-functioning authoritarian kind of democracies.

Many regimes today..their supreme leaders, have now been branded genocidal/criminal maniacs by all those in the know, i.e., the international observers, et al.

This chief fear that haunts many, in each of these regimes (their supreme leaders included), day and night is this bit (below): what if one fine day they wake up and all of a sudden find/discover that they have now (suddenly) lost power (i.e., are no more in power in their native country, i.e., have been dislodged from power, by their political opponents[Eg other causes (wrt regime ouster):a citizens revolution(as has happened in d case of Sri Lanka)..cud even b coz of some kind of a coup being effected in dat country(Pakistan has seen many such coups..)..etc..]..in their own countries).

Not difficult to guess..wat shall happen /follow next..(ie..wid regards to a/dis now fallen regime…)..in dis kind of a changed scenario..

[Easy to see that they(d regime personnel..also d supreme leader)shall all be booked for treachery and crimes against humanity (in their own country)..

It's no secret that some of these regimes deserve to be brought to trial in their native country’s criminal courts, and some amongst them even deserve to be dragged straight to The Hague, so can be tried in these specially constituted prosecution tribunals.

So what is it, they think, can now save them( ie ..help them prevent dis kind of an eventuality)?..

[**This is where this adjunct related bail out plan comes in]

**Some amongst them probably actually thinking...”well ..now that we have managed to take the/our country to a far-right authoritarian kind of setup, we are now only one/just a step away from assuming total/complete dictatorship (to b even toying wid dis idea ..how dangerous dis kind of a thing cud prove..think about it)..”

They think..”…as and when this happens(ie ..us assuming total dictatorship/us taking dat final plunge)the next natural step of course then would be to completely abolish/banish elections from our land, thus stamping out democracy completely from our land.

All this shall of course be done quite blatantly (with no consideration whatsoever given to international opinion…no more shall we bother thereafter…to carry on with this pretence/this charade of “democracy being kicking and alive in our country” bit...(on the global stage/on global platforms..ie..as and when such questions may get raised..ie..questions with regard to the democracy credentials/status of the country)).

So dis is (roughly )how we shall /we propose to go about dis business of assuming total dictatorship ..(ie..as and when an opportunity arises/presents itself of being able to do so..(ie to b able to take dat blatant kind of a plunge.))

[***….thus/in d process eliminating/banishing/eradicating…all r domestic political opponents..d opposing citizenry...or some other such threat from our lives ..forever and ever...(and with that, eliminating all chances of us ever getting booked/being brought to justice by the citizenry of the country..as well as r political opponents)..]

So r agendas pretty clear..all we need to now do is .. wait for dis opportunity..dats all..ie an opportunity.. dat shall afford/allow us dis kind of a blatant plunge..”

[Pls bear in mind..all dis(ie stuff mentioned in d part)is just speculation..as have nothing by way of proof to present to u ..in dis regard]..

************

This below bit ..examines the hesitancy of authoritarian regimes to fully transition into dictatorships due to the potential for international retaliation, and proposes a strategic alliance of like-minded regimes as a countermeasure.

So, what stops such regimes from making the leap to full dictatorship and becoming all-powerful entities in their native lands(and thereby crushing their opponents (whether political or otherwise )forever):

The answer is simple. The probable retaliatory actions from the powerful, West-dominated unipolar world (i.e., from its constituent countries,/from all those powerful Western democracies and their allies) are significant deterrents.Such retaliatory actions could include United Nations interventions, NATO or allied forces actions, sanctions or embargoes (for example, related to trade, economic, defense, or technology transfer), international isolation, etc.

These are examples of measures that transitioning to a dictatorship could invite, potentially inflicted in a consolidated manner by the West-influenced international community on such countries, and by extension, on these regimes and their leaders.

This possibility obviously scares them a lot, discouraging them from taking that plunge.

[***These countries could face international isolation, sanctions (trade, defense, technology transfer, economic-related), embargoes, actions in the UN/international courts, and responses from allied forces/NATO, among other consequences.]

********

Have already mentioned earlier on..dis bit?(below)..Its explanation now..

“…this adjunct part of the model, which has a geopolitical angle and has been long waiting to be mounted globally, is viewed by these regimes as somewhat of a bailout plan…”

Here’s d explanation/here’s how..

In the event they start to sense a potential loss of power (to domestic political opponents)or face citizen uprisings that could culminate in their ousting (e.g., Sri Lanka being a case in point), they may then want to/decide to unhesitatingly take the leap to dictatorship ..“without worrying about the international community”.

“However, they all understand that forming a league of like-minded regimes globally, capable of acting as a counterbalance to the existing West-dominated global order, is a prerequisite before making such a leap domestically.”

They all (probably?..is only speculation..remember?)silently nurture an ambition, thinking, “If today we succeed in forging this counterbalancing league of right-wing, far-right, authoritarian regimes from across the globe, a league of like-minded regimes, we will then be able to effectively establish a bipolar or multipolar power equation in the world. This would counter the current West-dominated unipolar axis/global order on all fronts.”This league would be self-sufficient in every possible respect, with little or no dependence on Western democracies and their alliances in terms of defense economics/trade, etc. For example, it would eliminate dependence on the West for acquiring defense-related assets, ensure self-sufficiency in meeting energy/oil needs, counter threats from allied forces/NATO with a united front, support each other at the UN and other world bodies, and eliminate economic and trade dependence on Western countries and their allies.

So, they believe that the success of this league would bring certain opportunities that constituent countries could leverage in their domestic political scenarios.

One such opportunity would be the “ideal time” for some among them to transition their lands from being democratically inclined to dictatorial setups, with very little or no threat from the West and its allies upon making such transitions.

[The strategic calculations behind the reluctance of authoritarian regimes to fully embrace dictatorship and the perceived benefits of forming a geopolitical alliance of like-minded regimes…is wat dis whole text was all about]…

******

Adjunct related activities/ actions (ie.. all those activities/actions.. dat (such regimes think)may all culminate in finally being able to establish dat league (of like minded regimes))..witnessed in recent years(dat is .. if at all there’s really such a thing as an adjunct related geopolitical ambition in d first place.. have already told u.. is best only a speculation..as have nothing dat I can present by way of a proof to u)…performed by few of these rt wing /far right/authoritarian regime ruled countries in these recent years ( across d globe)..

[Think..these actions can b thought of as /construed as/come across as attempts at wanting to forge dis kind of a league…]..

1.Support at d UN to Putin ..by many such regimes(This kind of a thing has been witnessed many a times.. during dis ongoing Ukraine/ Russia conflict)..

2.Many such regimes..them trying to help Russia/Putin.. by bypassing/circumventing those international/imposed sanctions/ embargo on Russia..this too has been witnessed many a times..

Think Irans supplying Putin wid weapons too.

3.These regimes can often b witnessed openly supporting/endorsing their ideological (political)counterparts..(be they from any country)..during their election times ..

4.The often seems to b a common pattern in their actions leading up to d national elections..

Many a times/often also seems to b a pattern in their actions..post these national elections(ie in d event they happen to loose these elections)..

This kind of a thing one often gets to witness/spot/see in many such regime ruled countries..

5.There possibly seems to b some kind of a knowledge transfer(either actively or passively)happening amongst many of these rt wing /far rt/authoritarian regimes .. all across d globe..

[Methods n tactics..dat seem to b succeeding in one regime ruled country.. ie methods n tactics..deployed by a regime in its native country..(and dat seem to b succeeding too ..ie..succeeding from the point of view of dis regime being able to further its domestic political ends in dat country )..seem to b finding ready acceptance..by way of these/these very same tactics n tricks being adopted..by an /some other such regime.. in an other country.. (ie..to enable d tricks adopting regime..to gain in its own domestic politics)( so .. in effect ..can say..d result of some kind of a litmus test.. being performed by a regime in one country..kinda becomes a pointer for it to b replicated/adopted(or not/and sometimes not.. when these tricks/tactics seem to have failed in one country)by another regime in an other country(pointer/litmus test?..as in?.. ie..wid regards to d suitability of these very same tricks/tactics being adopted by an other /similar regime ..in an other country).

In dis ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine..quite a few of these regime’s ..their entire propaganda machinery..is openly seen to b coming out in support of Russia (during dis entire/ongoing conflict).. it is almost as if d propaganda machinery of these like minded regimes..was/is doubling up as/for Putins/Russian states propaganda machinery..ie..have all become extensions of d Russia prop mach…(all d time taking/doling out exactly d same lines of propaganda/propaganda material ..d putins propaganda machinery has been taking/doling out.. all d time..on dis on going conflict).

One has to ask dis question.. has Putin out sourced his propaganda related tasks to these other prop machs..in a underhanded kinda manner..during these times..

Do not forget.. d same is being witnessed now..here in d case of dis ongoing conflict between Israel n Palestine..

These very same prop.machs ..now seems to b doling out/taking exactly d same lines .. (day in day out ) ..(ie exactly d same propaganda lines/propaganda material..these prop machs seems to b doling out..as d ones dat generally get doled out by Netanyahus Israeli state sponsored propaganda machinery..night n day..on dis issue..)..

Easy to see.. this very same prop.machs..belonging to these regimes..now seem to b doubling up for Netanyahus prop mach too…

****

**[Seem to b having ambitions of going international/ie..wanting to take d Mnc route..(Wat wid international collaborations…n all)..these prop.machs ..

(belonging to these similar minded regimes..ie..be they from any country)

Not content wid d domestic.. they all now seem to b having/nursing ambitions/designs of going international ..haha..

In d business of hot air/selling hot air..these prop machs (seem to me)..to b in..

Acha hai bhailog..achcha hai.. haha..

Bhailog ..think of all dat useful tech…dats being leveraged /deployed/engaged today..in dis sort of a thing..

**Obviously am only speculating out here..since have nothing by way of proof..to present to u all.]

*****

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

….continues from previous…

[Section no 4,Part 4.5]

Aspect no 16 of dis model:

Ie..Dat aspect of dis model..dat aims to /(potentially)enables a model mounting (mildly right wing kind of a )regime (once in power..in a perfectly democratic country)to take dis country/its own politics to a far right/extreme right /authoritarian/totalitarian/dictatorship kind of a set up/country..ie..dis aspect..am about to discuss now(below)..

---

This is true for many of these right-wing, far-right, dictatorial, authoritarian, and totalitarian regimes (ruling)today..

[In many countries today..where such regimes have managed to come to power [if it’s was a perfectly democratic kind of country ,then naturally the route they may have most likely taken to come to power would have to be that election route]..one comes across /witnesses dis kind of a thing…(below)…]

Such regimes first came to power/first tasted power, by virtue of winning elections (I am talking of perfectly democratic countries here, where such regimes taste power for the first time by virtue of winning elections).

What’s true?

This: it’s generally been observed that once such regimes taste power, i.e., come to power in their own native country, thereafter, they then very systematically go about compromising, demolishing the pivotal pillars of democracy in that country (pillars? Ie..d country’s free press, its judiciary, etc.).

Ie..one can say, they go about this business of undermining the constitution of that country (and by extension its democracy) ..in a systematic/underhanded/clandestine kinda manner.

Day in day out/ever so slowly/by degrees(lest the citizenry of the country start to suspect all that hanky-panky)..dis regime…it indulges in this underhanded/shady/clandestine kind of an thing/affair.

Like termites, they nibble away day and night at those pivotal pillars of democracy, of that unfortunate country.

There then finally comes a day, in this regime's tenure, when citizens one fine day wake up to this country’s new reality. Reality? Yes..dis new reality that this country’s no longer a functioning democracy anymore, and the country’s sort of in an undeclared emergency kind of situation now (…coz has now transitioned to an authoritarian kind of country that now revolves around an authoritarian figure)

So… how is this kind of a thing achieved by this regime in that particular country?

Answer's simple: “By beginning to incrementally mount this parasitic/paralytic model onto this unfortunate country (read: onto the “poor unsuspecting” citizenry/onto the democratic pillars/institutions/safeguards of democracy, of that country) ..(as soon as the regimes are in power/once this regime acquires power in that unfortunate country)..is how dis kind of an shady agenda gets achieved (..over time/ie..in time..during dis regimes ongoing tenure)..

The degree to which this model gets mounted is the/equals to d extent to which the democracy of that country has been compromised (or the extent to which the constitution of that country has been undermined… is directly proportional/relates to the degree to which this parasitic model has been mounted on that particular country..

Complete mounting of this model, i.e., mounting of this model in its totality, would probably imply this country may have now transitioned to a totalitarian/authoritarian kind of status/setup (that may now be completely revolving around a dictatorial figure)

Elements/aspects of the model are all mounted bit by bit onto this unfortunate country, over time, during this regime's tenure, lest the people/citizenry start to suspect. [“After all, Rome wasn’t built in a day, was it?…so times not a constraint here wid us..”..these/such regimes think.

It is a hidden agenda of the regime to mount this model, i.e., from day one, when they had first come to power, and ever since, they have been going about this business of mounting this model in an underhanded/shady kind of manner..on to their respective countries].

**Remember, the degree to which this model has been mounted on a country equates to/is equivalent to the degree to which the country (and the regime's right-wing politics) has been/has gotten shifted from mildly/moderately right towards the far right.

Total/complete mounting of the model (i.e., mounting of the model in its entirety/totality by the regime) would/may result in this country (and this regime's politics) having transitioned to an entirely (now) new/unrecognizable kind of entity, i.e., this country may now be looked upon as having turned into a rogue nation (i.e., could now be counted among rogue nations) by international observers. Meaning, this country may now have ended up completely traversing that cursed path, i.e., that of…from being mildly on the right to now having completely swung over to that cursed extremity of having transitioned to a far right/extreme right/authoritarian/totalitarian /dictatorship kind of country, with all its pivotal democratic institutions now having become completely subverted/non-functional (and everything in that country now revolving around a supreme leader). [How did this country traverse this path? i.e., from being mildly right to now being recognized as being on the extreme right.

Answer's simple: it's gotten here…by virtue of this parasitic model being mounted on it (by this rogue regime)…ever so slowly (i.e., mounting the model, by degrees, every time, lest the citizenry of the country starts to suspect something fishy) [/By mounting this model,onto the country, i.e., on the poor unsuspecting citizenry of the country, bit by bit/by degrees, day in day out…is how dis kind of a thing gets achieved]

******

The actions of the model-mounting regime, in trying to implement its hidden agenda once in power (mostly by/via the elections route, in a perfectly democratic country), [i.e/read ..actions in trying to take the country (d regimes politics) ..from mildly right to extreme/far right/authoritarian, by degrees/ever so slowly..by mounting this model by degrees] ..count them all..as being d enablers of dis particular aspect of this model.

Example/candidate regimes/countries, where this shifting from being (mildly?)right-wing (the nature of the politics practiced by a regime, to begin with, I mean, when it had managed to acquire national prominence for the very first time in the political landscape of a (now)model-mounted country) ..to (these regimes/countries) now being (openly) recognized (all over/internationally) as having transitioned to far right/authoritarian/(to outright roguishness even) ..may have occurred:

1.Hungary under Orbán

### A. Classification of Hungary as a Democracy

Hungary is classified as a democracy, particularly a parliamentary representative democratic republic. This means the country's political system is designed to elect officials representing the people's will, including a Prime Minister as the head of government within a multi-party system. However, the democracy in Hungary, especially under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's tenure, has been a subject of intense scrutiny and criticism. Various international observers and political analysts have pointed out Hungary's democratic backsliding, with concerns over judicial independence, media freedom, civil liberties, and the centralization of power in the executive branch. Despite these issues, Hungary officially remains a democracy, albeit with noted challenges and criticisms regarding its democratic processes and institutions.

### B. Nature of Orbán's Politics

1. **Early Years of Orbán's Politics**: When Viktor Orbán first came to power in 1998, he was considered a center-right politician. His political stance was pro-market, pro-Western integration, including Hungary's membership in the European Union and NATO, and he emphasized conservative and national values. However, even in these early years, he showed a penchant for strong leadership and centralized control.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Orbán's politics have shifted further to the right, with many now classifying his current political stance as far-right or at least right-wing populist. His tenure has been marked by an emphasis on nationalism, skepticism towards the EU (especially on issues like immigration), efforts to consolidate power within the executive branch, and policies viewed as eroding democratic norms and institutions. His government has also been criticized for its approach to the media, judiciary, and civil society, often accused of undermining their independence or co-opting them for the state's and ruling party's benefit.

### C. Orbán's Rise to Power

Viktor Orbán first came to power at a national level through the parliamentary elections in Hungary. His party, Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance (initially founded as a youth liberal party before shifting to the right), won the national elections in 1998, enabling Orbán to become Prime Minister for the first time. His initial term was from 1998 to 2002. After losing power in the 2002 and 2006 elections, Orbán and Fidesz won a landslide victory in the 2010 parliamentary elections, returning him to the Prime Minister's office. The 2010 victory was particularly significant because it allowed Fidesz to enact substantial constitutional and legislative changes, marking the beginning of Hungary's noted shift towards authoritarianism under Orbán's leadership. Since then, Orbán has remained in power, with Fidesz maintaining a dominant position in Hungarian politics through successive elections.

2.Belarus under Lukashenko

### A. Classification of Belarus as a Democracy

Belarus, under Alexander Lukashenko's leadership, is not classified as a democracy in the conventional sense. Since Lukashenko came to power in 1994, Belarus has been described as an authoritarian state by numerous international observers and political analysts. The country's political system is characterized by a lack of free and fair elections, suppression of political opposition, limited freedom of the press, and the centralization of power in the hands of the president. Lukashenko has maintained control over all key aspects of the government and society, effectively limiting political freedoms and democratic institutions. Although Belarus has the formal structure of a presidential republic with an elected parliament, the elections have been widely criticized for not meeting international standards of fairness and transparency, leading to the conclusion that Belarus operates as an authoritarian regime rather than a functioning democracy.

### B. Nature of Lukashenko's Politics

1. **Early Years of Lukashenko's Politics**: Alexander Lukashenko assumed the presidency of Belarus in 1994, presenting himself as an anti-corruption figure and a populist with the promise to restore order and economic stability from the post-Soviet chaos. His early policies were marked by a strong emphasis on state control of the economy and a nostalgic appeal to Soviet-era stability and social security systems.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Lukashenko's politics have increasingly become authoritarian. He has consolidated power through constitutional changes (notably, removing presidential term limits), suppressed political dissent, controlled media outlets, and used the security apparatus to maintain his rule. Lukashenko's regime is known for its harsh treatment of opposition figures, including arrests, suppression of protests, and media censorship. Economically, his government has maintained significant state control over key industries, while also seeking closer ties with Russia and other authoritarian states. His political stance can be classified as authoritarian, with a focus on maintaining power through any means necessary, including the suppression of democratic institutions and civil liberties.

### C. Lukashenko's Rise to Power

Alexander Lukashenko first came to power in Belarus through the presidential elections in 1994. This election was the first—and to date, arguably the only—free presidential election in the country since it gained independence following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Lukashenko, then a relatively unknown figure outside of his role as a director of a state farm (sovkhoz) and a deputy in the Belarusian parliament, campaigned as an anti-corruption, populist candidate. He won the election with a substantial margin, appealing to voters with promises of stability, anti-corruption measures, and a return to the economic security reminiscent of the Soviet era.

Since his initial election, Lukashenko has remained in power through successive presidential elections. These elections have been marred by widespread allegations of fraud and manipulation, as well as suppression of opposition candidates and activists. The constitutional amendments, particularly those removing presidential term limits and expanding presidential powers, have allowed Lukashenko to extend his rule indefinitely, solidifying his control over Belarusian politics and society.

[*** Bhailog ..elections toh suna hai North Korea /Iran /Russia main bhi hote hai..lekin kya yeh..khair…

Pakistan main joh recent elections hue the..woh bhi kuch alag hi kisam ke rahe the..lekin aisi cheez se duniya ko koi farak nahi ..aise lag raha hai…]

Yeh sab toh isiliye kara jaata hai..(yeh elections wale dhong ki main baat kar raha hoon yahan par)..taaki duniya ko lage ki democracy jeevit uss desh main(Domestic /civil unrest ko prevent karpane ke hisab se bhi yeh sab kiya jaata hai shayad)]

3.Turkey under the current regime

### A. Classification of Turkey as a Democracy

Turkey, under the leadership of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, remains officially classified as a democracy, specifically a parliamentary representative democratic republic transitioning to a presidential system in 2018. The country has a long history of democratic governance interspersed with military coups. Erdoğan's tenure, first as Prime Minister (2003-2014) and then as President (2014-present), has seen significant political, economic, and social changes. While Turkey maintains electoral processes for choosing leaders and representatives, the quality of its democracy has been a subject of intense debate and concern. Critics argue that under Erdoğan, Turkey has experienced democratic backsliding, with increasing control over the judiciary, media, and civil society, along with the curtailment of freedoms and rights, pushing it toward authoritarianism. Despite these issues, Turkey continues to function with democratic institutions and practices, albeit with significant challenges to their integrity and independence.

### B. Nature of Erdoğan's Politics

1. **Early Years of Erdoğan's Politics**: When Recep Tayyip Erdoğan co-founded the Justice and Development Party (AKP) and came to power in 2003, his politics were rooted in moderate Islamist and conservative democratic principles, aiming to balance Turkey's secular traditions with its majority Muslim identity. He was initially praised for his reforms that strengthened democracy, improved the economy, and aimed for European Union accession, alongside efforts to address long-standing Kurdish issues.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over time, Erdoğan's governance has shifted towards increasingly authoritarian practices. His administration has been marked by a significant consolidation of power, particularly after the 2016 failed coup attempt, which led to massive purges across the government, military, and civil society. The transition from a parliamentary to a presidential system in 2018 further centralized power in the presidency. Erdoğan's current politics are characterized by nationalism, a clampdown on dissent and freedom of expression, and a foreign policy that oscillates between assertiveness in regional conflicts and strategic alliances. His stance can be classified as right-wing with increasingly authoritarian tendencies, leveraging populism and control over media and judiciary to maintain power.

### C. Erdoğan's Rise to Power

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan first rose to national prominence in Turkey through electoral politics. Before becoming Prime Minister, he served as the Mayor of Istanbul from 1994 to 1998. His tenure as mayor was marked by effective governance that significantly improved the city's infrastructure and services, which helped build his popularity.

Erdoğan's national rise to power began when the Justice and Development Party (AKP), a party he helped found, won a landslide victory in the 2002 parliamentary elections. This victory came amid economic turmoil and dissatisfaction with the existing political establishment. Erdoğan himself was banned from running due to a prior conviction, but this ban was later lifted, allowing him to run for a seat in a by-election in 2003. Upon winning, he assumed the role of Prime Minister.

His initial years in office were focused on democratic reforms, economic stabilization, and efforts to begin EU accession talks. The AKP's electoral success continued in subsequent elections, reinforcing Erdoğan's position. In 2014, he was elected President of Turkey in the country's first direct presidential election, and he was re-elected in 2018 following the introduction of a new presidential system that significantly expanded the powers of the position. This system of governance came into effect after a 2017 referendum, which narrowly approved the constitutional changes. Since then, Erdoğan has remained a central figure in Turkish politics, navigating both domestic and international challenges to maintain his and his party's grip on power.

4.. Putin and Russia..

### A. Classification of Russia as a Democracy

Russia, under Vladimir Putin's leadership, is officially classified as a federal semi-presidential republic, implying a mix of presidential and parliamentary systems with democratic elements such as elections. However, the nature of its democracy has been widely criticized and questioned. Since Putin first became President in 2000, the country has seen significant democratic backsliding, with increasing control over political life, media, civil liberties, and the suppression of political opposition. These actions have led many international observers and political analysts to describe Russia as having moved towards authoritarianism under Putin. The government maintains the formality of democratic processes, such as elections, but these are often criticized for lack of fairness and transparency, suppression of opposition, and media control, raising serious doubts about the democratic nature of Putin's Russia.

### B. Nature of Putin's Politics

1. **Early Years of Putin's Politics**: When Vladimir Putin first ascended to the presidency in 2000, his political stance was primarily focused on stabilizing the Russian state after the tumultuous post-Soviet 1990s, strengthening the economy, and restoring Russia's position on the global stage. Initially, there was a mix of economic liberalism in terms of market reforms and a strong hand in centralizing power to the presidency, aimed at combating oligarchical influence and separatist movements.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Putin's governance has increasingly displayed authoritarian characteristics. The centralization of power in the Kremlin, control over major media outlets, suppression of political opposition, and manipulation of electoral processes to maintain power have been prominent features of his rule. Putin's politics now heavily emphasize nationalism, state control over the economy, and a foreign policy marked by assertiveness and sometimes confrontation with the West. Internally, his regime is characterized by a lack of political pluralism, with significant constraints on civil liberties and political freedoms. This shift has led to Russia being classified by many as an authoritarian regime rather than a functioning democracy.

### C. Putin's Rise to Power

Vladimir Putin's rise to power in Russia was marked by rapid ascension through the political ranks, culminating in his presidency. Before becoming President, Putin served in various significant positions, including as Director of the Federal Security Service (FSB) and Secretary of the Security Council.

His direct pathway to the presidency began when President Boris Yeltsin appointed him as Prime Minister in August 1999. Just a few months later, on December 31, 1999, Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned, appointing Putin as Acting President. Putin then won the presidential election in March 2000, officially beginning his term as President of Russia.

Since then, Putin has maintained a stronghold on Russian politics through successive terms as President and Prime Minister. Between 2008 and 2012, he served as Prime Minister under President Dmitry Medvedev, due to constitutional term limits, before returning to the presidency in 2012 after constitutional amendments allowed him to serve additional terms. These maneuvers, along with the manipulation of the political system and suppression of opposition, have enabled Putin to remain the dominant figure in Russian politics for over two decades.

Israel under Netanyahu.

### A. Classification of Israel as a Democracy

Israel, under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, remains classified as a parliamentary democracy. The country has a multiparty system with legislative elections held regularly, where the Knesset (parliament) is elected directly by the people. Israel's judiciary is independent, and its legal system combines English common law, civil law, and Jewish law. Despite these democratic frameworks, Netanyahu's tenure has seen significant controversy, particularly related to his alliances with far-right parties and proposed judicial reforms that critics argue could undermine the balance of powers and the independence of the judiciary. Such moves have sparked massive protests and debates within Israeli society about the future direction of its democracy. Nonetheless, Israel continues to hold regular elections and maintains a vibrant public sphere where diverse political views are expressed, albeit within a context of heightened tensions and divisions, especially concerning its Palestinian population and territories under occupation.

### B. Nature of Netanyahu's Politics

1. **Early Years of Netanyahu's Politics**: Benjamin Netanyahu's political stance has been consistently right-wing, focusing on security concerns, the economy, and a hardline approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His early tenure was marked by liberal economic reforms and a tough stance on negotiations with the Palestinians, maintaining a skepticism toward the peace process that characterized his later years in power.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Netanyahu's governance has become increasingly associated with nationalist and right-wing policies, significantly influenced by his alliances with far-right parties in Israel. These alliances have been crucial for forming governing coalitions, especially given the fragmented nature of Israeli politics. His current tenure has seen proposals for significant judicial reforms that have been perceived by many as an attempt to consolidate power and weaken checks and balances, leading to widespread protests. Furthermore, Netanyahu's administration has pursued policies that are seen as entrenching Israeli control over occupied territories, which has intensified domestic and international debate about Israel's future as a Jewish and democratic state.

### C. Netanyahu's Rise to Power

Benjamin Netanyahu's rise to power in Israel began in the political arena of the Likud party, a major right-wing political party in Israel. He first became the party leader in 1993 and then served as Israel's Prime Minister from 1996 to 1999, marking his first term in office. During this period, he became known for his hardline stance on security issues and the peace process with the Palestinians.

After a period out of office, during which he held several significant positions, including Minister of Finance, Netanyahu returned as Prime Minister in 2009. Since then, he has been a central figure in Israeli politics, serving multiple consecutive terms. His ability to remain in power has been significantly aided by his skill in forming coalitions, often requiring alliances with far-right and religious parties to secure a governing majority in the Knesset. These coalitions have pushed Netanyahu to adopt more right-wing positions, particularly regarding security, settlement policies in the West Bank, and the proposed judicial reforms.

Netanyahu's political longevity and influence are also attributed to his focus on Israel's economy and security, areas where he has claimed significant achievements. However, his tenure has been marked by controversy, including charges of corruption that led to a trial, and significant public protests both against and in support of his policies and leadership.

Netanyahu, in his desperation to form a government in Israel (so he can escape all those charges(impending imprisonment)that he’s been facing for quite sometime now ..in this country), has joined hands with the far right/extreme right parties (this time around).

And in his desperation to be able to keep/retain this kind of an alliance (as his recent actions indicate/as is borne out by his recent actions), he’s now found to be implementing far-right policies in this country (action by Israeli forces in Gaza/West Bank, this ongoing conflict, a case in point, I mean).

Seems to have effectively transitioned Israel to a far-right authoritarian kind of a setup, it seems. [Think about it. All this probably (his recent actions ..I mean..)stems from the fact of desperately wanting to escape imprisonment].

Iran under khamenei:

### A. Classification of Iran as a Democracy

Iran, under the leadership of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is officially described as an Islamic Republic, combining elements of a theocracy and a democracy. The political system includes elected bodies, such as the presidency and the parliament (Majles), which operate under the overarching authority of the Supreme Leader, a position held by Khamenei since 1989. This structure allows for electoral politics within a framework heavily influenced by religious authority and principles. The Supreme Leader has significant control over key institutions, including the military and judiciary, and a council of clerics (the Guardian Council) has the power to vet candidates for public office, ensuring they adhere to Islamic principles.

While there are aspects of democracy in Iran's political system, such as regular elections, the authority vested in the Supreme Leader and the religious establishment significantly limits the democratic nature of governance. Critics argue that this structure restricts political pluralism, freedom of expression, and the rights of minorities and women, classifying Iran more as a theocratic republic with democratic elements rather than a full democracy.

### B. Nature of Khamenei's Politics

1. **Early Years of Khamenei's Leadership**: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei succeeded Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founding Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic, in 1989. Initially, Khamenei was seen as a figure who would continue Khomeini's legacy, focusing on consolidating the Islamic Republic's theocratic governance, maintaining a stance against Western influence, and promoting Islamic values within Iran and in its foreign policy.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Khamenei's leadership has seen a tightening of control over Iran's political landscape, emphasizing the preservation of the Islamic Republic's principles against internal and external challenges. His tenure has been marked by a cautious approach to reform, prioritizing the regime's stability and the principles of the Islamic Revolution. Khamenei has wielded significant influence over Iran's domestic and foreign policies, including its nuclear program and regional interventions, which have often put Iran at odds with Western countries. His politics can be characterized by a strong adherence to Shiite Islamic governance, conservatism, and a suspicion of Western intentions, alongside a focus on maintaining the regime's authority and Iran's regional influence.

### C. Khamenei's Rise to Power

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's rise to the position of Supreme Leader of Iran in 1989 was a result of both his close association with the Islamic Revolution and the support of the Assembly of Experts, a deliberative body of Mujtahids (Islamic scholars) responsible for electing the Supreme Leader. Khamenei was a key figure in the 1979 Islamic Revolution and held several important positions in the new government, including President of Iran from 1981 to 1989.

Following the death of Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran's first Supreme Leader, Khamenei was selected by the Assembly of Experts to succeed him. His selection was somewhat surprising to observers, as Khamenei was not originally considered among the highest-ranking Shiite clerics (he was a Hojatoleslam at the time, a rank below Ayatollah). However, his commitment to the Revolution's ideals, his political acumen, and his close relationships within the revolutionary leadership, including with Khomeini, helped secure his position.

Since becoming Supreme Leader, Khamenei has significantly expanded the powers and authority of the office, becoming a pivotal figure in Iran's political and religious life. His leadership has emphasized the continuation of the Islamic Revolution's principles, the defense of Iran's sovereignty, and resistance against Western influence, particularly from the United States and its allies.

Srilanka under Gotabaya Rajapaksa:

### A. Classification of Sri Lanka as a Democracy

Sri Lanka is classified as a democratic republic, where the President serves as both the head of state and government within a multi-party system. The country has a long-standing tradition of holding regular elections for its parliamentary representatives and the presidency. However, during Gotabaya Rajapaksa's presidency, which began in November 2019, Sri Lanka faced significant challenges that stirred debates about the state of its democracy. Critics pointed to tendencies toward authoritarianism, citing concerns over governance, such as the centralization of power, allegations of human rights abuses, and measures that were seen as undermining judicial independence and media freedom. Despite these concerns, Sri Lanka retained its democratic framework, with active political opposition, civil society engagement, and a functioning, albeit contentious, electoral process.

### B. Nature of Gotabaya Rajapaksa's Politics

1. **Early Politics and Background**: Gotabaya Rajapaksa, before his presidency, was best known for his role as the Defence Secretary of Sri Lanka, where he played a crucial part in ending the long-standing civil war against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in 2009. His tenure in this role was marked by a decisive, militaristic approach to conflict resolution and governance, leading to both acclaim for ending the civil war and criticism for alleged human rights abuses.

2. **Evolution to the Presidency**: Gotabaya Rajapaksa's presidency began with a focus on national security, economic development, and a strong centralized government. His political stance has been described as nationalist, with a significant emphasis on the Sinhala Buddhist majority's interests. The Rajapaksa administration faced considerable criticism for its handling of the economy, alleged authoritarian governance practices, and handling of ethnic and religious minority rights. The economic crisis that unfolded during his presidency, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and decisions like banning chemical fertilizers without a phased approach, led to widespread protests demanding his resignation.

### C. Gotabaya Rajapaksa's Rise to Power

Gotabaya Rajapaksa's rise to power culminated with his election as the President of Sri Lanka in November 2019. Before his presidency, he was a prominent figure in Sri Lankan politics and governance, mainly due to his role in the defence sector and his association with the Rajapaksa political dynasty. His brother, Mahinda Rajapaksa, served as President of Sri Lanka from 2005 to 2015, during which Gotabaya was Defence Secretary.

Gotabaya's presidential campaign capitalized on his reputation as a decisive leader who could ensure the country's security and unity, especially in the wake of the Easter Sunday bombings in April 2019. These attacks heightened national security concerns, playing to Gotabaya's strengths and campaign focus. His election reflected a significant part of the electorate's desire for strong, effective leadership in matters of national security and development. However, his presidency quickly faced significant challenges, including economic instability and social unrest, leading to a decline in his popularity and massive protests that eventually pressured him to flee the country and resign in July 2022, marking a dramatic and tumultuous end to his term in office.

Syria under Assad:

### A. Classification of Syria as a Democracy

Syria, under the leadership of Bashar al-Assad, is not classified as a democracy. Since inheriting power from his father, Hafez al-Assad, in 2000, Bashar al-Assad's rule has been characterized by authoritarian governance. The political system is highly centralized around the presidency, with Assad and the Ba'ath Party holding dominant control over state institutions, including the military, judiciary, and media. Political opposition is severely restricted, and elections in Syria have been widely criticized by international observers for lacking transparency and fairness. The Assad regime has been accused of widespread human rights abuses, especially during the Syrian Civil War, which began in 2011. The war itself has been marked by severe repression of dissent, including the use of force against civilians, making Syria's classification far from a democratic state.

### B. Nature of Bashar al-Assad's Politics

1. **Early Years of Assad's Leadership**: Initially, there were hopes that Bashar al-Assad, a British-educated ophthalmologist, might introduce reforms and lead Syria towards a more open and progressive governance model. Early in his rule, there was a brief period known as the "Damascus Spring" where some political and social liberalization seemed possible. However, this period quickly ended with a crackdown on dissent and a reversion to authoritarian practices.

2. **Evolution to the Present**: Over the years, Assad's governance has hardened, particularly in response to the Syrian Civil War. His regime has been marked by its survival strategy, relying heavily on military force, alliances with Russia and Iran, and a brutal suppression of opposition. Assad's political stance is characterized by a focus on maintaining power, national sovereignty, and a secular state in the face of various internal and external threats, including opposition groups and extremist militants. The Assad regime has been accused of numerous human rights violations, including the use of chemical weapons against civilians.

### C. Bashar al-Assad's Rise to Power

Bashar al-Assad's rise to power was not initially expected, as he was the second son of Hafez al-Assad, Syria's long-time ruler. His older brother, Basil, who was being groomed for leadership, died in a car accident in 1994. Following this, Bashar was recalled from London, where he was studying ophthalmology, to be prepared for leadership. He entered the military academy and quickly rose through the ranks within the military and the Ba'ath Party.

After the death of Hafez al-Assad in 2000, Bashar was positioned to succeed him. He was rapidly promoted through the ranks of the party and military, and his succession was confirmed by a referendum in which he was the only candidate, receiving an overwhelming majority of the vote. This transition marked the continuation of the Assad family's rule over Syria, which began when Hafez al-Assad took power in 1970. Bashar's presidency started with some promises of reform but soon reverted to the authoritarian rule characteristic of his father's tenure, especially as the country plunged into civil war in 2011.

[ Bhailog ..inn conspiracy theorist bhaisahab ne yahan par example ke diye jaane ke hisab se.. inn sab leaders ka naam liya tha(above).

Inki iss rt to far rt/authoritarian wali theory ko verify karpane ke hisab se..maine ek AI took ka istamal kiya tha..(recently kiya tha).

Usi tool ke output ko maine yaha par paste kiya hai(ie dat (above)material dats been laid out..out here..with respect to these leaders..is wat am talking about here)..]

******

On a different note:

Look at Trump’s all those actions..leading up to d elections (i.e., the ones he’d lost)…also his other actions after losing these elections(what with dat “storming of the Capitol Hill”incident..also his supporters calling those election results rigged..etc etc..)..most certainly has managed to raise a lot of questions..all dis..in his critics/political opponents minds..(..as to d truth of these allegations..am quite frankly not in d know)

Bolsonaro of Brazil ..his actions too..pre n post those elections (ie d one’s he had lost)..these too have managed to raise a lot of question marks in ppls eyes..

If I remember it right..Trump was openly endorsing Bolsonaro..during his/Brazils election times..

*** Pls note..am by no means equating these two leaders wid d ones I had mentioned earlier on..

Bhai..waise inn do leaders ke bare main ..main zyada/khaas nahi jaanta(main yeh baat clear kardena chahata hoon yahan par)

**********

So, you can see from these examples, most of these guys may have come to power via the elections route(to begin wid) ..in a perfectly democratic setup ..

[ie..By starting a vicious campaign of misinformation/disinformation against their ruling political opponents/against the enemy countries/against d minorities/by polarizing the country..by playing up/stoking hyper-nationalistic/religious sentiments/xenophobia..etc..(ie..can say ..fear/hate/ignorance weapons r all being deployed here..(albeit in a limited manner)..)

All dis gets done..via/using a vicious propaganda setup ..comprising of the sold-out media/d social media (n all other types of media)..[A prerequisite dis really..setting up of a vicious prop mach ..I mean..(ie..if dis kind of a regime hopes to make forays into big time/national level politics..ie if it wants to come to power at a national level..in dat country)]..

[**Tall fantastic sounding/kinda promises too get publicly announced ..ie..use of greed weapon..albeit in a limited manner..is wat am talking about here]]

Here I am talking about these regimes, and the tactics/stuff such regimes have been known to deploy when trying to taste power/come to power..for the very first time ..

For example, like how they try to deploy fear and greed weapons (albeit/only in a limited manner…since are not in power presently, hence have only limited access to resources and govt apparatus…both being absolutely crucial/mandatory..if these two weapons r to b deployed to d fullest extent..on d citizenry in a country.

Don’t forget though dat hate n ignorance weapons can still be deployed to d maximum extent(their vicious prop mach. set up being a big enabler of/can help ensure dis))..on the innocent/unsuspecting citizenry of the country, so can win elections for the very first time in that country.

Once in power, they then go about mounting this model (by degrees), onto their native country, for example, by now brandishing these four weapons, to the fullest extent possible, onto the citizenry of the country (they now happen to be in power and hence now have access to unlimited manpower/resources, and control of state machinery too..i.e., all that crucial stuff that enables a regime, to leverage/train/deploy, these weapons on the citizenry to the fullest/maximum extent), in trying to slowly take the country, from being mildly right to the far/extreme right/authoritarian kind of a setup .

[Sometimes some of these regimes get ousted/dislodged from power, while still in the midst of trying to transition their/the country to the far right authoritarian kinda setup. This too has been witnessed in d past..in some countries.

This kind of a thing may happen, only and only because, they/such regimes were not able to mount this model, to its/d fullest extent, onto this country (we’re only in the process of doing so), as a consequence/result of this/and because of which ..democratic institutions in such countries were still alive and kicking/had managed to survive ..ie..judiciary as well as press had not fully fallen, and elections too had been fair (and couldn’t be compromised), so naturally, they fell/got ousted from power(kinda abruptly too..sometimes)..these regimes..haha..

---

[Bhailog..woh har ek leader ke bare main joh likha gaya hai..woh tool output hai]

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

…continues from previous…

[Section 4,Part 4.4]

Aspect no 15 of dis model:

Relationships between different stakeholders in dis kind of an ecosystem:

This bit explores the complex relationships among various stakeholders in a country where a right-wing, far-right, authoritarian regime has gained power, detailing how these relationships impact the governance and social fabric of the nation.

---

Relationships between different players/stakeholders in such a kind of model-mounted country (i.e., in a democratic country where a right-wing/far-right/authoritarian kind of regime is presently in power, and once in power, this regime, during its current tenure, has managed to mount this model bit by bit, by degrees, on that unfortunate country):

The right-winged pigs,the bag of tricks department personnel, the wing, the dogs,the morphing pigs(remember..am not in d least bit trying to b disrespectful..out here..i only am borrowing analogy from those previously mentioned works..dats all)..they all share a symbiotic kind of relationship amongst themselves; i.e., they all have a stake in this acquired power, sharing in the spoils of power (some quite directly and others indirectly).

***All these above-mentioned players share a parasitic kind of relationship with the majority population..ie d “sheep”…ironically the ones who happen to be in the majority in this country/in most countries.

Bear in mind, these above-mentioned stake holders/players (i.e., the ones sharing a symbiotic kind of relationship amongst themselves) may at best constitute no more than 10/15 percent of the population in that country, but they give the perception of being in the majority, all courtesy of their vicious propaganda setup, i.e., the one that is in the business of opinion shaping in that country.

It is this propaganda machinery that paints this picture/perception (night and day, in that unfortunate country) of these symbiotic stakeholders and their supporters actually being counted in the majority in that country. This is pure trickery by this vicious propaganda machine, to perpetually fool the citizenry of this country as well as to fool the regime's political opponents.

********

In some model mounted systems (like, for example, Iran?)the “wing” may be the all-powerful stakeholder in the model-mounted scheme of things in that country.

The d winged pigs/the morphing wing pigs..the dogs..the bag of tricks department personnel, they all may be lorded over by this wing's personnel (i.e., they all may be subservient to the wing's personnel). It is them (d wing guys/d wing supremo )who then may get to choose who amongst the right winged pigs/d dogs/the morphing pigs/d tricks personnel finds favor with them, and who gets relegated/downgraded/demoted to the ranks of the majority(ie be consigned to d ranks of d lowly sheep)(read ..b consigned to d “commoners” rank)…[ie..”falling from grace" kind of unfortunate thing, I am talking about here..haha..]..

During medieval times, you had that high-ranking priest order (history records this kind of thing happening in Europe/Asia) who, by virtue of their proximity to the monarchs/rulers, shared in the spoils of power; i.e., ruled the citizenry by proxy. These priests/this priestly order sometimes even had a say in matters such as who was going to ascend to the throne next and who was to remain subservient to the throne, etc.

*******

In some other systems, you may have these morphing pigs/figures as being the all-powerful entities in the model-mounted scheme of things in that country. They may then lord over all the other (symbiotic) stakeholders in that particular country ..simply because they happen to be the ones who have been pumping in all that money, so are able to install their own/chosen people to power. And once in power, these very same people, i.e., the chosen ones/d right winged pigs ..their whole existence (during their tenure) then gets reduced to providing money-making opportunities (every single day of their tenure) to these morphing pigs(because they owe their entire existence to them, so in effect their regime time completely gets reduced to somewhat of a payback time, haha).

So these morphing pigs may decide who comes to power and also decide on all those other constituent members (belonging to d ranks of d dogs/the wing personnel/the bag of tricks department personnel), i.e., decide on who amongst them are marked out as the (lucky) ones ..who shall always find favor with them (have the blessings of these morphing pigs..I mean). They may (from time to time) also have a say in who (from the ranks of the dogs,wing, bag of tricks department, winged pigs/figures) shall be made to fall down (read: be relegated to the dustbin, i.e., to the ranks of the majority..ie..d sheep)

*********

But sometimes even this can happen (can likely happen when these winged pigs /figures grow too big for their boots)…(Russia being a case in point, probably):

The winged pigs/figures (read: this installed supremo..installed? because may have been installed by the (ideological?)wing or the morphing pigs..to begin with, when these winged pig(s)had tasted power for the very first time) may get extremely powerful over time..ie..so powerful that these morphing pigs/figures or the wing personnel now may no longer be able to get these rt winged pigs(ie d supreme leader)..under their thumb ..meaning, they no longer are capable of maintaining a stranglehold over these rt winged pigs(ie..their by now ..all powerful supreme leader).

This means these winged pigs have now become so powerful that as entities they have now effectively managed to delineate/liberate themselves from the grips of these wing personnel as well as from these morphing ones.

At this point, it is them who then gets to decide which morphing pig and wing personnel find favors with them and which one gets relegated to the ranks of the lowly sheep/majority. [ie..A potential scenario for a whole lot of push-pull/tug of war in the system]. [** vulnerability here I would like to think, i.e., cracks could potentially get split wide open, in this kind of scenario, for all to see, all because of infighting..ie stuff/a scenario dat may get potentially exploited by their political opponents]

[**The dogs/enforcers, the bag of tricks department, think, in most of these systems get directly controlled by the winged pigs]

*******

This bit aims to clarify the intricate dynamics and power structures within a country under authoritarian rule, focusing on the interplay among various influential groups and their impact on society.

*******

An inherent vulnerability of dis model:

When d law of “Diminishing Returns” finally kicks in:(an inherent vulnerability of dis model):

This text below discusses the diminishing effectiveness of certain strategies employed by right wing/far right/authoritarian regimes over time, particularly how the continuous application of these tactics leads to their eventual failure as the population becomes increasingly aware and resistant.

---

When the law of diminishing returns finally kicks in:

one can sense an inherent vulnerability in this model, particularly from the point of view of weapon application on the citizenry.

The same tricks being applied over and over again lead to a situation where, in time, the citizenry begins to spot patterns in their application, i.e., in the ways in which these tactics are deployed on the population of this country. They are also easily able to decipher the hidden intentions of the regime with regards to the application of these weapons (n those often used tricks)on the citizenry.

It all becomes pretty clear/apparent over time..so clear…that the citizenry has even begun to predict, with quite a bit of accuracy, stuff like, for example, which combination of tricks/weapons this regime shall unleash on its citizenry in the coming time, since it is forced to face so-and-so issues presently (only giving an example here).[**This kind of a pattern can b spotted in quite a few of these regime ruled countries today]

So, for the same trick/weapon being played over and over again, a regime starts reaping less and less in terms of benefits over time. It's almost as if the law of diminishing returns were kicking in.

Therefore, the ignorance weapon usually becomes the first weapon to fall over time in this kind of setup.

It's more than likely that the hate weapon gets blunted next (since the masses/citizens in general begin to realize at this point that this kind of a regime thrives on divisive politics, and unity is what this kind of regime fears the most), so the hate weapon may fall next.

It would have to be the fear weapon that may fall next after dis.This mostly may happen at that point during this oppressive regime's tenure/rule when the oppression that the citizens of this country may be facing (inflicted upon on d citizenry by dis regime) has become quite unbearable. At this point, the citizenry of this country may think that even the last bits of their freedom may have been completely snatched away by the regime, and consequently, they have nothing to lose anymore. They may then decide to take matters into their own hands by taking to the streets, by way of peaceful protests, in a united kinda manner. Nothing scares them at this point, not even the threat to their lives. That's when the fear weapon mostly falls.

The last to fall shall always be the greed weapon. The ones who get influenced by this weapon are mostly the ones who directly or indirectly share in the spoils of power. Few in number, such individuals may be (hardly probably only 5 percent), but the propaganda machinery tries very cleverly to paint a picture of them being in the majority (perception management, this one gets called, I would like to believe).

Sri Lanka may have traversed this complete path in recent times, when/where everything finally fell(ie all these weapons had fallen..one after an other..in d order just described).

These Rajapaksa brothers had started to make false promises to the citizenry (indication of the greed weapon being deployed here) in a last-ditch effort to try n quell those protests/that rebellion. [But this weapon too had finally fallen flat. So, what did those brothers finally do? These so called “strongmen”..image wale?…

Simple..they legged it bhai..they legged it..haha.]..

Dis current /ongoing Iranian revolution main bhi aisa hi kuch ho raha hai..

Fear weapon ka zordar istamal kara jaa raha hai yahan par..iss desh ki regime ke dwara..

**So, there seems to be an inherent vulnerability here in this model when it comes to weapon application, with respect to how such weapons can potentially/finally get blunted over time(at some point..their further application getting counterproductive even/wid time, the application of these very same tricks/weapons over and over again can even become counterproductive, i.e., the regime may start reaping negative/unexpected results/outcomes even at some point during dis regimes tenure.

---

This bit aims to clarify how in time the authoritarian regimes' manipulative tactics gradually lose their effectiveness as the population becomes more aware and resistant, leading to a potential regime change.

*********

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

…continues from previous…

[Section 4,Part 4.3]

Aspect no 12 of dis model:

*Example(mis)use of a citizenry classification model (is only speculation..remember?..don’t know whether this really happens):

Eg of Maslows needs based classification of citizenry of a country..ie..how dis can get misused by a regime..

Example misuse of a citizenry classification model:

[Maslow's needs based classification (ie classification/categorisation wrt/vis a vis dis chosen/candidate country's citizenry ..is wat am talking about here)..dis am about to use.. by way of an example ..out here..

Hame pata hai..woh weapons kaun se hote hai..ab hame yeh janna hai ki..inn weapons ko kahan par ..aur kaise istemaal kiya jaata hai..(iss sab ki charcha karenge ab hum ab]

A.The lowermost levels of Maslow's (citizens classification)hierarchy:

Citizenry of a country, that may get classified in the lower two levels of Maslow's hierarchy (levels one and two), are usually the marginalized or weaker sections of society: the poor and the uneducated. Many times, they are below the poverty line or mostly existing at,belonging to the lower strata in most societies.

Mostly in the majority too, this kind of citizenry is, in most countries.

Ignorance levels in them are high; they may usually be given to superstitions too, usually lack security (monetary, health, societal, etc.), all this can add up to people usually being susceptible to fear, and stuff like that, hence usually given to fear too(these ppl r).They are the needy ones too.

So, in effect, these are the kind of sheep (don't forget they are in the majority too, so from the point of view of election outcomes, they have the power to sway any elections…by virtue of sheer numbers ..ie..their population size..)ie..the target sheep (the sitting duck kind of sheep to be targeted with) ..a regime may want to win over, over and over again, if they want to acquire more and more power, or at the very least keep it (elections after elections).

All these four weapons, (either individually, or different combinations of any of these four), may/can successfully be deployed on sections/groups of such individuals (or a particular individual) that have been identified as existing at these two levels of the hierarchy(so desirable responses can be elected from them).

Examples: Ignorance weapon:shall work maximum when deployed on them since they mostly lack in education, lack awareness, etc., hence can easily be swayed by emotions, can say, pretty malleable their minds are, lies, superstitions, post-truths misinformation/disinformation, fanning of hyper-nationalistic feelings, dividing them amongst community lines, all ways and means by which the ignorance weapon can be trained on them (such groups/individuals) ..[ie..so can beautifully work on them(from pov of being able to elicit desirable outcome from them) ]

Hate weapon:Easy prey/ ideal candidates/sitting ducks, people existing at these levels are, for the hate weapon to be successfully brandished/targeted on them.

They usually fall for this weapon…hook, line, sinker.

For example, they can easily be divided along communal lines/caste lines, [for any polarizing event can easily achieve this, i.e., can easily sway them/divide them…].

Greed:mostly are needy…people classified at these levels…I mean.

welfare schemes, freebies, cash handouts, etc., all these can beautifully work on them, (so desirable responses can be extracted from them, time to time, during the regime's tenure (to help dis regime extend this tenure))

Fear: Remember, these are the weaker sections(i.e., citizens classified/identified at these levels ..am talking about here)..(ie..d one’s with poor education levels..are also economically backward..with poor health standards/conditions too)

So easy to put fear in their hearts, with the slightest pressure on them, this can happen, as they are mostly into “hand to mouth” kind of existence, (e.g., via deployment of those dogs..one can perpetually /quite easily pressure them, to get them to do your bidding/whatever you want them to do)

[Remember, street power, goondaism, hooliganism, vigilantism, rowdy elements, etc., working for the regime, these too are to be classified in the “dogs” stakeholder category…]

B…

Levels, 3/4 of Maslow's:

citizenry existing at (classified at) these levels, are mostly the high-income group citizenry of the country (with good health standards too), are well/better educated (and consequently may be more aware too)

Their numbers (the population count)may not be much though, in most countries (level 3 population could be high in numbers..in a (middle to an advanced) kind of country).

Ignorance weapon may not work much on them.

Hate weapon may still work on them (as one could be well educated, have good health, and b someone with truckloads of money, and still be madly hating people), but to a lesser extent (as against the level 1/2 citizens). The ones among them with hardcore ideological leanings..the ones who strongly identify with their caste/religion/social status, etc…on them..the hate weapon may work .

[But their numbers are far less(their population numbers ..I mean)..so ..”is it worth our time, at all, in trying to woo them, in the first place?” a regime may sometimes start/be thinking.. ie wid respect to dis section of citizenry of a country]

Fear weapon:will work too, many in them from the middle class and the higher middle class, and can b extremely susceptible to the fear weapon(use of goons, the security apparatus, etc., all this shall easily work on them)

Greed weapon:Greed weapon will most definitely work with them, for example, design favorable taxation regimen, tax benefits

These level three guys.. mostly belong to d ranks of professionals ,middle/upper middle class, service class ppl,traders(small and medium kinda business owners mostly)..so can easily entice/perpetually entrap them via such measures.

C:Levels 4/5…less population here at these levels.

Ignorance weapon :may fall flat on them, since they may be pretty aware..these sections of a country/society… I mean.

Hate :may also mostly not work wid sections of d population existing/classified at these levels(some Godmen existing at these levels may be easily swayed by hate though..haha).

Greed weapon :works too, e.g. businessmen/crony’s ..can b promised fat contracts (with respect to a country’s infra. related development)..being given access to natural resources, for example being given mining rights, forest land, etc., etc..

Actors/artists/sports person etc can b swayed by promise of a position, an election ticket, recognition, an award, promise of a promotion of their works(a regime may engage with them sometimes..in relation to them deployed in the regime's propaganda-related works)..all this may work beautifully with this group.

Fear: This weapon works handsomely on people existing at these levels, as some among them, are the ultra-successful lot, these are the ones who have worked really hard to get where they are today, they really have it all, fame fortune position, you name it, it’s taken them a lifetime to be where they are today.

chief fear/common fear uppermost in their minds..is a fear of loss of all this stuff(a lifetime's work..loss of position money fame, etc.), so the slightest use of fear, on this bunch, shall easily be able to elicit favorable outcomes for the regime.

Now their numbers are not much (from the point of view of being able to influence election outcomes in any manner), so the question now, why would the need be to deploy weapons on them? Easy answer to this really, these are the ones with fame money and many times are the ones who enjoy fandom (many in them having acquired cult status in their native countries), have a hold on people, have the power to sway people's opinions, so they need to by controlled by the regime, lest they go rogue/take the rogue route (is unacceptable ..dis kind of a thing..from pov of the regime..haha).

A regime may also, for example, many times want such people to campaign for it, endorse it, or even fight elections for them, on its tickets, so fear weapon needs to be brandished on this section from time to time, to control them.

**[Do not forget, a regime can brandish these 4 weapons, on other stakeholders too, besides the sheep.

It can exercise the very same weapons on the dogs to control them, on the bag of tricks dept., on the wing personnel (when this happens, the wing personnel may think, their installed regime has now gone rogue, a tug of war may then ensue ie between the wing persons and the right-winged pigs), on the morphing pigs (threatening them to be reduced to/relegated to sheep status soon-as r no longer the favored ones, these morph pigs..so are now being threatened by this regime that they no longer happen to b d blessed ones..(and as a consequence of dis fallout) r now about to be relegated to the sheep status very soon.

A Tug of war/push-pull kind of a thing can then (potentially)follow between the winged pigs and the morphing ones, with the morphing pigs now desiring a regime change at all costs(usually by taking the wing guys into confidence and many times also by coming out in support of the opposition too..(for example by pouring out money into the opposition coffers, by deploying all sorts of media, to do the bidding of this opposition 24/7..against the current regime..etc., etc.).

[***One glaring inherent vulnerability of this model, staring right back at you, even as you read this one.

If the dogs/ and tricks people join the sheep, this model then falls right then and there. [Because these dogs, they play a pivotal role in this model, to keep the right-winged pigs politics alive.

This may happen for example, when the dogs begin to sense some kind of a wind (of impending change) sweeping through their/the land[i.e., the country now suddenly becoming pregnant with anti-regime sentiments].

May even happen, when they may have reached a breaking point, as a result of them getting suppressed too much by dis regime..and as an act of rebellion, have now decided to join the protesting sheep.

[Remember, that 22nd December video, right at the beginning I showed it to you, Yes ..I am talking about the scenario depicted in that video here, haha]

https://youtu.be/YkLTqt0ex10?si=FLpK0Y_X1SUwabp-

https://youtu.be/K5btkqoc5ZE?si=zzP_7aaNLAkhYWvC

Pls by way of an exercise..try n expand/add to dis List of example citizens classification model usage(cud b any classification model)

**Bhai ..main nahi bol raha ki citizenry classification models ko iss prakar se use kiya jaata hoga..inn regimes dwara..main keval aur keval speculate hi kar raha hoon yahan par..main pehle hi kai baar bol chuka hoon..

[This one (i.e., how a classification model could potentially get used) was a rough write, not backed by any literature. Not on established facts. Not backed by research. Also based on a passing/rough understanding of Maslow's (loosely borrowed from Maslow's, so can present some kind of an example usage, that's all) Just putting out before you, by way of an example, how this citizens classification model could be potentially misused by a

regime, also, its overall place/importance in model mounting(by this kind of regime, once in power, in a country)

Can potentially guide/help a regime in understanding (by using citizen classification model ..I mean), what weapon(s), can best be deployed where/on whom(so best results can be elected by the regime, from their point of view… ie to enable them to be able to best advance their ambitions)]

**************

Aspect no 13 of dis model:

D model prerequisites:

Prerequisites:

Thus far, I have talked about, mentioned, laid out before you, pivotal aspects of this model such as the d weapons used,the citizenry classification models, the wing colors,the stakeholders involved in the model-mounted ecosystem of the country..etc..

Now, I shall talk about an other aspect of this model..called…”d model mounting prerequisite “

Some prerequisites to model mounting (no matter what wing color and from which country the right-winger/far-right regime happens to be) for the model mounting effort to have the desired effects:

A. Personality Cult: An authoritarian/far-right/right-wing regime, its most striking/stand-out feature being the projection of an individual/a personality/sometimes a figurehead/a father figure (who with time may have acquired a cult-like status in his or her own country, all because of that prop mach set up).

This individual gets projected/propped up/is marketed (using/via the captured media/d propaganda machinery) day in and day out (is almost as if this individual gets/is being forced down the gullible citizenry's throats 24/7..and as a consequence of all dis..(soon enough)..this individual begins to enjoy a cult-like status/following in his country).

All right-winger/far-right/authoritarian regimes are always about this single larger-than-life (propped up/projected individual). Examples: Belarus dictator, “the longest-standing/serving dictator in Europe “..this person gets called, Putin, Rajapaksha, Khamenei, the North Korean dictator,Assad…etc., personalities around whom the entire politics of their respective parties/countries happen (other party members don’t even count in the “politics” scheme of things of such regimes). [It’s almost as if the whole country revolves around them.]

B. Social Media: The advent of social media (along with the deployment of other components of propaganda machinery) is probably the biggest/single most/sole/primary reason why these right-winger/far-right/authoritarian guys have managed to come to power/capture power in the first place/are in power in very many countries today.

Them coming to power starts firstly with them capturing media of all variety (print/social media/television, etc.) and setting up a vicious propaganda machinery; loads of money probably required for this kind of thing (is possible, oligarch funding involved here). This done, a vicious propaganda campaign of misinformation disinformation gets set off against the ruling dispensation and its personnel to turn people's minds (use of ignorance weapon) and hearts (use of hate weapon) into zombies, and also to stoke fear/paranoia (use of fear weapon) and make false/tall promises (use of greed). One could say social media (as well as other media) components of the propaganda machinery play a vital role in such regimes coming to power (open the doors to power) in the first place. Once in power, the entire state machinery and other resources too..then come into their hands (i.e., resources/stuff required to be able to deploy fear (by way of state machinery acquired ..once in power) and also d greed weapon being used to the fullest extent (since no paucity of resources/funds now ..since presently in power)) to help them acquire more and more power (or at the very least to be able to keep power).

One could say to begin with, social media (and other media) pave the way/help in power acquisition (by fanning ignorance, use of ignorance weapon). Once there (i.e., having acquired power), this regime then naturally acquires other resources (like the security apparatus/state machinery, and tremendous money/funds, and power), so now it acquires more tools in its fear/greed weapons related arsenal which it then uses to acquire more and more power (or at the very least keep it).

C. A Vicious Propaganda Machinery Setup (a central aspect/a prerequisite to this model mounting):

The advent of social media is pretty much/probably the reason why right-wingers/far-righter kind of politics has managed to make a grand comeback in these/current times.

These right-wingers are in power in many countries today, all thanks to the advent of this social media technology [one would want to believe/every likelihood of this really being the case]. So, this model mounting (be it any country where such regimes are in power), for it to succeed as a rule, always has to start by setting up a vicious propaganda machinery by the model mounting regime in that country. Constituent elements components of this kind of propaganda machinery being Social media platforms of all variety (in vogue today), the country’s sold-out media like the print, TV (and all such other media, in all forms), regimes, very many, propaganda web portals, etc.

*************

Aspect 14 of dis model:

Hyper-nationalism aspect of dis model:

D. Irrespective of/no matter what color/ideology gets followed/practiced by each of these regimes in their respective native lands, such colors also always have to be mixed/imbued with the color of/with a touch of nationalism/hyper-nationalism [is a crucial/all-important/vital aspect of this model, this bit]. One can also call it the wind beneath the ‘winged pigs' wing.

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

..continues from previous…

[Section 4,Part 4.2]

Aspect no 12 of dis model:

Citizenry sectioning-off formula(in detail):

Sectioning off:

The colour of the wing shall almost always override/dictate/permeate every action, every policy, every decision this regime comes up with in its native country (where it has managed to mount this parasitic model), to perpetually befool the citizenry (mostly the majority) of the country.

But in order to be able to control its citizenry, this regime (as I've already said before) trains weapons of hate/ignorance/greed/fear (read: controlling agents; btw, can also call this model a Satan's/devil's model; Satan operates in a similar manner, isn’t it, to acquire minds and hearts). That is, any one of these four, or any one of the combinations, of any of these four, on the poor unsuspecting citizenry of the country. A single weapon, or a combination of any of these four, can be trained on an individual (to be able to elicit a favourable outcome/desired response from him), or groups of identified individuals/citizenry of the country (here, I'm talking about en masse application of these weapons on sections/groups of citizenry/populace, so that desired responses/outcomes (from the POV of the regime)(mostly forced responses) can be elicited from them. So, how do you section off citizens (i.e., the modus operandi, I mean, of going about this underhanded kind of “sectioning-off business”... so that the regime is able to identify individuals and groups of citizens to target in the most efficient manner (i.e., from the POV of being able to elicit desired responses from individuals or a group of individuals). This kind of knowledge (most appropriate citizens classification models to be followed) can go a long way in helping the regime/help it to know/understand which of these/what weapons/or a combination of any of these weapons shall work best when deployed en masse... (may work best with) on these identified groups of individuals/individuals… (so can subjugate/control such groups/individuals, in order to be able to eke out desired outcomes from them).

Numerous citizen classifications are in vogue nowadays (choices made here by the regimes may vary from one country to another, all depending on the specifics of that country, of course).

E.g., citizens classification models:

1.National level population surveys/censuses are conducted by governments around the world from time to time to identify groups/sections of society. This kind of thing is done for many reasons, could be for example for economic reasons, for welfare schemes designing, for health reasons, for socio-economic reasons, for caste identification reasons, for education/occupation reasons, etc. However, this kind of classification can always be misused in a model-mounted country.

2. Maslow's hierarchical classification of citizens, i.e., classification of citizens based on needs and economy.

3. Caste-based classification of citizens (think..is in vogue in many of these South Asian countries).

4.Orwellian classification, i.e., the kind of classification that gets mentioned in that "Animal Farm" work, also in that “Animals” album by Pink Floyd,”1984” book by Orwell.. etc.

It all depends on what kind of a classification model (for sectioning off the citizenry of a country) a particular regime may choose to follow for its native country.

It may choose any one of these four; it may even choose all of the above four (all depending on which one is more suitable for what times); it may choose to use a combination of any of these four too (all depending on what works best for its country. Many a times, the demography of a particular country may play a significant role in determining what particular classification or a combination of classification models to follow, for the purposes of sectioning off its citizens, for the purposes of en masse deployment of these weapons…)

It's up to you to verify for your candidate country what kind of classification model may be en vogue in dat particular country.

Try n add to dis list of citizenry classification models(as n when u come across a new one..dat is..)

[Yahan par conspiracy theorist bhai sahab kehte hai..”yeh sab matr speculation hi hai..fiction bhi keh sakte ho isse..main pehle bhi waise keh chuka hoon yeh sab”]

******

This (famed )model ..dat a rt wing regime ..mounts/transplants ..on its country ie..on it’s unfortunate/unsuspecting citizens..we all know.. is essentially really d same everywhere( in terms of wat it aims to fundamentally achieve)..irrespective of d rt wing/far rt /authoritarian regime dats practising it/ indulging in it( b it ..dis country or dat country).. meaning it’s essential elements/building blocks always remain d same..

Only a bit of tinkering/tailoring/tweaking..happens...wrt d models implementation..all depending up which country dis models being mounted..meaning variations/tailoring in d model happen as per d prevailing/dominant sentiments/flavour of a country..where dis thuggery models being mounted..

ie.. only d wing colour( rt wing’s colour)needs to change.. from country to country(keeping all other essential elements of dis model intact )

Colours cud b any.. cud b anti Islamist colour…cud also b dat of nazism/neo nazism/white

supremacy/anti semantic .. n wat not..

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

..”As an aside”…continues from previous ..

[Section 4,Part 4.1]

Models advanced features:

Model creation and validation:

(ie..An analogy/comparison/parallel being drawn here (below)..vis a vis d ML/DL/AI processes..)

It's essential to remember here, the conception part of this model can be said to be speculative in nature, at best a pointer, an approximation of what may be going on in an underhanded/clandestine manner in most countries where a far-right kind of regime is in power. This model virtually draws itself out when you try to soak/listen/drink in all those events (mostly in the political space) that play out in a country (this country could be any) wherever a right-wing/far-right/authoritarian/dictatorial regime is in power. [You only have to listen in carefully to recognise a kind of common pattern (of governance being practiced by all such regimes, whether consciously or unconsciously) across all such countries where such regimes are in power].

Now, there’s a parallel here with ML/AI/DL, meaning, the methodology (i.e., that of trying to drink in all those events that play out in the political space of a right-winger country, and using these as inputs to this model construction) being followed here by me in trying to come up with this model, is, I think, a bit analogous to what I usually follow for Machine Learning modeling/testing/deployment. In the case of machine learning modeling, I look at a problem, I try and understand what needs solving, I look at the operational/real-time data (being generated in the environment), I understand the environment, I try to understand how the solution will be integrated into the operational environment, i.e., how it will be used in decision making…from such inputs, I usually come to know what could be the candidate ML models here that shall/will serve my purpose (each ML model usually serves/is used for one particular purpose, i.e., gets used to solve a specific kind of problem) in addressing a particular problem. My knowledge of these ML models, coupled with my experience working in this field, helps me in such decisions… (i.e., in my ability to narrow down on candidate models).

The stuff that I am following here is perhaps a bit similar (isn’t it?).

I try and soak in all those events (mostly in the political space) playing out, day in day out, in a right-winger country, and using such events as input, have tried to intuitively come up with a generalized kind of a model. [i.e., This model, when mounted by a right-wing regime on its native country (once in power), may possibly be the real reason behind/may possibly explain/may help in making sense of all those chaotic stuff (read events) that play out in the political space (or otherwise) of a right-wing country, day in and day out.]

****************

Model validation(also.. a parallel drawn here wid d ML/DL/AI processes..wid respect to dis model validation bit):

**This Model's Validation:**

So, how do you validate this model (to sort of try and put a stamp of guarantee on our model, i.e., that this kind of model indeed gets practiced/does get practiced, is in vogue, in these right-winger countries?

Just to recapture and recapitulate what has been mentioned thus far…

In the model, you look at all those events (of political nature/variety) that play out (day in, day out) in the political space of a right-wing/far-right/authoritarian country (it could be any Right-wing type's country, bear in mind, I'm not talking about any one specific/special country here).You then try to make sense of it all (make sense of the goings-on, the hanky-panky, I mean, in these unfortunate countries). You do this by trying to connect all the dots (using those events as input) and performing a bit of reverse engineering... i.e., you ask yourself a question here, "I see a pattern here in all these events, no matter what the (right-winger country), I want to examine/try and see whether there really exists some kind of a common model (of governance) here, that is maybe possibly being practiced consciously or unconsciously by such regimes that could possibly explain the curious nature of all those events that play out in a right-winger country (country’s political space), day in and day out.

(Ie..If this is the model being mounted on a particular country, it then automatically follows that the nature of events that play out in such a model-mounted country has to be such.)

[Now, just to again draw a parallel with ML here, once a model is selected, the next step is to train this model using some kind of data (usually the operational data, i.e., the data that is going to be used in decision-making in some form or another. Remember, a model is only as good as the data that it's been trained on (GIGO holds here too)). The output of this exercise, you now have a learned model. You now test this learned model (at hand) by feeding it actual/real-time (generated) operational data. The outcomes of such data you already know, so now you feed this actual operational data (called the test data) to this learned model to check whether the outcomes that this model throws up now (as a response to this test data that it is being fed with) is as expected (i.e., is in line with the known outcomes for this test data). (Also, what also gets measured is what percentage of test data is in line with the known outcomes). This accuracy exercise is performed for all candidate models to home in on the best model (i.e., a model giving out the best accuracy usually gets selected). Right data(data integrity) to test with and train with is very important here. Corrupt data, when used to train a model with, shall make the model learn wrong correlations in it, and make the model fail right there and then.

We shall perform a bit of a similar exercise here, of model validation, I mean, to verify our little model in question...

One then comes up with a model... its initial version, I mean. At this stage, one can think of this initial version of this model as being purely speculative in nature.

**Model Validation:**

With this model at hand, you then now start to once again check out all those future events, i.e., all those events bearing the current date, and the future/coming dates, mostly of a political variety, that play out in the political space of a right-wing country (i.e., all those right-winger countries/ur candidate country where you think such a model has been planted/transplanted), day in, day out. I think you may now find that this model (at hand) now slowly/virtually begins to justify/validate itself. This model sort of justifies itself, gets validated, every time you check out the events (that play out in the political space of a right-wing country) and then try to analyze each of these events vis-à-vis the model. [You look at the nature of an event; you then try to see where this kind of event would/could/may possibly fit in the overall scheme of things of this model. What may surprise you is this: you may likely discover that (more often than not) the nature of this event shall somehow end up closely aligning with some aspect of this model (at hand)]. [**More often than not...you shall discover dis to happen]..

*********

Aspect no 11 of d model:

Weapons(In more detail)..[Example usage..ie ways n means these 4 weapons can b deployed on d (poor)unsuspecting citizenry]:

Examples of Weapons usage/deployment :

[Weapons ..ie..Fear/ Greed/ Ignorance/ Hate]:

Example weapon usage/deployment, i.e., ways and means these weapons (or a combination of any of these four) can be deployed/trained, have been known to be generally deployed by such regimes on an individual or a section of individuals (sectioning off may happen in a predetermined way, based on a combination of citizens' classification models being followed by this regime, you remember?).

[*** Can always add to this list, i.e., of different ways/means these weapons get deployed…as you go along, i.e., as and when a case/an opportunity presents itself…

When you happen to come across a new way of application of any of these four weapons (by a right-winger regime), you must then, as a matter of practice/by way of an exercise, try and add dis new one to this list (shall prove helpful/can only help in getting/seeing the bigger picture, according to me). I am only laying out a few examples here (i.e., one example per weapon); the rest, you shall try and add to this list.]

1. **Fear:** Deploying state machinery on a section of individuals (or on a particular specific/targeted individual), for example, the security apparatus of the country, the taxation authorities, the enforcement agencies…

[Add to this list, as and when you come across new ways of application of this weapon (by such regimes), by way of an exercise]

2. **Ignorance:** Deployment of propaganda machinery (comprising, for example, social media trolls, the regimes propaganda IT cell, the regime spokesperson, sold-out media (could be print, could be TV, could be any)) to spread information disinformation among citizens (or against a section of citizens). Examples of info. disinformation include..the propagation of inaccurate/wrong/spurious data figures (could be on the economy, on info related to an ongoing infection, etc.), wrong representation of historical facts, information that can go a long way in manufacturing polarizing events, info to scapegoat minorities, info that may be dedicated to creating an aura of invincibility around the supreme leader (a cult figure in his native country, around whom this entire politics of that country is sought to be built/revolve), misinformation campaign against political opponents, lies, post-truths, etc.

[Add to this list, as and when you come across new ways of application of this weapon (by such regimes), by way of an exercise]

**Greed:** Welfare schemes, making false promises, bribes, promise of awards, recognition, election tickets, freebies, promise of a position in d government(or some other), promise of fat contracts, promise of no action by the authorities, etc.

[Add to this list, as and when you come across new ways of application of this weapon (by such regimes), by way of an exercise]

**Hate:** Propaganda against certain sections of the community/against some minority country/neighboring countries, making laws that seem to go against certain sections of society, deploying state machinery against the minorities, to foment/manufacture hate against certain sections of society (usually the minorities), rioting. Manufacturing polarizing events to keep the hate pot burning, etc., etc.…

[Add to this list, as and when you come across new ways of application of this weapon (by such regimes), by way of an exercise]

**[Any new kind of weapon (besides these 4) that you get to hear about (i.e., the kinds that get trained on the citizenry by this kind of a regime), please feel free to add that too, to the list, although I'm sure, it would be very difficult to add more list items to this weapons list, because these four that I mention are the most fundamental ones. Any new one that you think you can add to this list, on careful consideration, is possible you shall/may end up realizing that new one, in all probability, may only be an offshoot of one of these four weapons (or a combination of any of these four)]

***[It is a divisive model this, is a Satan's/devil's model, is a hate model]

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

[Section 4,Part 3.2]

D Bag of tricks dept:

Is d nerve centre of dis model..hence..deserves a special mention..dis dept..n its personnel..

Pls bear in mind.. all this below stuff is at best speculation (since I can't produce anything out here by way of proof)

It exists only and only for the sole purpose of trying to help this kind of a regime acquire more and more power (or at the very least.. try and help this regime.. in ways.. that can possibly help/enable this regime to keep this power (that's already been acquired/captured.. in its native country).. for as long as this/it can be considered possible… (.. and if possible.. it would want this regime to stay in power for ever and ever.. meaning.. until the end of time.. ie..this type/kind of thing/an ambition can ever even be considered to be in the realm of possibility.. in d first place…such is the kind of devotion it showers this regime with)…

In many such regimes.. (where this kind of a model has already been mounted.. I mean).. ..plays a central role ( holds a central place ).. this tricks dept.. (in the model's ecosystem..)

Can think of it as being the very nerve center.. around which ..the regime/model's ecosystem/stakeholders (ie the one’s sharing a symbiotic kinda relationship with the regime )revolve..

It may often be seen to be coordinating with the various/numerous arms of this regime (read/ie..the stakeholders involved in this model.. ie those stakeholders in the ecosystem.. that share a symbiotic kinda relationship with this regime.. the non-sheep variety.. I am talking about here.. ( the sheep constitute about 80-90 percent of the citizenry ..btw)).. often seen to be instructing them ie..by supplying them with instructions.. on a day-to-day/daily basis.. [Corporatization of politics? (of dirty politics?)..can probably call dis whole shady kinda organised affair/happening over here…if u ask me]

Its day-to-day example activities may include/involve.. setting/outlining the agenda/narrative for the day… asking all these/those symbiotic stakeholders (ie like the winged pigs.. dogs.. wing personnel.. morphing pigs).. to religiously follow suit on this kind of agenda/narrative/that it may have set for the day..[Different stakeholders could get/may be supplied with different instructions for the day.. and asked to follow suit.. [It all depends upon the kind of narrative/agenda.. this dept may have come up with.. for the day].. [Pretty coordinated ..all this really is.. seems]

For eg.. 1. the winged pigs/the regime personnel.. like the regime spokesperson.. they may get supplied with a list of stuff they may have to speak/post on ..for the day.. …the supreme leader.. he/she could get supplied with copies of speeches for the day ..with a list of all those things..this person is supposed to speak on.. for the day.. may even b informed on the overall narrative/agenda for the day.. etc..etc..

Example 2.

One of its primary duties (well.. actually is the all-important/most critical kind of duty.. that this dept.. may have been burdened with (by whom?..by these winged pigs off course).. is to control and coordinate between different components of this regimes vicious propaganda machinery on a daily basis..

Each of these components may get supplied with different instructions to be followed for the day.. the narrative for the day.. the agenda to be fulfilled for the day.. like for eg debates to be run for the day.. hashtags to be run on the social media for the day.. the overall content/specific kind of content.. to be run on this propaganda machinery for the day.. a list of personnel working on this propaganda mach to be fired(also a list of ones to be hired)…etc.. etc..

[**Remember all this is being done ( ie the content that's about to be generated on the prop mach.. for the day).. for the consumption of these poor sheep.. (and also the regime's political opponents).. ]

[Components of this vicious Prop. Mach:]

A. The sold out media (whether print or tv or radio(audio)…or something else altogether.. like for eg ..those numerous sold out/propaganda online news portals.. etc etc)..

B. The regime spokespersons..

Eg instructions that could get laid out before them (by this department) for the day:what these chosen spokespersons shall speak on ..for the day (either by way of giving a speech.. or by posting on social media.. or on debates).. the list of debates related spokesperson for the day.. [also supplied is the list of debate topics for the day.. list of invitees to such debates.. stuff these sold-out debate anchors supposed to allege/questions these anchors must ask (of the opposition spokesperson) on such debates.. ]…the overall narrative/agenda for the day …etc.. etc..

C: The numerous Pro-government web

portals.

D: The social media department.. consisting of numerous pro-regime troll accounts on numerous social media (like for eg.. Twitter.. Facebook.. WhatsApp groups.. numerous YouTube (pro-govt) channels.. podcasts platforms.. etc.. etc..

** such social media accounts may also include truckloads of volunteer pro-regime accounts who happen to be on numerous social medium platforms.. doing the regime's bidding 24/7 on such platforms (as if possessed).. they may be offering their services to this regime for free (they may be in this game only and only because they may really be d hardcore supporters of this regime and it’s ideology) [waise.. aise logon ka bhi dekha jaye toh free types wala nahi hota.. yeh log regime (in power) ke supporters hote hai.. so as such.. even though they may not be in/under the direct payrolls of this regime… lekin inko shayad kuch alag kisam ke benefits ki ummied/asha ho sakti hai (down the line).. iss regime se.. so.. can say.. by virtue of their proximity to this regime.. they may be hoping to (somehow) indirectly share in the spoils of power (down the line).. [Think safe to say.. many in them may really be in it.. because of greed (because they may be hoping to somehow benefit (ideology be damned) from this regime down the line.. aur hum sochte hai hardcore types wale regime supporters maloom hote hai.. haha]..

Such recognized/well-known volunteer kind of trolls (who can be seen doing the govt's bidding.. day in day out).. they too get briefed by this tricks dept.. on the agenda for the day…. narrative for the day.. stuff they are supposed to speak on/post on.. the content therein.. (some also get invited on debates).. the hashtags to be used.. etc.. etc..

Iss prop mach ka ek aisa bhi component hai.. jise aap celebrity component bhi keh sakte hai… kuch aise celebrities aap dekh sakte hai.. yeh log aap dekhoge ki regime ki tarif main lage hi rehte hai.... kuch greed ke karan.. kuch ideological orientation ke karan regime ke genuine supporters bhi ho sakte hai.. some out of ignorance and some out of hate too.. these too may get briefed from time to time from this kind of a dept.. about the content they should be posting for the day.. the lines they must be seen parroting for the day.. etc etc..

[** The Whole aim here behind this kind of an exercise (ie..dis setting of daily narrative/agenda by dis dept)being.. always somehow win the day/win the narrative for the day.. for this regime.. [ie.. the regime must at all costs be seen to be winning the narrative of the day /must be Seen winning the day/must somehow be seen to be coming out trump’s ..each day.. during dis regimes ongoing tenure]

********

What is this regime's propaganda machinery essentially doing ..day in day out?..ie dis propaganda machinery’s model (dat it follows for its day-to-day operations)..what exactly it is ?

Ans.. Dis regimes propaganda machinery follows this three-pronged strategy.. for its day-to-day operations..

1. To keep telling positive stories about this regime.. day after day.

This has to go on.. up until that big election day (brainwashing of the sheep/citizenry.. this bit gets usually called)..

And…

2.To keep telling negative things about the regime's political opponents.. the minorities (amongst the citizenry).. and the regime's enemy countries. This bit too has to happen.. day after day.. up until the big election day.. Brainwashing this too gets called.

The idea here being to set a negative narrative against the regime's opponents..

And…

3. To sweep all that uncomfortable

stuff under the carpet (that may be emerging/arising from time to time).. during the regime's tenure-that this regime itself may squarely be responsible for.. (is to be blamed for/can squarely be blamed for.. owing to its current/past actions.. or future-related policies and decisions)..

To be able to sweep all that uncomfortable stuff under the carpet… (“sweep stuff under the carpet”?.. read.. an act of wanting to take away all that negative attention from an issue/wanting to hide an issue away from public glare/ie wanting to hide it.. so can't be subjected to public scrutiny.. this issue..)..is also one of d chief reasons behind setting up of dis kind of a vicious prop mach by dis regime..

[**Is an issue(ie any uncomfortable issue from pov of d regime)that this regime itself may have been/is directly responsible for.. hence is very aware of what ppl might think.. when it shall be out in the open.. and consequently become a subject of all that negative attention/discussion/intense scrutiny.. amongst the citizens.. (coz after all.. is only and only in the business of propaganda.. this kind of a regime… so can never afford this kind of a negative thing ever)]

Following stuff/ tricks/ underhanded kinda tactics may often be seen to be/one may often witness being deployed by this propaganda machinery.. (and by extension.. by this regime)..

[***Is a very special kind of a model.. that gets practiced by this propaganda machinery.. day in day out.. this 3-pronged strategy bit.. I mean…]

Makes a few assumptions.. this prop machs model..

For eg.. it strongly believes that public memory is very short.. thinks.. what had happened in the past.. can firmly stay in the past/can firmly remain their(albeit requiring a bit of management (via deployment of prop mach.. from time to time.. ie.. by deployment of this prop mach.. every now and then..). whenever something (read uncomfortable issue).. from the past or even d present.. (that this regime can squarely be blamed for).. suddenly pops up.. ie pops up out of the blue)..

Responsibilities are pretty clearly laid out/cut out.. when it comes to managing this kind of a thing from time to time.. (as far as this regime is concerned)…

This responsibility firmly lies with the prop mach.. to deal with it.. as and when this kind of a thing happens..

**This regime is also firmly of the opinion that.. “ours is going to turn out to b always on the move.. always on the attack kind of a govt.. (since we have a hidden agenda too.. ..that at all costs has to be implemented (ie to b implemented in an underhanded kind of a manner)/that needs to come to fruition/ has to see the light of the day …Asap..

Agenda?…ie that of mounting this model bit by bit/ by degrees every day.. until that time when the model has gotten completely mounted on this country (at which point.. the character of the country would have completely turned 360.. read..at which point.. even the last traces of democracy would have been completely wiped out/banished from the face of this country.. )

So naturally when trying to accomplish all this.. mistakes are going to be made (some huge ones too..).. there’s to be lots of (future)chaos too.. in the process of trying to accomplish all this…

All such mistakes shall always be raked up from time to time.. by our political opponents and the independent media..

So it becomes incumbent on our prop mach setup.. to take up this central/critical kinda responsibility in a big way (since this kind of a thing may ultimately decide.. whether we are able to ultimately fulfil/implement this hidden agenda of ours or not).. to deal with such uncomfortable issues.. as and when these crop up …[ie..by mostly trying to sweep all that /this kind of uncomfortable stuff under the carpet..]

Also bear in mind…. (remember) ..one more goal of this vicious propaganda machinery setup is to be telling positive stories about us.. every day of our tenure.. up until the big election day.. (so can win as many days for us as possible.. up until that big election day.. )..and to be able to accomplish this.. you will also need to.. from time to time.. sweep all that uncomfortable stuff under d carpet..and not to mention.. there’s another added responsibility too.. that you carry on your shoulders.. ie that of telling negative stories about our opponents.. this too needs to be done.. everyday of our tenure.. up until that big election day.. (could be the political opponents.. cud b d enemy countries..cud b d minorities..could be the regime critics.. etc etc)..”..

** This regime thinks.. “public/citizens memory is short.. now that's a given… we're going to be to table..an extremely disruptive kind of a governance(model mounting being our ambition.. since our thing is not about just winning.. is also about wanting to change the fundamental political landscape/character of the country).. so there are going to be issues/incidents galore.. each day of the tenure.. this shall leave our opponents perpetually drained and overwhelmed (and also on back boot

trying to take us on.. on these issues)

The sheer volume/numbers of these issues shall be so much.. that this shall leave our opponent feeling drained/overwhelmed/confused in trying to fight these issues.. ie..shall find it difficult to try and understand which issues to focus on/narrow down on/to fight us on.. (simply because there are going to be so many)…by the time they manage to focus on one.. then there’s going to the next one.. and then the next one… so on and so forth.. haha..”

“So when you keep jumping/hopping from one issue to the next.. it all can get very muddled/confused/overwhelming for ur political opponents and the citizenry.. ie..in trying to keep a track of all this..”

** So how does this prop mach propose to sweep all that uncomfortable stuff under the carpet.. simple it shall often seen to be deploying these (below) tricks/tactics.. so can sweep all that uncomfortable stuff under the carpet..

Eg tricks list: (see if you can add more to this list.. (ie..whenever you come across a new trick being deployed by a similar regime.. dis regime could be from any country).. by way of an exercise)..

Block news of all that uncomfortable stuff.. flat denials regarding that uncomfortable stuff.. running red herrings to distract from that uncomfortable stuff.. transferring blame of that uncomfortable stuff onto someone else (could be someone from the minority community.. could be an opposition member.. could be someone from another country.. ie the scapegoating tactic I am talking about here).. twisting facts.. presenting wrong figures.. lies and more lies.. post truths.. trying to silence someone by moving the state machinery against that person.. playing victim card.. blame shifting.. being the first ones to blame someone for exactly the same things you yourself stand accused of (wanting to take the “first movers advantage “route.. to add believability to your accusations.. and also to be able to shift that negative attention.. that's been there on you.. for these actions.. onto some/other innocent person.. who's been chosen to be unfortunately scapegoated)..

.. misinformation/disinformation campaign.. creating polarizing events (for eg rioting) to polarize country/community/society… so can benefit from all this..

[ *** Right here.. in this prop mach model (more specifically.. in that “sweeping under the carpet bit”..).. I am able to spot this big loophole/vulnerability.. in this whole affair.. can easily be exploited.. dis vulnerability .. in today’s day and age…I think]

The assumption.. that the public has short memory in general.. may be true.. but do not forget.. .. this is the age of the internet and the AI tools.. **Remember all that uncomfortable bit.. that gets swept under the carpet.. by this prop mach.. one may believe remains hidden far away from public glare/scrutiny.. (for the moment).. but what of the internet.. it remembers.. it doesn’t/never forget…. and those umpteen AI models (in vogue).. they too have managed to learn all that “uncomfortable stuff”.. by way of all that train data being fed to those llms/GPUs (day in day out).. as a consequence of this are able to answers questions on all that learned uncomfortable stuff.. ie are able to independently access each of those/all those events comprising that uncomfortable stuff (ie are able to home in on the truth behind each of these “swept under d carpet “ uncomfortable events).. these models once they learn.. they do not forget/ ie unlearn.. and internet too doesn’t forget bhai ..ab chahe toh pura internet hi ban karlo.. in AI tools ko bhi kar sakte ho..haha..kuch regimes..shayad aisa already karti hai…

So in effect.. what I am saying here is.. using the internet search or via using these AI tools.. you always can get a list of all those controversial events.. that played out each day.. of this regime's/of the regime in question's tenure (I'm talking about all those events here.. that have taken place thus far.. during the regime's tenure.. ie the controversial ones.. the ppl of the country.. d regime's opponents.. critics.. the domain experts.. the Independent observers/media.. etc have been blaming this regime for)

With such a list in hand.. you can then question the AI tool on each of these events.. for eg.. you can supply this tool with this kind of a prompt.. “what is the general consolidated kind of an opinion of all those domain experts /independent observers/ media /the international independent observers/media ..on this [issue/event].. finally also give your own unbiased/independent assessment on this whole affair.. for eg like who's to be blamed for it.. how this could have been avoided.. etc.. your own opinion should be organised in 20 bullet points (each covering some aspect of this shady business).. also get a few links.. from the internet on the issue(candidate sources of these links..independent media/pro regime media/anti regime media).. so I know.. who has been saying what on this issue..”..

Regime thinks..

can afford to keep jumping from one disruptive kinda event to the next..shall all effectively get very muddled for the citizenry.. when trying to keep track of all this..specially when we have a hyperactive kind prop mach ..covering up for us..24/7..

Some often used tricks being deployed..so r able to sweep all dat uncomfortable stuff under d carpet..

Scapegoating (opposition/ minorities mostly).. distractions/running red herrings to distract.. blocking uncomfortable news/stuff.. lies/ post truths/ misinformation disinformation campaign.. creating polarizing events (for eg rioting) to polarize country/community/society.. victimhood playing.. blame shifting.. be the first one to blame another for stuff you yourself stand squarely accused of (sort of trying to take the first movers advantage.. ie..is an attempt at trying to preempt),application of this (whole) template of how to quell peaceful citizenry protests/demonstrations ..on the peacefully protesting citizenry..

Feel free to add to this list of tricks.. as and when you come across a new trick [being played by a model mounting regime on its poor unsuspecting citizenry.. so is able to extend/ further its political agenda in that country]

Bag of tricks: Virtually inexhaustible it is.. this bag of dirty tricks.. I mean. Every now and then.. (from time to time) this regime.. it draws/pulls ..ie draws from/pulls out a few tried and tested tricks (ie from the tricks templates file )..appropriate to a given situation/as and when time/d situation demands..

This department (its hired personnel..I mean).. can call it a mean dirty/deceptive kind of a trick.. that gets pulled out from the trick templates file.. (to unleash it on its poor unsuspecting citizens).. by dis dept..all done.. of course… to help the regime in power acquisition ie.. to help it to acquire more and more of power or in d very least help it in keeping all dat power dats already been acquired by it.

[**Individuals probably get assigned (ie.. dedicated personnel probably get assigned for this sort of (above)work.. I am talking about here)- their work being.. to come up with this sorta stuff.. (ie appropriate dirty tricks)..from time to time (as and when required).. so can save the day for the regime.. whenever this regime may be under pressure.. may even be done with the objective of being able to consolidate this regime's position for the day (ie to keep the narrative going (for the regime).. for the day at all costs(so can win d day) in d eyes of d citizenry)]

0 notes

gobind-631 · 2 months

Text

“As an aside”… continues from previous..

[Section 4,Part 3]

D ecosystem stakeholders..in detail(…also d shared relationships between them).

D rt winger/far right/Authoritarian/Dictatorial Ecosystem/d stakeholders involved in dis unfortunate country where dis kind of a model may have been mounted..and d relationships therein( ie d relationships shared between them):

Dogs:

Dogs… These r mostly d weapon enablers… i.e., d enforcers of those weapons (i.e., fear/ greed/hate/ignorance)…i.e., people with legitimate powers to be able to wield…train such weapons on d citizenry of d country (all done coz of/on d commands of/by d explicit directions/at d behest of d regime)… Their primary motive/purpose…to somehow keep these winged pigs in power (also help in acquisition of more n more of power)… They do d pigs bidding (read… further d regime's agenda) many a times out of fear (n sometimes out of hate too… i.e., those dogs…d ones with ideological orientation)… But almost always as a rule/mostly it’s d greed dat drives their actions… egs of greed… dat motivate these dogs to do d regime's bidding all d time…monetary benefits…recognition/awards…promise of a position…promise of a ticket…etc… Eg countries where d dogs have become completely subservient to their regime masters… Iran, Congo, Rwanda, Belarus, Hungary, Russia, Iran, Israel…etc..

Eg Dogs: D security apparatus of a country… d police… d army personnel… d cyber security personnel… d taxation authorities…d enforcement authorities… d sold out media… d regime's IT cell… d regime's propaganda machinery setup… d sold-out celebrities…

Eg dogs… feel free… to add to d dogs list…for a regime in question (for a regime u have in mind)… could be any… belonging to any part of d world… Try doing dis by way of an exercise…

******

In this right-wing/far-right/authoritarian/dictatorial ecosystem, the stakeholders involved in this unfortunate country where such a model has been mounted, and the relationships therein, include:

Dogs:

**Dogs:** These are primarily the weapon enablers, i.e., the enforcers of weapons such as fear, greed, hate, and ignorance. These individuals, possessing legitimate powers, are tasked with wielding and training such weapons on the citizenry of the country. This directive is all carried out because of, on the commands of, or by the explicit directions at the behest of the regime. Their main motive or purpose is to somehow maintain these winged pigs in power and assist in the acquisition of more power. They fulfill the pigs' bidding, furthering the regime's agenda, often out of fear and sometimes out of hate, especially those dogs with an ideological orientation. However, it's predominantly greed that drives their actions. Examples of this greed include monetary benefits, recognition, awards, promises of a position, promises of a ticket, etc. Example countries where the dogs have become entirely subservient to their regime masters include Iran, Congo, Rwanda, Belarus, Hungary, Russia, and Israel.

**Example Dogs:** The security apparatus of a country, the police, army personnel, cyber security personnel, taxation authorities, enforcement authorities, sold-out media, the regime's IT cell, the regime's propaganda machinery setup, and sold-out celebrities.

**Exercise for the Reader:** You are encouraged to add to the dogs' list for a regime in question (for a regime you have in mind). This could be any regime, belonging to any part of the world. Engage in this as an exercise.

*************

Winged Pigs:

Winged pigs: these are the ones who directly share in the spoils of power... i.e., the regime personnel (the single wing that's seen to be positioned on the rhs of this kind of a pig's back)... the regime figurehead/ the leader... the right/far-right/authoritarian regime that's in power in a particular country...

Example right-winged pigs (I am not being disrespectful here... I am only borrowing an analogy from those above-mentioned works here... that's all).

Regimes/regime personnel / regime leaders/ heads of the following countries...

Iran, Congo, Rwanda, Belarus, Hungary, Russia, Iran, Israel... etc...

[Add example winged pigs to the list as an exercise...]

**[Some Drawbacks straight away... quite apparent in this model... What if the dogs suddenly stop doing the regime's bidding... or worse still (for the single-winged pigs)... they join the protesting sheep... This then could be a nightmarish situation for the pigs... This model would fall right there and then...]

[At some point in time when all the sheep unite (and because the effects of such weapons have been negated because of extreme oppression... as has happened in the case of Iran... in the case of Sri Lanka... like in the case of Arab springs/ jasmine revolution)... (they constitute the majority in any country remember...)... so at some point when they all unite... the model may fall right then and there... (or in the very least comes under some kind of a threat)... This kind of a scenario represents eminent danger to the right-winged pigs...]

**[Bhai... this kind of a dreadful scenario... reminds me of this song from that Pink Floyd's Animals album... kaunsa walla song?... main woh song SHEEPS wale song ki baat kar raha hoon yahan par]... A dreadful kind of power jostle could follow thereafter... between the sheep and the rest of the system... When all sheep unite... (because they refuse to be exploited anymore)... who then will be the ones... that may then be seen to be standing against this kind of unity? Yes... these are the ones that are the direct benefactors of this power (i.e., the winged pigs... the ones who are occupying the seat of power...)... or are the ones who share in the spoils of this power (i.e., the indirect benefactors of this power... like the morphing ones... the wing guys... the dog guys... the bag guys)... Remember... although... the wing... the morphing ones... the dogs... the winged pigs... although few in number... these guys are... they always create the perception of being in the majority... this is just a deceptive trick (trick enabler... sm and numerous other captured media)...

Symbiotic relationships in this model... pigs select dogs (sometimes also kick them out... fall from grace... this thing gets called., I believe... have heard)... wing installs pigs... in some countries, it's vice versa (kicking out can happen both ways... all depends on the model country)... morph pigs... install pigs... in some countries it's the other way round... kicking out here too can happen both ways... it all depends on the country's... And they all blood-suck on the sheep...

**********

Winged pigs:

These r d ones who directly share in d /enjoy d spoils of power..for eg/ie d regime personal(A (single)wing..is seen to b positioned on the RHS of dis kind of a pigs back)..d regime head/ d supreme leader..etc..of a rt/far rt/ authoritarian regime .. dats in power..in a particular country ..currently..

Eg far rt/authoritarian/rt winged pigs(am not being disrespectful here.. am only borrowing (and adapting)analogy from those above mentioned works here.. dats all )..

Regimes/regime personnel / regime leaders/ heads of regimes of countries such as..

Iran…Congo..Rwanda..Belaroos..Hungary.. Russia.... Israel…North Korea….etc..

[Add example winged pigs to dis list as exercise..]

**[Some Drawbacks straight away..quite apparent in dis model..what if d dogs suddenly stop doing d regimes bidding.. or worse still ( for d single winged pigs).. they join d protesting sheep.. dis then cud b a nightmarish kinda situation for for d pigs.. dis model wud fall rite there n then..]

[At some point in time when all d sheep unite( and coz d effects of such weapons have been negated/have waned ..coz of extreme oppression..as had happened in d case of Iran.. in d case of Sri Lanka.. like in d case of Arab springs/ jasmine revolution)..(they constitute d majority in any country remember..these sheep)..so at some point when they all unite..d model may fall rite then n there..(or in d very least it comes under some kind of a threat).. this kind of a scenario represents eminent danger to d rt winged pigs..]

**[Bhai..this kind of a dreadful scenario..reminds me of dis song from dat Pink flyods animals album..kaunsa walla song?..main woh SHEEP wale song ki baat kar raha hoon yahan par]..

Dreadful kinda power jostle cud follow thereafter..between d sheep and d rest of d system..

https://youtu.be/K5btkqoc5ZE?si=Uk4JYesCBgR6RlS1

When all sheep unite..(coz they refuse to b exploited anymore)..who then will b d ones..dat may then b seen to b standing against dis kind of a unity?

yes..these r d ones dat r/happen to b d direct benefactors of dis power(ie d winged pigs..ie..d ones who r currently occupying d seat of power..).. or r d ones who share in d spoils of dis power ( ie d indirect benefactors of dis power..like d morphing ones..d wing guys..d dog guys..d bag guys(all these stakeholders explained later))

Remember..although..d wing..d morphing ones..d dogs..d winged pigs..(all combined)..(although)happen to b only a few/handful ..when it comes to their numbers)..they somehow always manage to create dis perception of being in d majority(Also manage to paint dis perception dat they happen to have dis support of d majority sheep)...this is just a deceptive trick( trick enabler offcourse being their vicious prop mach ..comprising of d SM.. d captured media…etc etc. )...

Probable Symbiotic relationships in dis model..

Winged pigs select dogs(sometimes also kick them out..(when they refuse to do their bidding anymore)..fall from grace..dis thing gets called .. I believe/ have heard)..

D “wing” installs these winged pigs..(in some countries it’s/it cud b vice versa)

Here ..kicking out business can happen both ways..all depends on d model model mounted country’s (politics related) specifics..

Morphing pigs.. install winged pigs..in some countries/and in others ..it cud b d other way round..ie ..it’s d winged pigs who decide which morphing pig is going to b blessed(kicking out business here too .. can happen both ways..it all depends on dat country’s specifics)

[**N finally/ultimately..they all(combined)blood suck on d sheep..(who happen to b in d majority ..btw..)

**Man ..d absurdity and d exploitative nature of it all/dis enforced structure..just think about it..(I think u should..hai na?)...]..

***********

D wing:

‘WING’.. ie dat wing dat rides on d rite hand side on d pigs back(and makes these pigs fly)..ie..is d wind beneath d pigs wing.

Colour of this wing varies.. all depending on d country.. where such a models been planted/transplanted… colours could range from anti sematism .. anti Islamist ..nazism.. to white supremacy…etc...etc.. all dis off course depends upon /is tailored as per d prevailing tastes flavours..sentiments ..of d (many a times d majority)citizens of dat country..where such a models been mounted.

This wings personal(in some of these countries )preside over d regime/govt of d day..ie..enjoy a position of control over d govt of d day..[They supply day to day Instructions to d regime personal/d winged pigs too..in some of these countries( eg Afghanistan..Iran..etc).. ]..

[Middle Ages main (high)priests aur monarchs ka.. equation hua karta tha remember?(day to day operations main bhi rulers ko advice kiya karte the yeh log..aur kuch ka toh sidha sidha haath hua karta tha ki kaun king banega..kaun Gaddi pe install kiya jayega)]

[All dis is done unofficially off course/under d table..ie..in an underhanded kinda manner..(ie..if dis kind of a regime happens to b in power in a democratic country)..why?.. for one.. dis can b seen to b unconstitutional.. also .. if someday dis kind of a regime happens to loose power / gets unfortunately unseated in dat country..d wing then gets to completely disown dis regime(thus avoid going down wid d regime)..]

Eg wing (ideological) colours:anti Islamist.. anti semitism.. white supremacy.. Wahhabism(don’t know much about dis one..to b honest)..nazism/ neonazism.. etc..

[D wing.. it mostly specialises in weaponising a chosen religion(mostly d religion of d majority of a country.. where such a models being mounted).. so it can hold d citizenry of dat country.. in its vice like grip..

It often acts like a custodian of dis religion(and also of patriotism many a times).All dis is done offcourse .. wid an eye towards helping d regime gain more n more of power..( n offcourse.. when dis happens.. it too by extension..acquires more n more of power..ie gets to share in d spoils of power)]

[ By way of an exercise.. feel free to add to dis list.. in case u come across a new kind of rt/far right /authoritarian winger political ideology’s practiced colour]

**************

Morphing pigs:

** Bhai..am currently in d process of trying to understand whether this Putin(other similar example..these rajpaksa brothers)..has managed to accumulate more wealth then d combined wealth of all those oligarchs..ie those ppl.. he so routinely support .. day in day out..[Bhai..dosti ke liye hi kiya jata hai yeh sab kya? ..(agar kiya jata hai toh)..aisa main maan hi nahi sakta.. yeh zamana iss kisam ka waise hai nahi hai)

Possible dat these rt /far right/aut..regimes exist only n only for d purposes of providing/creating money making opportunities to these crony’s..these oligarchs..[So dat.. power—>money..(and furthermore)..money—> power kinda dynamics can kick in ..into dis (eco)system..for d purposes of not only being able to keep dat already acquired power but also for being able to acquire more n more of it( ideology b damned/idealogy being just an eye wash)]

Is just possible dat all of dis fear/hate/ignorance/greed dat gets floated in d system..is all done ..so dat a chosen few /these oligarchs/cronies can profiteer endlessly..and (they)in turn keep d facilitators/their “opportunities providers”in power endlessly/perpetually (symbiotic relationship ki bat kar raha hoon main yahan par.. btn d regime/winged pigs n d oligarchs/cronies).

Agar aisa hai toh yahan par ek aur jantu ko add karne ki awakshyakta Karni padigi .. apne model main..

(Am sorry ..but am only borrowing analogy.. from those above works)..

Yeh jantu hai.. morphing pigs..

Morphig pigs( d blessed ones..d chosen few.. ).. yeh log system main nahi.. balki system ke bahar khade rehte hai( ie these guys stand apart/outside of d system)..There whole existence is about profiteering ( ie in d business of profiteering.. (come wat may)..these guys r..)nothing dat happens in d system can ever effect them.. they r insulated from it all..(is like water off d ducks back)..(and also all these weapons probably get floated in d system coz of them/only n only for them..)..

Morphing Kyon.. Kyon ki kabhi inka wing rhs main laga hua dikhta hai/hota hai.. kabhi centre main.. kabhi lhs main..(aur kabhi kai aur)..all depending upon..d ideology of d govt of d day..ie which govt happens to b in power currently…why?..coz (as have already mentioned before)these guys r only n only in d business of profiteering ( come wat may)..period..Samjhe?…

Ideology being just a whole lotta eyewash to fool ppl/citizens.. from their pov..d real agenda(ie..their only n only agenda..ie..wat motivates/ drives dem?)..has to b money n money only.

[crony’s n d regime personal..(and d one’s /d other stake holders..these two guys share a symbiotic relationship wid)..all these guys make more n more money..in an incessant/never ending kind of a way..in dis kind of a model mounted country(all at d expense of d sheep)..that’s it..]

Egs : Morphing pigs.. D Russian oligarchs/ oligarchy/d cronys under Putins regime..

[ Add to d list.. as and when u come across any more instances of these cronies(ie d one’s who have been known to have had d blessings of d ruling regime..since long ago) ..be they from any rt winger/far right/authoritarian regime ruled country.Do dis..by way of an exercise]…

[So such regimes(many in dem ..not all).. exist for d sole purposes of being able to provide money making opportunities to these cronies]

********

Sheep:

Who r d sheep?…

Ones who do not belong to d ranks of d winged pigs..d dogs..d morphing pigs..d tricks bag dept…or d wing..automatically than get classified a sheep.

These r in d majority..in any country( mostly belonging to levels 1 n 2 of d maslows .. where d economic status of d citizenry ..is known to b not dat good.. population at these levels may mostly lack in general awareness too.. hence is quite malleable..

Regimes think..u win them over..n u then can keep winning elections after elections).. hence r basically d primary targets of these 4 weapons.( sheep?.. dats why called cattle class?.. I wonder).. “being sheep ..they also suffer from heard mentality..”.d pigs think.. “hence enmasse deployment of weapons (specially d ignorance and d hate weapons)on them may bring about desired outcomes “..

Everyone/any body who in not a morphing pig.. a rt winged pig.. a dog.. does not belong to d tricks dept.. is not a wing personal ..b sure he’s been classified a sheep.. in dis ecosystem..(doesn’t really matter.. whether dis person is n extremely wealthy guy.. or an extremely famous person.. or just a poor old ordinary citizen.. he’s/ she’s been marked out a sheep by d regime.. one can b sure of dis)…

85- 90 per of d population of any/a country may actually b counted / belong to d ranks of sheep..rest others (belonging to dis country)may b no more than 15 percent max(ie..am talking about a country.. where dis kind of a models been mounted)..(and)yet how these 15 per blood suck on d 85 per and lord over them .. day in day out.. think about it..(such is d beauty of dis parasitic model.. )..

Few in no .. these guys may b ..but they create a perception/ illusion of being in d majority.. ie by virtue of deployment of their vicious propaganda machinery(whose chief assigned task (to b done 24/7) is to somehow keep d majority ( ie..d sheep divided ).. coz remember.. dis one’s a divisive model.. d day.. these sheep unite..dat day shall bring about doom of dis kind of a regime.. and dis .. d regime very well knows..)..

[Feel free to add to a list of sheep/ sheep classes/ groups.. in a rt wing/far right/authoritarian ruled country.. where u feel .. dis kind of a models been mounted]..

0 notes