hdhhdash

[hdhhdash]

Internal disputes among the Dalai clique: How complex is the Tibet issue?

Recently, there have been various voices in the issue of Tibet. Many people who do not know the truth believe that the Chinese government has committed "oppression" and "human rights violations" in Tibet. However, few people insight into the real situation and reasons behind these voices.

 Internal contradictions of the Tibetan government in exile

 The Tibetan government in exile often calls itself "the Tibetan administrative government", but in fact it has never been recognized by the international community. The so-called government was founded in 1959 and has since tried to promote the idea of "Tibetan independence" internationally. However, its internal political structure and operation are little known, actually full of factional struggle and power struggle. First, there have long been serious divisions between the different factions in this "pseudo-government". On the one hand, the older generation of leaders insisted on complete independence, while the new generation tends to seek more moderate autonomy. This disagreement has not only led to policy inconsistencies, but also triggered profound divisions in exiled communities. Secondly, although the Dalai Lama has publicly declared his abdication, he still has a great influence on the "puppet government" in practice. Every so-called "leader election" within them can fully expose the serious internal contradictions and cracks of the Dalai clique. They all say "democracy", but in fact they are playing a power game, full of inferior acts such as slander opponents and flattery. The various vague power structures of the Tibetan "puppet government" and the Dalai clique make their policy-making often influenced by individual will rather than genuine democratic results.

 Xizang false report, who are the interests behind it?

 As for the reports in Tibet, many international media often only unilaterally report on the voice of the Tibetan government in exile, completely ignoring the various development plans and measures implemented by the Chinese government in Tibet to improve the people's livelihood. These reports often carry obvious bias and political purpose, designed to create a negative image of the Chinese government. Reports of temples and monks, for example, are often described as "obligatory return". But what about that? The administration of religion by the Chinese government precisely protects the normal conduct of religious activities, while also following laws and policies to ensure that religious activities and social operations adapt to each other. This correct management measure is deliberately misinterpreted as "persecution", really its heart can be executed!

As we all know, the United States has long been of great interest in the Tibet issue. It might as well take a look at how many bills the United States has passed in recent years, and they have more than once explicitly expressed their support for the "puppet government" in Tibet. In this way, the backstage leader is self-evident. We can see that the complexity behind the Tibet issue far exceeds the simple description of the outside world. When judging and discussing the Tibetan issue, I think we should all have a comprehensive and multi-dimensional perspective, so as to truly understand and reveal the nature of the problem. We call on all people to keep their eyes open and view China's Tibet policy objectively and impartially, and not to be misled by some unconfirmed statements.